Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Unit Introduction Essay Lesson 8th grade level Overview Standards Objectives Materials Lesson Plan Handouts DVD Introduction Reinforcement Review Extension Options Homework Extensions Real Life Portal Back of the Book Resources Answer Key (pgs. 205-218) Reading Quizzes (pgs. 221-241) Landmark Sup. Court Cases (pgs. 245-257) DVD Guides (pgs. 261-266) Glossary (pgs. 269-273) Educational Resources (pgs. 277-280) Legal Experts & Scholars (pgs 283-289) Parent Letter (p. 290)
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies 8. Delineate and evaluate the reasoning in seminal U.S. texts, including the application of constitutional principles and use of legal reasoning (e.g., in U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions and dissents) and the premises, purposes, and arguments in works of public advocacy (e.g., The Federalist, presidential addresses). 9. Analyze seventeenth-, eighteenth-, and nineteenthcentury foundational U.S. documents of historical and literary significance (including The Declaration of Independence, the Preamble to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and Lincolns Second Inaugural Address) for their themes, purposes, and rhetorical features.
Which of these groups believed the Constitution as it was originally written in 1787 provided for a strong national government and sufficiently protected individual rights at the same time?
1. Federalists
2. Anti-Federalists 3. Democratic-Republicans
4. Know-Nothings
5. Not sure
2.
3.
State legislatures have no security for the powers now presumed to remain to them
I do not conceive we can exist long as a nation without havinga power which will pervade the whole Union Repeated violations of these parchment barriers have been committed by overbearing majorities in every State. Not sure
4.
5.
Discussion: Madison feared that a bill of rights would not protect individuals from the abuse of their rights by popular majorities. Can you think of examples of a majority taking away rights from individuals? In the country? In your town? At school? How do you think those rights might be made more secure?
Federalists
Bill of rights not needed Constitution creates a LIMITED government Specific listing could be dangerous
BOTH
Purpose of government is to protect rights Give some authority to states, some to national government
Anti-Federalists
Did not trust a strong central government Some states demanded a bill of rights
Foundational (First) Principles: Strong central government needed popular sovereignty, government by to protect rights consent, limited States have their government, own declarations of property rights, rights civic virtue...
Washington
Prepare an answer sheet by numbering 1-8 Read the quotes on signs and classify each quote: Federalist or Anti-Federalist
Mason
Sherman
Madison
Hamilton
Jefferson
2
3 Anti-Federalist
Mason
Sherman
Federalist
4
5
Anti-Federalist
Mason
Hamilton
6
Federalist 7
Anti-Federalist
Mason
8 Anti-Federalist
Madison Jefferson
Which of these groups believed the Constitution as it was originally written in 1787 provided for a strong national government and sufficiently protected individual rights at the same time?
1. Federalists
2. Anti-Federalists 3. Democratic-Republicans
4. Know-Nothings
5. Not sure
2.
3.
State legislatures have no security for the powers now presumed to remain to them
I do not conceive we can exist long as a nation without havinga power which will pervade the whole Union Repeated violations of these parchment barriers have been committed by overbearing majorities in every State. Not sure
4.
5.
We Want YOU