Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
References
Project Management: Harvey Maylor
son Education, 3rd Edition) (Pear
Project?
Organizational Work Operations
Routine, repetitive &
Projects
Unique, temporary &
ongoing throughout;
Necessary to sustain the
goal directed;
Create strategic
business;
Incremental
initiatives/Products;
New paradigms are put
improvements set.
in place.
Project? (contd.)
Any non-repetitive activity; A low-volume high variety activity; a temporary endeavour undertaken to create a unique
product or service;
Any activity with a defined start and finish; a unique set of coordinated activities, with definite
starting and finish points undertaken to meet specific objectives within defined schedule, cost and performance pararmeters. (BS 6079: 2000)
Project? (contd.)
Projects come in many shapes and sizes:
By number of tasks (complexity) By time required to complete (duration) By resources (thus money) needed Combination of these factors Project teams are born to die! New paradigms become the S.O.P Contributes to organizations learning & growth Can (re)shape the Organization
Other Characteristics:
Project? (contd.)
Projects come in many shapes and sizes:
Diversity of competencies Efforts of many people Changing nature of requirements Tracking Financial outlay Risk
Project Typology
New to World
Complexity
Product Design
Orgn. Restruct.
Improvement Projects
Duration
Project? (contd.)
Performance
Breakthrough Improvement
Project for Development & Growth Series of mini projects
S/State 2 Stabilization
Time
Continuous Improvement
Project? (contd.)
For business continuity, this activity is on-going and is referred to as the S-Curve of a Firms life e.g. Tatas Automotive Business
Passenger cars Trucks & Construction. Equipment. Engineering. & Locomotive
S S
TELCO
TATA MOTORS
SC
TI M
O PE
Project Scope: specific work to be done Project Time: Duration with milestones Project Cost: tracking the budget Human Resources: competent team Procurement: adequate material & equipment Communication: progress vis-a-vis changes Quality: establishing and delivering acceptable Risk: analyzing and planning adequate response
Communicn Management
Scope Management
PROJECT MNANAGER
Quality Management
Risk Management
goals of the project, headed by a Project Manager; who uses knowledge, skills, tools and methodologies to:
Identify the goals, objectives, requirements and limitations of the project - Specification Coordinate the needs (and expectations) of the project stakeholders viz. team, customer, society/ sponsor & supplier Buy-in Plan and deliver the identified objectives & goals - Execution Close the project when completed - Closure Capture (for dissemination) the knowledge accrued - Continuity
Fair amount of Capital outlay A commitment of Human Resources for (extended) period of time Irreversibility and attendant risk And prioritization/choice from a wide to do list
assessed before start. Funds have to found for Feasible Projects, which includes a Risk Analysis Finally Projects have to be implemented and, Closed!
Close/Develop it
Continuous Improvemen t
Time
F P I C F P I C Time
Man-hrs
Concurrent Model
Save
Time
Reject/ shelve
No Go
Terminate No
Market Study
Ideation
Initial Screen
Go
Investigate
Tech/Ecol. Study
Fin./Eco Study
OK? Yes
Project Funding Plan
There are no defined methods or theories to guide the task; it is often an outcome of a triggering process; They fall-out from either significant technological breakthroughs; or from a rearrangement of the path to an existing end (reengineering). (Periodic) Strategic Planning exercise, stimulating some out-of-box thinking and redefined operational objectives; Creating a quasi-crises situation: if it aint broken, break it! Creating a culture of innovation and learning from failures;
Benchmarking key processes of existing top-class/world-class industries; Examining sourcing, import/export and input/output practices; Environmental Scanning & wandering around Suggestions/analyses of research, financial & development agencies; Generating a host of project ideas which require initial screening before committing time and effort for further investigation: Compatibility with promoter/shareholder viewpoint; Consistency with laws of the land and legislative priorities; Reasonableness of cost, risks and adequacy of markets; Checking out barriers to entry
