Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 158

SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

• Supply Chain Drivers


• Supply Chain Strategy
• Measuring Supply Chain Performance
• Push Strategy/Pull Strategy/Push-Pull Strategy
• Bullwhip Effect
• Outsourcing. 3PL and 4PL
• Design for Logistics
• Global Sourcing
• Mass Customization
SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

• Supply Chain Drivers


• Supply Chain Strategy
• Measuring Supply Chain Performance
• Push Strategy/Pull Strategy/Push-Pull Strategy
• Bullwhip Effect
• Outsourcing
• Design for Logistics
• Global Sourcing
• Mass Customization
A Framework for
Six Structuring Drivers

Role in Comp. Strategy Competitive Strategy

Role in Supply Chain Strategy


Supply Chain
Strategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Supply chain structure
Efficiency Responsiveness
Logistical Drivers

Facilities Inventory Transportation


Components
& Metrics
Information Sourcing Pricing

Cross FunctionalDrivers
Cross Functional Drivers
Three LOGISTICAL Drivers of Supply
Chain Performance
1) Facilities
– places where inventory is stored,
assembled, or fabricated
– production sites and storage sites
2) Inventory
– raw materials, WIP, finished goods within
a supply chain
– inventory policies
3) Transportation
– moving inventory from point to point in a
supply chain
– combinations of transportation modes
Three Cross Functional Drivers
of Supply Chain Performance
1) Information

 data and analysis regarding inventory, transportation, facilities


throughout the supply chain
 potentially the biggest driver of supply chain performance

2) Sourcing

 functions a firm performs and functions that are outsourced

3) Pricing

 Price associated with goods and services provided by a firm to the


supply chain

Facilities, Inventory, Transportation, Information, Sourcing & Pricing


1) Facilities
• Components of Facilities decisions
• Role in the supply chain
• Role in the competitive strategy
• Facility relates Metrics
Competitive Strategy

Supply Chain
Strategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Supply chain structure

Logistical Drivers

Facilities Inventory Transportation

Information Sourcing Pricing

Cross Functional Drivers


1) Facilities
Components of Facilities Decisions

• Location
– Various factors considered such as cost,
env, govt policy etc
– other factors to consider (e.g., proximity to
customers)

• Capacity (flexibility versus efficiency)

• Warehousing methodology (SKU


storage, job lot storage )
Facilities
• Role in the supply chain
– the “where” of the supply chain
– manufacturing or storage (warehouses)

• Role in the competitive strategy


If efficiency priority…
– economies of scale..centralisation

– If responsiveness priority…
– larger number of smaller facilities
Facility related metrics
• Capacity

• Utilization

• Storage cost per


unit

• Product variety

• Quality losses
2) Inventory
• Components of inventory decisions
• Role in the supply chain
• Role in the competitive strategy
• (Inventory related metrics.)
Competitive Strategy

Supply Chain
Strategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Supply chain structure

Logistical Drivers

Facilities Inventory Transportation

Information Sourcing Pricing

Cross Functional Drivers


Components of Inventory Decisions
• Cycle inventory
– Average amount of inventory used to satisfy
demand between shipments
– Depends on lot size

• Safety inventory
– inventory held in case demand exceeds
expectations
– costs of carrying too much inventory versus
cost of losing sales

• Seasonal inventory
– inventory built up to counter predictable
variability in demand
– cost of carrying additional inventory versus
Inventory: Role in the Supply Chain
• Inventory exists because of a mismatch
between supply and demand

• Source of cost and influence on


responsiveness

• Impact on
– material flow time: time elapsed between when
material enters the supply chain to when it exits
the supply chain
– throughput
• rate at which sales to end consumers occur
Inventory: Role in Competitive Strategy

• If responsiveness is a strategic competitive


priority,
……a firm can locate larger amounts of inventory
closer to customers

• If cost is more important,


….inventory can be reduced to make the firm more
efficient
3) Transportation
• Components of transportation decisions
• Role in the supply chain
• Role in the competitive strategy
• (Transportation related metrics)

Competitive Strategy

Supply Chain
Strategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Supply chain structure

Logistical Drivers

Facilities Inventory Transportation

Information Sourcing Pricing

Cross Functional Drivers


Components of
Transportation Decisions
• Mode of transportation:
– air, truck, rail, ship, pipeline, electronic
transportation
– vary in cost, speed, size of shipment, flexibility
• Route and network selection
– route: path along which a product is shipped
– network: collection of locations and routes
• In-house or outsource

Overall trade-off: Responsiveness versus


efficiency
Transportation - Role in the Supply
Chain
• Moves the product between
stages in the supply chain

• Impact on responsiveness and


efficiency

• Also affects inventory and


facilities
Transportation-Role in the Competitive Strategy

• If responsiveness is a strategic
competitive priority, ...
….faster transportation modes can provide
greater responsiveness to customers who
are willing to pay for it
• If cost is a strategic competitive priority, …
….use slower transportation modes for
customers whose priority is price
• Can also consider both inventory and
transportation to find the right balance
4) Information
• Components of information decisions
• Role in the supply chain
• Role in the competitive strategy
• Information related metrics
Competitive Strategy

Supply Chain
Strategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Supply chain structure

Logistical Drivers

Facilities Inventory Transportation

Information Sourcing Pricing

Cross Functional Drivers


Components of Information
Decisions
• Push (MRP) versus pull (demand
information transmitted quickly
throughout the supply chain)
• Coordination and information sharing
• Forecasting and aggregate planning
• Enabling technologies
– Internet
– ERP systems
– Supply Chain Management software
– RFID
Information - Role in the Supply
Chain
• The connection between the
various stages in the supply
chain – allows coordination
between stages

• Crucial to daily operation of each


stage in a supply chain – e.g.,
production scheduling, inventory
levels
Information - Role in the Competitive Strategy

• Allows supply chain to become


more efficient and more
responsive at the same time
(reduces the need for a trade-off)

• Information technology

• What information is most valuable?


