Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
K H A n – L e w i s
P h o n o l o g i c a l
AN a l y s i s
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
M A N U A L
M A N U A L
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Linda M. L. Khan and Nancy P. Lewis
800.627.7271
www.PearsonClinical.com Product Number 0158012879
ADMINISTRATION
Linda M. L. Khan and Nancy P. Lewis
OR RESALE
Warning: No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system,
without the express written permission of the copyright owner.
Pearson, PSI design, PsychCorp, KLPA, Q-global, and Q-interactive are trademarks, in the U.S. and/or
other countries, of Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates.
Acknowledgments��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������viii
1 Overview ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1
Uses ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1
Content and Organization ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1
KLPA–3 Core Phonological Process Analysis������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 1
KLPA–3 Supplemental Phonological Process Analysis ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 2
KLPA–3 Consonant Analysis and Vowel Analysis������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 2
Scores ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 2
SAMPLE,
Analysis Completion Time ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 2
Test Components ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 2
Manual ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 2
NOT FOR
Analysis Form������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 3
Sound Change Booklet��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3
Digital Options Available for the KLPA–3������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 3
ADMINISTRATION
Rationale for the KLPA–3�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3
Pairing with the GFTA ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4
Goals for the Revision ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4
OR RESALE
Examiner Qualifications������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 4
KLPA–3 User’s Responsibilities����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4
NOT FOR
Determining Processes per Word���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 29
Determining the Total Raw Score �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 29
Completing the Score Summary����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 30
ADMINISTRATION
Step 1. Convert Total Raw Score to Standard Score �������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 30
Step 2. Determine Confidence Intervals���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 31
Step 3. Determine Percentile Ranks���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 31
OR RESALE
Step 4. Determine Age Equivalents������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 31
Determining the Percent of Occurrence for Core Phonological Processes������������������������������������������������������ 32
Completing the Vowel Alterations Section ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 32
Completing the Dialectal Influence Section������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 32
Completing the Overall Intelligibility Section ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 32
Determining the Percent of Occurrence for Supplemental Phonological Processes and Vowel Alterations ��� 33
Calculating Processes per Word ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 33
Completing the Consonant Analysis����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 33
Phonetic Inventory for Consonants in Single Words �������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 33
Core Phonological Process Analysis Table ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 35
Summary of Consonant Analysis ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 35
Completing the Vowel Analysis ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 35
Phonetic Inventory for Vowels in Single Words ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 35
Vowel Phonological Process Usage Table�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 36
Summary of Vowel Analysis ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 36
SAMPLE,
Case Studies ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 42
Case Study A (Female, Age 2:10) ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 42
History and Referral ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 42
NOT FOR
Referral Questions �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 42
Score Results���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 43
Recommendations and Follow-up�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 44
ADMINISTRATION
Case Study B (Male, Age 6:3) ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 45
History and Referral ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 45
Referral Questions �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 45
OR RESALE
Score Results���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 45
Recommendations and Follow-up�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 47
Case Study C (Female, Age 7:9) ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 47
History and Referral ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 47
Referral Questions �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 48
Score Results���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 48
Recommendations and Follow-up�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 50
SAMPLE,
Evidence of Reliability ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 59
Evidence of Internal Consistency ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 59
NOT FOR
Standard Error of Measurement and Confidence Intervals ������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 60
Evidence of Test-Retest Stability ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 61
Evidence of Inter-Scorer Agreement������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 62
ADMINISTRATION
Evidence of Validity ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 63
Evidence Based on Test Content����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 63
KLPA–3 Content and Scope ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 64
OR RESALE
Evidence Based on Response Processes ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 64
Evidence Based on Relationships With Other Variables������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 65
Correlation With the KLPA–2 ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 65
Evidence Based on Special Group Studies ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 66
Individuals Diagnosed With a Speech Sound Disorder ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 67
Diagnostic Accuracy ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 69
Summary of Reliability and Validity Evidence ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 71
Appendix A Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample
by Age and Sex������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 73
Appendix B Age Equivalents for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex��������������������������������������������������������� 163
Appendix C Suppression and Occurrence of the Phonological Processes in the Normative Sample
by Age��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 165
Appendix D List of Examiners for the Tryout and Standardization Research Phases����������������������������������� 169
Appendix E Phonetic Symbols and Diacritics for Transcription ��������������������������������������������������������������������������175
Appendix F Reproducible Pages ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������177
References ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 181
Figures
SAMPLE,
Figure 3.1 Sample Page From the Sound Change Booklet������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 25
Figure 3.2 Calculating Chronological Age �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 26
Figure 3.3 KLPA–3 Examples of CS and SR Scored Responses ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 28
NOT FOR
Figure 3.4 KLPA–3 Examples of DIC and DMC Scored Responses ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 28
Figure 3.5 KLPA–3 Examples of VOC and CS Scored Responses ������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 29
ADMINISTRATION
Figure 3.6 Calculating the KLPA–3 Total Raw Score ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 30
Figure 3.7 Locating the KLPA–3 Standard Score ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 31
Figure 3.8 Completed KLPA–3 Score Summary������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 32
OR RESALE
Figure 3.9 Calculating the Percent Of Occurrence for Phonological Processes���������������������������������������������������������� 32
Figure 3.10 Completed Consonant Analysis����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 34
Figure 3.11 Completed Vowel Analysis ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 36
Figure 4.1 The Normal Curve and Its Relationship to Standard Scores and Percentile Ranks on the KLPA–3 ����������� 37
Figure 4.2 Example of Score Ranges for 90% and 95% Confidence Intervals������������������������������������������������������������ 39
Figure 5.2 Sample Page From the Sound Change Booklet������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 56
Figure 6.1 Possible Outcomes of Positive Predictive Power (+) and Negative Predictive Power (–)���������������������������� 70
T
he development of a robust assessment tool required the assistance and support of many professionals.
We would like to thank the many members of the Pearson family who, through their dedication and support,
guided the development of the Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis (3rd. ed.; KLPA–3) as a companion tool to the
Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation (3rd. ed.; GFTA–3). We are grateful to each and every one of them. Special thanks to
Ron Goldman and Macalyne Fristoe for the privilege of collaborating with them on these projects.
Senior research director Shannon Wang guided the project from beginning to end. Her team included research director
Marie Sepulveda and senior clinical assessment developer Elsa Tijerina. Nancy Castilleja, senior product line manager,
ensured that the project was on point and that the initial vision of the KLPA–3 was upheld throughout development and
maintained the same standards as KLPA and KLPA–2. Project manager Jill Tudyk’s organization and skill kept the project
on target.
The field research team, led by director Victoria Locke, was tasked with collecting all the samples throughout tryout and
standardization. The digital adaptation of the KLPA–3 for Q-interactive required the dedication and diligence of many
individuals in its creation and successful development. Kristen Getz, research director, managed the Q-interactive portion
SAMPLE,
of the project throughout the development of the test. Jennifer Japhet, research assistant, and Kami Buss, field research
coordinator, trained all Q-interactive field examiners. We are grateful to all the individuals who gave their time and effort to
the data collection.
NOT FOR
The psychometrics staff, led by Dr. Jianjun Zhu, director of Clinical Psychometrics, added their expertise throughout the
project. Special thanks goes to Dr. Ou Zhang, psychometrician, and Suping Jin, statistical analyst, who provided their
knowledge and skills during all phases of data analysis and final norms development.
ADMINISTRATION
It is imperative that all components are easy to understand and use. Jeffrey Miller, editor, deserves our gratitude for
ensuring that the manuals were well written and the Sound Change Booklet was accurate. Janet Smith, senior graphic
designer, provided an elegant and user-friendly design for the analysis form.
Field testing is a time-consuming process and would not have been successful without the efforts of the speech-
OR RESALE
language pathologists who participated as examiners. Without their tenacity and perseverance in locating and testing
individuals before and after school, on weekends, and even holidays, this analysis would not exist. We sincerely thank the
participants, especially the youngest of them, for their patience in responding to the many test items.
To the many clinicians who have expressed to us their appreciation of just how clinically useful the previous editions of
the KLPA have been, thank you. As speech-language clinicians ourselves, we developed this assessment tool with you
in mind.
Finally, we would like to extend our heartfelt gratitude to the thousands of amazing children, along with their amazing
families, who have taught us so much more than we could ever have imagined throughout our careers. The KLPA–3 is
dedicated to them.
Linda Khan and Nancy Lewis
September 2015
T
he Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis, (3rd ed.; KLPA–3) is a revision of the Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis
(2nd ed.; KLPA–2; Khan & Lewis, 2002). The KLPA–3 is a norm-referenced, in-depth analysis of phonological
process usage for children, adolescents, and young adults ages 2:0–21:11. Designed as a companion tool to the
Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation (3rd ed.; GFTA–3; 2015), the KLPA–3 makes use of the target words elicited by the
GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Words test to provide further diagnostic information about an individual’s speech sound abilities.
The KLPA–3 is designed for a speech-language pathologist to analyze an individual’s production of target words for
any sound changes and to identify the phonological processes used to produce those sound changes. The KLPA–3
phonological processes are separated into two categories: Core Phonological Processes, which are frequently occurring
and considered to be developmental; and Supplemental Phonological Processes, which occur less frequently but are
evidenced by individuals with speech sound disorders. A third group of phonological processes is discussed in this
SAMPLE,
Manual, but they not are listed on the KLPA–3 Analysis Form. These other phonological processes occur infrequently and
are typically indicators of disordered speech. The KLPA–3 also includes eight phonological processes impacting vowel
sound changes that can be summarized on the Analysis Form.
Uses
NOT FOR
The KLPA–3 can help you:
ADMINISTRATION
■■ determine if an individual has a speech sound disorder in the area of phonology,
■■ determine eligibility for speech services in conjunction with other supporting evidence,
■■ identify which phonological processes an individual demonstrates most often,
identify which phonological processes may interfere with an individual’s intelligibility of speech,
OR RESALE
■■
SAMPLE,
data indicate that individuals with speech sound disorders use these phonological processes. They are, therefore,
included for qualitative analysis purposes and to help plan for intervention.
NOT FOR
The KLPA–3 also provides space for further analysis of consonant and vowel sound productions. These analyses can
play an important role in treatment planning by contributing more information to an individual’s speech sound profile.
ADMINISTRATION
Scores
The KLPA–3 yields norm-referenced scores (standard scores, percentile ranks, age equivalents). The KLPA–3 standard
score is derived from the analysis of phonological processes corresponding to productions of the consonant and
OR RESALE
consonant cluster sounds in the the GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Words test.
Scores are reported for females and males in the following intervals:
Ages 2:0–6:11 2-month intervals
Ages 7:0–8:11 3-month intervals
Ages 9:0–10:11 6-month intervals
Ages 11:0–13:11 1-year intervals
Ages 14:0–21:11 2-year intervals
Test Components
Manual
The Manual provides information on the rationale and development of the KLPA–3, the definitions and examples of
the phonological processes, the use of the Sound Change Booklet to complete the Analysis Form, the calculation and
interpretation of standard scores, the standardization and norms development procedures, the evidence of reliability and
validity, and six appendixes.
SAMPLE,
Digital Options Available for the KLPA–3
At the time of publication, digital options are available on two digital platforms: Q-global (a web-based administration
and scoring platform) and Q-interactive (an interactive digital platform using two digital tablets that work together with a
NOT FOR
Bluetooth® connection). Because digital products are updated frequently, refer to www.PearsonClinical.com for the most
current information.
ADMINISTRATION
Rationale for the KLPA–3
The KLPA–3, like its predecessors, attempts to combine the advantages of traditional methods, the distinctive-feature
approach, and phonological analysis for examining sound changes.
OR RESALE
Traditionally, speech-language pathologists examined individuals’ speech production for individual phoneme changes.
In these analyses, sound changes were described as substitutions, distortions, and omissions of target phonemes. They
were further described with regard to their position within a word (i.e., initial, medial, final). Thus, results from traditional
analyses provided speech-language pathologists with a list of individually misarticulated phonemes by type of sound
change and position. Although these results provided useful information, sound changes sometimes appeared to be
random or inconsistent, particularly for very young children or older individuals whose speech was unintelligible.
Speech sound assessments have also attempted to examine changes in distinctive-features (Fisher & Logemann, 1971).
A change in one distinctive feature, such as continuancy, may have explained a number of changes that had appeared
to be random or inconsistent across several phonemes. A review of the sound change patterns that arise assist in
intervention planning.
The KLPA was developed to identify the phonological processes that account for various types of sound changes,
including those related to context. Context, or environment, can be important in determining sound change patterns.
What appear to be random sound changes on an articulation test may be reasonably explained by examining context
and patterns. Both consonants and vowels can influence the production of a target consonant. For example, a child may
say frog as [fwɔg], green as [grin], and brother as [bwʌðɚ]. In examining the inconsistent use of /r/ in clusters, the context
appears to be the reason. The pattern may be that when /r/ is adjacent to a labial consonant (/f/ and /b/), it is produced as
a [w], which is also labial. The influence of the phonemic environment was referred to as “coarticulatory context” as early
as 1968 (Daniloff & Moll, 1968) and continues to be the focus of research in children and adults (Goffman, Smith, Heisler,
& Ho, 2008; Recasens, 2002).
SAMPLE,
reflect changes made in GFTA–3 (e.g., new target words),
■■
NOT FOR
provide a qualitative analysis of an individual’s responses,
■■ introduce a digital edition of the analysis, and
■■ provide a vowel analysis that includes a phonetic inventory of vowels and vowel phonological processes.
ADMINISTRATION
Examiner Qualifications
The KLPA–3 should be scored and interpreted by speech-language pathologists who have knowledge about speech
OR RESALE
sound disorders. Moreover, they must have in-depth knowledge of phonetics and transcription using the International
Phonetic Alphabet (IPA).
The KLPA–3 is used to determine if an individual has a speech sound disorder in the area of phonology and to provide
metrics to gauge the severity of the disorder. Score results may help you determine treatment goals. Therefore, while
individuals with various degrees of training and experience (e.g., speech scientists, linguists) can evaluate speech sound
production, only speech-language pathologists should make decisions concerning diagnosis, intervention, and prognosis.
SAMPLE,
individuals who have numerous vowel changes in their production of target words.
NOT FOR
Core Phonological Processes
Manner
DF Deaffrication
ADMINISTRATION
GL Gliding of liquids
ST Stopping of fricatives and affricates
STR Stridency deletion
VOC Vocalization
OR RESALE
Place
PF
VF
Reduction
Palatal fronting
Velar fronting
CS Cluster simplification
DFC Deletion of final consonant
SR Syllable reduction
Voicing
FDV Final devoicing
IV Initial voicing
SAMPLE,
FV Final voicing
NDEN Interdentalization
LAB Labialization
NOT FOR
METAT Metathesis
(+)NAS Nasalization
PAL Palatalization
ADMINISTRATION
(+)STR Stridency addition
Dentalized productions
Lateralized productions
Vowel nasalization
OR RESALE
Idiosyncratic processes
Interacting processes
Interfering processes
Processes applied selectively
Reduplication
Sound preference
SAMPLE,
It results in fricatives /f/, /v/, /ɵ/, /ð/, /s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/, and /h/.
NOT FOR
chair /ʧɘr/ [sɘr] /ʧ/ [s]
watch /wɑʧ/ [wɑʃ] /ʧ/ [ʃ]
vegetable /vɘʤtəbəl/ [bɘðtəbəl] /ʤ/ [ð]
GL
ADMINISTRATION
Gliding of liquids
The individual produces the liquids /l/ and /r/ as glides /w/ and /j/.
OR RESALE
Examples of gliding of liquids (GL)
VOC Vocalization
The individual replaces word-final liquid /r/ or word-final syllabic liquids—/əl/ and /ɚ/—with a vowel.
Note. The syllabic liquids in all KLPA–3 target words are word-final. For scoring consistency of VOC, the word-final
syllabic liquid becomes a vowel without the /l/ or /r/.
SAMPLE,
door /dɔr/ [dɔo] /r/ [o]
teacher /tiʧɚ/ [tiʃə] /ɚ/ [ə]
apple /æpəl/ [æpo] /əl/ [o]
NOT FOR
Place
PF Palatal fronting
The individual fronts the palatal fricatives /ʃ/ or /ʒ/ or affricates /ʧ/ or /ʤ/. Typically, they are fronted to the alveolar ridge
ADMINISTRATION
resulting in the alveolars /t/, /d/, /n/, /s/, /z/, and /l/, and sometimes /ts/ and /dz/. /ts/ and /dz/ occur infrequently and are
included in the Additional Sound Changes column in the Sound Change Booklet.
OR RESALE
Target Word Word Change Sound Change
shoe /ʃu/ [su] /ʃ/ [s]
watch /wɑʧ/ [wɑts] /ʧ/ [ts]
juice /ʤus/ [dus] /ʤ/ [d]
VF Velar fronting
The individual fronts velars /k/, /g/, and /ŋ/ to alveolars /t/, /d/, /n/, /s/, /z/, and /l/.
SAMPLE,
princess /prɪnsɘs/ [pwɪnɘs] /ns/ [n]
drum
elephant
NOT FOR
Target Word Word Change
/drʌm/ [dwʌm]
/ɘləfənt/ [ɘʔə]
Sound Change
/dr/ [dw]
/nt/ [Ø]
frog
ADMINISTRATION
princess
/frɔg/ [gwɔg]
/prɪnsɘs/ [pwɪntɘs]
/fr/ [gw]
/ns/ [nt]
DFC
OR RESALE
Deletion of final consonant
The individual deletes the final consonant of a word (i.e., the production has no final consonant sound).
The examples below are not considered to be examples of DFC because the simplified productions still contain a final
consonant. Note that if the final consonant of a word is part of a consonant cluster, all consonants of the cluster must be
deleted to qualify as a deletion. If one or more consonants of the word-final cluster remain, CS applies.
Voicing
FDV Final devoicing
The individual deletes the voicing in word-final voiced consonants /b/, /d/, /g/, /m/, /n/, /ŋ/, /v/, /ð/, /z/, /ʒ/, /ʤ/, /l/, and /r/,
producing them as voiceless consonants /p/, /t/, /k/, /f/, /ɵ/, /s/, /ʃ/, and /ʧ/ or a glottal stop.
IV
NOT FOR
Initial voicing
The individual adds voicing to initial consonants /p/, /t/, /k/, /f/, /ɵ/, /s/, /ʃ/, /ʧ/, and /h/, resulting in one of the following
voiced consonants /b/, /d/, /g/, /m/, /n/, /ŋ/, /v/, /ð/, /z/, /ʒ/, /ʤ/, /l/, /r/, /w/, and /j/.
ADMINISTRATION
Examples of initial voicing (IV)
Manner
AFF Affrication
The individual adds a stop feature to the continuant feature of fricatives /f/, /v/, /ɵ/, /ð/, /s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/, and /h/, resulting in
an affricate.
Gliding of nasals occurs when the individual changes nasals /m/, /n/, and /ŋ/ to glides /w/ and /j/. This sound change does
NOT FOR
not apply in final position because glides cannot occur in word-final position..
ADMINISTRATION
monkey /mʌŋki/ [jʌŋki] /m/ [j]
finger /fɪŋgɚ/ [fɪjgɚ] /ŋ/ [j]
knife /naɪf/ [waɪf] /n/ [w]
OR RESALE
Gliding of stops occurs when the individual changes stop consonants /p/, /b/, /t/, /d/, /k/, and /g/ to glides /w/ and /j/. This
sound change does not apply in final position because glides cannot occur in word-final position.
GR Glottal replacement
The individual uses a glottal stop /ʔ/ to replace any consonant. Glottal stops are not regarded as deletions. Glottal stops
are most perceptible when used intervocalically, as when spider is produced as [spʔɚ].
SAMPLE,
watch /wɑʧ/ [pɑʧ] /w/ [p]
Stopping of liquids occurs when the individual changes liquids /l/ and /r/ to stop consonants /p/, /b/, /t/, /d/, /k/, and /g/ or a
glottal stop.
NOT FOR
Examples of stopping of liquids
ADMINISTRATION
ring /rɪŋ/ [pɪŋ] /r/ [p]
leaf /lif/ [dif] /l/ [d]
OR RESALE
Stopping of nasals occurs when the individual changes nasals /m/, /n/, and /ŋ/ to stop consonants /p/, /b/, /t/, /d/, /k/, and
/g/ or a glottal stop.
Place
BK Backing to velars or /h/
The individual alters the place of articulation of any nonvelar consonant to velars /k/, /g/, /ŋ/, and /h/.
If one or more consonants of the word-initial cluster remain, it is scored CS, not DIC. Similarly, if the production contains
an initial consonant, DIC does not apply. The following are not examples of DIC:
SAMPLE,
DMC Deletion of medial consonant
/gətɑr/ [tətɑr] /g/ [t] CVCVC CVCVC
NOT FOR
The individual deletes a consonant or consonant cluster occurring between two vowels. If the medial consonant of a
word is part of a consonant cluster, all consonants of the cluster must be deleted to be considered a deletion.
yellow
zebra
ADMINISTRATION
Target Word Word Change
/jɘlo/ [jɘo]
/zibrə/ [ziə]
Sound Change
/l/ [Ø]
/br/ [Ø]
Syllable Shape Change
CVCV CVV
CVCCV CVV
OR RESALE
vegetable /vɘʤtəbəl/ [vɘtəo] /b/ [Ø] CVCCVCVC CVCVV
If one or more consonants of the word-medial cluster remain, it is scored CS, not DMC. Similarly, if the production
contains a medial consonant, DMC does not apply. The following are not examples of DMC.
SAMPLE,
hammer /hæmɚ/ [hæpɚ] /m/ [p]
table /tebəl/ [tepəl] /b/ [p]
spider /spdɚ/ [sptɚ] /d/ [t]
MV
NOT FOR
Medial voicing
The individual adds voicing to medial voiceless consonants /p/, /t/, /k/, /f/, /ɵ/, /s/, /ʃ/, /ʧ/, and /h/ producing them as /b/, /d/,
/g/, /m/, /n/, /ŋ/, /v/, /ð/, /z/, /ʒ/, /ʤ/, /l/, /r/, /w/, and /j/.
ADMINISTRATION
Examples of medial voicing (MV)
OR RESALE
guitar /gətɑr/ [gədɑr] /t/ [d]
elephant /ɘləfənt/ [ɘləvənt] /f/ [v]
cookie /kʊki/ [kʊgi] /k/ [g]
COAL Coalescence
The individual combines part of the beginning of a word with part of the end of the word. The word is “collapsed” across
syllables. SR also applies.
Examples of coalescence
SAMPLE,
shovel /ʃʌvəl/ [ʃʌl] /və/ [Ø]
CH Consonant harmony
In consonant harmony, production of one consonant is affected by another consonant within the word. One consonant
NOT FOR
influences another so that both are produced at a similar place, in a similar manner, or with identical voicing. You
need to review the entire corpus of words and use your clinical judgment to determine if CH should be applied to the
sound change.
ADMINISTRATION
The following groups of phonemes by articulatory features are used for considering the application of CH:
MANNER
Stops: /p/, /b/, /t/, /d/, /k/, /g/, /ʔ/
OR RESALE
Nasals: /m/, /n/, /ŋ/
Fricatives: /f/, /v/, /ɵ/, /ð/, /s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /h/
Affricates: /ʧ/, /ʤ/
Liquids: /l/, /r/
Glides: /w/, /j/
PLACE
Alveolars: /t/, /d/, /n/, /s/, /z/, /l/
Interdentals: /ɵ/, /ð/
Labials: /p/, /b/, /m/, /f/, /v/, /w/
Palatals: /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /ʧ/, /ʤ/, /r/, /j/
Velars & Back: /k/, /g/, /ŋ/, /h/
VOICING
Voiceless: /p/, /t/, /k/, /f/, /ɵ/, /s/, /ʃ/, /ʧ/, /h/, /ʔ/
Voiced: /b/, /d/, /g/, /v/, /ð/, /z/, /ʒ/, /ʤ/, /m/, /n/, /ŋ/, /l/, /r/, /w/, /j/
DEN Denasalization
The individual changes nasal sounds to homorganic stops (place of articulation is similar to target sound).
FV Final voicing
SAMPLE,
The individual adds voicing to final consonants /p/, /t/, /k/, /f/, /ɵ/, /s/, /ʃ/, and /ʧ/, resulting in /b/, /d/, /g/, /m/, /n/, /ŋ/, /v/, /ð/,
/z/, /ʒ/, /ʤ/, /l/, and /r/.
NOT FOR
Target Word Word Change Sound Change
duck /dʌk/ [dʌg] /k/ [g]
knife /naɪf/ [naɪv] /f/ [v]
ADMINISTRATION
house /haʊs/ [aʊz] /s/ [z]
NDEN Interdentalization
OR RESALE
The individual changes nondental consonants to interdental consonants /ɵ/ and /ð/.
LAB Labialization
The individual produces a nonlabial consonant as a labial consonant /p/, /b/, /m/, /f/, /v/, and /w/.
Examples of metathesis
(+)NAS Nasalization
The individual produces nonnasal consonants as nasal consonants /m/, /n/, and /ŋ/.
SAMPLE,
PAL Palatalization
The individual produces nonpalatal consonants as palatal consonants /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /ʧ/, /ʤ/, /j/, and /r/.
NOT FOR
Examples of palatalization (PAL)
ADMINISTRATION
pajamas /pəʤɑməz/ [pəʤɑʤəz] /m/ [ʤ]
leaf /lif/ [liʃ] /f/ [ʃ]
OR RESALE
(+)STR Stridency addition
The individual replaces nonstrident consonants with strident consonants /f/, /v/, /s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /ʧ/, and /ʤ/.
Dentalized productions
The individual distorts consonants (particularly alveolar fricatives) by altering the place of articulation dentally. Dentalized
productions include [s] and [z].
͆ ͆
Lateralized productions
The individual distorts consonants (particularly alveolar fricatives) by altering the place of articulation laterally. Lateralized
productions include [s] and [z].
ᵔ ᵔ
Vowel nasalization
The individual produces a nasal vowel that is not adjacent to a nasal consonant. Vowels that are adjacent to nasal
consonants normally contain nasality. For example, in the word man, the /æ/ is produced with nasality, whereas the /æ/ in
tap is produced with no perceived nasality.
Another type of vowel nasalization is the addition of nasality to vowels that are not adjacent to nasal consonants, as in
~ ]. In these words, nasality is added where it does not usually appear—in the context of nonnasal consonants.
/tæp/ [tæ
Idiosyncratic processes
Any sound change not commonly found in descriptions of normal or disordered phonology should be examined for a
rule-driven pattern.
Interacting processes
Sound changes can result from the application of a single phonological process or from the application of two or
more phonological processes. When more than one phonological process contributes to a single sound change, the
phonological processes are referred to as interacting processes.
SAMPLE,
Interfering processes
The application of some phonological processes may temporarily block or interfere with the application of other
phonological processes. When this occurs, the phonological process that blocks is referred to as the interfering process.
NOT FOR
When a syllable is deleted, it may interfere with the application of other phonological processes. For example, when
guitar /gətɑr/ becomes [gət], the absent word-final consonant, /r/, is not an example of DFC but of SR of word-final
/ɑr/. When deletion and reduction processes are suppressed and no longer acting as interfering processes, the blocked
ADMINISTRATION
phonological processes may emerge.
OR RESALE
frog /frɔg/ [frɔ] DFC VF, FDV
Reduplication
Reduplication occurs when the individual attempts to produce a multisyllabic word by repeating one of its consonant-
vowel (CV) syllables, usually the stressed syllable. While the target word may have two or more dissimilar syllables, the
individual’s production will contain two identical or very similar syllables. The consonant must be repeated; the vowel may
be repeated or altered. Additionally, both the consonant and the vowel may be the target sounds or the result of sound
changes. Multiple processes contribute to reduplication, so it is not scored separately on the KLPA–3.
Sound preference
The individual tends to use one sound or type of sound significantly more often than others. A pattern would be present
from the individual’s Phonetic Inventory for Consonants in Single Words in the Analysis Form. Sound preferences are very
individual and should be included in any summary of an individual’s phonology. For example, if the individual replaces all
consonants that are not word-final with a preferred phoneme like [s], the following pattern would be evident:
SAMPLE,
pig /pɪg/ [sɪg] /p/ [s]
lion /laɪən/ [saɪən] /l/ [s]
NOT FOR
Vowel alteration
The individual alters a target vowel so that it becomes a different vowel.
ADMINISTRATION
Examples of vowel alteration
OR RESALE
shoe /ʃu/ [ʃæ] /u/ [æ]
Note. When a syllable in final position consisting of /ɚ/ or /əl/ becomes a different vowel, the phonological process of
Vocalization (VOC) is applied.
Examples
While vowel alteration is a broad category, specific vowel phonological processes have been described in the literature
(Bauman-Waengler, 2011; Bernthal, Bankson, & Flipsen, 2013; Donegan, 2013; McGowan, McGowan, Denny, & Nittrouer,
2014). Because the vocal tract is open during vowel production, and no airflow obstruction occurs as in consonant
production, the choice of vowel phonological process can be somewhat subjective, relying on comparisons between the
target vowels and the individual’s productions.
Drawing on the current literature regarding vowel alterations, eight vowel phonological processes are included in the
KLPA–3. The vowel phonological process definitions are listed here and on the back of the Analysis Form. These
phonological processes should be used in conjunction with the KLPA–3 Vowel Analysis located on the back of the
Analysis Form for a more in-depth vowel analysis.
Fronting
The individual produces a back vowel as a front vowel
Centralization
The individual produces a front or back vowel as a central vowel.
SAMPLE,
Examples of vowel alteration: centralization
NOT FOR
cookie /kʊki/ [kukə] /i/ [ə]
Decentralization
The individual produces a central vowel as either a front or back vowel.
cup
ADMINISTRATION
Examples of vowel alteration: decentralization
The individual alters the vowel production by raising the vowel height.
/ə/ [i]
Lowering
The individual alters the vowel production by lowering the vowel height.
Monophthongization
The individual produces a diphthong //, //, or // as a monophthong.
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
General Guidelines
When to Complete a Phonological Analysis
The greater the degree of unintelligibility in an individual’s speech production, the more appropriate the decision to
complete a phonological analysis. The following guidelines have been established for determining when a phonological
analysis should be completed (Khan & Bird, 1983; Khan & Lewis, 2002).
1. When the individual’s speech is reasonably intelligible and has only a few misarticulated phonemes, a
standardized articulation test, such as the GFTA–3, is an appropriate choice. Completion of a phonological
SAMPLE,
process analysis is not needed.
2. When an individual’s speech is reasonably intelligible but contains many misarticulated phonemes, a standardized
articulation test and a phonological process analysis should be completed.
NOT FOR
3. When an individual is very young or has moderately to severely unintelligible speech (i.e., multiple speech sound
errors resulting in unintelligibility), a standardized articulation test and a phonological process analysis should
be completed.
Because the KLPA–3 is a companion tool to the GFTA–3, the KLPA–3 and GFTA–3 work in tandem to provide a
ADMINISTRATION
comprehensive profile of an individual’s speech production. Through the administration of the GFTA–3, the individual’s
responses are elicited to the 60 target words in the Sounds-in-Words test. The KLPA-3 provides for a phonological
process analysis of any sound changes in the individual’s responses.
OR RESALE
The GFTA–3 provides two ways of recording speech sound productions: by presence of sound change (i.e., marking
through a phoneme that was misarticulated) and type of sound change (i.e., marking the phoneme that was
misarticulated and noting the misproduction by using phonetic transcription). For the KLPA–3, a complete phonetic
transcription of each sound change is required. For example, a complete phonetic transcription of an individual’s
response to the target word duck might be [tʌk] or [dʌd]. Space for these transcriptions is provided on both the GFTA–3
Record Form and the KLPA–3 Analysis Form. Tables containing the IPA symbols for the consonants and vowels
represented in Standard American English and common diacritical marks are located in Appendix E.
SAMPLE,
abbreviations. The abbreviations for Core Phonological Processes are in bold font; abbreviations for supplemental or
other phonological processes are presented in regular font. Additionally each consonant phoneme row is color coded by
its word position, matching color usage in the GFTA–3: purple for initial, green for medial, and blue for final.
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
0158012879_KLPA3_MAN.indb 25
(+)STR (+)STR (+)STR (+)STR PAL AFF AFF
8 duck ʌ DIC
CS
IDV
ST(Oth)
IDV
ST(Oth)
IDV
BK
IDV
(+)NAS
(+)NAS
BK
IDV
FRC IDV
FRC
IDV
FRC IDV
FRC ST(Oth)
ST(Oth)
LIQ
LIQ
\ PAL
IDV
DFC ST(Oth)
LAB FV ST(Oth)
VF ALV
VF BK
\ ST(Oth)
FV GR
GR FV ALV
VF (+)NAS
FV FRC
FRC (+)STR
FV FRC
FRC NDEN
FV FRC
VF (+)STR
VF FRC
FRC (+)STR
FV IDV
(+)STR (+)STR
FV ALV
VF PAL
FV BK
w LAB ALV FV ST(Oth) ST(Oth) LAB FV (+)STR
(+)NAS LAB FRC NDEN
NDEN FRC (+)STR
FRC ALV
FV (+)STR
(+)STR PAL
FRC (+)STR
PAL PAL
(+)STR FV LIQ FRC
9 quack k ALV PAL PAL AFF
(+)NAS (+)NAS (+)STR LAB NDEN (+)STR FRC PAL (+)STR AFF PAL LIQ PAL
(+)STR (+)STR PAL AFF AFF
æ
CS
LAB
IV
VF
VF \
IV
GR IV VF
IV
FRC
IV
FRC
IV
VF VF
FRC
IV
(+)STR
IV VF
IV
IV
IV
FRC
DFC LAB FV
LAB VF VF
IV \ FV GR FV
LAB VF
IV FV
(+)NAS FRC
LAB FV
FRC FRC
NDEN FV
FRC VF
FRC VF
IV FRC
(+)STR FV
FRC (+)STR
PAL FV
(+)STR VF
IV FV
LIQ
GL(Oth)
GL(Oth)
k LAB FV LAB FV (+)NAS LAB FRC NDEN FRC FRC FV (+)STR FRC PAL (+)STR FV LIQ
k (+)NAS (+)NAS (+)STR LAB NDEN (+)STR FRC PAL (+)STR AFF PAL LIQ PAL LAB PAL
(+)NAS (+)NAS LAB
(+)STR (+)STR NDEN FRC
(+)STR (+)STR PAL (+)STR
PAL AFF PAL
AFF LIQ PAL
DIC CS IDV ST(Oth) IDV ST(Oth) IDV BK IDV (+)NAS (+)NAS BK IDV (+)STR
FRC IDV FRC IDV (+)STR
FRC IDV PAL AFF
FRC ST(Oth) ST(Oth) LIQ LIQ \ PAL IDV
DIC LAB
ST(Oth) IV \
ST(Oth) IV
ALV BK IV
ST(Oth) GR IV IV
ALV IV
(+)NAS FRC IV
(+)STR FRC IV
NDEN FRC IV
(+)STR FRC IV
(+)STR PAL
IDV IV
(+)STR IV
ALV IV
PAL IV IV BK
w LAB ALV ST(Oth) BK ST(Oth) LAB (+)NAS BK LAB
(+)STR FRC NDEN FRC (+)STR FRC
ALV PAL
(+)STR FRC
PAL (+)STR PAL LIQ LIQ GL(Oth) GL(Oth) FRC
9 quack t
(+)NAS (+)NAS (+)STR LAB NDEN ALV (+)STR (+)STR
PAL PAL AFF
PAL (+)STR
AFF PAL LAB PAL
(+)STR (+)STR AFF AFF
SR
e
æ
DMC
DFC MDV
LAB \
FV MDV
VF ALV
VF BK
\ BK
FV GR (+)NAS
FV (+)NAS
VF BK
FV FRC FRC
FV FRC FRC
FV FRC
VF FRC
VF FRC FRC
FV MDV (+)STR
(+)STR FV LIQ
VF LIQ
FV GL(Oth)
GL(Oth)
BK
te LAB ALV FV MDV MDV LAB ALV
FV (+)NAS MDV
LAB (+)STR
FRC MDV
NDEN NDEN
FRC MDV
FRC (+)STR
FV MDV (+)STR
(+)STR FRC (+)STR
PAL AFF
(+)STR ALV
FV PAL
LIQ PAL FRC
10 table bk
teb (+)NAS (+)NAS (+)STR LAB NDEN NDEN (+)STR ALV
FRC (+)STR
PAL PAL
(+)STR AFF PAL LIQ PAL MDV
bəl (+)STR ALV (+)STR PAL PAL PAL AFF
ə
DIC
LAB
IV \
IV
BK
IV
GR IV
IV
IV
FRC
IV
FRC
IV
FRC
IV
FRC
IV
PAL
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
BK
əl
LAB
FDV ST(Oth) FDV ST(Oth) FDV BK FDV (+)NAS
LAB (+)NAS BK LAB
FDV FRC NDEN
FDV FRC (+)STR
FDV FRC PAL
FDV FRC (+)STR
FDV PAL LIQ
\ LIQ
PAL GL(Oth)
GL(Oth)
FRC
VOC
t
ST(Oth) LAB ST(Oth) BK ST(Oth) GR (+)NAS
LAB (+)NAS (+)STR
FRC LAB
(+)STR FRC NDEN FRC (+)STR (+)STR
FRC PAL AFF
PAL (+)STR PAL LAB PAL
l
LAB ST(Oth) ST(Oth) (+)STR (+)STR
LAB NDEN (+)STR PAL (+)STR (+)STR AFF
SR LAB (+)STR AFF
e
DIC
DMC DEN
MDV DEN
\ IDV
MDV ST(Oth)
ALV BK BK IDV
GR \ ALV
(+)NAS (+)NAS BK IDV
FRC FRC IDV
FRC FRC IDV
FRC FRC IDV
FRC FRC IDV
MDV (+)STR LIQ LIQ GL(Oth) GL(Oth) BK
te IDV ST(Oth)
ALV ALV MDV
IDV ST(Oth) MDV GR FRC
ALV (+)NAS MDV (+)STR FRC
MDV NDEN FRC
MDV (+)STR FRC
MDV (+)STR (+)STR PAL
AFF ALV PAL PAL IDV
FRC
10 table m
b
teb ALV ST(Oth) ST(Oth) (+)STR NDEN (+)STR ALV (+)STR PAL PAL
AFF AFF
PAL FRC
MDV
SR ALV PAL AFF
PAL
bəl
ɚ
0158012887_KLPA3_SC.indd 4
hæ
mɚ
ɚ
MDV ST(Oth) ALV
ALV
BK
ST(Oth)
ST(Oth)
FDV
FRC
NDEN
NDEN
FRC
NDEN
MDV (+)STR
(+)STR
ALV
FDV
FRC
(+)STR
ALV
FRC
(+)STR
ALV
MDV (+)STR (+)STR
(+)STR
PAL
FDV
FRC
(+)STR
PAL
FRC
PAL
AFF
PAL
AFF
FDV (+)STR
(+)STR (+)STR
AFF
AFF
ALV
ALV
PAL
\
PAL
FRC
MDV
VOC
8/6/15 12:26 PM
LAB ALV
25
ADMINISTRATION
8/31/15 3:38 PM
Review the KLPA–3 Analysis Form. It provides a place for recording all sound changes that occur when an individual’s
production of a stimulus word differs from the target word. Space is provided to transcribe the individual’s responses,
mark sound changes, and record associated phonological processes for each consonant or consonant cluster sound
change. In addition, space is provided to record vowel alterations by word. Left-hand pages (in purple) are used to
record Core Phonological Processes, and the right-hand pages (in green) are used to record Supplemental Phonological
Processes, vowel alterations, other phonological processes, and the number of processes per word (PPW). Cells for
phonological processes that are not applicable to the sound are shaded.
