Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3336

1

I.
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

II.
11. ,

12. ()

13.

14. -

15.
16. -

17.

18.

III.
19.

20. :

21. :

22. :

23. : -

24. :

25. ,

26.

2
27.

28.

29.
30.

31.

32.

IV.
33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

40. -

41.

42.

43. :
-

44.

45.
46.

47.

48.

3
49. -

50.

51. ,

52.

53.

54.

55.

56.

57. , VIIa

V.
58.

59.

60.
61.

62.

63.

64.

65. ,

66.

67.

68.

69.

70.

71.

72.

73.

4
74. :

75. , ,

76.

77.
78.

79.

80. :

VI.
81.

82.

83.

84.

VII.
85.

86.

87.

88.

89.

90.

VIII.
91.

92.

93.

94.

95.

96.

97. - :

98.

IX.
99.

100.

101. ,

102.
Merlin D. Larson
..
..


1. 6. ,
, ,
.
. 7.
2. ,
.
16 1846. 8.
3. ,
, . ,
4. , .
. , ,
,
5.
.
,

.

, , ,
, - ,
. - ,
, , , ,
.
, -
, , - ,
, , - 1925 1960 .
, ,
. -
- ,
, .
. .,
, XIX.
, - ,
, -
. -
- . -
-
, .
William T.G. Morton (1819-1868) 1846 .1,2 . -
, - , , , , ,
. , , , ,
- , , , ,
, , , , , -
-
. 1846 . .

3
I 4

,
. , .4 Richard Lower
- (1631-1691) , -
, - 1669 . ,
, - ,
- -
. , ,
.5
Joseph Priestley (1733-1804) (. 1-1)
: -
- , , -
. , -
6. ,
, -
, .
, - ,
150 , - . , , -
, , -
. - ,
, .
,
400 . .
,
. Carl Scheele7 (1742-1786) ,
- , feuer luft (
, , - ),
. . ,
(384-322 . ..)
(120-200 . ..) , , - AntoineLaurent Lavoisier
, , (1743-1794) (. 1-1B). -
.3 :
1678 . Robert Hook (1635-1703) .
- ,
, , -
. , Humphry Davy (1778-1829) (. 1-1C), -
- 16 ,

A B C
. 1-1 , , , . , . 1780 .
.
. 1789. - .
, , 1804. 70 . B,
1788 . , 14 .
.. ;
. . C, , , 17
. . . 20
, , .
A . , 1818., 40 , . ( Wood Library-useum of Anes-
thesiology, Park Ridge, IL.)
5 1
,
-
. , -
, ,
,
(.. ).
,
1930 1960 ., -
.
-
,

(PCO2).
PCO2
Donald D. Van Slyke15 (1883-1971) Paul B.
Astrup (1915-2000),

I
. -
1958., John W. Severinghaus (.
1922) (. . 1-2)
. 1-2 , , Richard Stow (. 1916).
, ()
1982 .
, -
( Severinghaus JW, Astrup PB: History of blood gas analysis. Int Anesthesiol
Clin 25:1-224, 1987.) ,
, ,
.
, A.F. Bradley16 (. 1932)
. -
. ,
, , 37.
, .8 PO2 -
- , -
, , -
. . 1959.
John S. Haldane (1860-1936) -. -
. 1892. - -
.9 , .

,10 1905. , - -
- , . John Nunn
.11 Applied Respiratory Physiology
-
, .17
- .
: -
, . . -
, , .
, , ,
. 1922 . - :
Respiration12, . 1942 .
. Glenn Millikan (1906-1947),
XIX . , , , -
. -
. 1896 . Carl Gustav von Hufner (1840-1908) ,
,
, 1 .
1,34 .13 - , , -
, - -
Takuo Aoyagi (. 1936).18

,
. , -
. 1953. Leland C. ,
Clark (. 1918) (. 1-2) 14 Nellcor, 1983. -
,
- , , -
, . . A
I 6

Stephen
Hales (1677-1761) (. 1-3), ,
, -
.
,19 1733. ,
, -
:

.
,
.

,
, , -
A ; -
, .
,
.

, -
, -
.
,
. 1828. Jean
L. Poiseuille20 (1799-1869) -
,
, -
, .
, -
.
1854. Karl Vierordt21 (1818-1884) -
, ,
B
,
.
. 1-3 . , (1677-1761): 1896. Scipione RivaRocci (1863-1937)22
, 1759, , -
, . -
, , 1703 .
, .
,
, (.. . 1905 . 23
) (.. ) (1874-1920) , -
, 1773. ,
. , . , ,
. ,
. B, -
(1708-1777): . , . 1931 . H. von
. Recklinghausen
, .
Physiological Elements of the Human Body,
1757 1766 . ,
,
, .24 1970- .
, 600 , -
. .
1753 . ,
52000 . ( National Library of
Medicine, Bethesda, MD.)
.
-
-
, 50 Sven
Seldinger,
.25 1929. Werner Forssman
(1904-1979), -,

A 26. . 1956.
7 1

. ,37 ,
27 (98-138),
(sym pathos ). Claude
. , Bernard (1813-1878)

, ( )
, , - ,
. 1970 . -
- .38
, , - 1889 . John N. Langley (1852-1925)
.28 -
. ,
29 (Adolf , -
E. Fick, 1829-1901).
- .39 , -

I
- , , ,
1918. Ernest H. Starling (1866-1927), - .40
1897 . John J. Abel41 (1837-1938)
. -
1976. - *.
()30, - ,
. -
, - .
, , - Thomas R. Elliott (1877-1961) , -
-, -
, ,
65- , - -
.31 - .42 George Barger (1878-1939) Henry H.
Dale (1875-1968) -
,
, -
, .43 Walter B. Cannon (1871-1945) Ulf Svante von
.32 1980- . Euler (1905-1983) -

- -.
- , -
.33 , -
, ,
, , .
1907 . Walter E. Dixon44 (1871-1931) ,
. -
-,
. . ,
-
,
. 1914. 45 -
,
,

, Walter H.
, - Gaskell46 (1847-1914) -
- ,
, XVIII . 1751 . Robert Whytt .
(1714-1766) -
.34 -
, 1657., Thomas Willis35 (1621-1675) - Otto Loewi (1873-1961).
. , -
-
. .47
Pourfour du Petit (1664-1741) , - ,
, ,
, .47
.36 Jacob B. Winslow
* . ..
(1669-1760) -
: 1857-1938. : https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/,_
, , _ (. . .)
A
I 8

, - . -
, . ,
1936 . -
- . 1846. -
. Ascanio Sobrero (1812-1888)
1900. Theodore Tuffier (1857-1929) - -
. -
. (1833-1896),
, , ,
, - , , -
.48 -
. -
G. Smith W. Porter 1915 .49 , , ,
, , 1901.57,58 1879.
- William Murrell59 (1853-1912) -
-
. Gaston L. Labat50 (1877-1934) - .

, , -
. -
- , 30
,
: -
, 1914. .45 1931. .60 1986 . Ferid Murad (. 1936)
,51 ,
-
- .61 , ,
, , - , , -
. , ,
.52 , - -
Atropa belladonna A. Mein53 1831., - : 5 10
.62
. 1960. -
,
.54
;

-
, -
- . XIX . ,

- ,
, -
, ,
. 1948 . Raymond P. . , XX. -
Ahlquist (1914-1983) - ,
- ,55 ,
. 1985. .
- , .
. - -
- ,
. 1976. , . -
, -
- - . - . *
, 2- , poinh (). -
, - , ,
. , ,
2-
, . ,
- ,
. ,
- . -
, -
.56 .3

A , - * . pain(. . .)
9 1
XVIII XIX . ,
. Albrecht von (.. -
Haller63 (1708-1777) (. . 1-3B) , ), ,
, , ,
: - 72
, -
. .
: , - 1974 . A. Goldstein73, ,
, . 1975 . J. Hughes74 1977 . S.H. Snyder .75
: -
, - , ,
. 1752. ,
:64 - . -
, , , ,
. ,
,

I
, Charles .
Bell65 (1774-1842) Franois Magendie66 (1783-1855),
, - . -
,
. . -
1826. Johannes Mller (1801-1858) Of ,76 -
the Peculiar Properties of Individual Nerves -
,
, , . -
; , - , -
,
.67 , , ,
, , ,
- ,
-, 1858 . Moritz S. Schiff -
(1823-1896). .
XIX . -
, - .
, -
. - .77
,
,

. , 1846.
,

.68 ,
, , . ,
, , , , , ,
, . . (460-377 . ..)
, -
( ) . -
, -
. ; , -
. .78 -
,
, (40-90 . ..),
, . 77 . .. Materia
, Medica 15
.69 Henry Beecher70 (1904- .
1976) , ,
.
.
,
1965. Ronald Melzack ,
(. 1929) P.D. Wall , .3
.71 , -

(. 1-4). -
. , A
I 10

A B
. 1-4 A, Chirurgia . ,
, . , XIX.
, .
, . B,
. , , ,
.. 16 1846. (. . 1-6)

. ,3 , ,
IX ., -
, : 1518.
,
, , ,
: -
. : - . -
, - 79 (1752-1840),
, , XIX .
. - , -
- 30 1811.
. , .
, (1766-1842):
,
. , , -
, , . ,
. . ,
. .
!.. , -
, , ,
(1205-1296), .
, , , ,
. ,
, ,
.3 .
,
(. . ,
1-4). 29 ,
, - , , ,
(1493-1541), . ,
, - , , -
(1515-1544) ,
. - -
- . ,
, 1740. (. ., -
ignite blaze*. - ,80
, , , ,
- , ,
. - .
, -
A * (. . .) , ,
11 1
, , -
. , , - . 1801.
,
, ,
. ,
, - . 20 ,
- , -
1846.81
, , ,
, , , . -
1812., 1820.
, -

. -
, , -
.

I
, (1791-1867), -
,
, ,
, .84
,
-
, , -
, - , , . Henry
Hill Hickman (1800-1830)
. , - ,
, . .
, XIX. XIX .
- , ,
, .
, , , .
, 50%. ,
, 16 1846. , -
, , .. . ,
- 1824.
. .. ,85
, . ,
.


