Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Types of investors. Concept of investor protection. Regulatory bodies responsible in investor protection. Securities Commission Bursa Malaysia Central Bank of Malaysia Current scenario of investor protection in Malaysia. Examples of cases of misconduct. Where we are now? Suggestion for improvement in investor protection. Conclusion.
Angel investors.
Invest
Have
in high-growth companies.
have contacts.
Venture capitalist.
Investment
Corporate investor Usually in the form of large multi-national companies. Often buy companies for long haul and dont want to exit.
Safeguarding the interest of investors. Relates to corporate governance. Why investor protection in crucial?
Securities Commission (SC) Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad (Bursa Malaysia) Bank Negara Malaysia (Central Bank of Malaysia)
Main regulator of the securities and capital market. Ultimate responsibility of protecting investor. The regulator of the Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad.
Comes into force on 28 September 2007. the investor protection provisions of sections 91, 92, 93 and 97 (Appendix 3 of the CMSA).
The main intention to accord protection to the customers through appropriate disclosures by registered persons to mitigate conflict of interest situations. The investor protection provisions are not intended to be used by any parties to secure market advantage.
9 DECEMBER 2010 Covered for 2011 to 2020 plan. to expand the role of capital market to next level.
Raise intermediary capabilities and standards of conduct Strengthen oversight of products and markets and enhance system-wide risk management
An act to make provisions with respect to stock exchanges and persons dealing in securities, and for certain offences relating to trading in securities, and for other purposes connected therewith
to make the Malaysian capital market the preferred fund-raising venue for Malaysian companies.
Fountain View
CASES OF MISCONDUCT
Suremax
7 January 2011 : Datuk Phillip Wong Chee Keong, 48, and Francis Bun Lit Chun, 41, were convicted under s84(1) of the SIA for creating a misleading appearance of active trading in the shares of Suremax by trading in nine accounts without any change in the beneficial ownership of the shares on the stock exchange DPWCK : 24 months imprisonment and a fine of RM 3million (in default 6 months imprisonment ) and FBLC : 3 months imprisonment and a fine of RM2 million (in default 6 months imprisonment)
Judge Komathy SM Suppiah : The Court has to set imprisonment terms as the new benchmark in securities cases. The securities market should be real and genuine. Market manipulation is a serious offence affecting the confidence of investors and thus imprisonment sentence should be meted out.
Case : Manipulation of Fountain View Development Bhd shares (18 November 2003 and 20 January 2004) Dato' Chin Chan Leong, 57, a former director of Fountain View : under section 84(1) of the Securities Industry Act 1983 create a misleading appearance of active trading of Fountain View shares on Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (now known as Bursa Malaysia Securities Bhd) through at least 20 CDS accounts which were beneficially owned by the accused through the companies that he controlled Hiew Yoke Lan, 48 a former remisier : under section 84(1) read together with section 122C(c) of the Securities Industry Act 1983 executing and relaying orders for the sale and purchase of the shares during the material time to various stockbroking firms
DCCL : fine of RM1.3 million (in default 13 months imprisonment) as well as a one-day imprisonment under section 88B of the same Act HYL : was fined RM1 million (in default 10 months imprisonment)
engaging in intra-day short selling which was carried out by the DR in his siblings account, the DRs dealing activities was not closely monitored by the PO and the DR continued with his intra-day short selling activities sales of shares were carried out by the DR when the clients account did not have the requisite tradable balance of the shares for the sale transactions to be carried out PO has subsequently implemented corrective action by suspending the DRs dealing activities and establishing a monitoring mechanism thereafter to identify possible short selling activities on the next trading day DR was imposed a fine of RM10,000 and a deferred suspension (6 months suspension deferred for 2 years).
Strength
Transparency
Japan
Thailand Indonesia India
7.0
7.7 6.0 6.0
Korea
Cambodia China Philippines
5.3
5.3 5.0 4.0
Vietnam
Laos
2.7
1.7
Transparency of Transactions
Extend of disclosure principles
helps the public to understand the companys activities, policies and performance with regard to environmental and ethical standards as well as the relationship of the company with the stakeholders and communities which are affected by its operation
Asian Countries
Extent of Disclosure Index 1-10 (Yr. 2010)
Singapore Hong Kong Malaysia Thailand China Indonesia Japan India Korea Vietnam Cambodia Philippines Laos
10 10 10 10 10 10 7 7 7 6 5 2 0
Singapore Malaysia Cambodia Hong Kong China Thailand Japan Indonesia India Laos Korea Philippines Vietnam
9 9 9 8 1 7 6 5 4 3 2 2 0
India
Korea Malaysia Thailand China Indonesia Vietnam
7
7 7 6 4 3 2
Cambodia
Laos
2
2
Regulators must be more aggressive in ensuring consistent investor protection for all capital market products and services Instill awareness among investors and educate them on their rights
The regulators has been proactively protect investors and handle market misconduct cases because such activities will severely undermine investor confidence and tarnishes the reputation of the Malaysian capital market. Regulators should continue to be vigilant and take whatever action necessary to protect investors and to maintain a fair and orderly capital market.