Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
GOOD GOVERNANCE ENTAILS
• Sound Public sector management.
• Efficiency
• Effectiveness
• And Economy
• Accountability.
• Legitimacy
• Government should have the consent of the governed.
• Accountability
• Ensuring Transparency.
• Being answerable for action and media freedom.
• Competence
• Effective policy making.
• Implementation and Service delivery.
INFLUENCE ON
Government ADMINISTARTION –NPM
1.Managerial orientation GLOBALIZATION
2. Managerial reforms 1. Removal of trade barriers
3. Larger collaboration 2.Entry of MNCs
between state, market and 3. Intensive application of IT
civil society-PPPs
Accountable
Consensus
oriented Transparent
Participatory Responsiv
e
1. Industry Initiatives
A formal effort was initiated by the Confederation of Indian
Industry when it produced in 1998, a document titled
‘Corporate Governance—A Desirable Code’ through a Task
Force headed by Rahul Bajaj.
A similar initiative was mounted by SEBI with the constitution of a
committee under the chairmanship of Kumar Mangalam Birla.
As a service to the corporate sector, the CII is putting together a
roster of independent directors from which companies can
choose their non-executive directors while constituting their
boards.
2. Corporate Initiatives
‘The legal framework for all corporate activities including
governance and administration of companies, disclosures,
shareholders’ rights, dividend announcements has been in place
since the enactment of the Companies Act in 1956 and has been
fairly stable. The listing agreements of stock exchanges have
also been prescribing on-going conditions and continuous
obligations to companies.
India has a well-established regulatory framework for more than
four decades, which forms the foundation of the corporate
governance system in India. Numerous initiatives have been
taken by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to
enhance corporate governance practice
• According to a survey on corporate excellence carried out
by Credit Lyonnais, three Indian companies—Infosys,
Hindustan Lever Limited and Wipro are amongst Asia’s
top ten corporations in terms of good governance
practices. Likewise, ICICI, Cummins India, HDFC,
Ranbaxy, Dr Reddy’s Lab, Orchid Chemicals and several
Tata group companies also share this honour.
• The Birla Group has already adopted corporate governance
provisions. Non-executive directors now dominate the
group’s company boards, and they have also constituted
nomination, remuneration and audit committees.
3. Individual Initiatives
There were some outstanding initiatives in India from individual
personalities even before the concept of corporate governance
gained currency. J. R. D. Tata, from the time he took over the
reins of the group till his death, ran the Tata industrial empire
professionally, unlike other family-run businesses.
Keshub Mahindra is another industrialist who like J. R. D. Tata
runs his empire professionally.
N. R. Narayanamurthy is the new icon and undisputed king of the
new economy.
Kumar Mangalam Birla who inherited a huge industrial empire
challenged the conventional practices within the group
companies when he took over in 1995.
4. Banks And Corporate Governance
The Basel Committee norms relate only to commercial banks
and financial institutions.
Realizing the importance of corporate governance to banks
which are highly leveraged entities whose failures would
pose large risks to the entire economic system, the Reserve
Bank of India formed an advisory group on corporate
governance that submitted its report in 2001 and another
called the consultative group of directors of banks/financial
institutions (known as the Ganguly Committee) which
submitted its report in 2002.
5. Initiatives Of The Department Of Company Affairs
In May 2000, the Department of Company Affairs invited a group of leading industrialists,
professionals and academics to study and recommend measures to enhance corporate
excellence in India. Some of the recommendations of the Task Force include the
following:
Greater role and influence for non-executive, independent directors.
Stringent punishment for executive directors for failing to comply with listing and other
requirements.
Limitation on the nature and number of directorship of managing and full-time directors.
Proper disclosure to the shareholders and investing community.
Interested shareholders to abstain from voting on specified matters.
More meaningful and transparent accounting and reporting.
Tougher listing and compliance regimen through a centralized national listing authority.
Highest and toughest standards of corporate governance for listed companies.
A code of public behavior for public sector units.
6. Setting Up Of Centre For Corporate Excellence
The Government of India has set up the Centre for
Corporate Excellence under the aegis of the Department
of Company Affairs as an independent and autonomous
body as recommended by the study group.
Cumulative effect of the companies achieving levels of
corporate excellence would undoubtedly be visible in the
form of much enhanced competitive strength of our
country in the global market for goods and services.
7. National Award For Excellence In Corporate Governance.
The national award for excellence in corporate governance,
instituted in 1999 by the Ministry of Finance under the
aegis of the Department of Company Affairs is sponsored
by Unit Trust of India.
For the very first year, the award was presented to Infosys.
For the year 2000, a panel chaired by Justice M. N.
Venkatachaliah and comprising eminent persons
unanimously selected The Tata Iron and Steel Limited
(TISCO) for the award.
8. Corporate Restructuring
It provides for initiation of restructuring of a corporate at a much earlier stage of
financial sickness, thereby enhancing the possibility of its revival.
With globalization and opening up of the economy, the need was felt that the
Indian market should be geared to face competition not only from within the
country, but from outside as well. Based on several recommendations, the
Competition Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha.
The Competition Bill, 2002, is a landmark development in economic legislation.
The government had set up a high-level committee to examine the existing
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act, 1969, for shifting
the focus of the law from curbing monopolies to promoting competition and to
suggest a modern competition law in line with international developments to
suit Indian conditions.
9. Best Practices
The law governing corporates has been fine-tuned by amending the
Companies Act to create the right ambience for the corporate
enterprises to function effectively in the era of liberalization.
The DCA has undertaken an ambitious programme to completely
overhaul its services to the corporate sector by undertaking
modernization and placing the services on the Internet. This is
being undertaken with a view to reducing the time and resources
spent by corporates.
As mentioned earlier, Naresh Chandra Committee was set up to look
into issues relating to auditor-company relationship such as
rotation of auditors/auditing partners, restrictions on non-audit
work/fees, procedures for appointment of auditors, determination
of audit fees, the role of independent directors and disciplinary
procedures for accountants.
CONCLUSION