, -
, . - -
, Gardner Quincy Colton
, (1814-1898) (. 1-5A). , 2
. , -x
, .
, , Thomas Beddoes82
(1760-1808) , 2
- ,
.
Joseph Black .
, 10 1844 . , -
Samuel Latham Mitchill (1764-1831) , ,
, , -
. .
Horace Wells (1815-1848) ,
-
, . 22 . -
, , .
. 1800. , .
: , , - ,
, ,
. ,
, , , ,
.83 . A
I 12

A B

. 1-5 , . , . - .
, ..
. . , , 84 . B, ..
1819 . , .
, 1842. .
. , ,
. .
, , .
, . 1844 .,
. , . , ,
16 1846.
.
, 1868. ( Wood LibraryMuseum of Anesthesiology, Park Ridge,IL.)

. -
. , - -
, . -
, - John M. Riggs
, , . Charles A. Jackson.
, ,
, .
, . -
, ,
, , ,
- . ,

. 30 1846.
.
, ,
. -
. Henry J. Bigelow (1818-1890), -
, ,
. . ,
. ,

. .
.. .
(. . 1-5) , 16 1846 .
, , -
. - ,
, , , - .
. , , , -
- , .
, , -
. - , 68-
John Collins Warren (1778-1856).
. ,
, , ,
A , -
13 1

. 1-6 , .. (Rices Trials of a Public Benefactor),


I
16 1846 .
: . (1818-1890), -
.. ; -
, . 1-7 .
, Boston Medical and Surgical Journal; . (Bigelow HJ: Insensibility During Surgi-
. , ; cal Operations Produced by Inhalation. Boston Med Surg J 35:309-317, 382, 1846)
( ( Wood LibraryMuseum of Anesthesiology, Park Ridge, IL.)
); (1811-
1867),
. ( . -
; [ ]
, -*, ,

30 1846 .) . ,
(1778-1856), 68- , -
, ; .. , - . 3
1846 .
; 28- -
, ; -
, , 18 1846 .
, 53- (. 1-7) Boston Medical and Surgical Journal.86 -
(1791-1863), , 17 (. an esthesia )
1846., . -
-
Oliver Wendell Holmes (1809-1894)
. . , , 21 1846.
. (-
Wood LibraryMuseum of Anesthesiology, Park Ridge, IL.) : , , -
* . , ; , ,
, (Charles F. Heywood)
-, 14
, ,
1846. - , ,
. .
. :
www.med-practic.com (. . .)

, , -
. ,
-
. - ,
, -
, -
, , , ,
. - . 63 ,
, -
, James Robinson (1813-1862)
, . 13- .
, ,
, - , , Francis Boott
- (1792-1863).
(. 1-6). (1786-1879), ,
, . -
, ,
. ,
, - 1 1847.87 ,
. ,
- Robert Liston (1794-1847) A
I 14

,
, -
. . -
, -
. , ,
(1810-1881) ,
1847 .; , -
. . ,
-
, - ,
. ,
, .
,
, , .
. . , 1848 . , ,
,
, -
, . . ,
,
. - -
, .
, 49 .
. - , 68 ,
, - , 7 .
. , 27 ,
- . -
.88 - :
, (1815-1848) 29 ; (1778-1829) 22 ;
, (1800-1830) 24; (1804-1880)
, 41 ; (1815-1878) 27 ,
, . (1814-1898) 30 .




. , .
, -
.
, ,
, , -
1842. 1849. Crawford , -
Long (1815-1878) Southern Medical , -
and Surgical Journal, - ,
30 1842. , .
James M. Venable.89 -
, , , , ,
. , ,
, 15 , ,
, . , , -
, . , , James Young
Pilgrim Memorial Hall Simpson (1811-1870) 1846., ,
, , : -
1842 ., , . . 1847. -
.
, .90
, - Marie Jean Flourens (1794-1867) -
, - , -
. 4 1847.
, . Man , -
Against Pain Howard R. Raper . -
, , ,
, - . ,
, . ,
1842. - , . -
A , - ,
15 1
.
, . ,
, , 91, - 1844 . .
. ,
- .
, 1844., ,
, ,
, ,
, -
. , .
, . ,
1591 .
.
. , ,
, Boston Transcript.95
VI (1567-1625). , 1863.

I
- Joseph H. Smith,
, - , , -
: ; , . , 1864
, 1897 .
( , 2, 21). 200000 .
1867.
,
, - , -
, . ,
- , .

, -
, (1888 1890 .)92. . ,
XIX . , :96
, -
, -
. , ,
,
.
. ,
. -
Edward Lawrie (1846-1915). - 15-20 .
, -
.
, 1870. -
, - , -
. : , , -
, - ? -
1894., Leonard G. Guthrie93
- Edmund Andrews97 (1824-1904),
. - -
, -
, A. Goodman Levy94 . ,
(1856-1954). , ,
- , , ..,
, ,
,
, - .
,
. .
Paul Bert (1833-1886)

. ,
-
,
1863 .* , - 1 -
, - . Frederick Hewitt98 (1857-1916) -
,
* .
. ,
1844., 1848. (.
. . .) , , , A
I 16

, - . -
Christopher L. Hewer104 (1896-1986) -
, , ,
- , , -
0,5% .99 -
,
, , - -
, - . ,
. .
-
Elmer I. McKesson100 (1881-1935), Paluel J. Flagg
(1886-1970) F.W. Clement (1892-1970).
100% , -
, - 1930. -
XX . . -
C.B. Courville, -
, - , , -
, .
.101 ,
W.D.A. Smith, - .
, - -
, ,
.102 . -
, John C. Krantz-,
, -
, ,
- ,
105 .

XX . ,
. -
James T. Gwathmey (1865-1944) , -
(. . 1-18D) .
1914. 600 - Max S. Sadove (1914-1997)
, . 1930. , , ,
, , ,
, . .
- 1953.
, ,
- -
. - . , -
, XIX., .
, , . ,
, , , -
, -

. . , , , 10
XX . 1953.
, , , - - . -
. 1923. - .106
, ,
, , -
;
. -
Chauncey Leake103 (1896-1978) . 1954., -

, Imperial
. 1934. Ralph Waters (1884-1979) Chemical Industries Charles Suckling .
, James
Ravents107 (1905-1983),
, - 1956 . Michael Johnstone.108 -
.
- .
. - , ,
. ,
A , , 1935 .,
17 1
. ,
, 40 .117,118
, ,
, . -
. , -
1958. 39- ,
.
11 , - , -
.109 1963 . ,
, - , -
.
(. . 24).110 , ,
-
, 119, 1990 .
. .120 ,
, ,

I
- -
, , , -
. .
1964. - 40 Travenol Laboratories -
The National Halothane Study. . -
, , ,
,
.111 , , -
, - 1980-.121
, , , .
, -
.
. ,
, . -
. - -
, , ,
, - , -
112, - ,
. . , -
1960 ., - , -
-
. , 1960 1980 . Ross C. Terrell .
Ohio Medical Products 700 -
, . ,
Edmund I. Eger II (. 1930) , - , -
- , ,
. Seymore S. .
Kety113 (1915-2000) 114, ,

, -
.
()
-


() (. . 19). , MA . , , Francis Rynd122
(1801-1861) ,
, 50% -
- . Alexander Wood123 (1817-1884)
.115 , ,
.
. Daniel Ferguson.
-
, . ,
MA116, , - ,
, - ,
,
. . -
, , Charles Hunter,
, Ohio Medical Products, , A
I 18


, , -
.

XX . ,
, , -
,
.



. -
. 25 (G)

,
-
.

. 1-8 Clysmatica Nova


. (1623-1688), 1667. ,

XIX . , ,

.
( National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.)
. -
-
- -
, , .124 ,
. ,
milieu interne*, .
(. 1-8). - . ,
, ,
. , ,
.
, - , , -
. , - ,
, . -
, -
. ,
1896 . H. Wulfing Luer
, . 1898 . milieu interne.
Maxwell W. Becton Fairleigh S.
Dickinson (Becton, Dickinson and Company). 1906. Dewitt
Herz , , Record.

, . - XIX. ,
, , ,
100 , Record, -, 0,9% ,
. Hartog J.
. Hamburger (1856-1924) ,
- 0,9% .125
.
. , , -
, . Ernest H. Starling126 (1866-1927)
. -
. -
, - .
, ,
. ,
, , - , XIX.
. , ,
. ,
1918. - .
, , , - 1831 . William B. OShaughnessy127 (1804-1889)
A . * . (. . . .)
19 1
. -
, . - ,
, .
- -
, ,
, -
- .
- .

- . ,
Emil Schwartz128 ,
(1852-1918), , - ,
. -
. M.T. Jenkins (1917-1994)134.
Johann J. Bischoff129 (1841-1892),
,

I
-
. -

, - c . Jean Baptiste
- Denis (1625-1704) , ,
. 135
- -
Sydney Ringer130 (1835-1910) . , -
. , .
, ,
, - ,
, - . XVIII
, , XIX . ,
. - .
,
. - James Blundell136 (1790-1877),
, - ,
, . 1818
, - 1828 . 10
. , -
XX . -
- .
. , , -
- .
- 1900 . Karl Landsteiner137 (1868-1943)
, . : , ; , ,
2 A. V. Decastello138. 1906. George W.
, , Crile (1865-1943)
, - -
. - . -, -
1939.
. 1944 .
- -
, , , .
, . , -
.131 - -
Francis D. Moore, .
, . ,

, , . 1914 . Albert Hustin139 (1882-1967) ,
. 1950 . -
Carl Moyer132 (1908-1970) , - . 1916. P. Rous J.R. Turner
, ,140
- 21 .141
. 1909 . .
, -
. ,
1959 ., G. Shires .133 -
, -
- , A
I 20

1914., - (. . 55).
, John
S. Lundy142 (1894-1972), 1945., 147,148
, -
. , .
.
,
. 1935 .
.



-
143 1970. (. . 57) .
G. Klebanoff -
, Bentley Laboratories.
144 53
, ,
-
3500 . 1975. Malcolm D. Orr -

Haemonetics145 . Bernabe Cobo (1582-1657),
,
1653.149 1856. Albert Niemann (1834-1861) -
. , - , ,
, (. 1-9B) .
, -
. - -
. Vasili von Anrep150 (1852-1918)
,
. ,

, -
.
. Ronald ,
D. Miller (. 1939) .146 . 1883.
, E.coca.