Information related metrics
• Forecast horizon
• Frequency of update
• Forecast error
• Seasonal factors
• Variance from plan
• Ratio of demand variability to
order variability
5) Sourcing
• Components of sourcing decisions
• Role in the supply chain
• Role in the competitive strategy
• Sourcing related metrics
Competitive Strategy

Supply Chain
Strategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Supply chain structure

Logistical Drivers

Facilities Inventory Transportation

Information Sourcing Pricing

Cross Functional Drivers


Components of Sourcing Decisions

• In-house versus outsource decisions

• Supplier evaluation and selection

• Procurement process

Overall trade-off: Increase the supply


chain profits
Sourcing - Role in the Supply Chain

• Set of business processes required to


purchase goods and services in a
supply chain

• Supplier selection, single vs. multiple


suppliers, contract negotiation
Sourcing - Role in the Competitive Strategy

• Sourcing decisions are crucial


because they affect the level
of efficiency and
responsiveness in a supply
chain

• In-house vs. outsource decisions-


improving efficiency and
responsiveness
Sourcing related metrics
• Days payable outstanding
• Average purchase price
• Range of purchase price
• Average purchase quantity
• Fraction of on time deliveries
• Supply quality
• Supply lead time
• Supplier reliability
6) Pricing
• Components of pricing decisions
• Role in the supply chain
• Role in the competitive strategy
• Pricing related metrics

Competitive Strategy

Supply Chain
Strategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Supply chain structure

Logistical Drivers

Facilities Inventory Transportation

Information Sourcing Pricing

Cross Functional Drivers


Components of Pricing
Decisions
• Pricing and economies of scale

• Everyday low pricing versus high-low


pricing

• Fixed price versus menu pricing

Overall trade-off: Increase the


firm profits
Pricing - Role in the Supply
Chain
• Pricing determines the amount to
charge customers in a supply chain

• Pricing strategies can be used to


match demand and supply
Pricing - Role in Competitive Strategy

• Firms can utilize optimal


pricing strategies to improve
efficiency and responsiveness

• Low price and high product


availability; vary prices by
response times
Pricing related metrics
• Profit margin
• Days sales outstanding
• Incremental fixed cost per unit
• Incremental variable cost per unit
• Average sales price
• Average order size
• Range of sale price
• Range of periodic sales
A Framework for
Six Structuring Drivers

Role in Comp. Strategy Competitive Strategy

Role in Supply Chain Strategy


Supply Chain
Strategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Supply chain structure
Efficiency Responsiveness
Logistical Drivers

Facilities Inventory Transportation


Components
& Metrics
Information Sourcing Pricing

Cross FunctionalDrivers
Cross Functional Drivers
SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

 Supply Chain Drivers


• Supply Chain Strategy
• Measuring Supply Chain Performance
• Push Strategy/Pull Strategy/Push-Pull Strategy
• Bullwhip Effect
• Outsourcing
• Design for Logistics
• Global Sourcing
• Mass Customization
Business Elements
Structural Infrastructural
Difficult to change: Relatively easy to
change:
Business Elements
Structural Infrastructural
Difficult to change: Relatively easy to
– Buildings change:
– Equipment – People
– Computer systems – Policies
– Other capital assets – Decision rules
– Organizational structure
Definitions
• Business Strategy

• Functional Strategies

• Core Competencies
Definitions
• Business Strategy
Long-term master plan for the company;
establishes the general direction
• Functional Strategies
Further develop the business strategy in
segments of the business — must be aligned and
coordinated
• Core Competencies
Organizational strengths that provide focus
and foundation for the company’s strategies
A Top-Down Model of Business Strategy
Goals
Mission Business
Statement Strategy

Marketing R&D Operations Supply Chain Financial


Strategy Strategy Strategy Strategy Strategy

Operations and Supply Chain Decisions ...


Functional Strategy
• Translates the business strategy into
functional terms.
• Assures coordination with other areas.
• Provides direction and guidance for
operations and supply chain decisions.
Operations and Supply Chain Strategies
Design, operation, and improvement of the operations
and supply chain systems and processes
– What mix of structure and infrastructure?
– Is the mix aligned with the business strategy?
– Does it support the development of core
competencies?
Key Interactions
Finance MIS
Budgeting.
What IT solutions Human
to make it all work
Analysis.
together? Resources
Funds. Skills? Training?
# of Employees?
Design Supply Chain
Sustainability. and
Quality. Operations Marketing
Manufacturability.
What products?
Accounting What volumes?
Performance measurement systems. Costs? Quality?
Planning and control. Delivery?
Decisions Guided by the Structural Strategy
(Difficult to change)

Capacity Size?
Timing?
Type?
Facilities Size?
Location?

Technology Equipment?
Processes?
Information systems?
Vertical Direction?
Extent?
Integration
Decisions Guided by the Infrastructural Strategy
Relatively easy to change:

Organization Control/reward systems?


Centralization/decentralization?
Workforce – skilled/semi-skilled?
Sourcing and Supplier selection/performance metrics?
Purchasing Procurement systems?
Sourcing strategy?
Planning and Forecasting?
Control Inventory management?
Production planning/control?
Process and Quality Continuous improvement processes?
Business process management
SPC/Six Sigma
Product and Service Development process?
Design Organization/supplier roles?
How Big Retail Giants are managing SC during
heaviest on-line shopping
Encouraging shoppers to shop earlier & more often

Today’s leading retailers supplement traditional in-store shopping experiences


with a variety of convenient omnichannel fulfillment options, including buy on-line/
in-store pickup, a range of delivery speeds and add-on services (BOPIS)

Giving customers incentives to place orders in larger quantities or choose slower


shipping speeds can help retailers limit the cost and environmental
impact of split shipments.

Amazon Day delivery allows Prime members to choose a day of the week for their
orders to arrive together. This service lets Amazon ship items in fewer boxes and reduce
split shipments, gives customers greater control over the delivery timeline, and aims to
reduce the carbon footprint of the order.

