Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 352

. .

300.piter.com

30 0
300-

an
-
--

2006

88.4927

159.9.072(075)

91

. .
91 : . .: ,
2006. 351 : . ( ).
ISBN 5-94723-045-3

,
.
,
. , - . , ()
. ,
, , , .
8 8 . 4 9 2 7
159.9.072(075)

ISBN 5-94723-045-3

, 2006

.
1.1.
1.2. .

:
1.2.1.

1.2.2. .
1.2.3. .
1.2.4.
1.3. XX
1.3.1. 1901 .

1920-
1.3.2.
1.3.3. 1930 1939
1.3.4. 1940-
1.3.5. 1950-
1.3.6.
1960-

1.3.7.
1970-

1.3.8.
1980-

1.3.9. 1990-
1.4.
1.5.

6
8
12
13
17
19
24
26
26
37
39
50
56
63
69
73
77
81
84
95


2.1 .
99
2.2.
101
2.3.

105
2.3.1. .. 105
2.3.2.
106
2.3.3.
107
2.4.

108
2.5.
112
2.5.1. .

113
2.5.2.
114
2.5.3.
120
2.5.4.
124
2.6.
126
2.7.

131


2.8.
2.8.1.
2.8.2.
2.8.3.
2.9.

139
139
141
143
147
148

:

3.1 . ( ).... 151
3.2.
153
3.3.
156
3.4.
157
3.5
158
3.6.
161
3.7.
162
3.8.
166
3.9.
167

176


4. 1 .
4.2. ,

4.3.
4.3.1 .
4.3.2.

4.3.3.
4.3.4.
4.3.5.
4.3.6.
4.3.7. :
4.4.
4.5.
4.6.
4.7.
4.8.
4.9.
4.10. ,
4.11 . ,

4.12. :
4.13.


5.1 . ,

5.2. .
,
5.2.1.

178
181
182
182
184
186
188
189
192
195
196
197
209
211
212
215
223
231
237
248
252

255
258
258


5.2.2.
5.2.3.
5.2.4. ,

5.3.


6.1 .
6.2. :
6.2.1.
6.2.2. ,

6.2.3.
6.3.

6.4.
6.5. ?
6.6.

262
265
267
276
283
285
287
287
290
295
299
308
315
318
320

322

347

.35 1


,
. , ,
, , , , ,
. ( 3!), , , .
,
-
.
- , (
!) ,
, ,
- ,
, , ,
.

.
, 1
, 2
, , 3
. ,
, .

. -, ,
,
. ( , ) . , . ,
. ., . . . : , 1979.
. .: . . ( ). : ', 1979; . ., . . . 16 PF // . 2000. . 21. 5.
. ., . . -

// . 1994. 5; . ., . . - . .: , 2001.

,
. ,
, - (., , 2001).
-, , ,
, . ,
.

,
, ,
, , .

.
, Web-:
psydiag@i.kiev.ua; www.lbvs.kiev.ua/psydiag
.
, 2002 .

1 1


, , .
,
- .


,
.
, -
, .
, , , , , . ,
,
, ,
( ) .

1.1.
, .
,
, .
,
, .

1. .

,
. , ,
( !) .
. (. , 7:5-7), :
7.5 . :
, , , ,
.
7.6 ;
- .
7.7 :
...
.
(372-287 . . .), , . .
. , , . ,
, , .
, , ,
, : , ; , ; , , ,
.
, , . , 2200
.
.
.
, , , . 413 . . . 7000 , , :
-

.
, .

, . -

10 1. .

, , .
(, )
. ,
, .
,
. ,
(, , ) .
- . , , - . , , , ,
, ,
- . ,
- .
-

, , , , . , ,
, . . ( . ).
... ,
;
, ,
, ,
- <...>. , ,
.

,
1
.
,
, .
, , , (1530-1589). , de
Ingenios, 1575 ., . 27 .
, , , , .
, XIX XX .
, , , . , .
, . .
. .: 3 . - .: , 1971. - . 3. - . 347.

1.

11


1908 . -. 1924 . -, .1928.
( ). -, -.
- .
(1971).

- .
,

-
, - .


, . , , . , ,
. , ,
, ,
, .

(1982),

, XIX .,
- ,
.

(1772-1840) (1812-1880).
, , . , ,
.
,
( ).
,
.
, ,
, . , ,
( ).
, , , . , , ,
, -

12 1. .


. , ,
, .
, . ,
.
, .
,
-
. . , , ,
, , . . . , 1835 . Sur
L'Homme .

1.2.
.
1

, . , 30- .
XIX . , , ,
, . . ,
. ,
. . ( XIX ), . , , ,
.
, , , . 1816 . , ,
, , ,
.

1.2. . 13

,
- .
, .
,
. ,
, . ,

.
, , . (1818-1889). , , (
, ),
. .
,
. .
. (
), , , , . , , , .
, , .
. . (1976) , , , , .
- , , . ,
, , .

1.2.1.


,

.
. .
, , . ,
,
: , -

14 1. .


1822 . .
, .

,
.
. - (1844)
- ,
. ,

.
- ,
-
, -
. 1860- .
. ,
. - . , . ,
. 1911 .,
.

,
(mind), , , . - ,
1
.
, . , . ,
() . 1883 .
: ;
, .
. - , ,
. , ,
.
1884 . , . . (. ).
,
, ; , Galton Fr. Psychometric Experiment. - Brain. - 1879. - V. 2. - P. 148-157.

1.2. . 15

. 1885 . .
9000 .
, . ,

. 1888 .
- ( 1888 .
). :

, , ,
- .
, -
,
, .
. : . , . , ,
,
, , .
, , , .
. ,
- ,
. .,
, .
.
- ,
- .
,
- .
, - .



, - .



(),
. -
.
, . (1857-1936),
. .
. d-. , .
, . ,
() . 1884 . . ,

16 1. .

, :
, ,
1
.
, , . , , . . ,
, ,
.
- .
.
, ,
- .
, . , ,
( . . 6).
1878 . Nineteenth Century, Brain .
-

, :
,
, , ,
, ,


; ,

.
. , 300 ( ). . ,

, .
, . . , .
. 75 . .
, ,
. , , .
.
505 , 560 , 46 , 29 4 ,
36 , 57 , 107 . . :
: , ;
: ,
;
Galton Fr. Measurement of Character // Fortnightly Review for August. - 1884. - V. 34. - P. 179-185.

1.2. . 17

-
186 . ().
- (1880),
( , 1886).
. (1883-1886).
-
. ,
, .
(, 1887-1891). (1895). 1917 .
,
., .

, , 1944 .
().

, , ;
:
.
, ;
:
( . . ..) , ; , .
. , ( ), . -
, . . ,
35 .
, , .
, : , !

1.2.2.

. , -
, . - .
,
, . ,
. ,

18 1. .

. . ,
.
1890 . . Mind
,
, . (Mental Test and Measurement) . . (mental test) , ,
.
, . ,
, , . . , 2
. , ,
( )
, , . ,
, 50 - .
, (,
), , , , ,
50- , 10- , .
, ,
.
, . . ,
( ,
). , ,
.
XIX . -

.
(1895-1896).
, ,
, ,
. .
. , .
Mental Test and Measurement // Mind. - 1890. - V. 15. - P. 373.

1.2.

. 19

,
. , , 1891 . 1500
, , .
. , 1200 . , , . 1901 .
, , : -0,08 ; -0,02 ;
0,02 .
, , - .
XIX ., , ,
, . , , .
, . , XX .

1.2.3.


- ,
- .
-

,

.
,
, .
1890- . ,
-
. ,
, 1896 ,
- , , , ,

,
-

.
-
- ,
.
(1902)
-
.
.
, ,
, , .
- XVIII
. ,
, ,

20

1. .


1857 . .
.
- ,
. ,
. .
1894 . -
. -
-
- .

. . 1894 . .
- ,
. .
1899.
- , 1905 .

,
.1911..

. 1889 . . , ,
, : , , . (1895),
, , .
,
, , , . 1891
14 .
, , , . , , : , , , .
, , , ,
. , . 1897 .
, .
.

.
. ,
. .

, 1904 .
, , ,
. ,

1.2. . 21


1850 . ().
, (1873).
,
- . (18801886), - -
(1886-1894). -
(18941899). ,
. ,

.
.
.
- . -
() 1909 .

, ,
, . , , . ,
- .
, , . , , , , . ,

, , , ,
, , .
1905 . . ,
- 30 ,
- . ,
- , . ,
(,

5- 14- ). ,
- - ,
- , ,
,
. - ,
, - ,
- ,
.
1908 . .
59 , 3 13
,
. 67 % 75 %.
( ) ,
;

22

1. .


10 1873 . ().
- . 1899 .,
- , .
.
.

1900 . 1901 1905 . . 1905-1920
- -. 1904 ., ,
,
- .

,
. , -
, -
. -
-
. (1905). 1912-
1960 . .
. . 1961 .
,
.
.
, ,
.
- ,
.
(1911)
1
7 8 .
7
1. .
2. .
3. .
4. .
5. .
8
1. . .
2. 20 1.
3. (4 ).
4. , , , .
5. .
,
- . ,
(- ), ,
.
, , ,
.

1.2. .

23

, , . . (mental age),
. .

. . , , 8- (
), 8 , 9- 9 . .
. , ,
. , , . , ,
. ,
. ,

- 12 .

:

, 8 2 .

.

, .
4- , 12-.
(1912) , .
(Intelligence Quotient),
1
- IQ, :

,
, .

24

1. .

1871 . .
, , .
1897
. .
.
18
. ,
1907 1909 .
XX .
. 1900 . ,
,
- .

1916
.

,
,
. 1934 ., , . ,
. . 1938 . ( ).

, , , , . , ,
, , . (, ).
, .
:
,
. XX .
.

1.2.4.
,
, , ,
, ,
, .
. ,
1901 . . , 1904 .
: ,
.
.
. , ,
{generalfactor G),
- ( ) (S1
S2, S3 . .), .
- ( X ):

1.2. .

25


1863 . . 34 , . 1897 .
.
1906 .
-
. -
(1907-1911), - (1911-1928),
(1928 1931).
.
, ,
- ,
.

1945 .


. ,
. ,
. .
.
. ,
, , .
, , G (mental energy). G , .
, G, ,
,

. , G .

, . ,
, , .
, , G.
, , , , , , ,
S-.

26

1. .

1.3. XX
.
, XIX .
- , ,
. ,
XIX . ,
, XIX .!
, ,
XX .

1.3.1.
1901 . 1920-
.
,
, XX ., . ,

- .
- .
, ,
. ,
, . , 83 % , 80 % , 79 % 87 %
- .
( 1908 .), . ,
X. . .
,
, . , . (
) 2100 180 . ,
11 . ,
IQ. IQ, ,
: IQ 90 109 , IQ 70 ,
IQ 140 .
, . ,
, -

1.3. XX .

27

1866 . . (1887).
(1889).1896.
,
(1899).
. 1902.,
, -
,

. 1908 .
, .
1910 . ,
. .
1917 . ,
.1918.
, (1922). 1927 . ,
, , . ,
- , ,
- . 1957 .

IQ.
,
. , .
. .
. , ,
, . ?
, , , , . ,
( , , ).
11 , 10- , ,
10- , 12- .
, (. .
, ). , , .
, , . ,

28

1.

, . , , , 45-
, ,
.
,
1911 ., ,
11,13 14 .
, ()
: , ()
; , ;
.


- , ,
- : ,
; ;
.
, , .

()

1905
1908

1911
1916
1937

1960
1972
1986


1

, ,

30 ,
,
-


, ,

, 4,5 .
2,1 .
15 ,
(5 . ), : 2-0, 23-11

(1917), , , XXI .:
?
, ,
IQ, , , .
, . .

1.3. XX .

29


1877 .
.
. 1903 .
. (1905) . 1906 . - .

.
- .
- .
1922 . -
,
.
( 1923 .)
.
.
- 1956 .

XX .
.
.
(1886-1964), . 1912 .
, .
. , , , ,
, .
, . 1918 .

. . , .
,
, , . (1917) .
1917 .
.
. , ,
. : . ,
. , . 11 , . ,
, -

30

1. .

.
. ,
. , ,
, .
, , .
, ,
.
.
: , . ,
,
. ,
,
, , , , (. . ,
, , ,
), ,
. , , .
, , . , ( ,
). 7 , . 100 300
.
1 726 000
83 000 . 500 000 ,
8000 , 20 000
, . . , 3 % 10 ,
13,5 . .
, , , -

1.3. XX . 31


1900 . ().
- . -.
- ,
- .
(1936,1951,1978).
- . 1930- .
, ,
- . (1981)
4 ,
6- . (1959)
- .
1963 . ,
- . 1984 .

, . , , , ,
, ( 1 566 011 , 28 1918 . 31 1919 ., 25,3 %
, ). ,
. , , ,
( , Army Alpha, ,
, , ,
., Army Beta
).
,
,
.
(1922), (1923), (1922).
, , : (1923),
; (1922); CAVD
(1925), ; (1926); - (1927);
(1920); , (1920), (1925). . (1928)
:
, , .
-

32

1. .


1886 . .
- .
1924 .

,
- .

. 1950 .
(-
). -
- .
, / , - ,

.
1947 . , . (1949). . 1959 .


1883 . - ().
. (19131916), (1916-1917).
-
- (1919-1925).
(1922-1948).
- , , ,
- , , ,
- . , ,
, .
.
. . 1972 .

, ,
.
, ,
(1920); , . 1923 . ( ,
); (1926),
,
,
- ; ,
(1913). ,
, , ,
- , .
,
,
. :
1) -

1.3. XX .

33


1880 . .
,
- (1906).
-
(1915).

. -

,
. .
, .
, .
. - () 1961 .

; 2)
; 3)
, , . . , ,
.
- (1925).
,
4
- . 1924 .
.
-
- (1929) 195 -,
3 30 .
,
60 .

, -

,
- .
- : , (,

- ),
(, ,
).
(
- ), - , , ,
.
1921 . ,
. 1528 ,
135 200, 3 9 . , , . -

34

1. .

1869 . .
(1891). ( 1896, 1897).
(1899).
.
- ,
1942 .
(1914). , - ,
- .

1938 .
. 1962 ., .

12 , . , 35 ,
98 % .
, ( , )
.
,

( ).
. -
(
, )
- .
- , ,
- .
(1917),
,
( , . . , 1909 . 1
).
. 85 116. 12 . . 75 ,
: , ( ),
, 90 ,
. 1905 . ,
.

1.3. XX .

35

-
1884 . ( -).
(1906 .). , . ( , 1911). .
1917 . .
,
(1919). (1921). .
(1927).
- (1927).
1943 ., ,
. 1955 .
, - . 1963 .

( ) ( ). .
1924 . . ,
(20 , , , , ).
(1921-1922). , (1920) halo effect (
- ), (
- ).
(1921),
.
(1921),
(-0 ). : , ;
;
; . , .
, , .
- 1919 .
. (18751932) , , , , .
, ,
,
, , , , , ,
. ,
. , -

36

1. .


1884 . .
- , , ,
.
- ,
- , 1912.
, - .
, 1913 .
,
.
, ,
1910 .
. -
.
.
, .
, ,
, 1911 ., , 1917.
, , ,
- 1921 . ,
- . 1922 .
. , ,
- .

, , .
1929 . . . . (). .
1920- .
,
( , ). . ,
, .
1920- . . 1921 .
; 1922 .
. 1927 . {Strong Vocational Interest Blank). , . 420 , 34 .

.
Attitude Testing (1928).
1921 . .

1.3. XX .

37


1884 . (1909) (1911) .
, 1914 . -,
(1920-1931).
. 1924 .
, (1927),
. (1928) ,
,
- . 1931 .
- 1950 . 1961 .

, , , .
10 -
, , ,
. - ,
.
. (. ) ( ,

- , ;
).

- ,

,
(1928). -
. (. ).

1.3.2.
XX . ,
, .
, . . , .
-

, ,
(- , , ,
- ).
1920- . 1300 , 30 (. , 1949).
, , -

38

1. .

, . , ,
. . (1982, . 1), ,
,
.
, 1
, .
,
,
,
. , ,
, . , , , , ,
. . .
, , , : .
,
.
, . , 1920- .,
, , (, 1982, . 25).
. ,
, , .
1920- . , .
. . , , , -
() . ,
,
( !).
, : ... , 2
. .
R. Psychologische Diagnostik: Einfuhrung und Uberblick // Handbuch der Psychologic Bd.6.
Gottingen, 1966.
Ibid.

1.3. XX .

39

. , .
, -, (
, ,
), -, .

1.3.3. 1930- 1939 .


1930- . .
. , 1936 . : -
141, 68
- .
(r- reuter Personality Inventory),
(Seashore Measures of Musical Talent)

(Strong VocationalInterestBlank).
. 1930 . , 6 16 ,
, ,

{ArthurPoint Scale
ofPerformanceTests) .
- -,
12-.
. {Cornell Performance Ability Scale)

, -
,
-.

: - ,
.
- 1937 .
2 , , 1916 .: 11 13 . ,
L ( : ).
3000
18 ,
, .
1937 . , 1916.: ;
, . , .
.
. - 1937 . -,
-.

40

1. .

-
1900 .
- , 1925 .
(- )
. ,
. - 1930 .
.
1932 . . ,
, 1949
. ,
- ,
. 1963-1964
. - ,
, ,
.
65 . 1986 .

1938 . , , , . , .
. , ,
.
- , -,
,
- (
- ,
- ,
- ).
. .
,
- .
1930- . (Babcock's Deterioration Test). -
, 24
.
.
, .
,
. . (1936)
, , -, . ,
, ,
, . -,
.
, :
?

1.3. XX .

41


1896 . 6 -. 1916 ., 1917- . , ,
,
.
-
- , ,

. 1919 ., ,
,
, . -
( ). 1927- 1932 . , 1932 . .
1935 . .
- ,
. -
- -.
, 1981 .,
.


- (Wechsler-Bellevue, 1939).
11 , . , , ,
, .
, , , . ( ) ,
, , ,
.
: ,
() .
( !) ,
. IQ
100 ; , ( ) IQ-
. , , . IQ :

42

1. .


1874 . .

.

(1895), (1896);
(1897)
(1898) .
- .
- .

, , ,
.

. - ,
. .
- , 1949 .

()

, - , , , .
, 15 22 , 35 .
,
, .
,

, .


( , , , ). 1939 .
, .
1937 .
(The California Tests of Mental Maturity).
-
.

- ,
. - ,
-
, , ,
, - .
1938 .

(Primary Mental Abilities Test).

-- , ,
, . ,

1.3. XX .

43


1887. .
, .
- ,
- . 1912 .,
- (1917).
1917-1924 . -
. 1924-1952
.
(1932). -
( ).
, .
. 1952
. (1955) - , .

, 1931 . ,

- . ,
. (. ).

4 56 .
1935 . (The Vineland Social Maturity Scale), 1
. 30- ,
, . 117 -, . , ,
,
(Social Quotient SQ). ,
, ,
, . , , , . , .

, .
1931 . (AllportVernonLindzey Study of Values).

: , , , , . ,
,
(1960) .

44

1. .


1905 . (). (1927),(1930)
- (1931) .
.
(1930-1931)
.
1933.. (1938-1947). .
- ,
.

(1949-1967).

1960-.
,

.
, , ,
. 63 , -
.
1978 ., . - :
(1978).
, , , .
1987 . ().

, . ,
, , , ,
, , .
, , : (Thurstone Personality Schedule); (Bernreuter Personality Inventory); {Bell Adjustment Inventory); (Rogers Adjustment Inventory);
(HummWadsworthTemperamentScale);
(California Test of Personality); (Mailer Personality
Sketches); (Guilford
Inventory of Factors STDCR). , : ?
, , , .
, ,
- . ,
-
,
,
, ,
, .

,
,

- .


- .
, . -

1.3. XX .

45


1897.().(1922),
( , 1926), ( ,
1952). , . ,
. (- ). (1950). .

, , .
- 1987 .

(1933). : (B1N), (B2S), () (B4D).


, 1960- ., , .
1930- . , , . .
.
(1938) , , . , ,
, , . ,
, , .
,
.
. , .
, ,
, .
,
. , 1930) , , , . , ,
. ,
. (Schwartz, 1932)
. .
(David Levy, 1937) ,
, , ,
. , ,

46

1. .


1893 . -.
, ,
(1927).

,
,
, .
,
1923 . ( , ). 1925 . ,
. 1927 .
. (1928). 1930- .
- .
- ,
. ,
.

1938 . .

- (1935).
- ,
, .
- ,
, .
,
, 1930- . 95-
, 23 1988 .
, .
, -
, -
.


.
1930- .
(Christiana D. Morgan and Henry
Murray, 1935). ,
. 1935 . , ().
, , .
,
.
, 1921 . ,
.
,

1.3. XX .

47

. ,
.
(Samuel J. Beck, 1930) ,
. , (Beck, 1933-1937), (Marguerite Hertz) (Bruno Klopfer). 1936 .
Rorschach Research
Exchange, 1949 . Journal of Projective
Techniques.
.
,
. , .
, , , ,
. (Hertz and Rubenstein, 1939) , (. . , ) (
, ) .
,
: (William Stern, 1937) , (Karl Struve), . , , . . ,
, . , ,
.
,
(Margaret Lowenfeld). (1931)
. ,
. (1939)
, - ,
, . ,
. ,
. , , , ,
(Shakow, Rosenzweig, 1939).
, . , . , , , .

48

1. .


11 1893 . , - . , (
- ).
,
- ,
.
1919 . 1923
. -
-
. . () , ,
- . , , ,
-
, 1939 .

(1947,1948). , 1958 .
- . , 1961
. -
. 1986 .,
25 350 .

-
6 , ( 8 ).
, . , , ,
, . ,
, , , .
1940- .
-(Bender-Gestalt) 1938 . , , .
, . , , .
, (L. . Frank).
1939 .
, , , , - , . ,

1.3. XX .

49


9 1897 . .
.
.
. 1926 . 1930-
1956 . ( 1939
).
- - -
1938 . -- .
1987 .

, .
1938 . .
1
- .
- ,
-- , ,
- . .
(Buros Institute of Mental Measurements),
- (
) 1994 .,
-
.
,
- . 1935 .
(, -).
. . .
1936 . .

, 1990 . 550
30 . .
. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1968), , 2
(item-response theory) . - , .
XX . .
,
.
, 1935 . . 44- .
1936 . 83 . 415
- 4000 .
. . , 1950- .