A B C

. 1-9 , . , Papaver somniferum, . -


, , , , , -
. (372-287 . ..), III . ..
B, Erythroxylon coca, , , 1856. .
, . C, Strychnos toxifera,
. 1841 . , ,
, . , , , -
Chondodendron tomentosum. , ,
(Atropa belladonna), (Atropa mandragora), (Physostigma venenosum), (Vitus vinifera), (Hordeum vulgare,
A ), (Strychnos toxifera), (Ephedra sinica), (Anamirta occulus), (Camellia sinensus)
(Digitalis purpurea). ( National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.)
21 1
(1856-1939), -
,
.
, ,
. , -
, -
Carl . 1880 .
Koller151 (1858-1944), -, ,
- , -
. . , Anton Wlfler,
. Theodore Billroth , -
, ,
. ,
.
. ,
, , William Halsted (1852-1922) Alfred

I
, - Hall, -
, 8 ,
. .
, 1879-1880 . ,
, ,
- ,
. 1882.
,
- . 1884 .
.
,
- .
, , 15 1884.
, 6 1884. New York Medical Journal,
- , .154
. Josef 4% (15 )
Brettauer (1835-1905) , , -
.152 ,
- -
. - , . 2
(80 )
Leopold Koenigstein, ,
.
1884 ., ,
, . - ,
, , , ,
.155
.
. , , ,
, .
, . ,
, 153 .
, .
1884 . , -
. , , 1924.
, - 1892. -
, 1885 . Carl Schleich156
-. - (1859-1922)
. .
. , (0,01 0,2%)
. .
, , James Leonard Corning157 (1855-1923) ,
. , -
, 1886., . - .
,
. . Heinrich F.
1944. , Braun158 (1862-1934)
- -
, , , , .
.151 , A
I 22

. -
1905 . -
, . , 158,
1907.
, ,
. -
1933.
,
, . ,
1884., -

. , 13
, . 1911 .
G. Hirschel159 -
- (. 1-10A). - A

. George Pitkin
R.H. de Jong.160 .
,
, D. Kulenkampff

161 (. . 1-10). -
10
, ,
.
,
,
. -

, .

1917 . L. Bazy V. Pauchet, B
1973. P. Raj162 (. . 52).
. 1-10 , 1911.
20 2% .
, - ,
, 1912 . M. Kappis163
. . B,
, -
. .
, , . 10 2%
J. Etienne, . . , .
,

. (A, Hirschel G: Die Anasthesierung de Plexus Bra-
. 1970. Alon P. Winnie164 - chialis fur die Operationen an der oberen Extremitat, Much Med Wochenschr
, 58:1555-1556, 1911; B, Kulenkampff D: Anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Zentrabl
, - Chr 38:1337-1340, 1911.)
, ,
. 1924 . -
-
. Gaston Labat. -
-
.
- (1869-1936),
, ,
.
. -
1908. August Bier (1861-1949) .
- ,
(. 1-11A).164,165 ,
- ,
. - . ,
1922.,50 -
. , .
, -
. . -
, Emery A. Rovenstine (1895-1960),
A , . -
23 1

I
. 1-11 A B
. , .. . B, . C,
. D, . . (
National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.)

C D

, .
. , (
1952.), (1957.) (1963.). -
- ,
- - ,
. ,169 -
, (,
. (1917-1994), 1996) .170 (), -
.166
- -
- , -
, ,
, - .

. , ,
-
. 1905. Alfred Einhorn167 (1856-1917) -
*,

1932., **,
. 1948 . Torsten
Gordh168 (. 1907) ,
, 8 -
- (. . 87). James
. - Leonard Corning (1855-1923) ,
,
* (. . .)
** (. . .) . : A
I 24

-
.173 ,
, - --
, - , , ,
. 12 . ,
1885. 45-
120 .
, T11 -
T12, , -
. , .
-
- . 11 1899. ..
, 174
- . 26 1899 . Frederick Dudley
. Tait (1862-1918) Guido Caglieri175 (1871-1951)
, - . 9 1899 . Theodore
171, Tuffier176 (. 1-11B) .
120 (60 60 8 10 1899 . Rudolph Matas177 (1860-1957)
) - - (. 1-11)
. , 2
-
. , - 1000 , -
.
, - -
- .
. -

, , .
, , A.W. Morton178
-
.
. Thomas Jonnesco179
398
(. . 51)
.
XIX. , , -
. , -
. Friederich von 14 , 45
Esmarch (1823-1908) , 25 . 1909 . 180
- ,
. Heinrich I. Quincke (1842-1922) -
- ,
, ,
, : .
. 1891. , -
1787. Domenico Cotugno (1736-1822) -
, - ,
.172 - -
, , Walter . S. Ormond Goldan
Wynter (1860-1945) , , , -
.
- . , -
,181 ,
. , -
- .
- ,
, , -
, . , -
. 1,5 , ,
15 1898. - . -
August Hildebrandt (1868-1954) 1900 .
. -
5 15 - ,

. - -
A , , , .177 Otojiro
25 1
Kitagawa182 (1864-1922) .
( 10 ) -
. 190 -
,
,
. 1900. .
F. Gumprecht183 15 -
. , , -
- .
.
, , , -
. 1924. -
1903., , -
. , Leroy D. Vandam (1914-2004)
. Robert Dripps (1911-1974) -
-

I
- ,
. Arthur E. Barker184 (1850-1916) ,
.191
. -
-
, . ,
-
. -
. 1960. James B. Gormley192
. -
-
.185 .
Anthony J. DiGiovanni Burdett S. Dunbar 1970.193
. 50 . ,
-

. -
1953 . .

-
.186 Albert Wooley Cecil Roe -
, 1947. (. . 51)

, , .
1901. Jean Enthuse Sicard (1872-1929) Fernand Cathelin
. , (1873-1945), ,
, , -
- () .
,
. - ,
- .
, .187 (1862-1934) Arthur Lwen194 (1876-1958)
1954.
- , -
10098 , -
71 ,
- . , -
.188 - -
, ,
, -
. , -
, .
,
- . 1913.
.189 , B. Heile195
- ,

.
.
, - , , , - A
I 26

. -
( ,
). - 142,199,
196, , -
,
. , -
.
1921 . Fidel Pags197 . 1936 . Charles B. Odom
(1886-1923) 285 -
- -
.
.200
. 43 ,
- . John R. Harger .201
, , 1000
, -
.
- 45-50 2% . 1951. .202
, 600
.
-
, - .
, -
, - , -
, .

. - ,
, , , .180
, , - -
. 43 - .
, William T. Lemmon (1896-1974)
17 ,
.
1931 . Achille Mario Dogliotti198 (1897-1966) (. . ,
. 1-11D) -
. ,
. .
- Edward B. Tuohy203 (1908-1959) -
,
. .
- ,
. - , -
. 1947 . Manuel Martinez
. 1939 . - Curbelo204 , ,
, -
, .
, 59 -
. .
, , , 4 ,
.
- .

. W.B. Edwards Robert
- A. Hingson (1918-1996)205, 1942 .,
,
, ,
,
. .
A. Gutierrez ,
, . ,
-
. , , -
, -
. , , ,
-
A 1939. , .
27 1
1960 ., ,
, ,

. Philip R. Bromage John J. Bonica
- .216

, -
, -
.
, -
.206 -
, -
- 70 (. . 26 27). -
, Massey Dawkins (1905-1975),
. , Michael Cousins207, , ,
-

I
- .
, 1872. PierreCyprien Or (1828-1891)
, -
. , .
, -
, , - ,
, - .

- .
-
-
. , .
1979 . J. Wang .208 ; , -,


. ,
. ()
-
. 1976. Yaksh Rudy209 , .
- - ,
. Duggan North210 - ,
, ,
,
. .
- -
,
.211 , -
, -
, ,
.208 Samii 212 , . -
,
. 213 .
, 1864. Adolf von Baeyer -
1-2 , , -
24 . 1979. Behar - . ,
214 -
, . , ,

, *,
- .
. , ,
- 1903 . Emil Fischer (1852-1919)
,
.215 - , ,
, - 30 . Helmut Weese217 (1897-1954),

, , 1932.
, . 1934 .,
. - , .
- * . urea (. . .)
A
I 28


.218 - -
,
, .
- ,
. , - - ,
, .
, ,
, , - 1977 .221,225,
, . ,
, -
. ,
, - , ,
. ,
1941 . .
,
- ,
, - -
- .219 . -
, ,
, , , .
, , -
, .220 - -
, , ,
, , . ,
, - (),
. - -
.
. -
. , -
, .
- ,
- . , ,
, ,221 ,
- ,
, , - ,
, . 1973. (). ,
- ,
, - -
, ,
- . -
- .222 - -

-
. . -
, , -
- 30 226, -
, .
,
.
1933 .
, . ,
-
(), - , - -
1960 . , ,
( 1963 .) ( 1978 .). -
, (. . 29).
, .223 100 ,
1962. -
, , , .

. -
, 1966 .224 -
.
, - (, I, 260) (, IX, 772) -
A , - . -
29 1

. 1-12 ()
(B)
, -

,

. (-
National Library of
Medicine, Bethesda, MD.)

I
A B

toxon ().
, ,
500 , ,
, - -
, , Benjamin Brodie (1783-
. 1862) (. 1-12) Charles Waterton (1783-1865) (. .
(1457-1525), XVI . 1-12).229
, 1505. : ,
, -
, . -
, ,
, . , ,
,
.
, , 1814 . ,

, , , ,
. . , ,
,
.
227 (1552-1618) ,
, , 10 .

; --
, .
. , .
, ,
. , .
, ,
, . , ,
, , :
. - . , -
, , .
.
CharlesMarie de la Condamine (1701-1774)
, , -
, . , 25 .
Richard Brocklesby (1722-1797) , ,
2 , .
. Wanderings in South America
Felix Fontana (1720-1805) - 1879. -
, ,
. , , -
, .228 . A
I 30

Claude Bernard230 (1813-1878), - , -


.
, (. 1-13).

-- 1958., 57 . -
.
- Sayre Merrill. -
, Willy Kuhne ,
(1837-1900). .
-
,
-
, .
, , ,
, ,
,
, -
.231 , .
175 ** - 4
- , . 1938 .
- 11 ,
. 75 ,
, 1912 ., .
- , , -
: , .
.
2% Abram E. Bennett, -
, . , -
- . -
. , -
, A.R. McIntyre,
,
. , (.
1-14).
,
, .
Chondodendron tomentosum Strychnos toxifera
(. . 1-9). 1935. , -
Chondodendron -. . E.R. Squibb and
, Sons
, Richard C. Gill232 (1901-1958). ,
, , -
-. 1940 . 234
. ,
, , .
. , 1929. -
- , ,
. ,
.
, , . , -
1929 . , .
, , 750 E.R. Squibb and Sons, --
. 1930. Lewis H. Wright (1894-1974), ,

.233 , 1940. -
, . Harold R. Griffith (1894-1985) (. . 1-14) -
, ,
1932., , , .
-
, , ,
, , , ,
. - . 1942.
Walter Freeman (1895-1972) - Enid Johnson
43 -

*
A (. . .) 235.
31 1
. 1-13 , (1813-1878)
, -
. , ,
. , -
, .
,
-
. 1855. -
.
. B,

--
. -
(I) .
, -
(N) -
.

