A SURVEY ON

TEAM MANAGEMENT
PREPARED BY: SHRUT ADANI - HRM:A01 DALIAH RODRIGUES - HRM A:08 KHUSHBU SANGHAVI-HRM:A26

 Dependent Variable: Team Management/Responses Independent variable : - Gender - Age - Work Experience - Designation Sector : Information Technology Companies : Wipro, L&T, Infosys, Syntel, P & B Planet Company Scoring: Option
Always Usually Sometimes Seldom Never

Score Assigned
5 4 3 2 1
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

Graphical Presentation of: 1. Age & Designation 2. Work Experience & Designation 3. Response on Team Management V/S - Age - Gender - Work Experience - Designation

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

Comparison of Respondents on the basis of Gender

Male Female

77.00% 23.00%

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

Dependent Variable Data

Categories
Good Team Management Fair Team Management Poor Team Management

Class
20-46 47-73 74-100

Frequency
0 21 40

%
0 34.42 65.57

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

Age & Designation

Age (years) Engineer 20-25 26-30 >30 Group Leader Designation Senior Developer 4 8 1 Technician Trainee Total

20 9 0

1 4 3

3 2 0

6 0 0

34 23 4

35 30 25 >30 26-30 20-25

Majority of respondents :Engineers within the age group of 20-25 years i.e. 33% Trainees : < 25 years

Age

20 15 10 5 0 Engineer Group Leader Senior Technician Developer Trainee

Designation
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 6

Age

20-25 26-30 >30 Total

Designation Group Senior Engineer Leader Developer Technician 33% 2% 7% 5% 15% 6% 13% 3% 0 5% 2% 0 48% 13% 21% 8%

Trainee Total % 10% 57% 0 37% 0 7% 10% 100

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

Work Experience & Designation

Work Experience (years) <1 3 3-5 5-7 7-9 >10 Total Designation Engineer 7 13 8 1 0 0 29 Group Leader 0 1 1 5 0 1 8 Senior Developer 0 1 8 3 1 0 13 Technician 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 Trainee 3 3 0 0 0 0 6 Total 10 22 18 9 1 1 61

Work experience

14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0

>1

1 to 3

3 to 5

5 to 7

8 to 10

>10

Engineers with 1-3 years work experience: 25% response to good team management. Group Leaders & Senior Developers with 3-7 years work experience: 5% response to team management.
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

Designation

Designation Group Senior Engineer Leader Developer Technician less than 1year 11% 0 0 0 1-3years 21% 2% 1% 7% 3-5years 13% 1% 13% 2% 5-8years 2% 8% 5% 0 8-10years 0 0 2% 0 more than 10years 0 2% 0 0 Total 48% 13% 21% 9%

Work experience

Trainee 5% 5% 0 0 0 0 10%

% 16% 36% 30% 15% 2% 1% 100

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

Team Management & Gender

Categories Class Male Poor Team Management Fair Team management Good Team Management 20-46 47-73 74-100 Total 0 15 32 47 Gender Female 0 6 8 14 Total 0 21 40 61

35

20-46

47-73

74-100

Team Management

30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Male Female

Male team members are good managers. Females are fair team mangers because of less ratio.

Gender

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

10

Categories

Class Male %

Gender Female % 0 10 13 23 Total % 0 34 66 100

Poor Team Managers Fair Team Managers

20-46 0 47-73 25 52 77

Good Team Managers 74-100 Total

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

11

Team Management & Age

Categories Class 20-25 Poor Team Management Fair Team management Good Team Management 20-46 47-73 74-100 Total 0 17 17 34 26-30 0 3 20 23 Age (years) >30 0 1 3 4 Total 0 21 40 61

Team Management

40 20 0 20-25years 26-30 years

20-25 years (age): 30% response to fair team management 26-30 years(age):35% response to good team management. >30years(age): poor team management.

