Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
y Tide Water Oil Co. (I) Ltd is a part of the multi divisional Andrew Yule
group that has diverse interests in Engineering, Electrical, Tea Cultivation, Power Generation, Digital Communication Systems and Lubricants.
y The company manufactures & sells engine lubricants for the automotive
and Faridabad.
y The company`s products marketed under the `VEEDOL` brand name are
well established and acknowledged in the industry for their quality and variety.
y The products manufactured under the technical collaboration agreement
with Nippon Oil Corporation (formerly Mitsubishi Oil Co Ltd) and marketed under the `ENEOS` brand name have carved out a niche for themselves in select markets.
Income
Sales Turnover Net Sales Other Income Total Income
Mar '07 Mar '08 Mar '09 Mar '10 Mar '11
100 100 100 100 120.03 119.19 182.01 117.96 145.15 147.19 2.09 147.06 178.70 181.23 146.86 182.64 204.82 209.16 197.49 214.11
Expenditure
Raw Materials Power & Fuel Cost Employee Cost Other Manufacturing Expenses Selling and Admin Expenses Miscellaneous Expenses Total Expenses 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 104.94 108.11 151.50 396.85 139.60 26.98 112.53 126.03 127.93 142.97 393.12 223.57 37.40 141.02 130.01 148.65 167.12 570.49 343.73 44.74 164.81 165.90 145.95 211.87 784.24 333.91 62.05 195.45
years. Over the same period, the Raw Material costs & Power & Fuel Costs have increased by about 50%. The Other Manufacturing Expenses of the company have shot up greatly to 7.8 times of what it was in the year 2007. The Selling & Admin expenses have roughly trebled during the same period. This implies that the company is facing market competition and hence the marketing expenditure has increased. Overall the company s Total Expense have just doubled implying that the company is able to pass on the cost to its customers and maintain its margins which is a very healthy sign.
Mar '07
Mar '08
Mar '09
Mar '10
Mar '11
Total Income
365.69 100.00% 431.35 100.00% 537.79 100.00% 667.89 100.00% 782.97 100.00%
347.5 95.03% 391.03 90.65% 490.04 91.12% 572.72 85.75% 679.19 86.75%
15.8
4.32%
35.97
8.34%
47.7
8.87%
8.97
2.45%
23.18
5.37%
27.55
5.12%
57.79
8.65%
64.16
8.19%
14.07%
13.18%
9.02% 8.40% 4.40% 5.41% 2.50% Mar '07 Mar '08 Mar '09 Mar '10 Mar '11 5.21% 8.87% 8.53%
Operating Margins
Operating Margins & Profit Margins have steadily increased over the past 5 years. The Company is able to keep its costs under control and improve its margins.
Raw Materials Power & Fuel Cost Employee Cost Other Manufacturing Expenses Selling and Admin Expenses Miscellaneous Expenses Preoperative Exp Capitalised Total Expenses
71.51% 335.81 68.53% 346.41 60.49% 442.04 65.08% 0.31% 1.42 0.29% 4.28% 1.65 24.5 0.29% 4.28% 1.62 31.06 0.24% 4.57%
4.22% 22.21
5.68% 20.96
3.49
1.00% 13.85
3.54%
13.72
2.80% 19.91
3.48%
27.37
4.03%
10.75
3.09%
2.9
0.74%
4.02
0.82%
4.81
0.84%
6.67
0.98%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
costs. y Over the years, the raw materials cost as part of its total expenses has decreases thus easing the pressure on performance margins. y However, the selling & admin expenses outlay has increased from 14% to 25% in these 5 years inferring that the company is focusing on its brand and facing competition in the sector.