, .
, , ,

I
- .230 (-
A B National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.)

, , 1954 . . (1907-1976) .. 240


. ,
236 (1909-1979) , , -
-
, .
. T. Cecil Gray237 (. 1913) - , -
- . 1952. ChurchillDavidson Richardson241 -
, -
, -
-- . Phyllis Harroun238,239 , -
.
,
, - 1960-.242,243
, ,
- -
. 1947 . William Neff -- ,
- , , .244
, - , -
- ,
. , - -
, . 1947. , ,
, - ,
, -
. .

. 1-14, , 1938.
11 , , . Squibb and
Sons, Inc. -
. B, (
) 1942. -
43 . ( Guedel
Memorial Anesthesia Center, San Francisco, CA.)

A B A
I 32

-
. -
1949 . -- .
- -
245, . Samuel
.246 1957 . Daniel Bovet (1907- Meltzer (1851-1920) John Auer (1875-1948), -
1992) ,
. , .251
- -
, . 1911 . C.A. Elsberg (1871-1948)
,
. .252 -
, - -
- Francis E. Shipway (1875-1968)
V
, . - ,
50 , . ,
- , - , -

, - 253,
. , ,
, - -
, - , - -
, (- .
1966 .)247, ( 1980 .)248,249
( 1991 .)250. ,
,
.
-

. 1885.
. S.S. White
, Messrs. Coxeter.
,
,

. Frederick Hewitt,
-
(. . 25). ,
John Snow - ; -
-
. .98
-
, .
, , -
, , 5% 8%.
. -
, , ,
. ,
, . - .
, 1847 ., , ,
: Jay Albion Heidbrink (1857-1957), -
,
, , -
, -
, ,
, . ,
, ,
, ,
, , Heidbrink Anesthetizer. Heinrich
. Drager (1847-1917) Bernhard Drager (1870-1928)
, , -

,
, c , -
A , . -
33 1
,
,

.
XIX.
.
(1828-1902)
-
,
, , -
.

.254 -
-
(. 1-15). 1905. Franz Kuhn (1866-1929)

I
,
.
Dennis E. Jackson (1878-1980)
-
. 1-15 .
-
. (h), ,
(1, 2), (k) .255 -
; -
.
. (Coleman A:
,
Mr. Colemans Economizing Apparatus for Re-inhaling the Gas. Br J Dent Sci 12:443,
1869) ,

. 1923 .
. . . (1875- (1884-1979) (. . 1-18B),
1941), , , - , , -

, .256 -
- ,
, - , , ,
. ,
.
. -
-
, - , -
. XX .
, , 1930 . Brian C. Sword257
, , ,
. , :
, ,
, , - .
. , -
. 1908 .
Karl Kuppers -
1910.
,
, -
.
, Lucien Morris258
XX. - . -
, ,
. -
.
, -
. , , , , -

, .
- , ,
.
, - .
, - , - A
I 34

, , - , -
. .
, ,
, , , - . 29
, . 1881 . Theodor Billroth (1829-1894)
, .
- ,
-
, . , , XX .
, , - George W. Crile (1864-1943).
, -
. .
, -

.265 -
Anoci-
ssociation, 1914.266
,
, - , Harvey Cushing267
Fell-ODwyer, 1892 .259 (1869-1939), -
1896 .
. -
Rudolph Matas, . , ,
, , -
, - (. 1-16).
- .260 - , ,
, , -
, - ,
.261 , -
,
. 1934. , .
Spiropulsator, 1947. E. Trier Moerch (1908- -
1995) .262 -
. 1957. P. Woodbridge268
. : (1) -
. , (2) , (3)
, (4) . -
. 1950-. 269 M. Pinsker -
Bjrn Ibsen263 (. : (1) , (2) (3)
1915) - .

- , -
.
- -
, , .
-. ,
, ,

. 1981 .
Michael Roizen270 (. 1947) ,
-

. , -
, - .
20 , , -
-, ,
, ,
. 1846. , . .
,
. 1809. Ephraim ,
McDowell264 (1771-1830) -
, . , -
10 . -

, -
A . - .271
35 1
,
, -
,
. -
1959. DeCastro Mundeleer276. ,
,
,
.

.
, , ,
,
, -
-
. ,
,

I
,
-
.
30
-

. , , -

. 1-16
( ) -
( ). , ,
. -
.77 -
.
2,5 .
,
230 . . , , -
. , .

.267 (Cushing H: On Routine Determination of Arterial . , -
Tension In Operating Room and Clinic. Boston Med Surg J 148:250-256, 1903.)


, -
.77,277,278
. Edward Lowenstein 272 ,
- 100 ,
, , ,
. 1967. - .

.
Theodore H. Stanley .273
,
-

, -
.

, . -
, -
, 50 -

. 1971. - ,
,
.274 -
-
,
, , (. . 50 93). ,
. , ,
, ,
, -

. , - . Friedrich von Esmarch279
, - (. 1-17) ,
.275 A
I 36

, - .
, :
.
-
, -
.
, -
, , , ,
.
. , -
,
, 1874., J. Heiberg . -
,
. 283 1933.
, ,
, -
, -
, ().
.
, 1850. -
, John Warren280 , -
: (1)
3 - XVIII.
, (2) , -
, (3) - -
, .
, (4) , Joseph ODwyer
, (1841-1898) , -
, (5) .284
, , - George Fell (1850-1918)
, (6) , - -
, .
- .
, Armand
, Trousseau (1801-1867), ,
. . ,
, Curl Schimmelbusch (1860-1895), .
- -
*,
. 279 .285
, 1851.,
. -
, - .
. -
- , Friedrich Trendelenburg
, , (1844-1924) .286
. William Macewen (1848-1924) ,

Francis Sibson281,282 (1814-1876), - -
,
. . 5 1878. 287
,
.
, -
.
;
, -
. ,

.

, -
.
. 1-17 279
, -
A . ( von Esmarch F: Handbuch der Kriegschirur-
gischen Technik. Hanover, Carl Rumpler, 1877.) * .: le tubage du larynx (. .)
37 1
- 1949 .
, , 294,
. Ernst -
Ferdinand Sauerbruch288 (1875-1951), .
MickuliczRadecki (1850-1905), -
, , 295 -
-296 . 1941. -
.
- ,
,
( ) , , -
,
- .297
. -
,
. , -

I

, , ,
, - , ,
,
. , -
(1866-1929) Alfred Kirstein298,299
(1863-1922), Chevalier Jackson300 (1865-1958) Gustav Killian
, , (1898-1912)*.
- -
. - .
1905 . , , -
- , -
. - Manuel Garcia (1805-1868). 1854.
,
, Observations on the Human Voice,
. ,
XX -
. .301 1895 .
, - ,
,
. , , , -
- .298 -
,
Ivan W. Magill289 (1888-1986) (. 3 , -
1-18A) Edgar S. Rowbotham290 (1890-1979), 302,
, ,
- . - .
,
, - ,

. - -
, .
, -
, -
. -
,
.
. 1928 . Arthur Guedel (1883-1956) , -
(. 1-19) Ralph M. Waters (1883-1979) , U- .
(. .
1-18B)291, . -
, , -
, - ,
, .
1932 .292
, -

. - * .
1860-1921. : www.etolen.com/

index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5061 (. .
.293 .)
A
I 38

A B

C D

. 1-18 XX . , (1888-1986) , .
1913. .
(1890-1979)
. ,
. 98 . , ,
1960., . B, . , ,
. ,
, 1916. 1927. ,
. , , , ,
.
, . C, . (1897-1989)
. . ,
. 1937 . - . ,
, , , ,
. , 1955. . D, .
, , 1865. 1899. 1903.
, -,
. -
. ,
. ( Wood LibraryMuseum of Anesthesiology, Park Ridge, IL.)

A
39 1

,

() ,
-
.
A.J. Brain ,
, 1983. -
.305 -
,
,
.


.

I
XIX . John Tyndall (1820-1893),
1867 .
,
1854 . ,
. 1-19
.
, . 1930. H. Lamm306 -
, ,
. , ,
, ,
, , ,
. S. Ikeda307
, ,
1919 . , , -
, 1968 .
2 .353 ( Guedel Memorial Anesthesia Center, San
1971.308
Francisco, CA)

. Robert A. (. . 97)
Miller303 .
, , - ,

. Robert R. Macintosh (1897-1989) (. . 1-18C) , 1792 ., James Curry
, -
, ,
.304 - (. . 93 97). 1827 . J. Leroy
, - ,
,
. , ,
, - -
, - . ,
. ,
- ,
. , -
, ,
, , - .
. ,
XX ., -
. 1946.
, -
, , James O. Elam (1918-1995),
. ,
1940-1950-. -
- --, . Peter
, Safar (1924-2003) -
-
100%, , -
,
.
, --,
, -.309,310
, , - -
. A
I 40


. Augustus Waller311 .
(1856-1922) - -
1887. , - ,
, -
Willem Einthoven312 (1860- .
1927) 1903. , -
, 150 .322,323
, ,
James B. Herrick313 (1861- -
1954) . 1887 . John MacWilliam314 (1857-1937) ,
, -
, . ,
.315 1899 . J.L. Prevost F. Battelli316 , Status
, , - lymphaticus.324 -
, - ,
, , -
. Claude Beck317 (1894-1971) -
- .
1947. -
-
1901 1902 . Starling,310,318 1904. W.W. . ,
Keen (1837-1932)319 . ,
1883 . Franz Koenig , 320, ,
,
. 1929. William B. Kouwenhoven (1886-1975), , ,
, ,
1939 1953 ., - , , ,
31 - .
,

.321 ,
- -
,
, ,
1951 325,
(). ,
.
Curtis L. Mendelsohn -
-
, , . 1945 .
66 -
, ,
.326 ,

-
. .
, - -

. .
1846. ,
.
.
,
-
, , -
.86 - -
- .
. , 291, -
, 1928 ., ,
1847., George Hayward (1791-1863). 1858. - -
, . -
327,
. , -
, . ,
A 1848 ., 12- , -
41 1
- .
.
, .
, - , , -
. - ,
, ,
- .
- , -
. , Current Research in Anesthesia and
- Analgesia 1922 .,
. Francis Hoffer McMechan (1879-1939)331.
1961. Brian A. Sellick328 (1918-1996) - ,
,
. - , -
. 1940. -
, , ,

I

. , 1776 ., John . ,
Hunter329 - ,
. - . 1936.
(),
38000 .
1940 .
. Anesthesiology. -
, , - -
, ,
, ,
, - .