Age

>30 years

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

12

Categories Poor Team Managers Fair Team Managers Good Team Managers

Class 20-46 47-73 74-100 Total

Age 20-25years 26-30 years 0% 0% 28 % 5% 28 % 33 % 56 % 38 %

Total 0 34 % 66 % 100 %

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

13

Team Management & Work Experience

Categories Class <1 Poor Team Management Fair Team management Good Team Management 20-46 0 47-73 6 74-100 4 Total 10 13 22 14 18 8 9 0 1 1 1 40 61 9 4 1 1 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-3 Work Experience (years) 3-5 5-7 7-9 >10 Total

Team Management

15 10 5 0

Poor Team Managers 20-46 Fair Team Managers 47-73 Good Team Managers 74-100

3-5 years work experience: 25% response to good team management. >5 years work experience: fair team management.

Work Experience
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 14

Categories Poor Team Managers Fair Team Managers Good Team Managers

Class 20-46

Work Experience <1year 1-3years 5-7years 7-9years >10years Total 0% 0% 15 % 21 % 36 % 0 2% 13 % 15 % 0 2% 0 2% 0 0 2% 2% 0 34 % 66 % 100

47-73 10 % 74-100 Total 7% 16 %

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

15

Team Management & Designation

Categories Class Engineer Poor Team Management Fair Team management Good Team Management 20-46 0 47-73 6 74-100 23 Total 29 7 8 7 13 3 0 40 61 5 6 Good Team Managers 74-100 Fair Team Managers 47-73 Poor Team Managers 20-46 1 6 2 6 21 0 0 0 0 0 Group Leader Designation Senior Developer Technician Trainee Total

Team Management

30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Engineers: 40% response on good team management. Technicians: 3% response on good team management.

Designation

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

16

Categories

Class

Designation Group Leader

Engineer Poor Team Managers 20-46 0 Fair Team Managers 47-73 10 % Good Team Managers 74-100 38 % Total 48 %

Technician Trainee

Total

2%

3%

10 %

34 %

11 % 13 %

5% 8%

0 10 %

66 % 100

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

17

TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS
y y y

A) Chi Square (G2)= Categorical Data B) Correlation (r) = Continuous Data C) Average Responses V/S Performance on Team Management D) Case Study
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 18

Chi Square

2) (G (G

1. Team Management Performance & Gender:

Categories Fair Team management Good Team Management Class Male 47-73 15 74-100 32 Total 47 8 14 40 61 6 21 Gender Female Total

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

19

Null Hypothesis: There is no association between Team Management Performance & Gender

G2 cal = 0.58 y G2 tab = 3.841

y y

Conclusion: G2 cal (0.58) < G2 tab (3.841) . Therefore, Hypothesis is accepted.

Interpretation: - Gender has no association with Performance of Team - Young professionals have ample of knowledge of latest technology and so gender does not affect a performance of a team. - Subsequently, in a good team mgmt there are senior professionals, male or female, dont have knowledge of new latest technology but still they have that much ability to handle the whole team as a one.
y
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 20

2.Team Management Performance & Age:

Categories

Class 20-25

Age (years) 26-30 >30 Total

Fair Team management Good Team Management

47-73 17 74-100 17 Total 34 20 23 3 4 40 61 3 1 21

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

21

Null Hypothesis: There is no association between Team Management Performance & Age

G2 cal = 8.4641 y G2 tab = 5.991

y y

Conclusion : G2 cal (8.4641) > G2 tab (5.991).Therefore Hypothesis is rejected

Interpretation: - Age of the Team members affects the performance of team. - Between the ages of 20-25 years normally a person is graduated and they seldom get chance to take decisions and are sometimes unable to tackle various situations which senior employees can handle easily from their past experience. - Moreover as and when the age increases the knowledge and qualification comes up to mark which increases the level of a performance of a team.
y
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

22

3.Team Management Performance & Work Experience:

Categories Class <1 Fair Team management Good Team Management 47-73 6 74-100 4 Total 10 22 18 9 1 1 61 13 14 8 0 1 40 9 4 1 1 0 21 1-3 Work Experience (years) 3-5 5-7 7-9 >10 Total

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

23

Null Hypothesis: There is no association of Work Experience on Team Management Performance.

