Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Biotransformation of Agricultural
Waste and By-Products
The Food, Feed, Fibre, Fuel (4F) Economy
Edited by
Palmiro Poltronieri
CNR-ISPA, Lecce, Italy
Oscar Fernando D’Urso
Bioesplora srl, San Michele Salentino, Brindisi, Italy
v
Contents
vi
Contents
vii
Contents
ix
Contents
x
Contents
xi
This page intentionally left blank
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 World production and world price indices (value 2000=100)
(Database FAO/OECD Agricultural Outlook 2014–2023). 2
Figure 1.2 Asparagus waste. 3
Figure 1.3 Garlic residues. 3
Figure 1.4 Green bean by-products. 4
Figure 1.5 By-product calendar of subproducts available in the Ebro valley (Spain)
(Personal communication with TRASA S.L.). 5
Figure 1.6 Transport costs of waste and by-products versus transport distance
(AWARENET).7
Figure 2.1 Central American major crops produced in the period 2009–2013.
Sugar cane data reported against secondary axis. 26
Figure 2.2 Flow diagram of the preparation of bananas to be used as carbon
source in lactic acid fermentation process. 42
Figure 4.1 Organic matter transformation into humus, biomass, and minerals. 78
Figure 4.2 Example of composting process (AP Business Technology Consultancy). 81
Figure 4.3 Typical temperature and acidity profile during composting. 82
Figure 4.4 Open air windrow system. 85
Figure 4.5 A fully automated turning machine. 86
Figure 4.6 Schematic overview of turning of table composting piles. 86
Figure 4.7 Drum composting reactor (DTEnvironmental). 87
Figure 4.8 The four steps in the anaerobic digestion process. 92
Figure 4.9 Evolution of biogas production on byproducts before bioproduct
extraction.118
Figure 4.10 Evolution of the biogas production of sweet corn before and after
bioproduct extraction. 119
Figure 4.11 Evolution of the biogas production of potato waste before and after
bioproduct extraction. 120
Figure 5.1 Structure of cellulose molecule. 127
Figure 5.2 Hydrogen bonds between cellulose polymer chains. 128
Figure 5.3 Structure of hemicellulose. 129
Figure 5.4 p-coumaryl-, coniferyl-, and sinapyl alcohol, building blocks of lignin. 130
Figure 6.1 Feedstock biomass options for production of ethanol, fuels,
and valuable chemicals. 164
Figure 6.2 Prospects of transformation of municipal solid wastes in Europe
into ethanol and fuels. 171
xiii
List of Figures
xiv
List of Figures
xv
This page intentionally left blank
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Vegetable Waste Amount in 2012. 4
Table 1.2 Valuable Compounds From Fruit and Vegetable Biomass. 12
Table 1.3 Currently Used Carbohydrate Carbon Sources in Industrial Fermentation. 15
Table 2.1 Main Seven Exported Fruits Form Costa Rica for the Year 2014, Expressed
in Thousands of US Dollars and in Tons. 23
Table 2.2 Agricultural Production in Tons for Central American Countries
in the Year 2013. 26
Table 2.3 Physicochemical Composition of Cultivated and Exported Fruits
From Costa Rica and Central America. 31
Table 2.4 Vitamin C Content (mg/100 g) of the Main Cultivated Fruits in Costa Rica
and Central America. 32
Table 2.5 Phenolic Compounds Content (mg GAE/100 g) of the Main Cultivated Fruits. 34
Table 2.6 Antioxidant Capacity Assessed by ORAC Method (TE Micromol/g) of the
Traditional Tropical Fruits. 35
Table 2.7 Composition of Green Coffee of Varieties Arabica and Robusta, Produced
in Mexico. 36
Table 2.8 Physicochemical Characterization of Pomegranate Seeds and Husk
in g/100 g of Fruit Produced in Mexico. 38
Table 3.1 Potential of Mango Waste Components. 51
Table 4.1 Recycling Targets for Biodegradable Waste as Prescribed by the Landfill
Directive.71
Table 4.2 Main Characteristics of Some Biodegradable Materials. 79
Table 4.3 Duration of Some Industrial Composting Processes (Large-scale Compost;