Market Potential/Size Market Share Technical viability Sensible alternatives Environmental impact Restoration/containment Benefits and costs Knock-on impacts Risk Return
Ecology Analysis
Economic Analysis
Financial Analysis
What is the likely aggregate demand for the product or service? What share of market will the product/service influence? The analysis takes place in the flow:
Collection of Demand Secondary data Forecast Situational analysis Characterization & specification of Of Market Objectives. Conduct of Marketing Market survey Plan
To ensure technical feasibility especially in respect of inputs, To arrive at the best solution balancing technology/location/scale, The examination is based on common sense and economic logic, technology & ecology being in the expert domain. Inputs: involves ascertaining and lining-up choices; Plant/Facility: requires assessment of internal factors & constraints; Project Execution: detailing the project roll-out for road-blocks,
Investm Interest & loan Plan Deprn. repayment Sales Plan Prodn. Plan W/Cap Plan W/Cap Interest Advance Prodn. Estimate of Cash flow Cost Oprn. Result Taxes
B/Sheet
Knowledge
Financing
Cost of (contd)
Project
Means of Finance
High cost, control and Share Capital Debenture Capital lower fin. risk Term Loans Deferred Credit Incentives Other sources Least cost Bridging loans
factoring:
Time value of Money Pay back and Profitability Risk analysis & mitigation
Inflation reduces the purchasing power However, money invested productively yields returns and increases the value People prefer current consumption to future spend.
spending) are at different points of time. For a fair analysis, they have to be brought to the same (current) point of time
PV = Present Value; FV = Future value; Ct = Cash flow at the end of the year t r = Interest rate g = growth rate in cash flows n = number of periods over which cash flows
FVn = PV(1+r)n
(1+r)n is the Future value interest factor The process of investing money as well as reinvesting the interest earned is called Compounding.
Depositing Rs.1000 in the bank today @ 10% interest will in 8 years grow to: 1000(1.10)8 = 1000(2.144) = 2144
Investors commonly ask when will my money double? A rule of thumb says divide 72 by the interest rate
E.g.
if the interest rate is 12%, the doubling period is 72/12 = 6 years Using the formula: 1000(1.12)6 = 1000(1.974) i.e. 1000 becomes 1974 in 6 years.
earned 3 years from now will posses less value today. We need to know the present value of future earnings. The process is simply the reverse/inverse of compounding and is called Discounting. Formula (single sum): FVn = PV(1+r)n thus, PV = FVn[1/(1+r)n] The factor 1/(1+r)n is called discounting factor.
flow streams are uneven i.e. not a single sum; they vary year to year The formula for Present Value for uneven (or even) cash flows is:
PVn = A1/(1+r) + A2/(1+r)2 + . An/(1+r)n
n
=
t=1
At/(1+r)t , where
Issue: what is the basis for urgency? Therefore, used only in crisis situations.
Issue: does not reflect the true worth, but is a rough and ready reckoner to make quick evaluation and benchmarking, for initial assessment and for small-value projects.
comprises:
Step1: the income that will be generated with the initial investment; Step2: the amount of time that the revenue will need to be generated to cancel out the investment. E.g. If Rs. 1 cr. is generated/yr on an initial investment of Rs. 10 cr., then the payback is 10 yrs.
Many companies set this as a hurdle for projects, without going in for detailed computations e.g.
Manufacturing equipment/hardware (Western): Manufacturing equipment/hardware (Japanese): Computer/IT facilities: McDonalds franchise:
The life-cycle cost (e.g. disposal or decommissioning) of an item beyond the payback period a fact which could alter the viability considerably; The time-value of money.
represents the sum of all the cash flows, discounted to the present value. If the sum is +ve, then the project is yielding a surplus on date. Thus viable/ feasible.
