Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Surviving fraction
1.0
Oxic Hypoxic
0.10
0.01
OER=2.8
0.001
10 15
20 25
30
35
Radiation dose Gy
*with Xrays
Surviving fraction
1.0
Oxic Hypoxic
0.10
0.01
OER=1.6
0.001
10 15
20 25
Radiation dose Gy
DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
OER
2 Venous 1 Arterial
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90 100 (curve A)
100 180 m
Conclusions by Thomlinson and Gray from studies on histological sections of human bronchial carcinoma showing the development of necrosis beyond a limiting distance from the vascular stroma
TUMOR HYPOXIA
Four different subpopulations of tumor cells with respect to oxygenation.
Well oxygenated viable & dividing Well oxygenated viable & non-dividing
TMH TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL TUMOR HYPOXIA There are two types of hypoxia
Transient Hypoxia Intermittent in nature Can be quite severe
Permanent Hypoxia
Unrelieved hypoxia Severe to the point of causing cell death
X-Rays
X-Rays
Etc.
Reoxygenation patterns observed in preclinical tumor models treated with radiation. Tannock and Hill, 1998.
Fibrosarcoma
Osteosarcoma
Survival (%)
Overall and disease-free survival probabilities in patients with advanced cancers of the uterine cervix treated with primary surgery. Hoeckel et al., 1996
Hockel et al reported Higher 5 yr DFS in pts in which median oxygenation measured with polarographic needles was atleast 10mmHg as compared to pts. With Po2 <10mmHg. Higher incidence of pelvic rec. & lower survival rates in anemic pts treated with RT
Evans and Bergsjo et al(1965),Vigario et al(1973),
Milosevic et al (IJROBP 1999;43:1111-1123) showed decrease in tumor oxygenation related to increase in blood viscosity.
Giving BT to maintaining avg. Hb level at that level during t/t is beneficial regardless the Hb at presentation
Misonidazole Etanidazole Pimanidazole RSU-1069 Nimorazole (SER 1.3, +ve for head and neck and cervix) AK 2123 Hyperthermia RSR 13 (Banoxantrone)* Motexafin Gadolinium* HIF-1 Inhibitor*
* Redox modulator in development, not approved by FDA yet
DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
SR 2508 Etanidazole
CH2NHCOCH2CH2OH
Decreased lipophilicity Shorter half life Lesser concn in brain More electron affinic and better sensitizer (x3) Uncharged at acidic PH, and hence higher tumour concentration (X 1.6) Better sensitizer, bifunctional agent and hence highly toxic to hypoxic cells less Neurotoxic but GI toxic
RO 03 8799
CH2CH(OH)CH2N
RSU-1069
CH2CH(OH)CH2N
RO-07-0582
CH2CH(OH)CH2OCH3
hence
cannot
be
used
in
administering smaller dose fractions oxygen effect is less profound at low doses. Thus hypoxic tumour cells would be less radioresistant. If there is sufficient reoxygenation between fractions, a small hypoxic tumour subpopulation would have less influence on response to a sequence of small dose fractions as compared to high dose fractions
First radiation sensitizer used clinically Studies revealed the presence of necrotic zones in human tumours and animal testing demonstrated that 1% to 50% of the clonogenic cells in solid tumours could be radioresistant as a result of hypoxia.
Hyperbaric oxygen chambers were used to tackle the problem of hypoxia. Infeasible because of cumbersome procedure, time involved and fear of accident. Patients compliance Several clinical trial performed using oxygen as radiosensitiser failed to show significant improvement in survival.
Induces prompt reticulocyte response from 2.4% to 4.9% No proof that EPO is superior to BT with impact on clinical outcome. Expensive than BT.
DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
To overcome the vasoconstriction caused by pure oxygen and to improve the blood supply to tumour hence to reduce the chronic hypoxia Nicotinamide, vit.B3 prevents transient fluctuation in tumour blood flow hence reducing the acute hypoxia.
