Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Wong Renhao Graham Choo Heng Hailee Kenny Yeo Roshni Rawla Hans Yamin
It seems to be an inevitable human reaction to search for a cause for everything, to find something responsible (be it to be blamed on or to be used as an excuse) for any happenings. Throughout the entire history of humanity, for as long as humans have roamed this earth, violence has been a part of our daily activities. It has been prevalent since the days media had not even existed, and yet today the mass media is being blamed for promoting violence. As we walk into an era where humans have become (and are still becoming) more and more dependent on the mass media, it seems to have become a consensus among people that the mass media indeed carries an inalienable impact on violence in our society today. In this paper, we would uncover more about the relationship between media and violence, and discover the real truth behind it.
Lionel Tate
As many as 1/3 of convicted male felonies admit to copycatting crimes (Centerwall, 1992)
Are the murder and mayhem on television really to blame for the increased violence in society?
Statistics
The presence of violent content on television in ownership of television sets from 1/10
homes having 1 (1950) to 1/10 homes NOT having 1 (1960) The average child spends >3 hrs each day in front of the tube (Minow, 1996) According to the APA, the typical child will view >8,000 murders and over 100,000 acts of TV violence in the course of a lifetime
Statistics
BUT these studies have nothing to say about how the violence may be affecting people Content effect Humans react differently to media messages
Research Studies
Research Studies
Albert Banduras social learning theory
Emphasized the importance of rewards and punishments
2 groups of children watched 2 different videos
Video 1: The leading characters acted aggressively and received rewards for his actions Video 2: The leading characters acted aggressively and received punishment for his actions The children played in the room and their actions were monitored
2 findings:
Children who saw aggressive behavior rewarded were more likely to imitate the aggression The effects emerged most strongly for boys (predisposition to behave more aggressively)
Research Studies
BUT not every child who saw the aggression being rewarded behaved aggressively after the video
Research Studies
Leonard Eron and Rowell Huesmanns long term studies
Studied over 800 children under the age of 10, during the 1960s
Tendency for children who watched higher levels of TV violence to have higher scores on the ratings of aggressive behavior
Research Studies
BUT there is no way to tell which came first the TV viewing or the aggressive behavior?
Research Studies
Leonard Eron and Rowell Huesmanns long term studies
Longitudinal investigation (2003) that followed children into adulthood
Boys and girls in the upper 20% on TV viewing were significantly higher on the measures of adult aggression
Research Studies
BUT not every child who watched large amounts of TV violence ended up getting involved in crimes Was childhood viewing a causal factor in the later commission of crimes? Research potentially links media violence with real-life violence
Research Studies
Brandon Centerwalls research
in U.S. crime statistics from 3 homicides per 100,000 people (1945 Just before TV emerged) to 6 (1974) Claimed that TV was the major culprit in the rise of homicides
Research Studies
Brandon Centerwalls research
But the homicide rate in South Africa dropped by 7% from 1945 1974
As a result of a ban on TV When the ban was lifted in 1974, the murder rate i by 56% by 1983
Research Studies
Seymour Feshbachs Catharsis Hypothesis
Viewing TV violence could be therapeutic for a person filled with anger Catharsis To cleanse or purge; to get rid of Media violence was actually a +ve thing
Research Studies
Seymour Feshbachs Catharsis Hypothesis
The detention facility for boys experiment
Nonviolent TV diet vs. violent TV diet for several weeks The boys who had watched TV violence behaved less aggressively BUT we should be slow to arrive at definitive conclusions from any single study Only demonstrated that people will act more violently if they cant watch their favorite TV programs than if they can watch them
Research Studies
Leonard Berkowitz and associates priming analysis
Angry people and media violence make for volatile mix Offered the explanation of the facilitating / priming effect of media violence
Understood in terms of association Process whereby one thing you think about reminds you of other thins in your mind that you associate with the first thing
Research Studies
Leonard Berkowitz and associates priming analysis
3 findings:
1. Violence can prime thoughts that are related to hostility 2. Media violence might prime thoughts that lead one to believe that aggressive behavior might be warranted in certain situations and might bring about certain benefits 3. Media violence might prime action tendencies that cause people to be more inclined to act violently
Desensitization
Desensitization
making us numb to violence in real life so that we dont react to it as we should if we had never seen it on the screen
Evidence
Anecdotal Research
Anecdotal Evidence
sequels have more violence than previous movie Increased violence to give viewers who have seen the previous movie heightened emotional charge There is no easy way to go backwards Ever-increasing level of violence
Funny Violence
From the concept of desensitization Viewers experience desensitization particularly when the violence is in a comical context Effects of funny violence > Effects of regular violence?