Applying NPV formula: NPV = 200000/(1.10)1 + 200000/ (1.10)2 + 300000/(1.10)3 + .. -1,000,000 = Rs.5273; i.e. a surplus
n
NPV = At/(1+r)t
Now
50
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
30 40
45 50
45 60 70
NPV = NPVyr1 + NPVyr2 + NPVyr3 = -50 + (-30 +40)/(1+0.12)1 + (-45 +50)/(1=0.12)2 + (-45 +60 +70)/(1+0.12)3 = 23.415 NPV positive so worth pursuing
discounting rate at which the net present value of the project is 0. It indicates the minimum returns that the project has to generate annually for its duration. E.g.:
Yr C/F 0 -100 1 30 2 30 3 40 4 45 The rate which returns 100 is : 100 = 30/(1+r) + 30/(1+r)2 + .. i.e. r is between 15 & 16%.
Thus accept project if the rate of return is more than the discounting rate.
Alternative2: plot the calculated NPV (2 to 4 iterations) on a graph (x-axis: discount rate, y-axis: NPV) and the determine the IRR. E.g.:
Yr C/F 0 -100
12.85
1 30
2 30
3 40
4 45
IRR = 15.6%
20
NPV
10
Discount Rate
- 6.90
Project Management: The Process (contd) Investment Criteria Decision Support tools
The significance of these decision support
tools are:
Payback: The most commonly used method for evaluating investments of a small size and with a short time horizon. For investments of a larger size, the average rate of return is sometimes used as the primary criterion, with payback as a supplementary criterion.
Project Management: The Process (contd) Investment Criteria Decision Support tools
DCF: Allows for a quantitative evaluation of alternate uses of funds vis--vis a safer option e.g. deposit in a bank; Is a measure of the opportunity cost of money; Offers a very clear-cut, standardized decision criterion, e.g. invest if NPV > 0. IRR: Represents the return earned on initial investment made in a project OR the rate of return on the unrecovered investment balance in the project. It is easy to understand and is easily benchmark-able against other financial, economic rates. (NPVs are not so readily comparable to outside world)
NPV
X Y
projects
The IRR rule does not
C/Fl. Yr 2
A B
-4000 +4000
evaluate projects from the Societal view point, primarily Public investments.
Social cost/benefits differ from monetary measures due to Societal considerations and market imperfections; UN has formulated an process to assess this under the UNIDO Guide, in which societal and market considerations have been integrated to assess desirability of a Project. (Please read handout on Bridge Project & River Valley Project as an example for the approach)
Technique 1 stand-alone risk of a project Technique 2 risk of a project in the context of the firm and/or the market. Risk source is event specific and needs to be assessed at feasibility for threats to financials as well as impediments for execution (entailing unforeseen fund flow) For management of risk, measurement is essential Risk is two sided:
Alpha Risk: accepting the wrong Beta Risk: rejecting the right
In real life, this is a geophysical phenomenon and can be linked to a region and a value assigned say 0.2
in case of NPV calculations, the financial impact in case of untoward occurrence in implementation, the time & cost impact (loss and recovery)
Probability of Occurrence
Medium
High
High Priority
High Priority
Medium Priority
High Priority
Medium Priority
Low Priority
Low
Medium Priority
Low Priority
Low Priority
No Action; Ignore
Contextual
Corporate Risk
Break Even
Decision Tree
Market Risk
Stand Alone
SSS Analyses
Break Even
Decision Tree
Market Risk
Competitive risk affected by unanticipated actions of competition or new competition Industry-specific risk Unforeseen technologies/ products, regulatory changes etc. Market risk Unexpected changes in macroeconomic factors International risk Extraordinary developments on the exchangerate and/or Political climate
Project Management: The Process (contd) Risk the SSS Analyses of Financials
#1 Sensitivity:
Financial statements are worked out with each line changed for optimistic/realistic/ pessimistic values one at a time, the other lines being held at realistic values.
Investigating the situation whatif a change in assumption/projection were to happen Indicates the strength of relationship between the outcome/result and a given parameter e.g. change in profit if material-costs go up to pessimistic levels.
