CRITICAL

READING
AS
REASONING PREPARED BY
Michelle M. Dumagan
 You have learned that as a critical
reader, you should be able to use
textual evidence when asked by your
teacher to support analysis of the
implicit and explicit information
presented by a writer in a text.
 Given the same text to other
readers, you may encounter questions
that will really require your answer. In
that case you should have the skills of
reasoning out and giving analysis and
evaluative statements.
 CRITICAL
READING
AS
REASONING
 WHAT IS

REASONING?
 According to Merriam-Webster
Dictionary, reasoning is an act of
giving statements for justification and
explanation. It is the ability of
someone to defend something by
giving out reasons.
ACTIVITY
TIME!
 CONVINCE ME!
The class will be grouped into three
(with more ore less 12 members
each).
We will test your reasoning skill by
convincing the judge through your
own reasons based on the situation
and the topic assigned to you.
 CONVINCE ME!
The teacher will provide three sets of
situations wherein all the groups will
take turns to be the judge and to be
the participant.
For example, on the first situation,
group 1 will be the judge and the
remaining two groups will be the one
to give their reasons.
 CONVINCE ME!
For every situation, each group will
only be given two minutes to brainstorm.
After brainstorming, one to speakers
will be allowed to convince the judges by
giving their own reasons.
After all the speakers have given
their reasons, the judge will give their
judgment based on the materials and the
reasons presented by each group.
READY
?
 FIRST SITUATION
Anna wants to have a movie date
with her family, which genre do you
think is better to watch?
GROUP 2 – HORROR
MOVIES GROUP 3 – ROMANTIC
MOVIES
GROUP 1 will be the judge.
 SECOND SITUATION
Juan is craving for sweets, which
is better for him to eat?
GROUP 1 – FRUITS
GROUP 3 – CHOCOLATES
GROUP 2 will be the
judge.
 THIRD SITUATION
Pasing wants to go on a vacation,
which tourist destination is better for
her to go to?
GROUP 1 –
PALAWAN GROUP 2
– BORACAY
GROUP 3 will be
the judge.
 PROCESS QUESTIONS
What did you feel while doing the
activity?
For the participants:
How did you come up with those
kinds of reasons?
For the judges:
How were you able to make sound
judgment?
FORMULATIN
G
EVALUATIVE
STATEMENT
S
WHAT IS AN
EVALUATIVE

STATEMENT
 EVALUATIVE STATEMENT
It is a way of giving a better
explanation to show the strength and
the weaknesses of something
through writing.
It presents a value judgment based
on a set of criteria.
 EVALUATIVE STATEMENT
It is used in giving a sound
judgement – a judgment that can be
backed up or supported by valid
reasons or proofs.
It is the writer’s way of explaining
why a strength is a strength and a
weakness a weakness based on the
evidences gathered.
 HOW TO
FORMULATE
AN
EVALUATIVE
STATEMENT?
 Evaluative statements about a
text are formulated after having read
the text carefully and critically,
grasping the essence of the text and
checking for possible fallacies in the
argument.
 The formulation of the evaluative
statements is done in the same way
you do any other writing except that
the statement is about your
judgement of the text’s content and
property.
 You may compose your evaluative
statements in two steps:
1. Formulating Assertions about the
Content and the Properties of a
text Read
2. Formulating a meaningful
counterclaim in response to a
claim made in the text read
FORMULATING ASSERTIONS ABOUT THE
CONTENT AND THE PROPERTIES OF A TEXT
READ

In this step, you have to examine

which ideas are facts or opinions, make
inferences or conclusions, and assess
the overall quality of the text. This
assertions usually contain evaluative
languages such as useful, significant,
important, insightful, detailed, up-to-
date, comprehensive, practical, etc.
FORMULATING A MEANINGFUL
COUNTERCLAIM IN RESPONSE TO A
CLAIM MADE IN THE
TEXT READ
Counterclaim is the opposition you
make about the claim of a writer.

You must recognize the value of

hedges when you state your
counterclaims.
FORMULATING A MEANINGFUL
COUNTERCLAIM IN RESPONSE TO A
CLAIM MADE IN THE
TEXT READ
A hedge is a word or phrase that
minimizes negative impact of a
criticism.
When you are presenting your
counterclaim, you are providing
criticism since you are stating that the
claim is not true. Hedge is used to give
a courteous tome in your writing.
FORMULATING A MEANINGFUL
COUNTERCLAIM IN RESPONSE TO A
CLAIM MADE IN THE
TEXT READ
Hedges could come in different
forms such as :
Modals – may, could, would, etc.
Frequency adverbs – usually,
generally, commonly
Probability adverbs – probably,
possibly, presumably
FORMULATING A MEANINGFUL
COUNTERCLAIM IN RESPONSE TO A
CLAIM MADE IN THE
TEXT READ
Obesity is caused by the bad
food choices being offered by
the food industry.

Obesity is probably caused by the

bad food choices being offered by the
food industry.