Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Presenting complaint:
Swelling of Right eye since 2000.
Patient was alright prior to 2000 when he started developing proptosis of the eye. He underwent R orbitotomy in 2001 and histopathology showed granulomatous inflammation. The swelling increased after the operation. He then underwent repeat orbitotomy in 2002 and it was once again diagnosed as granulomatous inflammation, most likely fungal. Patient was sent to radiology department who have referred him back. There is no history of tuberculosis or thyroid eye disease. Positive history of headaches.
local Exam
Investigations
BT 3:30 CT 4:35 ABF : 76mg/dL B/Urea : 36mg/dL S/Creatinine : 0.7mg/dL Calcium : 142 meq Potassium : 4.3 meq Hep B & C negative Urine exam - NAD
Hb : 12.0 mg/dL TLC :8600 cells/mm3 Lukocyte : 66% Lymphos : 30% Monocytes : 2% Eosinophils 0.2% Blood Group : A +ve
Microscopic features:
Histopathologic examination of the section shows a fibrocollagenous tissue with chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate and numerous granulomata. No malignancy seen.
Opinion / Comment:
Granulomatous inflammation
Impression:
Diagnosis Retrobulbar orbit recurrent mass
CT scan Oribt
An irregular shaped soft tissue density lesion , retrobulbar in Right orbital cavity, with proptosis of Right eyeball. Lesion restricted to the orbital cavity with no extension intracranial or into the para-nasal sinuses.
Impression:
Morphological features are suggestive of inflammatory process.
CT scan 14-02
Bone Scan
No scintigraphic evidence of any bone pathology.
Histological sections of the sections reveals ocular tissue comprising of fibrocollagenous and fibrofatty tissue with dense infmlammatory cell infilt5rate comprising of lymphocytes. In addition there are granumuloms composed of multinucleated Langhan s and foreign body type o fgiant cells Granulomas are also seen in the peripheral adipose tissue and extraocular muscle. No caseation seen No vasculitis seen The features are strongly suggestive of chronic ranulomatous inflammation. Comments:
Most likely fungal granulomas.
Management
Plan
Enucleation radiotherapy
Extraconal space:
Contains ophthalmic vein, lacrimal nerve (V1), CN IV and frontal nerve (V1).
Other Locations.
The lacrimal gland and lacrimal sac as well as the potential for multiple compartment involvement.
F: Frontal bone with associated suture and notch. <- Trochlea <- Optical Canal S: Superior orbital fissure I: Inferior orbital fissure L: Lacrimal bone E: Ethmoid bone.
Bony Orbit
Evaluation - Review
Detailed recording of onset, duration and progression of the orbital disease. History of allergies, sinus infections, epistaxis, nasal discharge, and tearing to be reviewed to rule out sinonasal orgin. Review of systemic diseases (ex. thyroid, granulomatous and autoimmune) as well. PE: visual acuity, visual fields, pupillary responses, ocular motility, globe surface, exophthalmos, and direction of displacement. Complete head and neck evaluation. Lab/Imaging.
Schwannoma
Arising from any nerve braches within the orbit most common V1. Account for 1-6% of all orbital masses. Slow growing, well circumscribed, ovid and homogenous. Antoni A (spindle shaped cells), Antoni B (foamy cells).
Lymphoma
After inflammation and hemangioma this is the third most common cause of proptosis. Usually insidious onset, typically presents with proptosis, ptosis, diplopia, motility disorders. Of all orbital sites, the lacrimal gland is the most common site involved. Commonly will mold itself along the globe margin rather than invade. Bilateral occurrence is common.
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Most common orbital tumor in children. 90% of cases occur before age 16. Rapidly progressive but painless exophthalmos, proptosis, and ptosis. Arises from primative mesenchymal elements into 4 different types: embryonal >> pleomorphic, alveolar (worst prognosis) >> differentiated (best prognosis).
Dermoid Cyst
Represent the most common congenital lesion of the orbit (1/3 of all childhood orbital tumors). Arise as a sequestration of ectoderm within the suture lines of the orbital bones. Commonly observed as a painless mass in the superiotemporal area at the lateral portion of the eyebrow. Classified into juxtasutural, sutural and soft tissue types.
Orbital Varix
May be either congenital or acquired (thrombosis is common). Not neoplastic, but simple focal dilation that may be enlarged with increased venous pressure. May be associated with intraorbital/ intracranial AVM or simply result from wall weakness.
Capillary Hemangioma
One third are diagnosed at birth and over 90% are visible by 6 months of age. Bony erosion is not observed, although expansion of the walls is possible. Telangiectatic vessels typical create strawberry appearance. Frequently produce globe displacement and enlarge with crying.
Diagnosis
FNA is a minimally invasive technique that may be used for diagnosing orbital lesions. Differentiation between benign and malignant lesions reaches an accuracy of 95%. Coupled with clinical and radiological finding, proper diagnosis is made in 80% of cases. Disadvantages include poor cellular yield, difficulty in interpreting the specimen, and the possible need for another biopsy procedure. Open biopsy of an orbital tumor is the common method of obtaining tissue from the orbital lesion. It also may be necessary if FNA is inadequate. With open biopsy a histological diagnosis is commonly made because enough of a specimen usually is obtained.
Surgical Considerations
Some conditions (ex. Pseudotumor, capillary hemangioma) do not mandate surgical intervention. Surgical approach is tailored to the location of the lesion with minimization of infraorbital venous pressure. Orbitotomy can be performed in anterior, lateral, medial, cornal and even intracranial dissections can be made to gain inferior, supertemporal, posterior, or central access. Close intraoperative monitoring of the pupil size and administered medications in addition to post-operative evaluation with regards to vision, bleeding, and pain is essential is the treatment of these lesions. Finally, a thorough explanation of the procedure and the risks, benefits, and alternatives should be clearly explained and documented. The patient should be cognizant of the exact procedure and it is imperative that the patient understands the possibility of orbital exenteration if indicated.