/ Net Assets
6.233
Total Assets
11.497
RONA
12.9% 14.8%
Sales
12.793
Operating expenses
11.690 11.573
Other Costs
5.854
+
Financial Income
-294
+
Purchased materials
5.854 5.728
% Sales
12.793
Project Management: The Process (contd) Risk the SSS Analyses of Financials
#2 Scenario:
Variables are interrelated, thus painting different, plausible scenarios involving different (but consistent) sets of variables is helpful. Usually, the factor(s) chosen represent the largest source of uncertainty (e.g. market growth rate), around which the scenarios are built.
The Best/Worst Case Analysis: where scenarios involving best/normal/ worst sets of variables are worked out, e.g. BEST: high demand, high selling prices, low operating costs etc. WORST: low demand, low selling prices, high operating costs etc.
Project Management: The Process (contd) Risk the SSS Analyses of Financials
#3 Simulation:
Sensitivity analysis indicates what-if nature correlations between dependant and various input factors, denoting strength of relationships;
A decision maker would want more certainty i.e. the likelihood of such occurrences. Simulation techniques help in developing probability profiles of events by combining (randomly) values of variables which have a bearing on chosen criteria.
It is a powerful technique which permits use of great deal of information and a highly efficient medium of communication; It does not replace judgement, contrarily it requires more application of judgement; A useful technique in the absence of good experience
the variability associated with obtaining different results (e.g. NPV) The weighted NPV works out NPV Prob. to: 200 0.3
600 900 0.5 0.2
E(NPV) = pi NPVi
i=1
= 0.3x200 + 0.5x600 + 0.2x900 measure of the risk is= 540 the range i.e.
risk
Standard
We can now define a coefficient of variation in which we relate the to weighted net present value:
CV = /weighted value ; = 250/540 = 0.46 The higher the CV, the higher the risk ranking
to know how much should be sold/produced at a minimum to ensure the project does not lose money?
Viewpoint 1: Accounting i.e. a value that ensures return of principal without availing of any opportunity (via the time-value principle). Projects breaking even this way may have ve NPV Viewpoint 2: Financial - the focus is on value creation i.e. the level at which the project will yield at least 0 NPV.
Project Management: The Process (contd) Sls 9M Risk the Break Even
P & L Forecast for a new Plant
Head
Yr0
18,000
Yr1-10
20,000
Investment Sales Var.Cost 12,000 Fixed Cost Deprn. 2,000 Pre-tax Profit Taxes(@ 33.3%) P.a.T Net Cflow ( Figs. Rs 000) 2,000 Cflow (Oprn)
V.C. 6M F.C. 1M Depr 2M Accounting BEven: PbT 0M Sales = (Fixed Costs + Deprn.)/ Contribution Margin ratio = (1,000+2,000)/0.333 PbT=0.33Sls 3M = Rs. 9 M
Tax = 0.33 PbT PaT = .667 PbT
also assess:
Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR): Borrowers ability to service a debt is important!
DSCR = (P.a.T + Deprn & amorzn + Interests + Lease rentals)/{Repayment & Interest of term debt + Lease rentals} all values cumulated over the period under consideration.
Project Management: The Process (contd) Risk the Decision Tree Analysis
A tool developed and used for aiding sequential
decision making in face of risk involved at every stage e.g. oil-field development.
Identifying the problem and alternatives; Delineating the decision tree: diagrammatic representation of the nature of decisions situations; Specifying the probabilities, impacts and outcomes; Evaluating the decision alternatives. Study handout on the example of a decision tree analysis Spectrum with their electric moped.
(e.g. Aircraft Coys) Or outsourced to Pure Project Organizations (e.g. MMRDA). Pure Project Organizations have a core, lean management team and engage man-power from a Contractor Pool allowing for flexibility in both nature and quantum of Human Resources. Institutions borrow personnel from internal expert groups to form Project Teams (who in turn might outsource specifics) to execute Projects.
