Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Pregnancy
Presenter
Dr Peter N Ebeigbe ,
FMCOG,FWACS
DEPT OF
OBGYN,DELSU,ABRAKA
FORMAT
Introduction Riskfactors
Classification Management
Definitions
Prophylaxis
BP
Conclusion
Proteinuria
Assessing
proteinuria
Etiology/Pathophs
Introduction
A major cause of maternal and perinatal
morbidity and mortality in developing
countries-12% of maternal mortalities
worldwide
Most common medical complication of
pregnancy worldwide
WHO estimates 15% of pregnant women
would have some form of hypertensive
disorder in pregnancy, labour and
puerperium.
In Nigeria…..
Incidences as high as 21.6-26.2% of
all deliveries in hospital based
studies.(Salako et al 2002,Onah
1996)
National survey showed that
Eclampsia contributed 13.0% of all
obstetric complications of pregnancy
and 16.7% of deaths in public sector
referral facilities.(Fmoh 2003)
Pre-eclampsia complicates 5-6% of
all deliveries
…..Nigerian statistics continued
Pre-eclampsia contributed 77.9% 0f
hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
in UBTH (Onyiruka and Okolo 2004)
Eclampsia complicates 1 in 76 to 1 in
335 deliveries with case fatality
rates of 9.3-42.2% with higher rates
in rural areas and Northern Nigeria
Comparatively eclampsia
complicates I in 2041 deliveries in
the UK and 1 in 3704 deliveries in
Nova Scotia ,Canada.
Classification
Varied in literature
Most widely used are those by Davey
and MacGillivray 1988…. Based on
the occurrence of hypertension and
proteinuria
And the classification by Hughes
1972 recommended by the working
group of the National High Blood
Pressure Education program(1990)
of the USA
Classification…Davey and
MacGillivray 1988.
A.Gestational hypertension and/or
proteinuria
1.Gestational hypertension (without
proteinuria)
2.Gestational proteinuria
3.Gestational proteinuric
hypertension(preeclampsia
B.Chronic hypertension and chronic renal
disease
1.chronic hypertension (without
proteinuria)
….contd
2.chronic renal disease(proteinuria with or
without hypertension)
3.chronic hypertension with superimposed
preeclampsia(proteinuria developing in
pregnancy in known chronic
hypertension)
C.Unclassified hypertension and /or
proteinuria.
1 unclassied hypertension
2 ,, proteinuria
3 ,, proteinuric hypertension.
…..contd
D .Eclampsia
The occurrence of generalised
convulsions during
pregnancy,labour,or within 7 days of
delivery and not caused by epilepsy
or other convulsive disorders.
Classification…..Hughes 1972
Pregnancy induced hypertension
1.Hypertension without proteinuria
or pathological edema
2.Pre-eclampsia-with proteinuria and
/or pathological edema
a. mild
b. severe
3 Eclampsia-proteinuria and /or
pathological edema with
convulsions.
……contd
Coincidental hypertension:chronic
underlying hypertension that
antecedes pregnancy or persists
postpartum
Pregnancy –aggravated
hypertension:underlying
hypertension worsened by
pregnancy
1. Superimposed preeclampsia
2.superimposed eclampsia
contd
Transienthypertension:Hypertension
which develops after the
midtrimester of pregnancy and is
characterised by mild elevations of
blood pressure that do not
compromise the pregnancy.This
form of hypertension regresses after
delivery but may return in
subsequent gestations.
DEFINITIONS…..B.P
one measurement of Diastolic Blood
Pressure of 110mmHg or more or two
consecutive measurements of Diastolic
Blood Pressure of > 90mmHg 4 hours or
more apart.
Some authorities recommend blood
pressure greater than 140mmHg systolic
or 90mmHg diastolic
or a rise of 30mmHg or 15mmHg above the
normal pre-pregnancy values after the 20th
week of pregnancy.
Taking Blood pressure
Diagnosis utilizing only a change
from baseline has limited sensitivity(
21-52% and 7-23% for the DBP And
SBP respectively
Take BP with patient sitting or lying
on her side with a 30 degrees tilt.The
upper arm at the same level as the
heart after 10 minutes of rest
Korotkoff IV or V?
Correct size of upper arm cuff should be
used.the bladder of the cuff should
encompass 80% of the upper arm.
Work by Wichman et al 1984 claimed that
frequently muffling of sounds heard down
to zero and that gap btw IV and V was so
great as to render V inaccurate……based
on this ALL BODIES recommended use of
K4
Subsequent work showed these
assertions were wrong
………..IV OR V?
Lopez et al showed in a large
sample that muffling of sounds were
rarely audible till zero <0.5%
Mean difference btw both phases
was around 6mmHg
Phase 5 showed better association
with other outcome variables …
proteinuria,IUGR ,hyperuricemia
…..IV OR IV?
Brown et al comparing direct
intrarterial to mercury
sphygmomanometry in 28 women
found that phase IV overestimated
direct DBP by 9(2,12) and phase V by
4(2,7)
Proteinuria… Davey and
MacGillivray
significant proteinua as one 24hour urine
collection with total protein excretion of
300mg and more; or two random clean
catch or catheter urine specimens with
2+(1g albumin/L) or more on a reagent
strip or 1+(0.3g albumin/L) if the specific
gravity is less than 1030 and pH less than
8.
A few authors suggest that since 0.3g/L of
albumin is the upper limit of urinary
albumin excretion in pregnancy, levels of
albumin of 0.5g/L may be more accurate in
definition of significant proteinuria in
Assessing proteinuria
Qualitative methods
Test strips
Dipstick
High false negative rates 40-53.7%
False negative rate 28%.
Sensitivity 73.5%specificity 44.2%
(Ebeigbe et al 2004)
Dipstick tests
Meyer et al …trace or –ve had negative
predictive value of only 34%
3+ or 4+ positively predictive of severe
pre-eclampsia in only 36%.
Automated devices increase true positive
urinalysis from 48% to 74%
False + rxn…concentrated urine,highly
alkaline urine(ph>8),contamination with
vaginal discharge,antiseptic,UTIs
False –ve rxn….very dilute urine,bence
jones proteins ,mucoproteins
Turbidimetric methods
Sulphosalicylic acid,Trichloroacetic
acid,Alkaline benzothonium chloride.
Short comings similar to dipstick
strips
Quantitative methods
24 hour urine protein
Gold standard
Commonest error –diff in collection
of accurately timed specimen or
incompleteness of collection
Not easy in out patient settings
Up to 36 hour waiting period for
results and to take decision
Quantitative methods contd
2-hour urinary protein estimation
Good correlation with 24 hr urine
protein results
Somanthan found sensitivity of 80%
compared to 50% for dipstick
Good for outpatient setting,time
saving
Quantitative methods
Random urine protein-creatinine ratio
Sensitivity 91-93%
Specificity 88.5-90%
Less than a third false positive rate of
dipsticks and less than a fourth its false
negative rates
Widely used in Australia and New Zealand
Etiology …..theories
Any satisfactory theory should account for
hypertension more commonly developing
in women
Exposed to chorionic villi for the first time
Exposed to superabundance of chorionic
villi as in twins or hydatidiform mole
Has preexisting vascular disease
Is genetically predisposed to hypertension
in pregnancy
Theories…..
Immunologic mechanisms
Genetic predisposition
Dietary deficiencies
Vasoactive compounds
Endothelial dysfunction
Multiple modular approach…
evidence
Poor placentation
Deficient trophoblast invasion
Failure of adaptation of maternal vessels
Increased incidence of placental
insufficiency
Hyperplacentosis
Thank
you
for
Listening