G2 cal = 7.86 y G2 tab =9.48

y y

Conclusion :G2 cal (7.86)< G2 tab (9.48). Therefore hypothesis is accepted

Interpretation: - There is no association of Work Experience on Team Management Performance. - The matter which should be considered is whether the employee is capable to bring the team mgmt performance to another high level or not. - Sometimes a fresher becomes a reason for a good team mgmt performance which another employee of more experienced is never been able to bring.
y
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 24

4.Team Management Performance & Designation:

Categories Class Designation

Engineer

Group Leader

Senior Developer

Technician

Trainee

Total

Fair Team management

47-73 6 1 6 2 6 21

Good Team Management

74-100 23 Total 29 8 13 5 6 61 7 7 3 0 40

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

25

Null Hypothesis: There is no association between Team Management Performance & Designation.

G2 cal = 23.91 y G2 tab = 9.488

y y

Conclusion :G2 cal (23.91) > G2 tab (9.488). Therefore hypothesis is Rejected

Interpretation: - Performance of team management is affected by designation of its members - Senior professionals are capable enough to boost the morale of his juniors and the competition scenario of the current corporate world has made the statement true that yes the performance of a team mgmt is affected by designation. - Whatever the team leader says has to be followed majority of the times, so if the performance is good or bad, ability of team leader is only highlighted.
y
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 26

Correlation (r)
1.Work Experience of leader and Quick Decision making:
y y y y -

Null Hypothesis: Quick decision making (V1) has no relationship with the work experience of the leader(V2). r Value: 0.1742 Conclusion: Value(r) is <0.5 Null hypothesis is accepted. Interpretation: There is no significant relation between the V1 (Quick decision making) & V2 (Work experience of the leader). It does not matter whether the team leader has experience or not unless and until he is good enough to make quickly and good worthy decisions for his team.
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 27

2.Experienced Leader and Skilled Team Leader

y

Null Hypothesis: There is no relation between Experience of the leader and skill of team leader. r Value: 0.1929 Conclusion: Value(r) is <0.5 Null hypothesis is accepted.

y y y

Interpretation: - The two variables are not related to each other i.e.it is not necessary for an experienced leader to be a skilled team leader.
-

Experience and skills are both independent variables which if both put together can create wonders. For e.g. Mr. Dhirubhai Ambani had an experienced vision to open RIL which would have not been fulfilled without his skilled and efficient work team. PERFORMANCE OF TEAM
MANAGEMENT 28

3.Proper Planning and Stress

y

Null Hypotheses: There is no relationship between proper planning and stress. r value: -0.055 Conclusion: Value(r) is <0.5 and -ve accepted. Null hypothesis is

y y

Interpretation: - There is no relationship of proper planning on stress. There is a poor relation between the two variable i.e. proper planning and stress. - If you have done proper planning to carry out series of work then there are less chances of failure but people with attitude of carrying stress will have it although there is no need of it.
y
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 29

4.Monitor Work and Praise the Team

y

Null Hypothesis: There is no relation between Monitoring work (V1) and praising (V2) the team members. r Value: 0.0652 Conclusion: Value(r) is <0.5 Interpretation: Null hypothesis is accepted.

y y y

V1 (Monitoring work ) & V2 (Praising the team members) has no relation. - Monitoring work just relates to supervising the work done, but praising the team relates to a very positive aspect of Team Mgmt performance. - Praising the team can only lead to motivation.
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 30

5.Size of the Team and Duration of the Project.

y

Null Hypothesis: There is no relation between size of the team (V1) and duration of the project (V2). r Value: 0.384
Conclusion: Value(r) is <0.5 Null hypothesis is accepted.

y
y

Interpretation: - There is no relation between VI & V2 i.e. Size of the team and duration of the project. - Whether a team is of 2 member or 10 members is not a matter to consider. But if a team with a few efficiency members completes the work in less time than a team with more inefficient members, then the one with fewer members is more preferable.
y
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 31

