Civil Procedure Code Criminal Procedure Code Public Interest Litigation On the basis of the remedies sought and the procedure followed, all laws can be grouped into two categories, namely, Civil Laws and Criminal Laws. Criminal law is concerned with wrongs against the community/State as a whole. While civil law is related to the rights duties and obligations of individual members of the community between themselves. Civil Law Civil Law includes a number of aspects which may be grouped under six or seven major headings such as family law, the law of property, the law of tort, the law of contract, the law relating to commerce and business, labour law, law of taxation etc. Criminal Law Criminal law is concerned with public wrongs or wrongs against the order and well being of the society in general. The persons guilty of such wrongs are prosecuted and punished by the State.
These wrongs are specific and are defined in the
Penal Code and a few other special and local laws. Criminal laws insist (apart from a few exceptional offences) on a particular intent or state of mind as a necessary ingredient of a criminal offence. Criminal Law On a procedural basis they are classified as cognizable and non-cognizable (cognizable are those in which the police can investigate or arrest persons without judicial warrant), bailable and non- bailable, compoundable or otherwise. Procedural Laws Most proceedings in the Supreme Court and the High Courts are governed by Rules of Procedure made by the Courts themselves under powers given by statute. The Civil and Criminal Procedure Codes and the Evidence Act do apply to judicial proceedings in these courts as well. Procedural Laws The writ procedure under Articles 32 and 226 is unique to these courts and is intended for the quick enforcement of Fundamental Rights whenever they are threatened by the State or its agencies. In such situations citizens can approach these courts even through a letter sent by post as the Supreme Court has declared that procedure should not be allowed to come in the way of dispensation of justice. Civil Procedure For the enforcement of civil rights and obligations a suit before a civil court is usually instituted. The procedures for trial and appeals including execution of decrees and orders are laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure. Valuation of suits for purposes of jurisdiction is made according to the Suits Valuation Act. The amount of court fees to be paid on plaints and appeals is determined by the Court Fees Act. The Limitation Act prescribes the periods of limitation with in which suits can be filed. The Evidence Act regulates the relevancy, admissibility and probative value of evidence led in courts, civil and criminal. The trial is in the nature of adversary proceedings where two parties oppose each other in a suit or action between parties. The procedure commences with ‘pleadings’, which set out the precise question in dispute or the cause of action. The opposite party (the defendant) may file a written statement to admit or deny the allegations in the plaint. The pleadings may be supplemented by the parties by making admissions of fact, answers and interrogatories, oral statements before the court and by admissions and denials of documents filed by them. The hearing of a suit commences with the serving of a copy of the plaint to the defendant. A party can appear himself in court for the hearing or make appearance through an agent or a pleader. According to the Advocates Act right to practice law before courts is given to Advocates only. In the proceedings, parties have to summon their witnesses for deposing in court. The trial involves recording of evidence of witnesses on a day-to-day basis at the conclusion of which judgment is to be pronounced in open court. Because civil proceedings are private matters, they can at any time be abandoned or compromised and, in fact, in a number of cases they are settled before trial. Judgments are enforceable through the authority of the court. Refusal to obey a judgment may lead to penal consequences; many decrees are open to appeal in higher courts within the specified period. Criminal proceedings are governed by the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the purpose of which is to determine whether the accused is guilty of the offence charged and, if so, to decide the punishment to be awarded therefore. It is designed to give every accused a 'fair trial' consistent with the constitutional commitment to individual liberty and freedom. A criminal proceeding involves four major stages, namely, investigation, prosecution, trial and disposition. Crimes being wrongs against society, the State undertakes the prosecution on behalf of the victim. The police on receiving information of the commission of an offence proceeds with the investigation. They are authorised to interrogate people, arrest the suspects (with warrant from the Magistrate in non-cognizable cases), search places for recovery of relevant materials, seize property connected with the crime and prepare a report on their findings for necessary action by the prosecuting authorities. Whenever arrests are made they are obliged to produce the arrested person before the nearest Magistrate within 24 hours. They are not to use 'third degree methods' in interrogation and confession given to police is not admissible as evidence in court. In all bailable cases they are bound to release the person on bail. The arrested person has right to seek the aid of a lawyer of his choice and he cannot be compelled to give evidence against himself. Under our law every accused is presumed innocent and the prosecution (the State) has to prove the guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If there is any doubt in the evidence or the prosecution, the benefit of doubt is given to the accused and he is acquitted. The defendant has the right to cross-examine every prosecution witness while he cannot himself be questioned unless he consents to be sworn as a witness in his own defence. In the case of indigent persons there is provision for legal aid at the State expense. If at the end of trial, the Judge finds him guilty, he has a right to be heard on the determination of sentence. The emphasis in modern criminal justice being reformation and rehabilitation, there is enough scope for a deserving convict to get correctional treatment as part of sentence. Public Interest Litigation Public interest litigation is legal action initiated in a court of law for the interest of public. It is strategic part of the legal aid movement and which is intended to bring justice within the reach of the poor masses. It is a totally different kind of litigation from the ordinary traditional litigation which is essentially of an adversary character where there is a dispute between two litigating parties, one making claim or seeking relief against the other and that other opposing such claim or resisting such relief. It is intended to ensure that violations of constitutional or legal rights of large number of people who are poor, ignorant or in a socially or economically disadvantaged position should not go unnoticed and unredressed. Otherwise, it would be destructive of the Rule of Law which forms one of the essential elements of public interest in any democratic form of Government. The State or public authority against whom public interest litigation is brought are generally interested and are on same line of argument as the petitioner, in ensuring basic human rights, constitutional and legal, to those who are in a socially and economically disadvantaged position. The state here gets an opportunity to rectify a wrong or to redress an injustice done to the poor and weaker sections of the community whose welfare must be the prime concern of the State. Characteristics of PIL Filed on behalf of group of people by a public spirited person or Civil Society Organization having bona fide interest in welfare of the people concerned. The group of concerned people, due to their social, economic and other impediments, are unable to approach the court for legal remedy. Enforcement of fundamental rights of these people who lack means of access to justice. Extending benefit of DPSPs read with FRs to these people who were denied the same or who need amelioration. Actions are sought against irresponsible and illegal acts/omission by the government. The Court may issue directions, fill in the gap of laws, order the government to take required action or to omit from doing certain lax act. There must not be private or vexatious interest involved. Conclusion Except civil, criminal and public interest litigation cases, there are other type of mechanisms provided under different laws. These laws have sui generis system; like Environment Protection Act, Juvenile Justice Act and Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, which not only have substantive but distinct procedural legal provisions. Special courts are established under these laws. There are a variety of adjudicative procedures followed in tribunals, quasi judicial administrative agencies, arbitration councils, nyaya panchayats etc. where private disputes are processed and settled through informal procedures. They are found to be cheap, expeditious and less cumbersome in terms of adjudication.