, -
. . -
, ,
, , -
. , - , , , -
.
1847 ., , -
, .
. 1985 . -
, , - Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF), -
, , Ellison C.
Pierce-. -
, - -
, ,
.
.
- , ,
.330 - .332,333
, -
, -
.
- ,
. - , XIX., Rene
, T. Laennec334 (1781-1826) ,
,
, - . -
. - stetho () scope ( ).

. -
() Z-79 - 1896 . ,
. 1954. C. Smith,335
,
, . - ,
.
() 1894. A.E. Codman (1869-1940) -
( F-29) - ,
, . A
I 42

(1869-1939), . R.S. Blacher345 , -


,
.336 - -
- - -
, , -
- , -
337 - . , , -
, 2 ,
, - -
, . Tunstall346
, . - ,
- , -
,
. - . 1929 . Johannes Hans
Berger347 (1873-1941) -
- , -
, - Albert Falconer-348
, (1911-1985). 30
ST. - -
,
, - .
, , -
1940- . , BIS monitor,
, -
.
, - -
.338 , ,
.349
, , - ,
, - BIS,
,
.339,340 -
, .
, , , -
. H - .
, , , , ( ) -
, - ,
, - , ,
.341
,
, .
- 1913 . Charles R. Richet350 (1850-1935), -
. ,
, ,
, 15 -
, - . ,
-
, ,
- .342 ,
5-3 - . 1932.
,
.343 -
- 351, -

, , - .
,
-
. - , ,

, - . ,
, -
, Scott M.
Smith344 (. 1912) , 100 . 1914 .
- , (. . 1-18D) , -
,
A , - 0,01%. ,
43 1
,
. , 1914. - .
, - ,
, ,
.
, ,
- ,
, , . ,
. ,
- . 1775. Joseph Priestley352
. - ,
, Experiments and Observations of Different Kinds of Air
: ,
, -
, . ;
, .

I
, - , ,
, - , ,
, XVIII . ,
. , , - 150 ,
, - , -
150 , ,
, ,
. .


1. Fenster J: Ether Day: The Strange Tale of Americas 18. Severinghaus JW, Honda Y: Pulse oximetry. Int Balfour & Neill, 1751.
Greatest Medical Discovery and the Haunted Anesthesiol Clin 25:205-214, 1987. 35. Willis T: Practice of Physik. London, T Dring, C
Men Who Made It. New York, HarperCollins, 19. Hales S: Statical Essays, Containing Haemas- Harper & J Leigh, 1684.
2001. taticks. London, W Innys & R Manby, 1733. 36. Pourfour Du Petit F: Mmoire dans lequel il est
2. Sykes W: Essays on the One Hundred Years of 20. Poiseuille J. Recherches sur la Force du Coeur dmontr que les nerfs intercostaux fournissent
Anesthesia. Edinburgh, Livingstone, 1960. Aortique. Paris, cole Polytechnique, 1828. des rameaux que portent des esprits dans les yeux.
3. Major R: A History of Medicine. Springfield, IL, 21. Vierordt K: Die bildliche Darstellung des men- Hist Acad R Sci 1727, pp 1-19.
Charles C Thomas, 1954. schlichen Arterienpulses. Arch Physiol Heilk 37. Winslow J: Exposition Anatomique de la Structure
4. Hook R: An account of an experiment made by 13:284-287, 1854. du Corps Humain. Paris, G Desprez, 1732.
M Hook of preserving animals alive by blowing 22. RivaRocci S: Un nuovo sfigmomanometro. Gaz 38. Bernard C: Influence du grand sympathique sur la
through their lungs with bellows. Philos Trans R Med Torino 47:981-996, 1896. sensibilit et sur la calorification. Comptes Rendus
Soc Lond 2:539-540, 1667. 23. Korotkov N: On methods of studying blood pres- Soc Biol 3:163-164, 1852.
5. Lower R: Tractatus de Corde. London, Redmayne, sure. Izvest Imp Voyenno Med Akad St Petersburg 39. Langley J, Dickinson W: On the local paralysis of
1669. 11:365, 1905. peripheral ganglia, and on the connexion of differ-
6. Priestley J: Experiments and Observations on Dif- 24. von Recklinghausen H: Neue Wege zur Blut- ent classes of nerve fibres with them. Proc R Soc
ferent Kinds of Air. London, Johnson, 1776. druckmessung. Berlin, SpringerVerlag, 1931. 46:423-431, 1889.
7. Boklund U: Scheele, CW: His Work and Life. 25. Seldinger S: Catheter replacement of the needle in 40. Langley J: Observations on the physiological
Stockholm, Roos Boktrycherier, 1961. percutaneous arteriography. Acta Radiol 39:368- action of extracts of the supra-renal bodies. J
8. Sprigge JS: Sir Humphry Davy: His researches in 376, 1953. Physiol 27:237-256, 1901.
respiratory physiology and his debt to Antoine 26. Forssmann W: Die Sondierung des rechten 41. Abel J, Crawford A: On the blood-pressure-raising
Lavoisier. Anaesthesia 57:357-364, 2002. Herzens. Klin Wochenschr 8:2085-2087, 1929. constituent of the suprarenal capsule. Bull Johns
9. Haldane J: A new form of apparatus for measuring 27. Massa D, Lundy JS, Faulconer A Jr: A plastic Hopkins Hosp 8:151-157, 1897.
the respiratory exchange of animals. J Physiol needle. Mayo Clin Proc 25:413-415, 1950. 42. Elliott TR: On the action of adrenalin. J Physiol
13:419-430, 1892. 28. Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, et al: Catheterization 31:xx-xxi, 1904.
10. Haldane J: The therapeutic administration of of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed 43. Barger G, Dale H: Chemical structure and sympa-
oxygen. BMJ 1:181-183, 1917. balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med 283:447- thomimetic action of amines. J Physiol 41:19-59,
11. Haldane J, Priestley J: Lung ventilation. J Physiol 451, 1970. 1910.
32:225-266, 1905. 29. Fick A: Uber die Messung des Blutquantums in 44. Dixon W, Hamil P: The mode of action of specific
12. Haldane J: Respiration. New Haven, Yale Univer- den Herzventrikeln. Sitzber Phys Med Ges Wurz- substances with special reference to secretin.
sity Press, 1922. burg July 9, 1870. In Fishman AP, Richards DW J Physiol 38:314-336, 1908-1909.
13. von Hufner CG: ber die Quantitat Sauerstoff (eds): Circulation of the Blood: Men and Ideas. 45. Dale H: The action of certain esters and ethers of
welche 1 gramm Hamoglobin zu binden Vermag. New York, Oxford University Press, 1964. choline, and their relation to muscarine. J Pharma-
Z Physiol Chem 1:317, 1877. 30. Frazin L, Talano JV, Stephandies L: Esophageal col Exp Ther 6:147-190, 1914.
14. Clark LC, Wolf R, Granger D, Taylor Z: Continu- echocardiography. Circulation 54:102-108, 1976. 46. Gaskell W: The involuntary nervous system. Part
ous recording of blood oxygen tensions by polar- 31. Matsumoto M, Oka Y, Lin YT: Transesophageal 1. London, Longmans, Green, 1916.
ography. J Appl Physiol 6:189-193, 1953. echocardiography for assessing ventricular perfor- 47. Loewi O: ber humorale ebertragbarkeit der
15. Van Slyke D, Neill J: The determination of gases in mance. N Y State J Med 79:19-21, 1979. Herznervenwirkung. Pflg Arch Ges Physiol
blood and other solutions by vacuum extraction 32. Kremer P, Schwartz L, Cahalan M, et al: Intraop- 189:239-242, 1921.
and manometric measurement. J Biol Chem erative monitoring of left ventricular performance 48. Tuffier T: Effets circulatoires des injections
61:523-573, 1924. by transesophageal M-mode and 2D echocardiog- sousarachnoidiennes de cocaine dans la region
16. Severinghaus J, Bradley A: Electrodes for blood raphy. Am J Cardiol 49:956, 1982. lombaire. Soc Biol 18:897-899, 1900.
Po2 and Pco2 determination. J Appl Physiol 33. Oka Y: The evolution of intraoperative transesoph- 49. Smith G, Porter W: Spinal anesthesia in the cat.
13:515-520, 1958. ageal echocardiography. Mt Sinai J Med 69:18-20, Am J Physiol 38:107-127, 1915.
17. Nunn J: Nunns Applied Respiratory Physiol 2002. 50. Labat G: Regional Anesthesia: Its Technic and
ogy, 4th ed. Oxford, ButterworthHeinemann, 34. Whytt R: An Essay on the Vital and Other Invol- Clinical Application. Philadelphia, WB Saunders,
1993. untary Motions of Animals. London, Hamilton, 1922. A
I 44

51. Aeschlimann J, Reinart MJ: The pharmacological 79. Burney F: A mastectomy, 30 September 1811. In tile anaesthetic. Br J Pharmacol 11:394-410, 1956.
action of some analogues of physostigmine. J Carey J (ed): Eyewitness to History. Cambridge, 108.
Johnstone MW: The human cardiovascular
Pharmacol 43:413, 1931. Harvard University Press, 1990, pp 272-277. response to Fluothane. Br J Anaesth 28:392-410,
52. MacIntosh R: Death following injection of neostig- 80. Katz J, Kavanagh BP, Sandler AN, et al: Preemptive 1956.
mine. BMJ 1:852, 1949. analgesia. Clinical evidence of neuroplasticity 109. Virtue R, Payne KW: Postoperative death after