6.Designation and Communication

y

Null Hypotheses: There is no relation between designation and communication. r Value: -0.075 Conclusion: Value(r) is <0.5 and -ve is accepted. Null hypothesis

y y

Interpretation: - There is no relation between the two variables i.e. designation and communication. - So no matter whatever the designation is, a good team management requires communication among all employees. PERFORMANCE OF TEAM
y
MANAGEMENT 32

7.Appreciation and Stress Reduction

y

Null Hypothesis: There is no relationship between Appreciation and stress reduction. r Value: 0.285 Conclusion: Value(r) is <0.5 Null hypothesis is accepted.

y y y -

Interpretation: Appreciation and Stress reduction are not related to each other. If work is not completed on time, stress will arise, no matter the employee is appreciated or not. Appreciation just leads to motivation, not necessary that it will lead to stress reduction. Stress can be considered a quality of personalityTEAM PERFORMANCE OF also.
MANAGEMENT 33

8.Work Independently and Reduced Stress

y

Null Hypotheses: Working independently (V1) has no relationship on stress reduction(V2). r Value: 0.3597 Conclusion: Value(r) is <0.5 Interpretation: V1 i.e. working independently has no relationship on V2 i.e. stress reduction. In tasks like designing or developing a software, better O/P can be obtained if allowed to work independently, but when it comes to decision making, coordinating work, etc. a collective effort of team members is required. Stress is considered to take place in any of the above situations when work is not completed on time, when there is overload etc, So stress has no effect whether an employee is allowed to work independently or not. Null hypothesis is accepted.

y -

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

34

Average Responses V/S Performance on Team Management

y

The average score for the question Good communication is necessary to avoid dispute among members, was observed as the highest scored item (4.66) amongst all. The average score for the question Team leaders need to understand the strength of the team members before assigning the task was observed as the 2nd highest scored item(4.47) amongst all.

Meaning out of all the 20 questions asked these 2 questions was considered as most important by majority of the respondents and were responded as always. y So, for a better O/P, it is necessary to understand the strength of team members and a proper communication within the team and with other coordinates is also necessary. PERFORMANCE OF TEAM
y
MANAGEMENT 35

The average score for the question If you are highly skilled team leader, it does not matter who is in your team, was observed as the least scored item (2.91) amongst all. The average score for the question Designation of the members of the team creates conflicts, was observed as the 2nd least scored item (3.06) amongst all.

Meaning out of all the 20 questions asked these 2 questions were given the minimum weightage by majority of the respondents and were responded as never. y Thus, a good performance of the team depends on overall contribution of all team members irrespective of Team Leaders Skills and Designation of the members.
y
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 36

2.05 2 1.95

Case Study Response:

Response

1.9

1.85 1.8 1.75

Employers are unethical

Firm is breaking the contract

Allow him to Adjust to be a Provide work Team Player Training to be independently a Team Player for better O/P
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

37

CONCLUSION
Fair Team Management: Age : 20-25years Work Experience : 1-3 years Designation : Engineers and Senior Developers : - In age and work experience : Fair Management -> Good Management - Senior Developers : Show fair Management instead of Good Management
Recommendations

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT

38

Good Team Management: Age : 26-30years Work Experience : 3-5years Designation : Engineers : - In Team Management : <1yr or >5yrs of work experience -Work Independently - Young Age : Healthy competition : Enthusiastic : Efficient : Technological changes - Seniors : in Boredom -> O/P
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 39

Recommendations

Conclusion:
y y y

Gender & Work Experience has no effect on Team Management Performance. Age & Designation play a vital role on Team Management Performance. Team members should have a proper flow of communication and they should be allowed to work independently. It is the duty of the Team Leader to understand the strength of the team and then assign the work. Skill of a Team leader & Designation does not affect performance of the Team
PERFORMANCE OF TEAM MANAGEMENT 40