50

1. .

1905 . - (). (1925),


(1928). 1932-1965 .
.
- .
- ,
- .

, , 1938 . , .
(
)
,

. 1978 .
-.

1.3.4. 1940-
.
.
1940 .
, (Buros, 1941), 325 200 . , .
, . .

(The Army General Classification Test)
- , 10
- . ,
, - , .
( ,
.).
- ,
.
, - . , ,
. , 1944 .
20 .
, , .
,
.
,
, . , ,
, . , .

1.3. XX .

51

1942 . : 1)
, , , 2)
. .
. 425 000 ,
, , , .

, ,
, .
. ,
. , . ,
. ,
, . , , . , ,
, , , .
1942 . , -, .

. , ,
,
.
, ,
.
1949 . , .
200 : 100 100 5 15 .
, , , .
-.

52

1. .

.
20 1903 . 1927 .
. . 1930 . , 1932 .
,
- . -,
- ,
, , - ,
. ,
1984 ., - .
- ,
- .
- MMPI.

( 2 30 ) . , . . , ,
(Stanford Achievement Tests, 1940), R, S
- (Otis Classification Test, 1941).
(Kuder Preference Record, 1942 .) 168 ,
, :
, , , , , , , . .
. - (Myers-Briggs
Type Indicator, I) , 1962 .
(The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory,

I),

. - (Starke
Hathaway, J. . McKinley, 1940,1943). MMPI
, , 550 ,
.

1947 . (Maudsley Medical
Questionnaire). , ,
,
. ,
,

1940- . . . () (Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey, 1949).
- ,
1940-.

1.3. XX .

53


1916 . 1934 ., ,, .
. (1938) (1940).
, .
,
- 1997 .

1940- . ,
. ,
. , , ,
. , ,
, - (.
. ).
.
, .
1939- 1947 . 436 .

(Klopfer Kelley, 1942), .
(S. J. Beck, 1944,1945).
, , ,
. , , , , , , . 1941 . ,
, ,
,
, .
. (1945)
- 24 .
- . . ,
- , ,
, , . ,
,

54

1. .


1911 . .
- .
- . 1938
. (
). .
- -, . 1940 ,
- ,
- . 1948 .
(). -

,
: . . . .
- (Diagnostic
Psychological Testing, 1945-1946). 1960 . .

,
.
, , .
(1947) , , . (1947)
, . , 1949 .,
, . ,
, , , . , , (,
, . .).
,
, . Szondi, 1949 ., ,
.
,
.
, . (Karen Machover, 1948) , . .
.
(1948) , .
, , .
, , . (1948)
. ,
(

1.3. XX .

55

( )
() 12 1902 .; . 1924 . - ,
- 1929.,1935.1930-.

- ,
. .
- 1929
1969 . (1950-1953) (1949-1952).1970-, .
- , .
, .
- ,
- . ,

,
. . 22 1996 . 93 .
, ,
- :
(1949).

, ), 1960- .
(
1990- . ).
,
(1951), , . ,

.
1940- . , . , , . , ,
, . ,
, . . , , -

(
).
,
.
, , , , . 1949 .
.

56

1. .


1923 . ().
- . (
) 1949 . ,
.
- (1957-1959).

(,1960)..
- , 1940- . 1960-1970- .

, - 17 ,
. -
, - (1977). 1965 .
.

1949 . .
(The Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, AT),

, . 16 , . (. ).
- .
. ,
. 1946 . ,

(1935)
- ,
- ,
- ,
, .

1.3.5. 1950- .

. 1951 . 1219 , ,
493 -, - 371
- . MMPI.
, .
1953 . 793 , . . 250
.
1955 .
(WAIS), -
.
- , 1700
16
64 . ,
.
, . : (G), ,
.

1.3. XX .

57


20 1905 . ,
- () .
, 6
. ,

. -
: - (1924),
- (1929),
(1932), (1939).
-
.
- 1927 .
1932 1936 .
. 1937 .
. 1938 .
.
1941 1945 . 1945 .
- . 1973 . . 1974 .
-
- .

(1946). -
(1).

.
, , - ,
XX . 50 400 - ,
,
,
. 2 1998 . ,
, , .

,
(Doppelt shortform, 1956).

, , , , .
- . , 1958 . , , ,
.
, GATB (General Aptitude Test
Bat- tery, 1956),
- .

10 15 .
, ,
. ,
1970- . 25 000
, . , GA , , .

58

1. .


1903 . . (1926) (1927)
, ,
. 1929 . ,
(1931).
1933 .
- , ,
- , .

, . - (1938) (1942). - ,
. 1945. .

,
- . 1972 .,
(1974) .
- (
, 1946) (,1950),

-
. 1996 .

.
.
,
,
,
. , . ( ),
- . 1950 .
16 , 16PF,
.


- . (1953).
- , .

. , , MMPI.
1951 . , , .
968 MMPI .
1956 . , . , MMPI
. MMPI , . .
, ,
1956 . ,
-.

1.3. XX .

59


1918 . (). (1940) (1943)
- .
(1949). .
. 1956-1957 .
- . 1947 .
.
MMPI ( , :
), 1953 .
, MMPI,
- . 1963 . ,
. : intel- lectence (
) origence ( - ).
MMPI, -
.
1990 .


- .
, MMPI ,
- .
MMPI ,
X. - 1956 . MMPI,
- . 18
- ,
.
,
.
(1957)
.
(, , . .), , ( , ). , .
,
1940- . , . Q-
(1953) , .
( ).
,
9 , .
Q-,
- . (1959),
, ,

- . ,
-

60

1. .


1916 . .
(1939),
- (1945).
- . . 1945 1949 .
,
. -
, , - -
,
.
. , ,
,
.
. . . ,
. ,

- . (1963).
1991 .

, . , 1990 .
1955 . . .
, . , , . , , ,
, , .
- , .
- .
,
. -
, .
- ,
, , , - ,
, ,
. - ,

- .


- , ,
-

/- , ,
(
, ).
, -

:
/,

1.3. XX .

61

.
1914 . (). (1937),
(1938), - (1940). .
,
. 1943 .
. . , 1984 .
- .
.
- (1970). 1994 . .


1905 . . ( ). (1926)
-, . 1928 . ( ).
(1930). (
, 1931). - .
(1946-1965). 1950- .
- . ,

(
),

( )
- .
- ,
.
. 1967 . .

/, / . , . 1954 . ( , , ,
).
- , ,
. . (Psychoanalytic Interpretation in Rorschach Testing,1954)
. . (1953),
,
,
- ,
, .

(1950),

.
1950- . , , , . , .
. ,
- .

62

1. .

1920 . . (1941), (1945). , . .


, , ,
. , .
, - .
MMPI. ,
, , .
(1953) - .
- (1962).

, ,


: (Clinical versus
Statistical Pre- diction: A Theoretical Analysis and a review of the evidence, 1954).
-
,

,
, . .

, ,

, .

, -
XX .
, , , ,
(, 1952), , : , , . -
. , .
, . ,
.
,
, .
1953 .
,
. . ,
, , -

1.3. XX .

63


1916 . (). (1934),
- (1937),
(1940). ,
. 1940
1946 . ,
,
,
. -
, 1946 . - ,
1948 . -
(1948-1964).
, .
--
. -
. - ,
(19551957). 1994 . ().


(1954). , - .
1950- .

(DSM,
1952),- .
- ,
- .
- ,
, .

1.3.6. 1960- .
XX . . , ,
. MMPI ,
.
, .
American Psychologist 1965 .
. 1966 .
,
.
,
. . ,
. , , .

64

1. .

, ,
,
. ,
. , ,
-
.
,
, , ( , , ). ,
, ,
.
, .
, .
. , 1940- .,
, 1920- 1930- ., . 1963 . .
, , . ,
. .
. , , , .
. , , , .
- , ,
. ,
,
.
,
, .
, ,

,
- , ,
-
.

, .
- (1972).
- 957 , 1219,
1157. 53%

1.3. XX .

65

, 42 % , 6 % .
(1970),
, , 1940- .
379. 279 , 83 . , . ,
MMPI. , (Edwards Personal Preference Schedule), (Allport -Vernon-Lindzey Study
ofValues), (RaymondCattell's16PersonalityFactors), (California Psychological Inventory), , - .
, , ,
.

, .
.
1967 . (Wechsler
Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, WPPSI).
, ,
, , , ,
. , ,
.


(Bay- ley, 1969), 1262 2
30 - . , ,
.
- ,

- , .
, , , , . .
, , . - (Minnesota Percepto Diagnostic Test), (Frostig Test of Visual Development)
(Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities, ITPA).

1963 . 1967 . 5 18 . ,

66

1. .

. , ITPA,
, .
. ,
. ,
, , . ITPA , . .
: 1) (), 2) () 3) (). :
(); - - (); ().
, WISC WAIS,
.
,
, .
10 , .
, , . , ,
.
, , . ,
, . . , , .
1965 . , , -.
(British Ability Scales, AS) .
- 2,5 17,5 23 ,

-
:

, - ,
,
,
- ,
.
.

- IQ , IQ
IQ .

,
, .
, , -
, . .
(, 1990),
.
1960- .
. . . , , ,

1.3.

XX .

67


1916 . .
(- , 1937),

(,1938.,
1941). ,
, .
. 1963 .
.
.

, .
. , ,

, (, . .). ,
, .
,
.

. 120 .
-1
. . (R. Glaser, 1963).
, , - . , , , , ,
. . . , -
, ,
. - (. ,
).

.

- .
- (1966)
,

1980-
.
(ResearshwiththeLocusofControlConstruct
3 ., 1981-1984).

,
,

(ThePersonalityResearchForm,PRF), 1967 . . , , ,
. , , -
.

68

1. .


1930 . . - (1952),
(1953).
(1956). .
- . .
- ,.
. - .
- ,
- XX .

c, ;
, 440 ,
330 ! , , (The Inventory of Psychosocial Balance, 1963). ,
, , : , - , .
.
, . , 45 -. . . . ,
, , . ,
1964 . 3855 ! ,
- , ,
- .
1960- . ,
. ,
, , .
, , ,
, . , , .
,
.
, , .
, ,
, . -

1.3. XX .

69

. ,
, . -
.
, 1960- .
( 1960-). ,
. , , .
(Standards for Educational Psychological
Testing, 1966) ,
.
. .
Tests in Print, , , ,
.
1960- . ,
(Jensen, 1969)
?{HowmuchcanweboostIQandscholasticachievement), , ,
, 80 % .
- ,
-
- . . ,
-

. ,
, ,
.

1.3.7. 1970-
.
1970- . , , .
, : ,
, , . ,
1960- . (), , .

70

1. .

, .



- .
,
-
, - .
, ,
,

.

-
,
.
{) 1975 . .
, .
, . , ,
. , , . ,
. .

, : ... ... , ( ,
AmericanPsichologist,1975).
,
. , 1974 .
(WISC-R). ,
, . , - .
1971 .
,
. , , G- ,
. , , ,
,
. , , , -

1.3.

XX

71


1883 . . (1907), (1909)
(1923)

- . .
(
1924-1931 ., - 1931-1950 .).
- ,
- , , ,
.

.1951.,1971.

, , , .
-

, .
, 80 %
. {The Structure and Measurement of Intelligenc, 1979),
, , IQ.
.
, , , IQ, . IQ (The Science and Politics of
IQ, 1974). , , . , , , .
: , ,
, - . , , , "". .

.
(Kamin, 1974, . 67).
, , . ,
, , .
.
,
.
, , -

72

1. .

, 50 : , ,
.
, 1970- ., . (1972) . (1977).
,
.
(1978)
28 .
,
.
. , , , ,
. 1970-
1980- . , (DSMIH, DSM-IV).
, , - , -
. , (Holt, 1971), , ,
, , , .

(, 1976). , .
1970- . .
, .
1970- . . . , , ,
. ,
,

1
- .


,
,
.

. ,
1

: , ,
- , , .

1.3. XX .

73

. , 1959 . 44 %
, 24 % 1976 . . .
1974 .
(InternationalAssociationofAppliedPsychology,IAAP) (International Test Commission, ITC),
15 (
23 , ).
ITC. , 1976 1978 .
1970- ., - , ,

.
- (. ).
1970 . - , (Personality
Test and Reviews I), Tests in
Print II. (1975).
1970 .
1975 . ,
,
( ) .
1970- ., (1974).
, ,
.

1.3.8. 1980- .
1940- . ,
, . American Psychologist ( 1981)
, ,
,
.
. , - ,
.

, .

74

1. .

.
,
: MMPI, WAIS, - , , WISC, , , .
1935 1982 . .



-





--


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

()
- (). 15 , . , . ,
, , IQ.
. , , ().
? ,
20- (Spruill, 1987).
-
, , , 16,
15. , . - , IQ-. , ,
,
, , , .
. WAIS (WAIS-R,
1981). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-R)
1989 . 1700

1.3. XX . 75

3 7 3 , , , .
, . (Kaufman
Assessment Battery for Children, 1983)
- . ,

.

- ,
, .
1980- ., ,
- ,

1982 1989 .
(Advances in The Psychology of Human Intelligence). , , , , , , , , , .

, , , , , . . (Human
IntelligenceInternationalNewsletter,1980-1987), , . : ,(AbilityTesting:Uses, Consequences,
and Controversies, 1982). ,
. , .
.
1989 . MMPI-2. MMPI, MMPI-2
.
MMPI-2. , 15 , , ,
( 27 ). .

. MMPI-2 . , MMPI , , .

76

1. .

, : , ,
.
, , ,
. 1930- . 9 % , XX . .
49 %
! MMPI-2 14 % .
. , (, 1980), , ,
, . ,
(. , 1930- . . ),
. -, (1976), , :
- .
- , (1985).
,
. 1983-1984 . 300000 , 2000 .
. 1970- . , , , , .

(Groth-Marnat Shumaker, 1989). , ,
. ,
, , ,
, , . , .
1984 . , ,
(Test Critiques), ,
,
. 1994 .
1985 . - .

1.3. XX .

77

1.3.9. 1990- .
, ,
, , . . , , , .
, , , , , , . .
1992 . 477 (, , 1
, ) .
(28,3 %),
4,6 %
(,
).
- . : 1991 .
(WISC-R), 1998 . ( WAIS-).
.
. . 1990 .
-,
- 4 90 . 1993 .

-
-. -
-

.
, .

, .

1990 .
- .
;
- ,
(
). ,
,
, - .
-
, . 1989 .

78

1. .

(1997). , , , ,
, , ,
. , , , .
. {Fagan Test ofInfant Intelligence,
1992)
{Infant-ToddlerDevelopmentalAssessment,1995).
, , , (Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence, 1994).
() .
"". (The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life,
1994). IQ , , , , ,
. , , , , ,
.
. , , . 1
, PsyLit , 1990- 1996 . (. 1.1).
1992 . MMPI, MMPI-A. , 1989 .,
, 805 815 14 18 . : .
1990- . . ,
PsyLit - , . () , 1300 50 . ,
- . .

1.3. XX .
1.1




MMPI-2
(EPQ)

()
16
(I, II, III)

79

,

1337
869
772
571
539
394
322
287

, .
. ,
. ,
( , .).
.
, . , . . 1993 . , 700 1390 5
16 . , , ,

, .
. , , ,
- .


,

.
, (XIV
1990-, XV 1996-, - , XVI , 1999 .
). 23-
- (1999).
, . 1990 . 64 -
, 45 %
, 32 % . MMPI,

80

1. .

. , .
1990- . , . , 4
1965 . 400 1990 . , ,
( ). 1990- . ,
, . , ,
,
, .
1
1990- .
. 1994 . , . 1990- .
, ,
(1998), 370 ( 1999 .
) Tests in Print (1999).
6- (1995),
(, ), (DirectoryofUnpublishedExperimentalMentalMeasures).
1993 . .
.
,
, .
, 1990- .
. , , (, , 2001, . 12). ,
.
, . , 1994 .
- , . .

1.4.

81

. , ,

,
.

1.4.

,
( ) ,
.
, , , , . . ,
,
. , ,
.
1200 . .
, ,
. , , , . , .
500 ,
. 1700 .
.
XIX . . 1845 .
, , . 1860- .
.

. ,
, , , , , ,
, , .
. . (1857-1934) , .
,
33 000 4-8- , 21 . 1897 .
.
, , ,

82

1. .

(
-0,12) , , .
,
. 1902 .
4-8- 6000 18 , 7 . , .
8000 9 .
, , , . , , .
. .
, 1903 . ,
, .
.
(Educational Psychology). , .
, .
(Introduction to the Theory of Mental
and Social Measurements, 1904). .
1909 .
. , , . , . , .
. , . , , , . . ,
. ,

. . .
- (1909).
(1914).
- 1910-1911 .

1.4.

83

. ( 30 000 ) .
, , .
,
, . . . 1913 .
, . 50 , , .
. 125 .
,
,
. . .
, : .
; X. . ; . . .
- X. . , . . ,
. . - .
. (1913)
.
.

.

(1913).
, ,
,
. . , , . .
, (1918), . , 1916 .
900 000 , 100 000 .
. . 1918 . . .
109 ,
, 84 ,
( 8- ), 25 . -

84

1. .


.
,
.
. , . 1918 .
, . , , . ;
; , , . . ,
, .
10 , , -
,
.

.

. , , .
, . , - . ,
, , , . , - .
, , ( - . ).

1.5.

. XX .
. -

1.5.

85


1860 . ,
- ,
. - .
,
.

. . 1928 .

,' , ,
. - () . - (. . , . . , . . .)
, , ,
.
1917 . . .
. . . 1908 .
, . . .
- , ,
,
-
.

- (.

. ).
, 11
( 11 ,
: - , , ,
,
)
-
.

(, , - ).
-
.


, .
. . ,

.

- ,
- ,
,
,
.
1955 .

, ( ) .
,
, , -

86

1. .


. 1912 . . . ,
, . . , 1
. . . , , , ,
, , .
1920-1930- . .
- .
. . , . . , . . ,
. . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . .
. .
. . . (, 1931),

(, 1929).
. . . , .
, . .
,
... , , 2
. ,
. . , . . , . . , . . .
, (1927),
-

- (I
),
(
- ). ,
, ()
- 4 1936 .
,
? , 65 .
, , ,
. . . ., 1912. . 180.
. .
// . 1928. N 1. . 27.

1.5.

87

, . .,
. , ,

, , ,
, ,
.
, ,
. 6-7 ,
. ,
, .
, ...
,
. () , , , . :
1
. .
, ,
. ? ,
1920- ., , .

- , ,

-
,
.

-
, - .
,
.
-
1920- .
, IQ 7 % ,
. IQ - ,
, .
, 1934 .
, .

88

1. .


1
. ,
- IQ,
, ,
,
.
,

, , , .
2
, , , ""

(. . , 1950).
-
? , ? ,
, , , .
.
.
I (1927), . . : , ? , , , . : . ,
, , .
, , "", , (. . , 1967), .
, , ,
( ) -
, , , . , , ,
( ) . . - , ( . . .)
. . ,
// . 1997. . 18. 3.
. 149-159.
. . . (1930), 1920
1930 25 17 .

1.5.

89

1
.
, . , , ,
. -,
, , , . .
, ,
.
, , , ,
, . 1930- . , .
. ,
1930- ., . .
. . , , , . 1935 . , 1937 . .
(1935-1941) , 2
- .
1960-1970- . , , , . , , . ,
,
, , . . , .
() . 1969 .
. . . .: , 1967. .
156.
1950 .,
. 1950- . ,
, -
; , .

90

1. .

, . ,
1
, , .
, , , . .
. . , , .
,
.
.
,
, -
, .
, ,
, , , , .
. ,
, ,
, . , , . .

, , , . , .
. , ;
,
(. . , 1960,1963).
, , . ., . ., . . // . 1968. 7.

1.5.

91

(: ) . ,
, , . ,
. , , (., . . , 1972)
( ) ( ).
1970- .
1980-. -, ,
,
- , , ,
,
.
-
,
-
,

,
, (. . - ., 1969; . . .
1970-1976; . . , 1969-1974; . . ., 1971-1974; . .
, 1971-1975; . . .,
1974-1975 ).
1
, , ,
, , - .
,
. 1960- 1970- .
, .
1970- . , . , , , (. . ,
1975; . . ., 1976; . . . . , 1978; . . , 1979).

-

,
- .
-
2
.
1960 1978 . -
. . . . . , 1968 . , .
., .: : / . . . . .: , 1976;
- .

92

1. .

1980- . 1991 .
,
, , .
, , .
,
, , , .
, ,
,
. , -, ,
, , , ,
, , , ,
. ( ) ?
, , , ,
, - , .
, .
. , , . ,
-
,
, , .
-

- ,
(. . ,
1991). ( ),

(. . , 1985; . . , 1976; .). ,
. . , - , ,
, .
, (-

1.5.

93

) , ,
1
- . . .
, ,
() , , . -
, , (!) . ,

. ,
, ,
,
, .
, , ,
,
,
. 1980- . , .
. . (1980), . . (1982), . .
. (1983), . . (1984), . . (1989), . .
(1989). , . 2
3
, - ,
. , ,
, -, .
, "" - , ,
... ... (. . , 1980).
,
(. . ., 1983; . . . . , 1985;
. ., 1988; . . ., 1988; . . , 1991 .).
- 1980- .
-

,
-
- .
(
) ,


.
. . : // . 1991. . 12. 5. . 3-17.
/ . . . , . . . : - . -, 1987.
. ., . . - . :
- , 1989.

94

1. .

1980- . , . ,

, : , , . ,
, , , .
, XX .
-
, , ,
. ,
-
- , ,
- , .
,
,
. , , . , ,
( ) ,
.
, .
,
,
. -
, , , .
,
1
2
, , - . , , , . 1990- .
. , ( 4/43, 1999) ,
(51 % !),
,
.
, , , ,
- .
. : / . .; . . . . : ., 1994.
/ . . . . --: , 1996.

95

- .
, .
; , , - .
, , . ,
, ,
1960- . , .
, ,
, , ,
,
.

,
,
, .
. ,
: , . , .
. , . , .
XIX XX ., .
XX .
, , , , . ,
, 1920- 1930- .
-
.
-
.
, . , XX . , , ,
. , , -
, .

96

1. .


, , .
.
XX . . 1936 . , -. 1960- .
- . .
, , .
,

. -
-


-
.
.
, ( ) XX ., .