Ports PM 1 PM 2
PM 1
Objective
general description of the work to be performed- called deliverables work excluded Overall schedule of project
Construction of House Construction, painting, internal electrical wiring, provision of electrical points, plumbing as per the design of the Architect and the work specifications Electrical fittings and Sanitary fittings to be supplied by the owner (exemption) Completion date- 6th June 2004
The breaking of overall project into sub elements Could be further broken down Enables preparation of individual work schedules, their inter relation ships and precedence Enables estimation of Resource requirements Enables realistic Costing
project control process to compute variance with actual costs and schedules. Identifies the Functional divisions/ Managers, Contractors to be involved for apportioning responsibilities
The requirements to be met Could be compatibility with established standards or a new specified requirement Helps in realistic costing Avoids ambiguity and consequent cost and time over runs & legal issues
(Responsibility #1 Team Members Matrix) # 4 Standards #2 Phases (WBS) With start/end Listed for each ***** Criteria. A task ***** ***** Each #3 Task flow B phase has many tasks
rough overview and then conducting revisions of this through an iterative process i.e. going through the cycle several times to test the effect of the revisions made on the outcomes; The objective is to make major revisions early in the planning cycle and then make minor refinements in the plan.
complexity, in line with the nature of the project, however the significant area of commonality is:
A construction of comprehensive but understandable picture of the project activities; Communication with others.
ability of people to understand what is going on i.e. visibility , illustrating inter-relations between activities and time. The 3 most commonly used charts are:
The Gantt Chart Program Evaluation & Review Technique: PERT charts Critical Path Method: CPM charts.
Simple to construct and understand Can track progress of individual Activity easily Good for small projects; e.g Boil Water for Tea
Planned activity Actual activity
Activities: 1. Fill kettle. 02mins. 2. Put on the stove..01min 3. Light the stove. 01min. 4. Wait for boiling . 05mins. 5. Take off kettle . 01min. 6. Put off stove . 01min.
Suited for complex projects involving many PERT developed for US Navy to manage complex
Polaris Missile Program.
Symbol of Activity A
Succeeding/Preceding Activities
3 C 4 2
Example of two Activities with a Common immediate Predecessor Dummy Activity- An imaginary Activity which does not consume resources but included in the Network diagram to maintain network logic and understand inter dependency of Activities
2 4
Note: If we were to include set up tea cups as an activity and we would do it while waiting for water to boil; activity D would then become a dummy & activity set up tea cups would be a real activity.
A path is any route comprised of one or more arrows (activities) connected in sequence; The longest path from the origin node to the terminal node is called the Critical Path ; This gives the expected duration of the project.
D
En
E
4
There are TWO paths: #1 St 1 -2 3 En ( i.e. A-B-C-D) & #2 St 1 4 En (i.e. A-E-F) Path # 1 takes: 1 + + 2 + 1 = 4 H Path # 2 takes: 1 + 1 + = 3 H The Project requires 4 H and path #1 determines the duration: thus Critical
The logic is to determine the latest allowable time that the activity can be completed without delaying the completion of the project, i.e. the start can be late (or early); The time difference between early start and late start is called slack or float; The total slack time is the maximum delay that can occur for noncritical activities. Once this slack is used up, non-critical activities become critical and any further delays will extend the project completion.
Estimates are obtained from, experience, people & experts knowledgeable about the difficulties involved
Standard Deviation, = v1/2 The larger the difference between a & b, the larger the
variance and uncertainty with te; i.e the higher the likelihood of completing earlier or later than te.
Expected completion time te of ALL activities on the Critical Path; The Standard Deviation, , for Project Completion Time is the Square root of the sums of Variances of ALL activities along the Critical Path: = ( v1 + v2 + vn)1/2 The probability of completing the project in the given completion duration, ts ,is determined by the number of standard deviations separating them: z = (ts te)/ , the corresponding probability can be found from a standard z-table.
te/v
p th a
Z (ts = 11 days)
7/0.44 6/1.78
D B C E F
The probability of finish in less than 11 days = .7673 x.5 x.2981 = 0.1143 i.e. < 12% chance
p th a
= ( v1 + v2 + vn)1/2
p th a
z = (ts te)/
te
4 4 6 6
Path A-D (S-1-E): 4 + 6 = 10 days Path B-E (S-2-E): 4 + 7 = 11 days Path C-F (S-3-E): 5 + 7 = 12 days i.e. the project is not expected to be completed in less than 12 days. The longest Path is C-F (S-3-E) and is critical, defining the duration.