Deyerling & Fuchs; Productie Van Compost; Offaly). 82
Table 4.4 Levels of Rottegrad Based on the Potential Heating Ability of Compost. 83
Table 4.5 Overview Baumuster Composting Categories. 84
Table 4.6 Theoretical Amounts of Methane in Biogas. 93
Table 4.7 Analysis Results of Biogas Potential Tests on Byproducts Before Bioproduct
Extraction.117
Table 4.8 Analysis Results of Sweet Corn Products. 118
Table 4.9 Analysis Results of Potato Products. 119
Table 5.1 Effect of Various Pretreatments Methods on Composition of Lignocellulosic
Biomass.132
Table 5.2 List of Main Biorefinery Facilities, Status and Pretreatment Strategies. 150
Table 6.1 Content in Fatty Acids of Some Tobacco Varieties Selected. 180
xvii
List of Tables
Table 6.2 Characteristics of the Tobacco Oil Obtained by Pressing the Seed and
Filtering.181
Table 7.1 Main Characteristics of SSF Bioreactors. 203
Table 7.2 Differences Between Solid-State (SSF) and Submerged Liquid Fermentation
(SmF).214
Table 8.1 Worldwide Production of Bioethanol. 226
Table 9.1 Demonstration-Scale Facilities for the Production of Biobased Succinic Acid. 240
Table 9.2 Main Metabolic Engineering Strategies to Improve Succinate Production
in Different Yeast Species. 249
Table 9.3 General Steps in Downstream Processing, Highlighting Common
Principles and Unit Operations as well as the Respective Desired
Outcome of Each Step. 256
Table 11.1 Impact Assessment Methods Used in the International Life Cycle
Data System Midpoint Method. 293
Table 12.1 List of Genetically Modified Crops Cultivated Around the World. 311
Table 12.2 Genetically Modified Crops Approved in European Union. 312
xviii
List of Abbreviations
xix
List of Abbreviations
xx
List of Abbreviations
xxi
This page intentionally left blank
About the Editors
Palmiro Poltronieri is researcher at the Agri-Food Department of the National Research
Council, Italy. He holds a PhD in Molecular and Cellular Biology and Pathology, obtained
from Verona University in 1995. In 1996–1997, he was Japanese Society for Promotion of
Science postdoctoral fellow at University of Tsukuba, Japan. Since 1999, as a researcher at
the Institute of Sciences of Food Productions, he studied plant protease inhibitors and their
applications, and plant signaling in response to abiotic stresses in legumes. He is cofounder
of Biotecgen Company, involved in several European projects, and has supported as supervisor
the biotech company, Bioesplora. He is associate editor to BMC Research Notes and editor-
in-chief of the journal Challenges, MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Dr. Oscar Fernando D’Urso obtained a BSc in Biological Science in 2005 from the Univer-
sity of Salento and a PhD in Physiology in 2010. For 6 years, he has been the head of the
laboratory at Biotecgen in Lecce, Italy. He founded a small company, Bioesplora, San Michele
Salentino, Italy, in 2011, working in the field of novel diagnostic kits. Bioesplora counts on two
divisions: biotechnology and engineering. Bioesplora’s core business relies on molecular
biology services, and in the development and commercialization of microelectronics and
electronics devices. Bioesplora has a strong expertise in the development of microarray and
real-time-based protocol in clinical and environmental fields.
xxiii
This page intentionally left blank
About the Contributors
Cristóbal Noé Aguilar González is Dean of the School of Chemistry at Universidad
Autónoma de Coahuila, México. He is Chemist (1992) by the Universidad Autónoma de
Coahuila (Mexico); his MSc Program in Food Science and Biotechnology (1995) was held
in the Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, México. His PhD program in Fermentation
Biotechnology (2000) was developed in the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico.
