Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I
VCR Engine with modification in Carburator”
Project Guide : Prof P.G.Sapre
Project Team Members
– Sanchit Godse
– Sagar Kadam
– Kunal Valecha
– Chetan Jagdale
– Abhishek Jangam
INTRODUCTION
• The design of our project is experimental and objective is to validate two
stroke S.I VCR (Simply Internal Variable Compression Ratio) engine with
modification in carburetor and cylinder head.
• In a two-stroke engine, the heat transfer from the engine to the cooling
system is less than in a four-stroke, which means that two-stroke engines
can be more efficient
LITERATURE SURVEY & REVIEW
• The students from BNCOE pusad college have done the same project on
VCR engine they got some improvement in performance in engine by
doing VCR modification, we have did same modification extended to
modification in carburetor and we got fabulous increment in performance
parameter
FABRICATION PROCESS
• WORKSHOP ORIENTATION
• STEEL ANGLE CUTTING
• ENGINE PLACEMENT CHECK ON ANGLES
• WELDING PROCESS
• ALIGNMENT CHECK
WORKING PRINCIPLE
• The working of this project is based on increasing the efficiency of the
engine.
• The overall process was discussed initially, planned and executed. Initially
we got an engine and built a frame for it.
• As the engine was framed, we checked the alignment of the same and
proceeded with the wiring. Initial check on petrol tank arrangement was
done before starting the engine.
• We took the initial values and its original efficiency. Readings were
considered for break power, fuel efficiency, compression ratio etc.
• We increased the head distance and compression ratio was increased and
changes were made in carburetor by implementing new jets (nozzle and
main jet)
• After many trials and errors while modifying the carburetor at last we
succeeded and could increase the output.
OBSERVATION
OBSERVATION TABLE FOR NORMAL CONDITION
𝟐𝝅×𝟓𝟓𝟎𝟎×𝑻
5.83 KW = 𝟔𝟎×𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎
T =10.07 N-m
NOW, TO CALCULATE MAX LOAD CAN BE TAKEN,
T=FORCE × DISTANCE
T= mg × r
10.07=m×9.81×0.035 meter
M=29.32 kg
𝒎𝒇×𝒑𝒇
MASS FLOW RATE OF FUEL = 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎×𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆
𝟎.𝟎𝟐𝟓×𝟕𝟏𝟗
=𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎×𝟎.𝟎𝟑𝟗𝟓
𝑩.𝑷×𝟑𝟔𝟎𝟎
NBTH = × 100
𝒎.𝒇×𝒄.𝒗
𝟎.𝟎𝟒𝟖×𝟑𝟔𝟎𝟎
= 𝟒𝟑𝟎𝟎𝟎×𝟎.𝟒𝟓𝟓𝟓 × 𝟏𝟎𝟎
= 1.54 %
RESULT & DISCUSSION
NORMAL CONDITION
3
Brake Thermal Efficiency(%)
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Load(kg)
RESULT & DISCUSSION
TESTING ON VCR 8.0
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
LOAD(KG)
RESULT & DISCUSSION
TESTING ON VCR + CARBURATOR
3
BRAKE THERMAL EFFICIENCY %
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
LOAD(KG)
RESULT & DISCUSSION
Validation Graph for Brake thermal efficiency (%) Vs Load (kg)
Validation Graph for Brake thermal efficiency(%) Vs Load(kg)
3
2.5
Brake Thermal Efficiency(%)
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Load(kg)
ADVANTAGES
• Simple in construction
• Cost less in Manufacture
• More Power
• Fuel Economy
• Low Maintenance
• High Output
• Easy Assembly
• Light Weight
APPLICATION