57 views

Uploaded by Babasab Patil (Karrisatte)

about The Basics of Capital Budgeting Evaluating Cash Flows

- Test Bank - Chapter14 Capital Budgeting
- Summary of Capital Budgeting Techniques Gitman
- Capital Budgeting and Cash Flow Projection
- Acca Tips
- Heritage Doll Company Project Evaluation
- Engineering Economics Semester Test
- ch12 mgt advisory
- Project Mang Project.
- NPV,IRR,ROI
- Capital Budgeting
- ch12.doc
- ch12
- 4.Unit-4 Capital Budgeting
- MGT333
- NPV and IRR
- Capital Budgeting in the National Iranian Petrochemical Company Using the Markowitz Model
- Capital Budgeting
- Syllabus ICMA
- 1. Capital Budgeting Practices
- chp5

You are on page 1of 59

Should we build this plant?

Analysis of potential additions to fixed assets. Long-term decisions; involve large expenditures. Very important to firms future.

Steps

1. Estimate CFs (inflows & outflows). 2. Assess riskiness of CFs. 3. Determine k = WACC for project. 4. Find NPV and/or IRR. 5. Accept if NPV > 0 and/or IRR > WACC.

Projects are: independent, if the cash flows of one are unaffected by the acceptance of the other. mutually exclusive, if the cash flows of one can be adversely impacted by the acceptance of the other.

Cost (negative CF) followed by a series of positive cash inflows. One change of signs. Nonnormal Cash Flow Project: Two or more changes of signs. Most common: Cost (negative CF), then string of positive CFs, then cost to close project. Nuclear power plant, strip mine.

0 + 1 + + + + 2 + + + + 3 + + + 4 + + + + 5 + + N N NN N N NN NN

The number of years required to recover a projects cost, or how long does it take to get the businesss money back?

0 CFt -100 Cumulative -100 PaybackL = 2 + 1 10 -90 30/80 2

2.4

3 80 50

60 100 -30 0

= 2.375 years

0 CFt -100 1

1.6 2

3 20 40

70 100 50 -30 0 20

Strengths of Payback: 1. Provides an indication of a projects risk and liquidity. 2. Easy to calculate and understand. Weaknesses of Payback: 1. Ignores the TVM. 2. Ignores CFs occurring after the payback period.

0 CFt PVCFt -100 -100 10% 1 10 9.09 -90.91 2 60 49.59 -41.32 3 80 60.11 18.79

n

n

NPV !

t !1

CFt

1 k

CF0 .

Project L: 0 -100.00 10% 1 10 2 60 3 80

NPVS = $19.98.

Calculator Solution

Enter in CFLO for L: -100 10 60 80 10 CF0 CF1 CF2 CF3 I NPV = 18.78 = NPVL

NPV = PV inflows - Cost = Net gain in wealth. Accept project if NPV > 0. Choose between mutually exclusive projects on basis of higher NPV. Adds most value.

If Projects S and L are mutually exclusive, accept S because NPVs > NPVL . If S & L are independent, accept both; NPV > 0.

0 CF0 Cost 1 CF1 2 CF2 Inflows 3 CF3

IRR is the discount rate that forces PV inflows = cost. This is the same as forcing NPV = 0.

CFt ! NPV. t t ! 0 1 k

n

CFt t ! 0. t ! 0 1 IRR

n

0

IRR = ?

1 10

2 60

3 80

Enter CFs in CFLO, then press IRR: IRRL = 18.13%. IRRS = 23.56%.

0 -100

INPUTS OUTPUT 3

N I/YR IRR = ?

1 40

2 40

-100

PV

3 40

40

PMT

0

FV

9.70%

Q. A.

How is a projects IRR related to a bonds YTM? They are the same thing. A bonds YTM is the IRR if you invest in the bond.

1

IRR = ?

0 -1,134.2

10

...

90 90 1,090

If IRR > WACC, then the projects rate of return is greater than its cost-- some return is left over to boost stockholders returns. Example: WACC = 10%, IRR = 15%. Profitable.

If IRR > k, accept project. If IRR < k, reject project.