SAMPLE,
ancy Lewis
Age Calculation
NOT FOR
____________________________________ u Female u Male
chool/Agency: _________________________________________
Test Date 2016 5 16
5 4 34
4
e: _________________________________________________
__ Birth Date 2009 11 9
ADMINISTRATION
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________ Age 6 5 25
____________________________________________________ Reminder: Do not round up to next month or year.
OR RESALE
Figure 3.2 Calculating Chronological Age
Begin the KLPA–3–analysis by reviewing an individual’s responses to the GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Words test. Transcribe
the individual’s response in the Individual’s Response column on the KLPA–3 Analysis Form. In the Sound Change
column, record any substitutions (e.g., t/s, w/r), omissions (e.g., -/d, -/m), or distortions (e.g., ph/p) for the corresponding
rences of scored phonological processes.
target sound.
Occurrence for Core Phonological Processes Vowel Alterations
Next, identify the applicable phonological processes evident in each sound change for each target word. To identify the
Number of Total
phonological Possible related
processes Percent
to of Notes: change, use the Sound Change Booklet by following these steps:
a specific sound
Occurrences Occurrences Occurrences
1. Referof to8 the
= column labeled%Target Sound to locate the sound in the stimulus word that the individual
produced incorrectly.
of 20 = %
2. Read across the table to the appropriate column that represents the individual’s sound change.
nd affricates (ST) 3. Theofcell48where
= the Target Sound
% Dialectal
and the individual’s Influence
sound change intersect lists the applicable
phonological process(es).
R) of 42 = % Yes No
After you identify the phonological process(es) in the Sound Change Booklet, record them in the Analysis Form. To do
of cell
15 that
= intersects the Notes:
% row of the
this, locate the target sound with the column of the phonological process. Place an X
in the cell. For some sound changes, more than one phonological process is indicated. Repeat the steps listed above to
of 12 = %
record all applicable phonological processes in the Analysis Form for all sound changes.
of 23 = %
26 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Chapter 3 ■ Recording and Scoring Directions
of
0158012879_KLPA3_MAN.indb 26 25 = % Notes: 8/31/15 3:38 PM
Note. You can also use Q-global scoring to quickly and accurately assign applicable phonological processes by entering
all the individual’s sound changes for the GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Words items.
Scoring Considerations
Scoring interfering processes, such as syllable reduction (SR) and cluster simplification (CS), require special considerations.
■■ In the Sound Change Booklet, the columns Syllable Del and Cluster Del identify phonological processes that
involve combinations of sounds (i.e., syllables, consonant clusters). Examine the combination of sounds as one
entity to determine if a phonological process applies.
■■ The phonological process of SR Is identified as an interfering process that may temporarily block or interfere
with the application of other phonological processes. If you code a sound change as SR, do not record the
blocked processes.
Scoring vocalization (VOC) also requires special consideration. All the syllabic liquids in the KLPA–3 target words are word-
final. For scoring consistency of VOC, the vowel is recorded as deleted and the word-final syllabic liquid becomes a vowel.
These process do not coincide with and should not be confused with the deletion of consonant and consonant cluster
sounds in specific word positions (i.e., DIC, DMC, DFC).
SAMPLE,
each applicable phonological process column.
Target Word: quack
/kwæk/ [kæk]: The sound /w/ is deleted from the initial sound combination /kw/. Because one sound still
NOT FOR
remains from the sound combination, the phonological process is CS. On the Analysis Form (see Figure 3.3),
locate the Cluster simplification column. Place an X in the cell that intersects with the /w/.
Do not also mark DIC (deletion of initial consonant) for the sound combination /kw/.
ADMINISTRATION
Target Word: table
[te]: The sound combination /bəl/ is deleted. The phonological process is SR. On the Analysis Form
/tebəl/
(see Figure 3.3), locate the Syllable reduction column. Place an X In the cell that intersects with /t/, /b/, and /əl/.
OR RESALE
Do not also mark DMC (deletion of medial consonant) for /b/.
Target Word: monkey
[ki]: The sound combination /mʌŋ/ is deleted. The phonological process is SR. On the Analysis Form
/mʌŋki/
(see Figure 3.3), locate the Syllable reduction column. Place an X in the cell that intersects with the /m/, /ŋ/,
and /k/.
Do not also mark DIC (deletion of initial consonant) for /m/ or DMC (deletion of medial consonant) for /ŋ/.
Target Word: hammer
/hæmɚ/ [hæm]: The sound /ɚ/ is deleted. The phonological process is SR. On the Analysis Form (see
Figure 3.3), locate the Syllable reduction column. Place an X in the cell that intersects /h/, /m/, and /ɚ/.
and
Stri
Del
Clu
Init
Sto
Pal
Vel
Syl
Fin
De
ITEM
Gli
Word Transcription Response Sound Change
Vo
co
h
1 house hs
s
d
2 door dɔr
r
p
3 pig pɪg
g
k
4 cup kʌp
p
Manner Place Reduction Voicing
5 CORE
boy b b
Cluster simplification
Stopping of fricatives
Phonological Processes p
Stridency deletion
Syllable reduction
Gliding of liquids
6 apple æpəl
Deletion of final
Palatal fronting
Final devoicing
əl
Velar fronting
Initial voicing
and affricates
Deaffrication
Vocalization
consonant
7 go go g
Target IPA Individual’s Target
d Sound
ITEM
8 Word
duck Transcription
dʌk Response Sound Change
k
h
kæk
1 house hs k
s
9 quack kwæk w
d —
2 door dɔr k
r
te
t
p
103 pig
table pɪg
tebəl b
g —
əl —
—
k
ki
4 cup kʌp m
—
p
11 monkey mʌŋki ŋ
5 boy b b
k
hæm
h
p
6 apple æpəl
12 hammer hæmɚ m
əl
7 go go ɚ
g —
f
13 fish fɪʃ d
8 duck dʌk Examples of CS and SR ʃ
Figure 3.3 KLPA–3 k Scored Responses
w
14 watch wɑʧ k
Target Word: quack ʧ
SAMPLE,
9 quack kwæk w
/kwæk/ [æk]: The sound combination s /kw/ is deleted. The phonological process is DIC. On the Analysis Form (see
k
p
Manner Place MannerReduction VoicingReduction
15CORE Figure
spider 3.4),
spdɚ locate the Deletion of initial
t consonant column. Place Place
an X in theVoicing
cell that intersects with the /k/ and /w/.
d SUPPLEMENTAL
Cluster simplification
Stopping of fricatives
Phonological Processes
Other phonological
Stridency deletion
Syllable reduction
10 table tebəl b
medial consonant
Gliding of liquids
to velars
Vowel alterations
Medial devoicing
Phonological Processes
initial consonant
Deletion of final
Do not also mark CS (Consonant simplification) for the /k/ and /w/, individually.
Stopping (other)
Palatal fronting
Initial devoicing
Final devoicing
Medial voicing
Velar fronting
Gliding (other)
Initial voicing
and affricates
Deaffrication
Liquidization
Vocalization
əl
consonant
of
Deletion of
Affrication
processes
w
NOT FOR
Frication
Deletion
Backing
16 Target web
Word Target
wɘb
Transcription Word: monkey m
(PPW)
IPA Individual’s Target Sound
or /h/
Target Target
ITEM Response Sound Change b Sound Word ITEM
11 monkey mʌŋki h ŋ
1 house /mʌŋki/
hs [mʌi]: Thes sound combination d /ŋk/ is deleted. The phonological process is DMC. On the Analysis h
houseForm 1
k s
217 doordrum(see dɔr Figure drʌm3.4), locate d
r
the Deletionh
r of medial consonant column. Place an X in the cell that intersects d /ŋ/ and /k/.
door 2
r
p m
312 hammer
pig Dopɪgnot hæmɚ also mark CS m
g for the /ŋ / and /k/, individually.
p
pig 3
ADMINISTRATION
p g
k ɚ k
4
18 cup plate kʌp plet l Manner Place Reduction Voicing cup 4
p p
f SUPPLEMENTAL
513 boy fish b fɪʃ t
b boy 5
Other phonological
ʃ
medial consonant
Backing to velars
Vowel alterations
Medial devoicing
Phonological Processes
initial consonant
Stopping (other)
Initial devoicing
p
Medial voicing
p
n
Gliding (other)
6 apple æpəl
Liquidization
apple 6
19 knife nf əl w
Deletion of
Deletion of
əl
Affrication
processes
14 go watchgo wɑʧ
Frication
g ʧf g go
(PPW)
7 7
or /h/
OR RESALE
Target Target
Sound Word ITEM
820 duckshoedʌk ʃu d ʃ
s
d
h duck 8
k k house 1
k ps — k
s
21
915 spider
quack
slide
kwæk
æk
spdɚ
sld
w
k dl — w
k
d
r
quack
door 9
2
p
t ɚ
d t
g
pig 3
10 table tebəl b b table 10
əlw k
əl cup 4
16 web wɘb Subtotal 1 p
m b m
—
11 monkey mʌŋki
mʌi —
ŋ
k d
ŋb
kp
boy
monkey 5
11
apple 6
h h
17
12 hammer
drumhæmɚ
drʌm m
r əl
mg hammer
go 12
7
2 KLPA–3 j Analysis Form ɚ m ɚ
d
f f duck 8
13 fish fɪʃ
ʃ
p ʃ
k fish 13
Figure 3.4 wɑʧKLPA–3
k
18 watchplate
14
plet Examples of DIC and lDMC Scored Responses
w w
w watch
quack 14
9
ʧ ʧ
s
t s
k
Target
0158012844_KLPA3_AF.indd 2 Word: table p n p 8/11/15 12:27 PM
t
spider
19 spiderknife
15 spdɚ nf d
b table 15
10
/tebəl/ [tebo]: Theɚd sound combination
f /əl/ is changed. Assume that the vowel is deleted and the consonant
əl
ɚ
m
20
16 web shoewɘb/l/ is changed
ʃu to vowel
w
b
/o/. The phonological
ʃ process is VOC. On the Analysis Form (see Figure 3.5), wbŋlocate
webthe 16
monkey 11
k
Vocalization column.d Place an X in the cell that intersects /əl/.
s d
h
17 drum drʌm r r drum 17
m hammer 12
21 slide sld m l m
Target Word: monkey ɚ
p
p d f
l plate
18 plate
/mʌŋki/
plet
[mʌki]:
The
l
t
single consonant /ŋ/ is deleted from the sound combination /ŋk/. Because oneʃsound still
t
fish 18
13
w
19 knife remains
nf from the sound
n Subtotal
combination, the1 phonological process is CS. On the Analysis Form (see Figure n
ʧ 3.5),
watch
knife
14
19
f f
s
20 shoe locate
ʃu the Cluster simplification
ʃ column. Place an X in the cell that intersects /ŋ/. ʃ
p shoe 20
spider 15
s sd
21
2
slide Do not also mark DMC
sld
KLPA–3 j Analysis Form l for the sound combination /ŋk/. ɚl slide 21
d d
w
web 16
b
Target Word: hammer Subtotal 1 Subtotal 1
d
/hæmɚ/ [hæmo]: The sound /ɚ/ is changed to vowel /o/. The phonological process is VOC. On the Analysis Form
m
r drum 17
Subtotal 1
Clu
Init
Sto
Pal
Vel
Syl
Fin
Str
De
De
ITEM
Gli
Word Transcription Response Sound Change
Vo
co
an
h
1 house hs
s
d
2 door dɔr
r
p
3 pig pɪg
g
k
4 cup kʌp
p
Manner Place Reduction Voicing
5 CORE
boy b b
Cluster simplification
Stopping of fricatives
Phonological Processes p
Stridency deletion
Syllable reduction
Gliding of liquids
6 apple æpəl
Deletion of final
Palatal fronting
Final devoicing
əl
Velar fronting
Initial voicing
and affricates
Deaffrication
Vocalization
consonant
7 go go g
Target IPA Individual’s Target
d Sound
8
ITEM duck
Word dʌk
Transcription Response Sound Change
k
h
1 house hs k
s
9 quack kwæk w
d
2 door dɔr k
r
tebo
t
p
10
3 table
pig tebəl
pɪg b
g
əl
k
o
mʌki
4 cup kʌp m
11 monkey mʌŋki
p
ŋ —
5 boy b b
k
hæmo
h
p
6
12 apple
hammer æpəl
hæmɚ m
o
əl
ɚ
7 go go g
f
13 fish fɪʃ d
8 duck dʌk ʃ
Figure 3.5 KLPA–3 Examples of VOC andwk CS Scored Responses
14 watch wɑʧ k
ʧ
SAMPLE,
Identifying
9 quack Vowel
kwæk Alterations w
s
k
p
The15 KLPA–3
spider provides
spdɚ a column in the Analysis
dt
Form to note deviations from the target word in vowel production.
Recording and analyzing
10 table tebəl vowel alterations ɚ
provides
b valuable information contributing to the qualitative aspect of the
diagnostic process. əl
w
NOT FOR
16 web wɘb m
b
To11complete
monkey the mʌŋki
Vowel alterations column, ŋnote any changes to vowels of each target word. For example, when the /ɪ/ in
d
/pig/
17
is drum
changed to drʌm/i/, note this change withkr i/ɪ and consider this one change.
h
m
12 hammer hæmɚ m
Identifying Other Phonological Processes
ADMINISTRATION
p
ɚ
18 plate plet l
A group of other processes is discussed in fChapter 2 of this Manual. These phonological processes occur infrequently
13 fish fɪʃ t
from only a few individuals in the normativeʃnsample. However, it is important to include these other phonological
19
processes knife nf w
14 watchbecause wɑʧthey may provide informationf contributing to an individual’s speech sound profile.
ʧ
OR RESALE
20 shoe ʃu
A column labeled Other phonological processes ʃ is provided in the Analysis Form. For each sound change, list any of the
s
other
15
phonological
spider spdɚ
processes that may apply
s in this column.
p
21 slide sld dl
d
Determining Processes per Word ɚ
w
16 web wɘb Subtotal 1
The KLPA–3 provides a column in the Analysis b Form to compute the average number of processes per word (PPW) that
an individual uses. The PPW is a measure of d severity, represented by a ratio calculated by dividing the total number of
17 drum processes
phonological drʌm used by the number r of words produced. The more phonological processes that are presented
2 KLPA–3 j Analysis Form m
(i.e., the greater the PPW value), the more severe a phonological disorder is considered to be. For example an individual
p
may18
produce
plate
the plet
target word house /hs/ las [haʊ], which results from the application of two phonological processes
(i.e. deletion of final consonant, stridency deletion).
t In comparison, the individual may produce /haʊs/ as [haʊg], which
0158012844_KLPA3_AF.indd 2
results from the application of four phonological n processes (i.e., stopping of fricatives and affricates, stridency8/11/15 12:27 PM
deletion,
19 knife nf
backing to velars or /h/, final voicing). f
20 shoe ʃu ʃ
To calculate the PPW, count the total number of phonological processes across the row for each target sound. Then sum
s
the values in the rows that represent the entire target word. Record the sum in the column labeled Processes per word
21 slide sld l
(PPW) in the Analysis Form. d
Space is provided at the bottom of each page of the Core Phonological Processes to subtotal each phonological process
usage.
2 Transfer
KLPA–3 the subtotals
j Analysis Form for each of the phonological processes to the last page of item analysis in the Analysis
Form, and then sum the subtotals to calculate the raw score for each Core Phonological Process. To calculate the total
raw score, add the raw scores from each of the Core Phonological Processes in the Sums of Subtotals box and put the
total in the Total Raw Score box. See Figure 3.6.
0158012844_KLPA3_AF.indd 2 8/11/15 12:27 PM
Cluster simplification
Subtotal 1
Stopping of fricatives
37 zebra zibrə b
s
Stridency deletion
Syllable reduction
Phonological Processes
Gliding of liquids
Deletion of final
Palatal fronting
sr
Final devoicing
Velar fronting
Initial voicing
and affricates
Deaffrication
Vocalization
ʤk
consonant
238 KLPA–3 j Analysis Form
53 giraffe
crown ʤəræf
krn r
Target IPA Individual’s Target Sound
ITEM Word Transcription Response nf
Sound Change
56 juice ʤus
ʤ t
Subtotal 2 1 1 1 4 3
54 truck trʌk sr
0158012844_KLPA3_AF.indd 2 8/11/15 12:27 PM
57 zoo zu kz
455 KLPA–3
red
j Analysis Form
rɘd sr
58 star stɑr dt
r
Subtotal 3 2 1 1 1
f
59 five
0158012844_KLPA3_AF.indd 4
fv 8/11/15 12:27 PM
v
6 KLPA–3 j Analysis Form s
60 seven sɘvən v
n
1 1 1
SAMPLE,
0158012844_KLPA3_AF.indd 6 Subtotal 4 8/11/15 12:27 PM
Subtotal 1 3 1
1 1 1 4 3
NOT FOR
Subtotal 2
Subtotal 3 2 1 1 1
+ Subtotal 4 1 1 1
22
OR RESALE
TOTAL RAW SCORE
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 6:4–6:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 73 69–79 68–80 4 82 78–88 77–89 12 16
17 72 68–78 67–79 3 81 77–87 76–88 10 17
18 71 67–77 67–78 3 80 76–86 75–87 9 18
19 70 66–76 66–77 2 79 75–85 74–86 8 19
20 70 66–76 66–77 2 78 74–84 73–85 7 20
NOT FOR
21 69 66–75 65–76 2 77 73–83 72–84 6 21
22 68 65–74 64–75 2 76 72–82 71–83 5 22
23 68 65–74 64–75 2 75 71–81 70–82 5 23
24 67 64–73 63–74 1 74 70–81 69–82 4 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 66 63–72 62–73 1 73 69–80 68–81 4 25
26 66 63–72 62–73 1 72 68–79 67–80 3 26
Figure273.7 Locating
65 62–71 Standard
the KLPA–3 61–72Score 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 27
28 64 61–70 60–71 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 28
Step29 2. Determine 63 Confidence60–69 59–70
Intervals 1 69 65–76 64–77 2 29
OR RESALE
30 63 60–69 59–70 1 69 65–76 64–77 2 30
Follow31these instructions
62 to 59–68
report a confidence
58–69 interval.
1 68 64–75 63–76 2 31
32 62 59–68 58–69 1 67 63–74 62–75 1 32
1. Select the level of confidence that is appropriate for the purpose of the assessment or is required by your agency
33 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 66 62–73 61–74 1 33
or district. Confidence intervals are listed at the 90% and 95% levels. On the Analysis Form, indicate the level at
34 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 65 62–72 61–73 1 34
35
which you 59
are reporting.
56–65 55–66 0.3 64 61–71 60–72 1 35
36 Using the58same table
2. 55–64
from Step54–65 0.3 read across
1 (see Figure 3.7), 63 the individual’s
60–70 raw59–71 1
score and standard 36
score
37 to the column
57 54–63
for the 90% or 95% 53–64
confidence0.2 interval. Be 62
sure that you59–69
are in the58–70
correct column 37of
1 for the sex
38 the individual.
56 53–62 52–63 0.2 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 38
39 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 39
3.
40 Enter the53 two numbers 50–60that represent
49–61 the lower 0.1and upper57 54–64 in the Confidence
limits of scores 53–65 Interval
0.2 box in40 the
41 Score Summary
52 on 49–59
the Analysis48–60
Form (see figure
0.1 3.8). 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 41
42 51 48–58 47–59 0.1 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 42
Step43 3. Determine 49 Percentile46–56 Ranks 45–57 <0.1 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 43
44 47 44–54 43–55 <0.1 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 44
To report percentile rank, convert the standard score to a percentile rank by using the same table in Appendix A that
45 45 42–52 42–53 <0.1 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 45
was used to derive the standard score and its confidence interval (see Figure 3.7). Locate the standard score in the
46 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 49 46–57 45–58 <0.1 46
appropriate
47
column42
and read40–49
across to the right to the<0.1
39–50
Percentile Rank
47
column. Record the
44–55
percentile <0.1
43–56
rank for the score
47
in the48
appropriate40 box in the38–47
Score Summary37–48 on the Analysis
<0.1 Form46(see Figure 3.8).
43–54 42–55 <0.1 48
49 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 45 43–53 42–54 <0.1 49
Step50 4. Determine 40 Age Equivalents
38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–52 41–53 <0.1 50
51
Age equivalents 40the KLPA–3
for 38–47 37–48in Appendix
are reported <0.1 B. To determine
42 the40–50 39–51corresponding
age equivalent <0.1 to the51
total
52
raw score, find the40total raw 38–47
score in the37–48 <0.1 and read
left-hand column 41across to39–49
the right to38–50 52 the
<0.1column for
the appropriate
53–160 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 53–160
individual’s sex. Record the age equivalent in the appropriate box in the Score Summary on the Analysis Form. Figure 3.8
shows a completed Score Summary from the front of the Analysis Form for an individual age 6:5.
22 68 65 – 74 2 3:4 – 3:5
* Raw score equals total number of occurrences of scored phonological processes.
Figure 3.8 Completed KLPA–3 Score
A N ASummary
L Y S I S F O R M
Other phonological
medial consonant
Backing to velars
Vowel alterations
Medial devoicing
Phonological Processes
initial consonant
get the percent of occurrences.
Stopping (other)
Initial devoicing
___________________________________________________________________________ _
Medial voicing
Gliding (other)
Reminder: Do not round up to next month or year.
Liquidization
Deletion of
Deletion of
Stridency deletion (STR) of 42 = %
Affrication
processes
For example, if the sum of subtotal on the last page of item analysis for SR was 4, then 4 should beYes No
Frication
recorded in the
(PPW)
or /h/
KLPA–3 Score Summary Target Target
Sound Word ITEM
Confidence Interval
Number Raw of ScoreOccurrences
*Total Vocalization (VOC) Standard Scorecolumn for 90% Syllable95% reduction
Percentile Rank (SR).
of 15 To
= calculate
Age Equivalent the%percent of occurrences, the number juice
Notes: ʤ of 56
s
occurrences (4) is divided by the total –
possible occurrences (25), which equals 0.16. The quotient is multipliedz by 100 zoo and57
t star 58
SAMPLE,
* Raw score equals total number of occurrences of scored phonological processes.
r
Velar fronting
Percent (VF) for Core Phonological Processes
of Occurrence of 23Alterations
Manner
Vowel = Place Reduction % Voicing f
five 59
Number of Total Possible Percent of
v
SUPPLEMENTAL
Other phonological
s
medial consonant
Phonological Process Occurrences Occurrences Occurrences
Backing to velars
Vowel alterations
Medial devoicing
Phonological Processes
initial consonant
Cluster simplification (CS) of 23 = Stopping (other) % Overall Intelligibility
Initial devoicing
v seven 60
Medial voicing
Gliding (other)
0 0
Liquidization
Deaffrication (DF) of 8 = %
Reduction
Deletion of
Deletion of
Affrication
processes
Frication
(PPW)
Gliding of liquids (GL) of 20 = % or /h/
NOT FOR
Target 4 Target
of 36 = % Good Fair
Subtotal
Sound
Poor Word ITEM
Manner
ADMINISTRATION
Place
+ Subtotal
k 4
cup 4
Velar fronting (VF)
Initial voicing (IV) 0 of 23 = 0 %
of 33 = 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0
%
p
0 0 0 2 0 26 b boy 5
Cluster simplification (CS) 0 of 23 = 0 % Overall Intelligibility
p
Reduction
OR RESALE
duck 8
Final devoicing (FDV) 0 of 35 = 0 % k
Voicing
k
Initial voicing (IV) 0 of 33 = 0 % w quack 9
k
Copyright © 2015 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. t
Figure 3.9 Calculating the Percent Of Occurrence for Phonological Processes b
əl
table 10
m
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B C D E Product Number 0158012844
Completing the Vowel Alterations Section
Copyright © 2015 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. ŋ monkey 11
k
h
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B C D E Product Number 0158012844
The individual’s speech productions may contain vowel alterations. An in-depth vowel analysis summary is provided hammer 12 m
ɚ
on the last page of the Analysis Form. However, if you would like to place a general note about the individual’s vowel
fish 13
f
0158012844_KLPA3_AF.indd 1
0158012844_KLPA3_AF.indd 1 8/11/15 8/11/15 12:27 PM ʃ 12:27 PM
changes, space is included on the front of the Analysis Form. watch 14
w
ʧ
s
ɚ
The individual’s speech productions may reflect regional speech patterns that reflect dialectal differences from Standardweb 16
w
b
American English (SAE). Indicate if the individual exhibits any variations of SAE in the Dialectal Influence section on the d
front of the Analysis Form. Space is provided to report any additional information pertaining to the individual’s dialectal
drum 17
m
r
variations. The phonological processes should not be recorded for variations of SAE due to dialect because dialectalAnalysis Form
plate 18
9 KLPA–3
p j
l
variations are not scored as incorrect. t
n
0158012844_KLPA3_AF.indd 9 knife 19
8/11/15 12:27 PM
f
l slide 21
Rate the individual’s overall intelligibility by marking the appropriate rating for the individual’s speech in the Overall
d
Intelligibility section on the front of the Analysis Form. Intelligibility is based on the descriptive categories of Good,
Subtotal 1 Fair,
and Poor, and represents the clinical judgment of the examiner in combination with the analysis results. Additional space
is provided to report any other information pertaining to the individual’s intelligibility. KLPA–3 Analysis Form 3
j
SAMPLE,
Completing the Consonant Analysis
The Consonant Analysis on the second to last page of the KLPA–3 Analysis Form is an important component in planning
NOT FOR
treatment. It includes a phonetic inventory analysis and a Core Phonological Process analysis.
ADMINISTRATION
whether the individual’s phonetic repertoire is limited in some way. A phonetic inventory displays the consonants that
the individual produced in the initial, medial, and final positions as well as the consonants that the individual does not
produce (Eisenberg & Hitchcock, 2010). Each of the three tables represent the position of the sound within the target
word. Each table of the Phonetic Inventory is arranged horizontally by manner of production, and vertically by place
OR RESALE
of production. Within place of production, voiceless sounds precede voiced sounds. The organization of the Phonetic
Inventory by place, manner, and voicing enables you to observe additional phonological patterns, such as overuse of
labial consonants. See Figure 3.10 for an example of how to complete the Phonetic Inventory for Consonants in Single
Words. To complete the Phonetic Inventory for Consonants in Single Words, follow the directions below.
Single Consonants Produced Correctly
Examine each consonant production. On the KLPA–3 Phonetic Inventory for Consonants in Single Words, circle
any correctly produced phoneme in the appropriate position. For example, when house /haʊs/ becomes [haʊ],
the initial /h/ is circled because it was produced correctly.
Single Consonants Produced as Substitutions
For consonants produced as substitutions for other phonemes, place a mark in the upper left-hand corner of
the cell for the phoneme that was produced. For example, if elephant /ɘləfənt/ becomes [ɘwəfənt], the /w/ was
produced medially but as a substitution for another phoneme, so the cell for word-medial /w/ should be marked in
the upper left-hand corner with /l/. Similarly, if knife /naɪf/ becomes [daɪf], mark the corner of the cell containing
initial /d/, because /d/ was a substitution for /n/.
Consonant Clusters
Any consonant clusters produced by the individual are recorded in the area labeled Consonant Clusters. For
example, if blue /blu/ becomes [bwu], the cluster /bw/ is recorded in the space provided beneath Word-Initial
Consonants Produced. Similarly, if quack /kwæk/ becomes [gwæk], the cluster /gw/ is recorded. However, if
/kwæk/ becomes [gæk], the cell containing initial /g/ is marked.
m n ŋ m n ŋ m n ŋ
p b t d ʧ ʤ k g p b t d ʧ ʤ k g p b t d ʧ ʤ k g
ɵ ð ɵ ð ɵ ð
f v ʃ f v ʃ ʒ f v ʃ ʒ
s z s z s z
w
r
j h
l w
r
j h
r ɚ
l l l əl
SAMPLE, Age
2:0–2:5
Female
FDV, IV
Phonological Process
Male
DF, FDV, IV
NOT FOR
2:6–2:11 SR SR
3:6–3:11 DF
ADMINISTRATION
4:0–4:5 STR CS, ST, STR
5:0–5:11
OR RESALE
6:0–6:11 GL
7:0–7:11 GL
8:0–8:11 VOC
SAMPLE,
■■ Phonetic Inventory: Using the Phonetic Inventory for Consonants in Single Words, note any consonant or
consonant cluster sound change patterns. For example, it may be noted that an individual deletes all affricates in
word-final position and changes word-initial glides to [w]. These observations can assist in intervention planning.
■■ Core Phonological Processes: Any circled phonological process on the Core Phonological Processes Analysis
NOT FOR
table should be considered when developing therapy goals and objectives. For example, you may want to begin
working with an individual on suppressing the phonological processes that have been circled in the 2:0–2:5 and
2:6–2:11 age ranges because developmentally those are the phonological processes to be suppressed first.
ADMINISTRATION
■■ Supplemental Phonological Processes: Supplemental Phonological Processes should be considered along with
Core Phonological Processes when developing therapy goals and objectives. These phonological processes
frequently impact an individual’s overall intelligibility of speech.
■■ Other Phonological Processes: If an individual uses phonological processes other than the Core and
OR RESALE
Supplemental Phonological Processes, they should be noted. These phonological processes may be selected as
therapy goals because they may impact an individual’s overall intelligibility.
■■ Processes per Word (PPW): You can expect the PPW to decrease over time, with therapy. The PPW can be
tracked over time, and progress as indicated by the decrease in PPW can be included in progress reports.
Vowel Analysis
Phonetic Inventory for Vowels in Single Words
i u Fronting əe
leaf zoo
High Centralization
ɪ ʊ
pig cookie
e
Decentralization
e ə o
plate zebra soap Raising
Mid
ɘ ʌ ɔ Lowering
web cup frog
æ ɑ Diphthongization
Low hammer watch
Monophthongization
SAMPLE,
house
Diphthongs
knife
boy
ADMINISTRATION Fronting
• Vowel Phonological Processes Used ________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
OR RESALE
Figure 3.11 Completed Vowel Analysis
SAMPLE,
Normative scores derived from the Core Phonological Processes support the clinical utility of the KLPA–3 in
several ways:
■■ Scores are useful for diagnostic interpretation.
■■ Speech-language pathologists are often required by regulatory standards to report standardized scores reflecting
NOT FOR
an individual’s speech sound performance in order to determine eligibility for speech-language services.
■■ Scores can be quantified and operationalized for special purposes such as research.
ADMINISTRATION
KLPA–3 analysis provides norm-referenced information (i.e., standard scores, percentile ranks, and age equivalents)
that can be utilized with other diagnostic material to determine the nature and severity of an individual’s speech
sound disorder.
OR RESALE
Norm-Referenced Standard Scores
Norm-referenced standard scores are available to compare an individual’s performance to the performance of other
individuals the same age and sex in the normative sample. The scores are on a normalized standard score scale that has
a mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. This scale is commonly used in speech and language, psychological,
and educational batteries. Figure 4.1 shows the distribution of standard scores on the KLPA–3 and Table 4.1 shows
distances from the mean of selected standard scores.
Percent of cases
under portions of
the normal curve
Percentile rank
Standard Score
(Mean of 100 and
an SD of 15)
Figure 4.1 The Normal Curve and Its Relationship to Standard Scores and Percentile Ranks on the KLPA–3
A standard score of 100 on this scale represents the performance of the typical individual of a given age. Standard
scores between 85 and 115 correspond to one standard deviation below and above the mean, respectively; scores within
this range are considered to be within normal limits. Individuals with typical speech sound development would obtain
KLPA–3 scores in this range.
Criteria for identifying an individual as having a speech sound disorder vary among school districts and treatment
programs. For some agencies, 1 standard deviation below the mean is used as the criterion to qualify an individual for
enrollment in their programs, while others may use 1.5 or 2 standard deviations below the mean as the criterion. For
SAMPLE,
example, an individual age 5:6 obtains a standard score of 79 on the KLPA–3. If the criterion for enrollment in the school
district’s speech-language therapy program is a standard score of 77 or below (1.5 standard deviations below the mean),
a speech-language pathologist could not use a KLPA–3 standard score of 79 as evidence of a speech sound disorder
to qualify the individual for therapy in that school district. Even if the individual had scored 77 or below, it would still be
NOT FOR
inappropriate to refer him or her for services based solely on the obtained KLPA–3 results. Instead, the speech-language
pathologist should refer to the confidence intervals around the obtained score and further evaluate the individual using
other assessment protocols.
ADMINISTRATION
Confidence Intervals
Some degree of error is reflected in the score an individual obtains on any assessment tool. If an assessment tool were
perfectly reliable (and without any measurement error), an individual would always obtain the same score if given the
OR RESALE
measure repeatedly, and if no improvements to speech sound abilities have occurred. This score is a hypothetical true
score. Because no measure is perfectly reliable, the true score is expected to lie within a range of scores that reflects the
expected amount of measurement error.
One of the strengths of a norm-referenced assessment tool is that it specifies the size of the estimated measurement
error. The standard error of measurement (SEM) is the amount of error (in standard score units) you should consider
when you interpret an individual’s scores. The smaller the SEM, the more confidence you can have in the accuracy of the
score. The SEM is used to calculate the confidence intervals for the standard score an individual has obtained on the
KLPA–3. The confidence intervals for the standard score were derived by a method using the individual’s estimated true
score and the standard error of estimation, which centers the confidence interval around the estimated true score rather
than the observed score. Using confidence intervals, rather than a specific single score, enables you to state the degree
of confidence you have in a classification, eligibility, or placement decision based on KLPA–3 results. Therefore, reporting
a confidence interval around an individual’s score is particularly important in cases for which the score will be used to
make those types of decisions.
Each standard score is subject to a greater or lesser degree of measurement error, depending on the precision of the
particular standard score for a given age and sex. Because the SEM may be different for each standard score at a given
age and sex, the confidence interval (or range) will also be different at that age and sex. Standard score confidence
intervals required for 90% and 95% levels of confidence for the KLPA–3 standard score have been computed for you and
are presented in Appendix A in this Manual.
Figure 4.2 shows an example of score ranges for 90% and 95% confidence intervals. The 90% confidence interval for a
standard score of 78 on the KLPA–3 for a girl 6 years 1 month is 74 to 84. This means that you can be 90% confident that
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 6:0–6:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
13 78 74–84 73–85 7 89 84–95 83–96 23 13
14 77 73–83 72–84 6 88 83–94 82–95 21 14
15 76 72–82 71–83 5 87 82–93 81–94 19 15
16 76 72–82 71–83 5 86 81–92 80–93 18 16
NOT FOR
Figure17 4.2 Example
75 71–81
of Score Ranges for70–82
90% and 95% 5 Confidence 85 Intervals 81–91 80–92 16 17
18 74 70–80 69–81 4 84 80–90 79–91 14 18
19 73 69–79 68–80 4 83 79–89 78–90 13 19
Percentile Ranks
20 73 69–79 68–80 4 82 78–88 77–89 12 20
ADMINISTRATION
21 72 68–78 67–79 3 81 77–87 76–88 10 21
The KLPA–3 provides age-based percentile ranks for the standard score. Percentile ranks should not be confused with
22 71 67–77 67–78 3 80 76–86 75–87 9 22
the percentage
23 of71
correct answers.
67–77 Figure 4.1 shows percentile
67–78 3 ranks
79 in the normal
75–85 distribution.
74–86 Percentile8 ranks indicate
23
an individual’s
24 standing
70 in relation
66–76 to others
66–77of the same 2 age and sex 78 in the normative
74–84 sample.
73–85 They reflect
7 points on 24a
score25scale at or below
69 a given score, based
66–75 65–76on the normative
2 sample.