While some retailers are closing stores, others recognize proximity to customers as an
asset and are saving up to 40% by fulfilling online orders in stores.
A Flurry of SC Innovations
-Experimenting with new technologies for last-mile delivery. CVS and Walgreens are bo
testing drone delivery to get orders to customers’ homes within minutes.

Automating microfulfillment and store operations. Walmart relies on self-service kiosks


which quickly retrieve customers’ online orders, to improve pickup time by 60%. South
Korea’s largest discount chain, Emart,has launched cashierless stores and an automated
concierge service via robots.

Using artificial intelligence (AI) for demand planning and inventory allocation. Retailers
such as Amazon and Stitch Fix are using predictive demand forecasting to estimate which
items customers will want and preemptively send inventory where it’s most likely to be
purchased.

Innovative supply chain solutions can create value for both


companies and customers, not only during the holidays but all
year long.
SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

 Supply Chain Drivers


 Supply Chain Strategy
• Measuring Supply Chain Performance
• Push Strategy/Pull Strategy/Push-Pull Strategy
• Bullwhip Effect
• Outsourcing
• Design for Logistics
• Global Sourcing
• Mass Customization
A Framework for
Six Structuring Drivers

Role in Comp. Strategy Competitive Strategy

Role in Supply Chain Strategy


Supply Chain
Strategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Supply chain structure
Efficiency Responsiveness
Logistical Drivers

Facilities Inventory Transportation


Components
& Metrics
Information Sourcing Pricing

Cross FunctionalDrivers
Cross Functional Drivers
Measuring SC Performance
Logistical Drivers Cross Functional Drivers
Measuring SC Performance
Logistical Drivers Cross Functional Drivers

 FACILITIES INFORMATION

• INVENTORY SOURCING

• TRANSPORTATION PRICING
Inventory related metrics
• Cash-to-cash cycle time
• Average inventory
• Inventory turns
• Products with more than a specified number of days
of inventory
• Average replenishment batch size
• Average safety inventory
• Seasonal inventory
• Fill rate (order/demands met on time)
• Fraction of time out of stock (Zero inventory)
• Obsolete inventory
Inventory turns
Inventory = Buffer = Cost
Hence the need to minimize

Effy of Supply Chain can be measured based on size of inventory investment


in the supply chain

Inventory Turnover = ??
Cost of Goods sold / Avg Aggregate Inventory Value
(Avg I/V Value = Total value of ALL items held in I/V..RM, WIP, FG, Distr I/V)

Grocery store…I/V > 100 times/yr


Mfg Firm ……….~ 6 to 7 times/yr

Weeks of supply = ??
(Avg Aggregate I/V Value / Cost of Goods sold) x 52 weeks
(how many weeks’ worth of I/V is in system at a particular point in time)
DELL COMPUTER

$
Net revenue 55,908 Mn
Cost of revenue 45,958
Prod Mtls on hand 327
WIP & FG on hand 247
Prod Mtls – days of supply 4

I/V Turnover = ??

Weeks of supply = ??
DELL COMPUTER

$
Net revenue 55,908 Mn
Cost of revenue 45,958
Prod Mtls on hand 327
WIP & FG on hand 247
Prod Mtls – days of supply 4

I/V Turnover = 45,958/(327+247) = 80 turns/yr

Weeks of supply = (1/80) x 52 = 0.65 week


Measuring SC Performance
Logistical Drivers Cross Functional Drivers

• FACILITIES INFORMATION

 INVENTORY SOURCING

• TRANSPORTATION PRICING
Transportation related
metrics
• Average inbound transportation cost
• Average incoming shipment size
• Average inbound transportation cost per
shipment
• Average outbound transportation cost
• Average outbound shipment size
• Average outbound transportation cost per
shipment
• Fraction transported by mode
SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

 Supply Chain Drivers


 Supply Chain Strategy
 Measuring Supply Chain Performance
• Push Strategy/Pull Strategy/Push-Pull Strategy
Bullwhip Effect
• Outsourcing
• Design for Logistics
• Global Sourcing
• Mass Customization
Supply Chain Strategies

• Push-Based Supply Chain

• Pull-Based Supply Chain

• Push-Pull Supply Chain


The Old Paradigm:
Push Strategies
• Production decisions based on long-term forecasts

• Ordering decisions based on inventory & forecasts

• What are the problems with push strategies?


– Inability to meet changing demand patterns
– Obsolescence
– The bullwhip effect:
• Excessive inventory
• Excessive production variability
• Poor service levels
Information Coordination: The Bullwhip
Effect
I- Consumer Sales at Retailer II-Retailer's Orders to Wholesaler
1000 1000
900 900
Consumer demand

800 800

Retailer Order
700 700
600 600
500 500
400 400
300 300
200 200
100 100
0 0
17
19
21
23
25

35
37
39
1
3
5
7
9

13
15

27
29
31
33

41
11

19

23
25
27
29
31
1
3
5
7
9

13
15
17

21

33
35
37
39
41
11
III-Wholesaler's Orders to Manufacturer IV-Manufacturer's Orders with Supplier
1000 1000

Manufacturer Order
Wholesaler Order

900 900
800 800
700 700
600 600
500 500
400
400
300
300
200
200
100
100
0
0
15
17
19

27

33
35
37
39
1
3
5
7
9

13

21
23
25

29
31

41
11

10

13

31

37
1

16

19

22

25

28

34

40
A Newer Paradigm:
Pull Strategies
• Production is demand driven
– Production and distribution coordinated with true customer demand
– Firms respond to specific orders

• Pull Strategies result in:


– Reduced lead times (better anticipation)
– Decreased inventory levels at retailers and manufacturers
– Decreased system variability
– Better response to changing markets

• But:
– Harder to leverage economies of scale
– Doesn’t work in all cases
Push and Pull Systems
• What are the advantages of push systems?

• What are the advantages of pull systems?

