INTRODUCTION:

China opened up in 1978, India did so in 1991 i.e. 14 yrs. after. India and China rank among the front runners of global economy.

Both the countries were among the most ancient civilizations.

CHINA AND INDIA

INDIA AND CHINA EMERGING GLOBAL PLAYERS:
High Economic Growth Rate. Rapid Share In The World. Large Inflow Of Funds. Engines Of Demand Growth In Economy.

Development Strategies:
China (1949 1978) -India (1947 mid 1980s)
o Communist take-over in China in 1949 and at Indias Independence from Great Britain in 1947. o Both adopted a Soviet Style Centrally Planned Development Strategies. o Both insulated their economies from the world economy.

Development Strategies: Contd.

o China's economy was almost entirely stateowned and state-controlled whereas Indias economy was state-controlled and directed but mostly privately owned except in industry, finance, transport and communication o China was a single-party controlled state whereas India is formally a federal state with a constitutionally set assignment of powers and responsibilities between the Central and state governments.

Comparision of India and China in different sectors

Liberalization of the market

While India's liberalization policies started in the 1990s, China welcomed foreign direct investment and private investment in the mid 1980s. This made a significant change in its economy and the GDP increased considerably.

Difference in infrastructure
Compared to India, China has a much well developed infrastructure Aspects like manpower and labor development, water management, health care facilities and services, communication, civic amenities are well developed in China which has put a positive impact in its economy to make it one of the best in the world. India is still plagued by problems such as poverty, unemployment, lack of civic amenities and so on. In fact unlike India, China is still investing in huge amounts towards manpower development and strengthening of infrastructure.

IT/BPO
India's earnings from the BPO sector alone in 2010 is $49.7 billion while China earned $35.76 billion. because of the following reasons Process and Quality: India would soon have the highest number of ISO-9000 software companies in the world. Government Support: The Indian Government has formulated policies and laws to ensure growth of the ITESBPO sector in India. Skilled and Talented Resource: India has highly talented and qualified resource in IT. Education System: The education standard is at par with global standards.

4.4 Communication
Native language: English Number who has Internet access: 287.5 million Percentage of Worlds online population: 35.2% Native language: Other European Number who has Internet access: 276 million Percentage of Worlds online population: 37.9% Native language: All Asian languages (including Mandarin) Number of world online population 240 million Percentage of World online population: 33%

 over 80% of scientific articles are published in English, up from only 60% fifty years ago. Indian managers ability to communicate easily in English gives them a tremendous advantage and India is making skilled use of that advantage.

Company Development
Chinese capital market lags behind the Indian capital market in terms of predictability and transparency. Shanghai Stock Exchange is larger than the BSE SSE has US$1.7 trillion with 849 listed companies and the BSE has US$1 trillion with 4,833 listed companies. But BSE is run on the principles of international guidelines and is more stable due to the quality of the listed companies. Chinese government is the major stake holder of most of its State-owned organizations hence the listed firms have to run according to the rules and regulations laid down by the government. Hence India is ahead of China in matters of financial transparency.

Company Management Capabilities

management reform training in China began 30 years ago and sadly the subject has still not picked up as a matter of interest by the citizens of the country. most of the countries came to China and manufactured their goods. It was not Chinas exports that drove the economy instead it was the export products of outsiders. Indian companies are rapidly expanding mergers and acquisitions. Some of the recent examples include; Tata Steel's $13.6 Billion Acquisition of Corus, Tata Tea's purchase of a controlling stake in Britain's Tetley for US$407 million, Indian Pharmaceutical giant Ranbaxy's acquisition of Romania's Terapiaetc.

 Raeesa slides

Impact of Global Economic Crisis and Response:

In China also GDP growth declined -from 13% in 2007, to 9 percent in 2008 and even further to a projected 7.2% in 2009. Real export growth declined from 23.3% in 2006, to 8.8% in 2008. In 2009, the growth projected at a negative 10.1%. Fiscal balance worsened from 0.7$ of GDP in 2007 to a projected -4.9% in 2009 With domestic demand at 68% of gross domestic expenditure, much lower than Indias 83%, the scope for domestic demand expansion through stimulus packages is much greater in China. Chinas stimulus packages have in fact been far larger in magnitude (second only to the U.S) as a proportion of GDP than Indias (a total of 4.4% for three years 2008-10 versus 0.5%).

 However, with Chinese investment being comparatively inefficient, it would be better to focus on expanding households consumption demand, which is only 25% as compared to Indias 44% of domestic expenditure. China runs a substantial current account surplus-11.3% of GDP in 2007, 9.8% in 2008 and a projected 8.0% in 2009 and its foreign currency reserves of $1.95 trillion in 2008 is projected at $2.17 trillion in 2009, already reached at the end of June. With most of reserves invested in U.S. Treasury bills and securities and doubts being raised about the credit rating of U.S. government debt, China is understandably concerned about the security and value of the reserves. The governor of the Peoples Bank of China has defended Chinas high domestic savings rates and expressed his support for a move away from the U.S. dollar as the major international reserve currency

 On balance, given Chinas extremely modest fiscal deficit, large scope for expanding domestic consumption and the availability of sizeable resources, China can comfortably adjust to the crisis and resume growth in the near future. China has liberalized trade far more than India India still one of the most protected countries in the developing world by some measures Chinas embrace of openness and its purposive use in accelerating domestic reform process have been important as compared to continuing skepticism about the benefits of openness in India.

 Future Prospects Indias potential future prospects once the global crisis ends and growth resumes are bright. Realizing the potential requires that the following reform tasks are completed. A credible commitment to complete the reform agenda is needed urgently. For example, India could announce its willingness to consider much more liberal commitment to reduce barriers to agricultural and nonagricultural trade in the Doha negotiations; the budget presented on July 6 unfortunately did not announce reductions in non-merit subsidies and handouts, revive and go further on labour law reform. Constraints of infrastructure physical and human to be addressed. Reform of labour laws their dysfunctionality and growth and equity costs has been known for a long time Reform of bankruptcy laws took a decade on average to close a business in June 2008 Rethinking SEZs along the lines of Chinese SEZs