Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
S = V I* PF = Cos() Q = V I sin()
I Ia Ir V
Ir V
S P
Q V
P Q
PF
1.0 0.5 0.93 1.0 0.85 0.5 0.7 to 0.8 0.17 0.73 0.85 0.8
Welding
Loaded At 0%
Induction Motors Loaded At 50% Loaded At 100%
Arc Furn.
Arc Furnace
CONCEPT OF PF IMPROVEMENT
QT PL,ST
PL QL
Qc
SL
SL
QL
ST PL
Qc
QT
ADVANTAGES OF PF IMPROVEMENT
1- Reduce Electricity Billl (customer) 2- Reduction of cable size (Customer)
Multiplying factor for the cross-sectional area of the cable core Power Factor 1 1 1.25 0.8 1.67 0.6 2.5 0.4
3- Reduction of Losses (Utility + Customer) 4- Reduction of Voltage Drop (Utility) 5- Increase Equipment Capacity (utility)
Transformers, Feeders, T.L.,
TYPICAL EXAMPLE
Line Loading
Transformer Loading
0%
11.31 kV
ck sl a
Amps
0%
11.31 kV
MVA
0.391 kV
0.00 AMP
3
0.000 Mvar
UNCOMPENSTED LOAD
Line Loading Transformer Loading
39%
11.31 kV
sl a ck
Amps
94%
10.71 kV
MVA
0.349 kV
40.45 AMP
3
0.000 Mvar
COMPENSATED LOAD
Line Loading Transformer Loading
25%
11.31 kV
ck sl a
Amps
63%
11.02 kV
MVA
0.380 kV
26.23 AMP
3
0.500 Mvar
COMPARISON
Case No-Load Uncomp. Load VL (V) ILine (A) Ploss (kW) Trans Feeder Pgenerated Load % Load % MW
0 40.45 26.23
0 30 12
0 94 63
0 39 25
0 0.530 0.512
Compens. Load
PRACTICAL MEASUREMENT OF PF
If the consumer does not correct the PF, the penalty increases after three months to:
The utility also has the right to discontinue service if the consumer does not correct the PF within another six months.
Fixed capacitors
This arrangement employs one or more capacitor(s) to form a constant level of compensation. This configuration is usually applied in cases where the level of load is almost constant.
CT
Regulator