• Is there a system that has the advantages of


both systems?
A new Supply Chain Paradigm
• A shift from a Push System...
– Production decisions are based on forecast
• And from Pull System
• Production decisions based on demand

• …to a Push-Pull System


Push-Pull Supply Chains

The Supply Chain Time Line

Customers
Suppliers

PUSH STRATEGY PULL STRATEGY

Low Uncertainty High Uncertainty


Push-Pull Boundary
A new Supply Chain Paradigm
• A shift from a Push System...
– Production decisions are based on forecast
• …to a Push-Pull System ( Ind/Dep Demand)
– Initial portion of the supply chain is replenished
based on long-term forecasts
• For example, parts inventory may be replenished based
on forecasts
– Final supply chain stages based on actual
customer demand.
• For example, assembly may based on actual orders.
Consider Two PC Manufacturers:

• Build to Stock • Build to order


– Forecast demand – Forecast demand
– Buys components – Buys components
– Assembles computers – Observes demand
– Observes demand and – Assembles computers
meets demand if – Meets demand
possible.
• A traditional push • A push-pull system
system
Push-Pull Strategies
• The push-pull system takes advantage of the
rules of forecasting:
– Forecasts are always wrong
– The longer the forecast horizon the worst is the
forecast
– Aggregate forecasts are more accurate
What is the Best Strategy?

Demand
uncertainty
(C.V.)

Pull H

Delivery cost
Unit price

Push L

L H Economies of
Scale

Pull Push
What is the Best Strategy?

Demand
uncertainty
(C.V.)

Pull H

Delivery cost
Unit price

Push L

L H Economies of
Scale

Pull Push
What is the Best Strategy?

Demand
uncertainty
(C.V.)

Pull H

Delivery cost
Unit price

Push L

L H Economies of
Scale

Pull Push
What is the Best Strategy?

Demand
uncertainty
(C.V.)

Pull H

Delivery cost
Unit price

Push L

L H Economies of
Scale

Pull Push
What is the Best Strategy?

Demand
uncertainty
(C.V.)

Pull H

Delivery cost
Unit price

Push L

L H Economies of
Scale

Pull Push
What is the Best Strategy?

Demand
uncertainty
(C.V.)

Pull H

Delivery cost
Unit price

Push L

L H Economies of
Scale

Pull Push
What is the Best Strategy?

Demand
uncertainty
(C.V.)

Pull H

Delivery cost
Unit price

Push L

L H Economies of
Scale

Pull Push
What is the Best Strategy?

Demand
uncertainty
(C.V.)

Pull H

Delivery cost
Unit price

Push L

L H Economies of
Scale

Pull Push
Selecting the Best SC Strategy
• Higher demand uncertainty suggests pull

• Higher importance of economies of scale suggests push

• High uncertainty/ EOS not important such as


• the computer industry implies pull

• Low uncertainty/ EOS important such as


• groceries implies push
– Demand is stable
– Transportation cost reduction is critical
– Pull would not be appropriate here.
Demand
uncertainty

Pull
Delivery cost
Unit price
Push
Economies of
Pull Push Scale
Selecting the Best SC Strategy

• Low uncertainty but low value of economies of


scale , such as:
• high volume books and cd’s
– Either push strategies or push/pull strategies might be
most appropriate

• High uncertainty and high value of economies of


scale, such as:
– the furniture industry
– How can production be pull but delivery push?
– Is this a “pull-push”
Demand
system?
uncertainty
Pull
Delivery cost
Unit price
Push
Economies of
Pull Push Scale
What is the Best Strategy?
Demand
uncertainty
(C.V.)

Pull H

Delivery cost
Unit price

Push L

L H Economies of
Scale

Pull Push
Characteristics and Skills

Raw
Material Customers
Push Pull

Low Uncertainty High Uncertainty

Long Lead Times Short Cycle Times

Cost Minimization Service Level

Resource Allocation Responsiveness


Locating the Push-Pull Boundary
Demand
• The push section: uncertainty
– Uncertainty is relatively low Pull
– Economies of scale important Delivery cost
Unit price
– Long lead times
Push
– Complex supply chain structures: Economies of
• Thus Pull Push Scale
– Management based on forecasts is appropriate
– Focus is on cost minimization
– Achieved by effective resource utilization – supply chain optimization
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
• The pull section:
– High uncertainty
– Simple supply chain structure
Demand
– Short lead times uncertainty
• Thus Pull
– Reacting to realized demand is important Delivery cost
Unit price
– Focus on service level
Push
– Flexible and responsive approaches Economies of
Pull Push Scale
Locating the Push-Pull Boundary

• The push section requires:


– Supply chain planning
– Long term strategies
• The pull section requires:
– Order fulfillment processes
– Customer relationship management
• Buffer inventory at the boundaries:
– The output of the tactical planning process
– The input to the order fulfillment process.
Locating the Push-Pull Boundary
SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

 Supply Chain Drivers


 Supply Chain Strategy
 Measuring Supply Chain Performance
 Push Strategy/Pull Strategy/Push-Pull Strategy
Bullwhip Effect
• Outsourcing . 3PL and 4PL
• Design for Logistics
• Global Sourcing
• Mass Customization
Make or Buy?
INSOURCING/OUTSOURCING
“Make-or-buy” decisions
• Deciding whether to produce a product component “in-house”, or
purchase/procure it from an outside source.

• Issues to be considered while making this decision:

– Quality of the externally procured part………………………….?


– Reliability of the supplier in terms of both item quality and
delivery times………………………………………………………………..?
– Criticality of the considered component for the
performance/quality of the entire
product………………………………………….?
– Potential for development of new core competencies of
strategic significance to the company…………………………….?
– Existing patents on this item……………………………………………?
– Costs of deploying and operating the necessary infrastructure
……….?
A simple economic trade-off model for
the “Make or Buy” problem
Model parameters:
• c1 ($/unit): cost per unit when item is outsourced (item price, ordering
and receiving costs)
• C ($): required capital investment in order to support internal
production
• c2 ($/unit): variable production cost for internal production (materials,
labor,variable overhead charges)
• Assume that c2 < c1
• X: total quantity of the item to be outsourced or produced internally

Total cost as c1*X


u se
a function of X ho
In- C+c2*X

u rce
C
utso
O

X
Example: Introducing a new (stabilizing)
bracket for an existing product
• Machine capacity available

• Required “infrastructure” for in-house production


– new tooling: $12,500
– Hiring and training an additional worker: $1,000

• Internal variable production (raw material + labor) cost:


$1.12 / unit

• Vendor-quoted price: $1.55 / unit

• Forecasted demand: 10,000 units/year for next 2 years

Buy!
Analysing Strategic Outsource Decisions

• Option to make or buy is first presented at the


beginning of product life cycle during NPD

• Vertical integration to make or source material


can affect cost, flexibility and responsiveness.