1860
1879

1879
1884

1885
1888
1888



. .

1890
1896
1896
1897
1897


.
.

.


()


,


9
7

,1904

1904

1905

1906
1909
1912
1916
1917
1918
1921

1925

1927
1931

1935



()

1936
1938
1938
1939
1939
1940
1941
1941
1942
1950
1952
1953
1954


()




-








-











, ,


.



,

-
-





16 (16 PF)
(DSM-I)

,

,

98

1. .

1954

1955

1956

1957
1957

1963
19631970
1966
1966
1968

1969
1974
1978
1987
1989

1993

1998

.


,


. , . , . ,
.
.
,
,




()

,




. ,

(ITC)
( 1936 .)
:


-:
MMPI-2

13-

2 1

.
, .
..
,
. .
, , , . ,
: , .
. .

, ,
- (),
, ,
, -
()

.

-


. -
, -

-
.

2 . 1 .
,
( )
-
, .

, . , ,
.
1921 . . ,

100 2.

.
. ,
, , .
. . (1966) ,
(,
1930- ., ,
-
1
- , "" ).
- , . ,

-
.
, ,
, , , , ( . . 7).
.
. 2
. , ,
( ), (, 1961; , 1966 .).
, ( )
- , (, 1949 .).
. WEBSTER:
3
. : 4
-
.
, , , .
- 1970- .
, ,

(. - , 1982).
1960-1970- .:
Heis R. Psychologische Diagnostik: Einfuhrung und Uberblick // Handbuch der Psychologie. Gottingen. 1966. - Bd. 6. - S. 7-16.
A Supplement to Oxford English Dictionary. London: Oxford of the Charendon Press, 1982. P.
880. Websters. - Springfild, Massachusetts: G and Merriam Co., 1981. - P. 1833.
. .: , 1983. . 2.
. 389.

2.2. 101

(Anastasi, 1968; , 1982, 2001), Essentials ofPsychological Testing (Cronbach, 1960),


Test Theory (Magnusson, 1967),

- Theory andPractice of Psychological Testing (Freeman, 1963).


-

(
History of Psychological Testing; DuBois, 1970).

- .
, 2000 . -
{Encyclopedia ofPsychology. and Oxford University
Press;


) , .
,
:
;
, ;
, ,
.
, ,
. , -
,
,
, , . .

2.2.

1, , , 1960- .
. . ,
. ,
. ,
. , , , , .
, ,
,
, , ...
, ...
, -

102

2.

, <...>, (, ,
. .) (, 1968).
,
. , , ,

.
1960- 1970- .

. (, , ) , ,
, , . ,

- . . . . 3.
(1976): -,
- ... -,
, ,
, - ( . . .) ,
- , . ..
, - - ,
, - ,
.
,

-


(, 1981, . 23).
- ,
,
, - - (
1
) ( , . 5) .
, . . , , , . . ,
( : / . . . , . . . .: - , 2000)
- , . . , .
- ,
-
-
- .
.

2.2.

103

, , . ,
, (). ,
. ,
()
1
. , ,
, ,
. , ,
. ,
,
. ,
. . ( 1 9 8 2 ) , ,
-
( )
.

80- .
. , (1985) , ,
. , , .
, .
,
. . . . (1987), , . , ,
. :
2
, ?
,
. , (. 1.5).
,
, ,
, (1996).

104 2.

. . (1996) ,
.
, , -
,
.
( -
),
()
. ,
, ,
, , . ,
:
, , -
.

, . , -
, ,
.
2
, , ,
,
( ).
-

-
- (-
,
, . .),
- , ,
- . ,
- ,
.
, . ,
.
, , , .

2.3. 105

2.3.

,
. , , .
,
, , , ,
. .

2 . 3 . 1 .

,

. XIX XX .
-

1
.
.

- , ,
,
2
.
,
. , . , .
,
(Allport 1949; Anastasi, 1958; ). , ,
, ,
.
:
( ) (. . , 1996). ,
() .
, , , .
. ( ) .
.
.
Stern W. Uber Psychologie der Individuellen Differenzen. Ideen zu einer Differentiellen Psychologie.
Leipzig Barth, 1900.
HofctatterP. R. Differetielle Psychologie. - Stuttgard, 1971. - S. 34.

106 2.

, .
( ) ( , ),
, . , ( )
,
(Anastasi, 1958).
,
, .
, , . , . , (, ,
) . ,
, .

2.3.2.
, ,
, . , (1734), . .
.
, (, , . . , . , , ).
1
XX ,
.
.
, (. . 3).
, , .
-
. -
, ,
2
. , ,
Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary. Edinburgh Chambers, 1972.
- . - (,

2.3.

107

.
, () . , ,
, , . , ,
,
, , .
, 1920-1930- .

,

- ,
.

, - ,
,

-
, , - ,
.
-.
, ,
.

2.3.3.
1970- . ,
. (psychological assessment).

, .
, - The Assessment of Men COffice of Strategic Services, 1942). 1953 .

()
. .
,
,
, ,
.
, () ( , ,
. .). , )
. 20- . XX .

108 2.

. ,
, , , , , . . , . , (
. .).
, ,
. . ,

, , , : .

, -
, , .
(
) , .
.

2.4.

. , ?
, , , . ,
.


() .

() , , .
,
()
, , .
,
.
() (. . , 1976 .). ,

2.4.

109

, .
-, ,
( ) . ,
1
.
,
, , ,
. , () . , , .
( , ,
2
. .) .
, , ,
- , (
- ),
(,

).
,
-
.
.
, , ( . ).
, (). ,
.


(. 2.1).
,
. : (), .
. ,
. .
,
.
. . 3.

110

2.

. 2 . 1 .

(- ) / () .
,
, () , ,
.

- , ,
() .

, , ,
, .
, ,
.
, .

2.4.

111

,
.
, ()
,
. . .
, : . () , . , , ,
. , , , .
( ). ,
,
(
) .
-
- ,
.
, /
, - . ,

:
, -
- ,
1
, , ,
- , ,
.
.
, ,
-.

- ,
, ,

- , , ,
, - -
- ,
- .
, , ( . . 6). : -, -
- (. , 1964).
. - , , , ,
.

112 2.

. 2.2. ( )

(
, -.
), ,
.
, ,
.
-
.
, . 2.2.
, . , , , . ,
, .
.
, ,
,
.

2.5.

- , , . modus operandi . ,

2.5.

113

, . , , (), . , ,
, .

2.5.1 .

(. test , , ) , ,
- , (
)

-
.

, , , .
. . (1972),
(. testa ). , .
:
1) , ,
, ,
;
2) 1
.
XIX . .
,

, - ,

.
.
(,
.), . , . (. ) .
( ). ,
? , 1970- .
,

. 1877.

114 2.

, .
.
-,
.
,
, , ,
, , .
.
-
- . (
- )
- , , ,
.
, , ,

.
, : , ; ;
, , . .
, ()
.
, . .

2.5.2.
. . ( 1960- .)
, .
,
, .
.

(1960- .). ( , , ,
- . .).
.

2.5.

115


, .
: , , ; , (, 1985).
.

-
. -

.

,
,
.

.
( 1970- .) , ,
.
,
. .
, . ,
.
,
, .

XX . , .
, .
1980- .,
, .
. , 1960- .
(!), -
, 1
, 1930- . .
..// . .: , 1967.

116 2.

, - 1980- ., . 1990- .
(. . .) , , -
,
. ,
. -
(, ,
) , , . . .
, , :

, ;
;
;
,
;
;
, , , () ;
;
- , ;
;
( ),
;
-, . .
, , (, )
;

,

2.5.

117

( , );
( ), ;
,

(, - -
, , );
, , (
);
;
( ), ;

, ;
.

, (1986) (. 2.3)
, , , ,
.
,
. , 30 % (. . , 1993),
1
5 % , .
, , .

, ,
.
, , , . ,
- (
- ).

118 2.


. 2.3.

. , .
.
,
. , , ,
. ,
, (I) . , , , .
( , )
( , 1989; .). , .
, , ( : , ). ( , ,
, , , ),
. .
,

2.5. 119

,
. , , -
, ,
, .

. , -,
. ,
,
, ,

.


, , ,
, .

,
. . - 100- . 65,42 ,
60,42 . ,
5 %(!) .
, , , ,
- .


. ( ) ,
. , , .
,
.
-

.
, -

120 2.

. ,
.
. ,
.

2.5.3.


1
. , , , , ,
, ,
- .

, :
- , (
)
,
, ,
(Cattell, 1957).

- -

- ( ) ,
. , , ,
. , - , (Eysenck, 1993),
, . , , , , .
,
, , , , ,
, , , . , , , . , , ,
-
. ,
, , ,
- .'

2.5.

12
1

, , .

. XIX XX . , - . ,
. , , , .
, . .
( !) .
, " "
" ", "" "" (. . , . . , 1977).
,
. , ,
.
. , , d

. ,
, . ,
, , ,
. ,
- , ,
-
.
, - .
-,
.
-
. , -
,
, , , . , .
, , . -

, (

122 2.

) , , .
, , -
, . . . , .
.
, , , ,
- .
, , ,
. , . . , ,
. ,
.
, , .
-
. ,
. ,
( ,
,
. .). . ,
. () . ,
, . ,
( ) .
, .
, , (
) .
.
,
, . -

2.5. 123

, ,
. ,
- .
- :
?
, , , .
, .
.
.
. , . , ,
. ,
, .
. (Gerald,
1989), , . , , .
, ,
. : ,
, , , -,
,
, .

. , ,
. . .
. , , , .
, , (, 1992). ,
. ,
, , , . , -

124 2.

, . ,
.
( !) ,
, .

2.5.4.

(1970- .) . , , ,
, . ,
. ,
,
, ,
- ,
.
- , , ,
, -.

- ,
,

,
,
. ,
- .
,
.
, , , :

;
;'
;
;
.

, , , . -, ,
, , , .
,
- . .
.
:

2.5.

125

1)
;
2) , ;
3) ;
4)
(. . , 1977).

. ,
.
, .
,
.
1
. , ,
, ,
. , , ,
, ,
, (Campbell, 1980, . 307). ,
, ,

, .
, ,
.
. ? (), (, 1983).
, MMPI ,
. . , , . .
, , , ; , .

126 2.

,
. , . ,
.
, .
, : 1)
(), ,
; 2) ; 3)
.

.
.
, . :
,
.
. ,
.

2.6.
()
. () , , .
.
, , , . . ,
, , , , , ,
-
(. . ,
. 3. , 1976).
- , (Rosenzweig, 1949; .).
, ,
- . -

2.6.

12 7

,
. - , .
(Reykowski, 1966), .
1. , , . . ,
.
2.
, .
3. ,
, .
4. ,
.
. : (, ) , . . , , .
, , , , . , .
, ,
. ,
, .

: .
,
: , .
,
. , ,
.
.
. , , ,
. , .

128 2.


( ), .
.
: ( , , ) ( ). ,
, .
,
.

,
, ,
, . ,
.
, .

, . , , , (Watson, 1963; Sanocki, 1978; .).
,
.
- . , .
- -

, ,
, ,

; -


;

, :
- ;

, (Le- wicki, 1969, 81).


, - (. . ,
) , () .

2.6.

12 9

(Shapiro, 1957; Eysenck, 1960; .) , ,


, , .
, . -
, ,
. .
, , ,
( . ).

. . ( 1 9 6 9 ) ,
, ,

- .

,
.
, - .

-
- , , ,
-
. ,
- ( )
-
. ,
, ,
,
.
() . . : , (. . , 1978; .).
, , ( ) ( ) .
, ,
, , .
,
, , . ,
, .

130 2.

, , , (Reykowski, 1966).
1
,
,
, . :
,
-
,
- , .

, , . . (Lewiski, 1969) ,
,
, .
, : , ,
, .
3. (Plewiska, 1980), . , . :
(, ,
; );
(,
, , ; ,
, );

,
.
, :
, ;

,
, ;
;
, ,
- , ,
,
.

2.7. 131


;

.

. . , , .
, ,
(WISC-R),
, .
, ,
' , , .
, ,
(WAIS-R) ( ), . , 8,8 % .
81 % !
, , ( ) , .

2.7.


. ,
, . , ,
() , .
(, , , .). , .
1
148 .
, .
( . idea , grapho ; ., ., . . . .
- . . , 1987).
( . idios , grapho
).

132 2.

. ,
, , ,
,
. ,
(),
.
, , () . , , ,
.

, , .
, . (
) . (, , )
.
.
1
- . . . .


, . , (
.). ,
(Hubert, 1988; .) .
, .
, , . , , , .
, . ,
, ,
.
.
(. , 1982, . 2, . 149).

, .
,
. . . . . . 5- . - . 29. - . 318.

2.7. 133

, . (Mischel, 1968, . 13-36). , , , . , , ,


.
,
1960- ., ,
.
, . ,
( ) . . (1981),
, , .
, , , , -
, .
(Mischel, 1968; .). , .
, , ,
, ,
, 10,2 % (, 1986). , ,
?
. , :
() () .
, ,
, , ,
1
:
, ,
"" ,
.

, ,
(), .
"", ,
, . ,
, . , ,
, .

134 2.

, , , (Mischel,
1977, . 248).
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
( , . 246).
, ,

, , . .
, , , .
, , . , , ,
,
, .
, , ,
.

(, 1986).
.
,
, .
, , (, 1981, . 63). . . ,
, ,
( , . 62).


( , . 62). . ( ). ,

2.7.

135

.
, (),
, , , . . . ,
-
, ,
.
. .
,
, . , ,
. . , . ,
, () . , -
, .
, ,
-.
-.
,
. -
-. (
!) ,
. , . () , . , ,
, . , ,
.
,
, , ,
. :
.

, . . , -

136

2.

,
. ( ., 1980; .). , (
), , .
, .
. , , ,
. ,
: . ,
, (, 1985,
. 37). , , (, 1986; .). ,

, , , ,
, , .
, , .
. . . (, 1984),
, , , ,
.
.
, () . ?
, , ,

. - , . , ,
. <, ()
-
.
-
. ( , -

2.7. 137

) , ()
.
, .
,
( , . .). (
) ,
, : . , , .

, , , .
. ,

. , , , . ( ) ,
, . :
,
, , .

.

,
, . , .
, ,
. . ,
. , . . , (-, , -,
, -, ),
, -, , -, -

138 2.

, -, , . . .

- -

- ,

. -
-
,
- .




: - ,

- ;
. ,

(. . , 1986). ,
,
. , , .

, , (, .) ,
.

.
: , .

1
,


.
,
. -
(. . ) .
( )
- ,

.
. (Merton, 1947)
. , .
. , , . , , ().
( ), ,
(, )
,
.

2.8.

139

.

.

2.8.

, , .
, , ,
, ( ). , .

2.8.1.


(, , . .) , . , . ,
, .
,
, .

,
- ,
.
-
,

. ,
, .
-

- .

,
,
.
- .



. , , ,
, ,
, .

. . . (1990)
: -

140 2.

(, ); 2) ,
(, - ); 3)
(, ); 4) , (,
). ,
,
.
(
) - ,
. ,
.

.
, , .
, . , , .
;
-
;
, .
, ,
(Meehl, Rosen, 1955).

(), .
, . ,
, . . (1982), , ,
, : , 5 %
, 5 %.
,
, 0,50. ,
,
,
, , (, 1982, . 1, . 157-158). ,

2.8.

14 1

, , ,
, .
,
() . , , , , , ,
- , .


, , .

, ,

- ,

.
,
.
, . . . , ,
(, ).
,
(Cronbach and
Gleser, 1965, p. 146). , .
,
, . ,
, . .

2.8.2.

, ( , ) . ,
: , , , 1
, , .
, . . .
()
, , ,
. .
- , ,
- , .

142

2.

.
2.4.

.
.
. (hl, 1954), , , ,
, ( 20 ,
).
, , , , (Barendregh, 1961). , ,
, , (. 2.4).
, , . . . , -, , .
, , , . , , . ,
. . , , ,
, (Holt, 1978; , 1986; .). . , - , (Holt, 1978).

2.8.

14 3

,
.
, , . , . .
, , , ().

, .

2.8.3.
. . (Sandberg and Tyl e r , 1962)
- (. 2.5).
. , ,
. . ,

. 2.5.

144 2.

. , , .
, ,
. . . ,
,
, (,
1983, . 5, . 259).
,

, , . , - , , , (,
).

. . . . , , ,
, . . ,
.
, , , .
, ,
, .
, ,
. ( ) , . , ,
, , , . .,
, .
.
,-
( . . .), , , , ,
(. , 1981, . 49).
,
, , , .

2.8.

14 5

, . . ,
,
,
- . . . .
(1936).
( ) ,
- ,

. . .
(1983) ,
- . ,
, ,
, ( , . 317).
- ,
- ,
( , . 314).
,
- , , .
- ,
.
. , ,
:
, . -, , , , , ,
(, 1983, . 318).

, ,
, , ,
- .
,
- .
,
, ,
- ... (,
1983, . 318).
, - . .
. . , . , , ,
. , . ,
, , , (, 1983, . 313).

14 6

2.

, .
,
. .
. . , ,
, , ( , . 320).
.
,
. , . , ,
,
.
, . , "
", , , ,
(, 1981, . 50).
, -
, . , ,
. ,
, . , ,
. -

-.

, .

, , , . . . . , , , ,
,
, ( , . 321).
, . . , , .
, (, 1981).

2.9. 147

2.9.
,
,
. . ,
,
.
. , ,
. (, )
,
.
, , ,
. - , , , ( . . , . , 2001).
, .
,
, ,

- .
-



, , .
- ,

. -
.
, ( ,
,

.
-

.
-
).

. .
,
, .
, , , . .

148 2.

, .
, , .
, , , , , . ()
, ,
. , .
,
,
. ,
.
. , . , , ,
, (
-
1
).
,
.

, , , , , .

,

- , ,
-
.

, ,


-


.
,
, .
. . .,
. . - . .: -, 1999.

149

, . , .
,
, ,
.

, . . . , ,
, ,
, . . .

-
-
. ,
(),
.
-
,
(), - , , , . , .

, . , ,
, , .


, , , ,
, ...
. .

, . ,
.
. , .

, , , , , ,
. ,

.
,
, , . .

,


16 .
,

- ,
- :
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

;
;
;
;
.

, , ( . . 2), -

3.1. ( ) 151

, ,
.
, .

: , (Burisch, 1984).

- , .

- , , ,
- .
, -

,
.
- ,
.
.
.
,
, , , -
,

, -

( ).

3.1
.

( )

, ,
. .
.
.
, , ,

- , ,

.
, .
. (Rust, Golombok, 1988) , , ,
. , .
,
. , , , . , , ,
. . , -

15 2

3. : ...

,
.
4
7 . , . , , (. 3.1).

, 16
25 (, 4x4,4x5,5x4 5x5)
, , .
, , ,
. ,
. ,
. 3.2 (Rust, Golombok, 1989), , , , 40-%- , D 10-%-.
, , C D 25-%- .
- ,
- ( )

(
) - 100 %.
, .
, ,
. ,
, - . ,
:
, ,
,
, -

,
. ,
-
20 , 10 . ,

, . -

3.2.

153

50 % , .
, , . (Rust, Golombok, 1989) ,
, 80 (. 3.2).
3.2

,
,

(25%)
5(25%)
(25%)
D (25%)
-

40%

40%

10%

D
10%

20

20

20

20

32

32

80

,
, , . ,
25 % 32 , 8 25/100x32 = 8.
, .

3.2.
, . , :
, . . ()

.
, ,
. , ,
. , .
, . , ? -

154 3.

...

: -
?.
, , ,
, . . , , . , , .
?,
,
(, !).,. . ,
?.
,
, . ,
, .
, ,
. - . , , : ,
1
. (), , . . , , .
( , , , )
, , , .
, ,
, , . .
- , , . ,
.
,
. , .
, , , . .
,
, , . . 5.

3.2.

155

. ,
1
.
, ,
, . .

,
.
,
, , . , ( ) : , .

, , .
, ,
, .
: 1)
; 2) ,
; 3)
.
, , . , , . , . ,
, , . , , ,
.
(
- ), ,
- ,
- , ,
,
- . ,
,
. ,
, . ,
-

156 3. : ...

, (. )
.
,
,
, , ; .
. . , ,
, . .
(
, ),
,
, .
, , , .
, .

3.3.
, , , () , ,

. , , , ,
, ,
. .
, .
, .
, . , ,
, ,
. , , .
.
1. .
2. 1012 .
3.
.

3.4.

157

4. , . . . ,
1.

2.

3.

5. , , , .
6. , .
.
7. , .
. (
, ).
( ) ,
(), , , .

3.4.

, ,
.
.
, , ,
- ,


, .
,
- , ,
,

- . ,
- - .
, -

.


,
.
,
-
, - ,
, , . -

.
,

158 3. :

...

, , . , - , .

3.5
, ,

(
- ) . ,
(. 3.3),
(, b, , d . .) , (1, 2,3,4, 5 . .)
- . ,
,
, - ( )
, - ,
. -
()
().
3.3

1.
2.
3.
4.

1
0
1

1
1
0
0

0
0
0
0

1
0
1

1
1
1

4
2
3

0
1

1
1

2
2

13

5.

1
0

, , 1
. , ( ) ,
. t
0,25 0,75, 0,5 . , 0,25, , ,
; ,
,
: " "?.
, () , ().

3.5 1 5 9

, 0,75 ,
. . 3.3
: () 3/5 - 0,6; (b) 2/5 - 0,4; () 0/5 - 0; (d) 3/5 - 0,6 () 5/5 = 1.
, () ()
.
, , , . . -
, ,
.
(, ) , , , .
. , , . . , 0,2. .
(,
, , -
).
,
.
, .
, , , +1 - 1 .
, , ,
. :

r ; X ; Y
() ; ; 2 .

, : ,

.
. .

160 3.

...


. , ( 20-30 !) . ,
,
.
, . . .

- -

XY

. , .
() .
.
, .
1980- ., , , . (item response theory, IRT). , ,

3.6.

161

. .

- ITR
- . , , ITR
, ,
.
- . , 1994; . . , 2001; .).

3.6.

,
.
.
-
- ,

1
, - ,
. ,
, ,

, . ,
. - .
, ,
.
,
- ,
- -
, .
- 6
(, 1994).
. 6
.
.
302 3 . . ,
0,872, ,
, : 1) ; 2) ; 3)
. ,
,
.
, 0,7. ,
.
.
(, 1994), , ,
- ,
.