A
1
B C
7 6
D E F
2 3
project cost, when Project activities are more accurately forecast-able and a definite relationship between time and cost can be established for each activity. The CPM assumes that the estimated completion times can be influenced by applying resources to particular key activities that the time for any activity is variable, depending on the amount of resources applied. The PERT method has been criticized because it is based on assumptions that sometimes yield uncertain results!
paths CPM, however, use a deterministic approach in time estimates for each Activity: only one time estimate is used. Thus, in CPM there is no statistical treatment of uncertainty. CPM is more Activity oriented. Hence it is possible to measure percentage completion of an Activity CPM more suited for well defined projects, with relatively small uncertainties like construction or in the Process industries
Activity & Interrelations (preceding/succeeding) Earliest event time & latest event time (to be determined)
60
70
60
16
70
24
Forward Pass
30
8
10
E 6 F 7 G 5
Latest ! H 8
C 4 D 5
40
9
9
60
16
16
70
24 24
Earliest
50
10
11
Reverse Pass
30
8
10
E 6 F 7 G 5
Latest ! H 8
C 4 D 5
40
9
9
60
16
16
70
24 24
50
10
11
Path?
Provides us the key to prioritization Provides us the back bone for further analysis:
Of
Resource needs and costs Impact of adjusting Project Schedules For reporting on an agreed base If we can establish a Time-Cost relationship.
Resource requirements per unit of work is defined Technological or other minimum time to finish a job is known A standard or normal time and cost can be established
the standard times. But client requirements and/or deadline pressures may require a Project to be expedited.
Standard Time: the time usually/normally required to carry out an activity: Ts Crash Time: the minimum time required to carry out an activity. Reduction impossible: Tc Standard & Crash Costs: Costs for resources associated with these Times: Cs, Cc
Cc
Cost
Cs Tc Time Ts
Time required for an activity can be crashed (i.e. reduced) to its crash time to reduce its duration; Additional costs are incurred, proportional to the time reduction effected to cover the added resource deployment; To reduce the project duration, only activities on the critical path need to be crashed.
Cs 30 50 50 20 10 50
3 14
14
Cc 60 90 100 50 20 80
D
A 5/3
2 5
9/5 C 5 8/7
6/4 E 4 17
13
5 20
20
F 4/1
6 24
24
3/2
Activity A B C D E F
B 2 5
Ts 5 9 8 6 3 4
13 3 14
14
Tc 3 5 6 4 2 1
D 6/4 E 4 17 16
13
Cs 30 50 50 20 10 50
5/3
19 5 20 20 19 3/2
F 4/1
23 6 24 24 23
A-B-D-F: 23 W A-C-E-F: 20 W
Activity A B C D E F
B A 5/3 3/3 2 3
3
Ts 5 8 8 6 3 4
3 6
6
Tc 3 5 7 4 2 1
D
Cs 30 50 50 20 10 50
C 8/7 7 4 7 7/7
5/5
5 10
10
F 4/1 1/1
6 14
14
Establishment is relatively independent of the Activities e.g. Project Office, Communication, Security etc. the extent may vary with nature of Projects. This set-up exists for the entire duration of the Project and is minimally affected by activity variance. Thus, the cost for this is fixed/structural in nature and has to be incurred for the duration of the project and is directly proportional to time. Activity is inversely proportional to time.
contrary time-trends.
Establishment Time
Cost
Normal Duration
24 W 23 W
20W 14W
Project Control
The basic questions that need to
answered are:
Is the project as a whole (and its parts) on/ ahead /behind Schedule? Has the cost of the Project as a whole (and its parts) as per/ more than/ less than budget? What is the trend in performance?
approach is inadequate!