77 The mean 73–83standard score of 1006 is at the 50th
72–84 25
OR RESALE
26
percentile rank for68all ages. KLPA–3
65–74 64–75 ranks range
percentile 2 from < 76 72–82
0.1 to > 99.9, with 50 as71–83
the median. 5An individual 26who
27 a percentile
achieves 67 rank of64–73
25 performs 63–74
as well as or1better than 75 25% of other 71–81 70–82
individuals of the same5age and sex 27in
28 66 63–72 62–73 1 74 70–81 69–82 4 28
the normative sample. The percentile rank also indicates that 75% of the individuals in the normative sample obtained
29 66 63–72 62–73 1 73 69–80 68–81 4 29
better30scores. 65 62–71 61–72 1 72 68–79 67–80 3 30
Unlike31standard scores,
65 62–71 ranks61–72
percentile do not have equal1 71 and they
intervals, 67–78
cluster near66–79 3
the 50th percentile (i.e., 31
the
32 64 61–70 60–71 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 32
median). Consequently, for an individual who scores within the average range, a change of 1 or 2 total raw score points
33 63 60–69 59–70 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 33
may produce
34 a large
62 change59–68in his or her58–69
percentile rank.1 Conversely, 69 for an individual
65–76 who scores very 2low or very 34
64–77
high on
35 the KLPA–3,61 a change of 1 or 2 raw
58–67 57–68score points 0.5is not likely
68 to produce a large change
64–75 63–76 in his or2her percentile 35
rank. 36
Table 4.1 shows
61 percentile58–67ranks that correspond0.5
57–68 to selected67standard 63–74
scores and their
62–75distances1from the mean, 36
37
expressed 60
in standard 57–66units. 56–67
deviation 0.4 66 62–73 61–74 1 37
38 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 65 62–72 61–73 1 38
39 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 65 62–72 61–73 1 39
Age Equivalents
40 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 64 61–71 60–72 1 40
41 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 63 60–70 59–71 1 41
The KLPA–3 provides age equivalents that indicate the age at which a given score is equal to the median performance.
42 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 62 59–69 58–70 1 42
In order
43
to derive 55
age equivalents,
52–62
the total raw score that
51–62 0.1
corresponded
61
to a58–68
standard score
57–69
of 100 was0.5identified in43
each 44
of the 49 normative
54 age groups and50–61
51–61 assigned to the 0.1 midpoint60 of that group’s
57–67 age range (e.g., 4:5 for
56–68 0.44:0–4:11). 44If
the same
45 total raw53score was identified in
50–60 two successive
49–61 0.1 age groups59 (e.g., 3:6–3:7
56–66 and 3:8–3:9),
55–67 it was 0.3 assigned to45 the
46 age group
younger 53(e.g., 3:6–3:7).
50–60 If the same
49–61 total raw 0.1 58
score was identified in55–65 54–66 age groups
three successive 46
0.3 (e.g., 3:6–3:7,
47 and 3:10–3:11),
3:8–3:9, 52 49–59
it was assigned 48–60
to the middle age 0.1 group (e.g.,
57 3:8–3:9). 54–64
If the same range of total0.2raw scores47
53–65
48 51 48–58 47–59 0.1 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 48
corresponded to a standard score of 100 in adjacent age groups (e.g., total raw scores of 18 and 19 both correspond
49 50 47–57 46–58 <0.1 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 49
50 48 45–55 44–56 <0.1 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 50
51 47 44–54 43–55 <0.1 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 51
52 46 43–53 43–54 <0.1 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 52
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Chapter 4 ■ Test Interpretation 39
53 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 53
54 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 49 46–57 45–58 <0.1 54
Limitation 1
Age equivalents do not reflect an individual’s relative rank or standing among same age, same sex peers, and therefore
lack the precise information that within-group norms provide about rank within an age range. You can make judgments
about an individual’s relative standing only by using standard scores or percentile ranks (Lawrence, 1992; McCauley,
2001; McCauley & Swisher, 1984; Wiig, Secord, & Semel, 2004).
Because it does not give information about the range of scores for individuals in a specific age group, an age equivalent
does not give you the information you need to determine if an individual has a speech sound disorder.
Limitation 2
Small raw score changes may result in large changes in age equivalents. Large differences between age equivalents
and an individual’s chronological age may be obtained, but interpreting the individual’s speech sound skills as being
far below or far above average for his or her age may be unwarranted because the range of average scores overlaps at
SAMPLE,
adjacent age groups. For example, Child A, a female age 5:4 obtains a KLPA–3 raw score of 10 that corresponds to an
age equivalent of 4:6–4:7. Child B, a female also age 5:4, obtains a KLPA–3 raw score of 14 that corresponds to an age
equivalent of 4:2–4:3. Examining age equivalents alone might lead to the conclusion that Child A’s skills are 4 months
more advanced than Child B’s. In fact, Child A’s and Child B’s standard scores are 90 and 86 respectively, both in the
NOT FOR
average range compared with their same age, same sex peers.
Limitation 3
ADMINISTRATION
An extreme age equivalent (much lower or much higher than chronological age) does not signify that the individual’s
speech sound functioning resembles that of the extreme age group in every way. In addition, age equivalents at the most
extreme ends of the age range are particularly difficult to interpret because they may only be reported as being less than
2:0 or up to 7:0–7:2.
OR RESALE
Because of these limitations, it is not recommended that you use age equivalents as the primary scores for diagnosis.
Standard scores or percentile ranks must be used to compare an individual’s performance to others of the same age
and sex. Diagnostic decisions should be made from a review of the individual’s standard scores in conjunction with
background and qualitative information such as speech samples, primary caregiver/teacher interviews, and observations
of the individual in different communication contexts. Placement decisions or diagnoses should never be based on age
equivalents only or on any one type of score.
Table 4.2 Guidelines for Describing the Severity of a Speech Sound Disorder
Test Score Classification Relationship to Mean
115 and above Above Average +1 SD and above
86 to 114 Average Within +1 to –1 SD
78 to 85 Borderline/Marginal/At-Risk Within –1 to –1.5 SD
71 to 77 Low/Moderate Within –1.5 to –2 SD
70 and below Very Low/Severe –2 SD and below
Scores within 1 SD of the mean (between 86 and 114) are considered average. Scores below –1 SD indicate that the
individual is demonstrating below average to very low speech sound production skills relative to other individuals of
the same age and sex in the normative sample, which may or may not significantly impact intelligibility of speech and
participation in academic and/or social activities.
In addition to providing normative scores, the KLPA–3 provides a means for comparing an individual’s sound change
SAMPLE,
production against the standard of correct production. By comparing the phonetic transcriptions of these two
productions and the individual’s use of Core Phonological Processes, you can determine:
■■ which sound changes are used by the individual and under what conditions, or in which contexts,
NOT FOR
■■ the degree of consistency of an individual’s overall pattern of phonological process usage as well as his or her use
of individual processes,
■■ in what word position the individual has the most occurrences of phonological processes (i.e., initial, medial, final),
what types of phonological processes are observed most frequently for the individual (i.e., manner, place,
ADMINISTRATION
■■
reduction, voicing),
■■ if the individual uses phonological processes that affect a particular subset of sounds whether the sounds occur
frequently or infrequently
OR RESALE
■■ if the individual’s sound changes occur only on sounds that typically appear later in speech sound development
as opposed to sounds at many different developmental levels,
■■ if the individual’s “inconsistent” sound changes occur because of the influence of other consonants in the word or
adjacent vowels,
■■ if vowels are altered and whether there are patterns to these alterations, and
■■ whether the individual is using a relatively high average number of processes per word (PPW).
Case Studies
Case Study A (Female, Age 2:10)
History and Referral
SAMPLE,
A is a female age 2:10 who currently attends a private preschool/day care center. Her parents have been worried
because she is very unintelligible to friends and family. She had six middle-ear infections before she turned two years
old, which were treated with antibiotics followed by insertion of bilateral myringotomy tubes. She is no longer having the
ear infections, but is difficult to understand when she talks. Her teacher agrees and has also noticed that she doesn’t
NOT FOR
always understand or follow simple directions and seems “lost” at times. She states that A plays reasonably well with her
peers and is generally cooperative with others. She failed a recent speech screening at her preschool program and was
subsequently referred for a speech/language evaluation through the public schools.
ADMINISTRATION
Referral Questions
1. Does a full assessment confirm the recent screening results?
2. Does A have a speech/language disorder? If so, what are her strengths and weaknesses?
OR RESALE
3. What initial goals in therapy can be derived from A’s profile?
R E C O R D F O R M
A
Name: ___________________________________________________________________________
X N/A
Female
Male Grade/Ed. Level: ____________________________________ Age Calculation
___________________________________________________________
School/Agency: Small Daycare Year Month Day
English
Language Spoken in the Home: ___________________________________________
Test Date 2015 12 13
Dialect (if applicable): ______________________________________________________ Birth Date 2013 2 05
SAMPLE,
Mr. Speech-Path
Examiner: _______________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
Reason for Testing: speech sound difficulties Age 2 10 8
___________________________________________________________________________ Reminder: Do not round up to next month or year.
NOT FOR
Total
Raw Score*
Standard
Score
GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Words Score Summary
Confidence Interval
90% 95%
Percentile
Rank
Test-Age
Equivalent
Growth
Scale Value
ADMINISTRATION
114 62 59 – 66 1 < 2:0 453
OR RESALE
GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Sentences Score Summary
Confidence Interval
Total Standard Percentile Test-Age Growth
Raw Score* Score 90% A
95% N A LRank
Y S I S FEquivalent
O R M Scale Value
–
* Total raw score equals total number of articulation errors. See Chapter 2.
Linda Khan and Nancy Lewis
Comments: Age Calculation
A X Female u Male
Name: ______________________________________________________ u Year Month Day
Small Daycare
Grade/Ed. Level: __________ School/Agency: _________________________________________
Test Date 2015 12 13
Language(s) Spoken English
in the Home: _________________________________________________
__ Birth Date 2013 2 05
Mr. Speech-Path
Examiner: ________________________________________________________________ ____
speech sound difficulties
Reason for Testing: _____________________________________________________________ Age 2 10 8
____________________________________________________________________________ Reminder: Do not round up to next month or year.
92 68 65 72 2
Warning: No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any
–
means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.
< 2:0
Pearson,
* Raw score equals total number of occurrences of scoredthe PSI logo,
phonological PsychCorp, and GFTA are trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries
processes.
of Pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliate(s).
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Chapter 4 ■ Test Interpretation 43
Printed in the United States of America.
Percent of Occurrence for Core Phonological Processes Vowel Alterations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B C D E Product Number 0158012836
Number of Total Possible Percent of Notes:
Phonological Process Occurrences Occurrences Occurrences
Deaffrication (DF) of 8 = %
0158012836_GFTA3_RF.indd 1 7/24/15 3:04 PM
0158012879_KLPA3_MAN.indb 43 liquids
Gliding of (GL) of 20 = % 8/31/15 3:39 PM
Consonant Analysis
Phonetic Inventory for Consonants in Single Words
bm d n ŋ m
ʧt
n ŋ m n
pb ʧ t td
ŋ
kg
p b t d ʧ ʤ k g p b d ʧ ʤ k g p ʧ ʤ k
tf v ɵ ð bv ɵ ð tʃ bv ɵ ð
ts z ʃ f
ts z
ʒ f
ts z
ʃ ʒ
r w r
j th w
r
j h
r ɚ
l l l əl
SAMPLE,
Phonological Process
Age Female Male
NOT FOR
2:6–2:11 SR SR
3:6–3:11 DF
ADMINISTRATION
4:0–4:5 STR CS, ST, STR
5:0–5:11
OR RESALE
6:0–6:11 GL
7:0–7:11 GL
8:0–8:11 VOC
A’s GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Words standard score of 62 (confidence interval of 59–66 at the 90% level) is in the very low/
severe range. A’s KLPA–3 standard score of 68 Summary of Consonant
(confidence Analysis
interval of 65–72 at the 90% level) is also in the very low/
severe range. The results, along with her history, support the assumption that A has a speech sound disorder.
• Phonetic Inventory _______________________________________________________________________________________________
A scored below the 1st percentile on the GFTA–3 (multiple sound changes, including early and late developing phonemes
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
in all• Core
positions) and theProcesses
Phonological 2nd percentile on the KLPA–3 (excessive usage of Core Phonological Processes). A used
______________________________________________________________________________________
phonological processes that are expected for a child her age, such as deletion of final consonant and stopping of
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
fricatives and affricates. A also used phonological processes that are expected to be suppressed for a child her age,
• Supplemental Phonological Processes _____________________________________________________________________________
including final devoicing and initial voicing. Her phonetic inventory was limited to some initial stops and glides, some
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
medial stops, and some final stops and nasals.
• Other Phonological Process _______________________________________________________________________________________
Recommendations and Follow-up
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The concerns of A’s parents and teacher were confirmed by the results of the GFTA–3 and KLPA–3. A presents with a
• Processes Per Word (PPW) ________________________________________________________________________________________
speech sound disorder and would benefit from intervention. Initial goals and objectives should target (a) expansion of
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A’s consonant inventory to include other categories of sounds (e.g., nasals, fricatives, clusters), (b) suppression of final
devoicing and initial voicing, and (c) suppression of syllable reduction in two- and three-syllable words.
It is recommended that A’s speech sound skills be reevaluated in 6 months to document progress and jrefine
KLPA–3 goals
Analysis Form and 11
objectives, if appropriate.
Referral Questions
1. Does B have a speech sound disorder in the area of phonology?
2. If a speech sound disorder in the area of phonology is present, what is B’s profile of strengths and weaknesses?
3. What intervention recommendations can be derived from B’s profile?
Score Results
Hearing screening showed normal hearing, and there is no history of middle ear problems. Following the administration of
SAMPLE,
GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Words, a KLPA–3 analysis was completed. B’s GFTA–3 and KLPA–3 standard scores are presented,
along with the percent of occurrences for the Supplemental Phonological Processes.
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
R E C O R D F O R M
B
OR RESALE
Name: ___________________________________________________________________________
Female X 1
Male Grade/Ed. Level: ____________________________________ Age Calculation
This Elementary
School/Agency: ___________________________________________________________
Year Month Day
English
Language Spoken in the Home: ___________________________________________
Test Date 2015 11 10
Dialect (if applicable): ______________________________________________________ Birth Date 2009 8 6
Ms. Assess
Examiner: _______________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
Reason for Testing: Difficulty understanding his speech Age 6 3 4
at school
___________________________________________________________________________ Reminder: Do not round up to next month or year.
–
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Chapter 4 ■ Test Interpretation 45
* Total raw score equals total number of articulation errors. See Chapter 2.
Comments:
B X Male
Name: ______________________________________________________ u Female u Year Month Day
1 This Elementary
Grade/Ed. Level: __________ School/Agency: _________________________________________
Test Date 2015 11 10
Language(s) Spoken English
in the Home: _________________________________________________
__ Birth Date 2009 8 6
Ms. Assess
Examiner: ________________________________________________________________ ____
SAMPLE,
Confidence Interval
*Total Raw Score Standard Score 90% 95% Percentile Rank Age Equivalent
23 77 73 – 83 6 3:6 – 3:7
NOT FOR
* Raw score equals total number of occurrences of scored phonological processes.
ADMINISTRATION
Phonological Process Occurrences Occurrences Occurrences
Deaffrication (DF) of 8 = %
OR RESALE
Stopping of fricatives and affricates (ST) 1 of 48 = 2.1 % Dialectal Influence
Other phonological
medial consonant
Backing to velars
Vowel alterations
Medial devoicing
Phonological Processes
initial consonant
Stopping (other)
Initial devoicing
Medial voicing
Gliding (other)
Liquidization
Deletion of
Deletion of
Affrication
processes
Frication
(PPW)
or /h/
Target Target
Sound Word ITEM
ʤ
juice 56
s
z zoo 57
s
t star 58
r
f
five 59
v
s
v seven 60
n
Subtotal 4
1 7
SAMPLE,
Subtotal 1
1 1 1 12 Subtotal 2
14 Subtotal 3
NOT FOR
+ Subtotal 4
1 1 1 1 33
ADMINISTRATION
of 151 = of 111 = of 81 = of 159 = of 124 = of 59 = of 134 = of 58 = of 27 = of 41 = of 22 = of 11 = of 82 = of 60 =
OR RESALE
Administration of the GFTA–3 yielded some sound changes on early developing sounds (e.g., /k/, /g/) but mostly on later
developing sounds (e.g., /r/, /l/, clusters). The KLPA–3 analysis showed moderate usage of Core Phonological Processes
(no longer appropriate for his age), as well as several Supplemental Phonological Processes that are less commonly
observed. The Core Phonological Processes with the highest percent of occurrence were: cluster simplification, deletion
of final consonant, and velar fronting. The Supplemental Phonological Processes with the highest percent of occurrence
were initial devoicing and deletion of medial consonant. B’s Phonetic Inventory for Consonants in Single Words showed
a lack of consonants in word-final position, liquids changing to glides in consonant clusters in initial position, and few
liquids or velars produced.
Referral Questions
1. Does C continue to demonstrate a speech-language disorder characterized by CAS?
2. What is C’s current speech/phonological process profile with regard to the sounds in her phonetic inventory and
the phonological processes that she currently uses with frequency?
3. What recommendations can be derived for C following the assessment?
Score Results
Following the administration of GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Words, a KLPA–3 analysis was completed. The Clinical Evaluation of
Language Fundamentals (5th ed.; CELF–5; Wiig, Secord, & Semel, 2014) was also administered. C’s GFTA–3 and KLPA–3
standard scores are presented, along with the percent of occurrences for the Supplemental Phonological Processes.
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
R E C O R D F O R M
C
ADMINISTRATION
Name: ___________________________________________________________________________
X Female 2
Male Grade/Ed. Level: ____________________________________ Age Calculation
Hometown Elementary
School/Agency: ___________________________________________________________
Year Month Day
English 2015 10 15
OR RESALE
Test Date
Language Spoken in the Home: ___________________________________________
–
* Total raw score equals total number of articulation errors. See Chapter 2.
Comments:
48 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Chapter 4 ■ Test Interpretation
C X Female u Male
Name: ______________________________________________________ u Year Month Day
2 Hometown Elementary
Grade/Ed. Level: __________ School/Agency: _________________________________________
Test Date 2015 10 15
Language(s) Spoken English
in the Home: _________________________________________________
__ Birth Date 2008 1 2
S-L Therapist
Examiner: ________________________________________________________________ ____
SAMPLE,
Confidence Interval
*Total Raw Score Standard Score 90% 95% Percentile Rank Age Equivalent
NOT FOR
* Raw score equals total number of occurrences of scored phonological processes.
ADMINISTRATION
Phonological Process Occurrences Occurrences Occurrences
Deaffrication (DF) of 8 = %
OR RESALE
Stopping of fricatives and affricates (ST) 10 of 48 = 20.8 % Dialectal Influence
Other phonological
medial consonant
Backing to velars
Vowel alterations
Medial devoicing
Phonological Processes
initial consonant
Stopping (other)
Initial devoicing
Medial voicing
Gliding (other)
Liquidization
Deletion of
Deletion of
Affrication
processes
Frication
(PPW)
or /h/
Target Target
Sound Word ITEM
ʤ
1 1 s
juice 56
z zoo 57
s
t star 58
r
1 1 f
v
five 59
s
v seven 60
n
Subtotal 4
9 20
SAMPLE,
Subtotal 1
1 1 13 27 Subtotal 2
13 24 Subtotal 3
2 2
NOT FOR
+ Subtotal 4
1 1 37 73
ADMINISTRATION
of 151 = of 111 = of 81 = of 159 = of 124 = of 59 = of 134 = of 58 = of 27 = of 41 = of 22 = of 11 = of 82 = of 60 =
0.7 0.7 45.1
____% ____% ____% ____% ____% ____% ____% ____% ____% ____% ____% ____% ____%
71.7
OR RESALE
C’s receptive language skills were in the average range. Though C had incorporated gestures to facilitate her expressive
communication, her expressive language skills remained below average as measured by the CELF–5. Her speech
production continued to be difficult to understand, especially to unfamiliar listeners.
The GFTA–3 revealed multiple sound changes. On the KLPA–3 analysis, C’s phonological profile was characterized by
the frequent use of syllable reduction, cluster simplification, stopping of fricatives and affricates, and gliding of liquids.
C’s speech production contained altered vowel production 45% of the time during the KLPA–3. C demonstrated the use
of consonant harmony as her productions were influenced by the sound environment.
SAMPLE,
Feedback From Test Users and Others
Pearson test developers recognized the importance of obtaining feedback from test users in order to create a version
of the KLPA–3 that would best serve their needs. Prior to beginning item development, the test developers asked SLPs
NOT FOR
from across the country who were current GFTA–2 and KLPA–2 users to provide input about the assessment. They
were invited to complete questionnaires that asked about the GFTA–2 content, with regard to target words. Following
the questionnaire, items were developed, and members from Pearson’s speech-language advisory board completed a
content review prior to the start of the pilot research. In addition, a panel of SLPs with expertise in assessment of diverse
ADMINISTRATION
populations reviewed the items for potential bias. See Table 5.1 for a list of review panel members. During the research
phases, examiners who participated in the GFTA–3/KLPA–3 data collection also were offered the opportunity to provide
specific feedback about item content, formats, and directions. The feedback provided by these SLPs shaped the design
OR RESALE
and content of the KLPA–3.
SAMPLE,
Pilot Sample
Pilot data collection was conducted from February 2013 through March 2013. A sample of 31 individuals from San
Antonio, Texas participated in the pilot study. The sample included individuals from two age groups (2:0–5:11 and
NOT FOR
7:0–17:11) and included 18 females and 13 males. The sample consisted of 6% African American individuals, 6% Asian
individuals, 27% Hispanic individuals, 45% White individuals, and 16% individuals from other racial/ethnic groups. The
sample represented four parent/caregiver education levels: 16% completed 0–12 years of school, no diploma; 39% had
a high school diploma or equivalent; 19% had some college or technical school or an associate’s degree; and 26% had a
ADMINISTRATION
bachelor’s degree or more.
OR RESALE
research phase.
Tryout Research
The GFTA–3/KLPA–3 tryout objectives were primarily focused on the sound targets for each word. Specifically, the goals
were to:
■■ evaluate how individuals who speak dialects of Standard American English (SAE) produce the target words, and
■■ determine the target words to be included for the standardization research phase.
Seventy-three ASHA certified and/or licensed SLPs in 14 states participated in the tryout data collection. Each examiner
submitted a practice test before being approved for tryout testing. Practice tests were reviewed for accuracy of
administration, recording of responses, and scoring. If there were errors on the practice test, a second practice test was
assigned and carefully reviewed when returned to Pearson.
Throughout testing, examiners received detailed written and telephone support. Newsletters featuring information about
potential testing problems and progress of the tryout research were also sent to examiners periodically during the tryout
phase. After testing, examiners completed a questionnaire about the appropriateness of content revisions and additions;
clarity of illustrations, administration directions, and scoring instructions; and ease of administration.
Tryout Sample
Tryout data collection took place from June 2013 through January 2014. A sample of 316 children ages 2:0–8:11 from
across the country participated in the tryout study. All individuals spoke English well or very well. Individuals may have
Statistical Analysis
During analysis of the tryout data, all target words in the Sounds-in-Words test were submitted to statistical procedures
such as CTT and IRT analyses. The percentage of individuals who passed each item (p values), as well as the item-total
correlations, were calculated for each age group.
SAMPLE,
coverage of the speech sounds in all applicable word positions and provided opportunities for common phonological
processes to occur. Based on the results of the tryout research phase and authors’ input, test developers pared down the
item set to 74 target words to be used for standardization.
NOT FOR
Standardization Research
The purpose of the KLPA–3 standardization research phase was to collect data from a sample representative of the U.S.
population to determine:
ADMINISTRATION
■■ the appropriateness of including the KLPA–2 phonological processes in the KLPA–3,
■■ the most appropriate set of phonological processes for calculating standard scores, and
■■ normative scores with a sample that reflects the current diversity in the U.S. population.
OR RESALE
In this research phase, examiners collected the data digitally. Once Pearson received the data, phonological processes
were applied to the captured responses via a pre-programmed automated scoring system.
Standardization data collection began in November 2014 and continued through May 2015. One hundred ninety-eight
ASHA and/or licensed SLPs in 39 states participated in the standardization data collection. They met the same
qualifications as described for the tryout. In addition, the examiners participated in a training on how to administer the
GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Words test using a digital platform.
Throughout testing, examiners received detailed written and telephone support. Newsletters featuring information
about potential testing problems and progress of the standardization research were also sent to examiners periodically
during the standardization phase. At the conclusion of standardization, the examiners were asked to complete a
questionnaire about the appropriateness of content; clarity of administration, recording, and scoring directions; and ease
of administration.
Standardization Sample
Standardization data collection included a normative sample of 1,500 individuals. Additional samples were collected for
reliability and validity studies. For the youngest age bands (2:0–4:11), the normative sample included 100 individuals for
each 6-month age group. For the age bands 5:0–5:11 and 6:0–6:11, the normative sample included 200 individuals for
each 12-month age group. For the age bands 7:0–7:11 and 8:0–8:11, the normative sample included 100 individuals for
each 12-month age group. For the age bands 9:0–10:11 and 11:0–12:11, the normative sample included 100 individuals.
For the oldest age band (13:0–21:11), the normative sample included 100 individuals. In addition to the age requirement,
it was required that the data be collected based on sex with half the sample female and half the sample male to allow for
norms development based on sex. The sample was stratified by age, sex, race/ethnicity, geographic region, and parent/
Table 5.2 Distributionofofthe
4.2 Distribution theGFTA–3/KLPA–3
GFTA–3/KLPA–3Normative
NormativeSample
SamplebybyParent
ParentEducation
Education
Level, Level, Race/Ethnicity,
Race/Ethnicity, and Geographic
and Geographic Region Region
Normative sample US population
(%) (%)
Parent Education Level
0–12 years of school, no diploma 6.5 11.3
High school diploma or equivalent 18.7 22.4
Some college or technical school, associate's degree 38.5 34.8
Bachelor's degree or more 36.4 31.6
SAMPLE,
Race/Ethnicity
African American 11.4 14.7
Asian 2.1 3.7
NOT FOR
Hispanic 22.3 20.1
Other 7.1 5.8
White 57.1 55.6
ADMINISTRATION
Region
Midwest 23.6 22.3
Northeast 13.1 16.1
South 40.5 38.5
West
The GFTA–3/KLPA–3 normative sample was stratified according to the following four parent/caregiver education
level categories:
■■ 0–12 years of school, no diploma
■■ High school diploma or equivalent
■■ Some college or technical school, associate’s degree
■■ Bachelor’s degree or more
To determine parent/caregiver educational level, the highest grade completed by the individual’s primary parent/caregiver
was used as the stratification variable. Parent/caregiver education level was also used for individuals age 18 or older.
SAMPLE,
Standardization Research Results
During analysis of the standardization data, all target items were submitted to statistical procedures such as CTT, IRT,
and logistic regression analysis. Items were analyzed for difficulty, discrimination, and reliability of scoring. In addition,
NOT FOR
items were omitted if examiners reported that they were difficult to elicit and/or score. Specific to the KLPA–3, items were
reviewed for the possible phonological processes that could occur with each sound change in the target word. Based on
statistical analyses and examiners’ feedback, a final item set of 60 words was determined.
ADMINISTRATION
Coding of Phonological Processes in the KLPA–3
The KLPA–3 is based on systematically coding the sound changes that occur when a target word is misarticulated.
The coding process began with the authors identifying the phonological processes to be included in the KLPA–3. Each
OR RESALE
phonological process was mapped to the possible sound changes that could occur with each consonant or consonant
cluster in the target words for the final item set. The resulting sound change map (i.e., Sound Change Booklet) was used
to code all responses collected from the normative sample with applicable phonological processes (see Figure 5.2).
56
DFC LAB FV VF VF \ FV GR FV VF FV FRC FV FRC FV VF VF FRC FV (+)STR FV VF FV
Single LAB FV LAB FV (+)NAS LAB FRC NDEN FRC FRC FV (+)STR FRC PAL (+)STR FV LIQ Additional
Target k
Target Syllable Cluster Consonant Sound
(+)NAS (+)NAS (+)STR LAB NDEN (+)STR FRC PAL (+)STR AFF PAL LIQ PAL
Item Word Sound Del Del Del p b t d k g ʔ m n ŋ f v
(+)STR ɵ ð s z
(+)STR ʃ ʒ
PAL ʧ ʤAFF l r w j h Vowel Changes
CS
DIC LAB
IDV IV
LAB VF
IDV VF
\ \
BK IV
BK GR
IDV IV
LAB VF
(+)NAS IV
BK FRC
IDV IV
FRC FRC
IDV IV
FRC VF
IDV VF
FRC FRC
IDV IV
FRC (+)STR
IDV IV
PAL VF
LIQ IV
LIQ IV
GL(Oth) IV
GL(Oth) FRC
BK
LAB LAB IV IDV GR LAB
(+)NAS IV LAB
(+)NAS FRC FRC
LAB NDEN
FRC FRC
NDEN IV
FRC (+)STR (+)STR
FRC FRC
PAL PAL (+)STR IV LIQ
PAL GL(Oth)
LAB GL(Oth)
PAL IDV
dk (+)NAS (+)NAS (+)STR LAB NDEN FRC AFF PAL LIQ PAL LAB PAL
LAB (+)STR NDEN (+)STR PAL (+)STR (+)STR AFF FRC
0158012879_KLPA3_MAN.indb 56
(+)STR (+)STR (+)STR (+)STR PAL AFF AFF
8 duck ʌ DIC
CS
IDV
ST(Oth)
IDV
ST(Oth)
IDV
BK
IDV
(+)NAS
(+)NAS
BK
IDV
FRC
IDV
FRC
IDV
FRC
IDV
FRC
ST(Oth)
ST(Oth)
LIQ
LIQ
\ PAL
IDV
DFC ST(Oth)
LAB FV ST(Oth)
VF ALV
VF BK
\ ST(Oth)
FV GR
GR FV ALV
VF (+)NAS
FV FRC
FRC (+)STR
FV FRC
FRC NDEN
FV FRC
VF (+)STR
VF FRC
FRC (+)STR
FV IDV
(+)STR (+)STR
FV ALV
VF PAL
FV BK
w LAB ALV FV ST(Oth) ST(Oth) LAB FV (+)NAS (+)STR
LAB FRC NDEN
NDEN FRC (+)STR
FRC ALV
FV (+)STR PAL
(+)STR FRC (+)STR
PAL PAL
(+)STR FV LIQ FRC
9 quack k ALV PAL AFF
(+)NAS (+)NAS (+)STR LAB NDEN (+)STR FRC PAL
PAL (+)STR AFF PAL LIQ PAL
(+)STR (+)STR PAL AFF AFF
æ
CS
LAB
IV
VF
VF \
IV
GR
IV VF
IV FRC
IV
FRC
IV
VF VF FRC
IV
(+)STR
IV
VF
IV
IV
IV
FRC
DFC LAB FV
LAB VF VF
IV \ FV GR FV
LAB VF
IV FV
(+)NAS FRC
LAB FV
FRC FRC
NDEN FV
FRC VF
FRC VF
IV FRC
(+)STR FV
FRC (+)STR
PAL FV
(+)STR VF
IV FV
LIQ
GL(Oth)
GL(Oth)
k LAB FV LAB FV LAB FRC NDEN FRC FRC FV (+)STR FRC PAL (+)STR FV LIQ
k (+)NAS (+)NAS (+)NAS (+)STR LAB NDEN (+)STR FRC PAL (+)STR AFF PAL LIQ PAL LAB PAL
(+)NAS (+)NAS LAB
(+)STR (+)STR NDEN FRC
(+)STR (+)STR PAL (+)STR
PAL AFF PAL
AFF LIQ PAL
DIC CS IDV ST(Oth) IDV ST(Oth) IDV BK IDV (+)NAS (+)NAS BK IDV (+)STR
FRC IDV FRC IDV (+)STR
FRC IDV FRC AFF
PAL ST(Oth) ST(Oth) LIQ LIQ \ PAL IDV
DIC LAB
ST(Oth) IV \
ST(Oth) IV
ALV BK IV
ST(Oth) GR IV IV
ALV IV
(+)NAS FRC IV
(+)STR FRC IV
NDEN FRC IV
(+)STR FRC IV
(+)STR IDV IV
PAL (+)STR IV
ALV IV
PAL IV IV BK
wt LAB ALV ST(Oth) BK ST(Oth) LAB (+)NAS BK LAB
(+)STR FRC NDEN FRC (+)STR FRC
ALV PAL
(+)STR PAL
FRC (+)STR PAL LIQ LIQ GL(Oth) GL(Oth) FRC
9 quack (+)NAS (+)NAS (+)STR LAB NDEN ALV (+)STR (+)STR
PAL PAL AFF
PAL (+)STR
AFF PAL LAB PAL
(+)STR (+)STR AFF AFF
SR
e
æ
DMC
DFC MDV
LAB \
FV MDV
VF ALV
VF BK
\ BK
FV GR (+)NAS
FV (+)NAS
VF BK
FV FRC FRC
FV FRC FRC
FV FRC
VF FRC
VF FRC FRC
FV MDV (+)STR
(+)STR FV LIQ
VF LIQ
FV GL(Oth)
GL(Oth)
BK
te LAB ALV FV MDV MDV LAB ALV
FV (+)NAS MDV
LAB (+)STR
FRC MDV
NDEN NDEN
FRC MDV
FRC (+)STR
FV MDV
(+)STR (+)STR
FRC (+)STR
PAL AFF
(+)STR ALV
FV PAL
LIQ PAL FRC
10 table kb
teb (+)NAS (+)NAS (+)STR LAB NDEN NDEN (+)STR ALV
FRC (+)STR
PAL PAL
(+)STR AFF PAL LIQ PAL MDV
bəl (+)STR ALV (+)STR PAL PAL PAL AFF
ə
DIC
LAB
IV \
IV BK
IV GR
IV
IV
IV FRC
IV
FRC
IV FRC
IV FRC
IV
PAL
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
BK
əl
LAB
FDV ST(Oth) FDV ST(Oth) FDV BK LAB
FDV (+)NAS (+)NAS BK LAB
FDV FRC NDEN
FDV FRC (+)STR
FDV FRC PAL
FDV FRC (+)STR
FDV PAL LIQ
\ LIQ
PAL GL(Oth)
GL(Oth)
FRC
VOC
t
ST(Oth) LAB ST(Oth) BK ST(Oth) GR (+)NAS
LAB (+)NAS (+)STR
FRC LAB
(+)STR FRC NDEN FRC (+)STR (+)STR
FRC PAL AFF
PAL (+)STR PAL LAB PAL
l
LAB ST(Oth) ST(Oth) (+)STR (+)STR
LAB NDEN (+)STR PAL (+)STR (+)STR AFF
SR LAB (+)STR AFF
e
DIC
DMC DEN
MDV DEN
\ IDV ST(Oth)
MDV ALV BK BK IDV
GR \
(+)NAS ALV
(+)NAS BK IDV
FRC FRC IDV
FRC FRC IDV
FRC FRC IDV
FRC FRC IDV
MDV (+)STR LIQ LIQ GL(Oth) GL(Oth) BK
te IDV ST(Oth)
ALV ALV MDV
IDV ST(Oth) MDV GR ALV (+)NAS MDVFRC (+)STR FRC
MDV NDEN FRC
MDV (+)STR MDV
FRC (+)STR (+)STR PAL
AFF ALV PAL PAL IDV
FRC
10 table m
b
teb ALV ST(Oth) ST(Oth) (+)STR NDEN (+)STR ALV (+)STR PAL PAL
AFF AFF
PAL FRC
MDV
12 hammer
æ
m
hæm
hæ
mɚ
ɚ
DMC
DEN
MDV
DEN
MDV ST(Oth)
ST(Oth) ALV
ALV
BK
GR
ST(Oth)
\
FDV
BK
FRC
FRC
MDV
FRC
4 (+)STR
(+)STR
FRC
MDV
NDEN
FDV
FRC
NDEN
FRC
FRC
FRC
MDV (+)STR
(+)STR
ALV
FDV
ALV
FRC
FRC FRC
FRC
PAL
AFF
MDV (+)STR
PAL
AFF
FDV (+)STR
LIQ
ALV
ALV
LIQ
PAL
\
GL(Oth) GL(Oth)
PAL
BK
FRC
MDV
VOC
ST(Oth) LAB ST(Oth) ALV BK ST(Oth) GR LAB ALV (+)NAS FRC (+)STR FRC NDEN FRC (+)STR FRC (+)STR (+)STR AFF
ɚ
0158012887_KLPA3_SC.indd 4 LAB ALV ST(Oth) ST(Oth) (+)STR LAB NDEN (+)STR ALV (+)STR AFF 8/6/15 12:26 PM
LAB ALV
8/31/15 3:39 PM
Developing the KLPA–3 Scoring System
To develop the KLPA–3 scoring system, all instances of sound changes in the responses from the normative sample were
coded for phonological processes. Frequencies for each phonological process by age group was generated. Based on
this initial analysis, a set of phonological processes was identified as developmental. Then Rank Correlation of Observed
Responses and Predicted Probabilities analysis (ROC) was used to investigate the clinical utility of different combinations
of the phonological process usage. Using this procedure, 12 Core Phonological Processes were selected to calculate the
standard score.
Phonological processes that occurred less frequently are not used to calculate the standard score; however, these
supplemental and other phonological processes provide qualitative information. Their definitions are provided in
Chapter 2 of the Manual, and space is available on the Analysis Form to record their occurrences.
SAMPLE,
Standard Scores
The normative data presented in Appendix A are reported in 2-month intervals for ages 2:0–6:11, 3-month intervals for
ages 7:0–8:11, 6-month intervals for ages 9:0–10:11, 1-year intervals for ages 11:0–13:11, and 2-year intervals for ages
14:0–21:11 for females and males separately. A standard score presents an individual’s performance on an assessment in
NOT FOR
terms of the deviation (distance) from the average performance (mean) of all individuals assessed of the same sex in the
same age group in standard deviation units.
KLPA–3 normative information was developed using the method of Inferential Norming (Wilkins, Rolfhus, Weiss, & Zhu,
ADMINISTRATION
2005; Zhu & Chen, 2011). Various moments of distribution (i.e., means, standard deviations, and skewness) of each
score were calculated for each age group of the normative sample. The moments were plotted across age, and various
polynomial regressions (ranging from linear to 4th degree polynomials) were fit to the moment data. Prediction function
for each moment was selected based on consistency with underlying theoretical expectations and the pattern of growth
OR RESALE
curves observed in the normative sample. For each score, the selected functions were used to derive estimates of
the population moments. The estimated moments were then used to generate theoretical distributions for each of the
reported normative age groups, yielding mid-point percentiles for each raw score. These percentiles were converted to
standard scores with a mean of 100, a standard deviation of 15, and a range of 40 to 140. The irregularities associated
with sampling error were eliminated by smoothing. Appendix A of the Manual presents the standard score equivalents of
the total raw scores for each age group.
