3/17/00 KVJ 1

Bin and Hopper Design

Karl Jacob
The Dow Chemical Company
Solids Processing Lab
jacobkv@dow.com
3/17/00
KVJ 2
The Four Big Questions
What is the appropriate flow mode?
What is the hopper angle?
How large is the outlet for reliable flow?
What type of discharger is required and
what is the discharge rate?
3/17/00
KVJ 3
Hopper Flow Modes
Mass Flow - all the material in the
hopper is in motion, but not necessarily
at the same velocity
Funnel Flow - centrally moving core,
dead or non-moving annular region
Expanded Flow - mass flow cone with
funnel flow above it
3/17/00
KVJ 4
Mass Flow
Typically need 0.75 D to 1D to
enforce mass flow
D
Material in motion
along the walls
Does not imply plug
flow with equal
velocity
3/17/00
KVJ 5
Funnel Flow
Dead or non-
flowing region
3/17/00
KVJ 6
Expanded Flow
Funnel Flow
upper section
Mass Flow
bottom section
3/17/00
KVJ 7
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
3/17/00
KVJ 8
Ratholing/Piping
Stable Annular
Region
3/17/00
KVJ 9
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
3/17/00
KVJ 10
Funnel Flow
-Segregation
-Inadequate Emptying
-Structural Issues
C
o
a
r
s
e

C
o
a
r
s
e

F
i
n
e

3/17/00
KVJ 11
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
3/17/00
KVJ 12
Arching/Doming
Cohesive Arch preventing
material from exiting
hopper
3/17/00
KVJ 13
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
Insufficient Flow
3/17/00
KVJ 14
Insufficient Flow
- Outlet size too small
- Material not sufficiently
permeable to permit dilation in
conical section -> plop-plop
flow
Material needs
to dilate here
Material under
compression in
the cylinder
section
3/17/00
KVJ 15
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
Insufficient Flow
Flushing
3/17/00
KVJ 16
Flushing
Uncontrolled flow from a hopper due to
powder being in an aerated state
- occurs only in fine powders (rough rule
of thumb - Geldart group A and smaller)
- causes --> improper use of aeration
devices, collapse of a rathole
3/17/00
KVJ 17
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
Insufficient Flow
Flushing
Inadequate Emptying

3/17/00
KVJ 18
Inadequate emptying
Usually occurs in funnel flow silos
where the cone angle is insufficient
to allow self draining of the bulk
solid.
Remaining bulk
solid
3/17/00
KVJ 19
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
Insufficient Flow
Flushing
Inadequate Emptying
Mechanical Arching
3/17/00
KVJ 20
Mechanical Arching
Akin to a traffic jam at the outlet of bin
- too many large particle competing for
the small outlet
6 x d
p,large
is the minimum outlet size to
prevent mechanical arching, 8-12 x is
preferred
3/17/00
KVJ 21
Problems with Hoppers
Ratholing/Piping
Funnel Flow
Arching/Doming
Insufficient Flow
Flushing
Inadequate Emptying
Mechanical Arching
Time Consolidation - Caking
3/17/00
KVJ 22
Time Consolidation - Caking
Many powders will tend to cake as a
function of time, humidity, pressure,
temperature
Particularly a problem for funnel flow
silos which are infrequently emptied
completely
3/17/00
KVJ 23
Segregation
Mechanisms
- Momentum or velocity
- Fluidization
- Trajectory
- Air current
- Fines

