Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
p p
|
ime
ow is benchmarking used?
ompare performance of an existing process against other
companies¶ best-in-class practices
etermine how those companies achieve their performance
levels
mprove internal performance levels ¦
a
ompetitive
enchmarking
Functional
enchmarking
nternal
enchmarking
Product
enchmarking
Process
enchmarking
est Practices
enchmarking
trategic
enchmarking
Parameter
enchmarking
D
2
a
r
2
hecklist
|
å elect process and define defect and opportunities
å
easure current process capability and establish
goals
å Understand detailed process that needs
improvement
·
2
`
å putline industries/functions which perform your
process
å Formulate list of world class performers
å ontact the organization and network through to
key contact
ü
2
¦
å esearch the organization and ground yourself
in their processes
å evelop a detailed questionnaire to obtain
desired information
å et up logistics and send preliminary documents
to organization
*
2
D
å Feel comfortable with and confident about
your homework
å Foster the right atmosphere to maximize
results
å onclude in thanking organization and ensure
follow-up if necessary
o
2
r
!
å eview team observations and compile report of
visit
å ompile list of best practices and match to
improvement needs
å tructure action items, identify owners and
move into mprove phase
|
2
·
"
||
åPolicy regarding benchmarking protocol should be
communicated to all employees involved, prior to
contacting external organizations. uidelines should
address the following areas:
å #
å $ #
$
!
!
å % #
!
å #
enchmarking ompliance |`
enchmarking ompliance
å voiding inappropriate communication and
contacts with competitors.
|D
enchmarks &
enchmarking:
anaging hange
can be described as
the process of seeking out and studying the best internal and
external practices that produce superior performance.
â on¶t reinvent what others have learned to do better!
â
orrow shamelessly!
â dopt, adapt, advance!
â mitate creatively!
â dapt innovatively!
|r
Process
enchmarking
! focuses on discrete work processes
and operating systems, such as the customer complaint
process, the order-and-fulfillment process, or the strategic
planning process.
! seeks to identify the most effective
operating practices from many companies that perform
similar work functions.
ts power lies in its ability to produce bottom-line results. f
an organization improves a core process, for instance, it can
then quickly deliver process improvement
|·
2
2 represents a versatile process management
tool that helps organizations identify and understand what
constitutes best operating practices.
2
are the operating statistics or measures that
define the achievement level of any given practice or system.
hese are not in and of themselves enough since they
provide J J into the root causes of performance
differences.
reflects full process or
system capabilities. Performance indicators may include
dimensions such as cost, productivity, cycle time, yields,
error rates, waste and turnover. |ü
esigning uccessful
enchmarks:
ffective Performance
enchmarks eflect the
ost mportant
pperating imensions of a
usiness Process, ystem, or Function.
'"(a '
±
±
±
'"(a "a
± V J J
± VJ J
±
J |*
J
JJ J J
.
enchmark esign rchitecture
Ma
in designing a performance
benchmark system is to that will
J
management to achieve the organization¶s
strategic objectives.
Ma
is to
J to
,
, and J
the performance measures.
|o
usiness Process Performance
easures
simple process analysis model can help identify your
organization¶s most important workflows. his model
reveals that all work can be viewed in
four sequential stages:
1. m
ùincluding those from both employees & suppliers);
2.
ùincluding internal operations & support services);
3.
ùyour organization¶s products, services, and
documentation); and
4.
People esign of
Products/
aw
aterials ervices Products (
omponents Production of ervices
Products
!
ustomer Performance
equirements of ervices
esults
apital elivery of "$
Products/
ervices
nput-putput Process
odel `|
) a
arketing; nformation
anagement; Provide onsultancy ervices;
olution ntegration;
usiness
anagement; Plan the etwork;
Financial nalysis; uman esources
anagement; pperate the etwork;
Plan ntegration; Leased & apital sset
gt. Provide upport ervices;
ccounting; Legal;
anage nformation esource;
uman esources Financial
anagement.
anage Finance;
nfrastructure Provide echnical &
x)
x
)
x
&
'
!" (
"
"
#
$
%
'
" " (
`D
*
"
+
`r
enchmarking
ritical uccess Factors
M÷
÷
÷ + well-designed
performance measurement and benchmark system is
essential, but there are other critical success factors:
å enior management support;
å
enchmarking training for the project team;
å Useful information technology systems;
å ultural practices that encourage learning;
å esource dedication - especially in the form of
time, funding, and useful equipment. `·
÷
2
MFrom the trategic Planning nstitute¶s ùP)
ouncil on
enchmarking has developed the
following model:
1. Launch
2. prganize
3. each put
4. ssimilate
5. ct
`ü
werox 12-tep
enchmarking Process
M
|+
1. dentify what to benchmark;
2. dentify comparative companies;
3. etermine data collection method & collect
data.
M
`+
4. etermine current performance gap;
5. Project future performance levels.
M
¦+
6. ommunicate finding and gain acceptance;
7. stablish functional goals. `*
he werox 12-tep
enchmarking Process
ùcontinued)
M
D+
*. evelop action plans;
9. mplement specific actions & monitor progress;
10. ecalibrate benchmarks.
M
r+
11. ttain leadership position ;
12. Fully integrate practices into processes.
`o
÷
2
!"
#
Process pwner nvolvement ponsorship Uncertain
ustomer riven pbjectives morphous pbjectives
Linked to trategic Plan o trategic ntegration
est Practices & nablers Performance
etrics pnly
onsider ultural ttributes ³ ard´ ata pnly
isciplined
ethodology rbitrary / asual pproach
Quantum hange ncremental / o hange
lear Project Life ycle eep oing and oing and «..
ntegrated with xisting la carte Program
Quality fforts
¦
$
2
Mommit required resources to key projects;
MProvide focused training / facilitation to project
participants;
MProactively manage the direction and momentum of
benchmarking within the organization;
Mreate visibility of the benchmarking process;
Mecognize benchmarking team efforts.
¦|