Note. The total raw scores for most assessments represent the number of correct responses produced. However,
KLPA–3 total raw scores indicate the number of instances of Core Phonological Processes used (i.e., sound change) by
the individual. Therefore, for the KLPA–3, a higher standard score represents a lower total raw score with fewer instances
of phonological processes used while a lower standard score represents a higher total raw score with more instances of
phonological processes used.
Age Equivalents
Age equivalents were derived to provide the age at which a given score is equal to the median performance. In order
to derive age equivalents for a test, the total raw score that corresponded to a standard score of 100 was identified in
each of the 49 normative age groups and assigned to the midpoint of that group’s age range (e.g., 4:5 for 4:0–4:11). If
the same total raw score was identified in two successive age groups (e.g., 3:6–3:7 and 3:8–3:9), it was assigned to the
younger age group (e.g., 3:6–3:7). If the same total raw score was identified in three successive age groups (e.g., 3:6–3:7,
3:8–3:9, and 3:10–3:11), it was assigned to the middle age group (e.g., 3:8–3:9). If the same range of total raw scores
corresponded to a standard score of 100 in adjacent age groups (e.g., total raw scores of 18 and 19 both correspond
Percent of Occurrence
Percent of occurrence scores indicate an individual’s standing not in relation to his or her peers, but in relation to the total
number of items on the assessment. Percent of occurrence scores were calculated for each Core Phonological Process
by dividing the number of errors for each phonological process by the total possible opportunities for the phonological
process to occur and multiplying that number by 100.
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
When using a standardized, norm-referenced measure such as the KLPA–3, you must be confident that the scores
obtained are reliable and valid indicators of the skill area that is being measured. The statistical properties of an
assessment tool provide evidence to support the score interpretations and intended uses. This results in greater
confidence in intervention planning.
Psychometric properties that are critical to interpreting scores include reliability and validity. Reliability in scores is
demonstrated through reliability coefficients (including internal consistency, test-retest stability, and inter-rater reliability),
standard errors of measurement (SEM), and confidence intervals. KLPA–3 validity is demonstrated by providing evidence
based on test content, response processes, relationship with the previous edition, and special group studies. The studies
reported in this chapter provide evidence of the reliability and validity of the KLPA–3 as a measure of speech sound
SAMPLE,
ability in the area of phonology in children, adolescents, and young adults.
Evidence of Reliability
NOT FOR
The reliability of an assessment tool refers to its accuracy, consistency, and stability of scores across repeated testing
under identical situations (Anastasi & Urbina, 1997; Sattler, 2008). Although this theoretical situation can never be attained
absolutely, various estimates of reliability can be obtained in practice.
ADMINISTRATION
The difference between an individual’s hypothetical true score and obtained score is called measurement error. A
reliable assessment tool has relatively small measurement error and provides consistent scores within and across
administrations. The reliability of a score should always be considered when interpreting an individual’s obtained scores
and when comparing differences between his or her scores on multiple occasions. The reliability of the KLPA–3 was
OR RESALE
evaluated using test-retest stability, internal consistency, and inter-scorer agreement.
where SD is the theoretical standard deviation unit of the scale and rxx is the reliability coefficient of the scale. The
reliability coefficients reported in Table 6.1 and the standard score SD of 15 were used to compute the SEM.
SAMPLE,
The SEM can also be used to calculate a confidence interval around an individual’s observed score. Confidence intervals
establish the range within which the score would occur if the assessment tool were utilized for the same individual again
(i.e., the range of scores within which the individual’s true score is likely to be).
Confidence intervals at 90% and 95% for the KLPA–3 standard score are reported in Appendix A. Suggestions for
NOT FOR
interpreting score results using confidence intervals are presented in Chapter 4.
Table 6.1 presents the internal reliabilities and the SEM of the KLPA–3 score in standard score units by sex and age and
by the overall normative sample. As the data in Table 6.1 indicate, the average alpha coefficient of the KLPA–3 is excellent
ADMINISTRATION
for both females and males, demonstrating a high degree of reliability.
OR RESALE
SAMPLE,
Overall alpha .94 .95
2:0–2:5 SEM 2.12 2.12
2:6–2:11 SEM 2.12 1.50
NOT FOR
3:0–3:5 SEM 2.60 4.50
3:6–3:11 SEM 3.67 3.00
4:0–4:5 SEM 3.35 2.60
4:6–4:11 SEM 3.67 4.24
ADMINISTRATION
5:0–5:11 SEM
6:0–6:11 SEM
7:0–7:11 SEM
3.00
3.00
3.97
3.97
3.35
3.35
OR RESALE
8:0–8:11 SEM 6.00 4.24
9:0–10:11 SEM 6.54 4.74
11:0–21:11 SEM 5.20 5.41
Overall SEM 4.02 3.75
The average reliability coefficients (rxx) were calculated using Fisher’s z transformation and are the average across age
ranges (Silver & Dunlap, 1987; Strube, 1998). These internal consistency reliability coefficients and SEMs were used to
determine the confidence intervals listed in the normative tables in Appendix A.
SAMPLE,
As the data in Table 6.2 indicate, the KLPA–3 score possesses excellent stability across time. The data also indicate the
mean retest scores are the same as the scores from the first testing
tab_3_retestStability
NOT FOR
Table 6.2 Test-Retest Stability
Table 5.2 Test-Retest Stability
First testing Second testing
Standard
Mean SD Mean SD r Corrected r difference
ADMINISTRATION
KLPA–3 102.9 10.8 102.8 11.2 .87 .93 –0.01
OR RESALE
The KLPA–3 is scored objectively using the Sound Change Booklet. However, scoring of phonological processes requires
accurate transcription of the sound changes for each target word and understanding of which specific phonological
processes apply to the sound changes.
For the inter-scorer study, a team of seven scorers used sound change responses from the GFTA–3 Sounds-in-Words
test that were captured during the standardization data collection phase. Scorers analyzed the recorded sound changes
and matched each sound change to the corresponding phonological process(es). Each phonological process was
counted as 1 point for purposes of calculating a total raw score (i.e., the total number of phonological processes across
all items). To ensure the accuracy of the KLPA–3 in identifying phonological processes related to sound changes, each
protocol was scored twice independently; once by the trained scorer using the Sound Change Booklet and once by a
pre-programmed automated system (developed for the Q-global reporting system). The KLPA–3 inter-scorer agreement
is computed as the percent of absolute agreement in the judgment of phonological process usage between the two
scorers (the trained scorer and the automated scoring system).
Inter-scorer reliability coefficients were calculated according to appropriate intraclass correlation procedures (McGraw &
Wong, 1996; Shrout & Fleiss, 1979). Total test raw scores were used in the analysis. As the data in Table 6.3 indicate inter-
scorer reliabilities were excellent for the KLPA–3.
Table
Table 6.3 RaterAgreement
5.7 Rater Agreementfor
forCore
CoreProcesses
Processes
Core processes Rater agreement
Manner
Deaffrication (DF) 0.97
Gliding of liquids (GL) 1.00
Stopping of fricatives and affricates (ST) 1.00
Stridency deletion (STR) 1.00
Vocalization (VOC) 0.99
Place
Palatal fronting (PF) 0.98
Velar fronting (VF) 0.97
Reduction
Cluster simplification (CS) 1.00
Deletion of final consonant (DFC) 1.00
Syllable reduction (SR) 0.96
Voicing
SAMPLE,
Final devoicing (FDV) 0.98
Initial voicing (IV) 0.99
NOT FOR
Overall 1.00
Evidence of Validity
ADMINISTRATION
Evidence of an assessment tool’s validity refers to the degree to which specific data, research, or theory supports that
an assessment measures the concepts it purports to measure and is applicable to its intended population (AERA, APA, &
NCME, 2014). The validity of an assessment tool is demonstrated by providing evidence to support the assessment tool
OR RESALE
scores’ interpretations and uses.
The evidence supporting the validity of the KLPA–3 was derived during the concurrent development of the GFTA–3
and KLPA–3; therefore, validity findings should be considered within this context. The KLPA–3 purports to measure the
application of phonological processes when evaluating articulation errors with consonant and consonant cluster sounds.
The validity of the KLPA–3 is supported by evidence based on test content, response processes, its relationship with the
previous edition, and the performance of a speech sound disorder (SSD) group.
SAMPLE,
more frequently during connected speech than in producing single words, productions of single target words may be
compared in a consistent manner. Comparisons using connected speech are more difficult because the words are more
likely to be inconsistent from sample to sample (or analysis to analysis).
NOT FOR
Evidence Based on Response Processes
The concept of response process refers to communication and cognitive skills used or behaviors engaged in by the
individual to respond to the items presented. Evidence of validity was gathered through empirical and qualitative
ADMINISTRATION
examination of response processes during the concurrent research phases of the KLPA–3 and the GFTA–3. Steps in
these phases included the analyses of administration, elicitation, comprehension by the individual, recording, scoring,
and interpretation procedures which ensure that the target sounds are being effectively elicited. Detailed descriptions of
OR RESALE
the development phases of the KLPA–3 are presented in Chapter 5.
As part of the concurrent development phases, analysis of individuals’ response processes consisted of pilot-testing
items in small groups to determine if the modified or newly developed items elicited the target sounds. The individuals
who participated in pilot testing were asked to provide feedback about specific target words.
Also during the pilot phase, examiner interpretations of behaviors and scores were informally evaluated. Test developers
reviewed the pilot test protocols to determine how items were presented, how individuals responded, and how responses
were scored and subsequently how responses were analyzed for phonological process patterns. Refinements to the
administration directions and target words were made based on this review and examiners’ recommendations.
Examiners participating in the tryout and standardization phases completed a practice case before being approved to
continue with data collection. Practice cases provided information about which directions needed to be modified for
the next research phase (standardization) or final product. Examiners completed questionnaires at the end of tryout
and standardization, providing further information for refining administration directions. A review of item p-values at the
tryout and standardization phases provided information about item ordering relative to expected trends in speech sound
abilities across age groups. In addition, decisions on item selection took into consideration the adequate sampling of
phonological processes when sound changes were made.
Evidence that the KLPA–3 is a good measure of speech sound abilities in the area of phonology is provided by the
developmental progression of total raw scores (i.e., the total number of phonological processes used in the production
of sounds in initial, medial, and final position). Generally, due to the relatively direct relationship between correct and
incorrect articulation with underlying phonological processes, developmental trends in speech sound production in the
area of phonology align with trends in the area of articulation. Construct validity evidence is provided by the relationship
of the KLPA–3 with the GFTA–3.
64 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Chapter 6 ■ Evidence of Reliability and Validity
SAMPLE,
process has a different rate of suppression; that is, some phonological processes are typically suppressed before others.
The order of suppression of the Core Phonological Processes was determined examining the rate of suppression of the
normative sample for each process. Phonological processes were each judged to be suppressed when 90 percent of the
entire normative sample had suppressed that process. Suppression is defined as the phonological process occurring
NOT FOR
15% or less in an individual’s speech sound production. Table C.1 shows the ages at which the core phonological
processes were suppressed.
Reading down the table reveals the general pattern of early to late development, with final devoicing, initial voicing, and
syllable reduction being suppressed early by both females and males while gliding of liquids appears to be one of the
ADMINISTRATION
most difficult or the last phonological process to be suppressed. As Table C.1 also notes, females and males in the
KLPA–3 normative sample present with different patterns for suppression of phonological processes.
OR RESALE
Evidence Based on Relationships With Other Variables
Understanding how an assessment tool relates to other assessments designed to measure the same or similar
constructs provides additional evidence of a test’s validity. The KLPA–3 was compared to the Khan-Lewis Phonological
Analysis (2nd ed.; KLPA–2; Khan & Lewis, 2002) to demonstrate the similarities and differences in the interpretation of
these two measures.
Table 6.4
5.8 Correlations
CorrelationsBetween
BetweenKLPA–3
the KLPA–3 and KLPA–2
and KLPA–2 Scores
Scores
KLPA–3 KLPA–2
Standard
Mean SD Mean SD r Corrected r difference
Standard score 99.4 17.3 103.1 10.2 .76 .74 0.26
SAMPLE,
As expected, the phonological process analysis scores have positive correlations. Despite changes in the scoring of the
GFTA–3, and the different sample characteristics on which the norms are based, the scores are highly correlated and
the effect size is small. This indicates that the KLPA–3 and KLPA–2 measure similar speech sound abilities in the area
NOT FOR
of phonology.
Although the mean scores for KLPA–3 and KLPA–2 are similar, there is a slight mean score decrease in the KLPA–3 score
over the KLPA–2 score. The score change may be due to differences in the normative samples and the guidelines for
ADMINISTRATION
diagnosis of a speech sound disorder.
Mean score differences may be attributed to the greater number of elicited sound production opportunities that can be
sampled and analyzed in the KLPA–3 versus those analyzed in the KLPA–2. Because the GFTA–3 provides a greater
OR RESALE
number of opportunities to produce target sounds than the GFTA–2, the KLPA–3 in turn provides a greater number
of opportunities for analysis of phonological processes. In other words, where the KLPA–2 allowed scores for only 61
individual phonemes in initial, medial, and final word positions and 16 consonant clusters in initial word position, the
KLPA–3 allows for the analysis of phonological processes for 123 individual phonemes, 23 consonant clusters, and
25 syllable components across 60 items, in their respective sound positions. Consequently, analyzing all instances of
consonants and consonant clusters instead of a select few results in slightly lower KLPA–3 standard scores. That is, if
both were administered today, it is more likely that an individual who is not developing speech skills normally will have a
lower standard score (i.e., a greater number of sound changes) on the KLPA–3 than on the KLPA–2.
SAMPLE,
Nye, 2000). Base rates for individuals receiving special education services under the classification of speech and
language disorder may differ from the base rate in the general population. The National Center for Education Statistics
(2012) stated that 22% of individuals, ages 3–21 and classified as having speech or language impairments, received
special education services in 2009–2010.
NOT FOR
Individuals identified with speech sound disorders are at risk for long-term academic and social difficulties. Longitudinal
research of individuals identified as having speech sound disorders document an increased risk for delays in pre-literacy
skills including phonological awareness (Preston & Edwards, 2010; Raitano Pennington, Tunick, Boada, & Shriberg, 2004;
ADMINISTRATION
Sices, Taylor, Freebairn, Hansen, & Lewis, 2007) and reading and spelling difficulties (Gosse, Hoffman, & Invernizzi, 2012;
Overby et al., 2012; Rvachew, 2007). For individuals with speech sound disorder and language impairment, additional
areas of concern include writing difficulties, overall poor academic achievement, and other learning disabilities that
are more persistent (Lewis, et al., 2015). These concerns contribute to diminished outcomes in adulthood (Johnson,
OR RESALE
Beitchman, & Brownlie, 2010). Studies show that a few individuals with early speech sound disorders do not resolve their
speech sound difficulties and continue to have diminished success in social relationships, educational and economic
advancement (Carrigg, Baker, Parry, & Ballard, 2015). However, speech sound difficulties typically are not persistent
and resolve by around age 8. Individuals with speech sound difficulties were less likely to have a persistence of speech
deficits and those who demonstrated improved speech sound functioning after intervention also exhibited gains in other
domains of academic functioning (Johnson, Beitchman, & Brownlie, 2010; Johnson et al., 1999). These studies emphasize
the significant impact that a speech sound disorder has on individuals, and that early intervention and successful
treatment may produce improved functioning in multiple domains.
A study of individuals diagnosed with speech sound disorder was completed as part of the concurrent validation of the
KLPA–3 and the GFTA–3. A sample of 54 individuals, ages 4:0–8:11 and diagnosed with speech sound disorders, was
tested and their sound change responses were analyzed as part of the KLPA–3 standardization validity research. The
age group for this study was specifically selected to reflect the age range of individuals who are most likely to receive
intervention services. The individuals in this study were recruited from speech-language pathologists who were providing
services in multiple sites across the United States.
Table 6.5
5.1 Demographic
DemographicCharacteristics
Characteristicsofofthe
theGFTA–3/KLPA–3
Speech Sound
Speech Sound
Disorder Disorder Sample
Sample
Speech sound
disorder sample
Sex
Female 25.9
Male 74.1
Parent Education Level
0–12 years of school, no diploma 20.4
High school diploma or equivalent 14.8
Some college or technical school, associate's degree 44.4
Bachelor's degree or more 20.4
Race/Ethnicity
African American 1.9
Asian —
Hispanic 16.7
Other
White
Region
SAMPLE, 11.1
70.4
NOT FOR
Midwest 48.1
Northeast 5.6
South 46.3
ADMINISTRATION
West —
The participants in the speech sound disorder study met specific inclusionary criteria. Each participant:
■■ Was diagnosed with a speech sound disorder (i.e., articulation, phonological disorder) as evidenced by a standard
OR RESALE
score of 77 or below on a standardized measure. The standardized test(s) must have been administered within the
last 6 months for ages 4:0-4:11 and within the last 12 months for ages 5:0-8:11.
■■ Was enrolled in speech services at the time of participating in the study.
■■ Was able to take the test in a standard manner without modifications.
■■ Was a monolingual English speaker or if a bilingual speaker, spoke and understood English very well. (Individuals
who spoke English as a second language were not included.)
■■ Had intact vision or corrected vision.
■■ Had normal hearing; those whose hearing was corrected could not exceed 10% of the total sample.
Of the 54 clinical cases, speech-language pathologists reported using the following assessments to qualify individuals as
speech sound disordered: 85.1% used GFTA–2, 11.1% used Clinical Assessment of Articulation and Phonology (2nd ed.;
CAAP-2; Secord & Donohue, 2014), 1.9% used Hodson Assessment of Phonological Patterns (3rd ed.; HAPP-3; Hodson,
2004), and 1.9% used LinguiSystems Articulation Test (LAT; Bowers & Huisingh, 2010).
Forty-nine of the individuals were reported to have a diagnosis of speech sound disorder in articulation, 4 were reported
to have a speech sound disorder in phonology, and 1 was reported to have both an articulation and phonology disorder.
Seven of the individuals in the sample were also reported to have an additional educational placement or diagnosis,
including apraxia, hearing impairment, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, a learning disability, an expressive and/or
receptive language disorder, or a language delay.
A matched control sample was selected such that each individual in the speech sound disorder group was matched
to an individual with typically developing speech sound production ability from the normative sample based on age,
As reported in Table 6.6, the effect size was large for the KLPA–3 score. These results highlight the ability of the KLPA–3
to discriminate between typically developing individuals and those with speech sound disorders in the area of phonology.
Diagnostic Accuracy
SAMPLE,
Another means of evaluating the clinical utility of an assessment tool is to analyze its ability to accurately identify
individuals who have a specific clinical condition of interest and to rule out that diagnosis. Specific to the KLPA–3, the
clinical condition of interest is speech sound disorder (SSD) in the area of phonology. Because classifying individuals
NOT FOR
as having a speech sound disorder specifically in the area of phonology versus articulation is a complicated issue that
prevents clear identification of base rates and definitive categorization between two groups, these classification validity
findings reported for the KLPA–3 will focus on speech sound disorder classification overall. Classification results based
upon the setting of specific diagnostic cut scores, such as –1.5 SD, is presented as positive predictive power (PPP) and
ADMINISTRATION
negative predictive power (NPP). Classification varies as a function of the cut score used, as well as the base rate for the
clinical condition of interest.
The base rate is most commonly thought of as the prevalence of the clinical condition in the population, but it is more
OR RESALE
clinically useful to think of it as the a priori probability that someone in the speech-language pathologist’s own referral
population will have the condition. This varies widely, depending on the clinical setting. According to estimates from the
National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (2010), the prevalence of speech sound disorder in
individuals averages between 8% and 9%, ranging from 24.6% for younger age groups to 2% among older individuals.
By the first grade, approximately 5% of children have noticeable speech sound disorders. In screening a population of
school age individuals, you can expect to identify about 10% of those you screen as “at risk for speech disorders and in
need of further testing.” As Table 6.7 indicates, 10% was selected as a base rate for screening the population of school-
age individuals and base rates of 60%, 70%, and 80% were selected for referral populations. Table 6.7 provides the
clinical validity statistics for speech sound disorders based on three cut scores and five base rates using the KLPA–3
standard score.
Values of PPP and NPP are provided for five different base rates: 10%, 80%, 70%, 60% and 50% (for matched sample).
Figure 6.1 shows the possible outcomes of a classification using an assessment tool. D represents someone who truly
has the disorder and ND represents someone who truly has no disorder. The outcomes are + (prediction of disorder)
or – (prediction of no disorder).
PPP is calculated using the formula:
PPP = (a × br) ÷ [(a × br) + (1 – br) × c]
where a and c represent the frequencies indicated in Figure 6.1, and br = base rate. PPP is interpreted as the likelihood
that a person with a positive result actually has the disorder.
+ –
D a b
ND c d
Figure 6.1 Possible Outcomes of Positive Predictive Power (+) and Negative Predictive Power (–)
Sensitivity and specificity are two additional diagnostic validity statistics that describe how an assessment tool performs.
Sensitivity is computed as a ÷ (a + b) and specificity is computed as d ÷ (c + d). Sensitivity indicates the probability that
someone who has the condition will score positive for it. Specificity indicates the probability that someone who does
not have the condition will score negative. These values do not depend on the base rate. This means sensitivity and
SAMPLE,
specificity provide overall summary statistics of how well the score can classify, although this overall summary can be
misleading for specific base rates. For example, a measure might have both high sensitivity and specificity, yet still have a
large false positive rate for conditions with high base rates.
Table 6.7 reports diagnostic validity statistics and adjusted PPPs and NPPs based on different base rates. The accuracy
NOT FOR
of test results depends on the base rate as well as the cut score, which is why PPP and NPP are used. For example, if
the base rate is low, such as 10%, with a cut score of –1.5 SD, then PPP = .62. This means that 62% of those who are
identified as having a speech sound disorder actually have it. This means that 38% false positives may be acceptable in
ADMINISTRATION
a screening situation where the concern is more on minimizing false negatives. The NPP in this instance is .98, meaning
that 98% of those classified as not having a speech sound disorder, indeed, do not have the disorder, leaving only 2%
false negatives. Conversely, if the base rate is .50 (half the individuals referred have a speech sound disorder), then the
PPP is .94, meaning only 6% of those classified as having a speech sound disorder are misclassified, and the NPP is .84,
OR RESALE
meaning only 16% of those classified as not having a speech sound disorder are misclassified. As the cut score becomes
more extreme (more SDs below the mean), the PPP becomes higher and the NPP gets lower. As the base rate becomes
higher, the PPP becomes higher and the NPP gets lower.
Table 6.7 also reports the sensitivity and specificity statistics for individuals with a speech sound disorder based on
cut scores of 1, 1.5, and 2 SDs below the mean for the KLPA–3 score. The results indicate good to excellent sensitivity
and specificity with cut scores at –1 SD, and –1.5 SD. With a cut score of –2 SD, specificity is excellent at 1.0, but with
sensitivity at .67, only 67% of individuals who have a phonological impairment will be identified as having a speech
sound disorder.
As reported, for the KLPA–3 score, the standard cut scores of 77 (at –1.5 SD from the mean) and 85 (at 1 SD from the
mean) result in good balances between the sensitivity and specificity measures. For example, using the cut score of 77
resulted in a sensitivity of 81% (0.81) and specificity of 94% (0.94). In other words, using the cut score of 77, only 19%
of children with speech sound disorders were missed and only 6% of children without speech sound disorders were
incorrectly identified as having speech sound disorders. Similarly, using the cut score of 85 resulted in a sensitivity of
93% (0.93) and specificity of 83% (0.83). In other words, using the cut score of 85, only 7% of children with speech sound
disorders were missed and only 17% of children without speech sound disorders were incorrectly identified as having
speech sound disorders. Based on Kirk and Vigeland (2014), for an assessment to be clinically valid, “sensitivity and
specificity must be at least .90 for one cut score. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value must be at least
.90 for at least one cut score and one base rate” (p. 371). Review of Table 6.7 shows that KLPA–3 meets this criterion for a
valid assessment of speech sound disorder in the area of phonology.
SAMPLE,
to make the most appropriate use of the KLPA–3.
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 73
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex
Ages 2:0–2:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 120 116–123 116–124 91 112 108–115 108–116 79 16
17 119 115–122 115–123 90 111 107–114 107–115 77 17
18 118 114–121 114–122 88 111 107–114 107–115 77 18
19 118 114–121 114–122 88 110 106–113 106–114 75 19
20 117 113–120 113–121 87 110 106–113 106–114 75 20
NOT FOR
21 116 112–119 112–120 86 109 105–112 105–113 73 21
22 115 111–118 111–119 84 109 105–112 105–113 73 22
23 114 110–117 110–118 82 108 104–111 104–112 70 23
24 113 109–116 109–117 81 108 104–111 104–112 70 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 113 109–116 109–117 81 107 103–110 103–111 68 25
26 112 108–115 108–116 79 107 103–110 103–111 68 26
27 111 107–114 107–115 77 106 102–109 102–110 66 27
28 110 106–113 106–114 75 106 102–109 102–110 66 28
29 110 106–113 106–114 75 105 101–108 101–109 63 29
OR RESALE
30 109 105–112 105–113 73 105 101–108 101–109 63 30
31 108 104–111 104–112 70 104 101–107 100–108 61 31
32 108 104–111 104–112 70 104 101–107 100–108 61 32
33 107 103–110 103–111 68 103 100–106 99–107 58 33
34 106 102–109 102–110 66 103 100–106 99–107 58 34
35 106 102–109 102–110 66 102 99–105 98–106 55 35
36 105 101–108 101–109 63 102 99–105 98–106 55 36
37 105 101–108 101–109 63 101 98–104 97–105 53 37
38 104 101–107 100–108 61 101 98–104 97–105 53 38
39 104 101–107 100–108 61 100 97–103 96–104 50 39
40 103 100–106 99–107 58 100 97–103 96–104 50 40
41 103 100–106 99–107 58 99 96–102 95–103 47 41
42 102 99–105 98–106 55 99 96–102 95–103 47 42
43 102 99–105 98–106 55 98 95–101 94–102 45 43
44 101 98–104 97–105 53 98 95–101 94–102 45 44
45 101 98–104 97–105 53 97 94–100 93–101 42 45
46 100 97–103 96–104 50 97 94–100 93–101 42 46
47 99 96–102 95–103 47 96 93–99 92–100 39 47
48 99 96–102 95–103 47 96 93–99 92–100 39 48
49 98 95–101 94–102 45 95 92–99 91–99 37 49
50 98 95–101 94–102 45 95 92–99 91–99 37 50
51 97 94–100 93–101 42 94 91–98 90–98 34 51
52 97 94–100 93–101 42 94 91–98 90–98 34 52
53 96 93–99 92–100 39 93 90–97 89–97 32 53
54 95 92–99 91–99 37 93 90–97 89–97 32 54
74 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:0–2:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 86 83–90 82–90 18 83 80–87 79–87 13 71
72 86 83–90 82–90 18 83 80–87 79–87 13 72
73 85 82–89 81–89 16 82 79–86 78–86 12 73
74 85 82–89 81–89 16 82 79–86 78–86 12 74
75 84 81–88 80–88 14 81 78–85 77–85 10 75
NOT FOR
76 84 81–88 80–88 14 81 78–85 77–85 10 76
77 83 80–87 79–87 13 80 77–84 76–84 9 77
78 83 80–87 79–87 13 80 77–84 76–84 9 78
79 82 79–86 78–86 12 79 76–83 75–83 8 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 82 79–86 78–86 12 79 76–83 75–83 8 80
81 81 78–85 77–85 10 78 75–82 74–83 7 81
82 81 78–85 77–85 10 78 75–82 74–83 7 82
83 80 77–84 76–84 9 78 75–82 74–83 7 83
84 79 76–83 75–83 8 77 74–81 73–82 6 84
OR RESALE
85 79 76–83 75–83 8 77 74–81 73–82 6 85
86 78 75–82 74–83 7 76 73–80 72–81 5 86
87 78 75–82 74–83 7 76 73–80 72–81 5 87
88 77 74–81 73–82 6 75 72–79 71–80 5 88
89 77 74–81 73–82 6 75 72–79 71–80 5 89
90 76 73–80 72–81 5 74 71–78 70–79 4 90
91 76 73–80 72–81 5 74 71–78 70–79 4 91
92 75 72–79 71–80 5 73 70–77 69–78 4 92
93 75 72–79 71–80 5 73 70–77 69–78 4 93
94 74 71–78 70–79 4 72 69–76 68–77 3 94
95 74 71–78 70–79 4 72 69–76 68–77 3 95
96 73 70–77 69–78 4 71 68–75 68–76 3 96
97 73 70–77 69–78 4 71 68–75 68–76 3 97
98 72 69–76 68–77 3 70 67–74 67–75 2 98
99 72 69–76 68–77 3 70 67–74 67–75 2 99
100 71 68–75 68–76 3 69 66–73 66–74 2 100
101 71 68–75 68–76 3 69 66–73 66–74 2 101
102 70 67–74 67–75 2 68 65–72 65–73 2 102
103 70 67–74 67–75 2 68 65–72 65–73 2 103
104 70 67–74 67–75 2 67 64–71 64–72 1 104
105 69 66–73 66–74 2 67 64–71 64–72 1 105
106 69 66–73 66–74 2 66 63–70 63–71 1 106
107 68 65–72 65–73 2 66 63–70 63–71 1 107
108 68 65–72 65–73 2 65 62–69 62–70 1 108
109 67 64–71 64–72 1 65 62–69 62–70 1 109
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 75
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:0–2:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 60 57–64 57–65 0.4 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 126
127 60 57–64 57–65 0.4 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 127
128 60 57–64 57–65 0.4 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 128
129 59 56–63 56–64 0.3 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 129
130 59 56–63 56–64 0.3 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 130
NOT FOR
131 58 55–62 55–63 0.3 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 131
132 58 55–62 55–63 0.3 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 132
133 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 133
134 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 134
ADMINISTRATION
135 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 135
136 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 136
137 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 137
138 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 138
139 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 139
OR RESALE
140 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 140
141 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 141
142 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 142
143 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 143
144 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 144
145 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 145
146 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 146
147 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 147
148 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 148
149 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 149
150 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 150
151 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 151
152 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 152
153 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 153
154 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 154
155 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 155
156 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 156
157 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 157
158 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 158
159–160 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 159–160
76 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:2–2:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 118 114–121 114–122 88 111 107–114 107–115 77 16
17 117 113–120 113–121 87 111 107–114 107–115 77 17
18 116 112–119 112–120 86 110 106–113 106–114 75 18
19 115 111–118 111–119 84 110 106–113 106–114 75 19
20 114 110–117 110–118 82 109 105–112 105–113 73 20
NOT FOR
21 113 109–116 109–117 81 109 105–112 105–113 73 21
22 113 109–116 109–117 81 108 104–111 104–112 70 22
23 112 108–115 108–116 79 108 104–111 104–112 70 23
24 112 108–115 108–116 79 107 103–110 103–111 68 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 111 107–114 107–115 77 107 103–110 103–111 68 25
26 111 107–114 107–115 77 106 102–109 102–110 66 26
27 110 106–113 106–114 75 106 102–109 102–110 66 27
28 109 105–112 105–113 73 105 101–108 101–109 63 28
29 108 104–111 104–112 70 105 101–108 101–109 63 29
OR RESALE
30 108 104–111 104–112 70 104 101–107 100–108 61 30
31 107 103–110 103–111 68 104 101–107 100–108 61 31
32 107 103–110 103–111 68 103 100–106 99–107 58 32
33 106 102–109 102–110 66 103 100–106 99–107 58 33
34 106 102–109 102–110 66 102 99–105 98–106 55 34
35 105 101–108 101–109 63 101 98–104 97–105 53 35
36 105 101–108 101–109 63 101 98–104 97–105 53 36
37 104 101–107 100–108 61 100 97–103 96–104 50 37
