V.N.M.Nair, Professor, SBMJCE, Bangalore V.N.M.Nair, Professor, SBMJCE, Bangalore
22/11/2006 22/11/2006 Bob Knowlton Bob Knowlton CASE FACTS CASE FACTS MAJOR CHARACTERS MAJOR CHARACTERS BOB KNOWLTON BOB KNOWLTON- - HEAD OF PHOTON LAB. HEAD OF PHOTON LAB. SIMON FESTER SIMON FESTER - - NEW RESEARCHER ASSIGNED TO PHOTON NEW RESEARCHER ASSIGNED TO PHOTON LAB. TO ASSIST KNOWLTON LAB. TO ASSIST KNOWLTON Dr. JERROLD Dr. JERROLD- - PROJECT HEAD PROJECT HEAD LINK LINK- - MATHEMATICIAN MATHEMATICIAN OLIVER OLIVER - - RESEARCHER RESEARCHER DAVENPORT DAVENPORT- - RESEARCHER RESEARCHER THURLOW THURLOW- - RESEARCHER RESEARCHER LUCY&MARTHA LUCY&MARTHA- - SECRETARIES SECRETARIES BOB KNOWLTON BOB KNOWLTON BACKGROUND BACKGROUND THE CASE PRESENTS A TYPCAL AMERCAN RESEARCH THE CASE PRESENTS A TYPCAL AMERCAN RESEARCH LABORATORY WHERE SPONSORED RESEARCH S GONG ON LABORATORY WHERE SPONSORED RESEARCH S GONG ON N CUTTNG EDGE TECHNOLOGES. TYPCAL AMERCAN N CUTTNG EDGE TECHNOLOGES. TYPCAL AMERCAN VALUES PREVAL. NDVDUAL ACCOMPLSHMENT S GVEN VALUES PREVAL. NDVDUAL ACCOMPLSHMENT S GVEN MORE WEGHTAGE. EVERYBODY N PHOTON LAB UNDER MORE WEGHTAGE. EVERYBODY N PHOTON LAB UNDER BOB KNOWLTON S HAPPY. KNOWLTON HAS A GOOD BOB KNOWLTON S HAPPY. KNOWLTON HAS A GOOD PROFESSONAL AND PERSONAL FRENDSHP WTH Dr. PROFESSONAL AND PERSONAL FRENDSHP WTH Dr. GERROLD WHO S THE PROJECT HEAD. GERROLD WHO S THE PROJECT HEAD. BOB KNOWLTON BOB KNOWLTON THE WHOLE SCENARO CHANGES WTH THE ARRVAL OF SMON FESTER THE WHOLE SCENARO CHANGES WTH THE ARRVAL OF SMON FESTER NTO THE PHOTON LAB. THOUGH KNOWLTON WELCOMES HM , AN NTO THE PHOTON LAB. THOUGH KNOWLTON WELCOMES HM , AN UNKNOWN FEAR CREEPS NTO HS MND. UNKNOWN FEAR CREEPS NTO HS MND. FESTER MPRESSES EVERYBODY WTH HS SUPEROR NTELLGENCE AND FESTER MPRESSES EVERYBODY WTH HS SUPEROR NTELLGENCE AND PRACTCAL WSDOM. LNK TOO S VERY MUCH MPRESSED WTH FESTER PRACTCAL WSDOM. LNK TOO S VERY MUCH MPRESSED WTH FESTER AND STARTED MOVNG CLOSELY WTH FESTER. FESTER COMES OUT WTH AND STARTED MOVNG CLOSELY WTH FESTER. FESTER COMES OUT WTH NNOVATVE SOLUTONS FOR THE PROBLEMS THEY ARE WORKNG AT. Dr. NNOVATVE SOLUTONS FOR THE PROBLEMS THEY ARE WORKNG AT. Dr. JERROLD PRASES FESTER N KNOWLTON'S PRESENCE. KNOWLTON JERROLD PRASES FESTER N KNOWLTON'S PRESENCE. KNOWLTON BECOMES NSECURE AND FEELS THAT HE S VERY SMALL BEFORE FESTER. BECOMES NSECURE AND FEELS THAT HE S VERY SMALL BEFORE FESTER. KNOWLTON LOOSES NTEREST N WORK AND FNALLY DECDES TO LEAVE KNOWLTON LOOSES NTEREST N WORK AND FNALLY DECDES TO LEAVE SMMONS LABORATORES SMMONS LABORATORES BOB KNOWLTON BOB KNOWLTON MAJOR SSUES N THE CASE MAJOR SSUES N THE CASE WRONG PERCEPTON WRONG PERCEPTON COMMUNCATON BREAK DOWN COMMUNCATON BREAK DOWN WRONG ASSUMPTONS WRONG ASSUMPTONS PERSONALTY RELATED PROBLEMS PERSONALTY RELATED PROBLEMS EGO CLASH EGO CLASH JEALOUSY JEALOUSY FEAR FEAR LACK OF SELF CONFDENCE LACK