162 3. : ...


,
. , , ,
, .


- ( ),
- .
- ,
.


. , , . ( ) .
:

, ;
- .
,
0,80, :

,
.

( 200 ) . , .
.

3.7.
, ,

.
.
, . (Spearman, 1904).
, . , . -

3.7.

163

, . . , . , .
- , . .,

- ,
- .
, , , ,
( ), (), . - , , , .
( ).
. (Aiken, 1996).
90 (1 , 5 ) 11 :
, , , , , , , , , .
,
(. 3.4) , ,
, , , .
, , . . , (
) +1,00 .
,
, . 11 , ,
. ,
: 1) , ; 2) , (. . 3.4).
, , () . , () ,
,
.

164 3. : ...
3.4
11

10
9
i
4
7
8
3
6
2
5
1
1,000 0,727 0,424 0,573 0,343 0,294 0,458 0,200 0,425 0,091
2
0,727 1,000 0,304 0,620 0,287 0,258 0,363 0,075 0,459 0,115
3
0,424 0,304 1,000 0,470 0,510 0,080 0,691 0,206 0,304 0,129
4
0,573 0,620 0,470 1,000 0,336 0,195 0,390 0,061 0,528 0,026
5
0,343 0,287 0,510 0,336 1,000 0,171 0,638 0,374 0,203 0,243
6
0,294 0,258 0,080 0,195 0,171 1,000 0,108 0,227 0,159 0,490
7
0,458 0,363 0,691 0,390 0,638 0,108 1,000 0,218 0,314 0,108
8
0,200 0,075 0,206 0,061 0,374 0,227 0,218 1,000 00,85 0,524
9
0,425 0,459 0,304 0,528 0,203 0,159 0,314 0,085 1,000 0,114
10
0,091 0,115 0,129 0,026 0,243 0,490 0,108 0,524 0,114 1,000
11
00,78 0,127 0,112 0,022 0,244 0,430 0,065 0,421 0,187 0,611

11
0,078
0,127
0,112
0,022
0,244
0,430
0,065
0,421
0,187
0,611
1,000


1
(principal axis), .
. 3.5 , , , , , . , , 11 .
, 1 A 0,754; - 0,271
- ; 0,250 .
. ,
- 1 :
2

(0.754) +(-0,271) +(0,250) =0,704.


, 70,4 % 1 .
- .
, , , .
, ,
, ,
. , , , , .
,
. ,
, : . / . .; . . 3. .
.: , 1974.

3.7.

16 5

3.5

', ' ' . ,

, ,
,
- , .
- ,

- .

- ()
.

, - ,
().

, 0,50 .
1 (), 2 (), 4 () 9 () '.
, . ,
': 6 (), 8 (), 10 ()
11 (), , '
. , : 3 (), 5 () 7 ( ); . , .
SPSS

(Statistical Package for the Social Sciences).

166 3. : ...

, ,
, . . ,
.
, .

3.8.
.
.
, , .

,
- .

, -
- -

.
- ,

- ,
, -
, : -

.

, . . , ,
, , . , ,
?

, , . , , 10 , . .
, ,
. , , , . ,
, .
,
. ,
, -

3.9. 167

,
.
, , . . .


. , - .
, , .
, .
(
!), , ,
. , , ()
, , , , , , .
, , , .
,
, . (Cronbach & Meehl,
1955), ,
. , . ,
:
1) ; 2)
. ,
, ( . . 2).
, - , .
,
, .
, .

3.9.

, , , , .

168 3. : ...

. , , . , .

.
.
, 500 . . , , , 10 ,
, - , .
, , ,
. , , , . .
.

.
, ,
:

SD ; X ; ; .
,
,
,
- .



-
:

(- ) .

-
, - z-.
-
-
. :

, , ,

3.9.

169

.
, , , .
, ,
, .
.
. , , .
, ,
. , , (X), 0, (SD),
1. , , , 50 % . ,
1, 16 % , + 1 84 % .
, , 10
50, T- ,
50, , 60 . . , , 1
.

, , () .
(. . 4), 5 , , . . 3.1.
:
16
PF
. 16 PF(16
)
-

. 50

. ,
,
, - ,
, - .
,
,
., ., . ., . . - . .: ,
1999, ., . / .
. .: , 1976.

170 3. : .

. 3.1.

. (!) . ,
, , , , .
(!) , 16PF . :

3.9.

171

. . . . (1990), . . , . .
- . . (1987), , . .
(1997).
- ,

. ,
16PF ,
- , .
1
,
, 16PF.
16PF. 227
(135 92 ) 16 51 . 28 . ,
, (, ,
).
, . , ,
16PF, , , , :

a ; r ; S

j- ; .
. 3.6 , ( ). , . N , , (
). ,
F () H (), , . ,


, . ,
/ .
, , 16PF, .

.

172

3. : ...
3.6

,

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

12
13
14
15

F
G

I
L

N
0

Q1
Q2
Q3

Q4

0,335699
0,293849
0,210113
0,640528
0,403974
0,727452
0,521693
0,172452
0,138720
0,005232
0,443746
0,002209
0,379002
0,452439
0,486635

, .

scree-plot (. 3.2).
( ) ,
, , . -


. 3.2. ,

3.9. 173

, , .
VARIMAX c .
. SPSS Windows ( 5.0). , 0,3.
:
,
10 %
. ,
, -.
, , , . , , (-). , , 1,2 187 .
.
, . , 7 . ,
. .
1. .
2. , .
3. , , .
4. - - ( G ).
5. ( Q2 ).
6. , .
7. , .
, , . , , , (G, Q3 Q2) , .
,
, (, 1997). .
. 3.7 ( , 0,3).

174 3. : ...
3.7

, , . . 3.8.
3.8

, , .
,
. ,
0,6-0,8.

3.9.

175

1
(. 3.9,3.10).
3.9

22 7
( )


,
, ,

- -

,

3.10


22 7 ( )

,
, . . ,
. ( 1 10,
5,5 2).

176 3. : ...



. , ,
.

, , , . , , , -

( ) . , , , , , . .
,
.
, , .
.
,
, , , . , , (), , , ,
.
,
, , ,
-.

. . .
...

(),
.
, .
,
1, ,
, . ,
,
, .

1920-1930- . ( . , 1930,
1920-1930- . 25
17 , ).
,
. 1930- .
(. . 1)
.
, , -

178 4.

1970- . , , . , ,
, , ,

.
, .

. ?
,
. .
1. , , G (. 1 , ceoa . ).
2. ,
(h) .
3. .

, IQ
, , . . . .
.
? , ,
? ? .

4.1
.

1921 .
.

1. ?
2. ?
3. ?
. ,
, ,
.
,
1981 . . . ,
. , . , . .

4.1.

179

, , , .
1
.

, .
.
, .
, ,
.

. , , , (Boring, 1923).
. ,
, ,
. , , , , , ,
, , . . , : , IQ , ,
....
, .
: , , . .
, ,
,
. ,
, , , ,
(, 1995),
, , . , , , ,
- . ,

.


, - : ? , ,
,
.
, , , , ( 0,50,
,
, , .

180 4.

, ). , , , ,
, (,

). ,
, .
, , ,
, , .
.
,

, .
,
,
. , , ,
.

. (Piaget, 1960)
, . (Vernon, 1960) ,
, .
, . , ,
, . , ,
(. . , 1940, . 537).
,
, , . .
,
. , .

,
,
.

- ,
,

4.2. ,

181

, , , .
-
(, 1 9 8 2 , . 1,
. 388).
,
. (
, )?

4.2 . ,

,
. ,
: (intelligence tests)
- (mental tests).
, (special
abilities tests attitudes tests), (general intelligence
tests) (general abilities
tests). -
-
,
,
.


:
(- ,
) (,
).
,
:
(, ) (, ).
- ,
- (. ).

,
.

, ,

,

.
,
, : , ,
, . , ,
, ,
, , , . ,
,
(
- , ).

- , .

182 4.

4.3.
, , ,
XIX XX . ,
, , , , .
, ,
, .
.

4.3.1
.

,
,
.
,
, . ,
.
, .
- (v: ed) - (k: m) . : , - ,--, .
(. 4.1).
,
, . - ( 4.2). ,
, .

. 4 . 1 .

-G

4 . 2 .

184 4.

4.3.2.

, ,
, , .
( Crossroads in the Mind of Man: A
Study of Differentiable Mental Abilities Kelly, 1928),
- . ,


.
,
: - , ,
, .
- ,
, ,
- , .
,

. ,
,
. , , ,
. . 4.1 9 3 , .
4.1

: ,

4.3. 185

, ,
- ()

, - . .
,
(. . 4.2). . 4.2
, 1, 2, 4, 5 ,
3 6 .
4.2

9 , 7
:
V ( , );
W ( , . .
- );
N ( );
S (
- ,
- );
(
);
(
, );
/ (R) (
,
- ).
,
. , , (IQ), . , ,
.
( , ) , . ,
-

186 4.

, .
, , , .
G. .
. ,
, .
1940 . . ,
. , G . , , ,
( 0,35).
, . .
.
, . ,
, , , . .

4.3.3.

, (Guilford, 1967) , .
,
. , ,
- (), (.
4.3). ,
- :
(), (),
,

- (D), ,

- (N)
- ().
. , ,
(F), (5), () ().
, .
, (U), ( ) ,
(R), (S), () (I). ,
-

4.3.

/ 4.3.

120 (5x4x6) , , ,
.
, , CFU ( , ; ; , ).
- CBI ( ;
- ; , ,
, ).
-
88

.
, , (),
.
. , 18 % -0,10 +0,10 (8677 48140 ), 24 % (r = 0). ,
. , 76 % r > 0, , . ,
.

188 4.

,
, , /
, .
, , , , . ,
,
, , , ,
, .
,
.

4.3.4.

, (Eysenck,
1979), , . , .
(. 4.4),
: (, , . .), (, . .),
, ,

(

- ). , ()
-

( . ).

. -

.


. 4 .4 .

4.3. 189

. .
, ,
g- , , , , , , IQ
- , .
- ,
, (Eysenck, 1979,
. 193).
, ,
, , .

4.3.5.

,,, (Cattell, 1971). , G ,
(gf) (gc). - , ,
, G . gf
gc , : .
, , . : . , , , , .
, , , , .
,
. , , .
, , ,
- , ,
.
1. ( )

. , , ,
.
-
- . .
2. ,
.
-

190 4.

. 4.5.

, , ,
, . , , , , .
3. -
.
, ( ), , . .
, - .
.
,
- . ,
. ,
.
. 4.5. ,
,
-
.

, -

4.3. 191

, , , . . ,
- ,
.

-.
(,
gf - ).
, ,
. , ,
-.
- , ,
, .
.
,
. ,
, , ,
- , , .


,
,
, ,
, ,


( 3- ), , .



, . -, , . ,
.
, . ,
.
,
.
, :
.
- . ,
. ,

, 70 %, 90
%.

192 4.

(3 . , 1975) , . ,
. , , .
.
, , .
(Horn, 1968) , (Guilford, 1980), ,
,
( 14 61 ), , . , ,
.
, , , ,
. ,
, , . ,
: :
(Fluid and crustallized intelligence: two fanciful concepts, 1980).
. ,
, . ,
, ,
.

4.3.6.

, , . .
.
,

(. 4.6).
, - , ,
, -

.
, , . ,
, .
, , . ,
, , , , , ,
. ,

. 4.6.

194 4.

. ,
. ,
, , . , , ,
, ,
- . ,
, ,
,
.
, -

.
(
), : ,,
. , . ,
.
, , ,
, . , - . ,
. ,
.
, . . , , , , . .
1. , .
2. .
3. , .
4. .
5.
.
6. .
.
.
- .

4.3. 195

1. .
2. .
3. ().
, , ,
,
.
- ,
, .
,
.
. ,
,
, . ,
, . , , , ,
.
, , , , , ,
. , ,
, , , ,
.

4.3.7. :
,
. .

.
, ()
,
- (,
1940, . 538).
, ,
- ,
- . ,
. ,
- , . . , ,
-

,

196 4.

"" (, 1940,
. 539). (5),
, .
, , ,
, .
, , .
,
, , ,
, .
,
, .
, . , , , .

4.4.


( , . 4.7).
, , , . , ,

. 4.7. IQ
,

4.5. 197

-, . , (. . IQ , ).

. , . ,
.
, ( ) (Burt, 1963; .).
,
. , , .
.
, , , , . , IQ ,

, ;
,
(, 1980, . 63).
. (Anastasi, 1958) , - , . , , ,
- . ,

- ,
-
.

4.5.
( )
, ?
, , , ? , ?
, , ,
.
, .
, ,
, , , ?
.

198 4.

. .
,
- ,
- , . :
-

- . ,
; , ,
-
.
-


. ,
,
- , ,
. - ,

. - ,
, -
(Galton, 1865, . 157).
:
(Hereditary genius: an inquiry into its laws and
1869 . ,
, ...
, , ,
- .
(Burt, 1940, 1966)
. ,
, . ,
, ,
.

, 80 % (IQ)
(Jensen, 1969; Eysenck, 1979; .).
, 25 65 %
.
,
, .
1.
().
2. () () , , .
3.
, (
)..

4.5.
( 30000 ),
, . 4.3.

4.3

L. Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Jarvin,

.
.
- .
, , . 1963 ., (. 4.4).
. . - (1999), ( 1978-1980 .),
, (, !)
. ,

,. , ,
50 % , 0,4-0,8. : 40 80 %
(-

20 0

4.

4.4



,
- ( ,
1970-1990- .)
r

1,00
1,00
1.00
0,50
0,50
0,50
0,50
0,00

IQ

0,90
0,86
0,76
0,55
0,35
0,47
0,24
0,02

4,672
158
8,600
112
26,473
203
385

, 1999, . 237). (, 50 % , 50 %
) ,
.
, ,
, .

(, , IQ
- ).
. (Jencks, 1972), , ,
0,55. 0,28. . . (Schiff, Levontin,
1986),
. ,
IQ
.
, , , , , .
- () , ,
.
,
, . ,

4.5.

201

(Kamin, 1974), , . . 4.5,


: 0,26 0,35 -
.
4.5

, , , 1960- .,
(. 4. 6).
4.6

IQ ( ) ,
( 10 )

300 , ( ) .
,
, .
, ,
.
.
1. , .
2. .

20 2

4.

3. , .
..., , -, ,
- , ,
IQ , , -, -
; (120)
IQ, %
95 ; IQ 95, 15 % IQ
95 120 . ,
IQ,
, ,
(
:

, 100 % , 100 %
1
) (-, 1999, . 164-165).
,
.
,
, . -
, ,
.
, , .
0,76 0,94
0,44 0,66 .
, .
, . , , , , , , ,
0,3.
,
. , , ,
, . . . . -,
, , ,
. , , ,
,
.

4.5.

20 3

, , .
, ,
.
, ,
. , .
, (, 1980). 118 7 16 (61 , 57 )

(WISC). , , .
4.7.

4.7
WISC

(. . , 1980)


,
7-10

0,72
0,50
0,72
0,58
0,76
0,57
0,39
0,31
0,46
0,71
0,75
0,25

11-13

14-16

0,27
0,17
0,49
0,39
0,37
0,16
0,30
0,05
0,44
0,26
0,17
0,26

. ,
(- ); + , -
.

.
, .
, . . ,
- , ,
.
, , ,
.-

20 4

4.

, , (, !) , , .
, . . ,
WISC ( ), , , .
( , ):
(4) ?
(8) ?
(16) ?
(20) ?
(24) ?
, . . (
).
, , , ,
, .
14-15 . , , .
, -
. , ,
. , ,
. ,
, .
,
(, 2001, . 107-108).
. .
, ,
, , . , , , , , (, , ,
!).
, (. . ,. . ,

4.5.

20 5

. . , 1993), , (6,5 ,
94 ), (7,5 , 77 )
(9,5 , 51 ).
. , , .

6,5 7,5 9,5 . 3
-
:
- 6,5 7,5 , 9,5
,
6,5 . ,
6,5 7,5 ,
(9,5 ) . .

7,5
.
6,5 9,5 .

6,5 .
7,5 9,5
.

, . , , 7 84 % (, 1985),
. . , 0,3, . . . , , . ,
. , 3 . , ,
, , , .
,
, . ,
, .
, 12 48
. . 4.8,
, , -

20 6

4.

, ( MISTRA, 1990)
( SATSA, 1992).
0,640,17 0,780,07, . .
.
4.8
, ,
/

(/
/)

, , (1937) (/)
-(1980)
(-/)
(1962)(/)
, , -,
, (1990)
WAIS//
, , ,(1992)

19/19

0,680,12

0,74 0,10

0,71

12/12

0,64 0,17

0,73 0,13

0,69

38/37

0,74 0,07

0,76 0,07

0,75

48/42/43

0,69 0,07

0,78 0,07

45

0,78 0,06

0,78 0,07

0,75
0,78
0,75

, ( !) ,
(Burt, 1955, 1966). . ,
, - . , , , , .
, , , , , . , ,
, . , ,
. ,
(Eysenck, 1979) ,
. ,
, , .

4.5.

20 7

: , ? (Anastasi, 1958),
. 4.8 , ,
IQ , .
. , . , 0,77, 37 ,
. ,
-
( , ,
). 5 , ( , )
, 0,11.

X. , . . (Newman, Freeman, Holzinger, 1937). . ,
. ,
, . , . - (Juel-Nielsen, 1965).
, 5 30 10 . ,
,
.
, , ,
, ,
, .
. , (Farber, 1981)
, . ,
, , (. 22). IQ (The IQ game:A methodological
inquiry into the heredite enviroment controversy, Taylor, 1980)
- , ,
-

,
(
. ..) ,

,
,

- ,
IQ . - ,
(, - ), IQ,
, -

20 8

4.

( ), IQ
(. 92). , , 1
.
, , , , , , ,
, , , . , ,

- IQ, , ,
.
, , , , . :
1) , ;
2) , ;
3) .
, . ,
. ,
. , , ,
. , . . (Gordon, Lemons, 1997), ,
100% 100%
.
, , , , . . , ,
. , , , , , , , -?.

4.6.

20 9

, . , ,
, , , ,
. - ,
, , . :
, ? , , , , , , ( ), ?
, , , , . , ,
. , , . .
,
, . , , ...
! ( , 2001, . 106-107).
, . ,
, ,
, , . . . ,
, .
. .

4.6.

, , ,
, . ?

210 4.

, , (Broman, Nichols, Kennedy,


1975), , , 53 043
. 132 IQ 4- (,
- , , , -
- ).
,
-
(-
0,43,
- 0,35, 0,19 . .).
, - 17 125 0,11 0,37
4-- . :
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

0,37;
0,25;
0,22;
0,21;
0,17.

IQ
4 (1) , . , ,
.
(2) .
, ( ) ,
. -
(3,4).
, , IQ 4 (5). ( : 0,17,
0,15, 0,15.)
,
.
(0,07) (0,11). , ,
.

IQ 4- 132 .
, IQ
-
.
, ,

-
-

4.7. 211

. , , , . , , a
IQ
. , , , - , , 4- . , ,
, .
.
, , ,
, , , .
. . (1929), IQ .
, , (140 ) ,
.
,
,
,
, ,
, .

4.7.

, ,
7 , . ,

. ,
, IQ,
. , ,
, , IQ
.
,
, -.

. ,
.
.
,
, . ,

212 4.

, () . , -
(, ),
.
,
.
(Stafford, 1961; .).
. .
.
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
, .

4.8.

1980-1990- .
.
(Schoenthaler,1986),

-. , .
, , , . (. 4.7).
1997 . (Eysenck, Schoenthaler, 1997),
, . ,
.
. 4.9.
( IQ )
.

4.8.

1. .
2.
IQ.
3. (
) ( ).
4. , .
.
5. .
6. , ,
, , .
7. 20 % , ,
IQ 9 .
8.
, . .
9.
(3,5 IQ- ),
.
10. , , .

1976-77

1977-78

1978-79

1979-80

1980-81

1981-82
1982-83
-

, CAT


. 4 .8 .

214 4.
4.9
IQ , (
)

, 30 , 26
; b IQ , IQ, ; d
- ; .

, ,
.
, , . ,
IQ 3-4- , , .
,
, . , -

4.9. 215

. , ,
, , , .
. , ,
.

-
.
- , , -

4.9.
, , .
, . , ,
, , - . , -
, : , (
)

.
,
(, ,
-
) ,
.
.
, 2300
120 -

1 8-
;
2 ;
3
;
4
;
5

9.

216

4.

, (. . , 1974). , .
() , (. 4.9).
IQ , ,
- . ,
,
- - ,
- .
, ,
- . , . .
(1980), ,
(-
),
- (. 4.10).
4.10

. IQV ,IQp
- ,
IQp .
,
,
. . , .
(Bradley et al., 1989), , .
,
.

, ,
, ,
, -

4.9.

21 7

. ,
(, ,
), . . (Harrell, Harrell, 1945) 18782 ,
- .
, 74 (. . 4.11).
-
.
4.11

172
39
21
45
256
95
267
456
289
98
194
865
700
77

128,1
126,6
124,8
124,5
122,8
117,6
115,3
110,1
109,0
102,2
100,8
95,8
92,7
87,7

, ,
, . (Flynn, 1999) ,
, 1932 . (. 4.12).

4.12
IQ , ,

1

218 4.

. 4.10. (. Duncan et 1972)

, . . 4.10, . (1972).
, , . ( ), , , , .
, . .
, . ,
1
(path analysis), .
,
( ), . , IQ , ,
. IQ ,
.
, IQ,
(, 1967). (. 4.11), (0,26),
. , , , , , . ,
, , , ,
, .
() , , .

4.9. 219

. 4.11 . /, ,


(,
) , . , ,
, , . , .
IQ .
, .
1932 1978 . IQ
13,8 46 (.: , 1982 ., IQ 7 23 ,
, 1930- .). (Flynn, 1998)
IQ , , ,
(. 4.12).

.
1. .
2. .

, , ( ), , , (Flynn, 1999).
, IQ 1
, . IQ
, , ,
- , , ,
-

22 0

4.

. 4 . 1 2 . /

, , ,
, IQ, . ,
. , 1970- . , , , . ,
, , ,
.
, , IQ, , . , ,
.
, (American
Psychologist, 1999), .
(Flynn, 1987, 1998, 1999)
, ,
,
( , ).
, IQ , , . , ,
.