38 103 100–106 99–107 58 100 97–103 96–104 50 38
39 103 100–106 99–107 58 99 96–102 95–103 47 39
40 102 99–105 98–106 55 99 96–102 95–103 47 40
41 102 99–105 98–106 55 98 95–101 94–102 45 41
42 101 98–104 97–105 53 98 95–101 94–102 45 42
43 100 97–103 96–104 50 97 94–100 93–101 42 43
44 100 97–103 96–104 50 97 94–100 93–101 42 44
45 99 96–102 95–103 47 96 93–99 92–100 39 45
46 98 95–101 94–102 45 96 93–99 92–100 39 46
47 98 95–101 94–102 45 95 92–99 91–99 37 47
48 97 94–100 93–101 42 95 92–99 91–99 37 48
49 97 94–100 93–101 42 94 91–98 90–98 34 49
50 96 93–99 92–100 39 94 91–98 90–98 34 50
51 96 93–99 92–100 39 93 90–97 89–97 32 51
52 95 92–99 91–99 37 93 90–97 89–97 32 52
53 94 91–98 90–98 34 92 89–96 88–96 30 53
54 94 91–98 90–98 34 92 89–96 88–96 30 54
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 77
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:2–2:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 85 82–89 81–89 16 82 79–86 78–86 12 71
72 84 81–88 80–88 14 82 79–86 78–86 12 72
73 84 81–88 80–88 14 81 78–85 77–85 10 73
74 83 80–87 79–87 13 81 78–85 77–85 10 74
75 83 80–87 79–87 13 80 77–84 76–84 9 75
NOT FOR
76 82 79–86 78–86 12 80 77–84 76–84 9 76
77 82 79–86 78–86 12 79 76–83 75–83 8 77
78 81 78–85 77–85 10 79 76–83 75–83 8 78
79 81 78–85 77–85 10 78 75–82 74–83 7 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 80 77–84 76–84 9 78 75–82 74–83 7 80
81 80 77–84 76–84 9 78 75–82 74–83 7 81
82 79 76–83 75–83 8 77 74–81 73–82 6 82
83 79 76–83 75–83 8 77 74–81 73–82 6 83
84 78 75–82 74–83 7 76 73–80 72–81 5 84
OR RESALE
85 78 75–82 74–83 7 76 73–80 72–81 5 85
86 77 74–81 73–82 6 75 72–79 71–80 5 86
87 77 74–81 73–82 6 75 72–79 71–80 5 87
88 76 73–80 72–81 5 74 71–78 70–79 4 88
89 76 73–80 72–81 5 74 71–78 70–79 4 89
90 75 72–79 71–80 5 73 70–77 69–78 4 90
91 75 72–79 71–80 5 73 70–77 69–78 4 91
92 74 71–78 70–79 4 73 70–77 69–78 4 92
93 74 71–78 70–79 4 72 69–76 68–77 3 93
94 73 70–77 69–78 4 72 69–76 68–77 3 94
95 73 70–77 69–78 4 71 68–75 68–76 3 95
96 72 69–76 68–77 3 71 68–75 68–76 3 96
97 72 69–76 68–77 3 70 67–74 67–75 2 97
98 71 68–75 68–76 3 70 67–74 67–75 2 98
99 71 68–75 68–76 3 69 66–73 66–74 2 99
100 70 67–74 67–75 2 69 66–73 66–74 2 100
101 70 67–74 67–75 2 68 65–72 65–73 2 101
102 69 66–73 66–74 2 68 65–72 65–73 2 102
103 69 66–73 66–74 2 67 64–71 64–72 1 103
104 68 65–72 65–73 2 67 64–71 64–72 1 104
105 68 65–72 65–73 2 66 63–70 63–71 1 105
106 67 64–71 64–72 1 66 63–70 63–71 1 106
107 67 64–71 64–72 1 65 62–69 62–70 1 107
108 66 63–70 63–71 1 65 62–69 62–70 1 108
109 66 63–70 63–71 1 64 61–68 61–69 1 109
78 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:2–2:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 59 56–63 56–64 0.3 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 126
127 59 56–63 56–64 0.3 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 127
128 59 56–63 56–64 0.3 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 128
129 58 55–62 55–63 0.3 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 129
130 58 55–62 55–63 0.3 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 130
NOT FOR
131 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 131
132 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 132
133 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 133
134 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 134
ADMINISTRATION
135 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 135
136 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 136
137 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 137
138 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 138
139 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 139
OR RESALE
140 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 140
141 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 141
142 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 142
143 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 143
144 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 144
145 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 145
146 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 146
147 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 147
148 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 148
149 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 149
150 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 150
151 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 151
152 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 152
153 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 153
154 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 154
155 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 155
156 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 156
157 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 157
158–160 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 158–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 79
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:4–2:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 116 112–119 112–120 86 111 107–114 107–115 77 16
17 115 111–118 111–119 84 110 106–113 106–114 75 17
18 114 110–117 110–118 82 110 106–113 106–114 75 18
19 113 109–116 109–117 81 109 105–112 105–113 73 19
20 112 108–115 108–116 79 109 105–112 105–113 73 20
NOT FOR
21 112 108–115 108–116 79 108 104–111 104–112 70 21
22 111 107–114 107–115 77 108 104–111 104–112 70 22
23 111 107–114 107–115 77 107 103–110 103–111 68 23
24 110 106–113 106–114 75 107 103–110 103–111 68 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 110 106–113 106–114 75 106 102–109 102–110 66 25
26 109 105–112 105–113 73 106 102–109 102–110 66 26
27 108 104–111 104–112 70 105 101–108 101–109 63 27
28 108 104–111 104–112 70 105 101–108 101–109 63 28
29 107 103–110 103–111 68 104 101–107 100–108 61 29
OR RESALE
30 107 103–110 103–111 68 104 101–107 100–108 61 30
31 106 102–109 102–110 66 103 100–106 99–107 58 31
32 105 101–108 101–109 63 103 100–106 99–107 58 32
33 105 101–108 101–109 63 102 99–105 98–106 55 33
34 104 101–107 100–108 61 101 98–104 97–105 53 34
35 103 100–106 99–107 58 101 98–104 97–105 53 35
36 102 99–105 98–106 55 100 97–103 96–104 50 36
37 102 99–105 98–106 55 100 97–103 96–104 50 37
38 101 98–104 97–105 53 99 96–102 95–103 47 38
39 100 97–103 96–104 50 99 96–102 95–103 47 39
40 100 97–103 96–104 50 98 95–101 94–102 45 40
41 99 96–102 95–103 47 98 95–101 94–102 45 41
42 99 96–102 95–103 47 97 94–100 93–101 42 42
43 98 95–101 94–102 45 97 94–100 93–101 42 43
44 98 95–101 94–102 45 96 93–99 92–100 39 44
45 97 94–100 93–101 42 96 93–99 92–100 39 45
46 96 93–99 92–100 39 95 92–99 91–99 37 46
47 96 93–99 92–100 39 95 92–99 91–99 37 47
48 95 92–99 91–99 37 94 91–98 90–98 34 48
49 94 91–98 90–98 34 94 91–98 90–98 34 49
50 94 91–98 90–98 34 93 90–97 89–97 32 50
51 93 90–97 89–97 32 93 90–97 89–97 32 51
52 93 90–97 89–97 32 92 89–96 88–96 30 52
53 92 89–96 88–96 30 92 89–96 88–96 30 53
54 91 88–95 87–95 27 91 88–95 87–95 27 54
80 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:4–2:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 83 80–87 79–87 13 82 79–86 78–86 12 71
72 82 79–86 78–86 12 81 78–85 77–85 10 72
73 82 79–86 78–86 12 81 78–85 77–85 10 73
74 81 78–85 77–85 10 80 77–84 76–84 9 74
75 81 78–85 77–85 10 80 77–84 76–84 9 75
NOT FOR
76 80 77–84 76–84 9 79 76–83 75–83 8 76
77 80 77–84 76–84 9 79 76–83 75–83 8 77
78 79 76–83 75–83 8 78 75–82 74–83 7 78
79 79 76–83 75–83 8 78 75–82 74–83 7 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 78 75–82 74–83 7 77 74–81 73–82 6 80
81 78 75–82 74–83 7 77 74–81 73–82 6 81
82 77 74–81 73–82 6 76 73–80 72–81 5 82
83 77 74–81 73–82 6 76 73–80 72–81 5 83
84 76 73–80 72–81 5 75 72–79 71–80 5 84
OR RESALE
85 76 73–80 72–81 5 75 72–79 71–80 5 85
86 75 72–79 71–80 5 74 71–78 70–79 4 86
87 75 72–79 71–80 5 74 71–78 70–79 4 87
88 74 71–78 70–79 4 73 70–77 69–78 4 88
89 74 71–78 70–79 4 73 70–77 69–78 4 89
90 73 70–77 69–78 4 72 69–76 68–77 3 90
91 73 70–77 69–78 4 72 69–76 68–77 3 91
92 72 69–76 68–77 3 72 69–76 68–77 3 92
93 72 69–76 68–77 3 71 68–75 68–76 3 93
94 71 68–75 68–76 3 71 68–75 68–76 3 94
95 71 68–75 68–76 3 70 67–74 67–75 2 95
96 70 67–74 67–75 2 70 67–74 67–75 2 96
97 70 67–74 67–75 2 69 66–73 66–74 2 97
98 69 66–73 66–74 2 69 66–73 66–74 2 98
99 69 66–73 66–74 2 68 65–72 65–73 2 99
100 68 65–72 65–73 2 68 65–72 65–73 2 100
101 68 65–72 65–73 2 67 64–71 64–72 1 101
102 68 65–72 65–73 2 67 64–71 64–72 1 102
103 67 64–71 64–72 1 66 63–70 63–71 1 103
104 67 64–71 64–72 1 66 63–70 63–71 1 104
105 66 63–70 63–71 1 65 62–69 62–70 1 105
106 66 63–70 63–71 1 65 62–69 62–70 1 106
107 66 63–70 63–71 1 64 61–68 61–69 1 107
108 65 62–69 62–70 1 64 61–68 61–69 1 108
109 65 62–69 62–70 1 63 60–67 60–68 1 109
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 81
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:4–2:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 58 55–62 55–63 0.3 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 126
127 58 55–62 55–63 0.3 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 127
128 58 55–62 55–63 0.3 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 128
129 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 129
130 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 130
NOT FOR
131 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 131
132 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 132
133 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 133
134 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 134
ADMINISTRATION
135 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 135
136 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 136
137 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 137
138 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 138
139 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 139
OR RESALE
140 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 140
141 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 141
142 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 142
143 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 143
144 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 144
145 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 145
146 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 146
147 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 147
148 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 148
149 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 149
150 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 150
151 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 151
152 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 152
153 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 153
154 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 154
155 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 155
156 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 156
157–160 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 157–160
82 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:6–2:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 114 110–117 110–118 82 110 107–112 107–113 75 16
17 113 109–116 109–117 81 110 107–112 107–113 75 17
18 113 109–116 109–117 81 109 106–111 106–112 73 18
19 112 108–115 108–116 79 109 106–111 106–112 73 19
20 111 107–114 107–115 77 108 105–110 105–111 70 20
NOT FOR
21 110 106–113 106–114 75 108 105–110 105–111 70 21
22 109 105–112 105–113 73 107 104–109 104–110 68 22
23 108 104–111 104–112 70 107 104–109 104–110 68 23
24 108 104–111 104–112 70 106 103–108 103–109 66 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 107 103–110 103–111 68 106 103–108 103–109 66 25
26 106 102–109 102–110 66 105 103–107 102–108 63 26
27 106 102–109 102–110 66 105 103–107 102–108 63 27
28 105 101–108 101–109 63 104 102–106 101–107 61 28
29 105 101–108 101–109 63 104 102–106 101–107 61 29
OR RESALE
30 104 101–107 100–108 61 103 101–105 100–106 58 30
31 103 100–106 99–107 58 103 101–105 100–106 58 31
32 103 100–106 99–107 58 102 100–104 99–105 55 32
33 102 99–105 98–106 55 102 100–104 99–105 55 33
34 102 99–105 98–106 55 101 99–103 98–104 53 34
35 101 98–104 97–105 53 100 98–102 97–103 50 35
36 100 97–103 96–104 50 100 98–102 97–103 50 36
37 99 96–102 95–103 47 99 97–101 96–102 47 37
38 99 96–102 95–103 47 99 97–101 96–102 47 38
39 98 95–101 94–102 45 98 96–100 95–101 45 39
40 98 95–101 94–102 45 98 96–100 95–101 45 40
41 97 94–100 93–101 42 97 95–99 94–100 42 41
42 97 94–100 93–101 42 97 95–99 94–100 42 42
43 96 93–99 92–100 39 96 94–98 93–99 39 43
44 95 92–99 91–99 37 96 94–98 93–99 39 44
45 94 91–98 90–98 34 95 93–97 92–98 37 45
46 94 91–98 90–98 34 95 93–97 92–98 37 46
47 93 90–97 89–97 32 94 92–97 91–97 34 47
48 93 90–97 89–97 32 94 92–97 91–97 34 48
49 92 89–96 88–96 30 93 91–96 90–96 32 49
50 92 89–96 88–96 30 93 91–96 90–96 32 50
51 91 88–95 87–95 27 92 90–95 89–95 30 51
52 91 88–95 87–95 27 92 90–95 89–95 30 52
53 90 87–94 86–94 25 91 89–94 88–94 27 53
54 90 87–94 86–94 25 90 88–93 87–93 25 54
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 83
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:6–2:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 81 78–85 77–85 10 81 79–84 78–84 10 71
72 80 77–84 76–84 9 80 78–83 77–83 9 72
73 80 77–84 76–84 9 80 78–83 77–83 9 73
74 79 76–83 75–83 8 79 77–82 76–82 8 74
75 79 76–83 75–83 8 79 77–82 76–82 8 75
NOT FOR
76 78 75–82 74–83 7 78 76–81 75–81 7 76
77 78 75–82 74–83 7 78 76–81 75–81 7 77
78 77 74–81 73–82 6 77 75–80 74–80 6 78
79 77 74–81 73–82 6 77 75–80 74–80 6 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 76 73–80 72–81 5 76 74–79 73–79 5 80
81 76 73–80 72–81 5 76 74–79 73–79 5 81
82 75 72–79 71–80 5 75 73–78 72–78 5 82
83 75 72–79 71–80 5 75 73–78 72–78 5 83
84 74 71–78 70–79 4 75 73–78 72–78 5 84
OR RESALE
85 74 71–78 70–79 4 74 72–77 71–77 4 85
86 73 70–77 69–78 4 74 72–77 71–77 4 86
87 73 70–77 69–78 4 73 71–76 70–76 4 87
88 72 69–76 68–77 3 73 71–76 70–76 4 88
89 72 69–76 68–77 3 73 71–76 70–76 4 89
90 71 68–75 68–76 3 72 70–75 69–75 3 90
91 71 68–75 68–76 3 72 70–75 69–75 3 91
92 70 67–74 67–75 2 71 69–74 68–74 3 92
93 70 67–74 67–75 2 71 69–74 68–74 3 93
94 69 66–73 66–74 2 70 68–73 67–73 2 94
95 69 66–73 66–74 2 70 68–73 67–73 2 95
96 69 66–73 66–74 2 69 67–72 66–72 2 96
97 68 65–72 65–73 2 69 67–72 66–72 2 97
98 68 65–72 65–73 2 68 66–71 65–71 2 98
99 67 64–71 64–72 1 68 66–71 65–71 2 99
100 67 64–71 64–72 1 67 65–70 64–70 1 100
101 67 64–71 64–72 1 67 65–70 64–70 1 101
102 66 63–70 63–71 1 66 64–69 63–69 1 102
103 66 63–70 63–71 1 66 64–69 63–69 1 103
104 65 62–69 62–70 1 65 63–68 62–68 1 104
105 65 62–69 62–70 1 65 63–68 62–68 1 105
106 64 61–68 61–69 1 64 62–67 61–67 1 106
107 64 61–68 61–69 1 64 62–67 61–67 1 107
108 64 61–68 61–69 1 63 61–66 60–66 1 108
109 63 60–67 60–68 1 63 61–66 60–66 1 109
84 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:6–2:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 57 54–61 54–62 0.2 56 54–59 54–59 0.2 126
127 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 55 53–58 53–58 0.1 127
128 56 53–60 53–61 0.2 54 52–57 52–57 0.1 128
129 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 54 52–57 52–57 0.1 129
130 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 53 51–56 51–56 0.1 130
NOT FOR
131 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 53 51–56 51–56 0.1 131
132 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 52 50–55 50–55 0.1 132
133 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 52 50–55 50–55 0.1 133
134 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 51 49–54 49–54 0.1 134
ADMINISTRATION
135 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 51 49–54 49–54 0.1 135
136 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 50 48–53 48–53 <0.1 136
137 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 50 48–53 48–53 <0.1 137
138 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 49 47–52 47–52 <0.1 138
139 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 49 47–52 47–52 <0.1 139
OR RESALE
140 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 48 46–51 46–51 <0.1 140
141 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 48 46–51 46–51 <0.1 141
142 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 47 45–50 45–50 <0.1 142
143 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 47 45–50 45–50 <0.1 143
144 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 46 44–49 44–49 <0.1 144
145 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 46 44–49 44–49 <0.1 145
146 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 45 43–48 43–48 <0.1 146
147 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 45 43–48 43–48 <0.1 147
148 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 44 42–47 42–47 <0.1 148
149 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 44 42–47 42–47 <0.1 149
150 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 43 41–46 41–46 <0.1 150
151 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 43 41–46 41–46 <0.1 151
152 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 42 40–45 40–45 <0.1 152
153 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 42 40–45 40–45 <0.1 153
154 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 41 39–44 39–45 <0.1 154
155 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 41 39–44 39–45 <0.1 155
156–160 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 40 38–43 38–44 <0.1 156–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 85
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:8–2:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 112 108–115 108–116 79 109 106–111 106–112 73 16
17 111 107–114 107–115 77 109 106–111 106–112 73 17
18 110 106–113 106–114 75 108 105–110 105–111 70 18
19 109 105–112 105–113 73 108 105–110 105–111 70 19
20 108 104–111 104–112 70 107 104–109 104–110 68 20
NOT FOR
21 107 103–110 103–111 68 107 104–109 104–110 68 21
22 107 103–110 103–111 68 106 103–108 103–109 66 22
23 106 102–109 102–110 66 106 103–108 103–109 66 23
24 105 101–108 101–109 63 105 103–107 102–108 63 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 105 101–108 101–109 63 105 103–107 102–108 63 25
26 104 101–107 100–108 61 104 102–106 101–107 61 26
27 103 100–106 99–107 58 104 102–106 101–107 61 27
28 102 99–105 98–106 55 103 101–105 100–106 58 28
29 102 99–105 98–106 55 103 101–105 100–106 58 29
OR RESALE
30 101 98–104 97–105 53 102 100–104 99–105 55 30
31 100 97–103 96–104 50 102 100–104 99–105 55 31
32 99 96–102 95–103 47 101 99–103 98–104 53 32
33 98 95–101 94–102 45 101 99–103 98–104 53 33
34 98 95–101 94–102 45 100 98–102 97–103 50 34
35 97 94–100 93–101 42 99 97–101 96–102 47 35
36 97 94–100 93–101 42 99 97–101 96–102 47 36
37 96 93–99 92–100 39 98 96–100 95–101 45 37
38 95 92–99 91–99 37 98 96–100 95–101 45 38
39 95 92–99 91–99 37 97 95–99 94–100 42 39
40 94 91–98 90–98 34 97 95–99 94–100 42 40
41 94 91–98 90–98 34 96 94–98 93–99 39 41
42 93 90–97 89–97 32 96 94–98 93–99 39 42
43 93 90–97 89–97 32 95 93–97 92–98 37 43
44 93 90–97 89–97 32 95 93–97 92–98 37 44
45 92 89–96 88–96 30 94 92–97 91–97 34 45
46 92 89–96 88–96 30 94 92–97 91–97 34 46
47 91 88–95 87–95 27 93 91–96 90–96 32 47
48 91 88–95 87–95 27 93 91–96 90–96 32 48
49 90 87–94 86–94 25 92 90–95 89–95 30 49
50 90 87–94 86–94 25 91 89–94 88–94 27 50
51 89 86–93 85–93 23 91 89–94 88–94 27 51
52 89 86–93 85–93 23 90 88–93 87–93 25 52
53 88 85–92 84–92 21 90 88–93 87–93 25 53
54 88 85–92 84–92 21 89 87–92 86–92 23 54
86 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:8–2:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 78 75–82 74–83 7 80 78–83 77–83 9 71
72 78 75–82 74–83 7 80 78–83 77–83 9 72
73 77 74–81 73–82 6 79 77–82 76–82 8 73
74 77 74–81 73–82 6 79 77–82 76–82 8 74
75 76 73–80 72–81 5 78 76–81 75–81 7 75
NOT FOR
76 76 73–80 72–81 5 78 76–81 75–81 7 76
77 75 72–79 71–80 5 77 75–80 74–80 6 77
78 75 72–79 71–80 5 77 75–80 74–80 6 78
79 74 71–78 70–79 4 77 75–80 74–80 6 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 74 71–78 70–79 4 76 74–79 73–79 5 80
81 73 70–77 69–78 4 76 74–79 73–79 5 81
82 73 70–77 69–78 4 75 73–78 72–78 5 82
83 72 69–76 68–77 3 75 73–78 72–78 5 83
84 72 69–76 68–77 3 74 72–77 71–77 4 84
OR RESALE
85 72 69–76 68–77 3 74 72–77 71–77 4 85
86 71 68–75 68–76 3 73 71–76 70–76 4 86
87 71 68–75 68–76 3 73 71–76 70–76 4 87
88 70 67–74 67–75 2 72 70–75 69–75 3 88
89 70 67–74 67–75 2 72 70–75 69–75 3 89
90 69 66–73 66–74 2 71 69–74 68–74 3 90
91 69 66–73 66–74 2 71 69–74 68–74 3 91
92 68 65–72 65–73 2 70 68–73 67–73 2 92
93 68 65–72 65–73 2 70 68–73 67–73 2 93
94 67 64–71 64–72 1 69 67–72 66–72 2 94
95 67 64–71 64–72 1 69 67–72 66–72 2 95
96 67 64–71 64–72 1 68 66–71 65–71 2 96
97 66 63–70 63–71 1 68 66–71 65–71 2 97
98 66 63–70 63–71 1 67 65–70 64–70 1 98
99 66 63–70 63–71 1 67 65–70 64–70 1 99
100 65 62–69 62–70 1 66 64–69 63–69 1 100
101 65 62–69 62–70 1 66 64–69 63–69 1 101
102 64 61–68 61–69 1 65 63–68 62–68 1 102
103 64 61–68 61–69 1 65 63–68 62–68 1 103
104 64 61–68 61–69 1 64 62–67 61–67 1 104
105 63 60–67 60–68 1 64 62–67 61–67 1 105
106 63 60–67 60–68 1 63 61–66 60–66 1 106
107 63 60–67 60–68 1 63 61–66 60–66 1 107
108 62 59–66 59–67 1 62 60–65 59–65 1 108
109 62 59–66 59–67 1 62 60–65 59–65 1 109
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 87
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:8–2:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 55 52–59 52–60 0.1 54 52–57 52–57 0.1 126
127 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 54 52–57 52–57 0.1 127
128 54 52–58 51–59 0.1 53 51–56 51–56 0.1 128
129 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 53 51–56 51–56 0.1 129
130 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 52 50–55 50–55 0.1 130
NOT FOR
131 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 52 50–55 50–55 0.1 131
132 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 51 49–54 49–54 0.1 132
133 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 51 49–54 49–54 0.1 133
134 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 50 48–53 48–53 <0.1 134
ADMINISTRATION
135 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 50 48–53 48–53 <0.1 135
136 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 49 47–52 47–52 <0.1 136
137 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 49 47–52 47–52 <0.1 137
138 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 48 46–51 46–51 <0.1 138
139 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 48 46–51 46–51 <0.1 139
OR RESALE
140 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 47 45–50 45–50 <0.1 140
141 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 47 45–50 45–50 <0.1 141
142 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 46 44–49 44–49 <0.1 142
143 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 46 44–49 44–49 <0.1 143
144 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 45 43–48 43–48 <0.1 144
145 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 45 43–48 43–48 <0.1 145
146 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 44 42–47 42–47 <0.1 146
147 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 44 42–47 42–47 <0.1 147
148 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 43 41–46 41–46 <0.1 148
149 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 43 41–46 41–46 <0.1 149
150 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 42 40–45 40–45 <0.1 150
151 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 42 40–45 40–45 <0.1 151
152 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 41 39–44 39–45 <0.1 152
153 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 41 39–44 39–45 <0.1 153
154–160 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 40 38–43 38–44 <0.1 154–160
88 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:10–2:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 110 106–113 106–114 75 109 106–111 106–112 73 16
17 109 105–112 105–113 73 108 105–110 105–111 70 17
18 108 104–111 104–112 70 108 105–110 105–111 70 18
19 107 103–110 103–111 68 107 104–109 104–110 68 19
20 106 102–109 102–110 66 107 104–109 104–110 68 20
NOT FOR
21 105 101–108 101–109 63 106 103–108 103–109 66 21
22 104 101–107 100–108 61 105 103–107 102–108 63 22
23 103 100–106 99–107 58 105 103–107 102–108 63 23
24 102 99–105 98–106 55 104 102–106 101–107 61 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 102 99–105 98–106 55 104 102–106 101–107 61 25
26 101 98–104 97–105 53 103 101–105 100–106 58 26
27 101 98–104 97–105 53 103 101–105 100–106 58 27
28 100 97–103 96–104 50 102 100–104 99–105 55 28
29 99 96–102 95–103 47 102 100–104 99–105 55 29
OR RESALE
30 98 95–101 94–102 45 101 99–103 98–104 53 30
31 98 95–101 94–102 45 101 99–103 98–104 53 31
32 97 94–100 93–101 42 100 98–102 97–103 50 32
33 97 94–100 93–101 42 99 97–101 96–102 47 33
34 96 93–99 92–100 39 99 97–101 96–102 47 34
35 96 93–99 92–100 39 98 96–100 95–101 45 35
36 95 92–99 91–99 37 98 96–100 95–101 45 36
37 94 91–98 90–98 34 97 95–99 94–100 42 37
38 94 91–98 90–98 34 97 95–99 94–100 42 38
39 93 90–97 89–97 32 96 94–98 93–99 39 39
40 93 90–97 89–97 32 96 94–98 93–99 39 40
41 92 89–96 88–96 30 95 93–97 92–98 37 41
42 92 89–96 88–96 30 94 92–97 91–97 34 42
43 91 88–95 87–95 27 94 92–97 91–97 34 43
44 91 88–95 87–95 27 93 91–96 90–96 32 44
45 90 87–94 86–94 25 93 91–96 90–96 32 45
46 90 87–94 86–94 25 92 90–95 89–95 30 46
47 89 86–93 85–93 23 92 90–95 89–95 30 47
48 89 86–93 85–93 23 91 89–94 88–94 27 48
49 88 85–92 84–92 21 91 89–94 88–94 27 49
50 88 85–92 84–92 21 90 88–93 87–93 25 50
51 87 84–91 83–91 19 90 88–93 87–93 25 51
52 87 84–91 83–91 19 89 87–92 86–92 23 52
53 86 83–90 82–90 18 89 87–92 86–92 23 53
54 86 83–90 82–90 18 88 86–91 85–91 21 54
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 89
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:10–2:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 77 74–81 73–82 6 79 77–82 76–82 8 71
72 76 73–80 72–81 5 79 77–82 76–82 8 72
73 76 73–80 72–81 5 78 76–81 75–81 7 73
74 75 72–79 71–80 5 78 76–81 75–81 7 74
75 75 72–79 71–80 5 77 75–80 74–80 6 75
NOT FOR
76 74 71–78 70–79 4 77 75–80 74–80 6 76
77 74 71–78 70–79 4 77 75–80 74–80 6 77
78 73 70–77 69–78 4 76 74–79 73–79 5 78
79 73 70–77 69–78 4 76 74–79 73–79 5 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 72 69–76 68–77 3 75 73–78 72–78 5 80
81 72 69–76 68–77 3 75 73–78 72–78 5 81
82 71 68–75 68–76 3 74 72–77 71–77 4 82
83 71 68–75 68–76 3 74 72–77 71–77 4 83
84 70 67–74 67–75 2 73 71–76 70–76 4 84
OR RESALE
85 70 67–74 67–75 2 73 71–76 70–76 4 85
86 69 66–73 66–74 2 72 70–75 69–75 3 86
87 69 66–73 66–74 2 72 70–75 69–75 3 87
88 69 66–73 66–74 2 71 69–74 68–74 3 88
89 68 65–72 65–73 2 71 69–74 68–74 3 89
90 68 65–72 65–73 2 70 68–73 67–73 2 90
91 68 65–72 65–73 2 70 68–73 67–73 2 91
92 67 64–71 64–72 1 69 67–72 66–72 2 92
93 67 64–71 64–72 1 69 67–72 66–72 2 93
94 67 64–71 64–72 1 68 66–71 65–71 2 94
95 66 63–70 63–71 1 68 66–71 65–71 2 95
96 66 63–70 63–71 1 67 65–70 64–70 1 96
97 66 63–70 63–71 1 67 65–70 64–70 1 97
98 65 62–69 62–70 1 66 64–69 63–69 1 98
99 65 62–69 62–70 1 66 64–69 63–69 1 99
100 64 61–68 61–69 1 65 63–68 62–68 1 100
101 64 61–68 61–69 1 65 63–68 62–68 1 101
102 64 61–68 61–69 1 64 62–67 61–67 1 102
103 63 60–67 60–68 1 64 62–67 61–67 1 103
104 63 60–67 60–68 1 63 61–66 60–66 1 104
105 63 60–67 60–68 1 63 61–66 60–66 1 105
106 62 59–66 59–67 1 62 60–65 59–65 1 106
107 62 59–66 59–67 1 62 60–65 59–65 1 107
108 62 59–66 59–67 1 62 60–65 59–65 1 108
109 61 58–65 58–66 0.5 61 59–64 58–64 0.5 109
90 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 2:10–2:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 53 51–56 51–56 0.1 126
127 53 51–57 50–58 0.1 52 50–55 50–55 0.1 127
128 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 52 50–55 50–55 0.1 128
129 52 50–56 49–57 0.1 51 49–54 49–54 0.1 129
130 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 51 49–54 49–54 0.1 130
NOT FOR
131 51 49–55 48–56 0.1 50 48–53 48–53 <0.1 131
132 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 50 48–53 48–53 <0.1 132
133 50 48–54 47–55 <0.1 49 47–52 47–52 <0.1 133
134 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 49 47–52 47–52 <0.1 134
ADMINISTRATION
135 49 47–53 46–54 <0.1 48 46–51 46–51 <0.1 135
136 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 48 46–51 46–51 <0.1 136
137 48 46–52 45–53 <0.1 47 45–50 45–50 <0.1 137
138 47 45–51 44–52 <0.1 47 45–50 45–50 <0.1 138
139 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 46 44–49 44–49 <0.1 139
OR RESALE
140 46 44–50 43–51 <0.1 46 44–49 44–49 <0.1 140
141 45 43–50 42–50 <0.1 45 43–48 43–48 <0.1 141
142 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 45 43–48 43–48 <0.1 142
143 44 42–49 41–49 <0.1 44 42–47 42–47 <0.1 143
144 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 44 42–47 42–47 <0.1 144
145 43 41–48 40–48 <0.1 43 41–46 41–46 <0.1 145
146 42 40–47 39–47 <0.1 43 41–46 41–46 <0.1 146
147 41 39–46 38–46 <0.1 42 40–45 40–45 <0.1 147
148 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 42 40–45 40–45 <0.1 148
149 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 41 39–44 39–45 <0.1 149
150 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 41 39–44 39–45 <0.1 150
151–160 40 38–45 37–45 <0.1 40 38–43 38–44 <0.1 151
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 91
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:0–3:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 109 105–113 104–114 73 108 101–114 99–115 70 16
17 108 104–112 103–113 70 107 100–113 98–114 68 17
18 107 103–111 102–112 68 106 99–112 97–113 66 18
19 106 102–110 101–111 66 106 99–112 97–113 66 19
20 106 102–110 101–111 66 105 98–111 97–113 63 20
NOT FOR
21 105 101–109 100–110 63 105 98–111 97–113 63 21
22 104 100–108 99–109 61 104 97–110 96–112 61 22
23 103 99–107 98–108 58 104 97–110 96–112 61 23
24 102 98–106 97–107 55 103 96–109 95–111 58 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 101 97–105 96–106 53 103 96–109 95–111 58 25
26 100 96–104 95–105 50 102 95–109 94–110 55 26
27 99 95–103 94–104 47 102 95–109 94–110 55 27
28 98 94–102 93–103 45 101 94–108 93–109 53 28
29 97 93–101 92–102 42 101 94–108 93–109 53 29
OR RESALE
30 97 93–101 92–102 42 100 93–107 92–108 50 30
31 96 92–100 91–101 39 100 93–107 92–108 50 31
32 95 91–99 90–100 37 99 92–106 91–107 47 32
33 95 91–99 90–100 37 98 91–105 90–106 45 33
34 94 90–98 89–99 34 98 91–105 90–106 45 34
35 94 90–98 89–99 34 97 91–104 89–105 42 35
36 93 89–97 88–98 32 97 91–104 89–105 42 36
37 93 89–97 88–98 32 96 90–103 88–104 39 37
38 93 89–97 88–98 32 96 90–103 88–104 39 38
39 92 88–96 87–97 30 95 89–102 87–103 37 39
40 92 88–96 87–97 30 94 88–101 87–103 34 40
41 91 87–95 86–96 27 94 88–101 87–103 34 41
42 91 87–95 86–96 27 93 87–100 86–102 32 42
43 90 86–94 85–95 25 93 87–100 86–102 32 43
44 90 86–94 85–95 25 92 86–99 85–101 30 44
45 89 85–93 84–94 23 92 86–99 85–101 30 45
46 89 85–93 84–94 23 91 85–99 84–100 27 46
47 88 84–93 83–93 21 91 85–99 84–100 27 47
48 88 84–93 83–93 21 90 84–98 83–99 25 48
49 87 83–92 82–92 19 90 84–98 83–99 25 49
50 87 83–92 82–92 19 89 83–97 82–98 23 50
51 86 82–91 81–91 18 89 83–97 82–98 23 51
52 86 82–91 81–91 18 88 82–96 81–97 21 52
53 85 81–90 81–90 16 87 81–95 80–96 19 53
54 85 81–90 81–90 16 87 81–95 80–96 19 54
92 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:0–3:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 76 73–81 72–82 5 78 73–87 72–88 7 71
72 75 72–80 71–81 5 78 73–87 72–88 7 72
73 75 72–80 71–81 5 77 72–86 71–87 6 73
74 74 71–79 70–80 4 77 72–86 71–87 6 74
75 74 71–79 70–80 4 76 71–85 70–86 5 75
NOT FOR
76 73 70–78 69–79 4 76 71–85 70–86 5 76
77 73 70–78 69–79 4 76 71–85 70–86 5 77
78 72 69–77 68–78 3 75 71–84 69–85 5 78
79 72 69–77 68–78 3 75 71–84 69–85 5 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 71 68–76 67–77 3 74 70–83 68–84 4 80
81 71 68–76 67–77 3 74 70–83 68–84 4 81
82 70 67–75 66–76 2 73 69–82 67–83 4 82
83 70 67–75 66–76 2 73 69–82 67–83 4 83
84 69 66–74 65–75 2 72 68–81 66–83 3 84
OR RESALE
85 69 66–74 65–75 2 72 68–81 66–83 3 85
86 69 66–74 65–75 2 71 67–80 66–82 3 86
87 68 65–73 64–74 2 71 67–80 66–82 3 87
88 68 65–73 64–74 2 70 66–79 65–81 2 88
89 68 65–73 64–74 2 70 66–79 65–81 2 89
90 67 64–72 63–73 1 70 66–79 65–81 2 90
91 67 64–72 63–73 1 69 65–79 64–80 2 91
92 67 64–72 63–73 1 68 64–78 63–79 2 92
93 66 63–71 62–72 1 68 64–78 63–79 2 93
94 66 63–71 62–72 1 68 64–78 63–79 2 94
95 66 63–71 62–72 1 67 63–77 62–78 1 95
96 65 62–70 61–71 1 67 63–77 62–78 1 96
97 65 62–70 61–71 1 66 62–76 61–77 1 97
98 64 61–69 60–70 1 66 62–76 61–77 1 98
99 64 61–69 60–70 1 65 61–75 60–76 1 99
100 64 61–69 60–70 1 65 61–75 60–76 1 100
101 63 60–68 59–69 1 64 61–74 59–75 1 101
102 63 60–68 59–69 1 64 61–74 59–75 1 102
103 63 60–68 59–69 1 63 60–73 58–74 1 103
104 62 59–67 58–68 1 63 60–73 58–74 1 104
105 62 59–67 58–68 1 62 59–72 57–73 1 105
106 62 59–67 58–68 1 62 59–72 57–73 1 106
107 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 61 58–71 56–73 0.5 107
108 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 61 58–71 56–73 0.5 108
109 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 61 58–71 56–73 0.5 109
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 93
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:0–3:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 52 49–58 49–58 0.1 52 50–63 48–64 0.1 126
127 51 48–57 48–57 0.1 52 50–63 48–64 0.1 127
128 51 48–57 48–57 0.1 51 49–62 47–63 0.1 128
129 50 47–56 47–56 <0.1 51 49–62 47–63 0.1 129
130 50 47–56 47–56 <0.1 50 48–61 46–63 <0.1 130
NOT FOR
131 49 46–55 46–55 <0.1 50 48–61 46–63 <0.1 131
132 48 45–54 45–54 <0.1 49 47–60 46–62 <0.1 132
133 48 45–54 45–54 <0.1 49 47–60 46–62 <0.1 133
134 47 44–53 44–54 <0.1 48 46–59 45–61 <0.1 134
ADMINISTRATION
135 47 44–53 44–54 <0.1 48 46–59 45–61 <0.1 135
136 46 43–52 43–53 <0.1 47 45–59 44–60 <0.1 136
137 46 43–52 43–53 <0.1 47 45–59 44–60 <0.1 137
138 45 43–51 42–52 <0.1 46 44–58 43–59 <0.1 138
139 44 42–50 41–51 <0.1 46 44–58 43–59 <0.1 139
OR RESALE
140 43 41–49 40–50 <0.1 45 43–57 42–58 <0.1 140
141 43 41–49 40–50 <0.1 45 43–57 42–58 <0.1 141
142 42 40–48 39–49 <0.1 44 42–56 41–57 <0.1 142
143 41 39–47 38–48 <0.1 44 42–56 41–57 <0.1 143
144 41 39–47 38–48 <0.1 43 41–55 40–56 <0.1 144
145 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 43 41–55 40–56 <0.1 145
146 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 42 40–54 39–55 <0.1 146
147 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 42 40–54 39–55 <0.1 147
148 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 41 40–53 38–54 <0.1 148
149 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 41 40–53 38–54 <0.1 149
150–160 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 40 39–52 37–53 <0.1 150–160
94 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:2–3:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 107 103–111 102–112 68 107 100–113 98–114 68 16
17 106 102–110 101–111 66 106 99–112 97–113 66 17
18 105 101–109 100–110 63 105 98–111 97–113 63 18
19 104 100–108 99–109 61 105 98–111 97–113 63 19
20 103 99–107 98–108 58 104 97–110 96–112 61 20
NOT FOR
21 102 98–106 97–107 55 103 96–109 95–111 58 21
22 102 98–106 97–107 55 103 96–109 95–111 58 22
23 101 97–105 96–106 53 102 95–109 94–110 55 23
24 100 96–104 95–105 50 102 95–109 94–110 55 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 100 96–104 95–105 50 101 94–108 93–109 53 25
26 99 95–103 94–104 47 101 94–108 93–109 53 26
27 98 94–102 93–103 45 100 93–107 92–108 50 27
28 97 93–101 92–102 42 100 93–107 92–108 50 28
29 97 93–101 92–102 42 99 92–106 91–107 47 29
OR RESALE
30 96 92–100 91–101 39 99 92–106 91–107 47 30
31 95 91–99 90–100 37 98 91–105 90–106 45 31
32 95 91–99 90–100 37 98 91–105 90–106 45 32
33 94 90–98 89–99 34 97 91–104 89–105 42 33
34 94 90–98 89–99 34 97 91–104 89–105 42 34
35 93 89–97 88–98 32 96 90–103 88–104 39 35
36 93 89–97 88–98 32 96 90–103 88–104 39 36
37 93 89–97 88–98 32 95 89–102 87–103 37 37
38 92 88–96 87–97 30 94 88–101 87–103 34 38
39 92 88–96 87–97 30 94 88–101 87–103 34 39
40 91 87–95 86–96 27 93 87–100 86–102 32 40
41 91 87–95 86–96 27 93 87–100 86–102 32 41
42 90 86–94 85–95 25 92 86–99 85–101 30 42
43 90 86–94 85–95 25 92 86–99 85–101 30 43
44 89 85–93 84–94 23 91 85–99 84–100 27 44
45 88 84–93 83–93 21 91 85–99 84–100 27 45