Sources Of Funds Reserves Networth Secured Loans Total Debt Total Liabilities Application Of Funds Gross Block Less: Accum. Depreciation Net Block Capital Work in Progress Investments Inventories Sundry Debtors Cash and Bank Balance Total Current Assets Loans and Advances Fixed Deposits Total CA, Loans & Advances Current Liabilities Provisions Total CL & Provisions Net Current Assets
Mar '07 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Mar '08 120.65 119.91 72.12 41.75 110.63 117.17 107.98 129.53 182.98 100.00 140.35 96.08 114.14 123.66 117.47 55.73 118.09 143.90 114.69 131.63 106.14
Mar '09 144.58 143.00 36.24 20.98 128.50 140.13 119.63 167.68 906.38 100.00 110.17 111.83 233.88 120.58 176.36 105.94 138.23 166.77 166.20 166.53 113.26
Mar '10 196.08 192.74 0.00 0.00 169.83 239.68 131.06 385.69 57.45 100.00 192.67 142.96 78.51 167.18 43.10 136.77 124.65 191.38 25.23 121.62 127.32
Mar '11 252.83 247.58 0.00 0.00 218.16 248.57 166.49 358.90 111.70 100.00 249.30 198.91 150.44 224.81 102.60 22.81 173.99 228.74 51.89 154.48 191.21
have doubled in the past 5 years. The company became debt free from the year 2010. The company s investments have remained constant. The provisioning by the company is showing a declining trend lately concluding that the company is managing its earnings. Based on the above observations, we can infer that the company is highly conservative with no aggressive plans of expansion.
2.13
2.00
1.87 1.70
2.06
2.39
1.50
1.00
1.15
0.50
0.00
Mar '07
Mar '08
Mar '09
Mar '10
Mar '11
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Current Ratio decreased due to recession & then increased ---- The company is fairly in a good position meeting its short term liabilities. The gap between the 2 lines decreased and then increased implying poor inventory management or increase in inventory.
Debtor Turnover
20.00
13.93
15.00
11.15
10.00
5.00
0.00
Mar '07
Mar '08
Mar '09
Mar '10
Mar '11
Debtor Turnover The debtor turnover ratio has more or less remained flat over the given period.
Mar '07
Inventories Sundry Debtors Cash and Bank Balance Total Current Assets 67.54 59.05%
Mar '08
94.79 67.02%
Mar '09
74.41 53.96%
Mar '10
130.13 68.06%
Mar '11
168.38 65.49%
37.71
32.97%
36.23
25.62%
42.17
30.58%
53.91
28.20%
75.01
29.17%
9.12
7.97%
10.41
7.36%
21.33
15.47%
7.16
3.74%
13.72
5.34%
114.37 100.00%
141.43 100.00%
137.91 100.00%
191.2 100.00%
257.11 100.00%
The sundry Debtors have decreased w.r.t total current assets and hence signifying a better debtors management.
ROCE
50.00% 45.00% 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00%
13.18%
Mar '07
Mar '08
Mar '09
ROCE
Mar '10
Mar '11
The ROCE of the company has increased consistently over the period. There has been a drop in FY 11 due to increase in raw material costs.
RONW (ROE)
35.00%
30.00%
28.67% 24.71%
25.00%
18.64%
20.00%
18.51%
15.00%
8.69%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Mar '07
Mar '08
Mar '09
RONW (ROE)
Mar '10
Mar '11
The ROE of the company has increased consistently over the period. Hence creating value for its shareholders. There has been a drop in FY 11 due to increase in raw material costs.
700
18
16.62
600
16 14
500
12 10 8 6
400
300
200
4 2 0
100
0 Mar '07 Mar '08 Mar '09 Mar '10 Mar '11
The dividend payout ratio is low but the equity dividend % (Dividend on its Face Value) has been consistently increasing thus creating value for shareholders. This is possible because the company is generating higher profits and hence with more or less the same dividend payout ratio , the company is creating value.
3000
2,980.26
2500
2,313.59
2000
1,708.56
1500
1,184.81
1000
500
The EPS of the company has been steadily increasing which has almost multiplied to 7 times in these 5 years, thus creating value for the shareholders. The BVPS has also steadily increased in the past 5 years.
Based on the P/E, Tide Water Oil is highly undervalued based on the industry average & also its leading peer Castrol Its Price to Book also shows that Tide is highly undervalued.
material prices fluctuations. The company majorly depends on the automobile sector for its customers and hence dependent on it. Compared to industry average and its closest peer Castrol, it is grossly undervalued and available at good price for long term investment The company is debt free The Performance of the company in terms of margins have shown a consistent increase in the past 5 years. The company is consistently creating value for its share holders in terms of dividends and consistent growth in EPS. Hence , it s a fundamentally strong company with a good track record of performance. Also, due to low equity base, and high reserves, the market is expecting a bonus from the company.