• Lean manufacturing mindset is the trend


( lean firms increasingly buy more, make less)
Reasons for Buying (1/2)
• Organisation lacks managerial or technical expertise in the
production of the items or services in question
• Organisation lacks production capacity
• Certain suppliers have built such a reputation for
themselves that they have been able to build a real
preference for their component as part of the finished
product
• Challenges for maintaining long term technological &
economical viability for a noncore activity are too great
• A decision to make, once made, is often difficult to reverse
• Assures cost accuracy
• There are more options in potential sources and substitute
items
Reasons for Buying (2/2)
• Future forecasts show great demand or technological uncertainty & the
firm is unable or unwilling to undertake the risk of manufacture

• A highly capable supplier is available nearby

• Organisation desires to stay lean

• Buying outside may open up markets for the firm’s products/services

• Provides the organisation with the ability to bring a product or service to


market much faster

• A significant customer may demand it

• Encourages superior supply management expertise


Determination of the cost to
Make or Buy
A make-or buy cost analysis involves a determination of the cost to make an ite
and a comparison of this cost with cost to buy.
To Make
• Delivered purchased material costs
• Direct labour costs
• Any follow-on costs stemming from quality and related problems
• Incremental inventory carrying costs
• Incremental factory overhead costs
• Incremental managerial costs
• Incremental purchasing costs
• Incremental costs of capital

To Buy
• Purchase price of part
• Transportation costs
• Receiving & Inspection costs
• Incremental & inspection costs
• Any follow-on costs related to quality or service
OUTSOURCING (1/2)
• Outsourcing reverses a previous make decision. Thus an
activity, product, or service previously done in-house will next
be purchased.

• Almost no function is immune to outsourcing. The growth in


logistics outsourcing is attributed to transportation
deregulation, the focus on core competencies, reduction in
inventories, and enhanced logistics management computer
programs.

• The reasons for outsourcing are similar to those advanced for


the buy option in make-or-buy decisions. There is a key
difference.
“ What happens to the employees, space and equipment
previously dedicated to this product or service now
outsourced?”
OUTSOURCING (2/2)
Additional concerns
• Loss of control
• Exposure to supplier risks: financial, weakness, loss of
commitment, slow implementation, promised features or services
not available, poor quality, poor responsiveness
• Unexpected fees or “extra charges”
• Difficulty in qualifying economics
• Conversion costs
• Supply restraints
• Attention required by senior management
• Possibility of being tied to obsolete technology
• Concerns with long term flexibility and meeting changing business
requirements.
GROUP WORK # 10
• For your resp. companies, make a list of
components/items/services that may merit
buy with rationale

• Make a list of components/items/services that


you, as manufacturing manager would NOT
choose to buy and why.
Three Types of Strategic Alliances

• 1) Third Party Logistics (3PL)

• 2) Fourth Party Logistics (4PL)


1..Third Party Logistics (3PL)

• Use of 3PL providers to take over a company’s


logistics functions

• Almost a $200 billion industry by 2015

• 8% of all logistics costs attributed to 3PL

• eg of 3PL…A company with its own warehousing


facilities decides to employ external transportation
Evolution of 3PL
• 1980’s…many transportation and warehousing
firms developed into 3PL providers

• Early 1990’s…firms that specialised in express


parcel deliveries entered the markets

• Late 1990’s..companies originally specialising in


financial services, IT services & mgt consulting
entered the market by developing competence in
information systems and supply chain planning
Suppliers

Manufacturers

3PL

Distributors

Consumers
Services provided by 3PL’s
Service Some specific value
Basic Service
Category added services
Inbound, outbound by Track/trace, mode
Transportation
ship, truck, rail, airc conversion
Storage, facilities Cross-dock, in-transit merge,
Warehousing
management Inventory control

Provide & maintain Transportation management


Information
advanced information systems, Warehousing
Technology
systems management
Reverse Handle reverse flows Recycling, customer returns,
Logistics Repair/refurbish

Customs brokering, hazardous


Other 3PL
material, order taking,
Servces
consulting, port services etc.
3PL Advantages
• 1)Focus on Core Strengths
– Allows a company to focus on its core competencies
– Logistics expertise left to the logistics experts

• 2)Provides Technological Flexibility


– Technology advances adopted by better 3PL providers in a quicker, more cost-
effective way

3)Provides Other Flexibilities


– Flexibility in geographic locations/service offerings
3PL Disadvantages
• Loss of control inherent in outsourcing a particular
function.
– Outbound logistics 3PLs interact with a firm’s customers.
– Many third-party logistics firms work very hard to address these
concerns.
• 1)Painting company logos on the sides of trucks,
• 2) Dressing 3PL employees in the uniforms of the hiring company,
• 3) Providing extensive reporting on each customer interaction.

• Logistics is one of the core competencies of a firm


– Makes no sense to outsource these activities to a supplier who
may not be as capable as the firm’s in-house expertise
• Wal-Mart, pharmaceutical companies
2..Fourth Party Logistics (4PL)
• Manage & direct the activities of multiple
3PLs, serving as an integrator.

