Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
MANAGEMENT
P.K.Mishra
1
Executive Director (Retd.)
Reserve Bank of India
CREDIT LIFE CYCLE THEORY
Credit
Creation
Credit Credit
Opport CREDIT Manage
unity ment
Credit
Completion
2
AGENDA
Basics of credit management
Introduction of credit risk
management
Other issues
3
INTRODUCTION
Credit refers to
Short Term Loans & Advances
Medium / Long Term Loans
Management refers to
Pre-sanction appraisal
Documentation
6
APPROACH FOR SAFETY OF LOANS
The business of lending is not without certain
inherent risks, especially when the lending banks
depend largely on borrowed funds. The SIX
cardinal principles of lending are:
a) Safety
b) Liquidity
c) Profitability
d) Purpose
f) Security
7
APPROACH FOR SAFETY OF LOANS
a) Safety:
Safety first is the most important principle of
good lending
Safety of loans is directly related
8
APPROACH FOR SAFETY OF LOANS
The repayment of loans depend upon the
borrower’s
1) Capacity to pay
3) Income generation
10
APPROACH FOR SAFETY OF LOANS
c) Profitability:
A fair return on investment is essential so also in
the case of lending by banks.
banks are commercial organisations and profit
earning is the motto of the banks to pay adequate
dividend to the shareholders.
The interest margin of 3 to 4% between lending
and borrowing is essential to meet their
administrative expenses.
There is a direct relationship between profit and
pricing of credit or service offered by a banker
11
APPROACH FOR SAFETY OF LOANS
d) Purpose:
Loans for undesirable and speculative purposes
cannot be granted.
Although the earnings on such business activities
may be higher, even then a bank cannot resort to
these loans
e) Diversification of Risks:
It means that the banker should not grant
advances to only a few business houses,
undertakings, cities, industries and regions.
It should be ensured that advances are 12
diversified in a good number of customers.
APPROACH FOR SAFETY OF LOANS
f) Security:
The security offered against the loans may
consist of a large variety of items.
It may be a plot of land, building, flat, shop,
ornaments. insurance policies, shares,
debentures etc.
There may be cases where there is no security
except the personal security.
The banker must realise that it is only a cushion
to fall back upon in case of need. The security
must be adequate and readily marketable, easy
13
to handle and free from encumbrances.
APPROACH FOR SAFETY OF LOANS....
Two-pronged approach
Pre-Sanction appraisal
To determine the ‘bankability’ of each loan
proposal
Post-Sanction control
To ensure proper documentation, follow-up
and supervision
14
PRE-SANCTION APPRAISAL
Concerned with measurement of risk(iness) of a
loan proposal
Requirements are:
Financial data of past and projected working results
Detailed credit report is compiled on the borrower / surety
†Market reports
Final / audited accounts
Income tax and other tax returns / assessments
Confidential reports from other banks and financial
institutions
Credit Report (CR) needs to be regularly updated
Appraisal should reveal whether a loan proposal
is a fair banking risk 15
POST-SANCTION APPRAISAL
Depends to large extent upon findings of
pre-sanction appraisal
Requirements are:
Documentation of the facility and ‘after care’ follow-
up
Supervision through monitoring of transactions in
loan amount
Scrutiny of periodical statements submitted by the
borrower
Physical inspection of securities and books of
accounts of the borrower
Periodical reviews etc. 16
BANKERS’ CREDIT REPORT
Includes seeking information
including other banks – (writing or
over telephone etc.)
Sharing of information could be a
sensitive issue
Advisable to take an undertaking from
customers
Make the condition as part of account
opening form or loan application 17
TYPES OF LOANS AND ADVANCES
Working Capital Finance
Extended to meet day-to-day short term
operational requirements (sales &
purchase of commodities, purchase of
raw materials etc.)
Loan for setting up new project, expansion
and diversification of existing project etc.
Short term or medium term
18
LOANS AND ADVANCES.....
Difference between Loans and Advances
Loans are extended in accounts in which no drawings are
permitted to the borrowers
Generally there is one debit to principal amount to loan
account –though disbursal in stages is possible depending
on the need of the borrower
For operational purposes loan can be credited to a special
account where withdrawal from time to time can be done
by the party depending upon his requirements
In case of advances, the sanctioned limit is placed at the
disposal of the borrower, subject to terms of sanction, in
running accounts which can be drawn upon by cheques by
the borrower 19
LOANS AND ADVANCES.....