Budgeted cost of work Scheduled (BCWS): represents the total cost budgets for all work packets to be completed and work-in-progress scheduled to be finished on date; Budgeted cost of work Performed (BCWP): represents the total cost budgets for all work packets to be completed and work-in-progress executed on date; Actual cost of work Performed (ACWP): represents the total cost budgets for all work packets to be completed and work-in-progress executed on date;
monitored:
Cost Variance = BCWP ACWP Cost Performance Index: BCWP/ACWP Schedule Variance = BCWP BCWS (in cost terms) Schedule Performance Index: BCWP/BCWS Estimated Cost Performance Index: BCTW/(ACWP + ACC)
Where, BCTW = Budgeted cost of total work & ACC = Additional cost for completion)
BCWS: 15 BCWP: 14 ACWP: 16 BCTW: 25(40 w) ACC: 12 Cost Variance: BCWP ACWP (14 -16) = -2 Schedule Var.: BCWP BCWS (14 15)= -1 Est. Cost Index: {BCTW/(ACWP+
ACWP + ACC
ACWP
BCWS
16 15 14
Schedule Var.
BCWP
Time.Var. 24
40 Review Date
Weeks
review!) Earned Value: 5800 x Rs.200 = Rs.1.16 M, (contractor has probably under billed.) Project will be at least 1 week late and will complete the project within the budget, subject to bill verification.
BCWS = Rs.1.2 M; BCWP = Rs.1.16 M ACWP: Rs.1.18 M Cost Variance: Rs.1.16 Rs.1.18 = - Rs. 0.02 M Schedule Var.: Rs.1.16 Rs.1.20 = - Rs. 0.04 M Time Variance: 1 week late (5800 should have been installed by the 29th review!) Earned Value: 5800 x Rs.200 = Rs.1.16 M, contractor will be paid this amount. The Rs.0.02 M excess has to be examined. Project will be at least 1 week late and the project will overshoot the budget if the billing is found correct. Then the installation rate works out to (Rs.1.18M/5800) Rs. 204/- per installation ACC: (10000-5800) x Rs.204 = Rs.0.87 M; Projected Cost: Rs.(1.18+ 0.87) = Rs.2.05 M against BCTW: Rs. (10000 x Rs.200) = Rs.2.00 M
Not every resource required will be freely available influencing design of project activities Particularly true when multiple activity/ projects requires the same resource e.g. Specialist skills Further, crashing will need to take this constraint into consideration
Changes through the duration of the execution since nature and type of activities vary with time Results in variable requirement/loading of a resource over time The usual resource loading pattern is: A slow but steady build-up Intense peaking at a certain point in time A gradual decline
Most Projects require few resources at early and late stages and many in the middle. This problematic for mangers who would like to deal with uniform pool of workers, equipment etc.
Aimed at sequencing the project activities to level the requirement of the constrained resource, e.g. shift working on bottle-neck machine. The results in resource requirements for the overall project is maintained at a fairly constant level Fair amount of leveling can done by juggling the activities around:
Taking advantage of Slack Delaying non-critical activities.
B 1 2 2
4 4 2 5 3 1
C 1 3 4
6 3 1
D 1 1 1
7 3 1
E 1 3 2
8 3 1
C 4
E 2
6
1 2 1
Durn. 2 2 2 1 3 6 3
D 5 1
B 1 2 2
4 4 2 5 5 2
C 1 3 4
6 5 2
D 1 1 1
7 3 1
E 1 3 2
8 3 1
A 2
C 4 D 1
6
1
Durn. 2 2 2 1 3 3 1
Day
1 mechanic can join from day 3, 1 more from day 4, 1 more from day 5 and 2 mechanics can leave from day 7; so no mechanic works more than 5 days
Improvement Projects
Many Projects which are done in companies are
In Operations: reduction of rejections In Design: reducing documentation & testing time In Finance: reducing accounts receivable & bad debts
require the same approach based on utilizing incompany knowledge and experience Thus there is a standard process for these Projects, developed from the TQM philosophy.
