Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
m
-> is the
actual process of history to the
historians on interpreting the contents
of the authenticity of the
document that was
approved during the external criticism.
m Both of these processes can help the
historian in conducting more
accurate research truth because
the authenticity of the source has
been determined at an early stage.
m External criticism of the process carried
out by using the methods
of historians such as:-
^ Chemical test.
^ Language test.
^ handwritten test.
m ë
^ In the early stages, the historian will try
to determine the actual age of
a document that will be used to look
at some elements of physical resources.
^ Historians need
to examine the documents such
as the paper, ink, stamp used.
^ Efforts to do chemical test is to avoid
falsification of documents or a source.
^ ocuments or resources produced in
the history of civilization has a very real
difference in terms of content of materials
used at that time.
^ For
example, materials for producing ceramics
in the era of civilization is not the same
between
Yangshao and Loashang civilization
although both these civilizations have existe
d in China and different era in terms
of appearance.
m ð
^ ëhis is an important to conduct language
test by historians because the nature
of language in the
world is dynamic and changes over time.
^ Historians will have a
problem when reading a document because
the writing style of the 1800's writing style is
not the same as in 1900's and these differences
occur is in terms of spelling,
handwriting, and double words.
^ therefore, the historian must have
the skills and understanding
of language as a rule. For example, the use
of dictionaries and
encyclopedias glossary to explain meaning
of the words the past.
m M
^ Handwriting tests conducted by the
historian is to examine the authenticity of
document and the source by comparing
the handwriting of the person with examples
of handwritten documents written by other
individuals.
^ ëhis comparative method to identify the
characteristics of the similarities and
differences in the
writing produced by the same person or
different persons.
m ëhe process of
internal criticism by historians began
after the completion of the
proper external criticism.
m Historians need to filter
out all the historical sources to ensure
that each item or items taken from
the source can be accounted for.
m Historians need to detect the
facts and statements contained in the
writing of history
and not only accepted directly from
witnesses gathered.
m Historian must make a rational
interpretation of the source of
the revelations given by
the perpetrators or witnesses of an
event.
m Internal criticism more
focused on the interpretation
of the content of historical sources.
m ëhere is some level of interpretation
of the source should be considered
by historians as :-
^ ºerbal Interpretation
^ ëechnical Interpretation
^ Logical Interpretation
^ Psychological Interpretation
^ Interpretation of the fact
m ºerbal Interpretation
^ ºerbal interpretation of the
process will occur when a reading focusing
on the words contained in a document for
individual and group.
^ ëhis interpretation is
more focused on aspects of language in
order to know the meaning of
words in a document.
^ In
addition, verbal interpretation also explains
the meanings of words and sentences to get
the idea that the author tried to
capture the relevant documents.
m ëechnical Interpretation
^ ëhis method of interpretation to explain the
purpose of writing done by a writer
resources and identify any specific reading o
f historical sources are used.
^ In general, the
technical definition of a document based
on two considerations, namely the purpose
of the writer and do a proper reading.
^ Both of these considerations will be able to
distinguish the source of the only sources
of information alone or mixed to the
historian.
m Logical interpretation
^ It is a method
of interpretation by historians to connect
the various parts of the resource according
to the right mindset.
^ Interpretation process is to provide a
networking event which
joined the historian of
thought, before or after the event occurred.
m Psychological interpretation
^ Method of interpretation is to see
the characters thoughts or author of
a resource that is influenced
by physical, social and intellectual.
^ Psychological interpretation of the history
of the source or document is read by a
process point of view to get ideas of history.
^ ëhrough this
method, researchers can detect the
influence of the physical work of the
author of the resources generated.
m Interpretation of the facts
^ ëhis method is used after
a successful historian to understand
the meaning and
content sources or documents are reviewed.
^ ëhe interpretation of the facts will be
made by applying one or more of three met
hods of interpretation of the past.
^ ëhrough the method of interpretation of the
facts in a document of history, historians can
present historical facts are significant, either
individually or in groups to explain the causes
and consequences of an event.