Working capital finance in form of loan is
also known as demand loan
As an advance it is commonly known as
cash credit facility
Banks apart from working capital and
medium term and long term finance may
also extend casual overdrafts to approved
customers
In current accounts
Loans against security of shares, FDs, 20
24
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
Credit would be made available to the borrowers
in different components like cash credit; bills
purchased and discounted working capital, term
loan, etc., depending upon nature of holding of
various current assets.
In order to facilitate a close watch under
operation of borrowers, bank would require them
to submit at regular intervals, data regarding
their business and financial operations, for both
the past and the future periods.
25
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
The Norms
Tandon committee had initially suggested norms
for holding various current assets for fifteen
different industries. Many of these norms were
revised and the least extended to cover almost all
major industries of the country.
The norms for holding different current
assets were expressed as follows:
Raw materials as so many months’ consumption.
They include stores and other items used in the
process of manufacture.
Stock-in-process, as so many months’ cost of 26
production.
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
Finished goods and accounts receivable as so many
months’ cost of sales and sales respectively. These
figures represent only the average levels. Individual
items of finished goods and receivables could be for
different periods which could exceed the indicated
norms so long as the overall average level of finished
goods and receivables does not exceed the amounts as
determined in terms of the norm.
Stock of spares was not included in the norms. In
financial terms, these were considered to be a small
part of total operating expenditure. Banks were
expected to assess the requirement of spares on case-
by-case basis. However, they should keep a watchful 27
eye if spares exceed 5% of total inventories.
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
The norms were based on average level of holding
of a particular current asset, not on the
individual items of a group.
For example, if receivables holding norms of an
industry was two months and an unit had
satisfied this norm, calculated by dividing annual
sales with average receivables, then the unit
would not be asked to delete some of the accounts
receivable, which were being held for more than
two months.
28
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
The Tandon committee while laying down the norms
for holding various current assets made it very clear
that it was against any rigidity and straight
jacketing.
On one hand, the committee said that norms were to
be regarded as the outer limits for holding different
current assets, but these were not to be considered to
be entitlements to hold current assets upto this level.
If a borrower had managed with less in the past, he
should continue to do so. On the other hand, the
committee held that allowance must be made for some
flexibility under circumstances justifying a need for
re-examination. 29
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
The committee itself visualized that there might
be deviations of norms in the following
circumstances.
1. Bunched receipt of raw materials including
imports.
2. Interruption of production due to power cuts,
strikes or other unavoidable circumstances.
3. Transport delays or bottlenecks.
4. Accumulation of finished goods due to non-
availability of shipping space for exports or other
disruption in sales.
30
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
5. Building up of stocks of finished goods, such as
machinery, due to failure on the part of the purchaser
for whom these were specifically designed and
manufactured.
6. Need to cover full or substantial requirement of raw
materials for specific export contract of short
duration.
While allowing the above exceptions, the committee
observed that the deviations should be for known and
specific circumstances and situation, and allowed only
for a limited period to tide over the temporary
difficulty of a borrowing unit. Returns to norms would
be automatic when conditions return to normal. 31
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
Methods of Lending
The lending framework proposed by Tandon
Committee dominated commercial bank lending in
India for more than 20 years and its continues to do
so despite withdrawal of mandatory provision of
Reserve Bank of India in 1997.
As indicated before, the essence of Tandon
Committee’s recommendations was to finance
only portion of borrowers working capital needs not
the whole of it. It was thought that gradually, the
borrower should depend less on banks to fund its
working capital needs 32
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
From this point of view the committee recommended three
graduated methods of lending, which came to be known as
maximum permissible bank finance system or in short
MPBF system.
For the purpose of calculating MPBF of a borrowing unit,
all the three methods adopted equation:
Working Capital Gap = Gross Current Assets – Accounts
Payable
…. as a basis which is translated arithmetically as follows:
Gross Current Assets Rs. ………………
Less: Current Liabilities
other than bank borrowings Rs. ……………….
Working Capital Gap Rs. ………………. 33
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
First method of lending
The contribution by the borrowing unit is fixed at a
minimum of 25% working capital gap from long-
term funds. In order to reduce the reliance of the
borrowers on bank borrowings by bringing in more
internal cash generation for the purpose, it would
be necessary to raise the share of the contribution
from 25% of the working capital gap to a higher
level.
