Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Biodiversity
Unmanaged
young trees crowd area fierce competition
fewer numbers of and smaller shrubs, herbs, and grasses
lower biodiversity
High biodiversity
strong indicator of health
Comparison of Biodiversity Between Managed and Unmanaged Old-Growth Ponderosa Pine Forests
16 14
number
13.50
12 10 8 6 4 2 0
8.75
8.19
7.54
Managed Unmanaged
2.03 1.95 0.60 0.51 Species Richness Pileou's Evenness Index Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index
Comparison of Importance Values Between Managed and Unmanaged Old-Growth Stands (These represent the top 5 of 68 species of plant recorded)
20
relative importance (%)
16.7
15 10 5 0
ABICON ARNCOR FRAVIR PINPON POANER 2.8 2.9 3.1 8.1 9.1 9.5 6.8 2.3 3.6 Managed Unmanaged
Density
Crowded stands
Tree density high
Trees compete
Canopy dense
Hinders smaller plants and brush to produce food
Death takes away the nitrogen-rich material
Duff Layers
Duff is the decomposing plant material on the forest floor
Provides nitrogen for vegetation Holds soil moisture Blocks the sun Cools the soil Blocks raindrop erosion
Comparison of Relative Cover Under Managed and Unmanaged Ponderosa Pine Forests
70 60
relative cover (%)
61.1
50 40 30 20 10 0
Growth Rings
Indicate amount of yearly growth Healthier tree
Less rings
More growth occurs
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Comparison of soil moisture, tree growth rates and disease frequency between managed and unmanaged old growth ponderosa pine stands in Coffeepot Flat on the Fremont Winema National Forest
32.5 17.95 9.33 2.18 soil moisture (%) 2.77 2.6 disease frequency (%)
Managed Unmanaged
Results
Lower tree density Higher percent soil moisture Higher biodiversity Faster growth (fewer growth rings/cm) Lower rates of disease Less duff
Conclusion
Old growth forests falling apart
Fire suppression
high densities
disease and insect damage
Possible solution
thin understory (historic fire effects)