Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter-03
Information Visibility
Supply Chain
Part
01
Customer
Server
Customer
Server
Customer
Server
Technology Server
Source: Craig M. Froehle and Aleda V. Roth, New Measurement Scales for Evaluating Perceptions of the Technology-mediated Customer Service Experience, Journal of Operations Management, 22/1 (February 2004), pg. 3
Data is stored and retrieved remotely using radio waves Onboard sensors Product information
The RFID device serves the same purpose as a bar code or a magnetic strip on the back of a credit card or ATM card; it provides a unique identifier for that object.
What is EPC?
The Electronic Product Code (EPC) is an identification scheme for universally identifying physical objects via Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags and other means.
Extremely long barcodes, this greater data capacity affects the business process because it in turn allows a greater degree of unique identification. The Key Difference
UPC contains just enough information to identify the class of a product EPC contains more information to identify the product uniquely It is not necessary for UPC to be universal
EPC
Research says worldwide RFID spending will jump from $300 million in 2004 to $2.8 billion by 2009, and that most will centre on the global supply chain (EPC Global the Source January 2005)
An AMR Research study found early EPC/RFID adopters in the retail and consumer
packaged goods (CPG) industries have lowered their supply chain costs between three and five percent.
Beyond Barcode
268 million companies can each categorize 16 million different products and each product category may contain over 687 billion individual items.
Architecture
How It works.
Types of Tags
Passive
Operational power scavenged from reader radiated power Require no internal power source or maintenance
Semi-passive
Operational power provided by battery
Active
Operational power provided by battery - transmitter built into tag More reliable and efficient in rugged environments
LF
MF
HF
VHF
UF
MICROWAVE
1 MHz
HighFreq .
10 MHz
100 MHz
Ultra High Freq.
1 GHz
Microwave Freq.
10
134 kHz
T1-RFID
13.56 MHz
T1-RFID
ITEM
PACKAGING
TRANSPORT UNIT
UNIT LOAD
CONTAINER
MOVEMENT VEHICLE
Bar Code
Passive RFID
125 kHz & 13.56 MHz 868 MHz EPCglobal ISO 15693 & ISO 14443-3 Gen 2 ISO 18000-6
Active RFID
ISO 18000-7
GPRS
Frequencies of operation
Frequency Range Tag cost Applications
Pet and ranch animal identification Car key locks
3 feet
$1+
High-frequency 3 feet $0.50 13.56 MHz Tags can be read from relatively greater distances
Tags can hold more information
25 feet
$0.50
Microwave: 2.45GHz
100 feet
$25+
Applications of RFID
Applications
Keyless entry EPC Proximity cards Libraries Security device
Bookstores
RFID-privacy legislation
REAL ID Act
Size comparison
(RFID chip, Dime, Rice)
Tracking Inventory
Wireless / Batch Inventory Management Where is it? What is it? What is inside the box?
Material Handling By Destination Where is it going? Where has it been? Should it be here?
Material Handling Aggregate / De-aggregate What have I assembled or disassembled? How many do I have? Do I have enough?
Material Handling Inspecting / Maintaining Has this been repaired? Is this under warrantee? Has this been inspected? Is this complete? What is the assets status or state?
Human Tracking
Animals Tracking
Shops Security
www.Rj12.net
Shopping
RFID Implant
Electronic Passport
Contactless payment
Internet of Things
Civil liberties groups (among others) have become increasingly concerned about the use of RFIDs to track the movements of individuals. For example, passports will soon be required to contain some sort of RFID device to speed border crossings. Scanners placed throughout an airport, for example, could track the location of every passport over time, from the moment you left the parking lot to the moment you got on your plane. There are also concerns about the fact that, even after you leave the store, any RFID devices in the things you buy are still active. This means that a thief could walk past you in the mall and know exactly what you have in your bags, marking you as a potential victim. A thief could even circle your house with an RFID scanner and pull up data on what you have in your house before he robs it. Military hardware and even clothing make use of RFID tags to help track each item through the supply chain. Some analysts are concerned that, if there are particular items associated with high-level officers, roadside bombs could be set to go off when triggered by an RFID scan of cars going by. There was a recent report revealing clandestine tests at a Wal-Mart store where RFID tags were inserted in packages of lipstick, with scanners hidden on nearby shelves. When a customer picked up a lipstick and put it in her cart, the movement of the tag was registered by the scanners, which triggered surveillance cameras. This allowed researchers 750 miles away to watch those consumers as they walked through the store, looking for related items.
"Imagine an Internet of things, where everyday objects, rooms, and machines are connected to one another and to the larger digital world. - Business 2.0
RFID Capabilities
RFID Capabilities
1995
Comprehensiveness
2003
Source: http://www.symbol.com/products/rfid/rfid_next_generation.html
Part
02
Obstacles
Incentive Obstacles Information Processing Obstacles Operational Obstacles Pricing Obstacles Behavioral Obstacles
Managerial Levers
Aligning Goals and Incentives Improving Information Accuracy Improving Operational Performance Designing Pricing Strategies to Stabilize Orders Building Strategic Partnerships and Trust
Behavioral Obstacles
3. These self-interested members decisions may not align with the optimal decisions for the overall performance of the supply chain.
4. Inefficiencies across supply chain lead to decentralization cost
5. Solution: to coordinate the members to act as if they are a centralized supply chain (i.e., one decision-maker makes decisions in behalf of the whole supply chain)
Inventory
inaccurate demand forecasting long variable lead times late deliveries incomplete shipments product changes batch ordering price fluctuations and discounts inflated orders
Integration with selected first tier, and increasingly second tier suppliers
Inefficient logistics
Tier 1 Supplier
Manufacturer
Distributor
Retailer
Customer
High stockouts
Ineffective promotions
Bullwhip effect
Bullwhip effect refers to the phenomenon where orders to the supplier tend to have larger variance than sales to the buyer (i.e., information distortion) and the distortion propagates upstream in an amplified form (i.e., variance amplification).