53. Mein A: Ueber die Darstellung des Atropins in contributing to postoperative pain. Anesthesiol- Fluothane. Anesthesiology 19:562-563, 1958.
weissen Krystallen. Ann Chem Pharm 6:67-72, ogy 77:439-446, 1992. 110. Lindenbaum J, Leifer E: Hepatic necrosis associ-
1833. 81. Warren J: A Practical Treatise on Hernia. Boston, ated with halothane anesthesia. N Engl J Med
54. Franko B, Lunsford C: Derivatives of 3-pyrrolidi- Osgood, 1882. 268:525-530, 1963.
nols. III. The chemistry, pharmacology, and 82. Beddoes T, Watts J: Considerations on the Medici- 111. Bunker JP: Final report of the National Halothane
toxicology of some N-substituted 3-pyrrolidyl nal Use and on the Production of Factitious Airs. Study. Anesthesiology 29:231-232, 1968.
alpha-substituted phenylacetates. J Med Pharm Bristol, Bulgin and Rossner, 1795. 112. Mazze RI, Shue GL, Jackson SH: Renal dysfunction
Chem 2:523-540, 1960. 83. Davy H: Researches Chemical and Philosophical associated with methoxyflurane anesthesia: A ran-
55. Ahlquist R: A study of the adrenotropic receptors. Chiefly concerning Nitrous Oxide or Dephlogisti- domized, prospective clinical evaluation. JAMA
Am J Physiol 153:586-600, 1948. cated Nitrous Air, and Its Respiration. Bristol, 216:278-288, 1971.
56. Kamibayashi T, Maze M: Clinical uses of alpha2- Biggs and Cottle, 1800, pp 1-580. 113. Kety S, Schmidt C: Nitrous oxide method for

adrenergic agonists. Anesthesiology 93:1345-1349, 84. Faraday M: Effects of inhaling the vapors of sul- quantitative determination of cerebral blood flow
2000. phuric ether. Q J Soc Arts Miscellanea 4:158-159, in man; theory, procedure and normal values. J
57. Marsh N, Marsh A: A short history of nitrogly 1818. Clin Invest 27:476-483, 1948.
cerin and nitric oxide in pharmacology and physi- 85. Hickman H: A letter on suspended animation con- 114. Severinghaus JW: Methods of measurement of

ology. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 27:313-319, taining experiments showing that it may be safely blood and gas carbon dioxide during anesthesia.
2000. employed on animals, with the view of ascertain- Anesthesiology 21:717-726, 1960.
58. Ringertz N: Alfred Nobelhis life and work. Nat ing its probable utility in surgical operations on the 115. Eger EI 2nd, Saidman LJ, Brandstater B: Minimum
Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:925-928, 2001. human subject. Ironbridge, W. Smith, 1824. alveolar anesthetic concentration: A standard of
59. Murrell W: Nitroglycerin in angina pectoris. 86. Bigelow HJ: Insensibility during surgical opera- anesthetic potency. Anesthesiology 26:756-763,
Lancet 1:80-81, 1879. tions produced by inhalation. Boston Med Surg J 1965.
60. Siegel P, Moraca PP, Green JR: Sodium nitroprus- 35:309-317, 379-382, 1846. 116. Quasha A, Eger EI, Tinker J: Determination and
side in the surgical treatment of cerebral aneu- 87. Robinson J: A Treatise on the Inhalation of the applications of MAC. Anesthesiology 53:315-334,
rysms and arteriovenous malformations. Br J Vapour of Ether for the Prevention of pain in Sur- 1980.
Anaesth 43:790-795, 1971. gical Operations. London, Webster, 1847. 117. Dobkin AB, Heinrich RG, Israel JS, et al: Clinical
61. Murad F: Cyclic guanosine monophosphate as a 88. Skovsted P, Price HL: Central sympathetic excita- and laboratory evaluation of a new inhalation
mediator of vasodilation. J Clin Invest 78:1-5, tion caused by diethyl ether. Anesthesiology agent: Compound 347 (CHF2-O-CF2-CHF Cl).
1986. 32:202-209, 1970. Anesthesiology 29:275-287, 1968.
62. Frostell C, Fratacci MD, Wain JC, et al: Inhaled 89. Long C: An account of the first use of sulphuric 118. Stevens WC, Eger EI, Joas TA, et al: Comparative
nitric oxide: A selective pulmonary vasodilator ether by inhalation as an anaesthetic in surgical toxicity of isoflurane, halothane, fluroxene and
reversing hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. operations. South Med Surg J 5:705-713, 1849. diethyl ether in human volunteers. Can Anaesth
Circulation 83:2038-2047, 1991. 90. Simpson JY: Discovery of a new anaesthetic agent, Soc J 20:357-368, 1973.
63. von Haller A: A dissertation on the sensible and more efficient than sulphuric ether. Lond Med Gaz 119. Eger EI 2nd, Johnson BH: Rates of awakening from
irritable parts of animals. London, J Nourse, 1755. 5:934-937, 1847. anesthesia with I-653, halothane, isoflurane, and
64. von Haller A: De Partibus Corporis Humani Sen- 91. Channing W: A Treatise on Etherization in Child- sevoflurane: A test of the effect of anesthetic con-
sibilibus et Irritabilibus. Comment Soc Reg Sci birth. Boston, WD Ticknor, 1848. centration and duration in rats. Anesth Analg
Gottingen 2:114-158, 1752. 92. Hyderabad Chloroform Commission: Report of 66:977-982, 1987.
65. Bell SC: Idea of a new anatomy of the brain. the first Hyderabad Chloroform Commission. 120. Jones RM, Cashman JN, Eger EI 2nd, et al: Kinetics
London, Strahan & Preston, 1811. Lancet 1:421-429, 1890. and potency of desflurance (I-653) in volunteers.
66. Magendie F: Expriences sur les fonctions des 93. Guthrie LG: On some fatal after-effects of chloro- Anesth Analg 70:3-7, 1990.
racines des nerfs rachidiens. J Physiol Exp Pathol form on children. Lancet 1:193-197, 1894. 121. Katoh T, Ikeda K: The minimum alveolar concen-
2:276-279, 366-371, 1822. 94. Levy A: Chloroform Anaesthesia. London, John tration (MAC) of sevoflurane in humans. Anesthe-
67. Mller J: ber die phantastischen Gesichtserschei- Bales, Sons & Danielsson, 1922. siology 66:301-303, 1987.
nungen. Leipzig, J Hlscher, 1826. 95. Smith GB, Hirsch NP: Gardner Quincy Colton: 122. Rynd F: Neuralgiaintroduction of fluid to the
68. Gasser H, Erlanger J: The role of fiber size in the Pioneer of nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Anesth Analg nerve. Dublin Med Press 13:167-168, 1845.
establishment of a nerve block by pressure or 72:382-391, 1991. 123. Wood A: Treatment of neuralgic pains by narcotic
cocaine. Am J Physiol 88:581-591, 1929. 96. Colton G: Anaesthesia. Who Made and Developed injections. BMJ 2:721-723, 1858.
69. Ellis H: Operations That Made History. London, This Great Discovery? New York, AG Sherwood, 124. Bernard C: Leons sur les Phnomnes de la Vie
Greenwich Medical Media, 1996. 1886. Communs aux Animaux et aux Vgtaux. Paris,
70. Beecher H: Pain in men wounded in battle. Ann 97. Andrews E: The oxygen mixture, a new anaesthetic Baillire, 1879.
Surg 123:96-105, 1946. combination. Chicago Med Examiner 9:656, 1868. 125. Hamburger H: Osmotischer Druck und Ionen-
71. Melzack R, Wall P: Pain mechanisms: A new 98. Hewitt FG: Anaesthetics and Their Administra- lehre in den Medicinischen Wissenschaften. Wies-
theory. Science 250:971-975, 1965. tion. London, C Griffin, 1893. baden, JF Bergman, 1902.
72. Reynolds D: Surgery in the rat during electrical 99. Johnson G: On the physiology of asphyxia and on 126. Starling E: On the absorption of fluids from the
analgesia induced by focal brain stimulation. the anaesthetic action of pure nitrogen. Lancet connective tissue spaces. J Physiol 19:312-326,
Science 164:444-445, 1969. 1:814-815, 1891. 1896.
73. Goldstein A, Tachibana S, Lowney LI, et al: 100. McKesson EI: Nitrous oxide-oxygen anaesthesia. 127. OShaughnessy W: Proposal of a new method of
Dynorphin(1-13), an extraordinarily potent With a description of a new apparatus. Surg treating the blue epidemic cholera by the injection
opioid peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:6666- Gynecol Obstet 13:456-462, 1911. of highly oxygenized salts into the venous system.
6670, 1979. 101. Courville C: Asphyxia as a consequence of nitrous Lancet 1:366, 1831-1832.
74. Hughes J: Isolation of an endogenous compound oxide anesthesia. Medicine (Baltimore) 15:129- 128. Schwarz E: Ueber den Werth der Infusion alcalis-
from the brain with pharmacological properties 245, 1936. cher Kochsalzlosung in das Gefasssystem bei
similar to morphine. Brain Res 88:295-308, 1975. 102. Smith WD: Under the Influence: A History of acuter Anamie [dissertation]. Halle, Plotzsche
75. Simantov R, Childers SR, Snyder SH: Opioid Nitrous Oxide and Oxygen. London, Macmillan, Buchsdruckerei, 1888.
peptides: Differentiation by radioimmunoassay 1982. 129. Astrup P, Bie P, Engell HC: Salt and Water in
and radioreceptor assay. Brain Res 135:358-367, 103. Leake C, Chen M-Y: The anesthetic properties of Culture and Medicine. Copenhagen, Munksgaard,
1977. certain unsaturated ethers. Proc Soc Exp Biol 1993.
76. Cousins MJ, Mather LE: Intrathecal and epidural 28:151-154, 1930. 130. Ringer S: Regarding the action of hydrate of soda,
administration of opioids. Anesthesiology 61:276- 104. Hewer C, Hadfield C: Trichloroethylene as an
hydrate of ammonia, and hydrate of potash on the
310, 1984. inhalation anaesthetic. BMJ 1:924-927, 1941. ventricle of the frogs heart. J Physiol 3:195-202,
77. Kehlet H, Brandt MR, Hansen AP, Alberti KG: 105. Krantz JC: Anesthesia. XL. The anesthetic action 1880.
Effect of epidural analgesia on metabolic profiles of trifluoroethyl vinyl ether. J Pharmacol 108:488- 131. Coller F, Campbell K, Vaughan H, et al: Posto
during and after surgery. Br J Surg 66:543-546, 495, 1953. perative salt intolerance. Ann Surg 119:533-542,
1979. 106. Krantz J: Historical Medical Classics Involving
1944.
78. Adams F: The Genuine Works of Hippocrates, On New Drugs. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1974. 132. Moyer CA: Acute temporary changes in renal

A Surgery. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1939. 107. Ravents J: The action of FluothaneA new vola- function associated with major surgical proce-
45 1
dures. Surgery 27:198-207, 1950. Anesthesiology 22:215-225, 1961. 190. Rigler ML, Drasner K, Krejcie TC, et al: Cauda
133. Shires G, Brown F, Canizaro P, et al: Distributional 161. Kulenkampff D: Anesthesia of the brachial plexus. equina syndrome after continuous spinal anesthe-
changes in extracellular fluid during acute hemor- Zentralbl Chir 38:1337-1340, 1911. sia. Anesth Analg 72:275-281, 1991.
rhagic shock. Surg Forum 11:115-117, 1960. 162. Raj P, Montgomery S, Nettles D, Jenkins M: Infra- 191. Vandam L, Dripps R: Long term follow-up of

134. Jenkins M: History of Sequestered Edema Associ- clavicular brachial plexus blocka new approach. patients who received 10,098 anesthetics. JAMA
ated with Surgical Operations and Trauma: Fluid Anesth Analg 52:897-904, 1973. 161:586-591, 1956.
and Blood Therapy in Anesthesia. Philadelphia, FA 163. Kappis M: Conduction anesthesia of the abdomen, 192. Gormley J: Treatment of post-spinal headache.