He was working on a postdoc in Biotechnology and Molecular Microbiology (2001) in the
IRD, Marseille, France. Dr. Aguilar has published more than 130 papers published in indexed
journals, more than 35 articles in Mexican journals; 16 book chapters, 8 Mexican books,
4 editions of international books, 34 proceedings, and more than 250 contributions in scientific
meetings. Dr. Aguilar is a member, Level III of SNI (Mexican National System of Researchers)
from 1998, receiving several prizes and awards, among which the most important are:
National Prize of Research 2010 of the Mexican Academy of Sciences, the prize “Carlos
Casas Campillo” (2008) of the Mexican Society of Biotechnology and Bioengineering,
National Agro-Bio Prize (2005), and the Mexican Prize in Food Science and Technology.
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT)-Coca Cola México, 2003. Prof.
Aguilar has developed more than 21 research projects, including 4 international exchange
projects Evaluation-orientation de la COopération Scientifique Nord (ECOS-Nord), alpha
network European Project; Marie Curie European project for mobility of researchers. He has
been advisor of 13 PhD theses, 19 MSc theses, and 40 BSc theses. He is now a regular
member of the Mexican Academy of Science (2014).
xxv
About the Contributors
She is an expert in fermentation processes for the valorization of bioactive molecules from
agroindustrial by-products. She has experience in isolation of native strains with biotechnological
potential and has developed solid state fermentation processes for the production, isolation,
and characterization of biomolecules with enzymatic, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and
hypoglycemic activities. Dr. Prado has been awarded the “Sergio Sanchez-Esquivel” prize by
the Mexican Society of Biotechnology and Bioengineering (2009), has been recognized for
the desirable profile for full-time teachers by the Ministry of Education Programa Mejoramiento
del Profesorado (PROMEP), and belongs to the National System of Researchers, Level II
(SNI). She is member of the Commission on Graduate Biotechnology, a member of the
Mexican Society of Biotechnology and Bioengineering; she belongs to the Research Group of
Bioprocess, Fermentations and Natural Products; and she is the Coordinator of the Editorial
Committee of Biological Science Faculty (UAM-I) for the development of textbooks and
teaching materials.
José Juan Buenostro Figueroa is a food engineer. He obtained Master’s and doctoral (2008)
degrees in Food Science and Technology by the Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila and
accomplished postdoctoral research at the Biotechnology Department of the Universidad
Autonoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa. He is coauthor of 2 bioprocess patents, 16 indexed
papers, and 28 contributions in scientific events, a member of Mexican Society of Biotechnology
and Bioengineering, and belongs to the Research Group of Bioprocess, Fermentations and
Natural Products.
Ana Carolas is lab leader and fermentation scientist at Biotrend. She holds an MSc in Biological
Engineering (University of Lisbon, Portugal) and has performed research at NIZO Food
Research BV, Ede, The Netherlands. Ana oversees all fermentation trials at Biotrend and has an
impressive experience of having personally run hundreds of fermentation trials in controlled
bioreactors with diversified biological systems, including yeasts, bacteria, and filamentous fungi.
Steven De Meester holds a Master’s in Bioscience Engineering with a specialization in
Environmental Technology at Ghent University. After his Master’s, he worked with a PhD
fellowship at Ghent University on the use and development of the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA)
methodology in the biorefinery sector, and has now a PhD degree. He is author or coauthor of
several scientific articles on environmental sustainability assessment. Within Organic Waste
Systems (OWS), he worked as Sustainability Assessment Services project manager and is
currently working at Environmental Organic Chemistry and Technology (EnVOC) group at
Ghent University, Belgium.
Thomas Dietrich is an engineer in biotechnology, and project manager and researcher at
Tecnalia Research & Innovation (Spain) in the area of bioprocesses and food ingredients. He
participated in several European-funded research projects and coordinated the biomass
valorization projects HELICAS and TRANSBIO. After receiving his engineering degree from
Technical University of Berlin (Germany) in 2000, he started his career as project manager in
xxvi
About the Contributors
ttz Bremerhaven (Germany). In November 2004, he took over the responsibility for the
bioprocess engineering group at the food department of ttz. In the end of 2011, he moved to
the applied research center LEIA CDT (Spain), mainly working in projects related to food
ingredients and preservation, as well as utilization of microalgae for different approaches.
