Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
10/16/2020
470 SECTION
7 SCHEDULE
REPEALED OLD ACT OF 1956
A GREAT REFORM IN LAW TAKEN PLACE IN 2013 BY ENACTING NEW COMPANIES ACT 2013 AND END
OF COMPANY ACT 1956
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
MANY THINGS INTRODUCED IN NEW
ACT OR INTRODUCED IN NEW WAYS
• Introduction
• Key definitions and concepts
• Company
• Management and administration
• Directors
• Accounts and audit
• Dividend
• Compromises, arrangements and amalgamations
• Revival and rehabilitation of sick companies
• Corporate social responsibility
• Implications on private companies
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Compliance Need to
Annual return
Complete
Place of keeping registers and returns
General meetings
Inform to ROC for each and every moments of company
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Who own or work
Director
for Company
Woman director
Independent directors
additional director
Board of Director
Audit Committee
Books of accounts
accounting standards
Financial year
Audit and auditors & Appointment of auditors
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
CSR & M&A
The 2013 Act makes an effort to introduce the culture of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Indian
corporates by requiring companies to formulate a corporate social responsibility policy and at least incur
a given minimum expenditure on social activities.
The 2013 Act has streamlined as well as introduced concepts such as reverse mergers (merger of
foreign companies with Indian companies) and squeeze-out provisions, which are significant. The 2013
Act has also introduced the requirement for valuations in several cases, including mergers and
acquisitions, by registered valuers.
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
How Company
Grow or earn or
need fund
Declaration of dividend
Share
Debenture
IPO
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Corporate Social Responsibility (Sec. 135)
Every Company
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES 9
Corporate Social Responsibility (Sec. 135)
Functions of CSC
Formulate Corporate Social Responsibility Policy (CSRP)
Recommend Expenditure for (CSRP) activities
Monitor policy from time to time
CSR Expenditure
CSR projects or programs undertaken in India only shall amount to CSR Expenditure
5% of CSR expenditure towards personnel & agencies implementing CSR is allowed
Is CSR mandatory?
If the company fails to spend such amount , the Board shall specify the reasons for not spending the
amount
Is CSR Deductible expenditure under Income Tax Act?
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES 10
Types of companies- Limited by Shares
(from regulatory perspective)
Company
Charitable Charitable
Company(Sec 8) Company(Sec 8)
Holding/Subsidiary Holding/Subsidiary
Company Company
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES 1
1
COMPANY TYPE
• One-person company: The 2013 Act introduces a new type of entity
to the existing list i.e. apart from forming a public or private limited
company, the 2013 Act enables the formation of a new entity a
‘one-person company’ (OPC). An OPC means a company with only
one person as its member [section 3(1) of 2013 Act]
• Private company: The 2013 Act introduces a change in the definition
for a private company, inter-alia, the new requirement increases
the limit of the number of members from 50 to 200. [section 2(68)
of 2013 Act].
• Small company: A small company has been defined as a company,
other than a public company. (i) Paid-up share capital of which does
not exceed 50 lakh INR or such higher amount as may be
prescribed which shall not be more than five crore INR (ii) Turnover
of which as per its last profit-and-loss account does not exceed two
crore INR or such higher amount as may be prescribed which shall
not be more than 20 crore INR: As set out in the 2013 Act, this
section will not be applicable to the following: • A holding company
or a subsidiary company • A company registered under section 8 •
A company or body corporate governed by any special Act [section
2(85) of 2013 Act]
10/16/2020
• Dormant company: The 2013 Act states that a company can be classified as dormant when it is
formed and registered under this 2013 Act for a future project or to hold an asset or intellectual
property and has no significant accounting transaction. Such a company or an inactive one may apply
to the ROC in such manner as may be prescribed for obtaining the status of a dormant company.
[Section 455 of 2013 Act]
• Associate companyIt includes joint ventures • Significant influence is defined to mean ‘control … of
business decisions under an agreement’ • It differs from the definition of an associate as per the
Accounting Standard 23: Accounting for Investments in Associates in Consolidated Financial
Statements • The status of an associate and a joint venture cannot be equated since, the degree of
control that a company can exercise in such entities, varies significantly. While ‘joint control’ is the
driving factor in case of joint ventures, a company can at the most only ‘participate’ in the operating
or financing decisions in case of an associate company. • With regard to the explanation to the section
in the 2013 Act, which defines the term ‘significant influence, it is to be noted that if a company has
‘control’ [control has been defined in section 2(27) of the 2013 Act] with respect to business decisions
of another company, such other company will in fact be tantamount to a subsidiary and not an
associate company. Hence, the use of the term ‘control’ within the definition of significant influence
leads to a conflict between the two definitions (associate company and subsidiary company).