OF SELF CONFDENCE NTOLERANCE NTOLERANCE BOB KNOWLTON BOB KNOWLTON OUTCOMES OUTCOMES GROUP COHESON STARTED DSAPPEARNG GROUP COHESON STARTED DSAPPEARNG LOSS OF WORK MOTVATON LOSS OF WORK MOTVATON GROWNG SENSE OF NSECURTY AMONG PEOPLE GROWNG SENSE OF NSECURTY AMONG PEOPLE FNANCAL LOSS FNANCAL LOSS SUSPCON SUSPCON KNOWLTON'S RESGNATON KNOWLTON'S RESGNATON Dr. GERROLD'S UNHAPPNESS Dr. GERROLD'S UNHAPPNESS LOSS OF CREDBLTY LOSS OF CREDBLTY BOB KNOWLTON BOB KNOWLTON MAJOR PROBLEMS DAGNOSS MAJOR PROBLEMS DAGNOSS PERCEPTON RELATED SSUES PERCEPTON RELATED SSUES PERSONALTY RELATED SSUES PERSONALTY RELATED SSUES COMMUNCATON RELATED SSUES COMMUNCATON RELATED SSUES BEHAVOURAL RELATED SSUES BEHAVOURAL RELATED SSUES BOB KNOWLTON BOB KNOWLTON QUESTONS POSED? QUESTONS POSED? HOW THE PRESENT CRSS COULD HAVE BEEN HOW THE PRESENT CRSS COULD HAVE BEEN AVERTED? AVERTED? WHAT S DR. JERROLD'S CONTRBUTON N THS WHAT S DR. JERROLD'S CONTRBUTON N THS CRSS? CRSS? WHAT S FESTER'S CONTRBUTON N THS? WHAT S FESTER'S CONTRBUTON N THS? WHAT WENT WRONG WTH KNOWLTON? WHAT WENT WRONG WTH KNOWLTON? WHAT S LNK'S CONTRBUTON N THS FASCO? WHAT S LNK'S CONTRBUTON N THS FASCO? WHO WON AND WHO LOST? WHO WON AND WHO LOST? WAS THER ANY SOLD REASON FOR THS CRSS? WAS THER ANY SOLD REASON FOR THS CRSS? BOB KNOWLTON BOB KNOWLTON POSSBLE PREVENTVE MEASURES POSSBLE PREVENTVE MEASURES 1. 1. Dr. JERROLD SHOULD HAVE DSCUSSED WTH KNOWLTON Dr. JERROLD SHOULD HAVE DSCUSSED WTH KNOWLTON BEFORE SENDNG FESTER TO THE PHOTON LAB. PHOTON BEFORE SENDNG FESTER TO THE PHOTON LAB. PHOTON LAB HEAD'S CONCURRENCE WOULD HAVE BEEN LAB HEAD'S CONCURRENCE WOULD HAVE BEEN OBTANED OBTANED 2. 2. OFFCAL THNGS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MXED WTH OFFCAL THNGS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MXED WTH PERSONAL RELATONSHPS PERSONAL RELATONSHPS 3. 3. Dr. JERROLD SHOULDN'T HAVE TAKEN KNOWLTON FOR Dr. JERROLD SHOULDN'T HAVE TAKEN KNOWLTON FOR GRANTED GRANTED BOB KNOWLTON BOB KNOWLTON 4. 4. FESTER SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE DPLOMATC FESTER SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE DPLOMATC 5. Dr. JERROLD SHOULD NOT HAVE DSCUSSED THNGS ALONE WTH 5. Dr. JERROLD SHOULD NOT HAVE DSCUSSED THNGS ALONE WTH FESTER WTHOUT FESTER'S BOSS KNOWLTON. FESTER WTHOUT FESTER'S BOSS KNOWLTON. 6. Dr. JERROLD SHOULD HAVE TOLD KNOWLTON THAT FESTER WAS TO 6. Dr. JERROLD SHOULD HAVE TOLD KNOWLTON THAT FESTER WAS TO JON SOME OTHER GROUP LATER JON SOME OTHER GROUP LATER 7. Dr. JERROLD SHOULD HAVE CONTUED HS USUAL DALOGUE WTH 7. Dr. JERROLD SHOULD HAVE CONTUED HS USUAL DALOGUE WTH KNOWLTON SO THAT KNOWLTON SHOULDN'T HAVE GOT TME FOR WLD KNOWLTON SO THAT KNOWLTON SHOULDN'T HAVE GOT TME FOR WLD MAGNATON. MAGNATON. 8. FULL BREAK DOWN OF COMMUNCATON SHOULD HAVE BEEN AVODED 8. FULL BREAK DOWN OF COMMUNCATON SHOULD HAVE BEEN AVODED BY ALL. BY ALL.