Additionally, he coordinated the European project AIRTV, aiming at environmental technology
verification of air emission abatement technologies, and was involved in EU projects:
FERMATEC, continuous bioreactor for bioethanol; CRUSTAMEL, preventing browning
(melanosis) of shrimps; FISHNOSE, electronic nose to detect quality of smoked fish,
SO2SAY, prevention of polyphenol oxidase-induced browning in fruits and vegetables; and
BreadGuard. Since 2011, he is part of Tecnalia, working in biomass valorization as well as
new sensor systems for food applications.
Pedro J. Echeverría is an agronomist engineer; his degree was obtained at U.P.N.A University
in Navarra, Spain. He is Occupational Safety and Health Senior Technician, and Master’s in
Environmental Management Engineering. He has more than 15 years of experience in the
agro-alimentary sector, basically devoted to the technical, environmental, and the R&D areas.
Between 1999 and 2007, he worked in different projects related to enterprise management,
always within the scope of CONSEBRO (enterprise association of agro-alimentary industries
that has a unit of services of enterprise management), and since 2008, he is Technical Director
of the company TRASA, Tratamiento de Subproductos Agroalimentarios, San Adriàn, Navarra,
Spain. The aim of the company is the treatment and valorization of subproducts from the
agro-food sector. During these last years, he participated in several R&D projects in
collaboration with other companies, technological centers, and universities related to the
remainders/agro-alimentary by-products and their possibilities of valorization (BISOSTAD,
CARBIO, VALBIO, VALSOST+).
Bruno Sommer Ferreira is co-founder and CEO of the BIOTREND company, located in
Cantanhede, Portugal, specializing in bioprocess development, optimization, and scale-up,
and he is co-founder of Silicolife, a leading computational biology company. He was visiting
scientist at the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto,
Canada, and researcher at the Center for Biological and Chemical Engineering, Technical
University of Lisbon, Portugal. Bruno holds a PhD in Biotechnology, University of Lisbon,
and an MSc in Chemical Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal. Bruno has been
Vice-President of the Portuguese Bioindustries Association. He is a member of the expert
panel of ERA-Net Industrial Biotechnology and has contributed to advisory groups for the
Portuguese Government, the European Commission, and the OECD on the topic of the
bioeconomy. He advises public and private initiatives aiming to bridge the gap between
biotechnology research and commercial applications.
xxvii
About the Contributors
xxviii
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Dead Authors
“Les morts n’écrivent point,” said Madame de Maintenon, who
lived in a day of tranquil finalities. If men’s passions and vanities
were admittedly strong until the hour of dissolution, the finger of
death obliterated all traces of them; and the supreme dignity of this
obliteration sustained noble minds and solaced the souls that
believed. An age which produced the Oraisons Funèbres had an
unquenchable reverence for the grave.
Echoes of Madame de Maintenon’s soothing conviction ring
pleasantly through the intervening centuries. Book-making, which
she knew only in its smiling infancy, had grown to ominous
proportions when the Hon. Augustine Birrell, brooding over the
fatality which had dipped the world in ink, comforted himself—and us
—with the vision of an authorless future. “There were no books in
Eden,” he said meditatively, “and there will be none in Heaven; but
between times it is otherwise.”
For an Englishman more or less conversant with ghosts, Mr. Birrell
showed little foreknowledge of their dawning ambitions. If we may
judge by the recent and determined intrusion of spirits into
authorship, Heaven bids fair to be stacked with printing-presses.
One of their number, indeed, the “Living Dead Man,” whose
amanuensis is Elsa Barker, and whose publishers have
unhesitatingly revealed (or, I might perhaps say, announced) his
identity, gives high praise to a ghostly library, well catalogued, and
containing millions of books and records. Miss Lilian Whiting assures
us that every piece of work done in life has its ethereal counterpart.
“The artist creates in the astral before he creates in the material, and
the creation in the astral is the permanent embodiment.”