If S and L are independent, accept both. IRRs > k = 10%. If S and L are mutually exclusive, accept S because IRRS > IRRL .

Enter CFs in CFLO and find NPVL and NPVS at different discount rates:

k 0 5 10 15 20 NPVL 50 33 19 7 (4) NPVS 40 29 20 12 5

NPV ($)

60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 -10 5 10 15 20 23.6

NPVL 50 33 19 7 (4)

NPVS 40 29 20 12 5

IRRS = 23.6%

IRRL = 18.1%

NPV and IRR always lead to the same accept/reject decision for independent projects:

NPV ($) IRR > k and NPV > 0 Accept. k > IRR and NPV < 0. Reject.

k (%) IRR

NPV

L

k < 8.7: NPVL> NPVS , IRRS > IRRL CONFLICT k > 8.7: NPVS> NPVL , IRRS > IRRL NO CONFLICT

IRRS

8.7

%

IRRL

1. Find cash flow differences between the projects. See data at beginning of the case. 2. Enter these differences in CFLO register, then press IRR. Crossover rate = 8.68%, rounded to 8.7%. 3. Can subtract S from L or vice versa, but better to have first CF negative. 4. If profiles dont cross, one project dominates the other.

1. Size (scale) differences. Smaller project frees up funds at t = 0 for investment. The higher the opportunity cost, the more valuable these funds, so high k favors small projects. 2. Timing differences. Project with faster payback provides more CF in early years for reinvestment. If k is high, early CF especially good, NPVS > NPVL.

NPV assumes reinvest at k (opportunity cost of capital). IRR assumes reinvest at IRR. Reinvest at opportunity cost, k, is more realistic, so NPV method is best. NPV should be used to choose between mutually exclusive projects.

Managers like rates--prefer IRR to NPV comparisons. Can we give them a better IRR?

Yes, MIRR is the discount rate which causes the PV of a projects terminal value (TV) to equal the PV of costs. TV is found by compounding inflows at WACC. Thus, MIRR assumes cash inflows are reinvested at WACC.

0 -100.0

10%

1 10.0

10% MIRR = 16.5%

2 60.0

10%

-100.0 PV outflows

To find TV with 10B, enter in CFLO: CF0 = 0, CF1 = 10, CF2 = 60, CF3 = 80 I = 10 NPV = 118.78 = PV of inflows. Enter PV = -118.78, N = 3, I = 10, PMT = 0. Press FV = 158.10 = FV of inflows. Enter FV = 158.10, PV = -100, PMT = 0, N = 3. Press I = 16.50% = MIRR.

MIRR correctly assumes reinvestment at opportunity cost = WACC. MIRR also avoids the problem of multiple IRRs. Managers like rate of return comparisons, and MIRR is better for this than IRR.

0 -800 1 5,000 2 -5,000

k = 10%

Enter CFs in CFLO, enter I = 10. NPV = -386.78 IRR = ERROR. Why?

We got IRR = ERROR because there are 2 IRRs. Nonnormal CFs--two sign changes. Heres a picture:

NPV

NPV Profile

IRR2 = 400%

1. At very low discount rates, the PV of CF2 is large & negative, so NPV < 0. 2. At very high discount rates, the PV of both CF1 and CF2 are low, so CF0 dominates and again NPV < 0. 3. In between, the discount rate hits CF2 harder than CF1, so NPV > 0. 4. Result: 2 IRRs.

Could find IRR with calculator: 1. Enter CFs as before. 2. Enter a guess as to IRR by storing the guess. Try 10%: 10 STO IRR = 25% = lower IRR Now guess large IRR, say, 200: 200 STO IRR = 400% = upper IRR

When there are nonnormal CFs and more than one IRR, use MIRR:

0 -800,000 1 5,000,000 2 -5,000,000

Accept Project P?

NO. Reject because MIRR = 5.6% < k = 10%. Also, if MIRR < k, NPV will be negative: NPV = -$386,777.

S and L are mutually exclusive and will be repeated. k = 10%. Which is better? (000s) 0 1 2 60 33.5 33.5 33.5 3 4

NPVL > NPVS. But is L better? Cant say yet. Need to perform common life analysis.

