Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Dr Athina Vlachantoni Centre for Research on Ageing University of Southampton, United Kingdom
Help Age International, London, 7th October 2011
Overview Understanding the factors affecting womens pension accumulation Framing gender and old-age pension protection within the Asian region A double jeopardy for women? The role of social pensions
2) Insurance against longevity risk How do we ensure we dont outlive our resources?
3) Redistribution (and poverty reduction) How do we target the oldest and the poorest?
4
Consumption
Age
Normal lifecourse
Insecure lifecourse
Lifecourse In poverty
Source: Adjusted from Barrientos (2004) in Lloyd-Sherlock (ed) Living Longer. Zed Books.
= =
= =
= =
10
Source: UN (2009) World Population Prospects, The 2008 Revision Population Database
11
S.E. Asia
S.C. Asia
E.Asia
Asia
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Women
Men
12
14
Figure 5: Employment rates of those aged 15 and over, by region and gender, Asian regions, 2008
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Asia Eastern Asia South-Central SouthWestern Asia Asia Eastern Asia Men Women
15
Figure 6: Employment rates of those aged 15 and over, selected countries, by gender, 2008
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Ca m bo di a Th ai la nd M al ay sia na ng ap or e Ka za kh st an Ja pa n et na m Ch i Ta jik is ta n
Men Women
Vi
Si
16
Figure 7: Labour force participation rates by gender, Japan, 1990 and 2008
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75 and over
17
18
Figure 8: Proportion of employees among the total employed population, by gender, Asian regions, 2010
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 South Asia South-East Asia and the Pacific East Asia World Men Women
19
20
Figure 9: Living arrangements of older people in Africa, Asia, L. America and the Caribbean
Source: UN, 2005. NB: Older people defined as aged 60 and over.
21
Figure 10: Proportion of older people living with their children, 2005
22
Table 1: Proportion of older men and women living alone, various years
Country
Japan Malaysia Kyrgyzstan Thailand Philippines
Source: UN 2005
Year
2000 1991 1997 1995 1998
Men
n/a 4.7 5.3 2.9 4
Women Total
n/a 8.7 12.2 5.5 6.4 12.7 6.8 9.3 4.3 5.3
23
Figure 11: Proportion of persons aged 60 and over living alone, selected Asian countries, 1980-2000
14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1980-3 1990 2000 China Japan Malaysia Singapore Thailand Indonesia India
Source: UN 2005
24
Source: Ofstedal et al 2004 Note: Multiple responses result in bars not adding up to 100% for each gender group.
25
27
Figure 14: Remittances flows to less developed countries, by region, 2007-2012 ($ billion)
120 100 East Asia and Pacific 80 60 40 20 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Europe and Central Asia Latin America and Caribbean Middle East and North Africa South Asia Sub-Saharan Africa
28
30
-personal pension
Non-contributory
-means-tested
-universal (social pensions) Other (savings, home ownership, access to health, family support, community support)
31
Figure 15: Effective extent of coverage and active contributors to a pension scheme in the working-age population, Japan, Malaysia and Vietnam (%)
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Japan Malaysia Effective extent of coverage Vietnam
33
63.7
33.9 20.1 4.5 5.1 6.5 8.3 9.9 14.3 24.8 27.6
Vi
Universal
So uth
Af ric
Br az il
Non-contributory (beneficial for those with interrupted working histories and inadequate contributions) When conditional only upon age, such programmes are a symbolic recognition of old age (eg. Renta Dignidad in Bolivia for those aged 60 and over)
When means-tested (on household total income or individual pension income), such programmes can provide policymakers with clues on womens sources of income Eligibility criteria can target women to a greater extent (eg. unconditionally to all aged 70 and over, conditionally to all widows aged 60 and over) Significant evidence of the impact of social pension for the household of the recipient as a whole
35
Administrative challenges and efficiency issues, eg. nonclaiming, difficulties proving age of eligibility, how to target rural vs. urban (eg. Brazil) etc.
Indirect consequences of policy-making Eg. Do social pensions undermine intra-household distribution of resources and gender relations? Eg. Could social pensions contribute to womens overrepresentation of workers in the informal sector?
36
37
Thank you
38