Consequently, when an author dies, he finds awaiting him an
“imperishable record” of all he has ever written. Miss Whiting does
not tell us how she comes to know this. Neither does she say how
good a book has to be to live forever in the astral, or if a very bad
book is never suffered to die a natural and kindly death as in our
natural and kindly world. Perhaps it is the ease with which astral
immortality is achieved, or rather the impossibility of escaping it,
which prompts ambitious and exclusive spirits to force an entrance
into our congested literary life, and compete with mortal scribblers
who ask their little day.
The suddenness of the attack, and its unprecedented character,
daunt and bewilder us. It is true that the apparitions that lend vivacity
to the ordinary spiritualistic séance have from time to time written
short themes, or dropped into friendly verse. Readers of that
engaging volume, “Report of the Seybert Commission for
Investigating Modern Spiritualism,” published in 1887, will remember
that “Belle,” who claimed to be the original proprietor of Yorick’s skull
(long a “property” of the Walnut Street Theatre, Philadelphia, but at
that time in the library of Dr. Horace Howard Furness), voiced her
pretensions, and told her story, in ten carefully rhymed stanzas.
Also that “It isn’t always the parsons that go highest first,” and that
“It isn’t what you’ve professed; it’s what you’ve done.” Something of
this kind we have long suspected. Something of this kind has long
been hinted from the plain pulpits of the world.
I fear it is the impatience of the human mind, the hardness of the
human heart, which make us restless under too much preaching.
Volume after volume of “messages” have been sent to us by spirits
during the last few years. There is no fault to be found with any of
them, and that sad word, “uplifting,” may well apply to all. Is it
possible that, when we die, we shall preach to one another; or is it
the elusiveness of ghostly audiences which drives determined
preachers to the ouija board? The somewhat presumptuous title, “To
Walk With God,” which Mrs. Lane and Mrs. Beale have given to their
volume of revelations, was, we are told, commanded by the spirit
who dictated it. “Stephen,” the dead soldier who stands responsible
for the diffuse philosophy of “Our Unseen Guest,” dedicates the book
to the “wistful” questioners who seek enlightenment at his hands.
“Anne Simon,” a transcendental spirit with a strong bias for
hyphenated words, sends her modest “Message,” dictated through
her husband, to “world-mortals for their regeneration.”
How lightly that tremendous word, “regeneration,” is bandied about
by our ghostly preceptors. Mr. Basil King, in “The Abolishing of
Death,” reports the spirit of Henry Talbot, the distinguished Boston
chemist, as saying, “My especial mission is to regenerate the world.”
It is a large order. The ungrateful but always curious mortal who
would like a few practical hints about chemistry, is told instead that
“grief is unrhythmical,” which proves that Mr. Talbot never read “In
Memoriam”; or finds himself beset by figurative phrases. “Literature
is the sun, music is the water, sculpture is the earth, dancing is life,
and painting is the soul. These in their purity can never be evil. I
have spread a table in your sight. Whatever is on it is for your use.
Take freely, and give it to others. They hunger for the food.”
For what do we hunger? For any word which will help us on our
hard but interesting way, any word which is wise, or practically
useful, or beautiful. It has been revealed to Mr. King that poets as
splendid as Homer and Shakespeare bloom in the spirit world. Why,
in the general assault by dead authors, are they the silent ones?
Could they not give us one good play, one good lyric, one good
sonnet, just to show a glint of their splendour? What is wrong with
psychic currents that they bear nothing of value? “Stephen,” the
“Unseen Guest,” assures us that many a man we call a genius
“simply puts into words the thoughts of some greater mentality in the
other life.” But this is not adding to our store. It is trying to take away
from us the merit of what we have. “Anne Simon” reads the riddle
thus: “In earth-proximity the spirit leaves behind him his efficacy, for
the time, of Heaven-emanation; so it is better to open the heart, and
wish the larger beneficence than to visualize the spirit-form. For the
spirit-form without its spirit-treasure does not bring the mortal to the
higher places.”
Which, though not wholly intelligible, is doubtless true.
