Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Tony S. Djajakusumah
Fakultas Kedokteran Unisba
What is literature?
• "a body of written works"
(Encyclopedia Britannica )
Scientific literature:
• Proceedings
Collection of printed articles (in book form) that have been presented in a
scientific conference or symposium
• Patents...
Types of literature
Secondary Literature (secondary sources) :
• Before you open a single database or type one keyword, you must
plan your search.
• It doesn’t matter if you are conducting a full systematic review or if
you are conducting a systematic search for a literature review or a
discussion paper, either way you need to have a clear question and a
systematic plan of attack.
• Without this, your search is disjointed and therefore takes longer, you
will miss important articles and your conclusions will be questioned by
your peers as potentially biased.
Formulate the question
The first and most important step in developing a search strategy is to
formulate a clear question.
• What do you want to know?
• Who are you interested in?
• Where and when are you interested in?
• What treatment type?
• Are there alternatives to that treatment?
• Are you interested in those as well, or do you want to exclude them?
You need to have a clear and focused question to ensure
you get the most specific evidence with the least effort.
Example Question: How well does a random urine protein to
creatinine ratio diagnose proteinuria versus a 24-hour urine
collection for protein?
• P (population): the demography of the population (age, gender, race) the
problem of the population (condition or diagnosis or symptoms)
• e.g. people with diabetes
• I (intervention): what is the treatment under investigation
• e.g. random urine protein to creatinine ratio
• C (comparator): comparison of intervention (specific: weight bearing
exercise) alternative interventions (broad: any other treatment) control
(nothing)
• e.g. 24-hour urine collection for protein
• O (outcome): change in symptoms of the population reason for using the
exposure
• e.g. diagnosis of proteinuria
Example question: Is acupuncture, compared with hypnosis, a
successful intervention to use to stop teenagers smoking?
P (population):
the demography of the population (age, gender, race) the problem of the population (condition or
diagnosis or symptoms) e.g. teenagers
E (exposure):
who delivered the exposure (intervention/treatment)
how the exposure was delivered (frequency, dosage)
where the exposure was delivered (hospital, community centre)
what the exposure was (massage, splinting, exercises) e.g. acupuncture
C (comparator):
comparison intervention (specific: weight bearing exercise)
alternative interventions (broad: any other treatment)
control (nothing)
e.g. hypnosis
O (outcome):
change in symptoms of the population reason for using the exposure
e.g. smoking behaviour
T (time period):
short term, long term, not specified, actual time specified (i.e. 6 months, 2 years)
Define the concepts and develop keywords.
The following databases are free access, and contain evidence based
healthcare articles from specific healthcare professions.
• OT Seeker (resources relevant to occupational therapy interventions)
http://www.otseeker.com/
• PEDro (The Physiotherapy Evidence Database)
http://www.pedro.org.au/
• SpeechBITE (Speech Pathology Database for Best Interventions and
Treatment Efficacy)
http://www.speechbite.com/
MEDLINE Why use it?
• Good coverage of wide range of clinical medical topics
• One of the longest periods of coverage: from 1966, with over 15 million records
• Very strong and widely recognised controlled thesaurus of MeSH (Medline Subject
Headings) for good relevancy of results. Transparent navigation of MeSH terms allows
searcher to ‘see inside’ the organisation of the database
• Ovid interface has excellent search refining tools, and several save options including auto-
alert
Bear in mind...
• Long indexing delay: 3 to 6 months for complete records (Pre-medline helps to overcome
this)
• Very large: over 11 million records, so requires sifting through results
• Of the biomedical, science and social science databases one of the weaker ones for
psychiatry and psychology
• Journal coverage weighted toward North American titles
• Does not usually index publications other than journal articles
EMBASE
Why use it?
• Good coverage of wide range of clinical medical topics, but particularly
strong in pharmacology and psychiatry when compared with Medline.
• Good European journal coverage
• Well structured controlled thesaurus (Emtree) for good relevancy of results
• In addition to journal articles, covers meetings, conferences and symposia
• Shorter Indexing delay than Medline: 4 to 8 weeks
BUT
• Coverage: 1980 to present
EMBASE
• List of journal titles in Embase
• Embase provides unparalleled coverage of the biomedical literature,
with 32 million+ records from almost 8,300 currently published
journals. Embase includes six million+ records and 2,900 + journals
that are not covered by MEDLINE. Also, Embase Classic provides
access to data going back to 1947.
• Download the full list of journal titles in Embase (XLSX, 912kb). If you
would like to suggest a journal title for inclusion in our database,
please let us know by filling in the form.
Google
Scholar
Can do an
advanced
search
Title links to
abstract and
possible source of
full text
“Find it with
OLinks” links to
full text version
Link to articles
that cited the
work
Link to related
articles
BGSU Library
Homepage
1. Academic
Search
Complete
2. Search by
journal
name
3. BGSU
catalog
4. OhioLINK
Academic
Search
Complete
Type in search
word
Limit by context
(author, title,
etc)
Number of times
cited in
database
Narrow by
subject
Find It!
Provides links
to full text
version of
articles
CHECK
DATES!!!!
Pick a book
and click on
title
EVALUATION
You need to evaluate each article to make sure they are relevant to your
topic/needs. i.e.:
• Display the search results on the screen
• Does the paper cover the correct topic?
• You are guaranteed to find at least one totally irrelevant paper in every search you do.
• Is the information recent enough?
• Did you specify a date range?
• Does it match the type of information you wanted
• Qualitative, quantitative, research design?
• Is it from a primary or secondary source?