Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Theory in a Nutshell
Standpoint Theory: Our social networks influence: A) how we experience things B) how we understand and communicate with others. Our standpoint affects our world view.
Standpoint Theory
Theorists: Sandra Harding and Julia T. Wood
Interpretive Theory Humanistic Theory Midrange Theory
at UNC-CH Regards all perspectives as partial, BUT feels some are more partial than others based on perspective within different social hierarchies. Womens location on societys margins doesnt equal feminist standpoint.
relationship Example: Those who have been enslaved have a different perspective on the meaning of chains, laws, childbirth and punishment than their captors who participate in the same reality do.
backed by the structure of the society, they have the power to make their world views stick. In essence, they are the ones writing the textbooks.
influence by postmodern theorists like JeanFrancis Lyotard. This suggests a critique of male-centered epistemologies. Epistemologytheory of knowledge
Beloved
Scenes
Silo and the school teacher Mass murder scene School master and Sethe scene
important differences between women and men. Julia Wood believes this is because : Men want more autonomy Women want more connectedness
The evidence is found in each groups communication: Masculine community uses speech to: accomplish tasks assert self gain power. Feminine community uses speech to: build relationships Include others Show responsiveness Wood believes gender differences are there because of cultural expectations and gender treatment.
emphasize the importance of social location. Why: Belief that only the priviledeged can define gender roles or anything else in a culture.
(page 445) When Sixo denies stealing the young pig, the school teacher takes on the role of Grand Interpreter. While Sixo was clever, the schoolteacher beat him anyways to prove the point that definitions only belong to the definers.
in the underclass.
Standpoint theorists do maintain, however, that the
perspectives of subordinate groups are more complete and thus, better than those of privileged groups in a society.
Strong Objectivity:
The strategy of starting research from the lives of women and other marginalized groups, thus providing a less false view of reality.
Objectivity: She suggests not only taking all viewpoints into account but also suggests that comprehension produced from the standpoint of dominated groups offers, by contrast, only a weak objectivity.
It is absurd to imagine the U.S. slave owners view of Africans and African Americans lives could outweigh in impartiality, disinterestedness, impersonality, and objectivity their slaves view of their own and slave owners lives.
Harding emphasizes that it is the objective perspective from womens lives that provides a preferred standpoint from which to generate research projects, hypothesis, and interpretations. Perhaps such research could seriously explore perceptions of a fate worse than death.
at Brandeis University Claims: patterns of intersecting oppressions African American women face in the United States have placed them in a different marginalized position in society compared to white women or black men.
the U.S. black women in domestic work coupled with racial segregation in housing and schools
Meaning it helped these women construct knowledge of how to survive in the world. Along with other AfricanAmerican feminist Collins feels they are a unique group set undeniably apart because of race and sex with a unique set of challenges.
She believes there are four ways black women validate knowledge claims.
Living through actual experiences means those individuals are more credible then those who just read about the experiences. The use of dialogue in assessing knowledge claims: Everyone has to participate in the experiment. If one person does not it is considered cheating. The ethic of caring: Emotion equals a way to show how powerful the argument can be. The ethic of personal accountability: The knowledge of the experience that someone claims has happened to them can all be evaluated based on the individuals character, values, and ethics.
Harvard University Wants to maintain that a universal ethical standard is a viable possibility. Sets out to defend the tradition of universalism in the face of this triplepronged critique by engaging the claims of feminism, communitarianism, and postmodernism.
major attacks on Enlightenment rationality and Habermas discourse ethics 1. Postmodern Critique 2. Communitarian Critique 3. Feminist Critique
Seyla Benhabib
Postmodern Critique
Jean-Francois Lyotard states
Communitarian Critique
Communitarians and postmodernists
that there are no longer any grand narratives on which to base a universal version of truth. Senhabib disagrees, saying that rather than reaching a consensus on how everyone should act, interacting individuals can align themselves with a common good.
are drawn together by the idea that the critique of Western rationality as seen from the perspective of the margins, from the standpoint of what and whom it excludes suppresses, delegitimatizes, renders mad, imbecilic or childish. Benhabib realizes the risk of creating a global moral template to apply to every situation. So, to avoid this risk, Benhabib stresses the idea that any panhuman ethic can be achieved through interaction with collective concrete others instead.
Wood, and Cheris Kramarae all concur that the way women experience something and then retell what happened is different from the way men experience something and talk about what happened. Main point: Regardless of these three critiques, Benhabib believes that a new breed of universal ethic is still possible. She likes to believe that this may include a obligation of helping people survive and flourish.
miscalculate the function that language plays in conveying ones sense of self and the perception of the world. Along with many other theorists, they feel peoples communication choices are never neutral or freevalue, so people cant separate their standpoint from the language they used to describe it. Words that are chosen are based on individuals cultural and societal filters.
2.Theoristsve ai.Sandra Harding and her background Aii.Julia T. Wood and her background B. Termsstandpoint i. Synonymous with viewpoint, perspective, outlook and position. ii. Claim that the social groups within which we are located powerfully shape what we experience and know as well as how we understand and communicate with ourselves, others, and the world. Essentially, our standpoint affects our world view. iii. How the theory came to bepeople who influenced it George Hegel Info about him---master-slave relationship b. Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels i. Proletarian standpoint/ideal knowers ii. How its similar to feminist standpoint theory cd. MovieBeloved. Jean-Francois Lyotard -how postmodernism is woven into this -post modernists applaud the standpoint emphasis on knowledge
a. i.
Postmodern critique: Communitarian crique: Communitarians and postmodernists are drawn together by the idea that the critique of Western rationality as seen from the perspective of the margins, from the standpoint of what and whom it excludes suppresses, delegitimatizes, renders mad, imbecilic or childish. Benhabib realizes the risk of creating a global moral template to apply to every situation. So, to avoid this risk, Benhabib stresses the idea that any panhuman ethic can be achieved through interaction with collective concrete others instead. Collective concrete others-ordinary people who live in a community.