Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Problem Statement
To what extent are childrens and adolescents positive (i.e., adaptive) and negative (i.e., clinical) behavior ratings a result of basic demographic conditions (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity)? Are childrens behavioral ratings comparably reliable as a result of these basic demographic conditions? What percent of the variance in childrens behavioral ratings is associated with basic demographic conditions? To what extent do childrens behavioral ratings differ as a result of race/ethnicity and gender?
Method
Students behaviors were rated by their mothers or fathers during the standardization of a new behavior rating scale, Clinical Assessment of Behavior (Bracken & Keith, 2004). Students positive and negative (i.e., clinical) behaviors were compared directly (i.e., mean score comparisons) and indirectly (e.g., percent of variance accounted for by demographic variables; internal consistency estimates)
Instrument
Clinical Assessment of Behavior (CAB; Bracken & Keith, 2004). Third-party behavior rating scale completed by parents and teachers (Parent form used in this study) Appropriate for children ages 2 - 18 years Assesses Clinical behaviors (Psychopathology, sociopathy, educational exceptionalities) and Adaptive behaviors Used as triangulating element in multi-source, multinstrument clinical assessments
CAB Assesses:
Critical Behaviors: low-incidence behaviors that define serious psychopathology and sociopathy Psychotic experiences (e.g., hallucinations) Substance abuse Satanic worship Gang-related behaviors Behaviors exhibited in medical and neuropsychological conditions Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders Learning disabilities Executive function strengths and limitations Autistic spectrum behaviors
CAB Assesses:
Behaviors that correspond to educational exceptionalities and conditions Mental retardation Learning disabilities Gifted and talented Adaptive behaviors Social skills Behaviors of current societal concern Aggression Anger management Bullying Conduct problems
Clinical Scales
Internalizing Behaviors Scale (INT) Assesses behaviors directed toward self (e.g., depression, anxiety, somatization, fear)
- cries easily; is easily startled; is emotionally fragile
Externalizing Behaviors Scale (EXT) Assesses problematic conduct directed toward others (e.g., rulebreaking behaviors, vandalism, truancy)
- insults others; is difficult to manage; ignores rules
Critical Behaviors Scale (CRI) Assesses behaviors associated with serious psychopathology and sociopathy
- uses illegal drugs; hallucinates; expresses an unusual interest in Satan
Adaptive Scales
Social Skills Scale (SOC) Assesses interpersonal relations with peers and adults
- listens attentively to others; is considerate of others; annoys others
Competence Scale (COM) Focuses on ability to get needs met appropriately, learning, and cognitive and language development
- has poor judgment; is easily confused; learns new things easily
Adaptive Behaviors Scale (ADB) Assesses developmental progress and degree of personal independence
- dresses self; reliably makes simple purchases; prepares simple meals for self
30 30 20 170
18 18 -70
18 18 -70
Other 6 8%
Normative Sample
Education Level < 11 years 12 years 13 - 15 years 16 years > 17 years Unknown Geographic Region Midwest Northeast South West 21 25% 13 22% 35 45% 19 22% 17 22% 22 25% 36 39% 17 20% CAB-P 3.9% 23.9% 38.7% 14.6% 18.8% 0.1% CAB-T 3.2% 2.5% 11.4% 17.5% 65.2% 0.2%
r
.95 .97 .91 .95 .94 .92
Clusters
Anxiety (ANX) Depression (DEP) Anger (ANG) Aggression (AGG) Bullying (BUL) Conduct Problems (CP) Attention-Deficit (ADH) Autistic Spectrum (AUT) Learning Disability (LD) Mental Retardation (MR) Executive Function (EF) Gifted and Talented (GAT)
r
.93 .95 .93 .95 .97 .92 .94 .92 .92 .91 .91 .94
Total (CBI)
.98
CAB PX Stability
Scale Internalizing Externalizing Critical Behaviors Social Skills Competence Adaptive Behaviors CAB Behavioral Index CAB Clusters CAB-PX .89 .90 .77 .92 .92 .87 .94 .83 - .94
CAB-PX* .78 .81 .41 .62 .79 .53 .82 .70 - .90
Analyses
Estimates of total scale internal consistency by race Estimates of percent scale variance accounted for by basic demographic variables Scale and cluster mean score comparisons for basic demographic variables
Gender Differences
Main Effect for Gender by Race ANOVA
(No significant gender by race interactions)
Scales
Internalizing Behaviors (INT) Externalizing Behaviors (EXT) Critical Behaviors (CRI) Social Skills (SOC) Competence (COM) Adaptive Behaviors (ADB)
p
ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
Clusters
Anxiety (ANX) Depression (DEP) Anger (ANG) Aggression (AGG) Bullying (BUL) Conduct Problems (CP) Attention-Deficit (ADH) Autistic Spectrum (AUT) Learning Disability (LD) Mental Retardation (MR) Executive Function (EF) Gifted and Talented (GAT)
p
ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
Total (CBI)
Race/Ethnicity Differences*
*Main effect for Race/ethnicity, with no interactions Only INT revealed differences on post hoc analyses due to conservative nature of Scheffe Scales
Internalizing Behaviors Whites > Blacks Externalizing Behaviors Critical Behaviors Social Skills Competence Adaptive Behaviors
p
.05 ns .05 ns ns ns ns
Clusters
Anxiety (ANX) Depression (DEP) Anger (ANG) Aggression (AGG) Bullying (BUL) Conduct Problems (CP) Attention-Deficit (ADH) Autistic Spectrum (AUT) Learning Disability (LD) Mental Retardation (MR) Executive Function (EF) Gifted and Talented (GAT)
p
.05 .05 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
Total (CBI)
Conclusions
Minimal variance in clinical and adaptive behaviors due to basic demographic variables (except age in developmental conditions - - adaptive behavior) CAB produces minimal mean score differences as a result of basic demographic variables (gender, race/ethnicity) Behaviors assessed by the CAB, both adaptive and pathological, appear to be normally distributed within the greater population. CAB appears to produce highly reliable assessment of the behavior of youth regardless of age, race, or gender