Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
governance
On speaking to villagers it was found that these villagers were cheated by local
agents land records changed, loss of land, bouncing of cheques, threats and living
in constant fear.
CASE STUDY
Introduction
Lavasa has been known to me for past 5 years or so, as a new
city / hill station coming up near Pune, a city which would
primarily be a luxury tourist & education center.
Pune like most Indian cities is being overwhelmed by migrations from other
parts of India. Lavasa could take some of the load.
Lavasa could bring in tourists from across the globe, would help the
economy of the area
Lavasa claims that some 97000 jobs will be generated and that for most
jobs, locals would be employed.
Lavasa has the luxury of a fresh start & can fix the things that have gone
wrong in most Indian cities
Most of rural India struggles to makes ends meet. It is likely that the local
people whose lands were bought by Lavasa & who are employed at Lavasa
would be financially better off than earlier.
Actions
Medha Patkar & her team led by Ms. Suniti have been
opposing Lavasa since 2008. However only in the last
couple of months has the protest really picked up steam,
with many well known activists like Anna Hazare
joining in and the Ministry of
A valid point made by one shahir was that – “Lavasa says they
will give us jobs but what they want in reality is for us to be
dogs at their door, their watchmen, drivers, sweepers… We are
not educated, we wont get any dignified jobs at Lavasa, we
prefer farming.”
Most farmers have no money management or other skills
& will end up blowing the sum they get after sale and end
up doing menial jobs in Lavasa or in Pune city.
Laws & Equity have to apply just the same to all. So while
you want justice for the landless labourers & small
farmers there also has to be justice for the big players who
have invested crores into Lavasa.
The LCL in reply to this filed in a writ petition in the Mumbai High court
Against the ministry of environment and forest.
Till the time the committee does not submit the report, the show cause notice
Is applicable on the project and the LCL and no further construction can be
Done before the ministry gives its final verdict over the project.
Cont.
The MoEF made a committee of 9 members which included the advisor of the
MoEF Mrs. Nalini Bhatt, and the chairman of the committee Mr. Naresh Dayal.
The committee visited the site from 5th-7th January, 2011 and inspected every
Construction, every site of the project, assessed the environmental state and
Accordingly submitted the report to the MoEF which included a list of damages
That the LCL has caused to the environment conditions .
However the chairman of the committee is being criticized for pointing out very
Minor issue and damages to the environment.
Despite of all these issues , the MoEF is still ready to consider the project on
Merits , provided the company works on some stringent terms and conditions set
By the ministry.
For the purpose of ensuring immediate and proper compliance with the