4.9. 221

,
. IQ 30 (. 4.13).
4.13

/ 30-

, IQ 150 ,
- .
- ,
- . , ,
, ,
.
,
, , .
- , IQ
, (.
- ).
, IQ,

-
.
() , . . ,
, ().
, , .
. ,
,
-, .
, . , . ,
, . ,
, ,
- , ,
- .
- ,
. ,
, , ,
.

22 2

4.

. (Duncan et 1972) ,
, ,
, , , , .
.
, ,
, . . (. : , 1982, .1, . 262)
, , , , , , , . .
, . , , , -, - , .
,
(, , , ),
, , : ,
,
, , , . , , ,
. ,
(. : . . , 1975, . 145-147).
, , .
. , , .
, -
.
.
, , . (
, , ) -

4.10. ,

22 3

, .
,

( 8- ).
. ,
-
,
(. . , . . , . . , 1986).
- , ,
- .
, ,
, , . IQ
,
.

4.10.
,

,
, . ,
, ,
, . , IQ. ,
. ?
,IQ, (Berkeley Growth Study, 1941). . (0,86 IQ 5, 6 7 IQ 17
18 ). , 80 % 17 18
5, 6 7 . 0,96 IQB 11, 12 13
IQ B 17 18 .
(-).,,,
IQ . . , 6 . 21,6,
14 5,8 ( 17-). IQ
. 50 % IQ 6, 7, 8 9 10

22 4

4.

IQ 17 . , IQ ( , ).
, ,
. IQ ,
, IQ, .
, .
, , - .
IQ ,
.
, . IQ 3- 16
, 3- 9 (,
1982, . 290). , IQ .
, . , IQ .
, . IQ 10 IQ 17 . ,
. . ,
IQ, .
, (. . 4.13) ( ,
). IQ . ,
, IQ .

(
-
).

-
- .
- , , , , ,
.

22 5

,
4.13. IQ

,
. ,
. , . , ,
20- 70-.
, .
, (SLS Seattle Longitudinal Study), 1956 .
( 1956 1991 . , ) , IQ
. IQ 80 90 . . (Schaie, Strother, 1968)
, ,
( 500 20 70 , 7
1
). () ,
(. 4.14). , , . (IQ) .
1980-1990- .
. 1980- .
.

4.10. , 2 27

, , , .
, .

, .
(Denney, 1982) : , (,
), , . ,
, .
, , . ,
. , , , . ( . ) , 70
90 . , 60-80 . , ,
, ,
, ( ). ,
.
, , ,
,
. ,
, , . ,
,
,
.
,
. , ?
, , , , (, 1982,
. 302). , , -, -

22 8

4.

, 60 , ,
. , ( , , , . .).
. (Rudinger, 1972) ,
( , 20-30%, 20%, 7-15%, 8 %). IQ . , 60
69 . . , , IQ 5-10- , ,
. , . . (1966),
.
IQ . , . , ,
.
, ,
.
(Williams et al., 1983) ,
,
. , .
, , , . ,
, . :
, , ?
, ,


,
"" <...>
, (, 1985, . 44).
.

4.10. ,

22 9

, ,
. . . (1968), , , 30-35 , ,
40 .
,
40-45 (. 152).
. 40- .

, . . . (1968), ,
, "" .

(Kramer, 1983; Pascual-Leone, 1983; Richards, Commons, 1984; Sinnott,
1984) , .
,
. , , . , . ,
. ,
. ,
, ,

.
: , (
), ,
. . . (Berg, Sternberg, 1985),
, (
) 30, 50 70 , ,
,
.
(Baltes et al., 1984) . , , ,
. .
: , ,
. -

23 0

4.

.
.

, , . ,
,
, . , . .
, , ,
.
.
. . ( ). , , ,
. ,
,
. ,
.


, ( ),
, , . ,
, . ,
, . . , ,
,
. , .
40
, , ( -

4.11. , ...

231

) ( ,
WAIS ,
). ,
60
, .
. .


- .
- ,
, .
. . ,
-
. . . (1984)
- ( . )
83
103 . 31 55 . ,
, .
, (performance) ,
() .

4.11 . ,


,
, .
1
. (English men of Science. Their nature and nurture,
1874). , . ,
. , , . , . , , , ,
-

.

,

, , .

23 2

4.

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

. 4.15. ,

, .
, (Sulloway, 1996). ( ),
,
, .

, ,
. , , .
. . (Zajonc, Markus, 1975) . . (Belmont, Marolla, 1973), 386 000 ( , ), ( . 4.15):
)
, , ;
(
-

4.11. , ... 2 3 3

, ).
. .
X. (Zajonc, Markus, 1975), ,
, ,
, . , , .
, . ,
120, , 80 (120 + 120+0 = 240; 240:3 = 80). ,
- , , 30.
, -

67,5 . . , ,
-
- .
.
:
, t i
, ; + , , , ; , .
, . , 3 ,
12 . ,
, ,
k , at . , :

23 4

4.

W1 W2
,
; , 0 , t
, 1 . W1 W2

. , .
k /() , . .
(2) , (
). ,
, . 0 ( 3), . , , . .
. ,
, , (
, , 14 , .
?
, .
? ,
, (?!) ? (!) ? , , ,
. ( ,
!), , , . , ,
, .
, , , ,
. . , , ,
. . .
, , ,

4.11. , ... 2 3 5

, . ,
, , .
, , . , 1976 . ,
1980 .
. . 1980 . . ,
, , .
,
. . (Plomin, 1986) ,
2 % .
(. , 2000; .). , , , <...> ,
. (proxy).
, ,
, ,
,
. , , .
, , , . ,
.
, , , , , ,
-
- . . . (1929), ,
- , IQ
, ,
. , IQ

( ), IQ .
, . . - , . 4.14.

, -

23 6

4.

, . -
. , (. . , 1988).
4.14

IQ (. . ,
1929)

, , , - . , ,
, . .
, .
. , , , , - 10 100 .
, ,
.
,
. , , ,
.
, . , ,
. . . (1988) , , , .
,
,
.
. -

4.12. :

23 7

(. , 1968). ,
, 3-4 .
. ( 7000 7 ) , (Warren et al., 1989). ,
, , ( 10- ).
, (Stewen, 1990). , ,
, . , 79
, 52 %
(Scott, 1989).
, , ,
, , , . , , . , ,

-
(, - , ; , ,
. .). , . . , ,
.
, , ,
, ,
.

4.12.
:


. ,
: , . , , ,
. ?
, IQ, , , ,
. -

23 8

4.

, , IQ-, . : ...
<...> . , . .
, , :
) , ;
) ,
.
. , , .

, ,
,
. , : , ,
, , , . . () , ,
,, ( . . .).
,

(, 1995, . 120).
, . : ...
; 5 . , ,
, 5 .
, . .
:
( , . 121).
,
( 0,5 0,7). ,
,

. , ,
,
. , .

4.12.:

23 9


, , . , ( ). , , , (, , , . .),
,
, , . , ( )
.
, .
, , , .
, .
,
- ,
. ,
,
- , ,
, ...
, -
.
- ,
, , -
. ,
- .
, ,
-
-
(, 2001, . 108-109).
, . , .
, , . ., ,
, , , .
, , , .
, .
, , -

24 0

4.

. ?
, , (- )

-
IQ. , ,
- , (
9 12 ),
- .
-. , , -
. IQ .

. . ,
. . IQ . , . . ,
, , .
1970-1980 . , IQ . ,
G ( ) (Weiss, 1986
.). , , .
? ,
, .
(
, )
, , -. , . , - ,

. , , ,
.

4.12. : 241

: ,

, , ?

. , , ,
, ,
, .
, .

(Hebb, 1949).
( ), , ( ). , .
(Vernon, 1955) , . , , , ,
, .

, (Jensen, 1969; Eysenck, 1979; .). , , .
. .
(1984): . ,
( ) .
, . (, ,
).
, , ,
.

, . - ,
- .

24 2

4.

, , (Ceci, 1990; Bruyn, 1993; Lee, 1997) .


1. ,
() .
2.
.
3.
.
4. , , .
.
-, , (Ceci, 1990,1993),
, (
). ,
, .
,
(G).
-, ,

. ,
. , ,
. , , , .

,
.
,
, ,
- .
- ,
, ,
- , , ,
1
, - .
2

A bio-ecological model of intellectual development Moving beyond h // Intelligence, Heredity and


Envi- ronment. Cambridge University Press, 1997.

4.12. :

24 3

, , , , ,
,
.
-, (),
() , ,
, .
, , .
- ,
(Bronfenbrener & Ceci, 1994).
() .
.
, . .
, ,
, , , . . , ,
, (Bronfenbrener & Ceci,
1984). ,
.
, , . ( ) ,
. , , .
,
. ,

, , ,
( ). , . , ,
; ,
. , , , , .

24 4

4.

(Bronfenbrener, Ceci, 1994) : , ,


.
, , , (, Herrnstein, 1973; Humphrey, 1989). ,
, ()
, .
, , . ,
, , ,
(,
,
2
). h (
), ,
, , , , , .
-, ,
,
. (, , ,
. .) (,
, ). ,
- ,
(
, ),
. , . ,
. , ,
, ,
.
, ,
, ,
.
(Bronfenbrener, Ceci, 1994) , , ( ), ,
.
, , ,

4.12. :

24 5

, , .
,
. (Bronfenbrener, Ceci, 1994). , , , , , (
).
-,
. ,
. , , - , () . (Ceci & Liker, 1984),
. ,
,
, , . . 4.16 , . , ,
(, ), . , 2
( h )
, , , , .
2
, h , , ,
2
. h , , ,
.
. , 25 (Bronfenbrener, 1975)
() , . - ,
. , IQ , , 0,8 ,
. 0,28 (, ). -

24 6

4.

. 4.16.
2

, h , , , .
, , ,
, , .
, (Bronfenbrener & Ceci, 1993,1994). , 2
, , h
,, , ,
.
, 3 , . , ,
-, ,

4.12.:

24 7

, . .
-,
.
2
, h
.
,
, ,
,
2
. , h
, , .
. , ,
, .
, , , , . ,
,, (, 1940, . 534).
, , , .
. . .
-
( , 1983, . 106), - ( , 1985, . 98).
.
, . . . (1940)
: ..., ,
. . ,
; . ,
(. 534).

() .
. . , ,

24 8

4.

. . ( ,
), -
; , (, 1959, . 144).
. . (1960, . 8)
:
,
, ; , , .
. , ... ,
(, 1960, . 7). ,
- - , ,
- .
.
- , ,
, ,
- (, 1985, . 9).
, ,
, , -
,
(, ) . , . ,
, .
, .
:
,
, ( )
- - (),
,
-- ,
, .

4.13.

. , , . ,

4.13. 2 4 9
, ,
. , , , (),
() ().

, . . , , .
, (1
), - (Eysenck, 1971), . . ,
(. , 1982). . . . (Wollach, Kogan, 1965), (. 4.15).

( )
(. . , 1968; .). ? ?
, .
, , , , ,
- . ., .
,
- ,
(, 1977, . 360).
, . . , : , ? (

WAIS) ,
.
,
. . , WAIS, ,
( ,
,
.

25 0

4.

4.15

( ,
)

, , , ).
(Eysenck, 1979), . , IQ .
,
. ,
( 5- ). .
, IQ ; ,
;

- , ,
, - ... ,
- ( , . 188).
IQ, . , , , . , () . ,
, -, , , ,
, , (
, . 190). , -

4.13. 251


. , , ,
.
, (: , ),
, . . .
(1940) : , , , ,
, , , . . (. 537).
, ( WAIS) (. , 1982). ,
,
. , IQ , .
, . ()

- ,
,

(
, )

(. . ., 1985).
- ,
- .
,
(, . . - , 1972).
, - .
- ,
.
, ,
.
, .
,

(. . , . . , 1974).
-

25 2

4.

. .


, ,

, , .
(). , ()
, (). .
, , , , . , ,
. ,
, , ,
. ( )
, .
, ,
. ,
, , . 1920- . ,
, ,
. , - . ,
-
()
1936 .
, , ,
()

25
3

, (
!) ,
. () ( ).
, ,
, , ,
, ,
.
, , ,
, , . . , -
. ,
, .


,
,
,

. , .
. .
1

.
,
.
.
,
, .
(Woodworth, 1917) ,
( ).
.
. inventory , . ,
, questionnaire , (
survey, , ).
(Alken, 1998) inventory
questionnaire , , , ,
. , , ,

5.1. ,

25 5


. 1950- .
. , "", ,
1
. 1960- . , ,
, , , . . (1971), .
, , , 1940- .
. , ,
, ,
, .
,
, ,
. , - (
), . , , , , ,
, ,
.
, ,
, .
, , ,
- , , . , , .
, . , .

5.1. ,


2
, . () . 20 ,
.. . : , 1956. . 169.
item,
- , , .

25 6

5.

(, MMPI 550 ).
, , :

(, . );
(, . );
(, . );
(, . );
(/ . );
(, . )

, , :
, (, . );
, 1
- (, MMPI).
, ,
- () .

.
- ,
- .
- ,
, , .
().
1. , . , , . : ? : , .
2. , : , , .
. , ,
,
(. ).
, ,
, . : . : , , .
, ..:..,..-..:
, 1999.

257

(288 . 18-22 )
, (50 ., . 30,4 )
(56 ., . 69,1 )
(71 ., . 32,4 )
. 5 . 1 .

3. , , . (). : . : , .
4. , (
). . , 1) ; 2) ; 3) -. : , .
5. , .
: , 7-
. , , ,
, .
, . : , , ,
, , , .
6. , , . , , . .

(). , ,
. : , , .
7. ,
. , .
, . ,

25 8

5.

. 5.2.

, .... : ) (),
; ) ;
) .
, , , . , , (. 5.1)
(. 5.2).

5.2.
. ,

, , , ,
. , ,
, , , ,
, . , ? ()?
, , .

5.2.1 .

:
, . , ,
, . , -

5.2. ... 2 5 9

,
, .
, , - , . . , , , , .
. (Nunnally, 1978) ,
. , , ,
, . , . ,
,
- , - .

.
, , , ( . . 2), . ,
( , ),
. , . , 11%
I-. ,
, ,
, (Hathaway, 1965).
,
.
, , , , . , , ,
, .
, .
, , , ,
(response set). ,
, ,

, (response set ofsocial desirability). , , . , (Edwards, 1957).


, ,

26 0

5.

(. , 1982).
, ,
() ,
. ; - (
),
, . . (Nunnally,
1978), , , :
) ( )
, ,
,

;
) , , , ,
, ( ,
, ), .
, ,

. ,
G- . , ,
. , . , , , , (. .
. . , 1985).
, ,
.
( ) .
, , () .
, (
, , , ).

5.2. ... 261

, , ,
.
.
, ,
.
,
, . , .
, .
,
(Mischel, 1977), .
,
,
.
,
. . ( ) (response set of acquiescence)
- ,
. ,

, .


- , ,
, , ( )
. ,
. , . ,
- ,
(, )
- ,
, ,
- .
, ,
(response set of using the uncertain or middle category).
,
.

- ,
. - , ,

( ).

,
. . (1994) - ,
, ,
.

26 2

5.

(response
set of using the extreme response).
,
. -

, , ,
.
, (deviation). , . (Berg, 1967), , . , .
, . , . , .

- . ,
- , , , ,
, -
. - ,
, ,
- , ,
- , , .
, . - ,
, , ,
, , - . . .
(1985), -, - ,

-
, . ,
, - ,
.

, . , ,
, , ,
, .
, , .
.

5.2.2.

,
. , 11 35
% -

5.2.

...

26 3

.
, , ( ) 1
. ?
, ,
. (Goldberg, 1963). , , .
. , . , . 2
,
.
, , :
1) , . .
, ;
2) , . . , , ;
3) , , . . , ,
;
4) , , .
, 4- , .
, , (2- ) (3-
). ,
, 1.
,
, 2- 3-, 2- , 3- .
, , ,
. .
. , ,
, .
, -, , ,
, -, .

26 4

5.

. , . , . ,
. , , .
( )
. , ,
,
.
,

:
( ). , . , .
() , :
. ( )
.
, .

5.2. ...

26 5

, , . . 5.3.
, , , : , ; . :
;
;
(
- ,
,
).

5.2.3.
, (), . j
, .
.
, -
() .
/- ().
1940- . , , , ,
. . . , ,
(Eisenberg, 1941).
, (), , , , , . (Goldberg, 1963; Nowakowska, 1975),
.

(Nowakowska, 1975), . (Goldberg, 1963) .
s
(, ). , . -

26 6

5.

, s-. s
, / . j-. , ,
,

,
()
-,
.
:
.

,
. , ,
.
: , , , . ,
.
.
.
, , , (
. , ,
, ).
s,
. , ? ( ).
,
. , . . , .
( s ). : , ?
( ).
, ,
. , , ( s),
, : ?.
, , , ,
.

5.2. ...

26 7

. . , ( ), . , : , ? ( ) , j s .
.
, ,
.

5.2.4. ,

, , , , . .
, , . (Nowakowska, 1975).

, . , .

(. 5.1).
( ) , : I - ( 12, 14 7); II () ( 10,11,9); III
( 2, 3, 4, 5, 8,15,17); IV () ( 1, 6,
16); V ( 13); VI
- ( 16); VII
,
- ( 9,11).
. .
, (. 5.4). (R1 R2, R3). Rt ;
R2 , () ;
R3 (, , ).
;
III , ( II). II, . , ,
: . (
) ,
V ( ).

26 8

4.


1.
.
2.
.
3.
.
4.

.
5.
,
.
6.
, .
7. , ,

,
.
8. ,

().
9. ( )
.
10. ,
.
11. ,

.
12. .
13.
.
14.
.
15.
.
16.
,
.

.


.
.


.

.

,
.

, .
() ,
,
,
.
,

().
( )
.
,

.
,

.

.

.

.

.


.

.

27 0

5.


, , IV I ( -
). . ,
), . , ,
, .
. ,
. , .
( ) .
,
III. , III, : .
,
, (Nowakowska, 1975, . 155). ,
, ( , ), , . , .
R,
. , ,
, . ,
, .
(), ( ). ( , ).

, . ,
:
1)
, , ;
2) ,
, .

5.2. ...

27 1

, ,
. ,
, .
.
(16PF
) , .
, , ( * ,
):
, ;
, *;
, ,
*;
,
*;
,
*;
, *;
, , *;
, ,
*.
, . , . , .
. , .
, , , ,
( , . 168).
, ,
, . , ( ,
), . ( , ).
, , . (Fiske, 1971). ,

27 2

5.


: ( ), .
,
(, ). , ,
.
, . , , , . , , ,
.
, , , .
,
, .
()
.
, (Fiske, 1971, . 208). ,
, ( ) . , , ,
.
, , , ,
, , , ( - ). ,
, . , . (1982).
, , ,
, ,
,
.
, . , , ,
.

5.2. ...

27 3

,
, (
). , ,
. . ,
, . ,
. , - . . , . .
, .
. , , . . (Sanocki, 1978), ,
,
, .
, . (Nowak, 1970), ,
- , ,
- (, ). .
I: , ,
, .
II: , , , ( ,
, , , , ).
III: ,
. ,
, .
, - .
, ,
. . (Wiggins, 1973), ,
MMPI,
, . ,
, , : , , .
, : , . . , -

27 4

5.


() .
, ,
, ,
. ,
,
, . - .
, ,
, , , , MMPI,
( MMPI
, . [Hathaway, 1965] 10-20 %) .
, , :
?
,
, ( ) .
, .
,
<...> , ,
, . . (Sanocki, 1978, . 255).
, , , ,
- .


,
, , , , ( , .
256).
:
1) ,
, , 1
;
2) () , , ;
3) , , , . .
, ;
4) (
) , , , .

5.2. ...

27 5

, , ( )
, , .

.
(. . , 1967; . . , 1989; .), (Strelay, 1982; .)
, . , - , ,

. , , , , (The Guilford
Zimmerman Temperament Survey, 1956). He ,
. .
,
, , .
, . (Strelay, 1982) : ,
,
. ., . , ( . . .)
, , (. 128). ,
.
, , , , ,
- MAS (
),
- .

, . . (1987), ,
- - ,
-
.
- , ,
, -
,

. -

,
,
,
,
- ,
.

27 6

5.

5.3.

, .
(), , - ,
.
. , MMPI , . , ,
. - . - (Hathaway, 1965; Wade & Baker, 1977; .).

, . , , .
, ,
-
,
,
, . ., (, 1979, . 55), .
, .

. ,
, (). ,
(. . , . . , 1985).
.
(
, ).
,
.
(), . .
. ,

5.3.

27 7

5.2

.
, -:
22 ,
?
26 , , ?
30 , ?
33 ,
?
43 , ?
46 , , ?
50 , ?
65 , ?
67 ,
/ ?
74 , ?
76 , ?
79 ?
83 , ?
87 , ?
,
2
6
9
11
18
37
53
57
61
71
90

, ?
, - -?
?
, ?
?
, ?
, ?
?
, ( , )?
?
, , ?

,
- , ,
.
, , ,
- , . ,
.
, MMPI
, .
- , .
- ,
, , ,
-

27 8

5.

, ,
- . ,
- . ,
- ( !) .
,
, - ,

, . ,
, -

,
-
.
. (Eysenck, 1952)
. .
1
, (), (Eysenck, 1968; . Eysenck, S. Eysenck, 1975). . 5.2 , .
. . (1975) , :
1) ;
2) (dimensions).
.
,
( )
- .
( N). ,
,
, .

,
- , ,
(E u N, . .),
- (Eysenck, 1960, . 10).

. , , ,
.
, .
. (Bishop, 1977) , . , , .

- .
tough-mindedness (, ). .

5.3.

27 9

, ,
, , (Bishop,
1977, . 127).

,
. , ,
"" , (Claridge, 1973, . : Bi1
shop, 1977) .

, -
500 , .
, ( , ,
,
, , .).
, , . . , , , , , ,
, .
,
( ,
, , -
.). , : . , ,
. , , , . - , . ,
, .
, ,
, ,
.
, .


.
, (. . , 1979, . 51).

28 0

5.

, ,
; ,
. , -
(. Eysenck, S. Eysenck, 1975, p. 5).
, , , . :
, ,
, , ; , (. 130).
,
, , , , . , ,
, . , -.
, -
. ,
, .
, , ,
- -
, ,
, , . , .
. , , .
(. Eysenck, 1977) , ,
, ,
, , . , , -, , .
,
(Psychoticism as a Dimension of Personality, H. Eysenck,
S. Eysenck, 1976), . , , ,
, (. 19). ,
, , , , .

