Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Equity
SELF-INTEREST AND THE
SOCIAL INTEREST
People are constantly striving to get more out of their scarce
resources – you make choices that further your self-interest.
Markets coordinate ones decisions along with those of
everyone else
Are market outcomes fair outcomes? Do markets enable us to
allocate resources in the social interest?
Does the market achieve an efficient and fair use of resources?
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
METHODS
Resources might be allocated by:
Market price
Command
Majority rule
Contest
First-come, first-served
Lottery
Personal characteristics
Force
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
METHODS
Market price
When a market price allocates a scarce resource, then people who are willing and
able to pay that price get the resource
Command
A command system allocates resources by the order (command) or someone in
authority
Majority rule
Allocates resources in the way that a majority of voters choose
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
METHODS
Contest
Allocates resources to a winner (or a group of winners). Sporting events use this
method
First-come, first-served
Allocates resources to those who are first in line
Lottery
Allocates resources to those who pick the winning number, draw the lucky cards, or
come up lucky on some other gaming system.
DEMAND, MARGINAL
BENEFIT, AND CONSUMER
SURPLUS
Demand, willingness to pay, and value
The value of one more unit of a good or service is its marginal benefit, which we can
measure as maximum price that a person is willing to pay.
Willingness to pay determines demand.
A demand curve is a marginal benefit curve.
DEMAND, MARGINAL
BENEFIT, AND CONSUMER
SURPLUS
Individual demand and market demand
The relationship between the price of a good and the quantity demanded by one person is
called individual demand
The relationship between the price of a good and the quantity demanded by all buyers is
called market demand
The market demand curve is the horizontal sum of the individuals demand curve as shown
in Figure 5.1
INDIVIDUAL DEMAND Figure 5.1
SURPLUS
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET EFFICIENT?
Efficiency of competitive equilibrium
A competitive market creates an efficient allocation of resources at equilibrium.
In equilibrium, the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied.
AN EFFICIENT MARKET
FOR PIZZA
Price (dollars per pizza)
Figure 5.5(a)
Consumer S
25 surplus
20
Equilibrium
15
10
5 Producer
Equilibrium
surplus quantity
D
0 5 10 15 20
Quantity (thousands of pizzas per day)
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET EFFICIENT?
At the equilibrium quantity, marginal benefit equals marginal cost, so the quantity is the
efficient quantity.
The sum of consumer and producer surplus is maximised at this efficient level of output.
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET EFFICIENT?
The invisible hand
Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” idea in the Wealth of Nations implied that competitive
markets send resources to their highest valued use in society.
Consumers and producers pursue their own self-interest and interact in markets.
Market transactions generate an efficient—highest valued—use of resources.
See illustration on page 155 of the text.
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET EFFICIENT?
The invisible hand at work today
The invisible hand works in our economy today.
It coordinates the self-interest of producers and consumers of computers, oranges, and just
about every good or service that you can think of.
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET EFFICIENT?
Underproduction and overproduction
Obstacles to efficiency lead to underproduction or overproduction and create a deadweight
loss.
Deadweight loss
The decrease in consumer and producer surplus that results from an inefficient allocation of
resources
UNDERPRODUCTION Figure 5.6(a)
Price (dollars per pizza)
Deadweight S
25 loss
20
15
Efficient
10 output
If output is
reduced to 5
D
5,000
0 5 10 15 20
Quantity (thousands of pizzas per day)
OVERPRODUCTION Figure 5.6(b)
Price (dollars per pizza)
S
25
20
Deadweight
15 loss
10
5 If output
D is increased to
15,000 pizzas
0 5 10 15 20
Quantity (thousands of pizzas per day)
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET EFFICIENT?
Obstacles to efficiency that bring underproduction or overproduction are:
Price and quantity regulations
Taxes and subsidies
Externalities
Public goods
Monopoly
High transactions costs
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET EFFICIENT?
Alternatives to the market
When a market is inefficient can an alternative non-market method do a better job?
Majority rule might be used in a number of ways to improve the allocation of resources, but
it has its own shortcomings.
There is no one efficient mechanism for allocating resources efficiently.
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET FAIR?
Are markets fair?
Ideas about fairness can be divided into two groups:
1. It’s not fair if the result isn’t fair
2. It’s not fair if the rules aren’t fair
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET FAIR?
1. It’s not fair if the result isn’t fair
The idea that “it’s not fair if the result isn’t fair” began with utilitarianism, which is
the principle that states that we should strive to achieve “the greatest happiness for the
greatest number.”
UTILITARIAN FAIRNESS Figure 5.7
3 a Maximum
total
benefit
2 c
Steve
1 b
MB
0 5 25 45
Income (thousands of dollars)
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET
The Big Tradeoff
FAIR?
Recognising the cost of making income transfers leads to what is called “the big tradeoff,”
which is a tradeoff between efficiency and fairness .
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET FAIR?
Make the poorest as well off as possible
Harvard philosopher, John Rawls, proposed a modified version of utilitarianism in a
classic book entitled A Theory of Justice, published in 1971. Rawls says that, taking all
the costs of income transfers into account, the fair distribution of the economic pie is the
one that makes the poorest person as well off as possible.
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET FAIR?
2. It’s not fair if the rules aren’t fair
The idea that “it’s not fair if the rules aren’t fair” is based on the symmetry
principle, which is the requirement that people in similar situations be treated
similarly.
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET
Fairness and efficiency
FAIR?
If private property rights are enforced and if voluntary exchange takes place in competitive
markets, and if there are no:
Price and quantity regulations
Taxes and subsidies
Externalities
Public goods and common resources
Monopolies
High transactions costs
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET FAIR?
Case study: A water shortage in a natural disaster
Scenario: An earthquake has broken the pipes that deliver drinking water to a city.
Bottled water is available, but there is no tap water
What is the fair and efficient way to allocate the bottled water?
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET
Case study option 1: FAIR?
Market price
Water is allocated by market price, the price jumps to $8 a bottle. At this price, people who own
water can make a large profit
People who are willing and able to pay $8 a bottle get the water, and those who can’t afford the
$8 end up without or consume less water .
Water is, thus, used efficiently, with maximum consumer and producer surplus, and the outcome
is also fair.
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET
Case study option 2: FAIR?
Non-market methods
The government buys all the water, pay for it with a tax, and allocate to its citizens using one of
the following non-market methods
Command
Contest
First-come first-served
Lottery
Personal characteristics
None of these methods delivers an allocation of water that is either fair or efficient.
IS THE COMPETITIVE
MARKET FAIR?
Case study option 3:
Market price with taxes
The third approach is to allocate the scarce water using the market price but after
redistributing buying power by taxing the sellers of water and providing benefits to
the poor.
The tax is inefficient, but the outcome might be regarded as being fair.
END
CHAPTER 5