46 88 84–93 83–93 21 90 84–98 83–99 25 46
47 87 83–92 82–92 19 90 84–98 83–99 25 47
48 86 82–91 81–91 18 89 83–97 82–98 23 48
49 86 82–91 81–91 18 89 83–97 82–98 23 49
50 85 81–90 81–90 16 88 82–96 81–97 21 50
51 84 80–89 80–89 14 88 82–96 81–97 21 51
52 84 80–89 80–89 14 87 81–95 80–96 19 52
53 83 79–88 79–88 13 87 81–95 80–96 19 53
54 83 79–88 79–88 13 86 81–94 79–95 18 54
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 95
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:2–3:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 74 71–79 70–80 4 77 72–86 71–87 6 71
72 74 71–79 70–80 4 77 72–86 71–87 6 72
73 73 70–78 69–79 4 76 71–85 70–86 5 73
74 73 70–78 69–79 4 76 71–85 70–86 5 74
75 72 69–77 68–78 3 75 71–84 69–85 5 75
NOT FOR
76 72 69–77 68–78 3 75 71–84 69–85 5 76
77 71 68–76 67–77 3 75 71–84 69–85 5 77
78 71 68–76 67–77 3 74 70–83 68–84 4 78
79 70 67–75 66–76 2 74 70–83 68–84 4 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 70 67–75 66–76 2 73 69–82 67–83 4 80
81 69 66–74 65–75 2 73 69–82 67–83 4 81
82 69 66–74 65–75 2 72 68–81 66–83 3 82
83 68 65–73 64–74 2 72 68–81 66–83 3 83
84 68 65–73 64–74 2 71 67–80 66–82 3 84
OR RESALE
85 68 65–73 64–74 2 71 67–80 66–82 3 85
86 67 64–72 63–73 1 70 66–79 65–81 2 86
87 67 64–72 63–73 1 70 66–79 65–81 2 87
88 67 64–72 63–73 1 69 65–79 64–80 2 88
89 66 63–71 62–72 1 69 65–79 64–80 2 89
90 66 63–71 62–72 1 68 64–78 63–79 2 90
91 66 63–71 62–72 1 68 64–78 63–79 2 91
92 65 62–70 61–71 1 67 63–77 62–78 1 92
93 65 62–70 61–71 1 67 63–77 62–78 1 93
94 65 62–70 61–71 1 66 62–76 61–77 1 94
95 64 61–69 60–70 1 66 62–76 61–77 1 95
96 64 61–69 60–70 1 65 61–75 60–76 1 96
97 64 61–69 60–70 1 65 61–75 60–76 1 97
98 63 60–68 59–69 1 64 61–74 59–75 1 98
99 63 60–68 59–69 1 64 61–74 59–75 1 99
100 62 59–67 58–68 1 63 60–73 58–74 1 100
101 62 59–67 58–68 1 63 60–73 58–74 1 101
102 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 62 59–72 57–73 1 102
103 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 62 59–72 57–73 1 103
104 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 61 58–71 56–73 0.5 104
105 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 61 58–71 56–73 0.5 105
106 59 56–64 55–65 0.3 60 57–70 56–72 0.4 106
107 59 56–64 55–65 0.3 60 57–70 56–72 0.4 107
108 58 55–63 54–64 0.3 60 57–70 56–72 0.4 108
109 58 55–63 54–64 0.3 59 56–69 55–71 0.3 109
96 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:2–3:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 49 46–55 46–55 <0.1 51 49–62 47–63 0.1 126
127 48 45–54 45–54 <0.1 50 48–61 46–63 <0.1 127
128 48 45–54 45–54 <0.1 50 48–61 46–63 <0.1 128
129 47 44–53 44–54 <0.1 49 47–60 46–62 <0.1 129
130 47 44–53 44–54 <0.1 49 47–60 46–62 <0.1 130
NOT FOR
131 46 43–52 43–53 <0.1 48 46–59 45–61 <0.1 131
132 45 43–51 42–52 <0.1 48 46–59 45–61 <0.1 132
133 45 43–51 42–52 <0.1 47 45–59 44–60 <0.1 133
134 44 42–50 41–51 <0.1 47 45–59 44–60 <0.1 134
ADMINISTRATION
135 44 42–50 41–51 <0.1 46 44–58 43–59 <0.1 135
136 43 41–49 40–50 <0.1 46 44–58 43–59 <0.1 136
137 43 41–49 40–50 <0.1 45 43–57 42–58 <0.1 137
138 42 40–48 39–49 <0.1 45 43–57 42–58 <0.1 138
139 42 40–48 39–49 <0.1 44 42–56 41–57 <0.1 139
OR RESALE
140 41 39–47 38–48 <0.1 44 42–56 41–57 <0.1 140
141 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 43 41–55 40–56 <0.1 141
142 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 43 41–55 40–56 <0.1 142
143 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 42 40–54 39–55 <0.1 143
144 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 42 40–54 39–55 <0.1 144
145 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 41 40–53 38–54 <0.1 145
146–160 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 40 39–52 37–53 <0.1 146–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 97
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:4–3:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 105 101–109 100–110 63 105 98–111 97–113 63 16
17 104 100–108 99–109 61 105 98–111 97–113 63 17
18 103 99–107 98–108 58 104 97–110 96–112 61 18
19 103 99–107 98–108 58 104 97–110 96–112 61 19
20 102 98–106 97–107 55 103 96–109 95–111 58 20
NOT FOR
21 101 97–105 96–106 53 102 95–109 94–110 55 21
22 101 97–105 96–106 53 102 95–109 94–110 55 22
23 100 96–104 95–105 50 101 94–108 93–109 53 23
24 99 95–103 94–104 47 101 94–108 93–109 53 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 98 94–102 93–103 45 100 93–107 92–108 50 25
26 97 93–101 92–102 42 100 93–107 92–108 50 26
27 97 93–101 92–102 42 99 92–106 91–107 47 27
28 96 92–100 91–101 39 99 92–106 91–107 47 28
29 96 92–100 91–101 39 98 91–105 90–106 45 29
OR RESALE
30 95 91–99 90–100 37 98 91–105 90–106 45 30
31 94 90–98 89–99 34 97 91–104 89–105 42 31
32 94 90–98 89–99 34 97 91–104 89–105 42 32
33 93 89–97 88–98 32 96 90–103 88–104 39 33
34 93 89–97 88–98 32 96 90–103 88–104 39 34
35 93 89–97 88–98 32 95 89–102 87–103 37 35
36 92 88–96 87–97 30 94 88–101 87–103 34 36
37 92 88–96 87–97 30 94 88–101 87–103 34 37
38 91 87–95 86–96 27 93 87–100 86–102 32 38
39 91 87–95 86–96 27 93 87–100 86–102 32 39
40 90 86–94 85–95 25 92 86–99 85–101 30 40
41 90 86–94 85–95 25 92 86–99 85–101 30 41
42 89 85–93 84–94 23 91 85–99 84–100 27 42
43 89 85–93 84–94 23 91 85–99 84–100 27 43
44 88 84–93 83–93 21 90 84–98 83–99 25 44
45 87 83–92 82–92 19 89 83–97 82–98 23 45
46 87 83–92 82–92 19 89 83–97 82–98 23 46
47 86 82–91 81–91 18 88 82–96 81–97 21 47
48 85 81–90 81–90 16 88 82–96 81–97 21 48
49 85 81–90 81–90 16 87 81–95 80–96 19 49
50 84 80–89 80–89 14 87 81–95 80–96 19 50
51 83 79–88 79–88 13 86 81–94 79–95 18 51
52 83 79–88 79–88 13 85 80–93 78–94 16 52
53 82 78–87 78–87 12 85 80–93 78–94 16 53
54 82 78–87 78–87 12 84 79–92 77–93 14 54
98 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:4–3:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 73 70–78 69–79 4 76 71–85 70–86 5 71
72 72 69–77 68–78 3 75 71–84 69–85 5 72
73 72 69–77 68–78 3 75 71–84 69–85 5 73
74 71 68–76 67–77 3 74 70–83 68–84 4 74
75 71 68–76 67–77 3 74 70–83 68–84 4 75
NOT FOR
76 70 67–75 66–76 2 74 70–83 68–84 4 76
77 70 67–75 66–76 2 73 69–82 67–83 4 77
78 69 66–74 65–75 2 73 69–82 67–83 4 78
79 69 66–74 65–75 2 72 68–81 66–83 3 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 69 66–74 65–75 2 72 68–81 66–83 3 80
81 68 65–73 64–74 2 71 67–80 66–82 3 81
82 68 65–73 64–74 2 71 67–80 66–82 3 82
83 67 64–72 63–73 1 70 66–79 65–81 2 83
84 67 64–72 63–73 1 70 66–79 65–81 2 84
OR RESALE
85 67 64–72 63–73 1 69 65–79 64–80 2 85
86 66 63–71 62–72 1 69 65–79 64–80 2 86
87 66 63–71 62–72 1 68 64–78 63–79 2 87
88 66 63–71 62–72 1 68 64–78 63–79 2 88
89 65 62–70 61–71 1 67 63–77 62–78 1 89
90 65 62–70 61–71 1 67 63–77 62–78 1 90
91 65 62–70 61–71 1 66 62–76 61–77 1 91
92 64 61–69 60–70 1 66 62–76 61–77 1 92
93 64 61–69 60–70 1 65 61–75 60–76 1 93
94 64 61–69 60–70 1 65 61–75 60–76 1 94
95 63 60–68 59–69 1 64 61–74 59–75 1 95
96 63 60–68 59–69 1 64 61–74 59–75 1 96
97 62 59–67 58–68 1 63 60–73 58–74 1 97
98 62 59–67 58–68 1 63 60–73 58–74 1 98
99 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 62 59–72 57–73 1 99
100 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 62 59–72 57–73 1 100
101 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 61 58–71 56–73 0.5 101
102 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 61 58–71 56–73 0.5 102
103 59 56–64 55–65 0.3 61 58–71 56–73 0.5 103
104 59 56–64 55–65 0.3 60 57–70 56–72 0.4 104
105 58 55–63 54–64 0.3 60 57–70 56–72 0.4 105
106 58 55–63 54–64 0.3 59 56–69 55–71 0.3 106
107 57 54–62 53–63 0.2 59 56–69 55–71 0.3 107
108 57 54–62 53–63 0.2 58 55–69 54–70 0.3 108
109 56 53–61 52–62 0.2 58 55–69 54–70 0.3 109
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 99
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:4–3:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 46 43–52 43–53 <0.1 49 47–60 46–62 <0.1 126
127 45 43–51 42–52 <0.1 48 46–59 45–61 <0.1 127
128 45 43–51 42–52 <0.1 48 46–59 45–61 <0.1 128
129 44 42–50 41–51 <0.1 47 45–59 44–60 <0.1 129
130 43 41–49 40–50 <0.1 47 45–59 44–60 <0.1 130
NOT FOR
131 43 41–49 40–50 <0.1 46 44–58 43–59 <0.1 131
132 42 40–48 39–49 <0.1 46 44–58 43–59 <0.1 132
133 42 40–48 39–49 <0.1 45 43–57 42–58 <0.1 133
134 41 39–47 38–48 <0.1 45 43–57 42–58 <0.1 134
ADMINISTRATION
135 41 39–47 38–48 <0.1 44 42–56 41–57 <0.1 135
136 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 44 42–56 41–57 <0.1 136
137 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 43 41–55 40–56 <0.1 137
138 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 42 40–54 39–55 <0.1 138
139 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 42 40–54 39–55 <0.1 139
OR RESALE
140 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 41 40–53 38–54 <0.1 140
141 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 41 40–53 38–54 <0.1 141
142–160 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 40 39–52 37–53 <0.1 142–160
100 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:6–3:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 104 98–109 97–111 61 104 99–109 98–109 61 16
17 103 97–109 96–110 58 104 99–109 98–109 61 17
18 102 96–108 95–109 55 103 98–108 97–109 58 18
19 101 95–107 94–108 53 102 97–107 96–108 55 19
20 100 94–106 93–107 50 102 97–107 96–108 55 20
NOT FOR
21 99 93–105 92–106 47 101 96–106 95–107 53 21
22 98 92–104 91–105 45 101 96–106 95–107 53 22
23 98 92–104 91–105 45 100 95–105 94–106 50 23
24 97 91–103 90–104 42 99 94–104 93–105 47 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 97 91–103 90–104 42 99 94–104 93–105 47 25
26 96 91–102 89–103 39 98 93–103 92–104 45 26
27 96 91–102 89–103 39 97 92–102 91–103 42 27
28 95 90–101 89–102 37 97 92–102 91–103 42 28
29 95 90–101 89–102 37 96 91–101 91–102 39 29
OR RESALE
30 94 89–100 88–101 34 96 91–101 91–102 39 30
31 94 89–100 88–101 34 95 90–100 90–101 37 31
32 93 88–99 87–100 32 95 90–100 90–101 37 32
33 93 88–99 87–100 32 94 90–99 89–100 34 33
34 93 88–99 87–100 32 94 90–99 89–100 34 34
35 92 87–98 86–99 30 93 89–98 88–99 32 35
36 92 87–98 86–99 30 93 89–98 88–99 32 36
37 92 87–98 86–99 30 92 88–97 87–98 30 37
38 91 86–97 85–98 27 92 88–97 87–98 30 38
39 90 85–96 84–97 25 91 87–96 86–97 27 39
40 89 84–95 83–96 23 91 87–96 86–97 27 40
41 89 84–95 83–96 23 90 86–95 85–96 25 41
42 88 83–94 82–95 21 90 86–95 85–96 25 42
43 88 83–94 82–95 21 89 85–94 84–95 23 43
44 87 82–93 81–95 19 88 84–93 83–94 21 44
45 86 81–93 80–94 18 88 84–93 83–94 21 45
46 86 81–93 80–94 18 87 83–92 82–93 19 46
47 85 80–92 79–93 16 87 83–92 82–93 19 47
48 84 79–91 78–92 14 86 82–91 81–92 18 48
49 83 78–90 77–91 13 86 82–91 81–92 18 49
50 83 78–90 77–91 13 85 81–90 80–91 16 50
51 82 77–89 76–90 12 85 81–90 80–91 16 51
52 82 77–89 76–90 12 84 80–89 79–90 14 52
53 81 76–88 75–89 10 83 79–88 78–89 13 53
54 81 76–88 75–89 10 83 79–88 78–89 13 54
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 101
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:6–3:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 72 68–79 67–80 3 75 71–81 70–82 5 71
72 71 67–78 66–80 3 75 71–81 70–82 5 72
73 71 67–78 66–80 3 74 70–80 69–81 4 73
74 70 66–77 65–79 2 74 70–80 69–81 4 74
75 70 66–77 65–79 2 73 69–79 68–80 4 75
NOT FOR
76 69 65–77 64–78 2 73 69–79 68–80 4 76
77 69 65–77 64–78 2 72 68–78 67–79 3 77
78 68 64–76 63–77 2 72 68–78 67–79 3 78
79 68 64–76 63–77 2 71 67–77 67–78 3 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 68 64–76 63–77 2 71 67–77 67–78 3 80
81 67 63–75 62–76 1 70 66–76 66–77 2 81
82 67 63–75 62–76 1 70 66–76 66–77 2 82
83 67 63–75 62–76 1 69 66–75 65–76 2 83
84 66 62–74 61–75 1 69 66–75 65–76 2 84
OR RESALE
85 66 62–74 61–75 1 68 65–74 64–75 2 85
86 65 61–73 60–74 1 68 65–74 64–75 2 86
87 65 61–73 60–74 1 67 64–73 63–74 1 87
88 65 61–73 60–74 1 67 64–73 63–74 1 88
89 64 60–72 59–73 1 66 63–72 62–73 1 89
90 64 60–72 59–73 1 66 63–72 62–73 1 90
91 63 60–71 58–72 1 65 62–71 61–72 1 91
92 63 60–71 58–72 1 65 62–71 61–72 1 92
93 63 60–71 58–72 1 64 61–70 60–71 1 93
94 62 59–70 58–71 1 64 61–70 60–71 1 94
95 62 59–70 58–71 1 63 60–69 59–70 1 95
96 61 58–69 57–70 0.5 63 60–69 59–70 1 96
97 61 58–69 57–70 0.5 62 59–68 58–69 1 97
98 60 57–68 56–69 0.4 62 59–68 58–69 1 98
99 60 57–68 56–69 0.4 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 99
100 59 56–67 55–68 0.3 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 100
101 59 56–67 55–68 0.3 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 101
102 58 55–66 54–67 0.3 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 102
103 58 55–66 54–67 0.3 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 103
104 57 54–65 53–66 0.2 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 104
105 57 54–65 53–66 0.2 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 105
106 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 106
107 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 107
108 55 52–63 51–64 0.1 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 108
109 55 52–63 51–64 0.1 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 109
102 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:6–3:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 44 42–53 41–54 <0.1 48 45–55 44–56 <0.1 126
127 43 41–52 40–53 <0.1 47 44–54 43–55 <0.1 127
128 42 40–51 39–52 <0.1 47 44–54 43–55 <0.1 128
129 42 40–51 39–52 <0.1 46 43–53 43–54 <0.1 129
130 41 39–50 38–51 <0.1 45 42–52 42–53 <0.1 130
NOT FOR
131 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 45 42–52 42–53 <0.1 131
132 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 132
133 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 133
134 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 43 41–50 40–51 <0.1 134
ADMINISTRATION
135 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 135
136 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 41 39–48 38–49 <0.1 136
137–160 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 137–160
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 103
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:8–3:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 103 97–109 96–110 58 103 98–108 97–109 58 16
17 102 96–108 95–109 55 103 98–108 97–109 58 17
18 101 95–107 94–108 53 102 97–107 96–108 55 18
19 100 94–106 93–107 50 102 97–107 96–108 55 19
20 99 93–105 92–106 47 101 96–106 95–107 53 20
NOT FOR
21 98 92–104 91–105 45 100 95–105 94–106 50 21
22 97 91–103 90–104 42 100 95–105 94–106 50 22
23 96 91–102 89–103 39 99 94–104 93–105 47 23
24 96 91–102 89–103 39 98 93–103 92–104 45 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 95 90–101 89–102 37 97 92–102 91–103 42 25
26 95 90–101 89–102 37 97 92–102 91–103 42 26
27 95 90–101 89–102 37 96 91–101 91–102 39 27
28 94 89–100 88–101 34 96 91–101 91–102 39 28
29 93 88–99 87–100 32 95 90–100 90–101 37 29
OR RESALE
30 93 88–99 87–100 32 95 90–100 90–101 37 30
31 92 87–98 86–99 30 94 90–99 89–100 34 31
32 92 87–98 86–99 30 94 90–99 89–100 34 32
33 91 86–97 85–98 27 93 89–98 88–99 32 33
34 91 86–97 85–98 27 93 89–98 88–99 32 34
35 90 85–96 84–97 25 92 88–97 87–98 30 35
36 90 85–96 84–97 25 91 87–96 86–97 27 36
37 90 85–96 84–97 25 91 87–96 86–97 27 37
38 89 84–95 83–96 23 90 86–95 85–96 25 38
39 88 83–94 82–95 21 89 85–94 84–95 23 39
40 88 83–94 82–95 21 89 85–94 84–95 23 40
41 87 82–93 81–95 19 88 84–93 83–94 21 41
42 87 82–93 81–95 19 88 84–93 83–94 21 42
43 86 81–93 80–94 18 87 83–92 82–93 19 43
44 86 81–93 80–94 18 86 82–91 81–92 18 44
45 85 80–92 79–93 16 86 82–91 81–92 18 45
46 85 80–92 79–93 16 85 81–90 80–91 16 46
47 84 79–91 78–92 14 85 81–90 80–91 16 47
48 83 78–90 77–91 13 84 80–89 79–90 14 48
49 83 78–90 77–91 13 84 80–89 79–90 14 49
50 82 77–89 76–90 12 83 79–88 78–89 13 50
51 82 77–89 76–90 12 83 79–88 78–89 13 51
52 81 76–88 75–89 10 82 78–87 77–88 12 52
53 81 76–88 75–89 10 82 78–87 77–88 12 53
54 80 76–87 74–88 9 81 77–86 76–87 10 54
104 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:8–3:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 71 67–78 66–80 3 73 69–79 68–80 4 71
72 70 66–77 65–79 2 72 68–78 67–79 3 72
73 70 66–77 65–79 2 72 68–78 67–79 3 73
74 69 65–77 64–78 2 71 67–77 67–78 3 74
75 69 65–77 64–78 2 71 67–77 67–78 3 75
NOT FOR
76 68 64–76 63–77 2 70 66–76 66–77 2 76
77 68 64–76 63–77 2 70 66–76 66–77 2 77
78 67 63–75 62–76 1 69 66–75 65–76 2 78
79 67 63–75 62–76 1 69 66–75 65–76 2 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 67 63–75 62–76 1 68 65–74 64–75 2 80
81 66 62–74 61–75 1 68 65–74 64–75 2 81
82 66 62–74 61–75 1 67 64–73 63–74 1 82
83 65 61–73 60–74 1 67 64–73 63–74 1 83
84 65 61–73 60–74 1 66 63–72 62–73 1 84
OR RESALE
85 65 61–73 60–74 1 66 63–72 62–73 1 85
86 64 60–72 59–73 1 65 62–71 61–72 1 86
87 64 60–72 59–73 1 65 62–71 61–72 1 87
88 64 60–72 59–73 1 64 61–70 60–71 1 88
89 63 60–71 58–72 1 64 61–70 60–71 1 89
90 63 60–71 58–72 1 63 60–69 59–70 1 90
91 63 60–71 58–72 1 63 60–69 59–70 1 91
92 62 59–70 58–71 1 62 59–68 58–69 1 92
93 62 59–70 58–71 1 62 59–68 58–69 1 93
94 61 58–69 57–70 0.5 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 94
95 61 58–69 57–70 0.5 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 95
96 60 57–68 56–69 0.4 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 96
97 60 57–68 56–69 0.4 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 97
98 59 56–67 55–68 0.3 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 98
99 59 56–67 55–68 0.3 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 99
100 58 55–66 54–67 0.3 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 100
101 58 55–66 54–67 0.3 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 101
102 57 54–65 53–66 0.2 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 102
103 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 103
104 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 104
105 55 52–63 51–64 0.1 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 105
106 54 51–62 50–64 0.1 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 106
107 54 51–62 50–64 0.1 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 107
108 53 50–62 49–63 0.1 54 51–61 50–61 0.1 108
109 52 49–61 48–62 0.1 54 51–61 50–61 0.1 109
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 105
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:8–3:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
126 41 39–50 38–51 <0.1 45 42–52 42–53 <0.1 126
127 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 127
128 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 43 41–50 40–51 <0.1 128
129 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 129
130 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 41 39–48 38–49 <0.1 130
NOT FOR
131–160 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 131–160
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
106 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:10–3:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 101 95–107 94–108 53 102 97–107 96–108 55 16
17 100 94–106 93–107 50 102 97–107 96–108 55 17
18 99 93–105 92–106 47 101 96–106 95–107 53 18
19 98 92–104 91–105 45 101 96–106 95–107 53 19
20 97 91–103 90–104 42 100 95–105 94–106 50 20
NOT FOR
21 97 91–103 90–104 42 99 94–104 93–105 47 21
22 96 91–102 89–103 39 99 94–104 93–105 47 22
23 96 91–102 89–103 39 98 93–103 92–104 45 23
24 95 90–101 89–102 37 97 92–102 91–103 42 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 95 90–101 89–102 37 96 91–101 91–102 39 25
26 94 89–100 88–101 34 96 91–101 91–102 39 26
27 93 88–99 87–100 32 95 90–100 90–101 37 27
28 93 88–99 87–100 32 95 90–100 90–101 37 28
29 92 87–98 86–99 30 94 90–99 89–100 34 29
OR RESALE
30 92 87–98 86–99 30 94 90–99 89–100 34 30
31 91 86–97 85–98 27 93 89–98 88–99 32 31
32 91 86–97 85–98 27 93 89–98 88–99 32 32
33 90 85–96 84–97 25 92 88–97 87–98 30 33
34 90 85–96 84–97 25 91 87–96 86–97 27 34
35 89 84–95 83–96 23 90 86–95 85–96 25 35
36 89 84–95 83–96 23 90 86–95 85–96 25 36
37 88 83–94 82–95 21 89 85–94 84–95 23 37
38 88 83–94 82–95 21 88 84–93 83–94 21 38
39 87 82–93 81–95 19 87 83–92 82–93 19 39
40 87 82–93 81–95 19 87 83–92 82–93 19 40
41 86 81–93 80–94 18 86 82–91 81–92 18 41
42 85 80–92 79–93 16 86 82–91 81–92 18 42
43 85 80–92 79–93 16 85 81–90 80–91 16 43
44 84 79–91 78–92 14 84 80–89 79–90 14 44
45 83 78–90 77–91 13 84 80–89 79–90 14 45
46 83 78–90 77–91 13 83 79–88 78–89 13 46
47 82 77–89 76–90 12 83 79–88 78–89 13 47
48 82 77–89 76–90 12 82 78–87 77–88 12 48
49 81 76–88 75–89 10 82 78–87 77–88 12 49
50 81 76–88 75–89 10 81 77–86 76–87 10 50
51 80 76–87 74–88 9 81 77–86 76–87 10 51
52 79 75–86 73–87 8 80 76–86 75–86 9 52
53 79 75–86 73–87 8 80 76–86 75–86 9 53
54 78 74–85 73–86 7 79 75–85 74–85 8 54
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 107
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:10–3:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 69 65–77 64–78 2 70 66–76 66–77 2 71
72 69 65–77 64–78 2 69 66–75 65–76 2 72
73 68 64–76 63–77 2 69 66–75 65–76 2 73
74 68 64–76 63–77 2 68 65–74 64–75 2 74
75 67 63–75 62–76 1 68 65–74 64–75 2 75
NOT FOR
76 67 63–75 62–76 1 67 64–73 63–74 1 76
77 66 62–74 61–75 1 67 64–73 63–74 1 77
78 66 62–74 61–75 1 66 63–72 62–73 1 78
79 66 62–74 61–75 1 66 63–72 62–73 1 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 65 61–73 60–74 1 65 62–71 61–72 1 80
81 65 61–73 60–74 1 65 62–71 61–72 1 81
82 64 60–72 59–73 1 64 61–70 60–71 1 82
83 64 60–72 59–73 1 64 61–70 60–71 1 83
84 63 60–71 58–72 1 63 60–69 59–70 1 84
OR RESALE
85 63 60–71 58–72 1 63 60–69 59–70 1 85
86 63 60–71 58–72 1 62 59–68 58–69 1 86
87 62 59–70 58–71 1 62 59–68 58–69 1 87
88 62 59–70 58–71 1 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 88
89 61 58–69 57–70 0.5 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 89
90 61 58–69 57–70 0.5 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 90
91 60 57–68 56–69 0.4 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 91
92 60 57–68 56–69 0.4 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 92
93 60 57–68 56–69 0.4 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 93
94 59 56–67 55–68 0.3 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 94
95 59 56–67 55–68 0.3 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 95
96 58 55–66 54–67 0.3 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 96
97 58 55–66 54–67 0.3 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 97
98 57 54–65 53–66 0.2 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 98
99 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 99
100 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 100
101 55 52–63 51–64 0.1 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 101
102 55 52–63 51–64 0.1 54 51–61 50–61 0.1 102
103 54 51–62 50–64 0.1 54 51–61 50–61 0.1 103
104 53 50–62 49–63 0.1 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 104
105 53 50–62 49–63 0.1 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 105
106 52 49–61 48–62 0.1 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 106
107 51 48–60 47–61 0.1 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 107
108 50 47–59 46–60 <0.1 51 48–58 47–59 0.1 108
109 50 47–59 46–60 <0.1 51 48–58 47–59 0.1 109
108 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 3:10–3:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 109
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:0–4:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 99 94–104 93–105 47 101 97–105 96–106 53 16
17 98 93–103 92–104 45 100 96–104 95–105 50 17
18 98 93–103 92–104 45 100 96–104 95–105 50 18
19 97 92–102 91–103 42 99 95–103 94–104 47 19
20 96 91–101 90–102 39 99 95–103 94–104 47 20
NOT FOR
21 96 91–101 90–102 39 98 94–102 93–103 45 21
22 95 90–100 89–101 37 98 94–102 93–103 45 22
23 95 90–100 89–101 37 97 93–101 92–102 42 23
24 94 89–100 88–101 34 96 92–100 91–101 39 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 93 88–99 87–100 32 95 91–99 90–100 37 25
26 93 88–99 87–100 32 95 91–99 90–100 37 26
27 92 87–98 86–99 30 94 90–98 89–99 34 27
28 92 87–98 86–99 30 94 90–98 89–99 34 28
29 91 86–97 85–98 27 93 89–97 88–98 32 29
OR RESALE
30 90 85–96 84–97 25 93 89–97 88–98 32 30
31 90 85–96 84–97 25 92 88–96 87–97 30 31
32 89 84–95 83–96 23 91 87–95 86–96 27 32
33 89 84–95 83–96 23 90 86–94 85–95 25 33
34 88 83–94 82–95 21 89 85–93 84–94 23 34
35 87 82–93 81–94 19 88 84–93 83–93 21 35
36 87 82–93 81–94 19 88 84–93 83–93 21 36
37 86 81–92 80–93 18 87 83–92 82–92 19 37
38 86 81–92 80–93 18 86 82–91 81–91 18 38
39 85 81–91 80–92 16 85 81–90 81–90 16 39
40 84 80–90 79–91 14 84 80–89 80–89 14 40
41 84 80–90 79–91 14 84 80–89 80–89 14 41
42 83 79–89 78–90 13 83 79–88 79–88 13 42
43 83 79–89 78–90 13 83 79–88 79–88 13 43
44 82 78–88 77–89 12 82 78–87 78–87 12 44
45 81 77–87 76–88 10 82 78–87 78–87 12 45
46 81 77–87 76–88 10 81 77–86 77–87 10 46
47 80 76–86 75–87 9 81 77–86 77–87 10 47
48 80 76–86 75–87 9 80 76–85 76–86 9 48
49 79 75–85 74–86 8 80 76–85 76–86 9 49
50 78 74–84 73–85 7 79 75–84 75–85 8 50
51 78 74–84 73–85 7 79 75–84 75–85 8 51
52 77 73–83 72–84 6 78 75–83 74–84 7 52
53 77 73–83 72–84 6 78 75–83 74–84 7 53
54 76 72–82 71–83 5 77 74–82 73–83 6 54
110 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:0–4:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 67 63–74 62–75 1 68 65–73 64–74 2 71
72 66 62–73 61–74 1 67 64–72 63–73 1 72
73 66 62–73 61–74 1 67 64–72 63–73 1 73
74 65 62–72 61–73 1 66 63–71 62–72 1 74
75 65 62–72 61–73 1 66 63–71 62–72 1 75
NOT FOR
76 64 61–71 60–72 1 65 62–70 61–71 1 76
77 64 61–71 60–72 1 65 62–70 61–71 1 77
78 63 60–70 59–71 1 64 61–69 60–70 1 78
79 63 60–70 59–71 1 64 61–69 60–70 1 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 62 59–69 58–70 1 63 60–68 59–69 1 80
81 62 59–69 58–70 1 63 60–68 59–69 1 81
82 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 62 59–67 58–68 1 82
83 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 62 59–67 58–68 1 83
84 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 84
OR RESALE
85 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 85
86 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 86
87 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 87
88 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 88
89 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 59 56–64 55–65 0.3 89
90 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 59 56–64 55–65 0.3 90
91 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 58 55–63 54–64 0.3 91
92 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 57 54–62 53–63 0.2 92
93 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 57 54–62 53–63 0.2 93
94 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 56 53–61 52–62 0.2 94
95 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 55 52–60 51–61 0.1 95
96 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 55 52–60 51–61 0.1 96
97 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 54 51–60 50–60 0.1 97
98 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 54 51–60 50–60 0.1 98
99 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 53 50–59 49–59 0.1 99
100 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 53 50–59 49–59 0.1 100
101 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 52 49–58 49–58 0.1 101
102 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 52 49–58 49–58 0.1 102
103 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 51 48–57 48–57 0.1 103
104 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 50 47–56 47–56 <0.1 104
105 49 46–57 45–58 <0.1 49 46–55 46–55 <0.1 105
106 48 45–56 44–57 <0.1 48 45–54 45–54 <0.1 106
107 48 45–56 44–57 <0.1 48 45–54 45–54 <0.1 107
108 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 47 44–53 44–54 <0.1 108
109 46 43–54 42–55 <0.1 47 44–53 44–54 <0.1 109
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 111
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:0–4:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
112 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:2–4:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 98 93–103 92–104 45 100 96–104 95–105 50 16
17 97 92–102 91–103 42 100 96–104 95–105 50 17
18 96 91–101 90–102 39 99 95–103 94–104 47 18
19 95 90–100 89–101 37 98 94–102 93–103 45 19
20 94 89–100 88–101 34 98 94–102 93–103 45 20
NOT FOR
21 94 89–100 88–101 34 97 93–101 92–102 42 21
22 93 88–99 87–100 32 97 93–101 92–102 42 22
23 93 88–99 87–100 32 96 92–100 91–101 39 23
24 92 87–98 86–99 30 95 91–99 90–100 37 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 91 86–97 85–98 27 94 90–98 89–99 34 25
26 91 86–97 85–98 27 94 90–98 89–99 34 26
27 90 85–96 84–97 25 93 89–97 88–98 32 27
28 89 84–95 83–96 23 93 89–97 88–98 32 28
29 88 83–94 82–95 21 92 88–96 87–97 30 29
OR RESALE
30 88 83–94 82–95 21 91 87–95 86–96 27 30
31 87 82–93 81–94 19 90 86–94 85–95 25 31
32 87 82–93 81–94 19 89 85–93 84–94 23 32
33 86 81–92 80–93 18 88 84–93 83–93 21 33
34 85 81–91 80–92 16 87 83–92 82–92 19 34
35 85 81–91 80–92 16 86 82–91 81–91 18 35
36 84 80–90 79–91 14 85 81–90 81–90 16 36
37 84 80–90 79–91 14 85 81–90 81–90 16 37
38 83 79–89 78–90 13 84 80–89 80–89 14 38
39 83 79–89 78–90 13 83 79–88 79–88 13 39
40 82 78–88 77–89 12 83 79–88 79–88 13 40
41 82 78–88 77–89 12 82 78–87 78–87 12 41
42 81 77–87 76–88 10 82 78–87 78–87 12 42
43 81 77–87 76–88 10 81 77–86 77–87 10 43
44 80 76–86 75–87 9 80 76–85 76–86 9 44
45 80 76–86 75–87 9 80 76–85 76–86 9 45
46 79 75–85 74–86 8 79 75–84 75–85 8 46
47 78 74–84 73–85 7 79 75–84 75–85 8 47
48 78 74–84 73–85 7 78 75–83 74–84 7 48
49 77 73–83 72–84 6 78 75–83 74–84 7 49
50 77 73–83 72–84 6 77 74–82 73–83 6 50
51 76 72–82 71–83 5 77 74–82 73–83 6 51
52 76 72–82 71–83 5 76 73–81 72–82 5 52
53 75 71–81 70–82 5 76 73–81 72–82 5 53
54 75 71–81 70–82 5 75 72–80 71–81 5 54
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 113
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:2–4:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 65 62–72 61–73 1 66 63–71 62–72 1 71
72 64 61–71 60–72 1 65 62–70 61–71 1 72
73 64 61–71 60–72 1 65 62–70 61–71 1 73
74 63 60–70 59–71 1 64 61–69 60–70 1 74
75 63 60–70 59–71 1 64 61–69 60–70 1 75
NOT FOR
76 62 59–69 58–70 1 63 60–68 59–69 1 76
77 62 59–69 58–70 1 63 60–68 59–69 1 77
78 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 62 59–67 58–68 1 78
79 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 62 59–67 58–68 1 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 80
81 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 81
82 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 82
83 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 83
84 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 59 56–64 55–65 0.3 84
OR RESALE
85 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 59 56–64 55–65 0.3 85
86 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 58 55–63 54–64 0.3 86
87 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 58 55–63 54–64 0.3 87
88 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 57 54–62 53–63 0.2 88
89 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 57 54–62 53–63 0.2 89
90 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 56 53–61 52–62 0.2 90
91 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 56 53–61 52–62 0.2 91
92 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 55 52–60 51–61 0.1 92
93 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 54 51–60 50–60 0.1 93
94 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 54 51–60 50–60 0.1 94
95 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 53 50–59 49–59 0.1 95
96 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 53 50–59 49–59 0.1 96
97 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 52 49–58 49–58 0.1 97
98 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 52 49–58 49–58 0.1 98
99 49 46–57 45–58 <0.1 51 48–57 48–57 0.1 99
100 48 45–56 44–57 <0.1 51 48–57 48–57 0.1 100
101 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 50 47–56 47–56 <0.1 101
102 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 50 47–56 47–56 <0.1 102
103 46 43–54 42–55 <0.1 49 46–55 46–55 <0.1 103
104 46 43–54 42–55 <0.1 48 45–54 45–54 <0.1 104
105 45 43–53 42–54 <0.1 48 45–54 45–54 <0.1 105
106 44 42–52 41–53 <0.1 47 44–53 44–54 <0.1 106
107 43 41–51 40–52 <0.1 46 43–52 43–53 <0.1 107
108 42 40–50 39–51 <0.1 45 43–51 42–52 <0.1 108
109 41 39–49 38–50 <0.1 44 42–50 41–51 <0.1 109
114 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:2–4:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 115
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:4–4:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 96 91–101 90–102 39 99 95–103 94–104 47 16
17 95 90–100 89–101 37 99 95–103 94–104 47 17
18 94 89–100 88–101 34 98 94–102 93–103 45 18
19 94 89–100 88–101 34 97 93–101 92–102 42 19
20 93 88–99 87–100 32 97 93–101 92–102 42 20
NOT FOR
21 93 88–99 87–100 32 96 92–100 91–101 39 21
22 92 87–98 86–99 30 96 92–100 91–101 39 22
23 92 87–98 86–99 30 95 91–99 90–100 37 23
24 91 86–97 85–98 27 94 90–98 89–99 34 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 90 85–96 84–97 25 93 89–97 88–98 32 25
26 89 84–95 83–96 23 93 89–97 88–98 32 26
27 89 84–95 83–96 23 92 88–96 87–97 30 27
28 88 83–94 82–95 21 91 87–95 86–96 27 28
29 87 82–93 81–94 19 90 86–94 85–95 25 29
OR RESALE
30 86 81–92 80–93 18 89 85–93 84–94 23 30
31 86 81–92 80–93 18 88 84–93 83–93 21 31
32 85 81–91 80–92 16 87 83–92 82–92 19 32
33 85 81–91 80–92 16 86 82–91 81–91 18 33
34 84 80–90 79–91 14 85 81–90 81–90 16 34
35 83 79–89 78–90 13 84 80–89 80–89 14 35
36 83 79–89 78–90 13 84 80–89 80–89 14 36
37 82 78–88 77–89 12 83 79–88 79–88 13 37
38 82 78–88 77–89 12 83 79–88 79–88 13 38
39 81 77–87 76–88 10 82 78–87 78–87 12 39
40 81 77–87 76–88 10 81 77–86 77–87 10 40
41 80 76–86 75–87 9 80 76–85 76–86 9 41
42 79 75–85 74–86 8 80 76–85 76–86 9 42
43 79 75–85 74–86 8 79 75–84 75–85 8 43
44 78 74–84 73–85 7 78 75–83 74–84 7 44
45 78 74–84 73–85 7 78 75–83 74–84 7 45
46 77 73–83 72–84 6 77 74–82 73–83 6 46
47 77 73–83 72–84 6 77 74–82 73–83 6 47
48 76 72–82 71–83 5 76 73–81 72–82 5 48
49 76 72–82 71–83 5 76 73–81 72–82 5 49
50 75 71–81 70–82 5 75 72–80 71–81 5 50
51 74 70–81 69–82 4 75 72–80 71–81 5 51
52 74 70–81 69–82 4 74 71–79 70–80 4 52
53 73 69–80 68–81 4 74 71–79 70–80 4 53
54 72 68–79 67–80 3 73 70–78 69–79 4 54
116 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:4–4:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 63 60–70 59–71 1 64 61–69 60–70 1 71
72 62 59–69 58–70 1 63 60–68 59–69 1 72
73 62 59–69 58–70 1 63 60–68 59–69 1 73
74 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 62 59–67 58–68 1 74
75 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 62 59–67 58–68 1 75
NOT FOR
76 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 76
77 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 61 58–66 57–67 0.5 77
78 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 78
79 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 60 57–65 56–66 0.4 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 59 56–64 55–65 0.3 80
81 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 59 56–64 55–65 0.3 81
82 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 58 55–63 54–64 0.3 82
83 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 57 54–62 53–63 0.2 83
84 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 57 54–62 53–63 0.2 84
OR RESALE
85 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 56 53–61 52–62 0.2 85
86 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 56 53–61 52–62 0.2 86
87 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 55 52–60 51–61 0.1 87
88 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 55 52–60 51–61 0.1 88
89 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 54 51–60 50–60 0.1 89
90 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 54 51–60 50–60 0.1 90
91 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 53 50–59 49–59 0.1 91
92 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 53 50–59 49–59 0.1 92
93 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 52 49–58 49–58 0.1 93
94 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 52 49–58 49–58 0.1 94
95 49 46–57 45–58 <0.1 51 48–57 48–57 0.1 95
96 49 46–57 45–58 <0.1 51 48–57 48–57 0.1 96
97 48 45–56 44–57 <0.1 50 47–56 47–56 <0.1 97
98 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 49 46–55 46–55 <0.1 98
99 46 43–54 42–55 <0.1 48 45–54 45–54 <0.1 99