5.3. 281

,
, , -
(. 22) : ,
, (genes of
small value), .


- , ,
- (. 29).
,
(
- -).
,
. ( ). () -
, , ,
- (!), ( ),
.
,
, .

. . ,
,

. , , . .
(. . , 1973).
-
(Block, 1977). , , . ,
, , , -. (: 3,78 3,09
5,66 4,02) , ,
- , ,
50 ! (Block, 1977, . 433).
.
, - , ,
. , -

28 2

5.

. , , "", ,
- (Block, 1977, . 433).
. , ,
, , , . ,
, . , . ,
, ,
- , (
).
-, , ,

.
, ,
. - (. Eysenck, S. Eysenck, 1977, p. 651-652).
.
, , ,
"" ""
(. , . , 1976, . 119).
, . , , ,
.
, ,
- , .
.
, ,
- . , (Guilford, 1975,1977),

- ,
- ,
: S () R (, ).
(Eysenck,
1977) .
, . , , , - .
16F -

28 3

, . . (1982)
, , ,

, . (. Eysensk,
1977). , -, ,
, Q-, .
, , , (. 3.2).

. - . , , ,
,
. -, , .
, . , . (),
, , , . , ,
, , , , , .
.
, , . , . ( ) , , , .

, .
,
, , , ,
-
, , .

...
...

. .
- . .
,
, 1
,
, .
( ) ,

.
, , .
, .

(
, XVII
2002 . .

6.1.

28 5

) 1960- . , -
. , . , ,
. - ,
, , , , .

, , , , , , .

6. 1
.

, , ,

, , , ,

. , ,
, , ,
,

,
-
. , ,
- .
,
.
. , .
, , . . . , , ,
. ,
, dementia praecox , , . , , ,
, ,
.
100 (, , , , ) , .

28 6

6.

- .

,
.
1905 . , , , 2 , . ,
, ,
, , 3. . , dementia praecox , ,
,
, . ,
, .
, . ,
,
.
, .
. . (Kent & Rosanoff, 1910) ,
100 . , , , . ,
, , ( ).
(Rosanoff & Rosanoff, 1913) . 300 , , 11 .
XIX XX ., , . . , . , , ,
, , , .
,
. ,
,
, , .
,
, . . . , . . ,

6.2. :

28 7

, 1938 .
, (). , 1922 . ,, .

6.2. :


, .
,
,
, , . , .
.

6.2.1.

( . projectio )
- 3. (Freud,
1894). ,
,

- .
. ( , , .) .
, 3. , . , ,
( . . .),

.
, 3. ,
,
. . .

.
, . . (Halpern, 1977) , -

28 8

6.

. ,
. .

. , ,
, . , . ,
, .
,
, ,
.
, , , 3. . ,
- ,
,
,

- . . (1969), ,

,
, .
, ,
, . , , , , .
, , ,
, , .
. , , ,
,
, , -
. , ,
, -
. (2000) : , ....
, , , (. 12).
, , , , , , .

6.2. :

28 9

. . ,
. , .
. ,
,
.
. ...
, , , ... ,
, .
, .
( , , ,
).
, ,
. ,

.
. , , ,
. ,
, .
, , ,

(- ) ,
- .

,
. .
- (r= 0,62)

-
,
.
, -
, , , .
. (Holmes, 1968), ,
.
( ), . , (. 6.1).
, ,
, , . ,
(, , , ).

29 0

6.

6.1



1
.
,
, . , , ,
. , ,
. , .
,
, ,
. , , ( )
,
. , ,
.

6.2.2. ,

,
, (Murray, 1935).
, ,
. ,
. . , , , , .
, , ,
.
. 1939 . (
, , . ,
, .

6.2. : 291

, 1948 . Frank, 1948).


, .
1. .
, , ()
, .
2.
, ,
.
3. , , , , ,
{configuration) . ,
, , , , . .
, . ,
,
,
, . ,
, . , ,
.
.
.
, . , , ,
.
:
1) , ;
2) ;
3) .
. . , ,
.
.
. -
, . , 10 , , -

29 2

6.

, ,
(. 6.1). :
, ? , , ,
, .
, , 1
.

. 6.1. - (-)

2.

. (
, .), .
(. 6.2), , , , . -

. 6.2.
.: . . . :
, 1979.

6.2. : 2 9 3

, ,
( ),
,
.
3. . , - , . . -,
, (. 6.3). , ,
, ,
, , .
, , ,
, .

/ 6.3. 4

4. . . , ( ) ,
, ,
.
5. . ,
,
, , .

29 4

6.
1

6. . , , (. 6.4). , . ,
.

. 6.4. , ,

7.

.
.
,
. , ,
- 8 ( ).
- .
- , ,
.

- .
-
.
3
8. .
, . , : ...,
, ... . .
,
.
, , . , . (misperceptive tests), . .
, .
, . .
(., .: c . . . .: - +, 1999).

6.2. :

29 5

6.2.3.
, , , () .
. , ,
.
, . , , ,
. ,
, . .
. , , ,
. , ,
,
.

. , - .
I , , , , , ,
, .
II , , , .
III , , , , , .
IV , , , , , ,
, .
V , .
VI .
VII , , , , , ,
, , .
VIII , .
IX , , .
X , , , , , ,
.
,
. ,
. , , (, ) (, ),

29 6

6.

, , .
,
. , , . , .
(Kenny, 1964).

- .
.
- (, , ).

(, - ,
. .)
.

- , ,
, -
(, , - ,
). ,

( ).


.
, (
, ). , , .
,
( )
(, , ,
, .) .
, . ,
,
. ,
, .
, . , (
) , ( ).
, . ,

6.2. :

29 7


-, . ,
. , , . , . , , ,
.
,
(protrusive) . , . . (1969), ,

,
.
,
( ). , , . (arousal) ,
.
,
, , , .
,

,
- .


- , ,
- . ,
, ,

- .

.
-
,
, , ,
.
.
, ,

.
. , ,
(F+). , , . ,

29 8

6.

, .
, , .

,
-
( ),
,
(high-anxiety-evoking
situa- tions)


,
.
,
, .
, , , , (
) , , . .
(drive) ,
. :
) , ,
,
; ) ; ) , ,
, ; ) , ,
, , ,
-
; ) ,
, . . , ,
1
, .
, , , , , ,
, . , , ,
,
. . ,
. , .

6.3.

29 9

, ,
, .
, ,
-
.

. ,

-
- (

).
,
- , .
-
,
-
.

.
. ,
, , . , , , ,
, . .

6.3.


-.

3.
(, , ) (, .)
1
, . , .
, .
, , . . , ( ,
), ,
(. ). , . ,
( . cathexis )
- , ; ,
. , ,
- , ,
- .

30 0

6.

,
,
. ,
, .
- , , .
,
.
, . , . ,

,
. -
.
1. . . ,
,
, , , .
2. . , () .
3. . , . , , ,
.
4. .
. ,
, . ,
, .
5. .

- .
,
, . , .
,
, . , (New Look).
. . -

6.3. 301

: , . . ,
, , . ,
.
. , : .
,
.
, ,
. . , , , , , , . , , ,
,
.
. , , .
-, , , .
:
1) (
);
2) ;
3) (
, ).
. ,
, .

. : ; ; ; . ,

, . .
, , . ,
, (, , -)
(, )
. ,

30 2

6.

. ,
- ( ) ,
- ,
-
. . (Bruner, 1948)
.
, , , , .
,
, , .
, , ,
.

, - .
, ,
- , ,
- , .
,
,

-
, ,

, ,
, - .
- .
,


.
. , . , , , , (
. ). , . , . ,
,
, , , .
1950- . ,
,
-,
. , . (Rapaport, 1945) ,
- , -,

- , -,

6.3.

30 3

, .
, -, . ,
.
, .
, .
.
,
,

- .
,
.
. , . (Weiner, 1993) , , , , , ,
; .
, , . , , . . : -, , ,
, ; -,
, , , ,
, (.
. [Exner, 1980, . 564]: , , . , .
- , , ,
, -).
. :
( , , ,
) ( , ), -.
.
, , ,
- ; ,
; . ,

30 4

6.

, , (Rapaport, 1946/1968; Exner, Weiner, 1982).


,
, .
, ,
, ,
.
. . (1961)
,
. . . , ,
. , . . (1975), , , , ,
, .
.
, , . . (1975), . . . (1980),
, , , , ,
. : .
, . . , , . , .
. . . , , , , (
). . . . , , , , . , ,
.
, ,
,

6.3.

30 5

, ,
, .
,
,
. , - . ,
.
. . (1995) ,
, ,
(. 42). ,
, ,
... "" ,

--. ... "", ------;
" " - "--" (. 43).

, , ,
.
. . (1998), , , ,
, , , . , , ,
(. . 2),

.
,
, ,
- ,
, (. 32).
- .
- , , ,
,
- - ,
- ,
.
-

-

30 6

6.

( ). -
, . , ,

-. ,
.

-
.
,
, , , .
, . ,
,
, , ,
(. 41). , , ,
, ,

, ,
(. 42).
, , , . ,
,
, , , . , .
, . . (1957), , . ,
,
() ,
, . , , ,
.

6.3.

30 7

, , ,
, , .
(
) ,
. -
.
,
, , .

.
( ) , . .
,
.
, . . ,
,
, , ,
-
.
, , . ,
. , , , . , , ,
-,
, ( - ),

(

)

- . ,
- .
, ,
.
,
1950- .
, , -, , -,
- .
,
-

30 8

6.

, - ( ,
), . , , ,
.

, -. , (. . 2): , , ,
.
,
, , ()
- ,
- , ,
- .

, , ,
, .
,
, , , , , , , , ,
.
- ,
, .

6.4.
, , ,
, : .
,
? , , , , : , "", ,

6.4.

30 9

, , .

, ,
.
, , .
-
,

-

,
. ,

.
.
, , . , ,
1940- 1950- ., . , . (,
1986), .
(Lindzey, 1961, . 45) , ,
. .
, 1
. , , . ?
, ,
(, . .),
, , ,
. , V (
)
.
, .
, . ,
, .

310

6.

, , . , 1
( )
, . , , , , ,
, . , , . .
, ,
, , ,
.
.
,

- ,

( ).

- , , , ,
,
.

?
, , . , ,
. ( , : , ).
,
( )
. , , , , . , :
.
.

, , .
.
,
,
, .
, ,
, , , . .

6.4. 311

, , , , .
, .
? , , .
, ,
. ,
, .

. ?
. (Holmes, 1978,
1981) ,
, ,
- . ,
, . , , , . ,
- , , .
, .
, ,
,
(,

- ).
- , ,
( , !), . .
-
.
,

,
, - .
- . (.
6.1) .
, . , . , ,
. , (), , , .
.

312

6.

,
.
, , , . ,
.
. , .
. . PsychologicalBulletin 1980- . . .
- ,
,
.
, -

- .
,
.
. (
). , , :
) ; ) .
. , , . , .
.
:
.

, 1
(. 6.5) .

. 6.5.
. ,,,
, , .
,2.1, .

6.4. 313

. ,
: ) ( : ); ) - ( :
). ,
, . ,
, , .
, . , .
,
.
, , .
, ,
, . , , , ,
, .
, . . ( 1 9 7 1 ) ,

- ,
- , ,
-
- .

.
- ,

, .
, ,
- ,

.
(. 6, ). , , , , .
( ) .
. , , , , VII . ( ). ,

314 6.

, , .

, organa genitalia feminina.
() , . . ,
, . . . (1981), , , , .
, . , .
.
, ,
. , , , .

, .

. (Rapaport et al, 1946/1968). , ,

. ,
, . ( , , ,
), , , ,
, , .
, , .
;
, , , , (Rapaport et al.,
1946/1968,
p.
415).

6.5. ? 315


.
, .

6.5.

?
1940- . . - . , . , , ,
.
,
,
, .
. (, 1986), , , .

,
; , . ,
, , , .
. , ,
, , .
.
. , . . (1985), , , ,
, .
, , , .
,
. (
, ,

316 6.

.). ,
.
, , . , . ,
, . ,
, .
, , () . , V ,
1 , , . 0 . , , , . , , ,

,
.
, , , ,
, . Journal of Personality Assessment 1995 .
. ,
, , .
. . .
, ,
, -:

- (
)
-
( ).
-


-,
-

- (-

).
, -


. -
. - -

1
, - Comprehensive System . ,
, ,
, .
, {Comprehensive System),
- .
. , ,
- ,
,
-

6.5. ? 317

. , Comprehensive System
. (Philips, 1992), , , ,
. . . , , , . -
,
.
, . . , . , . -
, . ,
,

. . , ,
, .
,
-
-
. . ,
. ,
,
. ,
(, 2000), : , .
, , .
: 1) ,
- ,

;
2)
- .
. . (1982)
- ( ),
, . : ) ,
- , )
,
(,
1993). . (Erdberg, 1993) () ,
.

318

6.

, , ( ).

, . , .
,
.
,
, ,

(, 1982, . 296).
, , , , . . , , . ,
, , .
, , ( !), , ,
.

6.6.
. (1994) , , , .
, , .

1
, -.
, . .
. (. 6.6-6.8).
1. , . . .
. , (. . 6.6).
, (1- )
() ,

- . (
) -
.

6.6.

.6.7

. 6.6

.6.8
2. , , .
, : , , ,
- .


, (. . 6.7).
3.
.
, ,

,
,
(. . 6.8).
? , , ,
, . . ,
, . , .
,
- .
, ,
- .
,
. ,
,
-

32 0

6.

, . -
. ,
( . .) ,
.

, , , , -
.

, , . 1920-1930- . , .
, , .
, , ,
, , , , . ,
.

.
-, , ( . ).
, ,
.
,
, . , , , ,
.
,
- -, -

32 1

, . ,
, , , , , -, ,
.
, ,
,
, .
.
,
, .
.
,
, . , .

, .
- , ,
- ,
,
.

. ,
. ,
.

( ), .
, , ,
,
. , , , . , ,
, ,
- .

. // / . .
: -, 2000. - . 30-54.
. . : // . 1995. 1.
. 111-131.
. . / . . .: ; .: +,
1999. . . /16,5 3?
- // . 1993. . 1.
2. . 9-23. . . :
- //

. - 1981. - 2. - . 29-35.
. . //
. 1968. 6.
. . // ( ). .: - ,
1976.
. . / . . .: -; - -, 2001.
. / . . .: , 1982.
. 1.; . 2.
., . / . . .: , 2001.
. . :
- . .: - , 1986.
. .
18 35 // (
): . . - .: , 1971. - . 29-35.
. // / .
. - .: -, 2000. - . 10-29.
., . ( ) / . .; . . . . : , 1995.
. . I //
( ). - 1928. - . 2. - . 192.
. .
// . 1987. . 8.

3 . -. 137-144.
. . IQ , , // :
. 1929. . 2. . 86-90.
. . //


. .:
- . - 1974. - . 53-61.

, 3 2 3

. . // . 1981. 1. .
. / . . .: , 1977. . 13-130.
. . ( ). : , 1979.
. . . : -,
1997.
. .
// . 1987. . 74.
. . // . - 1993. - 5. - .
. . . : ', 1989.
., . . : ? //
- . 1998. 2. . 136-143.
. ., . . .
16 PF // . - 2000. - . 21. - 5. - . 82-86.
. ., . . // . 1994. 5. .
. .,.. // . 1991. 4. . 169-173.
. ., . . // . 2000. 1. . 126-134.
. ., . . - . .:
, 2001.
. . '
16PF. //

. 3. - 1997. - . 49-57.
. ., //
. 1976. 4. .
. . . .: 6 . - .: , 1982. - . 1. - . 388; 1983. 5 . - . 257-321.
. . // . 1988. 26.
. 19-20.
. . // . 1974.
3. - . 145-150.
. . (). .: , 1962.
. . // . 1985. 5.
. 36-45.
. . : . : - -, 1990.
. . . .: , 1999.
. .: , 1994.
. . ., . . - .
- . 106-108.

32 4

. . . .: , 1987.
.., ..,.. - // . 1987. . 8, 6. . 79-89.
. ., . . // . 1977. 3. . 107-125.
. .
- ( ) // . -.
. . . - 1984. - 5, . 1. - . 120-122.
. .
//
. 1989. 1(1). . 22-27.
. . . .: , 1978.
. . .
I. // . 1980. . XVI, 1.
. 165-175.
. . .
. // . 1980. . XVI, 2.
. 351-359.
. // . - 1982. - . 3, 2. - . 120-126.
. / . .; . . . . :
, 1994.
.
// .
1968. - . 14. - 2. . 142-158.
/ . . . . . . .: , 1985. 432 .
. . . . .:
, 1986.
. .
/ . . .: , 1980. . 306-315.
. // . 1985. 1. . 9-18.
. . . . . .: , 1977.
. 159-230.
. ., . ., . // . . 1968. 7. . 70.
. . . .: , 1998.
. . : , . .: , 1999.
. , / . .
.: , 1982.
. . . .: , 1984.

32 5

. ., . .
. , 1985.
. . : , 1975.
. . . .: - +, 1999.
. // . .: , 1981. . 45-67.
/ . . . , . . . .: , 1987.
: . -
: , 1996.
. . // . 1981. 1. . 57-66.
. . . .: 1967.
. 155-160.
. // / .
. .: , 1969. . 55-231.
: . . .: -, - -,
2000.
: / . . . ,
. . . 2- ., . .: - , 2000.
/ . . . , . . , . .
. .: , 1983.
: / . . .:
, 1999.
., . / . . .: ,
1972.
- . . // . .: , 1978. . 22-47.
-..,.., .:.
1999.
. / . . .: , 1979.
. ,
75-84- // . 1985. . 6, 5.
. 144-145.
. . . - .: - , 1957 - . 287-306,
307-316.
. . . .: , 1940. 596 .
. . . .: - ,
1959. - . 171.
. . //
. 1960. 3. . 8.
. . // .
-: . 14. . - 1979. . 48-55.
. ? // 9- . :
/.,
2 . - . 318-319.

32 6

. . EPI // . - 1987. - . 8, 1. - .
. . //
. 1989. . 10, 1. . 10-21.
. . //
/ . . , . . . - ., 1995.
. ., , .
// . 1990. . 1. . 34-48.
. . . .: , 1980.
. . . .: , 2001.
. ., . . // . 1975 1. . 30-37.
. / . . .:
- , 1982.
. . . . // . - 1989. - . 10. - 2. - . 33-45.
. . . : , 1961.
, / . . . . ,
. . , . . . .: , 1989.
. // . - .: , 1966. - .
. . //
. - .: 1977. - . 129-135.
X. / . . .: , 1986. .
1. . . , 1983.
. . .: , 1969.
. . // . . . . 1968.
68. - . 8. - . 1238-1252.
. // . . . . 1973. . 73. . 9.
. 1403-1413.
. // ( ).
.: , 1930. - . 182-190.
. . //
. - 1981. - 5. - .
. . //
. 1992. . 13, 1. . 6-14.
. . . .: , 1976. . 261-273.
. XX . .: - -. 1974.
. 168-173.

