- ДокументWhy Does Aggregate Earnings Growth Reflectзагружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- ДокументED PSAK 3 (R10) Laporan Keuangan Interim.pdfзагружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- Документ25_Buku_Perencanaan_Keuangan.pdfзагружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- ДокументThe Effects of a Legal Process on Management Ofзагружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- ДокументRobust Methodзагружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- ДокументNon-financial Factors in the Going-concern Opinionзагружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- ДокументBias Daripenggunaan Model Dimbarзагружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- Документpsikotest.pdfзагружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- ДокументConceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions.pdfзагружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- Документteori akuntansi dan akuntansi multiparadigma.pdfзагружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- ДокументStandard setters contend that fair value accounting yields the most relevant measurement for financial instruments. We examine this claim by comparing the value relevance of banks’ financial statements under fair value accounting with that under current GAAP, which is largely based on historical costs. We find that the combined value relevance of book value of equity and income under fair value is less than that under GAAP. We also find that fair value income is less value-relevant than GAAP income because of the inclusion of transitory unrealized gains and losses in fair value income. More surprisingly, we find that book value of equity under fair value is not more valuerelevant than under GAAP, due both to divergence between exit value and value-in-use and to measurement error in fair value estimates. Overall, our results suggest that financial statements under fair value accounting provide less relevant information for bank valuation than financial statements under current GAAP.загружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx
- ДокументCollins 1979загружено:Anonymous IhnJWRx