• “Government company” means any company in which not less than fifty-one per cent of the paid-up
share capital is held by the Central Government, or by any State Government or Governments, or
partly by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments, and includes a
company which is a subsidiary company of such a Government company;
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Distinction Private Company Public Company
Minimum Paid-up Capital 1 Lakh 5 Lakh
Minimum Number of 2 7
Members
Maximum Number of 50 No restriction
Members
Transerferability of shares Complete Restriction No Restriction
Type of Directors
Managing Directors (MD)
Whole Time Director (WTD)
Non Executive Director (NED)
Independent Director (ID)
Board Strength
No of Directors
Type of Companies
Minimum Maximum#
Public Company 3 15
Private Company 2 15
One Person Company 1 15
# By a special resolution maximum strength can be increased (CG approval not required)
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Board of Directors & Key Management Persons
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Board of Directors & Key Management Persons
Listed Public Company • At least one-third of the total number of directors shall be Independent Directors
Intermittent vacancy to be filled up by the Board not later then immediate board meeting or 3 months from
vacancy
Not entitled to Stock Options
Remuneration – Only by way of fee, profit related commission (as approved by members) and reimbursement of
expenses
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Board of Directors & Key Management Persons
Independent Directors (ID)
Term of Office:
hold office for a term up to 5 consecutive years
Maximum 2 consecutive terms allowed
Eligible for being appointed again after a rest period of 3 years, however, subject to conditions
Such appointment only when the director’s absence from India is for a period not less than three months
Alternate director for an independent director – Can be appointed only if he is qualified to be appointed as an
independent director under the provisions of this Act
Term of Office:
For period permissible to original director or up to the date of return of the original director to India
Provisions relating to automatic re-appointment of retiring directors not applicable
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Board of Directors & Key Management Persons
Contravention of said provisions to attract fine not less than five thousand but which may extend up to Rs 25,000
for every day of default
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Winding Up of Company
This includes the following: -
• By the court
• Under the supervision of the court
• Voluntary
• As against the existing modes of winding-up as prescribed by the 1956 Act, the 2013 Act prescribes
the following two modes: - By the Tribunal - Voluntary • The 2013 Act does not acknowledge the
distinction between members voluntarily winding-up and creditors voluntarily windingup. Additionally,
the new grounds for winding-up by Tribunal are as follows: - In a situation when the company has
acted against the interests of sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state, friendly
relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality - Order has been made under Chapter
XIX (Revival and Rehabilitation of Sick Companies). - An application has been made by the ROC or
any other person authorised by the central government by a notification under the 2013 Act. - The
tribunal is of the opinion that the affairs of the company have been conducted in a fraudulent manner
or the company was formed for fraudulent and unlawful purposes or the persons concerned in the
formation or management of its affairs have been found guilty of fraud, misfeasance or misconduct in
connection therewith, and that it is proper that the company be wound up - The company has made a
default in filing with the ROC, its financial statements or annual returns for immediately preceding five
consecutive financial years
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Board of Directors & Key Management Persons
Contravention of the said provisions are liable to fine, not less than 1 lakh rupees but which may extend to
5 lakh rupees
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Annual General Meeting (Sec. 96)
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Notice of AGM (Sec. 101)
Notice (21 clear days) can be given through electronic mode also, apart from written notice
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
MOA
Name Clause
Object Clause
Liability Clause
Association Clause
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
AOA
Company Name
Shareholder Meetings
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Things Come in AOA
• valuation of intellectual rights say, the valuations of the IPR of one partner and, in a similar way as
how we value real estate of another partner
• the appointments of directors – which shows whether a shareholder dominates or shares equality with
all contributors
• directors meetings – the quorum and percentage of vote
• management decisions – whether the board manages or a founder
• transferability of shares – assignment rights of the founders or other members of the company do
• special voting rights of a Chairman, and his/her mode of election
• the dividend policy – a percentage of profits to be declared when there is profit or otherwise
• winding up – the conditions, notice to members
• confidentiality of know-how and the founders’ agreement and penalties for disclosure
• first right of refusal – purchase rights and counter-bid by a founder
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
MOA/AOA
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
SHARE /
DEBENTURE
2. Forgery-
Doctrine of indoor management does not apply to forgery because forgery is voidab- initio.
The plaintiff contended that whether the signatures were genuine or forged was a part of internal
management and, therefore, the company should be estopped from denying genuineness of document.
But it was held that the rule has never been extended to cover such a complete forgery.
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Doctrine of
Constructive
Notice-
The memorandum and articles of association of every company are registered with the Registrar of
Companies. The office of the Registrar is a public office and consequently the memorandum and articles
become public documents. They are open and accessible to all. It is therefore, the duty of every person
dealing with a company to inspect its public documents and make sure that his contract is in conformity
with their provisions. But whether a person actually reads them or not, he is to be in the same position
as if he had read them. He will be presumed to know the contents of those documents.