Davis, 1982. breast, arm and neck with paravertebral injection. Anesthesiology 21:565-566, 1960.
135. Denis JB: A letter concerning a new way of curing Med Wochenschr 59:794-796, 1912. 193. DiGiovanni AJ, Dunbar BS: Epidural injections of
sundry diseases by transfusion of blood. Philos 164. Winnie A: Interscalene brachial plexus block.
autologous blood for postlumbar-puncture head-
Trans R Soc Lond 2:489-504, 1667. Anesth Analg 49:455-466, 1970. ache. Anesth Analg 49:268-271, 1970.
136. Blundell J: Experiments on the transfusion of
165. Wulf H: The centennial of spinal anesthesia. Anes- 194. Lwen A: ber die Verwertung der Sakralansth-
blood by the syringe. Med Chir Trans 9:56-92, thesiology 89:500-506, 1998. esie fur chirurgische Operationen. Zentralbl Chir
1818. 166. Bonica JJ: Basic principles in managing chronic 37:708, 1910.
137. Landsteiner K: Zur Kenntnis der antifermenta- pain. Arch Surg 112:783-788, 1977. 195. Heile B: Der epidurale Raum. Arch Klin Chir

tiven, lyteschen und agglutinierender Wirkungen 167. Einhorn A: ber die Chemie der lokalen Ans- 101:845-877, 1913.
des Blutserums und der Lymphek. Centralbl Bak- thetica. Munch Med Wochenschr 46:1218-1220, 196. Tuffier T: Analgesie cocainique par voie extradur-
teriol Parasit Infekt 27:357-362, 1900. 1254-1256, 1899. ale. C R Soc Biol Paris 53:490-492, 1901.
138. Decastello A, Sturli A: ber die Isoagglutinine im 168. Holmdahl M: Xylocaine (lidocaine, lignocaine), its 197. Pags MF: Anestesia metamrica. Rev Sanid Milit
Serum gesunder und kranker Menschen. Munch discovery and Gordhs contribution to its clinical 11:351-365, 389-396, 1921.

I
Med Wochenschr 49:1090-1095, 1902. use. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 113:8-12, 198. Dogliotti AM: Eine neue Methode der regionren
139. Hustin A: Note sur une nouvelle mthode de
1998. Ansthesie: Die peridurale segmentre Ansthesie.
transfusion. Bull Soc R Sci Med Brux 72:104-111, 169. Albright GA: Cardiac arrest following regional
Zentralbl Chir 58:3141-3145, 1931.
1914. anesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaine. Anes- 199. Flagg P: The Art of Anaesthesia, 7th ed. Philadel-
140. Rous P, Turner JR: The preservation of living red thesiology 51:285-287, 1979. phia, JB Lippincott, 1954.
blood cells in vitro. J Exp Med 23:219-248, 1916. 170. Ruetsch YA, Boni T, Borgeat A: From cocaine to 200. Odom C: Epidural anesthesia. Am J Surg 34:547-
141. Loutit J, Mollinson P: Advantages of a disodium- ropivacaine: The history of local anesthetic drugs. 558, 1936.
citrate glucose mixture as a blood preservative. BM Curr Top Med Chem 1:175-182, 2001. 201. Harger J, Christofferson EA, Stokes AJ: Peridural
J 2:744-745, 1943. 171. Marx GF: The first spinal anesthesia. Who deserves anesthesia: A consideration of 1000 cases. Am J
142. Lundy J: Clinical Anesthesia. A Manual of Clinical the laurels? Reg Anesth 19:429-430, 1994. Surg 52:24-31, 1941.
Anesthesiology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1945. 172. Quincke H: Die Lumbalpunktion des Hydroceph- 202. Crawford O, Buckingham WW, Ottosen P, Brasher
143. Brown A, Debenham M: Autotransfusion. Use of alus. Berl Klin Wochenschr 28:929-933, 965-968, CA: Peridural anesthesia in thoracic surgery: A
blood from hemothorax. JAMA 96:1223-1225, 1891. review of 677 cases. Anesthesiology 12:73-84,
1931. 173. Bier A: Versuche uber Cocainisirung des Rucken- 1951.
144. Klebanoff G, Rogers W: Clinical experience with markes. Dtsch Z Chir 51:361-369, 1899. 203. Tuohy E: Continuous spinal anesthesia: Its useful-
autotransfusion. Ann Surg 180:269-304, 1974. 174. Seldowitsch J: ber Kokainisierung des Rcken- ness and technic involved. Anesthesiology 5:142-
145. Orr M: Autotransfusion: The use of washed red marks nach Bier. Centralb Chir 26:1110-1113, 148, 1944.
cells as an adjunct to component therapy. Surgery 1899. 204. Curbelo MM: Continuous peridural segmental

84:728-732, 1978. 175. Tait D, Cagliari G: Experimental and clinical notes anesthesia by means of a ureteral catheter. Anesth
146. Miller RD, Robbins TO, Tong MJ, Barton SL:
on the subarachnoid space. Trans Med Soc St Calif Analg 28:13-23, 1949.
Coagulation defects associated with massive blood 266-271, 1900. 205. Edwards WB, Hingson RA: Continuous caudal

transfusions. Ann Surg 174:794-801, 1971. 176. Tuffier T: Analgesie chirurgicale par linjection
anesthesia in obstetrics. Am J Surg 57:459-464,
147. Blajchman MA, Herst R, Perrault RA: Blood com- sousarachnoidienne lombaire de cocaine. Soc Biol 1942.
ponent therapy in anaesthetic practice. Can 11:882-884, 1899. 206. Moore D: Regional Block. Springfield, IL, Charles
Anaesth Soc J 30: 382-389, 1983. 177. Matas R: Local and regional anesthesia with
C Thomas, 1953.
148. Robblee JA, Crosby E: Transfusion medicine issues cocaine and other analgesic drugs, including the 207. Cousins M, Bridenbaugh P: Neural Blockade.

in the practice of anesthesiology. Transfus Med subarachnoid method, as applied in general surgi- Philadelphia, JB Lippincott, 1980.
Rev 9:60-78, 1995. cal practice. Phil Med J 6:820-843, 1900. 208. Wang JK, Nauss LA, Thomas JE: Pain relief by
149. Cobo B: Historia del Nuevo Mundo. Manuscrito 178. Morton A: The subarachnoid injection of cocaine intrathecally applied morphine in man. Anesthe-
en Lima, Peru, Libro 5: Capitulo XXIX, 1653. for operations on all parts of the body. Am Med siology 50:149-151, 1979.
150. von Anrep V: ber die physiologische Wirkung 3:176-179, 1901. 209. Yaksh TL, Rudy TA: Analgesia mediated by a

des Cocain. Pflugers Arch Physiol 21:38-77, 1880. 179. Jonnesco T: Remarks on general spinal analgesia. direct spinal action of narcotics. Science 192:1357-
151. Liljestrand G: Carl Koller and the development of BMJ 4:1396-1401, 1909. 1358, 1976.
local anesthesia. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 299:3- 180. Bier A: Das Zurzeit an der Berliner chirurgischen 210. Duggan AW, North RA: Electrophysiology of

29, 1967. Universittsklinik bliche Verfahren der Rcken- opioids. Pharmacol Rev 35:219-281, 1983.
152. Koller C: On the use of cocaine for producing marksansthesie. Dtsch Z Chir 95:373-385, 1909. 211. Atweh S, Kuhar M: Autoradiographic localization
anaesthesia on the eye. Lancet 2:990-994, 1884. 181. Goldan SO: Intraspinal cocainization for surgical of opiate receptors in rat brain. Brain Res 124:53-
153. Freud S: ber Coca. Centralblatt fr die gesamte anesthesia. Phil Med J 6:850-857, 1900. 67, 1977.
Therapie 2:289-314, 1884. 182. Kitagawa O: On spinal anesthesia with cocaine. J 212. Samii K, Chauvin M, Viars P: Postoperative spinal
154. Hall RJ: Hydrochlorate of cocaine. N Y Med J 40, Jpn Soc Surg 3:185-191, 1901. analgesia with morphine. Br J Anaesth 53:817-820,
1884. 183. Gumprecht F: Gefahren der Lumbalpunktion;
1981.
155. Halsted WS: Practical comments on the use and pltzliche Todesfalle danach. Dtsch Med Wochen- 213. Cousins MJ, Mather LE, Glynn CJ, et al: Selective
abuse of cocaine; suggested by its invariably suc- schr 27:386-389, 1900. spinal analgesia. Lancet 1:1141-1142, 1979.
cessful employment in more than a thousand 184. Barker A: Clinical experiences with spinal anesthe- 214. Behar M, Magora F, Olshwang D, Davidson JT:
minor surgical operations. N Y Med J 42:294, sia in 100 cases. BMJ 23:665-674, 1907. Epidural morphine in treatment of pain. Lancet
1885. 185. Lee JA: Arthur Edward James Barker 1850-1916. 1:527-529, 1979.
156. Schleich C: Infiltrationsansthesie (locale Ansth- British pioneer of regional analgesia. Anaesthesia 215. Ready LB, Oden R, Chadwick HS, et al: Develop-
esie) und ihr Verhltnis zur allgemeinen Narcose 34:885-891, 1979. ment of an anesthesiology-based postoperative
(Inhalationsansthesie), Verhandl D Deutsch 186. Cope R: The Wooley and Roe case. Anaesthesia pain management service. Anesthesiology 68:100-
Gesellsch F Chir 21:121-127, 1892. 9:249-270, 1954. 106, 1988.
157. Coming JL: On the prolongation of the anaesthetic 187. Kennedy F, Effron A, Perry G: The grave spinal 216.
Wang C, Chakrabarti MK, Whitwam JG:
effect of the hydrochlorate of cocaine, when sub- cord paralysis caused by spinal anesthesia. Surg Specific enhancement by fentanyl of the effects of
cutaneously injected. An experimental study. N Y Gynecol Obstet 91:385-398, 1950. intrathecal bupivacaine on nociceptive afferent
Med J 42:317-319, 1885. 188. Dripps R, Vandam L: Long term follow-up of
but not on sympathetic efferent pathways in
158. Braun H: Die Lokalansthesie, ihre wissenschafli- patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics. dogs. Anesthesiology 79:766-773; discussion 25A,
chen Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung. Failure to discover major neurological sequelae. 1993.
Leipzig, Johann Barth, 1907, pp 102-104. JAMA 156:1486-1491, 1954. 217. Weese H, Sscharpff W: Evipan, ein neuartiges

