Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
NATURE OF COSTS
Actual cost: cost incurred in production Opportunity cost: return from the second best use of firms resources which the firm foregoes in order to avail the return Explicit / Accounting Costs : Actual money spent in purchasing or hiring services of factor
NATURE OF COSTS
Fixed costs: Costs which do not change with change in O/P Variable or Prime costs: Costs which change with change in level of O/P Accounting costs: Cost as stated in books of accounts (explicit cost only) Economic Costs: includes both explicit & implicit cost
NATURE OF COSTS
Marginal cost: Change in total cost associated with a one-unit change in output Incremental Costs: Total additional cost of implementing a managerial decision
NATURE OF COSTS
Private cost: Actually incurred or provided for by an individual for its business activity Social cost: Cost to society on account of production of good Original cost: cost incurred originally
EXERCISE
A Carpenter makes 100 chairs per month & sells them at Rs 150 per piece. His expenses on rent of shop, cost of wood & other materials are worth Rs 5000. He employs 2 workers whose monthly wage bill stand at Rs 2400 & pays electricity bill of Rs 500 per month. He has invested Rs 50,000 in the form of machines, tools & inventories of which Rs 25,000 is from his own fund & remaining 25,000 is a loan from bank at interest rate of 18% p.a. Assuming imputed cost of his own time, own shop & own savings of Rs 25000 as Rs 3000, Rs 1000 & Rs 250 respectively, find: Explicit cost Implicit cost Accounting profit Economic profit
ANSWERS
Explicit cost : Rs 8275 Implicit cost: Rs 4250 Accounting profit: Rs 6725 Economic profit: Rs 2475
COST FUNCTION
C = f (S, O, P, T) Where: C: Cost of O/P S: Size of plant O: level of O/P P: price of I/Ps used in production T: nature of technology
TC = TFC + TVC
Total Fixed Cost = TFC Total Variable Cost = TVC
TFC
60
TVC
0
TC
60
AFC
-
AVC
-
ATC
-
MC
-
1
2 3 4 5
60
60 60 60 60
20
30 45 80 135
80
90 105 140 195
60
30 20 15 12
20
15 15 20 27
80
45 35 35 39
20
10 15 35 55
Cost
250
200
150
100
50
TFC
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Output
Cost
90
80
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4
AFC
5 6
Output
AFC declines steadily over the range of production In general, AVC, AC, and MC are U shaped When MC<AVC, AVC is falling When MC>AVC, AVC is rising When MC=AVC, AVC is at its minimum The distance between AC and AVC represents AFC
Q (TP) 0 1,000 3,000 6,000 8,000 9,000 9,500 9,850 10,000 9,850
Total variable cost (TVC) is the cost associated with the variable input, in this case labor Assume that labor can be hired at a price (w) of Rs 500 per unit
Q (TP) 0
MP
TVC (wL) 0
MC (TVC/ Q)
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1000
3000 6000 8000 9000 9500 9850 10000 9850
1000
2000 3000 2000 1000 500 350 150 -150
500
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
0.5
0.25 0.16 0.25 0.5 1 1.4 3.33
TP and TVC are mirror images of each other When TP increase at an increasing rate, TVC increase at a decreasing rate
When MP is increasing, MC is decreasing When MP is decreasing, MC is increasing Also when MP= AP at max AP, MC = AVC at min AVC
TVC (wL) 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500
Q/L
APL
EXERCISE
Given Total Cost function: TC = 1000 + 10 Q 0.9 Q 2 + 0.04 Q 3 Find the rate of O/P that result in minimum Average Variable cost
All I/Ps variable No fixed costs LR cost structure of firm is related to firms long run production process which is described by RTS Economists hypothesize that a firms long-run production function may exhibit at first IRS then CRS & finally DRS
IRS: A proportional increase in all I/Ps increases O/P by a greater percentage than costs Costs increase at a decreasing rate CRS: A proportional increase in all I/Ps increases O/P by same percentage as costs Costs increase at a constant rate DRS: A proportional increase in all I/Ps increases O/P by a smaller percentage than costs Costs increase at an increasing rate
LAC
It shows the lowest average cost of producing each level of O/P when the firm can build the most appropriate plant to produce each level of O/P
When LAC declines: firm experiences economies of scale (per-unit costs are falling) When LAC increases: firm experiences diseconomies of scale (per-unit costs are rising)
ECONOMIES OF SCALE
Internal Real economies Specialization Indivisibility Advertising Team work External Pecuniary economies Quantity discounts Lower cost of capital transportation Sales promotion
DISECONOMIES OF SCALE
Congestion Scarcity of resources Difficulty in Coordination & control
O/P level at which AC is minimum Necessary condition: (AC) / Q = 0 Sufficient condition: 2(AC) / Q2 > 0
Value of plant size (K) at which total cost (C) is minimum Necessary condition: C / K = 0 Sufficient condition: 2C / K2 > 0
EXAMPLE Fixed cost = Rs 10,000 Price = Rs 20 AVC = Rs 15 How much O/P should the firm produce to have a profit of Rs 20,000? Answer: 6000 units
(P - AVC)
EXAMPLE
Fixed cost = Rs 10,000 Price = Rs 20 AVC = Rs 15 How much O/P should the firm produce in order to break even?
EXCERCISE
TC
TR
Profit
40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
DOL = % = / = * Q = E %Q Q/Q Q
= PQ - TFC + (AVC)(Q) = Q(P - AVC) - TFC = Q(P - AVC)
DOL = Q(P - AVC)Q = Q(P - AVC) Q[Q(P - AVC) - TFC] Q(P - AVC) - TFC
Workers improve with practice so per unit cost of additional O/P declines Measures % decrease in additional labor cost each time O/P doubles An 80 percent learning curve implies that each time O/P doubles, L costs associated with incremental output decrease to 80% of previous level
To forecast needs of
personnel
machinery raw materials
The reduction of a firms unit cost by producing two or more goods or services jointly rather than separately Degree of economies of scope = TC(Q1) + TC(Q2) TC(Q1 + Q2)
TC(Q1 + Q2)
EXAMPLE
Firm A produces 100 units of X & 500 units of Y per month at the TC of Rs 1,00,000. If X & Y are produced separately by firms B & C then the TC to firm B of producing 100 X is Rs 25000 & firm C of producing 500 Y is Rs 90,000. Check whether firm A is experiencing economies or diseconomies of scope
Answer: 0.15 so economies of scope NOTE: Positive: economies of scope Negative: diseconomies of scope