3/17/00
KVJ 24
What the chances for mass flow?
Cone Angle Cumulative % of
from horizontal hoppers with mass flow
45 0
60 25
70 50
75 70
*data from Ter Borg at Bayer
3/17/00
KVJ 25
Mass Flow (+/-)
+ flow is more consistent
+ reduces effects of radial segregation
+ stress field is more predictable
+ full bin capacity is utilized
+ first in/first out
- wall wear is higher (esp. for abrasives)
- higher stresses on walls
- more height is required
3/17/00
KVJ 26
Funnel flow (+/-)
+ less height required
- ratholing
- a problem for segregating solids
- first in/last out
- time consolidation effects can be severe
- silo collapse
- flooding
- reduction of effective storage capacity
3/17/00
KVJ 27
How is a hopper designed?
Measure
- powder cohesion/interparticle friction
- wall friction
- compressibility/permeability
Calculate
- outlet size
- hopper angle for mass flow
- discharge rates
3/17/00
KVJ 28
What about angle of repose?
o
Pile of bulk
solids
o
o
3/17/00
KVJ 29
Angle of Repose
Angle of repose is not an adequate
indicator of bin design parameters
In fact, it (the angle of repose) is only useful in the
determination of the contour of a pile, and its
popularity among engineers and investigators is due
not to its usefulness but to the ease with which it is
measured. - Andrew W. Jenike
Do not use angle of repose to design
the angle on a hopper!
3/17/00
KVJ 30
Bulk Solids Testing
Wall Friction Testing
Powder Shear Testing - measures both
powder internal friction and cohesion
Compressibility
Permeability
3/17/00
KVJ 31
Sources of Cohesion (Binding Mechanisms)
Solids Bridges
-Mineral bridges
-Chemical reaction
-Partial melting
-Binder hardening
-Crystallization
-Sublimation
Interlocking forces
Attraction Forces
-van der Waals
-Electrostatics
-Magnetic
Interfacial forces
-Liquid bridges
-Capillary forces
3/17/00
KVJ 32
Testing Considerations
Must consider the following variables
- time
- temperature
- humidity
- other process conditions
3/17/00
KVJ 33
Wall Friction Testing
Wall friction test is simply Physics 101 - difference for bulk
solids is that the friction coefficient, , is not constant.
P 101
N
F
F = N
3/17/00
KVJ 34
Wall Friction Testing
Jenike Shear Tester
Wall Test
Sample
Ring
Cover
W x A
S x A
Bracket
Bulk Solid
3/17/00
KVJ 35
Wall Friction Testing Results
Wall Yield Locus,
constant wall friction

Normal stress, o
W
a
l
l

s
h
e
a
r

s
t
r
e
s
s
,


t

Wall Yield Locus (WYL),
variable wall friction
Powder Technologists usually express as the
angle of wall friction,
= arctan
3/17/00
KVJ 36
Jenike Shear Tester
Ring
Cover
W x A
S x A
Bracket
Bulk Solid Bulk Solid
Shear plane
3/17/00
KVJ 37
Other Shear Testers
Peschl shear tester
Biaxial shear tester
Uniaxial compaction cell
Annular (ring) shear testers
3/17/00
KVJ 38
Ring Shear Testers
W x A
Bottom cell
rotates slowly
Arm connected to load
cells, S x A
Bulk
solid
3/17/00
KVJ 39
Shear test data analysis
o
t
C
f
c

o
1

3/17/00
KVJ 40
Stresses in Hoppers/Silos
Cylindrical section - Janssen equation
Conical section - radial stress field

Stresses = Pressures
3/17/00
KVJ 41
Stresses in a cylinder
h
dh
P
v
A
D
(P
v
+ dP
v
) A
A g dh
t

t

D

d
h

Consider the equilibrium of forces on a
differential element, dh, in a straight-
sided silo
P
v
A = vertical pressure acting from
above
A g dh = weight of material in element
(P
v
+ dP
v
) A = support of material from
below
t t D dh = support from solid friction on
the wall
(P
v
+ dP
v
) A + t t D dh = P
v
A + A g dh
3/17/00
KVJ 42
Stresses in a cylinder (contd)
Two key substitutions
t = P
w
(friction equation)

Janssens key assumption: P
w
= K P
v
This is not strictly true but
is good enough from an engineering view.
Substituting and rearranging,
A dP
v
= A g dh - K P
v
t D dh
Substituting A = (t/4) D
2
and integrating between h=0, P
v
= 0
and h=H and P
v
= P
v

