Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ActuAl trends
of bronze Age ArchAeology
in the north cAucAsus
-
26 2016
2016
902/904
63.4
56
..
/ . . .. . :
; - , 2016. 38 .
ISBN 978-5-906137-74-6
, -
.
, ,
.
-
,
, , -
.
, 2016
ISBN 978-5-906137-74-6 , 2016
German Archaeological Institute Nasledie Stavropol
The Administration for Protection and Maintenance of Cultural Heritage
of the Republic of Adygea
The Northern-Caucasus branch of the State Museum of Oriental Art
International conference
2-6 may 2016
Maykop Stavropol
Stavropol 2016
ISBN 978-5-906137-74-6
.. 7
:
Ju.Ju. Piotrovskij 10 Burials of the Maikop culture in the North Caucasus:
past and present perspectives
.. 13 C-
:
()
V.R. Erlikh 15 Unresolved Questions in the History of the Northwest
Caucasus during the late Bronze Age: Migration and
(or) Autochthonous development
. 17 Bioarccaucasus ,
..
S. Hansen 19 Bioarccaucasus mobility, migration
A.B. Belinskij and demographic change in the Bronze Age of North
Caucasia
. 21
S. Reinhold 23 Bronze Age in the Northern Caucasus open
questions on subsistence and mobility
.. 24
..
.
N.Ya. Berezina 27 The potential
A.P. Buzhilova of paleoanthropological studies
Ju. Gresky on Caucasian Bronze Age populations
. 33
:
C. Knipper 35 Bronze Age diet and mobility in south-
ern Russian steppes: Insights from
stable isotope analyses
.. 36
. -3 (-
) -
,
, ,
S.L. Pichler 37 The Arbon Bleiche 3 Neolithic
C. Gerling lakeshore settlement (Switzerland)
diversity in resource exploitation re-
flected in archeological, archeozoologi-
cal, archeobotanical and stable isotope
data
. 26 2016
. 7
, .-,
, -
,
XIX XX.
.
-
.
50-
, , 70- ,
. -
. -
.
.
/
.
.
,
-
. 26 2016
. - 9
, ,
, , -
.
.
-
, -
. 90- ..
-
(28, -
1)
, -
-
, -
, , .
I () -
-
.
.
-
.
. 26 2016
that should be specific for the one or the other group, 11
which are nearly synchronous local variants.
The chronological position of these sites
changed during this period from an Eneolithic to an
Early Bronze Age affiliation, again without precise
criteria. Even more problematic is the radiocarbon
chronology. The problem is less the method as such,
as the treatment of these dates. They were rated
sometimes only as a the second level of argumen-
tation, because in some cases they do not support
the periodization based on the stratigraphy of the ar-
chaeological sites at all. As a result, in some cases,
similar complexes are separated by hundreds of
years, or the secondary burial is older than the pri-
mary complex in the same mound.
The change in the chronological position of
these sites also dramatically changes the system
of external contacts. The assumption the emrgence
Maikop groups with an Near Eastern origin was first
discussed on the basis of the Cis- and Transkuban
sites. It is, however, difficult it judge this period from
the archaeological basis. Parts of the wealthy ar-
chaeological complexes show the presence of ar-
tifacts with a probable southern origin. For a long
time it was assumed, that the diffusion of the Mai-
kop culture in the North Caucasus proceeded from
the west to the east. The discovery of entire new
groups of archaeological sites in Azerbaijan, that
are analogous to the North-Caucasian ones, how-
ever, turned the direction of a possible intrusion of
such southern populations. At the moment it rath-
er looks likely, that such an intrusion originated in
the east. This, however, raise many new questions
that first of all relate to the chronology.
To solve a whole serial of answersmuch hope
had been put on anthropological materials. Those
studies, however, are strongly biased by the inter-
. 26 2016
. 13
,
, .,
C-
:
()
-
,
,
. -
,
-
, -
, I. .. IV...
,
,
,
-
,
I. ..
-
-
, , .
, ,
. 26 2016
Vladimir R. Erlikh 15
Dr. Hist., Department of Material Culture and Ancient art, State
Oriental Museum, Moscow, Russia
. 26 2016
17
, , -
,
.,
.
, ,
. ,
Bioarccaucasus ,
XIX ,
. , -
III . . . - -
.
,
, , -
, -
.
,
-
. -
,
-
.
, -
, -
. 26 2016
Svend Hansen 19
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c., Director, Eurasia-Department, German
Archaeological Institute, Berlin, Germany
Andrej B. Belinskij
Dr., Nasledie Ltd., Stavropol, Russia
. 26 2016
21
,
, .,
-
,
-
-
.
, -
,
, -
, -
. -
-
, -
, -
. ,
-
-
.
,
, -
-
. 26 2016
Sabine Reinhold 23
PD Dr., Eurasia-Department, German Archaeological Institute,
Berlin, Germany
-
. -
, -
. -
,
,
.
-
. 26 2016
, - 25
,
-
.
170 -
, -
,
,
.
-
, ,
-
-
.
-
.
, -
, .
.
-
,
, , -
-
.
-
,
, -
. 26 2016
Natalia Ya. Berezina 27
Anuchin Research Institute and Museum of Anthropology,
Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Aleksandra P. Buzhilova
Dr. Hist., corresponding member of the Russian Academy
of Sciences , Anuchin Research Institute and Museum of
Anthropology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Julia Gresky
Dr. med., Department of Natural Sciences, German
Archaeological Institute, Berlin, Germany
The potential
of paleoanthropological studies on Caucasian
Bronze Age populations
. 26 2016
29
, , -
. , .,
, -
.
, .,
-
-
,
.
,
/
-
. ,
, -
, ,
,
.
, -
, , , -
-
, -
. 26 2016
Johannes Krause 31
Prof. Dr., Director, Max Planck Instiute for the Science of
Human History, Jena, Germany
Wolfgang Haak
Dr., Group leader Molecular Anthropology, Max Planck Instiute
for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany
. 26 2016
33
,
. , ., .
,
, ,
, ,
.
:
,
, -
, -
, ,
, .
-
. -
-
-
,
. -
-
, , -
.
,
. 26 2016
Corina Knipper 35
Dr., Isotope Group, Curt-Engelhorn-Centre Archaeometry,
Mannheim, Germany
-3 ()
,
,
,
- 3,
(),
-
. -
(33843370 . . ), , -
,
.
-
, , -
,
-
, -
.
. 26 2016
Sandra L. Pichler 37
PD Dr., Integrative Prehistory and Archaeological Science,
University Basel, Swizzerland
Claudia Gerling
Dr., Integrative Prehistory and Archaeological Science,
University Basel, Swizzerland
- ,
. , . , 88.
. 8 (8652) 75-06-09.
355017, . , . , 56.
. (8652) 26-79-44
nasledie@nasledie.org
www.nasledie.org