100 45 43–53 42–54 <0.1 47 44–53 44–54 <0.1 100
101 44 42–52 41–53 <0.1 47 44–53 44–54 <0.1 101
102 44 42–52 41–53 <0.1 46 43–52 43–53 <0.1 102
103 43 41–51 40–52 <0.1 45 43–51 42–52 <0.1 103
104 42 40–50 39–51 <0.1 45 43–51 42–52 <0.1 104
105 41 39–49 38–50 <0.1 44 42–50 41–51 <0.1 105
106 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 43 41–49 40–50 <0.1 106
107 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 42 40–48 39–49 <0.1 107
108 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 41 39–47 38–48 <0.1 108
109–160 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 40 38–46 37–47 <0.1 109–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 117
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:6–4:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 94 89–100 88–101 34 98 92–105 91–106 45 16
17 93 88–99 87–100 32 98 92–105 91–106 45 17
18 93 88–99 87–100 32 97 91–104 90–105 42 18
19 92 87–98 86–99 30 97 91–104 90–105 42 19
20 91 86–97 85–98 27 96 90–103 89–104 39 20
NOT FOR
21 90 85–96 84–97 25 95 89–102 88–103 37 21
22 89 84–95 83–96 23 95 89–102 88–103 37 22
23 89 84–95 83–96 23 94 88–101 87–102 34 23
24 88 83–94 82–95 21 93 87–100 86–101 32 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 87 82–93 81–95 19 92 86–99 85–100 30 25
26 87 82–93 81–95 19 92 86–99 85–100 30 26
27 86 81–93 80–94 18 91 85–98 84–99 27 27
28 85 80–92 79–93 16 90 84–97 83–98 25 28
29 85 80–92 79–93 16 89 83–96 82–98 23 29
OR RESALE
30 84 79–91 78–92 14 88 83–95 81–97 21 30
31 83 78–90 77–91 13 87 82–94 80–96 19 31
32 82 77–89 76–90 12 86 81–94 79–95 18 32
33 82 77–89 76–90 12 85 80–93 79–94 16 33
34 81 76–88 75–89 10 84 79–92 78–93 14 34
35 81 76–88 75–89 10 83 78–91 77–92 13 35
36 80 76–87 74–88 9 83 78–91 77–92 13 36
37 80 76–87 74–88 9 82 77–90 76–91 12 37
38 79 75–86 73–87 8 82 77–90 76–91 12 38
39 78 74–85 73–86 7 81 76–89 75–90 10 39
40 78 74–85 73–86 7 80 75–88 74–89 9 40
41 77 73–84 72–85 6 79 74–87 73–88 8 41
42 77 73–84 72–85 6 78 73–86 72–87 7 42
43 76 72–83 71–84 5 78 73–86 72–87 7 43
44 75 71–82 70–83 5 77 72–85 71–86 6 44
45 75 71–82 70–83 5 76 71–84 70–86 5 45
46 74 70–81 69–82 4 76 71–84 70–86 5 46
47 74 70–81 69–82 4 75 71–83 69–85 5 47
48 73 69–80 68–81 4 75 71–83 69–85 5 48
49 73 69–80 68–81 4 74 70–83 68–84 4 49
50 72 68–79 67–80 3 74 70–83 68–84 4 50
51 71 67–78 66–80 3 73 69–82 68–83 4 51
52 71 67–78 66–80 3 73 69–82 68–83 4 52
53 70 66–77 65–79 2 72 68–81 67–82 3 53
54 70 66–77 65–79 2 72 68–81 67–82 3 54
118 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:6–4:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 61 58–69 57–70 0.5 62 59–71 57–73 1 71
72 60 57–68 56–69 0.4 61 58–71 56–72 0.5 72
73 60 57–68 56–69 0.4 61 58–71 56–72 0.5 73
74 59 56–67 55–68 0.3 60 57–70 56–71 0.4 74
75 59 56–67 55–68 0.3 60 57–70 56–71 0.4 75
NOT FOR
76 58 55–66 54–67 0.3 59 56–69 55–70 0.3 76
77 58 55–66 54–67 0.3 59 56–69 55–70 0.3 77
78 57 54–65 53–66 0.2 58 55–68 54–69 0.3 78
79 57 54–65 53–66 0.2 58 55–68 54–69 0.3 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 57 54–67 53–68 0.2 80
81 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 56 53–66 52–67 0.2 81
82 55 52–63 51–64 0.1 55 52–65 51–66 0.1 82
83 54 51–62 50–64 0.1 54 51–64 50–65 0.1 83
84 54 51–62 50–64 0.1 54 51–64 50–65 0.1 84
OR RESALE
85 53 50–62 49–63 0.1 53 50–63 49–64 0.1 85
86 53 50–62 49–63 0.1 53 50–63 49–64 0.1 86
87 52 49–61 48–62 0.1 52 49–62 48–63 0.1 87
88 51 48–60 47–61 0.1 52 49–62 48–63 0.1 88
89 51 48–60 47–61 0.1 51 48–61 47–63 0.1 89
90 50 47–59 46–60 <0.1 51 48–61 47–63 0.1 90
91 49 46–58 45–59 <0.1 50 48–60 46–62 <0.1 91
92 49 46–58 45–59 <0.1 50 48–60 46–62 <0.1 92
93 48 45–57 44–58 <0.1 49 47–60 45–61 <0.1 93
94 47 44–56 43–57 <0.1 49 47–60 45–61 <0.1 94
95 46 44–55 42–56 <0.1 48 46–59 45–60 <0.1 95
96 45 43–54 42–55 <0.1 48 46–59 45–60 <0.1 96
97 44 42–53 41–54 <0.1 47 45–58 44–59 <0.1 97
98 43 41–52 40–53 <0.1 46 44–57 43–58 <0.1 98
99 42 40–51 39–52 <0.1 45 43–56 42–57 <0.1 99
100 41 39–50 38–51 <0.1 45 43–56 42–57 <0.1 100
101 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 44 42–55 41–56 <0.1 101
102 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 44 42–55 41–56 <0.1 102
103 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 43 41–54 40–55 <0.1 103
104 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 42 40–53 39–54 <0.1 104
105 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 41 39–52 38–53 <0.1 105
106–160 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 40 38–51 37–52 <0.1 106–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 119
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:8–4:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 92 87–98 86–99 30 97 91–104 90–105 42 16
17 91 86–97 85–98 27 97 91–104 90–105 42 17
18 90 85–96 84–97 25 96 90–103 89–104 39 18
19 89 84–95 83–96 23 96 90–103 89–104 39 19
20 88 83–94 82–95 21 95 89–102 88–103 37 20
NOT FOR
21 87 82–93 81–95 19 94 88–101 87–102 34 21
22 87 82–93 81–95 19 94 88–101 87–102 34 22
23 86 81–93 80–94 18 93 87–100 86–101 32 23
24 85 80–92 79–93 16 92 86–99 85–100 30 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 84 79–91 78–92 14 91 85–98 84–99 27 25
26 84 79–91 78–92 14 91 85–98 84–99 27 26
27 83 78–90 77–91 13 90 84–97 83–98 25 27
28 82 77–89 76–90 12 89 83–96 82–98 23 28
29 81 76–88 75–89 10 88 83–95 81–97 21 29
OR RESALE
30 80 76–87 74–88 9 87 82–94 80–96 19 30
31 79 75–86 73–87 8 86 81–94 79–95 18 31
32 79 75–86 73–87 8 85 80–93 79–94 16 32
33 78 74–85 73–86 7 84 79–92 78–93 14 33
34 77 73–84 72–85 6 83 78–91 77–92 13 34
35 77 73–84 72–85 6 82 77–90 76–91 12 35
36 76 72–83 71–84 5 81 76–89 75–90 10 36
37 76 72–83 71–84 5 80 75–88 74–89 9 37
38 75 71–82 70–83 5 80 75–88 74–89 9 38
39 75 71–82 70–83 5 79 74–87 73–88 8 39
40 74 70–81 69–82 4 79 74–87 73–88 8 40
41 74 70–81 69–82 4 78 73–86 72–87 7 41
42 73 69–80 68–81 4 77 72–85 71–86 6 42
43 73 69–80 68–81 4 76 71–84 70–86 5 43
44 72 68–79 67–80 3 76 71–84 70–86 5 44
45 72 68–79 67–80 3 75 71–83 69–85 5 45
46 71 67–78 66–80 3 74 70–83 68–84 4 46
47 71 67–78 66–80 3 74 70–83 68–84 4 47
48 70 66–77 65–79 2 73 69–82 68–83 4 48
49 70 66–77 65–79 2 73 69–82 68–83 4 49
50 69 65–77 64–78 2 72 68–81 67–82 3 50
51 69 65–77 64–78 2 72 68–81 67–82 3 51
52 68 64–76 63–77 2 71 67–80 66–81 3 52
53 68 64–76 63–77 2 70 66–79 65–80 2 53
54 67 63–75 62–76 1 70 66–79 65–80 2 54
120 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:8–4:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 59 56–67 55–68 0.3 60 57–70 56–71 0.4 71
72 58 55–66 54–67 0.3 59 56–69 55–70 0.3 72
73 58 55–66 54–67 0.3 59 56–69 55–70 0.3 73
74 57 54–65 53–66 0.2 58 55–68 54–69 0.3 74
75 57 54–65 53–66 0.2 58 55–68 54–69 0.3 75
NOT FOR
76 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 57 54–67 53–68 0.2 76
77 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 57 54–67 53–68 0.2 77
78 55 52–63 51–64 0.1 56 53–66 52–67 0.2 78
79 55 52–63 51–64 0.1 56 53–66 52–67 0.2 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 54 51–62 50–64 0.1 55 52–65 51–66 0.1 80
81 53 50–62 49–63 0.1 55 52–65 51–66 0.1 81
82 53 50–62 49–63 0.1 54 51–64 50–65 0.1 82
83 52 49–61 48–62 0.1 53 50–63 49–64 0.1 83
84 51 48–60 47–61 0.1 52 49–62 48–63 0.1 84
OR RESALE
85 50 47–59 46–60 <0.1 51 48–61 47–63 0.1 85
86 50 47–59 46–60 <0.1 51 48–61 47–63 0.1 86
87 49 46–58 45–59 <0.1 50 48–60 46–62 <0.1 87
88 48 45–57 44–58 <0.1 50 48–60 46–62 <0.1 88
89 47 44–56 43–57 <0.1 49 47–60 45–61 <0.1 89
90 46 44–55 42–56 <0.1 48 46–59 45–60 <0.1 90
91 45 43–54 42–55 <0.1 48 46–59 45–60 <0.1 91
92 45 43–54 42–55 <0.1 47 45–58 44–59 <0.1 92
93 44 42–53 41–54 <0.1 46 44–57 43–58 <0.1 93
94 43 41–52 40–53 <0.1 46 44–57 43–58 <0.1 94
95 42 40–51 39–52 <0.1 45 43–56 42–57 <0.1 95
96 41 39–50 38–51 <0.1 44 42–55 41–56 <0.1 96
97 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 43 41–54 40–55 <0.1 97
98 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 43 41–54 40–55 <0.1 98
99 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 42 40–53 39–54 <0.1 99
100 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 41 39–52 38–53 <0.1 100
101–160 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 40 38–51 37–52 <0.1 101–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 121
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:10–4:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 90 85–96 84–97 25 96 90–103 89–104 39 16
17 89 84–95 83–96 23 96 90–103 89–104 39 17
18 89 84–95 83–96 23 95 89–102 88–103 37 18
19 88 83–94 82–95 21 95 89–102 88–103 37 19
20 87 82–93 81–95 19 94 88–101 87–102 34 20
NOT FOR
21 86 81–93 80–94 18 93 87–100 86–101 32 21
22 85 80–92 79–93 16 93 87–100 86–101 32 22
23 84 79–91 78–92 14 92 86–99 85–100 30 23
24 83 78–90 77–91 13 91 85–98 84–99 27 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 82 77–89 76–90 12 90 84–97 83–98 25 25
26 81 76–88 75–89 10 89 83–96 82–98 23 26
27 80 76–87 74–88 9 88 83–95 81–97 21 27
28 80 76–87 74–88 9 87 82–94 80–96 19 28
29 79 75–86 73–87 8 86 81–94 79–95 18 29
OR RESALE
30 78 74–85 73–86 7 85 80–93 79–94 16 30
31 77 73–84 72–85 6 84 79–92 78–93 14 31
32 76 72–83 71–84 5 83 78–91 77–92 13 32
33 75 71–82 70–83 5 82 77–90 76–91 12 33
34 75 71–82 70–83 5 81 76–89 75–90 10 34
35 74 70–81 69–82 4 80 75–88 74–89 9 35
36 74 70–81 69–82 4 79 74–87 73–88 8 36
37 73 69–80 68–81 4 78 73–86 72–87 7 37
38 73 69–80 68–81 4 78 73–86 72–87 7 38
39 72 68–79 67–80 3 77 72–85 71–86 6 39
40 72 68–79 67–80 3 77 72–85 71–86 6 40
41 71 67–78 66–80 3 76 71–84 70–86 5 41
42 71 67–78 66–80 3 75 71–83 69–85 5 42
43 70 66–77 65–79 2 74 70–83 68–84 4 43
44 70 66–77 65–79 2 74 70–83 68–84 4 44
45 69 65–77 64–78 2 73 69–82 68–83 4 45
46 69 65–77 64–78 2 72 68–81 67–82 3 46
47 68 64–76 63–77 2 72 68–81 67–82 3 47
48 68 64–76 63–77 2 71 67–80 66–81 3 48
49 67 63–75 62–76 1 71 67–80 66–81 3 49
50 67 63–75 62–76 1 70 66–79 65–80 2 50
51 66 62–74 61–75 1 70 66–79 65–80 2 51
52 66 62–74 61–75 1 69 65–78 64–79 2 52
53 65 61–73 60–74 1 68 64–77 63–78 2 53
54 65 61–73 60–74 1 68 64–77 63–78 2 54
122 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 4:10–4:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 56 53–64 52–65 0.2 58 55–68 54–69 0.3 71
72 55 52–63 51–64 0.1 57 54–67 53–68 0.2 72
73 55 52–63 51–64 0.1 57 54–67 53–68 0.2 73
74 54 51–62 50–64 0.1 56 53–66 52–67 0.2 74
75 53 50–62 49–63 0.1 55 52–65 51–66 0.1 75
NOT FOR
76 53 50–62 49–63 0.1 55 52–65 51–66 0.1 76
77 52 49–61 48–62 0.1 54 51–64 50–65 0.1 77
78 51 48–60 47–61 0.1 53 50–63 49–64 0.1 78
79 51 48–60 47–61 0.1 53 50–63 49–64 0.1 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 50 47–59 46–60 <0.1 52 49–62 48–63 0.1 80
81 49 46–58 45–59 <0.1 51 48–61 47–63 0.1 81
82 48 45–57 44–58 <0.1 50 48–60 46–62 <0.1 82
83 47 44–56 43–57 <0.1 49 47–60 45–61 <0.1 83
84 47 44–56 43–57 <0.1 48 46–59 45–60 <0.1 84
OR RESALE
85 46 44–55 42–56 <0.1 47 45–58 44–59 <0.1 85
86 45 43–54 42–55 <0.1 47 45–58 44–59 <0.1 86
87 44 42–53 41–54 <0.1 46 44–57 43–58 <0.1 87
88 43 41–52 40–53 <0.1 46 44–57 43–58 <0.1 88
89 42 40–51 39–52 <0.1 45 43–56 42–57 <0.1 89
90 42 40–51 39–52 <0.1 44 42–55 41–56 <0.1 90
91 41 39–50 38–51 <0.1 44 42–55 41–56 <0.1 91
92 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 43 41–54 40–55 <0.1 92
93 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 42 40–53 39–54 <0.1 93
94 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 42 40–53 39–54 <0.1 94
95 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 41 39–52 38–53 <0.1 95
96 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 41 39–52 38–53 <0.1 96
97–160 40 38–49 37–50 <0.1 40 38–51 37–52 <0.1 97–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 123
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:0–5:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 89 85–94 84–95 23 95 89–101 88–103 37 16
17 88 84–93 83–94 21 95 89–101 88–103 37 17
18 87 83–92 82–93 19 94 88–100 87–102 34 18
19 86 82–91 81–92 18 94 88–100 87–102 34 19
20 85 81–90 80–91 16 93 87–100 86–101 32 20
NOT FOR
21 85 81–90 80–91 16 92 86–99 85–100 30 21
22 84 80–89 79–90 14 91 86–98 84–99 27 22
23 83 79–88 78–89 13 90 85–97 83–98 25 23
24 82 78–87 77–88 12 89 84–96 83–97 23 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 81 77–86 76–87 10 88 83–95 82–96 21 25
26 80 76–86 75–86 9 87 82–94 81–95 19 26
27 79 75–85 74–85 8 86 81–93 80–94 18 27
28 78 74–84 73–85 7 85 80–92 79–93 16 28
29 77 73–83 72–84 6 84 79–91 78–92 14 29
OR RESALE
30 76 72–82 71–83 5 83 78–90 77–91 13 30
31 75 71–81 70–82 5 82 77–89 76–90 12 31
32 74 70–80 69–81 4 81 76–88 75–90 10 32
33 73 69–79 68–80 4 80 75–87 74–89 9 33
34 73 69–79 68–80 4 79 74–87 73–88 8 34
35 72 68–78 67–79 3 78 73–86 72–87 7 35
36 72 68–78 67–79 3 77 73–85 71–86 6 36
37 71 67–77 67–78 3 76 72–84 70–85 5 37
38 70 66–76 66–77 2 76 72–84 70–85 5 38
39 70 66–76 66–77 2 75 71–83 70–84 5 39
40 69 66–75 65–76 2 75 71–83 70–84 5 40
41 69 66–75 65–76 2 74 70–82 69–83 4 41
42 68 65–74 64–75 2 73 69–81 68–82 4 42
43 68 65–74 64–75 2 72 68–80 67–81 3 43
44 67 64–73 63–74 1 72 68–80 67–81 3 44
45 67 64–73 63–74 1 71 67–79 66–80 3 45
46 66 63–72 62–73 1 70 66–78 65–79 2 46
47 65 62–71 61–72 1 70 66–78 65–79 2 47
48 65 62–71 61–72 1 69 65–77 64–78 2 48
49 64 61–70 60–71 1 69 65–77 64–78 2 49
50 64 61–70 60–71 1 68 64–76 63–77 2 50
51 63 60–69 59–70 1 68 64–76 63–77 2 51
52 63 60–69 59–70 1 67 63–75 62–77 1 52
53 62 59–68 58–69 1 66 62–74 61–76 1 53
54 62 59–68 58–69 1 66 62–74 61–76 1 54
124 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:0–5:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 55 52–64 51–65 0.1 71
72 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 55 52–64 51–65 0.1 72
73 51 48–58 47–59 0.1 54 51–63 50–64 0.1 73
74 50 47–57 46–58 <0.1 54 51–63 50–64 0.1 74
75 49 46–56 45–57 <0.1 53 50–62 49–64 0.1 75
NOT FOR
76 48 45–55 44–56 <0.1 52 49–61 48–63 0.1 76
77 47 44–54 43–55 <0.1 51 48–61 47–62 0.1 77
78 46 43–53 43–54 <0.1 50 47–60 46–61 <0.1 78
79 45 42–52 42–53 <0.1 50 47–60 46–61 <0.1 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 49 46–59 45–60 <0.1 80
81 43 41–50 40–51 <0.1 48 46–58 44–59 <0.1 81
82 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 47 45–57 43–58 <0.1 82
83 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 46 44–56 43–57 <0.1 83
84 41 39–48 38–49 <0.1 46 44–56 43–57 <0.1 84
OR RESALE
85 41 39–48 38–49 <0.1 45 43–55 42–56 <0.1 85
86 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–54 41–55 <0.1 86
87 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–54 41–55 <0.1 87
88 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 43 41–53 40–54 <0.1 88
89 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 42 40–52 39–53 <0.1 89
90 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 42 40–52 39–53 <0.1 90
91 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 41 39–51 38–52 <0.1 91
92–160 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 92–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 125
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:2–5:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 86 82–91 81–92 18 94 88–100 87–102 34 16
17 85 81–90 80–91 16 93 87–100 86–101 32 17
18 84 80–89 79–90 14 93 87–100 86–101 32 18
19 83 79–88 78–89 13 92 86–99 85–100 30 19
20 82 78–87 77–88 12 91 86–98 84–99 27 20
NOT FOR
21 81 77–86 76–87 10 90 85–97 83–98 25 21
22 81 77–86 76–87 10 89 84–96 83–97 23 22
23 80 76–86 75–86 9 88 83–95 82–96 21 23
24 79 75–85 74–85 8 87 82–94 81–95 19 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 78 74–84 73–85 7 86 81–93 80–94 18 25
26 77 73–83 72–84 6 85 80–92 79–93 16 26
27 77 73–83 72–84 6 84 79–91 78–92 14 27
28 76 72–82 71–83 5 83 78–90 77–91 13 28
29 75 71–81 70–82 5 82 77–89 76–90 12 29
OR RESALE
30 74 70–80 69–81 4 81 76–88 75–90 10 30
31 73 69–79 68–80 4 80 75–87 74–89 9 31
32 72 68–78 67–79 3 79 74–87 73–88 8 32
33 72 68–78 67–79 3 78 73–86 72–87 7 33
34 71 67–77 67–78 3 77 73–85 71–86 6 34
35 71 67–77 67–78 3 76 72–84 70–85 5 35
36 70 66–76 66–77 2 75 71–83 70–84 5 36
37 69 66–75 65–76 2 74 70–82 69–83 4 37
38 69 66–75 65–76 2 74 70–82 69–83 4 38
39 68 65–74 64–75 2 73 69–81 68–82 4 39
40 68 65–74 64–75 2 73 69–81 68–82 4 40
41 67 64–73 63–74 1 72 68–80 67–81 3 41
42 67 64–73 63–74 1 71 67–79 66–80 3 42
43 66 63–72 62–73 1 70 66–78 65–79 2 43
44 66 63–72 62–73 1 70 66–78 65–79 2 44
45 65 62–71 61–72 1 69 65–77 64–78 2 45
46 64 61–70 60–71 1 68 64–76 63–77 2 46
47 64 61–70 60–71 1 68 64–76 63–77 2 47
48 63 60–69 59–70 1 67 63–75 62–77 1 48
49 63 60–69 59–70 1 67 63–75 62–77 1 49
50 62 59–68 58–69 1 66 62–74 61–76 1 50
51 62 59–68 58–69 1 66 62–74 61–76 1 51
52 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 65 61–74 60–75 1 52
53 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 64 60–73 59–74 1 53
54 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 64 60–73 59–74 1 54
126 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:2–5:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 48 45–55 44–56 <0.1 52 49–61 48–63 0.1 71
72 47 44–54 43–55 <0.1 52 49–61 48–63 0.1 72
73 46 43–53 43–54 <0.1 51 48–61 47–62 0.1 73
74 45 42–52 42–53 <0.1 50 47–60 46–61 <0.1 74
75 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 49 46–59 45–60 <0.1 75
NOT FOR
76 43 41–50 40–51 <0.1 48 46–58 44–59 <0.1 76
77 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 47 45–57 43–58 <0.1 77
78 41 39–48 38–49 <0.1 46 44–56 43–57 <0.1 78
79 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 46 44–56 43–57 <0.1 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 45 43–55 42–56 <0.1 80
81 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–54 41–55 <0.1 81
82 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–54 41–55 <0.1 82
83 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 43 41–53 40–54 <0.1 83
84 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 43 41–53 40–54 <0.1 84
OR RESALE
85 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 42 40–52 39–53 <0.1 85
86 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 42 40–52 39–53 <0.1 86
87 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 41 39–51 38–52 <0.1 87
88–160 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 88–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 127
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:4–5:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 84 80–89 79–90 14 93 87–100 86–101 32 16
17 83 79–88 78–89 13 92 86–99 85–100 30 17
18 82 78–87 77–88 12 91 86–98 84–99 27 18
19 81 77–86 76–87 10 90 85–97 83–98 25 19
20 80 76–86 75–86 9 89 84–96 83–97 23 20
NOT FOR
21 79 75–85 74–85 8 88 83–95 82–96 21 21
22 78 74–84 73–85 7 87 82–94 81–95 19 22
23 77 73–83 72–84 6 86 81–93 80–94 18 23
24 76 72–82 71–83 5 85 80–92 79–93 16 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 75 71–81 70–82 5 84 79–91 78–92 14 25
26 74 70–80 69–81 4 83 78–90 77–91 13 26
27 73 69–79 68–80 4 82 77–89 76–90 12 27
28 72 68–78 67–79 3 81 76–88 75–90 10 28
29 72 68–78 67–79 3 80 75–87 74–89 9 29
OR RESALE
30 71 67–77 67–78 3 79 74–87 73–88 8 30
31 70 66–76 66–77 2 78 73–86 72–87 7 31
32 70 66–76 66–77 2 77 73–85 71–86 6 32
33 69 66–75 65–76 2 76 72–84 70–85 5 33
34 69 66–75 65–76 2 75 71–83 70–84 5 34
35 68 65–74 64–75 2 74 70–82 69–83 4 35
36 68 65–74 64–75 2 73 69–81 68–82 4 36
37 67 64–73 63–74 1 72 68–80 67–81 3 37
38 67 64–73 63–74 1 72 68–80 67–81 3 38
39 66 63–72 62–73 1 71 67–79 66–80 3 39
40 66 63–72 62–73 1 71 67–79 66–80 3 40
41 65 62–71 61–72 1 70 66–78 65–79 2 41
42 65 62–71 61–72 1 69 65–77 64–78 2 42
43 64 61–70 60–71 1 68 64–76 63–77 2 43
44 64 61–70 60–71 1 68 64–76 63–77 2 44
45 63 60–69 59–70 1 67 63–75 62–77 1 45
46 63 60–69 59–70 1 66 62–74 61–76 1 46
47 62 59–68 58–69 1 66 62–74 61–76 1 47
48 62 59–68 58–69 1 65 61–74 60–75 1 48
49 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 65 61–74 60–75 1 49
50 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 64 60–73 59–74 1 50
51 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 64 60–73 59–74 1 51
52 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 63 60–72 58–73 1 52
53 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 62 59–71 57–72 1 53
54 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 62 59–71 57–72 1 54
128 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:4–5:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 43 41–50 40–51 <0.1 49 46–59 45–60 <0.1 71
72 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 48 46–58 44–59 <0.1 72
73 41 39–48 38–49 <0.1 47 45–57 43–58 <0.1 73
74 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 46 44–56 43–57 <0.1 74
75 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 45 43–55 42–56 <0.1 75
NOT FOR
76 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–54 41–55 <0.1 76
77 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 43 41–53 40–54 <0.1 77
78 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 42 40–52 39–53 <0.1 78
79 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 42 40–52 39–53 <0.1 79
ADMINISTRATION
80 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 41 39–51 38–52 <0.1 80
81–160 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 81–160
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 129
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:6–5:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 82 78–87 77–88 12 91 86–98 84–99 27 16
17 81 77–86 76–87 10 90 85–97 83–98 25 17
18 80 76–86 75–86 9 89 84–96 83–97 23 18
19 79 75–85 74–85 8 88 83–95 82–96 21 19
20 78 74–84 73–85 7 87 82–94 81–95 19 20
NOT FOR
21 77 73–83 72–84 6 86 81–93 80–94 18 21
22 76 72–82 71–83 5 85 80–92 79–93 16 22
23 75 71–81 70–82 5 84 79–91 78–92 14 23
24 74 70–80 69–81 4 83 78–90 77–91 13 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 73 69–79 68–80 4 82 77–89 76–90 12 25
26 72 68–78 67–79 3 81 76–88 75–90 10 26
27 71 67–77 67–78 3 80 75–87 74–89 9 27
28 70 66–76 66–77 2 79 74–87 73–88 8 28
29 70 66–76 66–77 2 78 73–86 72–87 7 29
OR RESALE
30 69 66–75 65–76 2 77 73–85 71–86 6 30
31 69 66–75 65–76 2 76 72–84 70–85 5 31
32 68 65–74 64–75 2 75 71–83 70–84 5 32
33 67 64–73 63–74 1 74 70–82 69–83 4 33
34 67 64–73 63–74 1 73 69–81 68–82 4 34
35 66 63–72 62–73 1 73 69–81 68–82 4 35
36 66 63–72 62–73 1 72 68–80 67–81 3 36
37 65 62–71 61–72 1 71 67–79 66–80 3 37
38 65 62–71 61–72 1 70 66–78 65–79 2 38
39 64 61–70 60–71 1 69 65–77 64–78 2 39
40 64 61–70 60–71 1 69 65–77 64–78 2 40
41 63 60–69 59–70 1 68 64–76 63–77 2 41
42 63 60–69 59–70 1 67 63–75 62–77 1 42
43 62 59–68 58–69 1 66 62–74 61–76 1 43
44 62 59–68 58–69 1 66 62–74 61–76 1 44
45 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 65 61–74 60–75 1 45
46 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 64 60–73 59–74 1 46
47 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 64 60–73 59–74 1 47
48 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 63 60–72 58–73 1 48
49 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 63 60–72 58–73 1 49
50 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 62 59–71 57–72 1 50
51 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 62 59–71 57–72 1 51
52 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 61 58–70 56–71 0.5 52
53 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 60 57–69 56–70 0.4 53
54 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 59 56–68 55–69 0.3 54
130 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:6–5:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–54 41–55 <0.1 71
72 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 43 41–53 40–54 <0.1 72
73 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 42 40–52 39–53 <0.1 73
74 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 41 39–51 38–52 <0.1 74
75 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 41 39–51 38–52 <0.1 75
NOT FOR
76–160 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 76–160
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 131
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:8–5:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 80 76–86 75–86 9 89 84–96 83–97 23 16
17 79 75–85 74–85 8 88 83–95 82–96 21 17
18 78 74–84 73–85 7 87 82–94 81–95 19 18
19 77 73–83 72–84 6 86 81–93 80–94 18 19
20 76 72–82 71–83 5 85 80–92 79–93 16 20
NOT FOR
21 75 71–81 70–82 5 84 79–91 78–92 14 21
22 74 70–80 69–81 4 83 78–90 77–91 13 22
23 73 69–79 68–80 4 82 77–89 76–90 12 23
24 72 68–78 67–79 3 81 76–88 75–90 10 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 72 68–78 67–79 3 80 75–87 74–89 9 25
26 71 67–77 67–78 3 79 74–87 73–88 8 26
27 70 66–76 66–77 2 78 73–86 72–87 7 27
28 70 66–76 66–77 2 77 73–85 71–86 6 28
29 69 66–75 65–76 2 76 72–84 70–85 5 29
OR RESALE
30 68 65–74 64–75 2 75 71–83 70–84 5 30
31 68 65–74 64–75 2 74 70–82 69–83 4 31
32 67 64–73 63–74 1 73 69–81 68–82 4 32
33 66 63–72 62–73 1 72 68–80 67–81 3 33
34 66 63–72 62–73 1 71 67–79 66–80 3 34
35 65 62–71 61–72 1 71 67–79 66–80 3 35
36 65 62–71 61–72 1 70 66–78 65–79 2 36
37 64 61–70 60–71 1 69 65–77 64–78 2 37
38 64 61–70 60–71 1 68 64–76 63–77 2 38
39 63 60–69 59–70 1 67 63–75 62–77 1 39
40 63 60–69 59–70 1 67 63–75 62–77 1 40
41 62 59–68 58–69 1 66 62–74 61–76 1 41
42 62 59–68 58–69 1 65 61–74 60–75 1 42
43 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 64 60–73 59–74 1 43
44 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 64 60–73 59–74 1 44
45 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 63 60–72 58–73 1 45
46 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 62 59–71 57–72 1 46
47 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 61 58–70 56–71 0.5 47
48 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 60 57–69 56–70 0.4 48
49 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 60 57–69 56–70 0.4 49
50 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 59 56–68 55–69 0.3 50
51 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 59 56–68 55–69 0.3 51
52 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 58 55–67 54–68 0.3 52
53 54 51–61 50–61 0.1 57 54–66 53–67 0.2 53
54 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 56 53–65 52–66 0.2 54
132 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:8–5:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
71–160 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 71–160
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 133
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:10–5:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 77 73–83 72–84 6 87 82–94 81–95 19 16
17 77 73–83 72–84 6 86 81–93 80–94 18 17
18 76 72–82 71–83 5 85 80–92 79–93 16 18
19 75 71–81 70–82 5 84 79–91 78–92 14 19
20 74 70–80 69–81 4 83 78–90 77–91 13 20
NOT FOR
21 74 70–80 69–81 4 82 77–89 76–90 12 21
22 73 69–79 68–80 4 81 76–88 75–90 10 22
23 72 68–78 67–79 3 80 75–87 74–89 9 23
24 72 68–78 67–79 3 79 74–87 73–88 8 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 71 67–77 67–78 3 78 73–86 72–87 7 25
26 70 66–76 66–77 2 77 73–85 71–86 6 26
27 69 66–75 65–76 2 76 72–84 70–85 5 27
28 68 65–74 64–75 2 75 71–83 70–84 5 28
29 68 65–74 64–75 2 74 70–82 69–83 4 29
OR RESALE
30 67 64–73 63–74 1 73 69–81 68–82 4 30
31 66 63–72 62–73 1 73 69–81 68–82 4 31
32 66 63–72 62–73 1 72 68–80 67–81 3 32
33 65 62–71 61–72 1 71 67–79 66–80 3 33
34 64 61–70 60–71 1 70 66–78 65–79 2 34
35 64 61–70 60–71 1 69 65–77 64–78 2 35
36 63 60–69 59–70 1 68 64–76 63–77 2 36
37 62 59–68 58–69 1 67 63–75 62–77 1 37
38 62 59–68 58–69 1 66 62–74 61–76 1 38
39 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 65 61–74 60–75 1 39
40 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 65 61–74 60–75 1 40
41 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 64 60–73 59–74 1 41
42 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 63 60–72 58–73 1 42
43 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 62 59–71 57–72 1 43
44 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 61 58–70 56–71 0.5 44
45 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 60 57–69 56–70 0.4 45
46 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 59 56–68 55–69 0.3 46
47 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 58 55–67 54–68 0.3 47
48 54 51–61 50–61 0.1 57 54–66 53–67 0.2 48
49 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 56 53–65 52–66 0.2 49
50 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 55 52–64 51–65 0.1 50
51 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 54 51–63 50–64 0.1 51
52 51 48–58 47–59 0.1 53 50–62 49–64 0.1 52
53 50 47–57 46–58 <0.1 53 50–62 49–64 0.1 53
54 48 45–55 44–56 <0.1 52 49–61 48–63 0.1 54
134 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 5:10–5:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 135
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 6:0–6:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 76 72–82 71–83 5 86 81–92 80–93 18 16
17 75 71–81 70–82 5 85 81–91 80–92 16 17
18 74 70–80 69–81 4 84 80–90 79–91 14 18
19 73 69–79 68–80 4 83 79–89 78–90 13 19
20 73 69–79 68–80 4 82 78–88 77–89 12 20
NOT FOR
21 72 68–78 67–79 3 81 77–87 76–88 10 21
22 71 67–77 67–78 3 80 76–86 75–87 9 22
23 71 67–77 67–78 3 79 75–85 74–86 8 23
24 70 66–76 66–77 2 78 74–84 73–85 7 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 69 66–75 65–76 2 77 73–83 72–84 6 25
26 68 65–74 64–75 2 76 72–82 71–83 5 26
27 67 64–73 63–74 1 75 71–81 70–82 5 27
28 66 63–72 62–73 1 74 70–81 69–82 4 28
29 66 63–72 62–73 1 73 69–80 68–81 4 29
OR RESALE
30 65 62–71 61–72 1 72 68–79 67–80 3 30
31 65 62–71 61–72 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 31
32 64 61–70 60–71 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 32
33 63 60–69 59–70 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 33
34 62 59–68 58–69 1 69 65–76 64–77 2 34
35 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 68 64–75 63–76 2 35
36 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 67 63–74 62–75 1 36
37 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 66 62–73 61–74 1 37
38 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 65 62–72 61–73 1 38
39 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 65 62–72 61–73 1 39
40 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 64 61–71 60–72 1 40
41 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 63 60–70 59–71 1 41
42 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 62 59–69 58–70 1 42
43 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 43
44 54 51–61 50–61 0.1 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 44
45 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 45
46 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 46
47 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 47
48 51 48–58 47–59 0.1 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 48
49 50 47–57 46–58 <0.1 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 49
50 48 45–55 44–56 <0.1 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 50
51 47 44–54 43–55 <0.1 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 51
52 46 43–53 43–54 <0.1 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 52
53 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 53
54 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 49 46–57 45–58 <0.1 54
136 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 6:0–6:1
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 137
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 6:2–6:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 74 70–80 69–81 4 84 80–90 79–91 14 16
17 74 70–80 69–81 4 83 79–89 78–90 13 17
18 73 69–79 68–80 4 82 78–88 77–89 12 18
19 72 68–78 67–79 3 81 77–87 76–88 10 19
20 71 67–77 67–78 3 80 76–86 75–87 9 20
NOT FOR
21 70 66–76 66–77 2 79 75–85 74–86 8 21
22 69 66–75 65–76 2 78 74–84 73–85 7 22
23 69 66–75 65–76 2 77 73–83 72–84 6 23
24 68 65–74 64–75 2 76 72–82 71–83 5 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 68 65–74 64–75 2 75 71–81 70–82 5 25
26 67 64–73 63–74 1 74 70–81 69–82 4 26
27 66 63–72 62–73 1 73 69–80 68–81 4 27
28 65 62–71 61–72 1 72 68–79 67–80 3 28
29 65 62–71 61–72 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 29
OR RESALE
30 64 61–70 60–71 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 30
31 64 61–70 60–71 1 69 65–76 64–77 2 31
32 63 60–69 59–70 1 69 65–76 64–77 2 32
33 62 59–68 58–69 1 68 64–75 63–76 2 33
34 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 67 63–74 62–75 1 34
35 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 66 62–73 61–74 1 35
36 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 65 62–72 61–73 1 36
37 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 64 61–71 60–72 1 37
38 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 63 60–70 59–71 1 38
39 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 62 59–69 58–70 1 39
40 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 40
41 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 41
42 54 51–61 50–61 0.1 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 42
43 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 43
44 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 44
45 51 48–58 47–59 0.1 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 45
46 50 47–57 46–58 <0.1 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 46
47 48 45–55 44–56 <0.1 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 47
48 47 44–54 43–55 <0.1 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 48
49 45 42–52 42–53 <0.1 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 49
50 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 49 46–57 45–58 <0.1 50
51 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 48 45–56 44–57 <0.1 51
52 41 39–48 38–49 <0.1 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 52
53 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 46 43–54 42–55 <0.1 53
54 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–52 41–53 <0.1 54
138 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 6:2–6:3
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 139
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 6:4–6:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 73 69–79 68–80 4 82 78–88 77–89 12 16
17 72 68–78 67–79 3 81 77–87 76–88 10 17
18 71 67–77 67–78 3 80 76–86 75–87 9 18
19 70 66–76 66–77 2 79 75–85 74–86 8 19
20 70 66–76 66–77 2 78 74–84 73–85 7 20
NOT FOR
21 69 66–75 65–76 2 77 73–83 72–84 6 21
22 68 65–74 64–75 2 76 72–82 71–83 5 22
23 68 65–74 64–75 2 75 71–81 70–82 5 23
24 67 64–73 63–74 1 74 70–81 69–82 4 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 66 63–72 62–73 1 73 69–80 68–81 4 25
26 66 63–72 62–73 1 72 68–79 67–80 3 26
27 65 62–71 61–72 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 27
28 64 61–70 60–71 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 28
29 63 60–69 59–70 1 69 65–76 64–77 2 29
OR RESALE
30 63 60–69 59–70 1 69 65–76 64–77 2 30
31 62 59–68 58–69 1 68 64–75 63–76 2 31
32 62 59–68 58–69 1 67 63–74 62–75 1 32
33 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 66 62–73 61–74 1 33
34 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 65 62–72 61–73 1 34
35 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 64 61–71 60–72 1 35
36 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 63 60–70 59–71 1 36
37 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 62 59–69 58–70 1 37
38 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 38
39 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 39
40 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 40
41 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 41
42 51 48–58 47–59 0.1 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 42
43 49 46–56 45–57 <0.1 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 43
44 47 44–54 43–55 <0.1 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 44
45 45 42–52 42–53 <0.1 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 45
46 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 49 46–57 45–58 <0.1 46
47 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 47
48 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 46 43–54 42–55 <0.1 48
49 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 45 43–53 42–54 <0.1 49
50 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–52 41–53 <0.1 50
51 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 42 40–50 39–51 <0.1 51
52 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 41 39–49 38–50 <0.1 52