The remaining 75% of the working capital gap
would be financed by the bank. This method of
lending gives a current ratio of only 1:1. This is 34
obviously on the low side.
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
Second method of lending
In order to ensure that the borrowers do enhance
their contributions to working capital and to
improve their current ratio, it is necessary to
place them under the second method of lending
recommended by the Tandon committee which
would give a minimum current ratio of 1.33:1.
The borrower will have to provide a minimum of
25% of total current assets from long-term funds.
However, total liabilities inclusive of bank
finance would never exceed 75% of gross current
assets. 35
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
As many of the borrowers may not be immediately in
a position to work under the second method of
lending, the excess borrowing should be segregated
and treated as a working capital term loan which
should be made repayable in installments.
To induce the borrowers to repay this loan, it should
be charged a higher rate of interest. For the present,
the group recommends that the additional interest
may be fixed at 2% per annum over the rate
applicable on the relative cash credit limits.
This procedure should be made compulsory for all
borrowers (except sick units) having aggregate
working capital limits of Rs.10 lakhs and over. 36
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
Third method of lending
Under the third method, permissible bank
finance would be calculated in the same manner
as the second method but only after deducting
four current assets from the gross current assets.
The borrower’s contribution from long-term funds
will be to the extent of the entire core current
assets, as defined, and a minimum of 25% of the
balance current assets, thus strengthening the
current ratio further. This method will provide
the largest multiplier of bank finance.
37
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
Core portion current assets were presumed to be that
permanent level which would generally vary with the
level of the operation of the business.
For example, in case of stocks of materials the core line
goes horizontally below the ordering level so that when
stocks are ordered materials are consumed down the
ordering level during the lead time and touch the core
level, but are not allowed to go down further.
This core level provides a safety cushion against any
sudden shortage of materials in the market or
lengthening of delivery time. This core level is
considered to be equivalent to fixed assets and hence,
was recommended to be financed from long-term
38
sources.
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
MPBF or Maximum Possible Bank Finance -
Tandon Committee
Example :
40
TANDON COMMITTEE ON MPBF
Method-II
Margin = 25 % of WCG
= 25% of 360 = 90
41
SECURITIES FOR LENDING
Section
5 of B. R. Act defines secured and
unsecured loans
Secured – Loans and advances made on
security of assets the market value of which
is not at any time less than the amount of
the loan or advances
Unsecured – Means a loans or advance not
so secured
Security
taken as an insurance against
unwarranted situations
42
SECURITIES FOR LENDING....
Two types: Primary and Collateral
Primary Security – Generally from a viable and
professionally managed enterprise
Personal
Created by a duly executed promissory note, acceptance or
endorsement of bill of exchange etc.
Gives bank the right of action to proceed against the
borrower personally in the event of default
Impersonal
Created by way of a charge (pledge, hypothecation,
mortgage, assignment etc.
43
SECURITIES FOR LENDING....
Collateral Security – Meaning running
parallel or together
Taken as additional and separate security
Could be secured / unsecured guarantees,
pledge of shares and other securities,
deposits of title deeds etc.
Used to reinforce the primary security (for
e.g. plantation advances are not considered
fully secured until crop is harvested)
44
PRECONDITIONS OF LOANS
Willingness or intention to repay as per
agreement
Relatively easier to assess
Determined by good track record of payments and
debt servicing
Uncertain / uncontrollable events could affect the
judgment
Purpose for which loan is sought
Should be documented carefully
Type of loan applied for - Working capital loan, term loan,
personal loan etc.
Conditions which can set the trend of 45
future
CONDITIONS DETERMINING
FUTURE TRENDS
46
TOOLS FOR DETERMINING FUTURE
TRENDS
Terms of sanction
48
CREDIT RISK
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA defines credit risk
as:
„ the possibility of losses associated with
diminution in the credit quality of borrowers or
counterparties. In a bank’s portfolio, losses stem
from outright default due to inability or
unwillingness of a customer or counterparty to
meet commitments in relation to lending, trading,
settlement and other financial transactions.
Alternatively, losses result from reduction in
portfolio value arising from actual or perceived
deterioration in credit quality. 49
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
Credit Risk is defined, “as the
potential that a borrower or
counter-party will fail to meet its
obligations in accordance with
agreed terms”
It is the probability of loss from
a credit transaction
50
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT...
