Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Land
Product or
Labour service
generated
– value added
Capital
Analysis of Production Function:
Short Run
In the short run at least one factor fixed in supply but all other
factors capable of being changed
Reflects ways in which firms respond to changes
in output (demand)
Can increase or decrease output using more or less of some
factors but some likely to be easier to change than others
Increase in total capacity only possible in the long run
Analysis of Production Function:
Short Run
In times of rising
sales (demand)
firms can increase
labour and capital
but only up to a
certain level – they
will be limited by
the amount of
space. In this
example, land is
the fixed factor
which cannot be
altered in the short
run.
Analysis of Production Function:
Short Run
If demand slows
down, the firm can
reduce its variable
factors – in this
example it reduces
its labour and
capital but again,
land is the factor
which stays fixed.
Analysis of Production Function:
Short Run
If demand slows
down, the firm can
reduce its variable
factors – in this
example, it
reduces its labour
and capital but
again, land is the
factor which stays
fixed.
Law of Variable Proportions
Depending on the nature of the product curves, the
economists have divided the diagram into three parts
on the basis of quantity of labor used in the production
process. These three region are O-L2, L2-L3,L3-infinite.
In the long run, the firm can change all its factors of production thus
increasing its total capacity. In this example it has doubled its capacity.
Step Capital Labor Capital-Labor Total
K L ratio Output
K/L
1 10 20 10/20= ½ 100
2 20 40 20/40= ½ 300
3 40 80 40/80= ½ 600
q = f(K,L)
Marginal Physical Product
To study variation in a single input, we
define marginal physical product as the
additional output that can be produced
by employing one more unit of that input
while holding other inputs constant
q
marginal physical product of capital MPK fK
K
q
marginal physical product of labor MPL fL
L
Diminishing Marginal
Productivity
The marginal physical product of an
input depends on how much of that input
is used
In general, we assume diminishing
marginal productivity
MPK 2q
fKK 0
K K
MPL 2q
fLL 0
L L
Diminishing Marginal
Productivity
Because of diminishing marginal
productivity, 19th century economist
Thomas Malthus worried about the effect
of population growth on labor productivity
But changes in the marginal productivity
of labor over time also depend on
changes in other inputs such as capital.
Average Physical Product
Labor productivity is often measured by
average productivity
output q f (K , L )
APL
labor input L L
f(K,L) = q0
Isoquant Map
Each isoquant represents a different level
of output
output rises as we move northeast
K per period
q = 30
q = 20
L per period
Marginal Rate of Technical
Substitution (MRTS)
The slope of an isoquant shows the rate
at which L can be substituted for K
K per period
- slope = marginal rate of technical
substitution (MRTS)
L per period
LA LB
Returns to Scale
How does output respond to increases in
all inputs together?
Suppose that all inputs are doubled, would
output double?
Returns to scale have been of interest to
economists since the days of Adam Smith
Returns to Scale
Smith identified two forces that come into
operation as inputs are doubled
greater division of labor and specialization of
labor
loss in efficiency because management may
become more difficult given the larger scale of
the firm
Returns to Scale
If the production function is given by q =
f(K,L) and all inputs are multiplied by the
same positive constant (m > 1), then
Effect on Output Returns to Scale
f(mK,mL) = mf(K,L) Constant
f(mK,mL) < mf(K,L) Decreasing
f(mK,mL) > mf(K,L) Increasing
Returns to Scale
It is possible for a production function to
exhibit constant returns to scale for some
levels of input usage and increasing or
decreasing returns for other levels
economists refer to the degree of returns to
scale with the implicit notion that only a fairly
narrow range of variation in input usage and
the related level of output is being
considered
Constant Returns to Scale
Constant returns-to-scale production
functions have the useful theoretical
property that that the MRTS between
K and L depends only on the ratio of K
to L, not the scale of operation
q=3
q=2
q=1
L per period
Returns to Scale
Returns to scale can be generalized to a
production function with n inputs
q = f(X1,X2,…,Xn)
If all inputs are multiplied by a positive
constant m, we have
f(mX1,mX2,…,mXn) = mkf(X1,X2,…,Xn)=mkq
If k=1, we have constant returns to scale
If k<1, we have decreasing returns to scale
If k>1, we have increasing returns to scale
The Linear Production Function
Suppose that the production function is
q = f(K,L) = aK + bL
This production function exhibits constant
returns to scale
f(mK,mL) = amK + bmL = m(aK + bL) = mf(K,L)
All isoquants are straight lines
MRTS is constant
The Linear Production Function
Capital and labor are perfect substitutes
K per period
MRTS is constant as K/L changes
slope = -b/a
q1 q2 q3
L per period
Fixed Proportions
No substitution between labor and capital
is possible
K per period K/L is fixed at b/a
q3/a q3
q2
q1
L per period
q3/b
Cobb-Douglas Production
Function
Suppose that the production function is
q = f(K,L) = AKaLb A,a,b > 0
This production function can exhibit any
returns to scale
f(mK,mL) = A(mK)a(mL) b = Ama+b KaLb = ma+bf(K,L)
if a + b = 1 constant returns to scale
if a + b > 1 increasing returns to scale
if a + b < 1 decreasing returns to scale
Cobb-Douglas Production
Function
Suppose that hamburgers are produced
according to the Cobb-Douglas function
q = 10K 0.5 L0.5
Since a+b=1 constant returns to
scale
The isoquant map can be derived
q = 50 = 10K 0.5 L0.5 KL = 25
q = 100 = 10K 0.5 L0.5 KL = 100
The isoquants are rectangular hyperbolas
Cobb-Douglas Production
Function
The MRTS can easily be calculated
f L 5L0.5 K 0.5 K
MRTS ( L for K ) 0.5 0.5
f K 5L K L
The MRTS declines as L rises and K falls
The MRTS depends only on the ratio of K
and L