Instead of forcing oxygen into hypoxic cells by use of high pressure tanks, the approach shifted to oxygen substitutes These compounds get selectively activated in the hypoxic environment of tumour cells
TMH TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOXIC CELL SENSITIZERS Selective sensitivity to hypoxic cells at a concentration that would result in acceptable toxicity to normal tissue. Chemical stability and not subject to rapid metabolic breakdown. Must be highly soluble in water or lipid and must be capable of diffusing considerable distance. It should be effective at relatively low daily doses of few grays .
TMH TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MISONIDAZOLE (LAB EXP.) Hypoxic cells in presence of 10nM of misinidazole have radiosensitivity approaching to that of aerated cells.
NIMORAZOLE
Less effective as a radiosensitiser but much less toxic Very large doses could be given In a Danish head and neck trial this compound showed a significant improvement in both locoregional control and survival compared with radiotherapy alone.
Locoregional control was 49% v/s 33% p=0.002 Same trend was also found in overall survival, but not to the significant extent 26% v/s 16% p= 0.32 Conclusion Nimorazole significantly improves effect of radiotherapy managemant of supraglotic and pharynx tumour and can be given without major side effects
n=61 pts , (StgIII=21, StgIV=40) of Advanced SCC H&N, Unsuitable for Sx continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (CHART)+Nimorazole RT=56.75 Gy/36#/12 consecutive days @ 157.64Gy/# Nimorazole=orally or enterally 90 min before radiotherapy at a dose of 1.2, 0.9, and 0.6 g/m2 with the first, second and third daily fractions,respectively. Loco-regional control at 2 years is 55%(StgIII=62%&StgIV=50%) slight increase in acute skin reaction than previovs CHART Nimorazole Toxicity was somewhat greater than those with once daily administration. Grade 3 nausea/vomiting occurred in 22% of pts. 2 pts developed grade 1 peripheral neuropathy 1 pt. died during t/t of encephalopathy.
DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
RT= 62-68Gy/31-34# @ 2Gy/# & 5#/week Nimorazole= 1.2mg/m2 90 min before RT during first 30#s Placebo = Gelatine capsules
Local Tx control
61%
(p = 0.006)
57%
(p = 0.01)
46%
RT Alone
41%
RT= total dose of 4550.8 Gy/2028/45.5 weeks, with further dose escalation by brachytherapy or external beam AK-2123 = 0.6 g/m2 intravenous administration before external beam radiotherapy on alternate days.
DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Vienna HFA-RCT study showed Acturial overall survival 81% at one year,52%at two year and 33% at three year Locoregional controll-61%,55%,55% Radiation dose 64Gy (36Gy + 28Gy off cord) Mitomycin-C i.v. bolus over 10 min 20mg/m2 on day 5 of RT DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
4 YrSurvival (%)
dose escalated HFRT 77.6Gy
4 Yr LRC(%)
28
N = 373
40
34
HFRT 70.6Gy + concurrent Mitomycin-C
50
Both the arms were equal regarding the acute and late toxicities. DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Patients with advanced head and neck cancer were treated with primary curative radiotherapy (66 Gy in 33fractions with five fractions per week) a single injection (15 mg/m2) of MMC at the end of the first week of radiotherapy.
DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
66Gy/33#/6.5weeks
3 Yr LRC (%)
3Yrs LRC(%)
N=161N0
16
P=0.01
18
N = 478
Stage III=223
Stage IV=255
21
66Gy/33#/6.5weeks + concurrent Mitomycin-C
29
Conclusions: The study did not show any major influence of MMC on loco-regional tumour control, survival or morbidity after primary radiotherapy in stage IIIIV head and neck cancer except in N0 patients where loco-regional control was significantly improved. DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Unfortunately, the follow-up study [CATAPULT II]failed to demonstrate similar survival advantages
TPZ (390 mg/m2) + cisplatin (75mg/m2) Vs etoposide (100 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m2).
The TPZ-containing arm proved to be more toxic and less effective. third phase III trial :TPZ paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC.(SWOG0003) PC Vs PC+TPZ Overall survival 8 months 11 months (37% improvement) did not result in improved response, time to progression
DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Mild hyperthermia can improve the tumour reoxygenation, with the degree of reoxygenation correlating with the level of cytotoxicity. In addition to antitumour effect of heat, it has synergistic effect with radiation
MOLECULAR PROFILING
Thank You!