Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Objective
Fracturing
Proppant Acid
Conductivity by Conductivity by
proppant pack uneven surface in
formation face
Mechanism
Formation
S Sd Sc Sp
Wellbore
Wellbore
rs
Pwf
frac
rw
Pwf
Well centerline
ideal
h
Pwf
real
re Ks Kf
rw
rs
re
Candidate Selection
• Carbonate formations
• Very damaged wells
• Post treatment performance
• Short fractures: permeability
• Placement in naturally fractured carbonate
formations
• Closure stress
• Temperature
The Gray Zone
1 < permeability < 10 md
soft rock (chalks)
70 to 85% acid solubility
high porosity (>30%)
nearby oil/gas/water contact
requires specialty core testing
• RESULTS
• FRACPRO
• C-MAP
• STIMWIN
• AcidXpert Log
• Specialty core testing
Design Considerations
Treating Fluids- Stages
Controlled by:
• Acid fluid loss rate
• Fracture width
• Injection rate
• Fluid temperature in the fracture (Cool down)
• Formation type
• Acid system
Design Considerations
Economic analysis
Optimal
NPV
TREATMENT COST
Lf = 500
CUM. GAS
Lf = 300 FRACTURE
HALF-LENGTH
Lf = 100
FRACTURE 3
Unstimulated HALF-LENGTH
TIME 2
1
Design Considerations
KW
Design Considerations
Dimensionless conductivity
wkf wkf
F CD = or Cr =
kLf kL
wk
f = Fracture Conductivity, md-ft
k = Formation Permeability, md
L f = Fracture Half-Length, ft
T°
Xf
Why on
earth?
Kw
Xf Near wellbore
conductivity
Conductivity Profile
Parameters:
Kw
• Acid concentration
• Temperature
Xf
• Fracture width
• Rock embedment
• Mineralogy
Processes
Rx Kinetics
Fluid dynamics
NOT