32 7

N. ., ., Chesney, M. A., Cohen, S., Kahn, R. & S. L.


(1994). status and health: The challenge of the gradient. American
Psychologist,
Ager,A.(Ed.) Microcomputersandclinicalpsychology:Issues,applicationsand
future developments. New York: Wiley.
Aiken, L. R. (1987). Assessment 'intellectual functioning. Boston, MA: &
Bacon. Aiken, L. R. (1996). Personality assessment methods and practices.
Seattle: and
Publishers.
Aiken,L.R.(1997).Questionnairesand Surveyingopinionandassessingpersonality. New York John: Wiley and Sons Inc.
Albright, L. E., Glennon, J. R., & Smith, W. J. (1963). The use of psychological tests
in industry. Cleveland: Howard Alien Inc. Publishers.
P. (1992). Psychologists rethink Burt. Nature, 356, 5.
Alien, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA:
Brooks-Cole.
Allison, J., S. J., & C. N. (1968). The interpretation ofpsychological
New York: Harper & Row.
Allison,J.,Blatt,S.,Zimet,(1968).Theinterpretationofpsychologicaltests.NewYork:
Harper and Row.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rine& Winston.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, &
Winston.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical Psychological Monographs, 47.
Allport, G. W., Vernon, P. E., & Lindzey, G. (1960). Study of Values, (3rd ed.). Boston:
Houghton-Mifflin.
G. (1989). Quantum mechanics as subjectivity and projective
ofContemporaryPsychotherapy,19,
American Education Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standards for educational and
psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological AmeriJournal of Psychiatry, 146, 200-205.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and
National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational
andpsychological testing. Washington, D. C: American Psychological Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychological Association (1986). Guidelines for computer-based tests and
interpretations. Washington, DC : Author.
American Psychological Association (1987). General guidelines for providers of psychologicalservices.AmericanPsychologist,
American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code
ofconduct.AmericanPsychologist,

32 8

American Psychological Association Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment


(1996). Statement on the disclosure of test data. American Psychologist,
American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Delivery of Services to Ethnic
Minority Populations (1993). Guidelines for providers of psychological services to
ethnic,linguistic,andculturallydiversepopulations. Psychologist,
American Psychological Association. Casebook on ethical standards of
psycholo- gists. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
American Psychological Association. Ethical principals of psychologists. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
American Psychological Association. (1985). Standardsfor educational andpsychological tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
American Psychological Association. (1986). Guidelinesfor computer-based test interpretations. Was h i n g t o n , DC: American Psychological Association.
American Psychological Association. (1987). General guidelines for providers of
psycho- logicalservices.AmericanPsychologist,
American Psychological Association. (1988). Computer use in psychology. Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association.
American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and
code of conduct. American Psychologist,
Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5th ed.). New York:
Macmillan. Anastasi, A. (1996). Psychological testing (7th ed.). New
York: Macmillan.
Anderson,G.J.,&Walberg,H.J.(1976).Theassessmentoflearningenvironments.Chicago, University of Illinois.
Anderson, A. M. (1982). The great Japanese increase. Nature,
Andrews, L. W, & Gutkin, . . (1991). The effects of human versus computer
author- ship on consumers' perceptions of psychological reports. Computers in
Human Beha- vior,
Angleitner A.& J. S. Wiggins (Eds.) (1986). Personality assessment via questionnaires
(p. 143-165). Berlin:
Anglietner, A. &., Wiggins, J. S (Eds.) (1986). Personality assessment via
questionnaire: Currentissuesintheoryandmeasurement. Berlin:
E., & Reznikoff, M. (1976). Rorschach content interpretation. New York: Grune
&Stratton.
Aronow, E., Reznikoff, M., & Moreland, K. L. (1995). The Rorschach: Projective
tech- nique or psychometric Journal Personality Assessment,
Aronow, E., Reznikoff, M., & Moreland, K. L. (1995). The Rorschach: Projective
tech- nique or psychometric Journal Personality Assessment,
Arthur, D. (1994). Workplace testing. New York: American Management Association.
Association for Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance. (1984). Guide to
microcomputer intestingandassessment.Washington,DC:AmericanAssociationfor
Counseling and Development.
Bagnato, S. J. (1991). Assessment for early intervention: Best practices for professionals.
NY: Guilford Press.
Baillargeon, J., & Danis, C. (1984). Barnum meets the computer: A critical
ofPersonalityAssessment,

32 9

. ., . G. (Eds.) (1984). Life-span development and behavior. V. 6. New


Academic Press.
Baron, J. (1985). Rationality and intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barton, P. E., & R.J. (1994). America's Schools. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Bellack, A. S. & Hersen, M. (Eds.) (1988). Behavioralassessment:Apracticalhandbook
(3rd ed.). New York: Pergamon.
Bellak, (1993). The TAT, CAT, clinicaluse (5th ed.). New York: Grune &
Stratton.
Bennett, R. E., & Ward, W. (1993). Construction versus choice in cognitive
measurement:Issuesinconstructedresponse,performancetesting,andportfolioassessment.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Benton, D. (1992). Vitamin and mineral intake and human behaviour. In A. P. Smith
& D.Jones (Eds.), Handbook of human (Vol. 2) (p. 25-47). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Berk, R. A. (1982). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore, MD: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Berk,R.A.(Ed.) Aguideto testconstruction.Baltimore,MD:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
Beutler,L.E.,&Berren,M.R.(Eds.).(1995).Integrativeassessmentof New
York:
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1908). The development of infant intelligence. The Annals of
Psychology,
Bishop, D. V. M. (1977). The P Scale and Psychosis./ 86,
134.
Blake, J. (1989). Number of siblings and educational attainment. Science, 245, 32-6.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1976). Genetic factors in intelligence. In A. R. Kaplan (Ed.),
Human behavior genetics. Springfield, Charles Thomas.
Blandenstein, K., Pliner, P. & (Eds.) (1980). Assessment and of
emotionalbehavior.NewYork:Plenum.
. . Thepsychologicalexamination ofthe child. New York: Wiley.
J. (1977). The Eysencks and Abnorm. Psychol, 86,
Block, J. (1977). P Scale and Psychosis: Continued Concerns./. Abnorm. Psychol., 86,
4,431-434.
Block, J. (1978). The method. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bloom, B. S. (1964). Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: Wiley.
Boring, E. G. (1957). A history of experimental psychology. NY: AppletonCenturyCrofts.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1982). [Review of Identical twins reared apart: A reanalysis.]
ContemporaryPsychology,2
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1982). [Review of The intelligence controversy.]
Jour- nal of Psychology,
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1983). Do environmental similarities explain the similarity in
intel- ligence of identical twins reared apart? Intelligence,

33 0

Bouchard, J., (1993). The genetic architecture of human intelligence. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Biological approaches to the study of human intelligence. Norwood, NJ:
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1993). Twins: Nature's twins told tale. In T. J. Bouchard, Jr., &
P. Propping (Eds.), Twins as tool of behavior genetics. Chichester, England: Wiley
& Sons Ltd.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1993a). Genetic and environmental influences on adult personality:
Evaluating the evidence. In I. Deary & J. Hettema (Eds.), Basic issues in
personality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Bouchard, T. J., Jr., & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: A review.
Science,
Bouchard, T. J., Jr., & Segal, N. L (1985). Environment and In B. J. (Ed.),
Handbookofintelligence:Theories,measurements,andapplications.NewYork:Wiley.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Lykken, D. ., McGue, M., Segal, N. L, & Tellegen, A. (1990).
Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota study of twins reared apart.
Science,250,223-8.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Lykken, D. ., McGue, M., Segal, N. & Tellegen, A. (1991). IQ
and heredity. Science,
Brody E. ., Brody N. (1976). Intelligence: Nature, determinants and consequences. New
York: Academic Press.
Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press. Bull, R & SprinS., Nichols, P., Kennedy W. (1975). Preschool prenatal and early developmental correlates. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1991). The nurture of nature. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(3),
390-1.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1993). Heredity, environment, arid the question
How? A first approximation. In R. & G. E. McClearn (Eds.), Nature,
nurture and psychology (p. 313-23). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Brown,F.G. ofEducationalandPsychologicalTesting(secondedition).
New York: Holt, & Winston.
Brozek, J. (1972). To test or not to test: trends in the Soviet History
ofthe BehavioralSciences,
Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction. American Psychologist,39,214-227.
Burks, ., & R. (1932). Is mental resemblance related to physical resemblance
in sibling Journal Genetic Psychology,
Burlatchuk L. F. (1994) Approach to Personality Study in Soviet Psychology: A Summary of Research // Rorschachiana. Yearbook of the International RorschachSociety,19,78-96.
BurlatchukL.F.(1998)Natural-scientificparadigminapsychologicalpersonalityassessment: Necessity of a return to psychology. Conference Abstracts. - 9th European
Con- ference on Personality. University of Surrey, July
Burt (1963). Is intelligence distributed normally? Journal

33 1

Butcher, N. psychologicalassessment:Apractitioner'sguide.New
York: Basic Books.
Caldwell, B. & Bradley, R. H. (1984). Home observation for the measurement of
the environment. Little Rock, AK: University of Arkansas Press.
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Recommendations for test standards
construct, trait, and discriminant validity. American Psychologist,
Capron, C, & M. (1989). Assessment of effects of socio-economic status on
in a full cross-fostering study. Nature,
Casaer, P. (1993). Old and new facts about perinatal brain Child
Psychology andPsychiatry, 34(1), -9.
Cattell R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their Structure, Growth and action. Boston: Houghton
Mifflin Co.
Cattell, R. (Ed.). (1983). Intelligence and national achievement. Washington, DC: The
Institute for the Study of Man.
Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual New
York: McGraw-Hill.
Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment.
JournalofEducationalPsychology,
Cattell, R. B. (1980). The heritability of fluid, gf, and crystallized gc, intelligence,
esti- mated by a least squares use of the MAVA method. British Journal of
Educational Psychology,
Cattell,R.B.(1987).Intelligence:Its growthandaction.NewYork:NorthHolland.
Cattell,R.B.(1957).Personalityandmotivation,structureandmeasurement.NewYork:
World Book.
Ceci, J. (1993). Contextual trends in intellectual development. Developmental Review,
Chipuer, H. M., R., L, G. E., &Nesselroade,J. R. (1993).
Genetic influence on family environment: The role of personality. Developmental
Psychology,
Ciminero, A. R., Calhoun, K. S. & Adams, H. E. (Eds.) (1977). Handbook ofBehavioral
Assessment (p. 509-554). New York: Wiley & Sons.
Cohen, R.J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Phillips, S. M. (1996).
Psychologicaltestingandassess- ment: An introduction to tests and measurement.
Mountain View, A: field.
Coon, H., Carey, G., & Fulker, D. W. (1990). A simple method of model fitting for
adop- tiondata.BehaviorGenetics,20,385-404.
Cooper,C, (Eds)(1997).Processesinindividualdifferences.London:Routledge.
Corcoran, K., & Fischer, J. (1994). Measures for A sourcebook (2nd ed.).
1-2). New York:
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika,
Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing. (3rd edition). New York:
Har- per & Row.
Cronbach,L.J.,&Gleser,G.C.(1965).Psychologicaltestsandpersonneldecisions.
na, University of Illinois Press.

33 2

Cronbach, L J., & P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. PsychologicalBulletin, -302.
Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: the
PASS. New & Bacon.
Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology andpsychotherapy built on myth. New
York: Free Press.
Denney, N.W., Palmer, A.M. (1981). Adult age differences on traditional and practical
problem-solving JournalofGerontology,
Detterman, D. K. (1993). Giftedness and intelligence: One and the same? In G. R. Bock
&K. (Eds.),The anddevelopmentofhighability. England:
Wiley.
Detterman, D. K. (1994). Intelligence and the brain. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), The
neurop- sychology of individual (p. 35-57). New York: Academic Press.
DuBois, P. H. (1966). A test-dominated society: China B.C. - 1905 A.D. In A. Anastasi (Ed.) Testingproblems in perspective, (p 29-36). Washington, D C : American
Council on Education.
Duncan D., Featherman D. L, Duncan B. (1972). Socioeconomic background and
achievement. New York: Seminar Press.
A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1992). The psychology of attitudes. San Diego, A: Harcourt
Janovich.
R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Edwards, A. J. (1971). Individual Mental Testing. I History and theories.
Scranton, PA: Intext Educational Publishers.
Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction. New York: AppletonEdwards, A. L. (1957). Thesocialdesirability variableinpersonality assessmentandresearch. New York: Dryden.
Edwards, A. L. (1970). The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories.
New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, Inc.
Eldelberg L. (ed.) (1968). Encyclopedia of psychoanalysis. New York: Free
Press. Elliott, C. D. (1990a). Ability Scales: Introductory and TechnicalHandbook.
San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Elwood, D. L., & R. H. (1972). Individual intelligence testing without the examiner: Reliability of an automated Journal Consulting and Clinical PsyExner, J. E. (1986). The comprehensive system (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
Exner,J.E.,Jr.(1993).TheRorschach:Acomprehensivesystem.Volume BasicFoundations (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Eysenck H. J. (1979). The structure and measurement of intelligence. Berlin:
Springer- Verlag.
Eysenck H. J. Comments psychosis and psychoticism: A reply to Bishop./. Psy86,
Eysenck H. J. Personality and factor analysis: A reply to Guilrofd. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 3,405-411.

33 3

Eysenck, H. J. (1971). The IQ argument: Race, intelligence and education. New


York: Library Press.
Eysenck J.,EysenckS.B.G.(1975a).Manual theEysenckpersonalityquestionnaire.
London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975b). TheEysenckPersonality
QuestionnaireMa- nual. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Eysenck H. J., Eysenck S. B. G. (1977). Comments block and
86,
EysenckH.J.,EysenckS.B.G.(1976). asa
ofpersonality.Lon- don: Hodder and Stoughton.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (Eds.). (1991). Improvement of behaviour as
a function of dietary supplementation. Personality and Individual Differences, 12,
329-65.
Fancher, R. E. (1985). The intelligence men: Makers of the controversy. New York:
W. W. Norton & Co.
Farber, S. L. (1981). Identical reared apart:A reanalysis. New York: Basic books.
Finegan, J. E., & Alien, N. J. (1994). Computerized and written questionnaires: are
they
equivalent? ComputersinHumanBehavior,
Fiske D. W. (1971). Measuring the concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine Co.
Fletcher, R. Science, ideology the media: The CyrilBurtscandal. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
R. (1984). The mean of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. PsychologicalBulletin, 95,
R. (1987). Massive IQgains in 14 nations: What IQtests really measure? PsychologicalBulletin,101,N
J. (1999). The discovery of over time. American Psychologist, 54, 1,
5-20.
Frank, G. (1983). The Wechsler Enterprise. Oxford: Press.
Fulker, D. W. (1975). [Review of The science and politics of IQ.] of
Psychology,
Gardner,H.(1983).Framesofmind:Thetheoryofmultipleintelligences.NewYork:Basic Books.
Gardner,H.(1993).Multipleintelligences:Thetheoryinpractice.NewYork:BasicBooks.
Goddard, H. H. (1913). The Binet tests in relation to
Asthenics,
Goddard, H. H. (1917). Mental tests and the Journal of Delinquency, 2,243277.
Goldberg L. R. (1963). Model of item ambiguity in personality assessment. and
Psychol.Measurement,
Goldberg, L. R. (1971). A historical survey of personality scales and inventories. In
P. McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment. Palo Alto: Science and
Behavior Books.
Goldstein, G. & Hersen, M. (Eds.) (1984). Handbook of psychological assessment
(pp. 181-210). NY: Press.
Goodwin, W. L., & Driscoll, L. A. (1980). Handbook for measurement and evaluation
in early childhoodeducation. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.

33 4

Gottschalk, L A., & Gleser, G. (1969). The measurement of psychological states


through the content analysis of verbal behavior. Los Angeles, CA: University of
California Press.
Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New W. W. Norton.
Graham, J. R., & Lilly, R. S. (1984). Psychological testing. Cliffs, NJ:
Pren- tice-Hall.
Green B. F. (1991). Guidelines for computer testing. B. Gutkin & S. L. Wise (Eds.).
The computer and the decision-making process. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Green B. F. (1988). Critical problems in computer-based psychological measurement.
AppliedMeasurementinEducation,
Greene, R. L. (1991). The MMPI-2/MMPI: An interpretive manual. Boston: &
Bacon.
Gregory, R.J. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Tests in Print
(1961).Griphon.
Gronbach L. J., Gleser G. (1965). Psychological Tests and Personnel decisions.
Gronlund, N. E. (1993). How to make achievement tests and assessments (5th ed.).
Bos- ton,MA:Allyn.
G. (1984), Handbook of Psychological Assessment, New York: Van
Nos- trand Reinhold Co.
Guastello, S. J., & M. L. (1990). The effect and validity of computerbased test interpretations: the Human Resource Development Report. Psychological
Assessment,
Guastello, S., Guastello, D., Craft L (1989). Assessment of the Barnum effect in
com- puter-based test Journal of 123,
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford J. P. (1975). Factors and factors of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 82,
4,
802-814.
Guilford J. P. (1977). Will the real factor of extraversion-introversion please stand up?
A reply to Eysenck. PsychologicalBulletin, 84,
Guilford J. P. (1980). Fluid and crystallized intelligences: Two fanciful concepts. PsychologicalBulletin,88,N
Guilford, J. P., & Zimmerman, W. S. (1956). The Temperament
Survey. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.
Guion, R. M. (1965). Personnel Testing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley.
Hall, S., & Lindzey, G. (1970). of personality. New York: Wiley.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Harmann, H. H. (1960). Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago, II: University of Chicago
Press.
Hartigan, J. A., & Wigdor, A. K. (1989). Fairness in employment testing.
Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
Hartman, D. E. (1986). Artificial intelligence or artificial psychologist? Conceptual issuesinclinicalmicrocomputeruse.Professional 17,528-534.

33 5

Hathaway S. R. Personality inventories. In Handbook of Clinical Psychology.


New York: McGraw-Hill, 451-475.
Hathaway, S. & J. C. (1943). Manual the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Hayes, W. L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Heilbrun . ., Blum N., Goldreyer N. (1985). Defensive projection. An investigation
of its role in paranoid Nerv. Ment. Dis., 173,
Henderson, N. (1990). Why do gene-environment interactions appear more often in
laboratory animal studies than in human behavioral genetics? Behavior and Brain Sciences,
Hendrickson, A. E., & Hendrickson, D. E. (1980). The biological basis for individual
differences in intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences,
Henerson, M. E., Morris, L. & Fitz-Gibbon, . . (1987). How to measure attitudes.
Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Hermann H. (1966). Theoretische Grundlagen der projektiven Tests. In Handbuch der
Psychologie, Gottingen: Verlag fur Psychologie, Bd.
Hermans, (1988). On the integration of nomothetic and idiographic research methods in the study of personal Journal Personality, 56,
Herrnstein, R. (1973). the Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press.
R. J., & Murray, The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure
in life. New York: Free Press.
E. M., Reiss, D., R. (Eds.) (1994). Separate social worlds of
sib- lings. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Hirsch, J. (1975). Jensenism: The bankruptcy of Science without scholarship. Educational Theory,
Hoffman, L. W. (1991). The influence of the family environment on personality: Accounting for sibling differences. Psychological Bulletin, 187-203.
Hogan, R., DeSoto, . ., & Solano, . (1977). Traits, tests, and personality research.
AmericanPsychologist,
Holmes D. S. (1968). Dimensions of projection. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 2, 248268.
Holmes D. S. (1978). Projection as a defense mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 4,
677-688.
Holmes D. S. (1981). Existence of classical projection and the stress-reducing function
of attributive projection: A reply to Sherwood. PsychologicalBulletin, 90, 3,460466.
Holt, R. R. (1958). Clinical and statistical prediction: A reformulation and some new
Journal ofAbnormal and Social Psychology,
Holt, R. R. Assessing personality. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Holt R. R. (1978). Methods in clinical psychology. New York: Plenum: Press, V.
Horn, J. L. (1968). Organization of abilities and the development of
intelligence. PsychologicalReview,
Horn, J. M., Loehlin, J. C, & L. (1979). Intellectual resemblance among
adoptive and biological relatives: The Texas Adoption Project. Behavior Genetics, 9,
177-207.

33 6

Hunt, J. M. Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald Press.


Hunt, T. & C.J. (Eds.) (1989). Testing older adults. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Jackson, D. N. (1975). Intelligence and ideology. Science,
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. (1994). Wide Range Achievement Test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Jenkins J.J.& D. G. (Eds.) Studies in individual differences. New York:
Jensen,A.(Ed.),Socialclass,raceandpsychologicaldevelopment.NewYork:Holt,Rinehart & Winston.
Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boost scholastic achievement? Harvard
Educational Review,
Jensen, A. R. (1972). Genetics and education. New York: Harper &
Row. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free
Press. Jensen, A. R. (1998). : Praeger Publishers.
Johnson, J. W. (1984). An overview of psychological testing. In M. D. Schwartz (Ed.),
Using computers in clinical practice (p. 131-134). New York: Haworth
Press. N. Individualandenvironment: twins rearedapart(revised edition of 1965 monograph). New York: International Universities Press.
L. J. (1974). The science andpolitics Hillsdale, NJ:
L. J. (1974). The science and politics Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Kaplan,R. &Sacuzzo,D.P.
(1993).Psychologicaltesting:Principles,applications,and issues (3rd ed.). Pacific
Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
Karoly,P.(Ed.) Measurementstrategiesinhealthpsychology.NewYork:Wiley.
Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the New York: Wiley.
Kaufman, A. S. Assessingadolescentandadultintelligence. Boston, MA: &
Bacon.
Kelley,T.L.(1927).Interpretationofeducationalmeasurements.NewYork:WorldBook
Company.
Kelley, T. L. (1928). Crossroads in the A study of mental
abili- ties. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Keyser, & Sweetland R. C. (1987) (Eds.). Test Compendium. Kansas City,
Test Corporation of
Keyser, D.J., & Sweetland, R. (Eds.) (1985). Test critiques (Vol. 1). Kansas City: Test
Corporation of America.
Kleinmuntz, B. (1967). Personality measurement. Homewood, The Dorsey Press.
Kleinmuntz, B. (1977).Personality measurement. New Krieger.
Kline, P. (1986). A handbook of test construction. New York: Methuen.
Kline, P. (1993). Personality. The psychometric view. London: Routledge.
Kline, P. The Handbook of Psychological Testing. London: Routledge.
Kline,P. Thenewpsychometrics.Science,psychologyandmeasurement.London:
Routledge.
., & Davidson, H. (1962). The Rorschach technique: An introductory manual.
New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Knobloch, H., & Pasamanick, B. (Eds.). (1974). Gesell and Amatruda's developmental
diagnosis (3d ed). New York: Harper & Row.

33 7

H., Stevens, F, & Malone, A. F. (1980). Manual of developmental diagnosis.


Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row.
Koson, D., Kitchen, C, Kochen, M., & D. (1970). Psychological testing by
computer: effect on response bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30,
803-810.
Kramer, D. A. (1983). Post formal operation? A need for further conceptualization.
Hu- manDevelopment,
Krug, S. E. (1987). Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Kansas City, Test Corporation of
L Resnick (Ed.) (1976). The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ:
Labouvie-Vief, G. (1982). Dynamic development and mature autonomy: A theoretical
prologue. Human Development,
Lambert, N. M. (1991). The crisis in measurement literacy in psychology and education.
EducationalPsychologist,
Lanyon, R. I. (1978). Psychological Screening Inventory: Manual (2nd ed.). Port
Huron, Research Psychologists Press.
Lanyon, R. I., & L. D. (1982). Personality Assessment (2nd ed.). New
York: Wiley.
D. (1974). Heritability analysis of scores: Science or numerology. Science,
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Ed.) (1954). Mathematical thinking in the socialsciences. Glencoe,
Free Press.
Leahy, A. M. (1935). Nature-nurture and intelligence. GeneticPsychologyMonographs,
Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald
Press. Lewicki A. (1969). Podstawy psychologicznej. In Psychologia
kliniczna.
Warszawa: PWN, 81-155.
Lewontin, R. (1975). Genetic aspects of intelligence. Annual Review of Genetics, 9,
387-405.
Lewontin, R. C, Rose, S., & L J. (1984). in ourgenes: Biology, ideology
and human nature. Pantheon: New York.
Lindzey G. (1961). techniques and Gross-culture research. New York:
Apple- ton.
Locurto, C. (1990). The malleability of judged from adoption studies. Intelligence,
Locurto, C. (1991). Sense and nonsense about IQ: The case for uniqueness. New
York: Loehlin, J. (1979). Combining data different groups in human behavior
genetics. In J. R. Royce & L. P. Mos (Eds.), Theoretical advances in behavior genetics
(pp. 303-34).
Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genetics andpersonality. Thousand Oaks,
Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Using for a simple analysis of the Colorado Adoption
Project
data on height and intelligence. Behavior Genetics, 22, 239-45.
Loehlin, J. C, & Nichols, R. C. (1976). Heredity, environment, personality: A study of
850 sets of twins. Austin: University of Texas Press.

