Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
What is a contract? A contract is a meeting of the minds between two persons whereby one binds himself, with respect to the other, to give something or to render some service. A contract is a juridical convention manifested in legal form, by virtue of which, one or more persons bind themselves in favor of another or others, or reciprocally, to the fulfillment of a prestation to give, to do, or not to do.
Art. 1318. There is no contract unless the following requisites concur: (1) Consent of the contracting parties; (2) Object certain which is the subject matter of the contract; (3) Cause of the obligation which is established.
As long as the stipulation are not contrary to: 1. Law 2. Morals 3. Good Customs 4. Public Order 5. Public Policy (Art. 1306)
1. The stipulation must be part, not whole of the contract 2. Contracting parties must have clearly & deliberately conferred a favor upon 3rd person 3. 3rd person must have communicated his acceptance 4. Neither of the contracting parties bears the legal representation of the 3rd person
Distinguish consensual from real contracts and name at least four (4) kinds of real contracts under the present law.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
CONSENSUAL CONTRACTS are those which are perfected by mere consent (Art. 1315. Civil Code). CONTRACTS are those which are perfected by the delivery of the object of the obligation. (Art. 1316, Civil Code) Examples of real contracts are deposit, pledge, commodatum and simple loan (mutuum).
Essential Requisites of a Contract (Always COCa-Cola) 1. Consent of the contracting parties; 2. Object certain which is the subject matter of the contract; 3. Cause of the obligation which is established.
I. CONSENT Consent is manifested by the meeting of the offer and the acceptance upon the thing and the cause which are to constitute the contract. The offer must be certain and the acceptance absolute. A qualified acceptance constitutes a counteroffer. (1319)
REQUISITES OF CONSENT: 1. Plurality of subject 2. Capacity 3. Intelligence and free will 4. Manifestation of intent of parties 5. Cognition by the other party 6. Conformity of manifestation and cognition
Theories on Consent
We follow the theory of cognition and not the theory of manifestation. Under our civil law, the offer and acceptance concur only when the offeror comes to know, and not when the offeree merely manifests his acceptance.
When does the offer become ineffective? 1. Death, civil interdiction, insanity or insolvency of either party before acceptance is conveyed; 2. Express or implied revocation of the offer by the offeree; 3. Qualified or conditional acceptance of the offer; 4. Subject matter becomes illegal or impossible before acceptance is communicated.
Advertisements as Offers
Business advertisements of things for sale are not definite offers, but mere invitations to make an offer, unless it appears otherwise.(1325) Advertisements for bidders are simply invitations to make proposals, and the advertiser is not bound to accept the highest or lowest bidder, unless the contrary appears. (1326)
ACCEPTANCE The manifestation by the offeree of his assent to the terms of the offer. Elements of Valid Acceptance 1. Unequivocal 2. Unconditional *If qualified, it constitutes a counteroffer.
ACCEPTANCE
a) offer is made to a person present acceptance must be made immediately b) offer is made to a person absent acceptance may be made within such time that, under normal circumstances, an answer can be received from him; *Acceptance may be revoked before the offeror finds out about it. *Amplified Acceptance - under certain circumstances, a mere amplification on the offer must be understood as an acceptance of the original offer, plus a new offer which is contained in the amplification.
WITHDRAWAL OF ACCEPTANCE
1. First View (Manresa): It is to be observed that although the offeror is not bound until he learns of the acceptance, the same thing can not be said of the offeree who, from the moment he accepts, loses the power to retract such acceptance since the right to withdraw between the time of the acceptance and its communication is a right which is expressly limited by law to the offeror; *To justify the inequality between the contracting parties, Manresa said that since the offeree is the first to know about the concurrence of will if the parties, as a consequence, the obligation, as far as he is concerned, must also commence earlier.
WITHDRAWAL OF ACCEPTANCE
2. Second View (Tolentino): Acceptance may be revoked before it comes to the knowledge of the offeror because in such a case, there is still no meeting of minds, since the revocation has cancelled or nullified the acceptance which thereby ceased to have any legal effect.
Revocation of Acceptance
The acceptance by the offeree may be revoked before reaching the knowledge of the offeror. If it is revoked, the contract is not perfected if the notice of revocation reaches the offeror before the letter of acceptance is received. *In unilateral promises, when offer is made to the public, specific acceptance is not required to bind the obligor.
WHAT IS AN OPTION?
It is a preparatory contract in which one party grants to the other, for a fixed period to decide whether or not to enter into a principal contract.
*An option may be withdrawn anytime before acceptance is communicated but not when supported by a consideration other than purchase price: option money
RULES ON OPTIONS
*A unilateral promise to buy or sell, if not supported by a distinct consideration, may be withdrawn but may not be done whimsically or arbitrarily; the right of the grantee here is damages and not specific performance. (Ang Yu v. CA, 1994) *An option clause in order to be valid and enforceable must indicate the definite price at which the person granting the option is willing to sell, contract can be enforced and not only damages. (Equatorial v. Mayfair, 24 SCRA 483) *The right of first refusal may be enforced by specific performance. (Paranaque Kings v. CA, 1997)
Rule on Contracts Entered into by Insane or Demented Persons or Those Who Were Intoxicated or Hypnotized
Contracts entered into during a lucid interval are valid. Contracts agreed to in a state of drunkenness or during a hypnotic spell are voidable. (1328) The incapacity declared in article 1327 is subject to the modifications determined by law, and is understood to be without prejudice to special disqualifications established in the laws. (1329)
Exceptions on Mistake: 1. Illiterate party (1332) 2. Knowledge of doubt, contingency, risk affecting the object of the contract (1333) 3. Mutual error (1334)
Disqualified to Enter into Contracts Contracts consented into by the following are void: 1. those under civil interdiction 2. hospitalized lepers 3. prodigals 4. deaf and dumb who are unable to read and write 5. those who by reason of age, disease, weak mind and other similar causes, cannot without outside aid, take care of themselves and manage their property, becoming an easy prey for deceit and exploitation.