P
v
= ( g D/ 4 K) (1 - exp(-4H K/D))
This is the Janssen equation.
3/17/00
KVJ 43
Stresses in a cylinder (contd)
hydrostatic
Bulk solids
Notice that the asymptotic pressure depends
only on D, not on H, hence this is why silos are
tall and skinny, rather than short and squat.
3/17/00
KVJ 44
Stresses - Converging Section
o
Over 40 years ago, the pioneer in bulk
solids flow, Andrew W. Jenike,
postulated that the magnitude of the
stress in the converging section of a
hopper was proportional to the distance
of the element from the hopper apex.

o = o ( r, u)
This is the radial stress field assumption.
3/17/00
KVJ 45
Silo Stresses - Overall
hydrostatic
Bulk solid
Notice that there is essentially no stress at
the outlet. This is good for discharge
devices!
3/17/00
KVJ 46
Janssen Equation - Example
A large welded steel silo 12 ft in diameter and 60 feet high is to be
built. The silo has a central discharge on a flat bottom. Estimate
the pressure of the wall at the bottom of the silo if the silo is filled
with a) plastic pellets, and b) water. The plastic pellets have the
following characteristics:
= 35 lb/cu ft = 20
The Janssen equation is
P
v
= ( g D/ 4 K) (1 - exp(-4H K/D))
In this case: D = 12 ft = tan = tan 20 = 0.364
H = 60 ft g = 32.2 ft/sec
2

= 35 lb/cu ft
3/17/00
KVJ 47
Janssen Equation - Example
K, the Janssen coefficient, is assumed to be 0.4. It can vary
according to the material but it is not often measured.
Substituting we get P
v
= 21,958 lb
m
/ft - sec
2
.
If we divide by gc, we get P
v
= 681.9 lb
f
/ft
2
or 681.9 psf

Remember that P
w
= K

P
v,
, so P
w
= 272.8 psf.
For water, P = g H and this results in P = 3744 psf, a factor of 14
greater!
3/17/00
KVJ 48
Types of Bins
Conical
Pyramidal
Watch for in-
flowing valleys
in these bins!
3/17/00
KVJ 49
Types of Bins
Wedge/Plane Flow
B
L
L>3B
Chisel
3/17/00
KVJ 50
A thought experiment
o
1

o
c

3/17/00
KVJ 51
The Flow Function
o
1

o
c

Flow function
Time flow function
3/17/00
KVJ 52
Determination of Outlet Size
o
1

o
c

Flow function
Time flow function
Flow factor
o
c,i


o
c,t


3/17/00
KVJ 53
Determination of Outlet Size
B = o
c,i
H(u)/
H(u) is a constant which is a function of
hopper angle
3/17/00
KVJ 54
H(u) Function
Cone angle from vertical
10 20 30 40 50 60
1
2
3
H
(
u
)

3/17/00
KVJ 55
Example: Calculation of a Hopper
Geometry for Mass Flow
An organic solid powder has a bulk density of 22 lb/cu ft. Jenike
shear testing has determined the following characteristics given
below. The hopper to be designed is conical.
Wall friction angle (against SS plate) = = 25
Bulk density = = 22 lb/cu ft
Angle of internal friction = o = 50
Flow function o
c
= 0.3 o
1
+ 4.3

Using the design chart for conical hoppers, at = 25

uc = 17 with 3 safety factor
& ff = 1.27
3/17/00
KVJ 56
Example: Calculation of a Hopper
Geometry for Mass Flow
ff = o/o
a
or o
a
= (1/ff) o