If we do not get what we hunger for, what is it we receive?
Professor Hyslop once assured me that the authorship of “Jap
Herron” was “proved beyond question.” This contented him, but
dismayed me. The eclipse of the “merry star” which danced above
Mark Twain’s cradle, and which shone on him fitfully through life,
suggests direful possibilities in the future. It is whispered that O.
Henry is busily dictating allegories and tracts; that Dickens may yet
reveal “The Mystery of Edwin Drood”; that Washington Irving has
loomed on the horizon of an aspiring medium. The publication of
“Shakespeare’s Revelations, by Shakespeare’s Spirit: A Soul’s
Record of Defeat,” adds a touch of fantastic horror to the situation.
The taste of the world, like the sanity of the world, has seemingly
crashed into impotence.
Patience Worth is fortunate in so far that she has no earlier
reputation at stake. In fact, we are informed that three of her stories
are told in “a dialect which, taken as a whole, was probably never
spoken, and certainly never written. Each seems to be a composite
of dialect words and idioms of different periods and different
localities.” It is Mr. Yost’s opinion, however, that her long historical
novel, “The Sorry Tale,” is composed “in a literary tongue somewhat
resembling the language of the King James version of the Bible in
form and style, but with the unmistakable verbal peculiarities of
Patience Worth.” “What bringeth thee asearch?” and “Who hath the
trod of the antelope?” are doubtless verbal peculiarities; but for any
resemblance to the noble and vigorous lucidity of the English Bible
we may search in vain through the six hundred and forty closely
printed pages of this confused, wandering, sensuous, and wholly
unreadable narrative, which purports to tell the life-history of the
penitent thief. I quote a single paragraph, snatched at random from
the text, which may serve as a sample of the whole:
“And within, upon the skins’-pack, sat Samuel, who listed him, and
lo, the jaws of him hung ope. And Jacob wailed, and the Jew’s
tongue of him sounded as the chatter of fowls, and he spake of the
fool that plucked of his ass that he save of down. Yea, and walked
him at the sea’s edge, and yet sought o’ pools. And he held aloft
unto the men who hung them o’er the bin’s place handsful of brass
and shammed precious stuffs, and cried him out.”
Six hundred and forty pages of this kind of writing defy a patient
world. And we are threatened with “the larger literature to come”!
“Hope Trueblood,” Patience Worth’s last novel, is written in
intelligible English, as is also the greater part of her verse. The story
deals with the doubtful legitimacy of a little girl in an English village
which has lived its life along such straight lines that the mere
existence of a bastard child, or a child thought to be a bastard, rocks
it to its foundations, and furnishes sufficient matter for violent and
heart-wounding scenes from the first chapter to the last. It is difficult
to follow the fortunes of this child (who might have been the great
original devil baby of Hull House for the pother she creates) because
of the confusion of the narrative, and because of the cruelly high
pitch at which all emotions are sustained; but we gather that the
marriage lines are at last triumphantly produced, and that the village
is suffered to relapse into the virtuous somnolence of earlier days.
Mr. Yost, who has edited all of Patience Worth’s books, and who is
perhaps a partial critic, praises her poems for their rare individuality.
We may search in vain, he says, through literature for anything
resembling them. “They are alike in the essential features of all
poetry, and yet they are unalike. There is something in them that is
not in other poetry. In the profusion of their metaphor there is an
etherealness that more closely resembles Shelley, perhaps, than any
other poet; but the beauty of Shelley’s poems is almost wholly in
their diction; there is in him no profundity of thought. In these poems
there is both beauty and depth,—and something else.”
Whatever this “something else” may be, it is certainly not rhyme or
rhythm. The verses brook no bondage, but run loosely on with the
perilous ease of enfranchisement. For the most part they are of the
kind which used to be classified by compilers as “Poems of Nature,”
and “Poems of Sentiment and Reflection.” Spring, summer, autumn,
and winter are as inspirational for the dead as for the living.
MARTINI LUIGI
Implora pace.
LUCREZIA PICINI
Implora eterna quiete.