• Refinement on the idea of 3PLs

• 4PLs are not asset based like 3PLs


Functions provided by a 4PL Company

• PROCUREMENT

• STORAGE

• DISTRIBUTION
4PL

3PLs
Trucking 3PLs
Ocean Freight

3PLs
Cient 4PL Air Freight

3PLs
Warehousing

3PLs
Integrator

Integrator
Suppliers

Manufacturers

3PL 4PL

Distributors

Consumers
Integrator
4PL Types
• Synergy Plus operating model
(Partnership between 4PL – 3PL)

• Solution Integrator model


(Comprehensive supply chain solutions for a
single client)

• Industry Innovator model


(for multiple industry players )
Synergy Plus operating model

• Partnership between 4PL – 3PL to market supply


chain solutions
• Capabilities and market reach of both partners are
combined
• The 4PL provides:
 Technology
 Supply Chain strategy skills
 Capability to go to market
By program management expertise
Solution Integrator model

• Core Model: 4PL operates comprehensive


supply chain solutions for a single client

• Solution encompasses resources, capabilities


and technology of the 4PL with
complementary service providers
Industry Innovator model

• 4PL develops and runs a supply chain solution


for multiple industry players with focus on
synchronisation and collaboration

• This model provides the greatest benefits,


however it is complex and a great challenge
4PL Advantages
• Economies of scale
• Reduced Supply Chain costs
• Increased flexibility
• Combines the advantages of in- and out sourcing
• Manufacturers can focus on core competencies
• Improved customer service
• Reduced capital requirements
4PL Disadvantages
• Loosing sight of original core concept of
SCM due to loss of control
• Customer relationships should not be
dismissed on basis of efficiency
• Strict functional organisation structure
hinders integrated Supply Chains
• Resistance to change…the biggest obstacle
to implementation of new approaches
4PL Example

• Bicycle Importer

• Main function is to import and sell bicycles

• Need spare parts for these unique bikes

• A 4PL would manage the total logistic


operations for the spare parts business
Difference between 3PL & 4PL
• 4PL organisation is often a joint venture between a
primary client and one or more partners

• 4PL organisation acts as a single interface between


the client and multiple logistics service providers

• The major part of the client’s supply chain is


outsourced to the 4PL organisation
SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

 Supply Chain Drivers


 Supply Chain Strategy
 Measuring Supply Chain Performance
 Push Strategy/Pull Strategy/Push-Pull Strategy
Bullwhip Effect
 Outsourcing
• Design for Logistics
• Global Sourcing
• Mass Customization
Design for Logistics (DFL)
Design for Logistics (DFL)
• Strategy in SCM which involves product design to
reduce logistics cost.
• In 1957 Soda Can mfrs. switched from cone top soda
can to flat top soda can
• 3 Components:
– Product design should facilitate easy to ship & shelf
– Concurrent and parallel processing…..to save lead time
and lower inv.cost
– Standardization of parts …common parts for many
different products
Design for Logistics (DFL)
• Therefore design for logistics is a crucial
component in supply chain management.

• It is not just a mechanism to save costs but is


being consistently used as a  strategic weapon
to gain competitive advantage.
SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

 Supply Chain Drivers


 Supply Chain Strategy
 Measuring Supply Chain Performance
 Push Strategy/Pull Strategy/Push-Pull Strategy
Bullwhip Effect
 Outsourcing
 Design for Logistics
• Global Sourcing
• Mass Customization
Why Manufacture Globally?
80 Tn $
GLOBALISATION
Question : What is the truest definition of Globalization ?

Answer : Princess Diana's death.

Question : How come ?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Answer : An English princess with an Egyptian boyfriend crashes in a French


tunnel,

driving a German car with a Dutch engine,

driven by a Belgian who was drunk on Scottish whisky,

followed closely by Italian Paparazzis on Japanese motorcycles,

treated by an American doctor,

using Brazilian medicines !!!!!!!!!! (11)


GLOBALISATION
And moreover this is displayed to you by an Indian using
American technology,

and you're probably reading this on your iPhone or Android or


Windows phone or Blackberry, or on your DT!!

that use Taiwanese chips

and a Korean screen,

assembled by Bangladeshi workers

in a Singapore plant,

transported by Pakistani lorry-drivers....   (7)

That is Globalisation!!
20 Most Profitable/Largest Co’s
• 20 Most Profitable Co’s
• 20 Largest Co’s
Profit/day Profit/sec Industry Revenue
Mn $ $ Bn $
1. Aramco 304 3,500 1. Walmart Retail 514
2. Apple 163 1,900 2. Sinopec Oil/Gas 414
3. ICBC 123 1,400 3. Royal Dutch Shell --”-- 396
4. Samsung 109 1,265 4. China Nat Petro --”-- 392
5. China Con Bank 105 1,220 5. China State Grid Electricity 387
6. J P Morgan 89 1,030 6. Aramco Oil/Gas 355
7. Alphabet 84 975 7. BP --”-- 303
8. Agr Bank China 84 970 8. Exxon --”-- 290
9. BOA 77 890 9. Volkswagon Automotive 278
10. Bank of China 75 863 10. Toyota --”-- 272
11. Royal Dutch Shell 64 740 11. Apple Electronics 265
12. Gazprom 63 736 12. Berkshire Hathway Conglomerate 247
13. Wells Fargo 61 710 13. Amazon Retail 232
14. FB 60 701 14. United Health Healthcare 226
15. Intel 58 668 15. Samsung Electronics 221
16. Exxon 57 661 16. Glemcore Commodities 219
17. AT&T 53 614 17. McKenon Healthcare 214
18. Citigroup 49 572 18. Daimler Automotive 197
19. Toyota 47 538 19. CVS Health Healthcare 194
20. China Dev Bank 46 531
20. Total Oil/Gas 184
Why Manufacture Globally?
• Cost
• Access to raw-material
• New Markets
• Multi-Point Communication

Overall goal improvement in cash flows of the


parent firm to maximize shareholder wealth

Examples: Automotive parts, Forgings, Software Dev,


Healthcare, R&D….India //Mobile phones, clothing…China
Global Manufacturing Strategies
• Manufacturing Configuration
– Should manufacturing be centralized in one country or
should we have manufacturing facilities in specific zones to
service those zones or should we go multidomestic with a
facility in each country
– When should we have a centralized location?
– When should we go for multidomestic location?

