Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Branchless Banking for the Poor: Agents, Mobile Phones, Cash Cards and New Thinking
Branchless Banking for the Poor: Agents, Mobile Phones, Cash Cards and New Thinking
Budapest, June 8, 2006
banking
Branchless banking in the region ATMs and cash cards already a reality What prospects for other branchless banking?
bank premises (branches) Exponential expansion of access possible through information and communications technologies (ICTs) Challenges for policy makers and regulators:
How to adapt or apply existing regulatory norms to new branchless business models? Any new risks to consider?
delivery (i.e., microfinance) are inherently high (because costs dont vary proportionally with transaction size) Costs of traditional bank branch networks too high for remote, sparsely populated areas ICTs have potential to cut transaction costs dramatically
devices Banks working through retail agents outfitted with POS devices or other ICTs Mobile phone telcos working through retail agents Prepaid card issuers working through retail agents outfitted with POS devices or other ICTs
settlement of transactions ICTs allow for detailed transaction records (at tiny per-transaction cost) Improving data security (and comfort from wide-spread use in developed financial systems)
10
ICTs (especially mobile phones) Low cost of tapping into existing retail distribution channels, such as
Post offices Lottery kiosks Cell phone airtime retailers Supermarkets Potentially any retail outlet with cash on hand
11
well-suited to branchless banking models Policy makers and regulators need to understand new transactions and relationships (and adjust regulatory thinking) Importance of retail agents as cash in, cash out point:
What needs to be externally regulated and how?
12
Brazil
India
Access to microloans expanding rapidly where a commercial bank teams up with traditional MFIs as its retail agents
Philippines
Collection costs for microfinance loans are 77% lower if paid via cell phone
13
<label>
Facilitate access to financial services for poorer/unbanked citizens Reach previously untapped markets and customers Receive payments (for loans or bills) without costly collection procedures, and with lower default rates Gain new customers and reduce customer turnover; earn fees for services provided Earn fees on transactions processed
Gain access to financial services that are more secure and less costly than informal financial services 14
bank-plus-retail agent model Brazil India non-bank-plus-retail agent model The Philippines Kenya (pilot)
15
16
Loan/bill/tax payment; loan disbursal Deposits & withdrawals Opening accounts; issuing credit cards
17
...
Operational risks Risks such as system reliability, data security, risk of misuse and fraud
Reputation risks Risks such as association with poor performance of retail agents or agent fraud
Legal risks
Brazil
Banks may contract agents to conduct banking correspondent activities (defined as doing banking business on behalf of a bank; risks must be assumed by contracting institution) Agents must be authorized by Central Bank Banks are held fully responsible for actions of its agents Central Bank has full and unrestricted access to data from retail agents Customers can recover from either retail agent or bank in case of fraud, negligence, etc. Banks must establish internal controls to provide for systematic monitoring of activities performed by agents
19
India
Banks held fully responsible for actions of their retail agents; banks assume all operational, legal, and reputational risks Banks strongly encouraged to perform full due diligence on potential agents and to monitor their performance Banks held responsible for ensuring that agents meet AML/CFT requirements (more flexibility for poor customers) Bank remains responsible to customer in case of fraud, negligence, etc. by retail agent (but Grievance Redressal Officer and Banking Ombudsman also available) Agreements with customers must clearly state that bank remains responsible to customers for agents actions
20
21
Item purchase
22
works with prepaid card issuers and networks of card-reading devices at the retail agents Differences:
Technological method of communication among
parties (card scanners versus text messaging) Without a telco, customer must visit a retail agent for each transaction
23
Liquidity risk Bank (and supervisor) cannot directly observe movements of customer accounts (i.e. account management outsourced)
Credit risk Risk of customer not being able to convert emoney into cash
The Philippines
Most experience with telco-based model to serve previously unbanked clients Retail agents are stores, cell phone outlets, etc. Central Bank circulars require telco to obtain Central Banks approval (as payment processor) before launching new service Approval based on detailed description and projections Central Bank can require changes in services if deemed too risky Money laundering regulations apply to cell phone company (as payment processor)
25
Kenya
Piloting with telco (Vodafone affiliate) under watchful eye of the Kenyan Central Bank (safe) Prepaid card issuer (SmartMoney): no regulation (so significant risks)
26
cards, debit cards and credit cards) But what is needed to roll out either the bankplus-retail agent or the non-bank-plus retail agent model? EU members are governed by EU E-Money Directive (so non-bank model is limited)
27
28
Thank you!
29