Note that Project S could be repeated after 2 years to generate additional profits. Can use either replacement chain or equivalent annual annuity analysis to make decision.

0 1 2 60 (100) (40) 3

(000s)

60 60

60 60

NPV = $7,547.

If the cost to repeat S in two years rises to $105,000, which is best? (000s) 0 1 2 3 4

Project S: (100) 60

60 (105) (45)

60

60

Consider another project with a 3-year life. If terminated prior to Year 3, the machinery will have positive salvage value. Year 0 1 2 3 CF ($5,000) 2,100 2,000 1,750 Salvage Value $5,000 3,100 2,000 0

1. No termination

0 (5)

2 2 4

3 1.75

Assuming a 10% cost of capital, what is the projects optimal, or economic life?

Conclusions The project is acceptable only if operated for 2 years. A projects engineering life does not always equal its economic life.

Finance theory says to accept all positive NPV projects. Two problems can occur when there is not enough internally generated cash to fund all positive NPV projects:

Externally raised capital can have large flotation costs, which increase the cost of capital. Investors often perceive large capital budgets as being risky, which drives up the cost of capital.

(More...)

If external funds will be raised, then the NPV of all projects should be estimated using this higher marginal cost of capital.

Capital Rationing

Capital rationing occurs when a company chooses not to fund all positive NPV projects. The company typically sets an upper limit on the total amount of capital expenditures that it will make in the upcoming year.

(More...)

Reason: Companies want to avoid the direct costs (i.e., flotation costs) and the indirect costs of issuing new capital. Solution: Increase the cost of capital by enough to reflect all of these costs, and then accept all projects that still have a positive NPV with the higher cost of capital.

(More...)

Reason: Companies dont have enough managerial, marketing, or engineering staff to implement all positive NPV projects. Solution: Use linear programming to maximize NPV subject to not exceeding the constraints on staffing.

(More...)

Reason: Companies believe that the projects managers forecast unreasonably high cash flow estimates, so companies filter out the worst projects by limiting the total amount of projects that can be accepted. Solution: Implement a post-audit process and tie the managers compensation to the subsequent performance of the project.

- Test Bank - Chapter14 Capital BudgetingUploaded byAiko E. Lara
- Summary of Capital Budgeting Techniques GitmanUploaded byHarold Dela Fuente
- Capital Budgeting and Cash Flow ProjectionUploaded bynira_110
- Acca TipsUploaded byanon-397441
- Heritage Doll Company Project EvaluationUploaded bySabyasachi Sahu
- Engineering Economics Semester TestUploaded byWesley Botha
- ch12 mgt advisoryUploaded byHoney Grace Abasola
- Project Mang Project.Uploaded bymonjurshajib
- NPV,IRR,ROIUploaded bySunny Raina
- Capital BudgetingUploaded byashura08
- ch12.docUploaded byJoshua Gibson
- ch12Uploaded byDarlene Jewel Ramos
- 4.Unit-4 Capital BudgetingUploaded byGaganGabriel
- MGT333Uploaded bynawabrp
- NPV and IRRUploaded bysaadhashmi97
- Capital Budgeting in the National Iranian Petrochemical Company Using the Markowitz ModelUploaded byTI Journals Publishing
- Capital BudgetingUploaded byShishir Agarwal
- Syllabus ICMAUploaded byQadir
- 1. Capital Budgeting PracticesUploaded byridha baron
- chp5Uploaded bydana
- Financial management notes narainUploaded bykrishanptfms
- Cma Content Sp Outln p2 2015Uploaded byShameem Jazir
- npv_irr project ubdate.xlsUploaded bymuhammad nouman
- chaithanya (1).pptUploaded bychaitanya
- finance notes.docxUploaded byHariharan Selvaraju
- Capital Budgeting (2)Uploaded byAbhimanyu Arjun
- Accounting Course OutlineUploaded byatif
- fm3_chapter01Uploaded bySana Naveed Fawad
- FM CoutlineUploaded byRajkumar
- If NotesUploaded byTu Shirota