Another effect of this rule is that a person dealing with the company is taken not only to have read those
documents but to have understood them according to their proper meaning. He is presumed to have
understood not merely the company’s powers but also those of its officers. Further, there is a
constructive notice not merely of the memorandum and articles, but also of all the documents, such as
special resolutions [S. 117] and particulars of charges [S. 77] which are required by the Act to be
registered with the Registrar. But there is no notice of documents which are filed only for the sake of
record, such as returns and accounts. According to Palmer, the principle applies only to the documents
which affect the powers of the company.
The common law doctrine of constructive notice should apply to the form. To reiterate the form is a
public document which contains particulars of directors who are the mind and will of a company, as well
as managers and secretaries who are responsible for the day to day running of the company. It is a
document which affects the powers of the company and its agents. Certainly, its purpose must be more
than just to provide information about the company’s directors, managers and secretary. Therefore,
persons dealing with company should check with the Registrar of Companies who its directors, mangers
and secretaries are at given time.
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Doctrine of Ultra
Vires
The term Ultra Vires means ‘Beyond Powers’. In legal terms, it is applicable only to the
acts performed in excess of the legal powers of the doer. This works on an assumption
that the powers are limited in nature. Since the Doctrine of Ultra Vires limits the
company to the objects specified in the memorandum, the company can be:
Restrained from using its fundsn for purposes other than those specified in the
Memorandum
Restrained from carrying on trade different from the one authorized
The company cannot sue on an ultra vires transaction. Further, it cannot be sued too. If
a company supplies goods or offers service or lends money on an ultra vires contract,
then it cannot obtain payment or recover the loan.
However, if a lender loans money to a company which has not been extended yet, then
he can stop the company from parting with it via an injunction. The lender has this right
because the company does not become the owner of the money as it is ultra vires to the
company and the lender remains the owner.
Further, if the company borrows money in an ultra vires transaction to repay a legal loan,
then the lender is entitled to recover his loan from the company.
Sometimes an act which is ultra vires can be regularized by the shareholders of the
company. For example,
If an act is ultra vires the power of directors, then the shareholders can ratify it.
If an act is ultra vires the Articles of the company then the company can alter the
Articles.
Remember, you cannot bind a company through an ultra vires contract. Estoppel,
acquiescence, lapse of time, delay, or ratification cannot make it ‘Intravires’.
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Rights of minority
shareholders
Definition of minority shareholders
Minority shareholders are the equity holders of a firm who does not enjoy the voting power of the firm
by the virtue of his or her below 50% ownership of the firm’s equity capital.
Rights of Minority Shareholders
Many provisions of Companies Act, 2013 deals with the situations where minority shareholders rights
have been protected and the same can be divided into various major heads. The rights of minority
shareholders are discussed below.
Oppression and Mismanagement
In Companies Act, 1956, the protection for the minority shareholders from oppression and
mismanagement have been provided under section 397 (An Application to be made to company law
board for relief in cases of oppression) and 398 (An Application to be made to company law board for
relief in cases of oppression).
Therefore, right to apply to the company board for the oppression and mismanagement is provided
under the Section 399, which is, meeting 10% of shareholding or hundred members or one-fifth
members limit. However, central government under their discretionary powers has allowed any numbers
of shareholders to apply for the company board for the relief under Sections 397 and 398.
Whereas, on the other hand, under Companies Act, 2013, the relief from the oppression and
mismanagement has been provided under Section 241-246 where the relief can be sought from the
tribunal in case of mismanagement and oppression through section 244(1) which provides the right to
apply to tribunal with the same minority limit mentioned in Companies Act, 1956 but however, the
tribunal, while exercising discretionary powers, may allow any numbers of shareholders and to be
considered as minority.
Further, under the Section 245, Companies Act, 2013, the new concept of class action has been
introduced which was non-existent in Companies Act, 1956 wherein it provides for class action suits to
be instituted against the company as well as against the auditors of the company.
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
Lifting of the
Corporate Veil
This theory of corporate entity is indeed the basic principle on which the whole
law of corporations is based. Instances are not few in which the Courts have
successfully resisted the temptation to break through the corporate veil.
But the theory cannot be pushed to unnatural limits. “There are situations
where the Court will lift the veil of incorporation in order to examine the
‘realities’ which lay behind. Sometimes this is expressly authorized by
statute…and sometimes the Court will lift its own volition”. The human
ingenuity however started using the veil of corporate personality blatantly as a
cloak for fraud or improper conduct. Thus it became necessary for the Courts
to break through or lift the corporate veil and look at the persons behind the
company who are the real beneficiaries of the corporate fiction.
Lifting of the corporate veil means disregarding the corporate personality and
looking behind the real person who are in the control of the company. In other
words, where a fraudulent and dishonest use is made of the legal entity, the
individuals concerned will not be allowed to take shelter behind the corporate
personality. In this regards the court will break through the corporate shell
and apply the principle of what is known as “lifting or piercing through the
corporate veil.” And while by fiction of law a corporation is a distinct entity,
yet in reality it is an association of persons who are in fact the beneficial
owners of all the corporate property.
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES
How to
Incorporate A
Company
LUNIA LAW
10/16/2020 ASSOCIATES