Funny Violence
Family Guy:
A Case Study
Family Guy
9 clips from Best of compilation videos, 1 standalone clip Played in ascending order of level of (funny) violence
Violence
Grand Theft Auto Counter-Strike Evil Dead
Banned
Because they are too violent In 2000, Singapore banned a PC game, Half-Life Parents supported the act because they see these sort of game as a bad influence. (Marcus Yam, 2000)
Columbine Massacre
Littleton, Colorado, 1999 Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold Fans of Doom Playing violent games = Aggressive behavior?
Professional Opinions
Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, 2000s Author of a book about killing The urge to kill is unnatural Convinced that violent gaming is the cause AVIDS (acquired violence immune deficiency
syndrome)
Coincidently
50 years ago, Dr. Frederic Wertham, a psychiatrist wrote a book on harmful effects of comics Very much like Grossman Perhaps in the 1950s, comics were the most popular entertainment Thus the only bad influence.
Researchers: Nicola Schutte and colleagues (1988) Targets: Children 5-7 years old Karateka (violent) vs. Jungle Hunt (nonviolent) Result: Kids who played Karateka showed aggressive behavior towards other kids. Jungle Hunt kids were more gentle at play.
Case 1
Shylo Kujawski caught stealing a car History of convictions Hardcore GTA fan (tattoo on the back)
(Gamespot, 2006)
Case 2
William and Joshua Buckner Shot at cars with .22 caliber rifle They told the police who arrested them that they were bored, and decided to mimic their favorite videogame, Grand Theft Auto Blame Game (Other issues to consider) Access to firearms Massive sales around the world Or perhaps the answer to the perennial problem of delinquent teenagers dropping bricks from motorway and railway bridges is to sue the creators of Tetris.
(The Register, 2003)
Case 3
Devin Moore, 18 Killed 2 police-men and 1 dispatcher Sentenced to death by lethal injection in 2005 Life is a videogame. Everybodys got to die sometime.
Again, an isolated case in the US In the 50s, comic books were blamed for juvenile delinquency (scapegoatism) Retailers selling games to minors. David Walsh, child psychologist, believes that teenage brains are wired differently.
In a crowded marketplace, where everyone is trying to be heard and where there's an amazing number of choices, the loudest, coarsest, most shocking voice does tend to be the one that at least grabs your attention for a moment.(Seabrook, J.,2001)
Interesting Facts
RoboCop featured 32 bodies RoboCop 2 featured 81! Similarly, Die Hard 2= 264 deaths Rambo 3= 106 deaths Total Recall= 74 deaths!
Action Sells
Action Movies; Dont require complex plots or characters Rely on fights, killings, special effects and explosions to hold their audiences Theyre simple and universally understood Short-on-dialogue, high-on-testosterone" makes their dubbing or translation relatively inexpensive
Movie Ratings
G- General Audiences PG- Parental Guidance R- Restricted A movie is strongly violent if it has a rating of 8 or above (Hannibal), and mildly violent if it has a rating of 5 to 7 (Spider-Man).
WARNINGS
VIOLENT KILLING SCENES IN THIS MOVIE MAY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY CONTRIBUTE TO THE INSIDENCE OF VIOLENCE. VIEWER DISRETION IS ADVISED.
VIDEO URL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL0SI LzGs4g
Music
Music is another form of media people like to point finger on, with regard to the effects of media violence Previously, the accusation mainly points mostly to underground extreme music, e.g. Hardcore, Punk, Metal However, researchers and scientists were not able to find any solid evidence on this. (Columbine incident, remember?) As of recently, we can also see Hip-hop (i.e. Gangsta Rap) becoming the new scapegoat
Music
It seems that the blame on Music is no longer just on the audio itself, but rather, music videos A lot of researchers look into music videos and what kind of impacts it brings about on youths today, e.g. the relationship between sexually violent rock music videos and males acceptance of violence against women [JS Lawrence, DJ Joyner. 1991] However, instead of proving the effect of music, such studies actually adds on to the fact that music itself do not really carry any harmful effects towards listeners, and that visual-oriented media are the ones really affecting people as far as violent behaviors are concerned
Conclusion
We have looked into the possible impacts of violent contents in different forms of media on people, be it TV, Music, Movies, Games, etc. Each affects people differently in different degrees, and different individuals react to it differently as well It seems that it may really affect people in certain ways, but cases discussed are still pretty much the minority, or idiosyncratic Is media really that big an influence where violence is concerned? people tend to point fingers on media alone when something happens, undermining the impact of long years of education we have had, as well as natural instinct and instilled integrity/morality that people may possess There has got to be a better way in explaining violent behaviors in people, perhaps it is time to look away from the media and reassess the whole thing with a fresh point of view