• Coordination and Control


– Linking or integrating activities into a unified system is
called COORDINATION
– Defining organizational structure and reporting systems to
ensure timely implementation of policies is termed as
CONTROL
Global Manufacturing Strategies
• Plant Location Strategies
– Transportation costs, duties, proximity to
customers and suppliers, foreign exchange rate
risk, economies of scale in the production process,
government incentives, climate, technological
requirements of the manufacturing process.

• Plant Layout Planning Strategies


– Physical arrangement of economic activity centers
within a manufacturing facility
– Every manufacturing facility cannot have the same
type layout—local conditions such as cost of labor,
cost of land, local culture must be considered in
deciding about the plant layout
Global Sourcing Strategy

R&D, Manufacturing, and Marketing


Interfaces
Extent and Complexity of Global Sourcing Strategy
 Global Sourcing Strategy: the logistical
management of the interfaces of R&D,
manufacturing, and marketing activities on
a global basis, which determins a
company's competitive strengths and,
consequently, its market performance.
Global Sourcing Strategy

Competitive Comparative
Advantage Advantage

What activities Where to source


and technologies and market
Common examples of globally sourced products or
services
• Majority of companies today strive to harness the potential
of global sourcing in reducing cost. Hence it is commonly
found that global sourcing initiatives and programs form an
integral part of the strategic sourcing plan and procurement
strategy of many multinational companies:

• Labor-intensive manufactured products produced using low-cost


Chinese labor

• Call centers staffed with low-cost English speaking workers in the


Philippines and India,

• IT work performed by low-cost programmers in India and Eastern


Europe.
Firms heading home as benefits wane in China

• More companies from Europe and the United States


that outsourced production to China are returning
home as price gaps narrow.
 Philips NV, the Dutch engineering and electronics conglomerate,
improved automation and smarter robots meant it made more
sense financially to build a new factory in Drachten last year than
extend its operations in China.
 General Electric Co took arguably a bigger gamble by opting to
reshore some production from China to its Appliance Park in
Louisville, Kentucky, also in 2012.
– Such cases have become more common over the
past five years as more European and US
companies find it attractive to return jobs and
production home, a strategy known as reshoring.
TRADE SHIFT
SHIFTING GEARS
As mfg leaves China, Vietnam & India are benefitting the most in Asia

Share of US imports from


14 Asian LCC countries
50% Vietnam
9%
15% India
Lost
to: 12% Taiwan
22% Rest of LCC’s

From
China
China
69%
60%

042013 012019 LCC’s: Group of 14 low


cost countries in Asia
Advantages and disadvantages of global sourcing
 Some advantages of global sourcing:
Low cost;
Learning how to do business in a potential market;
Tapping into skills or resources unavailable domestically;
Developing alternate supplier/vendor sources to stimulate competition;
Increasing total supply capacity.
 Some key disadvantages of global sourcing:
Hidden costs associated with different cultures and time zones,
Exposure to financial and political risks in countries with emerging economies,
Increased risk of the loss of intellectual property
Increased monitoring costs relative to domestic supply.

For manufactured goods, some key disadvantages include long lead times, the risk of
port shutdowns interrupting supply, and the difficulty of monitoring product quality.
Trends in Global Sourcing Strategy
Trend 1: The Decline of the Exchange Rate
Determinism of Sourcing
Reasons:
1. It takes time to develop overseas suppliers for
noncost purpose.
2. Domestic suppliers are to increase prices to match
rising import prices following exchange rate
changes.
3. Many companies are developing long-term
relationships with international suppliers.
Trends in Global Sourcing Strategy
Trend 2: New Competitive Environment Caused by Excess Worldwide
Capacity
Key factors for Sourcing from Abroad

There has occurred a Very Important


strategic shift from 1.Better quality
2.Lower price
price and quantity to
3.Unavailability of items in the western
quality and reliability country
of products as a Important
determinant of 4. More advanced technology abroad
competitive strength: 5. Willingness to solve problems
6. More on-time delivery
7. Negotiability
8. Association with foreign subsidiary
Neutral
9. Geographical location
10. Countertrade requirements
11. Government assistance
Trends in Global Sourcing
Strategy
Trend 3: Innovations in and Restructuring of International
Trade Infrastructure
☆The innovations and structure changes that have
important influence on sourcing strategy are:
 improvements made in transportation and communication
 the increased number of purchasing managers experienced in
sourcing
 new financing options, including countertrade, offering new
incentives and opportunities for exports from countries without
hard currency
④ manufacturing facilities diffused throughout the world by globally
minded companies
⑤ neighboring country souring opportunities
Trends in Global Sourcing Strategy
Trend 4: Enhanced Role of Purchasing Managers
 In the past, just-in-time productions requires close
working relationships with component suppliers and
places an enormous amount of resposibilities on
purchasing managers.

 Now, purchasing managers are increasingly making long-


term commitments to foreign suppliers, direct dealings
with suppliers is justified. A survery shows that the
dominant form of purchasing from abroad was to buy
directly from foreign sources.
Trends in Global Sourcing Strategy
Trend 5: Trend toward Global Manufacturing

 During the 1980s, while U.S. companies continued to locate their


operations in various parts of the world, companies from other
countries such as Japan, Germany, and Britain expanded the
magnitude of their foreign manufacturing operations at a much
faster pace.

 In the late 1980s, U.S. companies increased sourcing from abroad,


which represents a strategic expansion and rationalization over
time.

 Foreign affiliates have developed more independent R&D activities


to manufacture products for the U.S. markets in addition to
expanding local sales.
Pattern in Decades
DECADE What Happened

1960’s USA the hottest story in world economy

1970’s USA gave way to Emerging Nations

1980’s Rise of JAPAN in world economy

1990’s USA again the leader in world economy

2000’s Emerging Nations make another strong run

2010’s USA again strong. Emerging Markets’ share of Global


economy declines (excl China & to some extent India)

2020’s USA complacent with rising govt deficit, spreading


corporate debts.
Pattern in Decades
• Decade after decade, this cycle plays out in such a
predictable way. After a good run, national leaders
grow complacent & spend irresponsibly. Businesses
run up debts.
• USA at the dawn of 2020’s is a complacent land
with rising govt deficit & spreading corp debts.
• On the other hand, emerging countries forced to
reduce deficits & debt, and enhancing reforms.
• Expect a comeback by smaller nations &
businesses in 2020’s
Pattern in Decades
With US & China battling, trade & investment shifting to
smaller countries incl Vietnam, Taiwan, Mexico etc.
Globalisation is thus gradually giving way to
Localisation, which makes this a promising time for
countries with domestic markets large enough to
support significant expansion in local businesses.