33 8

LoehlinJ. , J. & L. (1981). Personality resemblance in adoptive


families. Behavior Genetics,
LoehlinJ. HornJ. M., & Willerman, L (1989). Modeling Evidence from
the Texas Adoption Project. Child Development,
LoehlinJ. HornJ. M., & Willerman, L. (1990). Heredity, environment, and personality change: Evidence from the Texas Adoption of Personality, 58,
221-43.
C, Willerman, & Horn J. M. (1987). Personality resemblance in adoptive
families: A 10-year ofPersonality and Social Psychology,
Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (Eds.). (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. NY:
Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York:
H. B. (1978). Test scores and what they mean. (3rd ed.).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Macfarlane, A. The psychology of childbirth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
Universi- ty Press.
Magnusson, D. (1976). Interactional Psychology and Personality. New York: Wiley
& Sons.
Magnusson, D., & Torestad, B. (1992). The individual as an interactive agent with
the environment. In W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik, & R. H. Price (Eds.), Personenvironment psychology: Models and perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Mahrer, A. A. (Ed.) (1970). Progress in experimental personality research. New
York: Academic Press.
Maloney, M. P., Ward, M. P. (1976). Psychological Assessment. A conceptual approach.
New York: University Press.
Maruish, M. (Ed.). (1994). Use of psychological testing for treatment planning and
out- come assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
D.(1972).Wechsler'smeasurementandappraisal adultintelligence(5th
ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
MatarazzoJ. D. Psychological assessment versus psychological testing: Validation from Binet to the school, clinic, and Psychologist, 45,9991017.
MatarazzoJ. D. (1992). Biological and physiological correlates of intelligence. Intelligence,257-8.
D. (1992). Psychological testing and assessment in the century. AmericanPsychologist,
McCall, R. B. (1993). Environment effects on intelligence: The forgotten realm of discontinuous nonshared within-family effects. Child Development,
McCartney, K., Harris, M. J., & Bernieri, F. (1990). Growing up and growing apart:
A development of twin studies. Psycholgical Bulletin,
McClelland, D. Personality. NY: Sloane.
McClelland, D. (1971). Assessing human motivation. New York: General Learning
Press.
McGue, M. (1989). Nature-nurture and intelligence. Nature, 340, 507-8.

33 9

McKelvie, S. J. (1992). Does memory contaminate test-retest of GeneticPsychology, 119,


McPherson F. Presly A. S., Armstrong J., Curtis R. H. (1974). and
psychotic illness. 125,
McReynolds, P. (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 2). Palo
Alto, CA: Science and Behavior B o o k s , Inc.
McReynolds, P. (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 5). San
Fran- cisco: Jossey-Bass.
P. E., Rosen A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of
psychomet- ric signs, patterns or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52,

Meehl,P.E.(1954).Clinicalversusstatisticalprediction:Atheoretical areview of the evidence. University of Minnesota Press.


R. (1969).PWN:Warszawa.
Melamed, T. (1992). Personality correlates of physical height. Personality and Individual
Merrell, K. W. (1994). Assessment of behavioral, social, and emotional problems.
NY: Longman.
Messick, S. (1960). Dimensions of social Journal of Consulting Psychology,
Messick, S. (1962). Response style and content measures from personality inventories.
EducationalandPsychologicalMeasurement,
Meyer, R. G. (1993). The clinician's handbook: Integrateddiagnostics, assessment
and intervention in adult and psychopathology. Needham Heights, MA:
& Bacon.
., & Davis, R. D. (1996). Disorders of personality: and beyond. New
York:Wiley.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
Mischel, W. (1977). On the future of personality measurement. American Psychologist,
Mischel, W. (1981). Introduction to personality (3d edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart
& Winston.
Misiak, H. & V. S. Sexton (1966). History of Psychology. New York: Grune &
Stratton. Moreland, K. L. (1987). Computerized psychological assessment: What's
available. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.). Computerized psychological assessment (p. 26-49).
New York:
Basic Books.
Moreland, K. L. (1991). Assessment of validity in computer-based test interpretations.
In T. B. Gutkin & S. L Wise (Eds.). The computer and the decision-making process
(p. 43-74). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Murstein, B. J. (1963). Theory and research in projective techniques (emphasizing
the
TAT). New York: John Wiley.
M. C, & Cardon, L. R. (Eds.) (1992). Methodologyforgenetic studies oftwins and
families. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Newman, H. H., F. N., & Holzinger, K. J. (1937). Twins: A study of
heredity and environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

34 0

Newmark,.S.(Ed.)(1985).Majorpsychologicalassessmentinstruments.Newton,MA:
& Bacon.
J. (1987). Computerized psychological testing: overview and ProPsychology:ResearchandPractice,
Nowak, S. (1965). Studia z metodologii nauk PWN:
Nowak, S. (1970).Metodologiabadan PWN: Warszawa.
Nowakowska M. (1976). Psychologia z Warszawa:
PWN.
C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. In Clinical
Diagnosis of Mental Disorders. A Handbook. New York: Plenum Press.
Nuttall, E. V., Romero, & (Eds.) Assessing
Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
O'Brien, N. P. (1988). Test construction. New York: Greenwood Press.
Office of Strategic Services Staff. (1948). Assessment men. New York: Holt, Rinehart
Winston. A.N.
(1992).Questionnairedesign,interviewingandattitudemeasurement.
London: Pinter Publishers.
Osgood, C, G. & P. (1957). The measurement of meaning.
University of Illinois Press.
Osterlind, S. J. (1983). item bias. Newbury Park, A: Sage Publications.
Osterlind, S. J. (1989). Constructing test items. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
J. (1983). Growing into human maturity: Toward a metasubjectiye theory of adulthood stages. In P. B. Baltes, G. Brim (Eds.). Life-span development
and behavior. V. 5. New York: Academic Press.
Pedersen, N. L, R., J. R., & McClearn, G. E. (1992). A quantitative genetic analysis of cognitive abilities during the second half of the PsychologicalScience,
Peterson, J. (1926). Early conceptions andtests of intelligence. NY: World Book
Company.
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Pletraslnski Z. (1975). Zdolnosci. In PWN, 735-762.
Plewicka Z. (1980). Podstawy diagnozy psychologicznej. In Stosowana psychologia wyWarszawa: PWN, 37-46.
Plomin, R. (1990). The role of inheritance in behavior, Science,
Plomin, R. (1994). Genetics and experience: The interplay between nature and nurture.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Plomin, R. (1994). The nature of nurture: Family environment. In R. Plomin (Ed.),
Ge- netic and experience: The interplay between nature and nurture (p. Beverly
Hills: Sage.
Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different
one another? Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Plomin, R., & J. M. (1992). Genetics and Current Directions in
PsychologicalScience,

34 1

R., J, C, & Fulker, D. W. (1988). Nature and nurture infancy


and early childhood. New Cambridge University Press.
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C, & J. C. (1977). Genotype-environment interaction
and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin,
Plomin, R., R. N., Braungart, J. M., J., Corley, R., Fulker, Kagan
J., Reznick, J. S., Robinson, J., C, & DeFries, J. (1993). Genetic
change and continuity from fourteen to twenty months: The MacArthur Longitudinal Twin Study. Child Development,
Plomin, R., Loehlin, J. C, & DeFries, J. C. (1985). Genetic and environmental
compo- nents of environmental influences. DevelopmentalPsychology, 21, 391402.
Plomin, R., G. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nesselroade, J. R., & Bergeman, C. S.
(1989). Genetic influence on childhood family environment perceived retrospectively from the last half of the lifespan. Developmental Psychology, 24, 738-45.
Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nesselroade, J. R., & Bergeman, C.
S. (1989).
Genetic
influences
on adults'
ratings of their current
ofMarriage the Family,
Plomin, R., Reiss, D., Hetherington,E. M., & Howe, G. W. (1994). Nature and
nurture: Genetic
contributions
to measures
of the family environment.
Developmental Psy- chology,
Prince, R., Guastello, S. (1990). The effect in computerized Rorschach interpretation system. of Psychology, 124,
R. J. (Ed.) (1986), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol.
3, p. 335-368). Hillsdale, NJ:
Rabin,A.I.(1968).Projectivetechniquesinpersonalityassessment:Amodernintroduction. New York: Springer.
Rabin, A. I. (Ed.) (1981). Assessment withprojective techniques. New York: Springer.
Rapaport, C, Gill, M., & Schafer, J. (1968). Diagnostic psychological testing (Vol.
1).
(Rev. Chicago: Year Book Publishers.
Richardson, K. (1991). Understanding intelligence. Philadelphia, PA: Milton Keynes.
Ritzier, B. A., Sharkey, K. J., & J. (1980). A comprehensive projective alternative to the Journal of Personality Assessment,
Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & L S. (1990). Measures of personality
and social psychological attitudes. San Diego, A: Academic Press.
P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.). Measures
ty and social psychological attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press.
Rogers, P., & Green, M. (1993). Dieting, dietary restraint and cognitive performance.
JournalofClinicalPsychology,32.
Rorschach, H. (1941). Psychodiagnostics. (Hans Huber Verlag, Bern: Bircher.
work published
Rose R. J. (1981). [Review of Farber, S. L., Identical twins reared apart: A reanalysis.]
Science,
Rosenzweig S. (1964). Investigating and appraising personality. In T. G. Andrews (ed).
Methods of Psychology. New York: Wiley, 539-568.
Rowe, D. (1994). The myth of family influences. New York: Guilford.

34 2

Rowe, D. . (1981). Environmental and genetic influences on dimensions of perceived


parenting: A twin study. Developmental
Rowe, D. (1983). biometrical analysis of perceptions of family environment: A
study of twin and singleton sibling kinships. Child Development,
Rowe, D. C. (1994). The limits of family influence: Genes, experience, and behavior. New
York: Guilford Press.
Rozensky, R. H., J.J., & Tovian, S. M. (1997). Psychologicalassessment in
medi- cal settings. New York: Plenun.
Rust,J.,Golombok,S.(1989).Modern Thescienceofpsychologicalassessment. London: Routledge.
SanockiW.(1978). wpsychologii.Warszawa:PWN.
Sarason, I. G. (Ed.) (1980). Test anxiety. Hillsdale, NJ:
Sattler, J. M. (1982). Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities (2nd
& Bacon.
Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
Scarr, S. (1981). Race, social class and individual differences in IQ: New studies of old
issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
S. (1989). Protecting general intelligence: Constructs and consequences for interventions.InR.L.Linn(Ed.),Intelligence:Measurement,theory,andpublicpolicy.
Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Scarr, S., & Grajek, S. (1982). Similarities and differences among siblings. In M. E. Lamb
& B. Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Sibling relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R. A. (1978). The influence of family background on intellectualattainment.AmericanSociologicalReview,43,674-92.
Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R. A. (1994). Educational and occupational achievements of
brothers and sisters in adoptive and biologically related families. Behavior Genetics
24(4), 301-25.
Scarr, S., & Yee, D. (1980). Heritability and educational policy: Genetic and environmental effects on IQ, aptitude, and achievement. Educational Psychologist,
Scarr, S., Weinberg, R. A., & I. D. (1992). correlations in adoptive families. Intelligence,
Schiff,M.,&Lewontin,R.(1986).Educationandclass:Theirrelevanceof studies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Schoenthaler, S. (1991). Improve your child's behaviour. London: Books.
Schoenthaler, S., Amos, S., Eysenck, H., Peritz, E., & Yudkin, J. (1991). Controlled
of vitamin-mineral supplementation: Effects on intelligence and performance. PersonalityandIndividualDifferences, -62.
Schroeder,L.D.,Sjoquist,D.L.,&Stephan,P.E.(1986).Understandingregressionanalysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (1995). Sourcebook ofadult assessment strategies. New
York: Plenum Press.
Semeonoff, B. (1976). Protective techniques. New
Shapiro,E.S.(1987).Behavioralassessmentinschoolpsychology.Hillsdale,NJ:
Associates.

34 3

M. F. (1979). Handbook ofcriterion-referencedtesting:Development, evaluation and use. New York: Garland STPM Press.
Sherman, S. W., & Robinson,N. M. (Eds.)
dilemma science, and thepublic. Washington, D. C: National
Acade- my Press.
Sherwood G. G. (1981). Self-serving biases in person perception: A of
projection as a mechanism of defence. Psychological Bulletin, 90,
Sherwood G. G. (1982). Consciousness and stress reduction in defensive projection:
A reply to Holmes. Psychol. Bulletin,
Shields, J. (1962). Monozygotic twins: Brought up apart and brought up together.
Lon- don: Oxford University Press.
Shimberg, B. (1981). Testing for licensure and certification. American Psychologist, 36,
1138-1146.
Slate, J. R., & Hunnicutt, L. C. (1988). Examiner errors on the Wechsler
ofPsychoeducationalAssessment,6,280-288.
Snider,J.G.,&Osgood,..(Eds.)(1969).Semantic Technique:A
book. Chicago, Aldine Publishing Co.
Snyder, R., Shenkel, R. J., & R. (1977). Acceptance of personality
inter- pretations: the Barnum effect and Journal Consulting and
Clinical Psy- chology,
Snyderman,M.,&Rothman,S.(1988).The controversy:Themediaandpublicpolicy.
New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
M. M. (Ed.) testing American society 1890-1930. New
Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Space, L. G. (1981). The computer as a psychometrician. BehaviorResearch Methods and
Instrumentation,13,596-606.
Spearman, (1904). General intelligence objectively determined and measured.
JournalofPsychology,0,201-293.
Spearman, (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and New York:
Macmillan.
Spitz, H. (1986). The raising ofintelligence. Hillsdale, NJ:
Stanley, J. C. (1973). Accelerating the educational progress of intellectually gifted
youths.Educational
State, J. R., Chick, D. (1989). examiner errors: Cause for concern.
Psychology for Schools, 26,
J. Jones, H. (1990). Identifying in administering the
R. PsychologyforSchools, 27,
Steinberg, Lanborn, S. D., S. M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement and encouragement to succeed. Child Development,
Sternberg, R. J. Beyond A triarchic theory of human intelligence.
Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence.
Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

34 4

R. J. (1994). Personality and Intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge


University Press.
Sternberg,R.J.(Ed.) Advancesinthepsychologyofhumanintelligence.Volumes
1-4. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1982). Handbook of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge
University Press. Sternberg,R.,Grigorenko,E.(Eds.)
(1997).Intelligence,Heredity,andEnvironment.New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Stoloff, M. & Couch, J. V. (Eds.) (1992). Computer use in A directory of
software (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American
PsychologicalrAssociation.
Stouffer, S. A. Guttman, L. Schuman, E. A. Lazarsfeld, P. F. Starr, S. A & Clausen J.
A. (Eds.) (1950). Measurement andprediction, (p. 362-412). Princeton, NJ:
University Press.
A. J. (1981). The testing trap. New York: Rawson, Wade.
Sundberg N. D., Tyier L. E. (1963). Clinical psychology. An introduction for research
and practice. New York: Plenum,
Suzuki, L. A., Meller, P. J., & Ponterotto, J. G. (Eds.) (1996). Handbook ofmulticultural
assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications. Englewood NJ:

Sweetland,R.C,&Keyser,D.J.(1991)Tests:Acomprehensive forassessment
in psychology, education, and business (2nd ed.). Kansas City: Test Corporation of
America.
Taubman, P. (1976). The determinants of earnings: Genetics, family, and other
environ- ment; a study of white, male twins. Economic Review,
Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1985). Heredity and familial environment in intelligence and educational level a sibling study. Nature,
Tallent, N. (1993). Psychological report (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Pren- tice-Hall.
Taylor, H. F. (1980). The A methodological inquiry into the heredity
ment controversy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Tomlinson-Keasey, C, & Little, T. D. (1990). Predicting educational attainment,
occu- pational achievement, intellectual skill and personal adjustment among
gifted men and JournalofEducational
Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1986). The influence of paternal social class on
intelli- gence and educational level in male adoptees and non-adoptees. Journal
of EducationalPsychology,
L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
L. M., & Merril, M.A. (1960). Scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1937). Measuring intelligence. Boston, MA: HoughtonTerman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
Tests in Print IV (1994).
Tests in Print V (1999). BCMM.
Tests in Print (1974). Griphon.

34 5

Tests in Print (1983).


The 1938 Mental Measurement Yearbook (1938). Griphon.
The 1940 Mental Measurement Yearbook (1940). Griphon.
The Eight Mental Measurement Yearbook (1978). Griphon.
The Eleventh Mental Measurement Yearbook (1992). BIMM.
The Fifth Mental Measurement Yearbook (1959). Griphon.
The Fourth Mental Measurement Yearbook (1953). Griphon.
The Ninth Mental Measurement Yearbook (1985). BIMM.
The Seventh Mental Measurement Yearbook (1972). Griphon.
The Sixth Mental Measurement Yearbook Griphon.
The Tenth Mental Measurement Yearbook (1989). BIMM.
The Thelth Mental Measurement Yearbook (1995). BCMM.
The Thierteenth Mental Measurement Yearbook (1998). BCMM.
The Third Mental Measurement Yearbook (1949). Griphon.
Thompson, L. A., Detterman, D. K., & R. (1993). Cognitive abilities and scholastic achievement: Genetic overlap but environmental differences. Psychological
Thorndike, E. L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence. New York: Teacher's College, Columbia University.
Thorndike, R. & E. P. (1977). Measurement evaluation in Psychology and
Education. (4th edit.). New York: Wiley.
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, No. 1.
Tryon,W.W. ActivitymeasurementinPsychologyandMedicine.NewYork:Plenum Press.
Turkheimer, E. (1991). Individual and group differences in adoption studies of PsychologicallBulletin,
Vernon, P. A. (Ed.). (1993). Biological approaches to the study of human intelligence.
NJ:
Vernon, P. E. (1950). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.
Vernon, P. E. (1960). The structure ofhuman abilities (rev. ed.). London: Methuen.
Vernon, P. E. (1961). The structure ofhuman abilities (2nd ed.). London: Methuen.
Vernon, P. E. (1964). Personality assessment: A critical survey. London: Methuen.
Wachs, T. H. (1992). The nature ofnurture. Newbury Park, A: Sage.
Wade . , Baker . . (1977). Opinions and use of psychological tests: A survey of
clinical psychologists. American Psychologist, 32,
Wahlsten, D. (1990). Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment
interaction. Behavior and Brain Sciences,
H. (1987). The first four millennia of mental testing: From Ancient China to
the computer age. Educational TestingService Research Report, 87-34.
Watkins, C, Campbell, V, Manus, M. (1990). Personality assessment training in counseling psychology programs Personality Assessment, 55,
Wechsler, D. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Baltimore,
MD: Williams & Wilkins.
Wechsler, D. (1975). Intelligence defined and undefined: A relativistic approach.
canPsychologist,

34 6

Weinberg, R. A. (1983). The Minnesota Adoption Studies: Genetic differences and malleability.ChildDevelopment,
Weiss V. (1980). The psychophysiological equivalent of the majorgene locus
ofgeneral intelligence. XXII International Congress of Psychology. Leipzig, V.
398.
Wetzler, Marlowe, D. (1994). Clinical Psychology by computer? The state of the
Art.EuropeanJournalofPsychologicalAssessment,10,
White, R. K. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievePsychological Bulletin,
Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Williams S. A., Denney N. W., Schadler M. (1983). Elderly adult's perception of their
own cognitive development during the adult years. of Aging and
HumanDevelopment,
Wodrich, D. & S. A. (1990). Children's psychological testing (2nd edit.).
Balti- more, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Wolber, G.J., & W. F. (1993). reports: A guideforclinicians.
Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
. . (1985) (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. New York: Wiley.
Woodworth, R. S. (1920). Personal Data Sheet. Chicago, Stoelting.
Zajons R. ., Markus G. B. (1975). Birth order and intellectual development.
1,74-88.,
Zieziula,F.R.(Ed.)(1982).Assessmentofhearing-impairedpeople.Washington,D C :
Gallaudet College.

264

70
294
289
34, 285, 286

167
167



166
167

74

28




- 128
126, 128,

145
129
145





152

136,138
136, 137


240
199,
203, 205-207, 216, 245, 246
237

223-225, 227-230
248, 251
202, 209
218
210,
211
234, 235, 237
212, 215
212


15
15

176

-
136

217-223

(/) 23, 66, 78, 250
70, 181, 189-191,
192,213,227
229
248
,
208,241

180
179
,
237, 248
178,
261
26, 279
190

182,
196
25, 186
24
44, 75, 182
37, 184
185,189
188


192,
184-186
24, 25,
182, 196
70, 181, 191, 192, 227, 230
- 190, 191

348

15
29

131,132




108

109
108
12

109
161
162
161

162
109

255
256
111
256
256
256
- 111

256
256
256
256
256
256
278, 280

275
, 274
276
263

265
266, 267, 270, 271
272
264

258
265, 266
262
258
256
131

37, 86, 87, 89


157
138
131
131
- 92
62, 139, 141, 306
290
294
-



305

315
295
295
294
293
293
291
292
-
291
-
293
294

288
289
287
290
290
289
289
286, 287
290, 291


143-146

141
139-141



95,96,10 5


107


8
104



104



104
.
. 56
. 56, 63
1960- . 63, 69
. 69, 72
76
. 77, 80
XX . 26-28

85

37, 89, 96

9,
20, 195,209,224,239,314
15


113


110, 177, 181,
196,


61
- 84

147

120-123

181

156
181, 289, 291
156, 157

109, 139, 167, 171,


173

69, 81
63

75,


148,304

247

227
227
42
() 189,191

168,169
82
145

13
124, 126

349

58, 162,
256, 276
165
165
179, 184
163, 164, 173
260
85

82
83


()

(16%)

z-

-0,99

+0,99

.
.
.
.
.
.
. , .
.

05784 07.09.01.
07.09.05. 70X100/16. . . . . 3500 . 2891.
. 194044, -, . . , . 29.
005-93, 2;

. . .
.
-, ., 15.


, ,
,

, 1- , .; ./ (095)
e-mail:
- . , . ., . 29;
./ e-mail: sales@piter.com
. 25 , . 4; ./ (0732) -70;
e-mail:

. 8 , . 205; ./ (343) 225-39-94, 225-40-20;


e-mail:
. , . . 41
e-mail:
. -, . 502;
./ (383) e-mail: piter-sib@risp.ru
-- . , . 26; . (863) 269-91 -22, 269-9130;
e-mail: jupiter@rost.ru
. , . 33, . 225; . (846) 77-8979;
e-mail: pitvolga@samtel.ru

. , . ./
751-10-02, (0572) 58-41-45; e-mail: piter@kharkov.piter.com

. , . . 33; (10-38-044)
e-mail: office@piter-press.kiev.ua

. , . 3; ./ (10-375-17) 226-19-53;
e-mail: office@minsk.piter.com
,
. : 703-73-73.
E-mail: grigorjan@piter.com
.
: -
- (095) 974-34-50.
: 703-73-73.
- e-mail: kozin@piter.com

Вам также может понравиться