- A Project Report on Production Expansion of Vitrified Tiles of MCLUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- All Companies Old Logo Part-2Uploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Customer Awareness Level in Market for HDFC Standard Life Insurance Corporation in Dharwad CityUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Comparative Analysis of the New Indian Express Times of India and the Hindu in Hubli CityUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Identifying Car Preference and Buying Behaviour of the Car OwnersUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Causes for Absenteeism in b.d.k. Engineering Industry Ltd. HubliUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Survey on Customer Satisfaction of Philips LightingsUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on to Find Outstanding Terms and Conditions of Different Companies Who Issue Unit Linked Policies and Market Potential for Unit Linked PoliciesUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Creating Brand Awareness Through AdvertisementsUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Business Intelligence And It’s Use In Decision Making” At TARANG SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY LTD, BangaloreUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Customer Satisfaction Level at Kirloskar LtdUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Consumer Attitude Towards Branded Accessories With Specific Reference to Cars From Maruti SuzukiUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Analysis of Stock Price Movement at ANAGRAM STOCK BROKING LTDUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Competition Analysis & Purchase Readiness for ViewWiseUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Competition Analysis & Purchase Readiness for eHRISUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Comparative Study of Salary Accounts of Various Banks at Icici BankUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Brand Positioning of Big BazaarUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Ratio Analysis at Patel Shanti Steel Private Ltd, RAICHURUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Comparative Study of Insurance Plans of Various CompaniesUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Comparative Analysis of the New Indian Express, Times of IndiaUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Capital Budgeting at Godavari Sugar Mills LtdUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Analysis on Market Potential of Special Savings Account at Icici BankUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on a Study on Impact of Iso Procedures on Quality Control at SisUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Evaluation of Distribution Channels in the Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Boils LtdUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Brand Awareness Level of Keshawa Cement BagalkotUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on a STUDY of EQUITY on CAPITAL MARKETS at Indian Infoline BengloreUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Procedural Study &Market Share Determination on Maruti Finance” at ICICI BankUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Brand Preferences of Mango Soft Drinks Among the Consumers of Hubli & DharwadUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Pre and Post Acquisition Activities Related to Various Avenues of Marketing Aspects at VodafoneUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)
- A Project Report on Performance Comparision of HDFC Mutual Fund Equity SchemesUploaded byBabasab Patil (Karrisatte)

- Capital Budgeting and TechniquesUploaded byAmod Garg
- IRR and NPV.pptUploaded byRudini
- MbaUploaded bycmramar
- Anshul Mangal Kribhco A 1802010147 MBA-IBUploaded byAnshul Mangal
- Exam 1Uploaded byDeji Lipede
- Capital Budgeting ProcessUploaded byAjmal Salam
- Time Table- Pre PhD Syllabus & Model QPs (1)Uploaded byKishore Babu Gullapalli
- Capital ExpenditureUploaded byRoshan Poudel
- Project AppraisalUploaded byShujaatAli
- 63375_1Uploaded bymusicshiva
- R21_Capital_Budgeting_Q_Bank.pdfUploaded byZidane Khan
- capital budgeting project.docUploaded byKeleti Santhosh
- International Finance W2013Uploaded byBahrom Maksudov
- NPV modelUploaded byRachita Jolly
- Cap BudgetUploaded byAccounting Guy
- ALL TOGETHER.pdfUploaded byBiniyam ALem
- MS1-Final Exams for StudentsUploaded byNikki Estores
- SM-1.pdfUploaded byVinay Prakash
- Financial Management HAMEC02Uploaded byPrn Cebu
- Chapter 13 SolutionsUploaded byStephen Ayala
- FormulasUploaded bykasimgenel
- chap10Uploaded byMaricar Salvador Pena
- Greenworld Case SOLUTIONUploaded byMahamIbrahim
- Multinational Business Finance 12th Edition Slides Chapter 19Uploaded byAlli Tobba
- International Capital Budgeting SimulationUploaded byChan John
- Capital Budgeting Practice QUploaded byWakas Khalid
- Tiong, Gilbert Charles -Decision MakingUploaded byGilbert Tiong
- ONAL Time Value of Money and Capital BudgetingUploaded bySUNMIN PARK
- Capital BudgetingUploaded byOmprakash Rapolu
- BBM_333_-_FMUploaded byDeep Ray