53–160 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 53–160
140 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 6:6–6:7
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 72 68–78 67–79 3 80 76–86 75–87 9 16
17 71 67–77 67–78 3 79 75–85 74–86 8 17
18 70 66–76 66–77 2 78 74–84 73–85 7 18
19 69 66–75 65–76 2 77 73–83 72–84 6 19
20 69 66–75 65–76 2 76 72–82 71–83 5 20
NOT FOR
21 68 65–74 64–75 2 75 71–81 70–82 5 21
22 67 64–73 63–74 1 74 70–81 69–82 4 22
23 67 64–73 63–74 1 73 69–80 68–81 4 23
24 66 63–72 62–73 1 72 68–79 67–80 3 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 65 62–71 61–72 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 25
26 65 62–71 61–72 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 26
27 64 61–70 60–71 1 69 65–76 64–77 2 27
28 63 60–69 59–70 1 68 64–75 63–76 2 28
29 63 60–69 59–70 1 67 63–74 62–75 1 29
OR RESALE
30 62 59–68 58–69 1 67 63–74 62–75 1 30
31 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 66 62–73 61–74 1 31
32 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 65 62–72 61–73 1 32
33 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 64 61–71 60–72 1 33
34 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 63 60–70 59–71 1 34
35 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 35
36 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 36
37 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 37
38 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 38
39 50 47–57 46–58 <0.1 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 39
40 49 46–56 45–57 <0.1 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 40
41 48 45–55 44–56 <0.1 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 41
42 46 43–53 43–54 <0.1 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 42
43 45 42–52 42–53 <0.1 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 43
44 43 41–50 40–51 <0.1 48 45–56 44–57 <0.1 44
45 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 45
46 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 45 43–53 42–54 <0.1 46
47 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–52 41–53 <0.1 47
48 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 43 41–51 40–52 <0.1 48
49 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 41 39–49 38–50 <0.1 49
50–160 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 50–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 141
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 6:8–6:9
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 71 67–77 67–78 3 78 74–84 73–85 7 16
17 70 66–76 66–77 2 77 73–83 72–84 6 17
18 69 66–75 65–76 2 76 72–82 71–83 5 18
19 68 65–74 64–75 2 75 71–81 70–82 5 19
20 68 65–74 64–75 2 74 70–81 69–82 4 20
NOT FOR
21 67 64–73 63–74 1 73 69–80 68–81 4 21
22 66 63–72 62–73 1 72 68–79 67–80 3 22
23 65 62–71 61–72 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 23
24 64 61–70 60–71 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 63 60–69 59–70 1 69 65–76 64–77 2 25
26 63 60–69 59–70 1 68 64–75 63–76 2 26
27 62 59–68 58–69 1 67 63–74 62–75 1 27
28 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 66 62–73 61–74 1 28
29 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 65 62–72 61–73 1 29
OR RESALE
30 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 64 61–71 60–72 1 30
31 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 63 60–70 59–71 1 31
32 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 32
33 54 51–61 50–61 0.1 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 33
34 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 34
35 51 48–58 47–59 0.1 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 35
36 50 47–57 46–58 <0.1 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 36
37 48 45–55 44–56 <0.1 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 37
38 46 43–53 43–54 <0.1 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 38
39 44 42–51 41–52 <0.1 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 39
40 42 40–49 39–50 <0.1 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 40
41 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 48 45–56 44–57 <0.1 41
42 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 46 43–54 42–55 <0.1 42
43 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 44 42–52 41–53 <0.1 43
44 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 42 40–50 39–51 <0.1 44
45 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 41 39–49 38–50 <0.1 45
46–160 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 46–160
142 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 6:10–6:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 70 66–76 66–77 2 77 73–83 72–84 6 16
17 69 66–75 65–76 2 76 72–82 71–83 5 17
18 68 65–74 64–75 2 75 71–81 70–82 5 18
19 67 64–73 63–74 1 74 70–81 69–82 4 19
20 66 63–72 62–73 1 73 69–80 68–81 4 20
NOT FOR
21 65 62–71 61–72 1 72 68–79 67–80 3 21
22 64 61–70 60–71 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 22
23 63 60–69 59–70 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 23
24 62 59–68 58–69 1 69 65–76 64–77 2 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 61 58–67 57–68 0.5 68 64–75 63–76 2 25
26 60 57–66 56–67 0.4 66 62–73 61–74 1 26
27 59 56–65 55–66 0.3 65 62–72 61–73 1 27
28 58 55–64 54–65 0.3 64 61–71 60–72 1 28
29 57 54–63 53–64 0.2 63 60–70 59–71 1 29
OR RESALE
30 56 53–62 52–63 0.2 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 30
31 55 52–62 51–62 0.1 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 31
32 53 50–60 49–61 0.1 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 32
33 52 49–59 48–60 0.1 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 33
34 49 46–56 45–57 <0.1 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 34
35 47 44–54 43–55 <0.1 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 35
36 45 42–52 42–53 <0.1 53 50–61 49–62 0.1 36
37 43 41–50 40–51 <0.1 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 37
38 41 39–48 38–49 <0.1 51 48–59 47–60 0.1 38
39 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 49 46–57 45–58 <0.1 39
40 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 40
41 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 45 43–53 42–54 <0.1 41
42 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 43 41–51 40–52 <0.1 42
43 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 41 39–49 38–50 <0.1 43
44–160 40 38–47 37–48 <0.1 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 44–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 143
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 7:0–7:2
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 68 64–76 63–77 2 75 71–81 70–82 5 16
17 67 63–75 62–77 1 74 70–81 69–82 4 17
18 66 62–74 61–76 1 73 69–80 68–81 4 18
19 65 61–74 60–75 1 72 68–79 67–80 3 19
20 64 60–73 59–74 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 20
NOT FOR
21 63 60–72 58–73 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 21
22 61 58–70 56–71 0.5 69 65–76 64–77 2 22
23 60 57–69 56–70 0.4 68 64–75 63–76 2 23
24 59 56–68 55–69 0.3 67 63–74 62–75 1 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 57 54–66 53–67 0.2 66 62–73 61–74 1 25
26 56 53–65 52–66 0.2 64 61–71 60–72 1 26
27 54 51–63 50–64 0.1 62 59–69 58–70 1 27
28 53 50–62 49–64 0.1 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 28
29 51 48–61 47–62 0.1 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 29
OR RESALE
30 49 46–59 45–60 <0.1 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 30
31 47 45–57 43–58 <0.1 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 31
32 45 43–55 42–56 <0.1 56 53–63 52–64 0.2 32
33 42 40–52 39–53 <0.1 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 33
34 41 39–51 38–52 <0.1 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 34
35 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 35
36 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 48 45–56 44–57 <0.1 36
37 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 37
38 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 45 43–53 42–54 <0.1 38
39 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 43 41–51 40–52 <0.1 39
40 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 41 39–49 38–50 <0.1 40
41–160 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 41–160
144 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 7:3–7:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 66 62–74 61–76 1 73 69–80 68–81 4 16
17 65 61–74 60–75 1 72 68–79 67–80 3 17
18 64 60–73 59–74 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 18
19 62 59–71 57–72 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 19
20 61 58–70 56–71 0.5 69 65–76 64–77 2 20
NOT FOR
21 60 57–69 56–70 0.4 67 63–74 62–75 1 21
22 58 55–67 54–68 0.3 66 62–73 61–74 1 22
23 57 54–66 53–67 0.2 65 62–72 61–73 1 23
24 55 52–64 51–65 0.1 64 61–71 60–72 1 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 53 50–62 49–64 0.1 63 60–70 59–71 1 25
26 50 47–60 46–61 <0.1 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 26
27 48 46–58 44–59 <0.1 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 27
28 46 44–56 43–57 <0.1 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 28
29 44 42–54 41–55 <0.1 54 51–62 50–63 0.1 29
OR RESALE
30 42 40–52 39–53 <0.1 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 30
31 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 31
32 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 48 45–56 44–57 <0.1 32
33 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 46 43–54 42–55 <0.1 33
34 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 44 42–52 41–53 <0.1 34
35 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 42 40–50 39–51 <0.1 35
36 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 41 39–49 38–50 <0.1 36
37–160 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 37–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 145
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 7:6–7:8
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 64 60–73 59–74 1 71 67–78 66–79 3 16
17 63 60–72 58–73 1 70 66–77 65–78 2 17
18 61 58–70 56–71 0.5 69 65–76 64–77 2 18
19 59 56–68 55–69 0.3 67 63–74 62–75 1 19
20 57 54–66 53–67 0.2 66 62–73 61–74 1 20
NOT FOR
21 56 53–65 52–66 0.2 64 61–71 60–72 1 21
22 54 51–63 50–64 0.1 63 60–70 59–71 1 22
23 52 49–61 48–63 0.1 62 59–69 58–70 1 23
24 50 47–60 46–61 <0.1 60 57–67 56–68 0.4 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 47 45–57 43–58 <0.1 58 55–65 54–66 0.3 25
26 45 43–55 42–56 <0.1 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 26
27 42 40–52 39–53 <0.1 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 27
28 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 28
29 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 29
OR RESALE
30 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 45 43–53 42–54 <0.1 30
31 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 43 41–51 40–52 <0.1 31
32 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 42 40–50 39–51 <0.1 32
33 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 41 39–49 38–50 <0.1 33
34–160 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 34–160
146 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 7:9–7:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 61 58–70 56–71 0.5 69 65–76 64–77 2 16
17 59 56–68 55–69 0.3 67 63–74 62–75 1 17
18 58 55–67 54–68 0.3 65 62–72 61–73 1 18
19 55 52–64 51–65 0.1 63 60–70 59–71 1 19
20 53 50–62 49–64 0.1 61 58–68 57–69 0.5 20
NOT FOR
21 51 48–61 47–62 0.1 59 56–66 55–67 0.3 21
22 48 46–58 44–59 <0.1 57 54–64 53–65 0.2 22
23 46 44–56 43–57 <0.1 55 52–62 51–63 0.1 23
24 43 41–53 40–54 <0.1 52 49–60 48–61 0.1 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 50 47–58 46–59 <0.1 25
26 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 47 44–55 43–56 <0.1 26
27 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 45 43–53 42–54 <0.1 27
28 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 43 41–51 40–52 <0.1 28
29 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 42 40–50 39–51 <0.1 29
OR RESALE
30 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 41 39–49 38–50 <0.1 30
31–160 40 38–50 37–51 <0.1 40 38–48 37–49 <0.1 31–160
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 147
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 8:0–8:2
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 56 55–71 53–73 0.2 64 60–73 59–75 1 16
17 54 53–70 51–71 0.1 62 59–71 57–73 1 17
18 51 51–67 49–69 0.1 60 57–70 56–71 0.4 18
19 49 49–65 47–67 <0.1 57 54–67 53–68 0.2 19
20 47 47–64 46–65 <0.1 55 52–65 51–66 0.1 20
NOT FOR
21 44 45–61 43–63 <0.1 52 49–62 48–63 0.1 21
22 42 43–60 41–61 <0.1 49 47–60 45–61 <0.1 22
23 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 47 45–58 44–59 <0.1 23
24 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 45 43–56 42–57 <0.1 24
ADMINISTRATION
25 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 43 41–54 40–55 <0.1 25
26–160 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 40 38–51 37–52 <0.1 26–160
OR RESALE
148 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 8:3–8:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 53 52–69 51–70 0.1 59 56–69 55–70 0.3 16
17 50 50–66 48–68 <0.1 57 54–67 53–68 0.2 17
18 48 48–65 46–66 <0.1 55 52–65 51–66 0.1 18
19 45 46–62 44–64 <0.1 53 50–63 49–64 0.1 19
20 41 42–59 41–60 <0.1 51 48–61 47–63 0.1 20
NOT FOR
21 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 48 46–59 45–60 <0.1 21
22 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 45 43–56 42–57 <0.1 22
23 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 43 41–54 40–55 <0.1 23
24–160 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 40 38–51 37–52 <0.1 24–160
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 149
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 8:6–8:8
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 47 47–64 46–65 <0.1 57 54–67 53–68 0.2 16
17 44 45–61 43–63 <0.1 55 52–65 51–66 0.1 17
18 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 53 50–63 49–64 0.1 18
19 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 51 48–61 47–63 0.1 19
20 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 48 46–59 45–60 <0.1 20
NOT FOR
21 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 45 43–56 42–57 <0.1 21
22 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 43 41–54 40–55 <0.1 22
23–160 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 40 38–51 37–52 <0.1 23–160
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
150 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 8:9–8:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 48 46–59 45–60 <0.1 16
17 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 45 43–56 42–57 <0.1 17
18 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 43 41–54 40–55 <0.1 18
19 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 41 39–52 38–53 <0.1 19
20 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 41 39–52 38–53 <0.1 20
NOT FOR
21–160 40 41–58 40–59 <0.1 40 38–51 37–52 <0.1 21–160
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 151
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 9:0–9:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
16 40 43–60 41–62 <0.1 41 40–54 39–55 <0.1 16
17–160 40 43–60 41–62 <0.1 40 39–53 38–54 <0.1 17–160
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
152 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 9:6–9:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 153
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 10:0–10:5
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
154 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 10:6–10:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 155
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 11:0–11:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
156 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 12:0–12:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 157
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 13:0–13:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
158 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 14:0–15:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 159
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 16:0–17:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
160 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 18:0–19:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles 161
Table A.1 Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex (continued)
Ages 20:0–21:11
Female Male
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
162 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix A ■ Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, and Percentiles
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix B ■ Age Equivalents for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex 163
SAMPLE,
16 4:0–4:1 4:2–4:3
17 3:10–3:11 4:0–4:1
18 3:10–3:11 4:0–4:1
19 3:8–3:9 3:10–3:11
NOT FOR
20 3:6–3:7 3:10–3:11
21 3:6–3:7 3:8–3:9
22 3:4–3:5 3:8–3:9
23 3:4–3:5 3:6–3:7
ADMINISTRATION
24 3:2–3:3 3:4–3:5
25 3:2–3:3 3:4–3:5
26 3:0–3:1 3:4–3:5
27 3:0–3:1 3:2–3:3
OR RESALE
28 2:10–2:11 3:2–3:3
29 2:10–2:11 3:0–3:1
30 2:8–2:9 3:0–3:1
31 2:8–2:9 3:0–3:1
32 2:8–2:9 2:10–2:11
33 2:8–2:9 2:10–2:11
34 2:6–2:7 2:8–2:9
35 2:6–2:7 2:6–2:7
36 2:6–2:7 2:4–2:5
37 2:6–2:7 2:2–2:3
38 2:4–2:5 2:2–2:3
39 2:4–2:5 2:0–2:1
40 2:4–2:5 2:0–2:1
41 2:4–2:5 <2:0
42 2:2–2:3 <2:0
43 2:2–2:3 <2:0
44 2:2–2:3 <2:0
45 2:0–2:1 <2:0
46 2:0–2:1 <2:0
47–160 <2:0 <2:0
164 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix B ■ Age Equivalents for the Normative Sample by Age and Sex
Table C.1 Ages at Which 90% of the KLPA–3 Normative Sample Suppressed Each Phonological Process
Table C.2 Percent of Occurrence Corresponding to KLPA–3 Phonological Errors in the Normative Sample
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix C ■ Suppression and Occurrence of the Phonological Processes in the Normative Sample by Age 165
2:6–2:11 SR SR
3:6–3:11 DF
4:6–4:11 CS, PF PF
5:0–5:11
6:0–6:11 VOC, GL
7:0–7:11 GL
8:0–8:11 VOC
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
166 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix C ■ Suppression and Occurrence of the Phonological Processes in the Normative Sample by Age
Table C.2 Percent of Occurrence Corresponding to KLPA–3 Phonological Errors in the Normative Sample
Manner Place Reduction Voicing
Stopping of Deletion
Gliding of fricatives Stridency Palatal Velar Cluster of final Syllable Final Initial
0158012879_KLPA3_MAN.indb 167
Deaffrication liquids and affricates deletion Vocalization fronting fronting simplification consonant reduction devoicing voicing
Total number of
possible errors 8 20 48 42 15 12 23 23 36 25 35 33
Number of errors
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 13 5 2 2 7 8 4 4 3 4 3 3
2 25 10 4 5 13 17 9 9 6 8 6 6
3 38 15 6 7 20 25 13 13 8 12 9 9
4 50 20 8 10 27 33 17 17 11 16 11 12
5 63 25 10 12 33 42 22 22 14 20 14 15
6 75 30 13 14 40 50 26 26 17 24 17 18
7 88 35 15 17 47 58 30 30 19 28 20 21
8 100 40 17 19 53 67 35 35 22 32 23 24
9 45 19 21 60 75 39 39 25 36 26 27
10 50 21 24 67 83 43 43 28 40 29 30
11 55 23 26 73 92 48 48 31 44 31 33
12 60 25 29 80 100 52 52 33 48 34 36
13 65 27 31 87 57 57 36 52 37 39
14 70 29 33 93 61 61 39 56 40 42
15 75 31 36 100 65 65 42 60 43 45
16 80 33 38 70 70 44 64 46 48
17 85 35 40 74 74 47 68 49 52
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
18 90 38 43 78 78 50 72 51 55
19 95 40 45 83 83 53 76 54 58
20 100 42 48 87 87 56 80 57 61
21
22
44
46
OR RESALE
50
52
91
96
91
96
58
61
84
88
60
63
64
67
23 48 55 100 100 64 92 66 70
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix C ■ Suppression and Occurrence of the Phonological Processes in the Normative Sample by Age
24 50 57 67 96 69 73
25 52 60 69 100 71 76
167
ADMINISTRATION
8/31/15 3:40 PM
tab_13_Percent_Occurrence cont.
Table C.2 Percent of Occurrence Corresponding to KLPA–3 Phonological Errors in the Normative Sample (continued)
168
Manner Place Reduction Voicing
Stopping of Deletion
Gliding of fricatives Stridency Palatal Velar Cluster of final Syllable Final Initial
0158012879_KLPA3_MAN.indb 168
Deaffrication liquids and affricates deletion Vocalization fronting fronting simplification consonant reduction devoicing voicing
Total number of
possible errors 8 20 48 42 15 12 23 23 36 25 35 33
Number of errors
26 54 62 72 74 79
27 56 64 75 77 82
28 58 67 78 80 85
29 60 69 81 83 88
30 63 71 83 86 91
31 65 74 86 89 94
32 67 76 89 91 97
33 69 79 92 94 100
34 71 81 94 97
35 73 83 97 100
36 75 86 100
37 77 88
38 79 90
39 81 93
40 83 95
41 85 98
42 88 100
43 90
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
44 92
45 94
46 96
47
48
98
100
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix C ■ Suppression and Occurrence of the Phonological Processes in the Normative Sample by Age
ADMINISTRATION
8/31/15 3:40 PM
Appendix D
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix D ■ List of Examiners for the Tryout and Standardization Research Phases 169
SAMPLE,
Deanna Clark Irvine Apopka
Soldotna Kera Lefler Kristi Jackley
Amy Hogue Murrieta Brandon
NOT FOR
Arizona Denise Smith Kristen Bond
Avondale Orange Davie
Meghan Cabanilla Elizabeth Deller Robyn Nadler
ADMINISTRATION
Gilbert Roseville Eustis
Margaret Jetty Melanie Rivera Marcia Shapiro
Julie Jones-Black South Lake Tahoe Hollywood
OR RESALE
Erinn Lind
Robin Thayer
Glendale
Carey Galles
Stockton
Christine Swan
Vanessa Montoya
Lake Worth
Maria Edward
Nicole Weber Colorado Lakeland
Kingman Aurora Gissel Marmol
Jennifer Howe Deborah Diedrich Anderson Melbourne
Oro Valley Aurora Sara Bretz
Kimberly Smejkal Catherine Newton Miami
Phoenix Castle Rock Monica Galvez
Heidi Benson Rodriguez Brenda Mortensen North Lauderdale
Scottsdale Centennial Demetria Rawls
Jennifer Schwartz Dianne Fulwider Orlando
Tucson Colorado Springs Laura Sajeski
Krista Tolo Renae Allemann Vivian Seda
Amy Graham Port Saint Lucie
Amanda Lindsay
170 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix D ■ List of Examiners for the Tryout and Standardization Research Phases
SAMPLE,
Patricia Sullivan Katherine Doherty Springs
Loganville Homer Glen Melanie Mulkey
Angel Ferguson Amy Handzik Independence
NOT FOR
Hawaii Raleigh Celeste Mauro
Honolulu Jessica Morber Maryland
Brandi Merryman Saint Charles Baltimore
ADMINISTRATION
Idaho Karlen Tolkson Donna Azman
Boise Springfield Easton
Amber Romriell Melissa Cory Gladys Marcum
OR RESALE
Idaho Falls
Ashley Guthrie
Meridian
Laura Reitz
Waterloo
Dawn Cross
Ellicott City
Emily Markus
Gaithersburg
Emily Sorensen Indiana Kevin Crippen
Middleton La Porte Massachusetts
Angela Clegg Erin Conroy Athol
Melissa DeLamere Iowa Jasmine Ribeiro
Loris Friesen Spencer Auburn
Nampa Lindy Laubenthal Matthew Frederick
Melissa Swander Kansas Mendon
Illinois Overland Park Amanda Farley
Algonquin Martha Allee Somerville
Marie Anne Hoffmann Wellington Kathleen Dougherty
Bedford Park Renee Ferguson Michigan
Paula Moore Berrien Springs
Michelle Anzuers
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix D ■ List of Examiners for the Tryout and Standardization Research Phases 171
SAMPLE,
Carter Baer Kimberly Green Megan Wingert
Kalamazoo Jackson New York
Lauren Goetting Polly Koch Mona Greenfield
NOT FOR
Lowell Kansas City Ontario
Rachel Ort Brandy Mosier Jane Aubertine
White Lake O’Fallon Rochester
ADMINISTRATION
Leah King Colleen Martens Suzanne Engle
Minnesota Saint Louis Ellen Shulman
Duluth Kelly Brady Saratoga Springs
OR RESALE
Abbie Pannkuk
Grand Rapids
Pamela Olson
Rasheedah Furqan
Bernadette Pankey
Slater
Rebecca C. Gestwick
Walworth
Janice Gibala Broxholm
Luverne Sarah E. Marriott North Carolina
Jacqueline Johnson Montana Boone
Maple Grove Ennis Sheila Temple
Anisha Knatcal Kaitlin Sonderer Burlington
Woodbury Nebraska Kathleen Maxfield
Angela Vokac Aurora Charlotte
Mississippi Rhonda Standage Melissa Maxwell
Canton New Jersey Cornelius
Dorothy Taylor Old Tappan Tracy Eakins
Jackson Olga Di Palo Anita Risdon
Germaine Graham New Mexico Graham
Jasmine Topp Los Lunas Stefanie Nance
Alisha Romero-Moore
172 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix D ■ List of Examiners for the Tryout and Standardization Research Phases
SAMPLE,
Cincinnati Chester Hewitt
Emily Otto Crystal Randolph Shelly Stripling
Leetonia Greenville Kyle
NOT FOR
Carly Coldwell Julia Mari Colon Latrichielle Sorrells
Oklahoma Greer Live Oak
Broken Arrow Anita Schumaker Allison Staves
ADMINISTRATION
Ashley Lemaster Simpsonville Lubbock
Heavener Tiffany Scott Ashley Roark
Brandi Duncan South Dakota Mission
Jenks
OR RESALE
Sandra Smith
Newcastle
Rapid City
Samantha Hoff
Wessington
Frances De La Garza
Richmond
Amy Young
DeAnn Smith Lori Liebing San Antonio
Oklahoma City Tennessee Julie Cripps
Shelley Ryland Bartlett Sarah Galvan-Rodriguez
Sapulpa Andrea Moore Yolanda Garcia
Casey Nelson Blountville Saher Hyderali
Tulsa Samantha Wampler Amanda Martinez
Jessica MacDonald Cleveland Chastity Martinez
Oregon Kathryne Kerley Nina Moreno
Ashland Cordova Dora Munoz
Jeanne Chouard Adrienne Jackson Kristina Navarro
Portland Nashville Madeleine Paul
Laura Jensen Geneine Snell Beatrice Villarreal
Rachel Walker
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix D ■ List of Examiners for the Tryout and Standardization Research Phases 173
SAMPLE,
Burlington Plymouth
Colleen Quaglietta Jennifer Kiekhoefer
Hyde Park South Range
NOT FOR
Stacey Moulton Sarah James
Milton Wabeno
Jenna Lewandowski Amy Stefanovic
ADMINISTRATION
Saint Albans Wauwatosa
Kristine Jenkins Laura Murray
Virginia
OR RESALE
Fredericksburg
Jacquelyn Tabony
Marion
Leigh Porter
Midlothian
Melanie Derry
Purcellville
Jana Bennett
Williamsburg
Amanda Beavers
Woodbridge
Crystal Joson
Washington
Kent
Sharon Hughes
174 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix D ■ List of Examiners for the Tryout and Standardization Research Phases
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix E ■ Phonetic Symbols and Diacritics for Transcription 175
SAMPLE,
v vacuum vækjum ə zebra zibrə
ɵ thumb ɵʌm knife naɪf
ð that ðæt house haʊs
NOT FOR
s soap sop boy bɔɪ
z zebra zibrə ɝ shirt ʃɝt
ʃ shoe ʃu ɚ brother brʌðɚ
ADMINISTRATION
ʒ television tɘləvɪʒən
ʧ chair ʧɘr
ʤ giraffe ʤəræf
l lion laɪən
OR RESALE
r red rɘd
j yellow jɘlo
w watch wɑʧ
~ Nasalization r ı̃
͆ Dentalization st̪ɑr
ᵔ Lateralization slaɪd
: Prolongation n:
ʰ Aspiration pʰəʤɑməz
˺ Unreleased k ̚ʌp
. Syllabic ӕpl.
176 Khan-Lewis Phonological Analysis ■ Appendix E ■ Phonetic Symbols and Diacritics for Transcription
Reproducible Pages
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
m n ŋ m n ŋ m n ŋ
p b t d ʧ ʤ k g p b t d ʧ ʤ k g p b t d ʧ ʤ k g
ɵ ð ɵ ð ɵ ð
f v ʃ f v ʃ ʒ f v ʃ ʒ
s z s z s z
r r r ɚ
w j h w j h
l l l əl
NOT FOR
2:0–2:5 FDV, IV DF, FDV, IV
2:6–2:11 SR SR
ADMINISTRATION
3:6–3:11 DF
4:6–4:11 CS, PF PF
OR RESALE
C
5:0–5:11
W
6:0–6:11 VOC, GL r
P
7:0–7:11 GL
o
8:0–8:11 VOC P
N
8
P
Summary of Consonant Analysis
• Phonetic Inventory _______________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
015801284
• Core Phonological Processes ______________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
• Supplemental Phonological Processes _____________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
• Other Phonological Process _______________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
• Processes Per Word (PPW) ________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Copyright © 2015 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. This page is reproducible, with copyright notice.
KLPA–3 j Analysis Form 11
i u Fronting
leaf zoo
High Centralization
ɪ ʊ
pig cookie Decentralization
e ə o
plate zebra soap Raising
Mid
ɘ ʌ ɔ Lowering
web cup frog
æ ɑ Diphthongization
Low hammer watch
Monophthongization
Diphthongs
house knife boy
SAMPLE,
Summary of Vowel Analysis
• Vowels Produced _________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NOT FOR
• Vowel Phonological Processes Used ________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE
Copyright © 2015 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. Portions of this work were previously published.
Warning: No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,
recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without the express written permission of the copyright owner.
Pearson, PSI Design, PsychCorp, KLPA, Q-global, and Q-interactive are trademarks, in the U.S. and/or other countries, of Pearson Education, Inc.
or its affiliates.
PsychCorp is an imprint of Pearson Clinical Assessment.
NCS Pearson, Inc., 5601 Green Valley Drive, Bloomington MN 55437
800.627.7271 www.PearsonClinical.com
Printed in the United States of America.
Copyright © 2015 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. This page is reproducible, with copyright notice.
SAMPLE,
Practice]. Available from www.asha.org/policy
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (n.d.). Cultural Competence. (Practice Portal). Retrieved May, 14, 2015,
from www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Cultural-Competence
NOT FOR
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bauman-Waengler, J. (2011). Articulatory and phonological impairments: A Clinical Focus (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson, Inc.
Bernthal, J. E., and Bankson, N. R. (1998). Articulation disorders. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
ADMINISTRATION
Bernthal, J. E., & Bankson, N. W. (2004). Articulation and phonological disorders (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bernthal, J. E., Bankson, N. W., & Flipsen, P., Jr. (2013). Articulation and phonological disorders: Speech sound disorders
in children (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
OR RESALE
Bleile, K. M. (2004). Manual of articulation and phonological disorders: Infancy through adulthood (2nd ed.). Clifton Park,
NY: Thompson Delmar Learning.
Bowers, L., & Huisingh, R. (2010) LinguiSystems articulation test (LAT). East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems.
Bracken, B. A. (1992). The interpretation of tests. In M. Zeidner & R. Most (Eds.), Psychological testing: An inside view (pp.
119–156). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Brennan, R. L. (Ed.). (2006). Educational measurement (4th ed.). Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger Publishers.
Carrigg, B., Baker, E., Parry, L., & Ballard, K. J. (2015). Persistent speech sound disorder in a 22-year-old male:
Communication, educational, socio-emotional, and vocational outcomes. SIG 16 Perspectives on School-Based
Issues, 16, 37–49. doi:10.1044/sbi16.2.37
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, B. H. (1996). Explaining psychological statistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks & Cole.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Daniloff, R., & Moll, K. (1968). Coarticulation of lip rounding. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 707–721.
Davis, B. L. (2005). Goal and target selection for developmental speech disorders. In A. G. Kamhi & K. E. Pollock (Eds.),
Phonological disorders in children: Clinical decision making in assessment and intervention (pp. 89–100). Baltimore,
MD: Brookes.
SAMPLE,
Guilford, J. P., & Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hodson, B. W. (2004). Hodson assessment of phonological patterns (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Hull, F. M., Mielke, P. W., Jr., Willeford, J. A., & Timmons, R. J. (1976). National Speech and Hearing Survey (Final report
NOT FOR
for USOE Project No. 50978, Grant No. OE-32-15-0050-5010 [607]). Washington, DC: Bureau of Education for the
Handicapped (DHEW/OE). (ERIC Document Reproduction Sevice No. ED 129 045)
Johnson, C. J., Beitchman, J. H., & Brownlie, E. B. (2010). Twenty-Year-Follow-Up of Children With and Without Speech-
Language Impairments: Family, Educational, Occupational, and Quality of Life Outcomes. American Journal of
ADMINISTRATION
Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 51–65. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0083)
Johnson, C. J., Beitchman, J. H., Young, A., Escobar, M., Atkinson, L., Wilson, B., . . . Wang, M. (1999). Fourteen-year
follow-up of children with and without speech/language impairments: Speech/language stability outcomes. Journal
OR RESALE
of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(3), 744–760.
Khan, L., & Bird, A. (1983). Guidelines for reporting a phonological process assessment. Texas Journal of Audiology and
Speech Pathology, 9, 6–8.
Khan, L. M. L., & Lewis, N. P. (1986). Khan-Lewis phonological analysis. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Khan, L. M. L., & Lewis, N. P. (2002). Khan-Lewis phonological analysis (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American
Guidance Service.
Kirk, C., & Vigeland, L. (2014). A psychometric review of norm-referenced tests used to assess phonological error
patterns. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 45(4), 365–377.
Law, J., Boyle, J., Harris, F., Harkness, A., & Nye, C. (2000). Prevalence and natural history of primary speech
and language delay: findings from a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Language &
Communication Disorders, 35, 165–188.
Lawrence, C. W. (1992). Assessing the use of age-equivalent scores in clinical management. Language, Speech, and
Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 6–8.
Lewis, B. A., Freebairn, L., Tag, J., Ciesla, A. A., Iyengar, S. K., Stein, C. M., & Taylor, H. G. (2015). Adolescent outcomes
of children with early speech sound disorders with and without language impairment. American Journal of Speech-
Language Pathology, 24, 150–163. doi:10.1044/2014_AJSLP-14-0075
Lewis, N., & Khan, L. (1982, March). Adapting traditional articulation tests for phonological processes analysis.
Paper presented at the regional conference of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Colorado
Springs, CO.
SAMPLE,
Preston, J., & Edwards, M. L. (2010). Phonological awareness and types of sound errors in preschoolers with speech
sound disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 44–60.
Raitano, N. A., Pennington, B. F., Tunick, R. A., Boada, R., & Shriberg, L. D. (2004). Pre-literacy skills of subgroups of
NOT FOR
children with speech sound disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(4), 821–835.
Ruggles, S., Alexander, J. T., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Schroeder, M. B., & Sobek, M. (2010). Integrated public use
microdata series: Version 5.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Rvachew, S. (2007). Phonological processing and reading in children with speech sound disorders. American Journal of
ADMINISTRATION
Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 260–270.
Sattler, J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations (5th ed.). La Mesa, CA: Jerome M. Sattler,
Publisher, Inc.
OR RESALE
Secord, W., & Donohue, J. S. (2014). Clinical assessment of articulation and phonology (2nd ed.). Greenville, SC: Super
Duper Publications.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin,
2, 420–428.
Sices, L., Taylor, H. G, Freebairn, L., Hansen, A., & Lewis, B. (2007). Relationship between speech-sound disorders and
early literacy skills in preschool-age children: Impact on comorbid language impairment. Journal of Developmental
Behavioral Pediatrics, 28(6), 438–447.
Silver, N. C., & Dunlap, W. P. (1987). Averaging correlation coefficients: Should Fisher’s z transformation be used? Journal
of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 146–148.
Strauss, E., Spreen, O., & Hunter, M. (2000). Implications of test revisions for research. Psychological Assessment,
12(3), 237–244.
Strube, M. J. (1998). Some comments on the use of magnitude-of-effect estimates. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
35(3), 342–345.
Wiig, E. H., Secord, W. A., & Semel, E. M. (2004). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals–Preschool (2nd ed.). San
Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
Wiig, E. H., Semel, E. M., & Secord, W. A. (2014). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (5th ed.). Bloomington,
MN: Pearson.
SAMPLE,
NOT FOR
ADMINISTRATION
OR RESALE