If the 2020’s were a golden age for the world’s largest


economy and its mega corporations, the 2020’s are
likely to be remembered as the decade when smaller
was beautiful again!!

SMALLER WILL BE BEAUTIFUL AGAIN !!


India…Happy New Decade
• Current Per capita GDP ~$2000/person (doubled in last decade,
better roads, airports, internet etc)
• USA $60,000/person, China $10,000/person
• By 2030 India ~ $5,000/person (no more poor country)
• By 2040 India ~ $12,000/person (semi-developed country)
• Bright decade for India, provided, provided that
• We as Indians & almost any govt in the centre is convinced that growi
Indian incomes is a worthwhile , top priority goal.
• Religion gets us going, caste gets us going, personality cults of leaders
get us going. But a burning desire to make every Indian affluent is not
something that gets us passionate

• Let’s resolve that in the next decade, we will keep reminding ourselv
& the govt to make economy a top priority…. $5000/person
SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

 Supply Chain Drivers


 Supply Chain Strategy
 Measuring Supply Chain Performance
 Push Strategy/Pull Strategy/Push-Pull Strategy
Bullwhip Effect
 Outsourcing
 Design for Logistics
 Global Sourcing
• Mass Customization
Mass Customization – How It Evolved
• Middle Ages – Craft Production
– Master Craftsmen and Apprentices
– One off products, high labour content, expensive

• 18th Century – Industrial Revolution


– Movement of people off land to towns and cities
– Sub-division of work  loss of traditional skills
Mass Customization – How it evolved
• United States – Industrial Development
started later, from mid-19th Century
– Industrial workers had greater skills

– More use of these skills in U.S. factories

– Development of Mass Production in early 20th


Century  U.S. becomes global power
Mass Production to Mass Customization
• Mass Production – example: Ford

– Division of work

– Low variety of output – ‘any colour as long as it’s black’

– Constantly rising volume sales, and lower input costs =


lower prices (economies of scale)

– Okay in permanently expanding economy with


favourable demographics
Mass Production to Mass Customization

• 1970’s – Slowing Economy – Rising Oil Prices

• Need for alternative approach

• 1970’s-1980’s – Increasing competition within U.S.


market from outside countries, esp. Japan

• Late 80’s-early 90’s: Literature proposing MC

• Development of internet (esp. product configuration


systems) in mid-1990’s opens door to widespread
use of Mass Customization
Evolution of MC
• Craft Production (Middle Ages)
Industrial Revolution ( 18th Century)
Industrial Development ( Mid 19th Century)
Mass Production ( Early 20th Century)
Mass Customization (Mid 1990’s)
Types of Mass Customization
• The Four Faces of Mass Customization –
……..Collaborative, Adaptive, Cosmetic, Transparent

– 1. Collaborative Customization:
• Consumer and producer engage in a dialogue to determine
customer requirements
• Computers, clothing and footwear, furniture, some services

– 2. Adaptive Customization:
• Product is designed so that users can alter it themselves to fit
unique requirements on different occasions
• High-end office chairs, R7 golf club, certain electronic devices
Types of Mass Customization
– 3. Cosmetic Customization:
• Product is unique in appearance only
• Customer’s chosen text or image on T-shirts, mouse mats, baseball
caps, mugs etc.
• Also called ‘Personalization’

– 4. Transparent Customization:
• Producer provides customized product without consumer being
necessarily being aware that it has been customized
• Can be used when consumer’s needs are predictable or can be
easily deduced, and when customers do not want their
requirements repeated.
• Example- repeat orders for customized clothing, chemicals
True Mass Customization
• True Mass Customization requires:
– System for customer to specify requirements easily e.g.
online ordering, call center

– Advanced manufacturing systems


• Enable economies of scope (keep cost and price low)

– Build-to-order approach
• product is not made until order is received

– Minimum order quantity of one


Advantages of MC
– Customer has control over product
– Does not have to pay for features he/she does not want
(computers etc.)
– ‘Not in your size’ becomes a thing of the past
– Company does not have finished product inventory 
better use of working capital
– Easier for company to differentiate product
– Levels out economic fluctuations
• When slowdown occurs, less backlog of inventory
• Prices do not have to be cut as much
• Therefore, less likelihood of recession
Examples of Mass Customization
• Dell
– Build to order computers

– Assembly, not manufacture (modular components)

– MC sometimes associated with higher prices but Dell


cheaper than most

– Why? Massive efficiency of supply chain management


Examples of Mass Customization
• Clothing and Footwear
– Clothing and footwear very suited to MC due to each
person being unique in size and shape

• Sports Equipment
– Treadmills

• Industrial equipment, construction


– Insulated roof and wall panels, made to order for size,
colour, insulation type
Three Principles for MC
1) Product should be designed such that it consists of
independent modules that can be assembled into
diff forms of the product easily and inexpensively…
Printers

2) Mfg & Service processes should be designed so that


they consist of independent modules that can be
moved or rearranged easily to support diff distribution
network designs….Asian Paints hardware & paint
stores
Three Principles for MC
3) The supply network should be designed to
provide 2 capabilities:
Must be able to supply the basic product
to facilities performing the customization in a
cost effective manner
Must have the flexibility & responsiveness
to take indiv customer’s orders and deliver the
finished, customized goods effectively
SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY

 Supply Chain Drivers


 Supply Chain Strategy
 Measuring Supply Chain Performance
 Push Strategy/Pull Strategy/Push-Pull Strategy
Bullwhip Effect
 Outsourcing
 Design for Logistics
 Global Sourcing
 Mass Customization
THANK YOU

Вам также может понравиться