Condition for no arching => o
a
> o
c


(1/ff) o = 0.3 o
1
+ 4.3 (1/1.27) o = 0.3 o
1
+ 4.3

o
1
= 8.82 o
c
= 8.82/1.27 = 6.95

B = 2.2 x 6.95/22 = 0.69 ft = 8.33 in
3/17/00
KVJ 57
Material considerations for hopper design
Amount of moisture in product?
Is the material typical of what is
expected?
Is it sticky or tacky?
Is there chemical reaction?
Does the material sublime?
Does heat affect the material?
3/17/00
KVJ 58
Material considerations for hopper design
Is it a fine powder (< 200 microns)?
Is the material abrasive?
Is the material elastic?
Does the material deform under
pressure?
3/17/00
KVJ 59
Process Questions
How much is to be stored? For how long?
Materials of construction
Is batch integrity important?
Is segregation important?
What type of discharger will be used?
How much room is there for the hopper?
3/17/00
KVJ 60
Discharge Rates
Numerous methods to predict discharge
rates from silos or hopper
For coarse particles (>500 microns)
Beverloo equation - funnel flow
Johanson equation - mass flow
For fine particles - one must consider
influence of air upon discharge rate
3/17/00
KVJ 61
Beverloo equation
W = 0.58
b
g
0.5
(B - kd
p
)
2.5

where W is the discharge rate (kg/sec)

b
is the bulk density (kg/m
3
)
g is the gravitational constant
B is the outlet size (m)
k is a constant (typically 1.4)
d
p
is the particle size (m)
Note: Units must be SI
3/17/00
KVJ 62
Johanson Equation
Equation is derived from fundamental
principles - not empirical
W =
b
(t/4) B
2
(gB/4 tan u
c
)
0.5

where uc is the angle of hopper from vertical
This equation applies to circular outlets
Units can be any dimensionally consistent set
Note that both Beverloo and Johanson show
that W o B
2.5
!
3/17/00
KVJ 63
Discharge Rate - Example
An engineer wants to know how fast a compartment
on a railcar will fill with polyethylene pellets if the
hopper is designed with a 6 Sch. 10 outlet. The car
has 4 compartments and can carry 180000 lbs. The
bulk solid is being discharged from mass flow silo
and has a 65 angle from horizontal. Polyethylene
has a bulk density of 35 lb/cu ft.
3/17/00
KVJ 64
Discharge Rate Example
One compartment = 180000/4 = 45000 lbs.
Since silo is mass flow, use Johanson equation.
6 Sch. 10 pipe is 6.36 in diameter = B

W = (35 lb/ft
3
)(t/4)(6.36/12)
2
(32.2x(6.36/12)/4 tan 25)
0.5

W= 23.35 lb/sec
Time required is 45000/23.35 = 1926 secs or ~32 min.
In practice, this is too long - 8 or 10 would be a better
choice.
3/17/00
KVJ 65
The Case of Limiting Flow Rates
When bulk solids (even those with little
cohesion) are discharged from a
hopper, the solids must dilate in the
conical section of the hopper. This
dilation forces air to flow from the outlet
against the flow of bulk solids and in the
case of fine materials either slows the
flow or impedes it altogether.
3/17/00
KVJ 66
Limiting Flow Rates
Vertical
stress
Bulk
density
Interstitial gas pressure
Note that gas pressure is less than
ambient pressure
3/17/00
KVJ 67
Limiting Flow Rates
The rigorous calculation of limiting flow
rates requires simultaneous solution of
gas pressure and solids stresses
subject to changing bulk density and
permeability. Fortunately, in many
cases the rate will be limited by some
type of discharge device such as a
rotary valve or screw feeder.
3/17/00
KVJ 68
Limiting Flow Rates - Carleton Equation
g
d
v
B
v
p s
f f
= +
3 / 5
3 / 4
0
3 / 2 3 / 1
2
0
15
sin 4

o
3/17/00
KVJ 69
Carleton Equation (contd)
where
v
0
is the velocity of the bulk solid
o is the hopper half angle

s
is the absolute particle density

f
is the density of the gas

f
is the viscosity of the gas
3/17/00
KVJ 70
Silo Discharging Devices
Slide valve/Slide gate
Rotary valve
Vibrating Bin Bottoms
Vibrating Grates
others
3/17/00
KVJ 71
Rotary Valves
Quite commonly used to discharge
materials from bins.
3/17/00
KVJ 72
Screw Feeders
Dead Region
Better Solution
3/17/00
KVJ 73
Discharge Aids
Air cannons
Pneumatic Hammers
Vibrators
These devices should not be used in
place of a properly designed hopper!
They can be used to break up the
effects of time consolidation.