and Authority are prime concerns. But there is more, especially during a set-up/change process; People have to "do" something to make the processes happen. Therefore it is useful to describe what should be done by whom The RASCI model is a relatively straightforward tool that can be used for identifying roles and responsibilities
R = Responsible - owns the problem / project A = to whom "R" is Accountable - who must sign off (Approve) on work before it is effective S = can be Supportive - can provide resources or can play a supporting role in implementation C = to be Consulted - has information and/or capability necessary to complete the work I = to be Informed - must be notified of results, but need not be consulted
Contractor
Police
Public
A C A A
C I R I
R A I R
I R I, S I
Some decisions clearly have a greater impact on the business than others, but the underlying skill is the same; The difference is in the scope and depth of the process you go through to reach your decision In day-to-day operations, these are mostly in the domain of: Choice making Problem-solving/Improvements In these areas, the people need to be supported with simple tools/aids, viz.
People feel pressured and anxious; The time pressure means taking shortcuts, jumping to conclusions, or relying heavily on instinct to guide your way. The other extreme is the guy who simply can't make a decision because he analyses the situation to death!
decision-making that doesn't require endless investigation, but helps weigh up the options and impacts is needed.
Decision-making is a skill set that needs be learned and improved; One such approach is called the Kepner-Tregoe Matrix. It provides an efficient, systematic framework for gathering, organizing and evaluating decision making information.
ALTERNATIVES
WANTS
MUSTS
Problem Solving
The problem with problems is not that they occurin spite of our best
efforts, stuff happens. Unforeseen circumstances will always conspire against us to disrupt the smooth operation of our production and operations systems and upset our plans. The problem with problems is that we fail to prevent them from happening again. Problems do not confine themselves to organizational niches or structures: they encompass many parts, even the whole organization. Solutions, therefore, more often than not require a team effort to find a lasting cure:
Engaging different skills, knowledge & aptitude Requiring divergent resources These reside scattered in different parts of the organization
methodology:
Involvement: cross-functional and cross-hierarchical, Knowledge & Information sharing, Camaraderie and bonding, Multi-dimensional, thus a holistic solution, Step-by-step (P-D-S-A) approach: subsequent steps based on soundly established previous steps, few come-backs, Problems tackled in bite-size pieces Provisions for emergency response, escape and recurrence preventing measures
The 8-D method of problem solving is appropriate in "cause unknown" situations and
is not the right tool if concerns center solely on decision-making or problem prevention
8 D Process
D 0 - The Planning Stage:. 8-D is especially useful as it results in
not just a problem-solving process, but also a standard and a reporting format.
Does this problem warrant/require an 8D? If so comment why and proceed. Is an Emergency Response Action needed?
with the process/ product knowledge, allocated time, authority and skill in the required technical disciplines to solve the problem and implement corrective actions.
Team to set Objectives & Goals: brings belief, commitment & realism
8 D Process
D 2 - Problem Definition: Provides the starting point for solving
Need to have correct problem description (photos, verbatim statements, eye-witness accounts) to identify causes.
5Ws + H approach in is and is not answers e.g. Who is or is not affected by the problem
Temporary actions to contain the problem and fix until permanent correction is in place - document actions in an Action Item Table. D 4 - Identifying & Verifying Root Cause: Analyze for Root Cause of the problem.
Brainstorming, 5 Whys, Ishikawa Diagrams, DOE etc. document actions in an AIT. Identify and verify the Escape Point
8 D Process
D 5 - Identify Permanent Corrective Actions:
Solutions determined to be the best of all the alternatives. Document and verify the Permanent Corrective Action (PCA) in the AIT.
Implement and validate to ensure that corrective action does what it is supposed to do.
Detect any undesirable side effects. Document this on the AIT. Return to root cause analysis, if necessary
Ensure that corrective action remains in place and successful Address similar systems Revise related documentation (Design/Process/Q-Systems)
8 D Process
Use all forms of employee recognition and document as necessary. Celebrate successful conclusion of the problem solving effort. Formally disengage the team and return to normal duties OR Go for the next round of problem solving for the remaining issues
D7&8
D6