Time
Time Time
Time
Time
Supplier
Manufacturer
Wholesaler
Retail Store
Consumers
Inaccurate information can cause minor fluctuations in demand for a product to be amplified as one moves further back in the supply chain. Minor fluctuations in retail sales for a product can create excess inventory for distributors, manufacturers, and suppliers.
Order quantity
7,000
Retailers daily orders to distribution center Babies daily demand for diapers
5,000
3,000
Causes
price fluctuation
poor demand forecasting Bullwhip Effect erratic shifts in orders up and down the supply chain
order batching
Order synchronization
Multiple retailers who tend to order around the same time period Manufacturers responding to an MRP system that place raw material orders at the beginning of the month In order to save on shipping or ordering costs, firms order a full pallet or full truck load
Shortage gaming
Effects
Even slight demand uncertainties and variability become magnified if each distinct entity on the chain, makes ordering and inventory decisions with respect to its own interest above those of the chain
Distorted information can lead to tremendous inefficiencies excessive inventories poor customer service lost revenues ineffective shipments missed production schedules.
A common way to solve the bullwhip problem is by sharing information along the supply chain through EDI, extranets, and groupware technologies. For example employing a vendor-managed inventory (VMI) strategy, the vendor monitors inventory levels and when it falls below the threshold for each product this automatically triggers an immediate shipment.
Remedies
Cross-docking. This involves unloading goods arriving from a supplier and immediately loading these
goods onto outbound trucks bound for various retailer locations. This eliminates storage at the retailers inbound warehouse, cuts the lead time, and has been used very successfully by WalMart and Xerox among others.
Delayed differentiation. This involves adding differentiating features to standard products late in the
process. For example, Bennetton decided to make all of their wool sweaters in undyed yarn and then dye the sweaters when they had more accurate demand data. Another term for delayed differentiation is postponement.
Direct shipping. This allows a firm to ship directly to customers rather than through retailers. This
approach eliminates steps in the supply chain and reduces lead time. Reducing one or more steps in the supply chain is known as disintermediation. Companies such as Dell use this approach.
Sharing Information: Retailers may give the supplier frequent access to actual consumer demand data
so that the supplier can make its production plans accordingly.
Vendor Managed inventory: The retailer no longer decides when and how much inventory to order.
Instead, the supplier decides the timing and quantity of shipments to the retailer (e.g. P&G and Wal-Mart)
Smoothing the flow of products: Supplier and the retailers coordinate the timing of orders so that
retailers do not place orders at the same time.
Illustrations
Dealer 1
Car Manufacturer Available = 200
Order = 100
Dealer 2
Order = 200
Knowing the manufacturer policy, customers exaggerate their real needs when they order (game the system). Example:
Need = 120
Need = 180
Order more than needed so that if only 2/3 of the order is filled you still get what you actually need
As a result, customers orders give the supplier little information on a products real demand, a particularly vexing problem for new products
Supplier
Buyer
Customers
The buyer produces D = 10,000 units/year of a product at a constant rate. Each time the buyer places an order for a certain component, the ordering cost is Sb = $100. The buyers inventory holding cost is H = $10/yr and optimal ordering quantity: 2 DS 2(10, 000)(100)
EOQb
b
10
447
The supplier produces an order whenever one is received from the buyer. Each time the seller sets up to produce a batch of components, the production setup cost is Ss = $300. The suppliers total (setup) cost = Ss(D/EOQb) = 300(10,000/447) = 6711 Optimal ordering quantity for the centralized supply chain:
EOQSC
2 D ( Sb S s ) H
$ 11,184
$ 5,589
Suppliers cost (at Q=447) = Ss (D/EOQb) = 300(10,000/447) = $6,711 Buyers cost (at Q=447) = (2 x D x H x Sb) = (2 x 10000 x 10 x 100) = $ 4,472
Suppliers cost (at Q=894) = Ss (D/EOQb) = 300(10,000/894) = $3,356 SC overall cost (at Q=894) = (2 x D x H x (Sb + Ss)) = (2 x 10000 x 10 x 400) = $ 8,944
Buyer's optimal Centralized supply chain's quantity optimal quantity Cost saving Q=447 Q=894 $6,711 $3,356 $3,356 $4,472 $5,589 -$1,116 $11,184 $8,944 $2,239
If buyer orders Q=894, supply chains total cost is reduced But, buyer incurs a higher cost, and will not order Q=894 The SC is NOT coordinated without a compensation for buyer
For any order quantity Q, the buyer always bears a fraction of of the total cost of the supply chain
Supplier promises to pay buyer The buyer promises to pay the supplier = = (1) (buys total holding and setup cost) () (suppliers total setup cost)
Buys optimal quantity = SCs optimal quantity = centralized SCs optimal quantity = 894 There exist a such that buyer and suppliers are both better off than ordering Q = 447
VMI projects
Dillard Department Stores, JCPenney and Wal-Mart Sales increases of 20 to 25% 30% inventory turnover improvements
Type I
Type II
Replenishment only
Type III
Type IV
Type III and IV are more advanced and require further research and development
Quick Response
The supplier receives POS data from retailers, and use this information to synchronize their production and inventory activities.
The retailer prepares individual orders, but the POS data is used by the supplier to improve forecasting and scheduling.