Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Viral Hepatitis
A
Source of virus
feces
E
feces
blood/ blood/ blood/ blood-derived blood-derived blood-derived body fluids body fluids body fluids percutaneous percutaneous percutaneous permucosal permucosal permucosal
Route of transmission
fecal-oral
fecal-oral
Chronicity
Prevention
no
yes
yes
yes
no
pre/postpre/postblood donor pre/postensure safe exposure exposure screening; exposure drinking immunization immunization risk behavior immunization; water modification risk behavior modification
HBsAg Prevalence
8% - High 2-7% - Intermediate <2% - Low
Hepatitis B Vaccines
recombinant
GMT mIU/ml
6074
3211 11 2 722
in non-responders
Vertical
Epidemiology: Age dependent 350M chronically infected 1M cases of death per year 5-10% of liver transplant
D B, C D
A, D, E
F
A, B, C, D
Arauz-Ruiz P, et al. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:2059-2073. Bell SJ, et al. J Clin Virol. 2005;32:122-127. Chu CJ, et al. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:444-451. Kidd-Ljunggren K, et al. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:1267-1280. Keeffe EB, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:87-106.
Recovery
<5 yrs, 10-70% >5 yrs, 90-98%
Death
Death 15%-25%
Chronic Hepatitis B
Acute
HBeAg HBV DNA Chronic anti-HBe HBsAg Total antiHBc
IgM anti-HBc
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36
52
Years
+ + -
- +
Anti-HBc IgM -
Other causes of chronic liver disease should be systematically looked for including coinfection with HDV, HCV and/or HIV. Co-morbidities, including alcoholic, autoimmune, metabolic liver disease with steatosis or steato-hepatitis should be assessed (A1).
HBeAg Status
Inactive CHB
80
60 HBeAg-/HBV DNA+
40 20
0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (years) HBeAg+ persistence
Hepatitis D Virus
d antigen HBsAg
RNA
Cop/ml
5.6
(n=3774 pts.)
Iloeje UH et al, Gastroenterology 2006;130:678-86
10.7
8 6 4 2 0
<0.01 P <0.001
2.7 1
<300 (LOQ)
1
300 <1 x 104 1 x 104 <1 x 105
1 x 106
(Reference)
111
1,152
HBV therapy
Goal of therapy
HBV infection cant be completely eradicated due to persistence of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in the nucleus of infected hepatocytes. To improve quality of life & survival by preventing progression to cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, HCC & death.
Antigenpresenting cell
HBV antigens
HBV
Infected Hepatocyte
HBV DNA HBV RNA HBV peptides HBsAg HBV cores
CD8+ T cell
T cell
MHC class I
Correlation between change in HBV DNA and HAI with Lam treatment (r=0.96; P<3x10-6)
4 2
0 0
Lamivudine for patients with chronic HBV & advanced liver disease
Increase in Child-Pugh Score (% of patients)
Placebo Lamivudine
Distribution of Ishak fibrosis scores at phase III baseline, after 48 weeks of entecavir treatment, and at the time of the long-term biopsy
(median: 6 years entecavir treatment [range 37 years]) among histologically evaluable patients in the Long-Term Histology Cohort (N=57).
60
50
Number of patients
30
4 3 2 1 0
20
10
Missing
Reduction in fibrosis following long-term entecavir therapy in a 60 yo, HBeAg-negative, Caucasian male.
The baseline biopsy shows an Ishak score of 6, indicating cirrhosis, which is unchanged at Week 48, and the Week 268 biopsy shows an Ishak score of 2, indicating minimal fibrosis
268 week
48 week
Baseline
Test
Dot blot
Abbott
Digene Chiron Amplicor Monitor
Liquid hybridisation
RNA-DNA hybrid Branched DNA Quantitative PCR
106 105
104 103 102
End-points of therapy
(1) In HBeAg+ & HBeAgnegative patients, the ideal is sustained HBsAg loss with/out seroconversion to anti-HBs. Associated with a definitive remission of HBV & an improved long-term outcome (A1). (2) In HBeAg+ patients, durable HBe seroconversion is associated with improved prognosis (A1). (3) To reduce HBV DNA as possible, ideally < the lower limit of detection (1015 IU/ml), then lead to: o biochemical remission, o histological improvement o prevention of complications.
HBeAg(+)
90
88 92 80 70 60 50 51 40 39 25 67 60 74
63
30
20 10 0
21
PEG LA AD
ET
Ld
TD
PEG LA AD
ET
Ld
TD
60 50 40 30
49
38 29 24 18 0.5 11 3 0 0.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 4 22
20 10
0
LA
AD
ET
Ld
TD
Analysis of 159 HBeAgpositive patients treated with Lamivudine for median 29 months follow-up 64%
100 80
Patients with ADV 60 Resistance at Week 144 40 (%)
60 40 20 0 32% 8%
200
26%
13%
3 log10 4 log10
20
4%
0
>4 log10
< 3 log
3 - 6 log
> 6 log
HBeAg(+)
90
88 92 80 70 60 50 51 40 39 25 67 60 74
63
30
20 10 0
21
PEG LA AD
ET
Ld
TD
PEG LA AD
ET
Ld
TD
Main respective advantages & disadvantages of PEG- interferon & NUCs in the treatment of CHB
Advantages
PEG-interferon :
NUCs:
Finite duration
Absence of resistance Higher rates of HBe & HBs seroconversion
Disadvant.
LAM
ADV
ETV
LdT
HBeAg-neg CHB
3%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Marcellin et al. NEJM 2004 Lau et al. NEJM 2005 Janssen et al. Lancet 2005 Hoofnagle et al. Hepatology 2007
During treatment, an HBV DNA decrease to < 20,000 IU/ml at 12 weeks: 50% chance of HBe sero- conversion in HBeAg+ 50% chance of sustained response in HBeAgneg.
During treatment, HBeAg decrease at week 24 may predict HBe seroconversion (B2).
Treatment failure
Treatment failure
(1) Primary non-response: Rare with Lam., telbivudine, entecavir or tenofovir. More frequent with adefovir (~20%). A rapid switch to tenofovir or entecavir is recommended (B1). In a compliant patient, identification of resistance mutations can formulate a rescue strategy based on an early change to a more potent drug that is active against the resistant variant (B1).
Treatment failure
(2) Partial virological response: o With all available NUCs. o In lamivudine, adefovir or telbivudine with a partial virological response at week 24:
Change to entecavir or tenofovir Or addition of a more potent drug that does not share cross-resistance:
add tenofovir to lamivudine or telbivudine add entecavir to adefovir (A1).
Ent; 2; 4%
No Viremia; 8; 17%
Adf; 3; 7%
L180M
A181V A184G
S202I
M204I
M204V N236T
M250V
ETV
Entecavir
LdT
Telbivudine
FTC
Emtricitabine
ADV
Adefovir
TD
Tenofovir
Thank You
Rifaat Safadi M.D