0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
29 просмотров26 страниц
Frederick W. Taylor was a mechanical engineer Fed up of workers inefficiencies Behavior of Employees Employee use varying techniques to do the same job worker out put was only one third of what was possible. He spent two decades pursuing one best way for 3shop-floor jobs' at Midvale and Bethlehem steel companies in Pennsylvania.
Frederick W. Taylor was a mechanical engineer Fed up of workers inefficiencies Behavior of Employees Employee use varying techniques to do the same job worker out put was only one third of what was possible. He spent two decades pursuing one best way for 3shop-floor jobs' at Midvale and Bethlehem steel companies in Pennsylvania.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PPT, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Frederick W. Taylor was a mechanical engineer Fed up of workers inefficiencies Behavior of Employees Employee use varying techniques to do the same job worker out put was only one third of what was possible. He spent two decades pursuing one best way for 3shop-floor jobs' at Midvale and Bethlehem steel companies in Pennsylvania.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PPT, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
B S T A R S V Scientific management was born on 1911
V Frederick W. Taylor¶s book Scientific
Management was published
V Contents were accepted throughout the
world by Managers The use of scientific methods to define the ³ ´ for a job to be done. O
V e worked at Midvale & Bethlehem steel
companies in Pennsylvania.
V e was a mechanical engineer
V Fed up of workers inefficiencies
6
V ëmployee use varying techniques to do the same job V ëmployees were inclined to ³Take it easy´ on the job V Worker out put was only one third of what was possible. V No work standard existed
V Fit between person¶s abilities and job was absent.
V Taylor set out to correct the situation
through SM
V e spent two decades pursuing one
best way for ³shop-floor jobs´ ë V At Midvale's he defined clear guide lines for improving production efficiency
V One of the best example of his work was
pig iron; workers load 12.5 tons while he argued they can load 47 to 48 tons. ë
V ºevelop a science for each element of an individual¶s work, which will replace the old rule-of-thumb method.
V Scientifically select and then train, teach, and develop the
worker.
V eartily cooperate with the workers so to ensure that all work is
done in accordance with the principal of science that has been developed.
V ºivide work and responsibility almost equally between
management and workers. Management takes overall work for which it is better fitted than the workers. ë V Taylor succeeded in getting desired level of productivity by placing the right person at right place on right time in all most all departments.
V is ideas spread out and are admired by
the Globe. a
V A construction contractor V Follower of Taylor V is wife Lillian joined him in the study of eliminating inefficient hand and body movements V Gilbreths also experimented with the design and proper use of tools and equipment for optimizing work performance.
V They are best known for their experiment on bricklaying V They reduced extra motions in exterior brick laying from 18 to 5. V And on interior brick laying it was 18 to 2 V They were the first who studied motion picture. V They also invented micro chronometer V They also classified therbligs 17 basic moments. M
V Based on the work on these two
scientists today's managers use scientific management to reduce extra motion and enhance efficiency.
V For ëxample : arrangement of Papers
O V Taylor, Fayol, Weber rules cant be applied universally V For ëxample: division of labor may result in extreme level of specialization V Bureaucracy is desirable but other structures also proved to good in other situation. Management is not based on simplistic principles to be applied in all situation ºefinition:
Contingency approach or situational approach
says that organizations are different, face different situations, and require different ways of managing. ë
V The contingency approach is described as ³if´ and ³then´ way of managing things. V It is intuitively logical because organization and even units within the same organization are diverse. V Universal management rules can be good but depending upon the encountered situations. M V System: a set of interrelated and interdependent parts arranged in a manner that produces a unified whole. V System may be open that interact with outside environment or it may be closed no interaction with environment. V Where ever there is an interaction organization need to be flexible. ë a6 !
V Organizational Size:
As size increases so do the problems, the
structure best suitable for an organization of 50,000 employees would be inappropriate for organization of 50 people.
V Routineness of Task Technology:
To achieve its purpose, an organization
uses technology. Routine technologies require organizational structures, leadership styles, and control systems that differ from those required by customized or non routine technologies
V ënvironmental Uncertainty: the degree of uncertainty caused by environmental changes influences the management process. What work best in stable and predictable environment may be totally inappropriate in a rapidly changing and unpredictable environment
V Individual differences: Individuals differ in terms of their desire for growth, autonomy, tolerance of ambiguity, and expectations. These and other individual differences are particularly important when managers select motivation techniques, leadership styles, and job designs.
V In addition to above said variables there are thousands of others that may impact management or managers in organization.
V The best way according to this approach is
to adjust the self according to the environment. ë uestions