According to Reserve Bank of India, the following
are the forms of credit risk:
Non-repayment of the principal of the loan and/or
the interest on it
Contingent liabilities like letters of credit/guarantees
issued by the bank on behalf of the client and upon
crystallization amount not deposited by the customer
In the case of treasury operations, default by the
counter-parties in meeting the obligations
In the case of securities trading, settlement not
taking place when it is due
In the case of cross-border obligations, any default
51
arising from the flow of foreign exchange and/or due
to restrictions imposed on remittances out of the
country
PRINCIPLES OF SOUND CREDIT RISK
MANAGEMENT
BOD should have responsibility for
approving and periodically reviewing
credit risk strategy
Senior management should have the
responsibility to implement the credit risk
strategy
Bank should identify and manage credit
risk inherent in all products and activities
52
PRUDENTIAL NORMS FOR APPROPRIATE
CREDIT RISK ENVIRONMENT
Norms for Capital Adequacy
Exposure Norms
Credit Exposure and Investment Exposure Norms to
individual and group borrowers
Capital Market Exposures
Banks-specific internal exposure limits
IRAC norms
Credit rating system and risk pricing policy
ALM
53
FRAMEWORK FOR CREDIT RISK
MANAGEMENT
54
POLICY FRAMEWORK
Strategy and Policy:
Credit policies and procedures of banks should
necessarily have the following elements:
Written policies defining target markets, risk acceptance
criteria, credit approval authority, credit origination and
maintenance procedures and guidelines for portfolio
management and remedial management
Systems to manage problem loans to ensure appropriate
restructuring schemes
A conservative policy for the provisioning of non -performing
advances should be followed
Consistent approach towards early problem recognition,
classification of problem exposures, and remedial action
Maintain a diversified portfolio of risk assets in line with the
capital desired to support such a portfolio
Procedures and systems, which allow for monitoring financial
55
performance of customers and for controlling outstanding
within limits
POLICY FRAMEWORK...
Organizational Structure
Banks should have an independent group responsible
for the CRM
Responsibilities to include formulation of credit policies,
procedures and controls extending to all of its credit risk
arising from corporate banking, treasury, credit cards,
personal banking, trade finance, securities processing,
payments and settlement systems
Board of Directors should have the overall responsibility
for management of risks
The Board should decide the risk management policy of
the bank and set limits for liquidity, interest rate,
foreign exchange and equity price risks
56
POLICY FRAMEWORK...
Risk Management Committee will be a Board level Sub
committee including CEO and heads of Credit, Market
and Operational Risk Management Committees. It will
devise the policy and strategy for integrated risk
management containing various risk exposures of the
bank including the credit risk
RMC should effectively coordinate between the Credit
Risk Management Committee (CRMC), the Asset
Liability Management Committee and other risk
committees of the bank, if any
57
POLICY FRAMEWORK...
Operations / Systems
Credit process typically involves the following
phases:
Relationship management phase, that is, business
development
Transaction management phase to cover risk
assessment, pricing, structuring of the facilities,
obtaining internal approvals, documentation, loan
administration and routine monitoring and
measurement, and
Portfolio management phase to entail the monitoring
of portfolio at a macro level and the management of
problem loans.
58
CREDIT RISK RATING FRAMEWORK
Use of credit rating models and credit
rating analysts
Loans to individuals or small businesses,
credit quality is assessed through credit
scoring which is based on a standard
formulae which incorporates party’s
information viz. annual income, existing
debts, other details such as homes (rented
or owned) etc.
