Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
EXISTENCE
Logic and Grammar (from Brian Garrett)
Existential Claims
Existential Claims
Existential Claims
Existential Claim
Singular Predications
Ex.
Plural Predications
Ex.
Men exist
VS
is a existential quantifier
Historically both views have had their defenders Property View Meinong : some objects possess the property of existence, while other objects lack the property of existence. Quantity View Hume: the idea of existence is nothing different from the idea of any object.
Kant:
By whatever and however many predicates we may think of a thing even if we completely determine it we do not make the least addition to the thing when we further declare that this thing is.
The rule of Existential Generalization [a/Ex(x)] Ex(x is handsome): logically valid Ex(x does not exist): contains a contradiction
-Ex(x = Santa Claus), where the negation appears at the front. But this is no solution. By (EG), from -Ex(x = Santa Claus)
we can infer the contradiction Ey-Ex(x = y). The best move for a defender of the quantifier view may be to eliminate names altogether
By (EG) from ~(Ea) we may infer x~(Ex), and from (~E)a we may infer x(~Ex). Both conclusions are contradictions they assert that there exists something which does not exist.
Non-existent objects
To exist is to have a property that only some of the things we refer to have those that exist as opposed to those that are merely fictional. A non-existent objects lack the property of existence and, on views that embrace negative properties, possess the property of nonexistence.
Definite descriptions are meaningful then they must denote objects. If grammatical subjects are featured in true sentences then there is such a subject If objects referred to do not exist but are successfully referred to then there is such an object There are times when we regard fictional objects to hold some truth. Their truth can only be made