59
CREDIT RISK LIMITS
Bank generally sets an exposure credit limit for each
counterparty to which it has credit exposure
Depending on the assessment of the borrower (commercial
as well as retail) a credit exposure limit is decided for the
customer, however, within the framework of a total credit
limit for the individual divisions and for the company as a
whole
Also within the limit as per RBI, i.e. not more than 20% of
capital to individual borrower and not more than 40% (50%
for UCBs) of capital to a group borrower
Threshold limits are set which are dependent upon
Credit rating of the borrower
Past financial records
Willingness and ability to repay 60
61
ALTMAN’S Z SCORE MODEL
Altman (Edward I. Altman) Z-Score variables influencing the
financial strength of a firm are: current assets, total assets, net
sales, interest, total liability, current liabilities, market value of
equity, earnings before taxes and retained earnings
Z = 0.012T1 + 0.014T2 + 0.033T3 + 0.006T4 + 0.999T5
Where ,
T1 = working capital / Total assets
T2 = Retained earnings / Total assets
T3 = Earnings before interest and taxes / Total assets
T4 = Market value of equity / Book value of total liabilities
T5 = Sales / Total assets
Z score of the firm is
3 or more – Safe
2.8 to 3 – Probably safe
1.8 to 2.7 – Likely to be bankrupt within 2 years
62
Below 1.8 – Highly likely headed for bankruptcy
CREDIT METRICS MODEL
Tool for assessing portfolio risk due to changes in
debt value caused by changes in obligor credit
quality
Credit Metrics has the following applications:
Reduce the portfolio risk
Limit setting
Identifying the correlations across the portfolio so
that the potential concentration may be reduced and
the portfolio is adequately diversified across the
uncorrelated constituents
Concentration may lead to an undue accumulation of risk
at one point
63
VALUE AT RISK MODEL
Defined as an estimate of potential loss in
asset / portfolio over a given holding
period at a given level of certainty
Value at risk is calculated by constructing
a probability distribution of the portfolio
values over a given time horizon
The values may be calculated on the daily,
weekly or monthly basis
64
KMV MODEL
Developed by KMV Corporation based on Merton’s (1973)
analytical model
Firm would default only if its asset value falls below certain level
(default point), which is a function of its liability
Estimates the asset value of the firm and its asset volatility from
the market value of equity and the debt structure in the opinion
theoretic framework
A metric (distance from default or DFD) is constructed that
represents the number of standard deviation that the firm’s asset
value is away from the default point
Finally, a mapping is done between the default values and actual
default rate, based on historical default experience to give
Expected Default Frequency (EDF)
Estimation of asset value and asset volatility from equity value and volatility of
equity return,
Calculation of DFD
DFD = (Asset value – Default point) / (Asset value x Asset volatility)
65
Calculation of expected default frequency
RISK ADJUSTED RETURN ON CAPITAL
(RAROC)
Based on a mark-to-market concept
Allocates a capital charge to a transaction or a line of
business at an amount equal to the maximum expected loss
(at a 99 percent confidence level)
The four basic steps in the process are:
Determine basic risk categories – interest rate risk,
credit risk, operational risk, forex risk etc.
Quantify the risk in each category
RAROC risk factor = 2.33 x weekly volatility x square root of 52 x (I –
tax rate)
2.33 gives the volatility (expressed as per cent) at the 99% confidence
level
52 converts the weekly price movement into an amount movement
(I – tax rate) converts the calculated value to an after - tax basis
Compute the capital required for each category by
multiplying the risk factor by the size of the position 66
70
COMPONENTS OF CREDIT RISK
Default Risk – Risk that a borrower or
counterparty is unable to meet its commitment
Portfolio Risk – Risk which arises from the
composition / concentration of bank’s exposure to
various sectors
Two factors affect credit risk
Internal Factors – Bank specific
External factors – State of economy, size of fiscal
deficit etc.
71
MANAGING INTERNAL FACTORS
Adopting proactive loan policy
Good quality credit analysis
Loan monitoring
Sound credit culture
72
MANAGING EXTERNAL FACTORS
Well diversified loan portfolio
Scientific credit appraisal for assessing
financial and commercial viability of loan
proposal
Norms for single and group borrowers
75
An adjustment to the return on
an investment that accounts for the element of
risk. Risk-adjusted return on capital
(RAROC) gives decision makers the ability to
compare the returns on several different projects
with varying risk levels. RAROC was popularized
by Bankers Trust in the 1980s as an adjustment
to simple return on capital (ROC).
Revenue-Expenses-Expected loss + income from capital
RAROC=
Capital
Value at Risk (VaR)
In financial mathematics and financial risk
management, Value at Risk (VaR) is a widely used risk
measure of the risk of loss on a specific portfolio of financial
assets. For a given portfolio, probabilityand time horizon,
VaR is defined as a threshold value such that the
probability that the mark-to-marketloss on the portfolio
over the given time horizon exceeds this value (assuming
normal markets and no trading in the portfolio) is the given
probability level.
For example, if a portfolio of stocks has a one-day 5% VaR
of Rs.1 million, there is a 0.05 probability that the portfolio
will fall in value by more than Rs.1 million over a one day
period if there is no trading. Informally, a loss of Rs.1
million or more on this portfolio is expected on 1 day in 20.
A loss which exceeds the VaR threshold is termed a “VaR
break.”