159. Hirschel G: Anesthesia of the brachial plexus for 189. Freedman JM, Li DK, Drasner K, et al: Transient Einschlafmittel. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 58:1205-
operations on the upper extremity. Med Wochen- neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia: An 1207, 1932.
schr 58:1555-1556, 1911. epidemiologic study of 1,863 patients. Anesthesi- 218. Lundy J: Intravenous anesthesia: Preliminary

160. de Jong R: Axillary block of the brachial plexus. ology 89:633-641, 1998. report of the use of two new thiobarbiturates. Proc
A
I 46

Mayo Clin 10:536-543, 1935. derivati della succinilcolina dotati di azione curar- 271. Mangano DT, Layug EL, Wallace A, Tateo I: Effect
219. Halford F: A critique of intravenous anesthesia in ica. Esteri di trialchiletanolammonio di acidi of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular mor-
war surgery. Anesthesiology 4:67-69, 1943. bicarbossilici alifatici. R C Ist Super Sanita 12:106- bidity after noncardiac surgery. Multicenter Study
220. Bennetts FE: Thiopentone anaesthesia at Pearl
137, 1949. of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. N Engl
Harbor. Br J Anaesth 75:366-368, 1995. 246. Thesleff S, von Dardel O, Holmberg F: Succinyl- J Med 335:1713-1720, 1996.
221. Kay B, Stephenson DK: ICI 35868 (Diprivan): A choline iodide. New muscular relaxant. Br J 272. Lowenstein E, Hallowell P, Levine FH, et al: Car-
new intravenous anaesthetic. A comparison with Anaesth 24:238-244, 1952. diovascular response to large doses of intravenous
Althesin. Anaesthesia 35:1182-1187, 1980. 247. Baird WL, Reid AM: The neuromuscular blocking morphine in man. N Engl J Med 281:1389-1393,
222. Doenicke A, Kugler J, Penzel G, et al: Cerebral properties of a new steroid compound, pancuro- 1969.
function under etomidate, a new non-barbiturate nium bromide: A pilot study in man. Br J Anaesth 273. Stanley T, Philbin D, Coggins C: Fentanyl oxygen
I.V. hypnotic [authors translation]. Anaesthesist 39:775-780, 1967. anaesthesia for coronary artery surgery. Cardio-
22:357-366, 1973. 248. Durant NN, Marshall IG, Savage DS, et al: The vascular and antidiuretic hormone responses. Can
223. Hunkeler W, Mohler H, Pieri L, et al: Selective neuromuscular and autonomic blocking activities Anaesth Soc J 26:168-172, 1979.
antagonists of benzodiazepines. Nature 290:514- of pancuronium, Org NC 45, and other pancuro- 274. Clark RB: Transplacental reversal of meperidine
516, 1981. nium analogues, in the cat. J Pharm Pharmacol depression in the fetus by naloxone. J Ark Med Soc
224. Corssen G, Domino EF: Dissociative anesthesia: 31:831-836, 1979. 68:128-130, 1971.
Further pharmacologic studies and first clinical 249. Miller RD: Org Nc 45. Br J Anaesth 52(Suppl 275. Kienbaum P, Thurauf N, Michel MC, et al: Pro-
experience with the phencyclidine derivative 1):71S-72S, 1980. found increase in epinephrine concentration in
CI-581. Anesth Analg 45:29-40, 1966. 250. Booij LH, Knape HT: The neuromuscular blocking plasma and cardiovascular stimulation after mu-
225. Kay B, Rolly G: I.C.I. 35868, a new intravenous effect of Org 9426. A new intermediately-acting opioid receptor blockade in opioid-addicted
induction agent. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 28:303- steroidal nondepolarising muscle relaxant in man. patients during barbiturate-induced anesthesia for
316, 1977. Anaesthesia 46:341-343, 1991. acute detoxification. Anesthesiology 88:1154-
226. White PF: Use of patient-controlled analgesia for 251. Meltzer S: Continuous respiration without respira- 1161, 1998.
management of acute pain. JAMA 259:243-247, tory movements. J Exp Med 11:622-625, 1909. 276.
DeCastro J, Mundeleer P: Anesthesie sans
1988. 252. Elsberg C: Anaesthesia by the intratracheal insuf- sommeil. La neuroleptanalgesie. Acta Chir Belg
227. Raleigh W: The Discoererie of the Large, Rich and flation of air and ether. Ann Surg 53:161-168, 1911. 58:689, 1959.
Beautiful Empire of GuinaPerformed in the Year 253. Crafoord C: Pulmonary ventilation and anesthesia 277. Asoh T, Tsuji H, Shirasaka C, Takeuchi Y: Effect of
1595 by Walter Raleigh, Captaine of her Maiestss in major chest surgery. J Thorac Surg 9:237-253, epidural analgesia on metabolic response to major
Guard. London, Robert Robinson, 1596. 1940. upper abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol
228. Betcher A: The civilizing of curare: A history of its 254. Coleman A: Mr. Colemans economising apparatus Scand 27:233-237, 1983.
development and introduction into anesthesiol- for re-inhaling the gas. Br J Dent Sci 12:443, 1869. 278. Bevan DR: Modification of the metabolic response
ogy. Anesth Analg 56:305-319, 1977. 255. Jackson D: A new method for the production of to trauma under extradural analgesia. Anaesthesia
229. Brodie B: Experiments and observations on the general analgesia and anaesthesia with a descrip- 26:188-191, 1971.
different modes in which death is produced by tion of the apparatus used. J Lab Clin Med 1:1-12, 279. von Esmarch F: Handbuch der Kriegschirurgis-
certain vegetable poisons. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 1915. chen Technik. Hannover, Germany, Carl Rumpler,
1:194-195, 1811. 256. Waters R: Clinical scope and utility of carbon
1877.
230. Bernard C: Lecons sur les effects des substances dioxide filtration in inhalation anesthesia. Curr 280. Warren J: Address before the American Medical
toxiques et medicamenteuses. Paris, Bailliere, Res Anesth Analg 3:20-22, 1924. Association, Boston, John Wilson, 1850, pp 5-65.
1857. 257. Sword B: The closed circle method of administra- 281. Sibson F: On the treatment of facial neuralgia by
231. Wells T: Three cases of tetanus, in which woorara tion of gas anesthesia. Curr Res Anesth Analg the inhalation of ether. Lond Med Gaz 4:358-364,
was used. Proc R Med Chir Soc Lond 3:142-157, 9:198-202, 1930. 1847.
1859. 258. Morris L: A new vaporizer for liquid anesthetic 282. Maltby JR: Francis Sibson, 1814-1876. Pioneer and
232. Gill R: White Water and Black Magic. New York, agents. Anesthesiology 13:587, 1952. prophet in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 32:53-62,
Holt, 1940. 259. ODwyer J: An improved method of performing 1977.
233. Gill R: Mrs. Robinson Crusoe in Ecuador. Natl artificial forcible respiration with exhibition of 283. Guedel A: A nontraumatic pharyngeal airway.

Geog Mag 65:134-150, 1934. instruments. Arch Pediatr 9:30-34, 1892. JAMA 100:1862, 1933.
234. Bennett A, McIntyre A, Bennett A: Pharmacologic 260. Matas R: Intralaryngeal insufflation for the relief 284. ODwyer J: Fifty cases of croup in private practice
and clinical investigations with crude curare. of acute surgical pneumothorax. Its history and treated by intubation of the larynx, with a descrip-
JAMA 114:1791, 1940. methods with a description of the latest devices for tion of the method and of the dangers incident
235. Griffith H. Johnson G: The use of curare in general this purpose. JAMA 34:1468-1473, 1900. thereto. Med Rec 32:557-561, 1887.
anesthesia. Anesthesiology 3:418-420, 1942. 261. Drinker P, McKhann C: The use of a new apparatus 285. Trousseau A: Du tubage de la glotte et de la trache-
236. Cullen S: The use of curare for improvement of for the prolonged administration of artificial res- otomie, par M Bouchut. Bull Acad Med 24:99,
abdominal muscle relaxation during inhalation piration. I. A fatal case of poliomyelitis. JAMA 1858.
anesthesia: Report on 131 cases. Surgery 14:261- 92:1658-1660, 1929. 286. Trendelenburg F: Beitrge zu den Operationen

266, 1943. 262. Moerch E: Controlled respiration by means of
an den Luftwegen. Arch Klin Chir 12:112-133,
237. Gray T, Halton J: A milestone in anaesthesia,
special automatic machines as used in Sweden and 1871.
d-tubocurarine chloride? Proc R Soc Med 39:400- Denmark. Proc R Soc Med Lond 40:603-607, 1947. 287. Macewan W: Clinical observations on the intro-
410, 1946. 263. Ibsen B: Anaesthetists viewpoint on the treatment duction of tracheal tubes by the mouth instead of
238. Harroun P, Beckert F, Hathaway H: Curare and of respiratory complications in poliomyelitis performing tracheotomy or laryngotomy. BMJ
nitrous oxide anesthesia for lengthy operations. during the epidemic in Copenhagen, 1952. Proc 2:122-124, 163-165, 1880.
Anesthesiology 7:24-28, 1946. Roy Soc Med (Lond) 47:72-74, 1954. 288. Sauerbruch EF: ber die physiologischen and

239. Harroun P, Hathaway H: The use of curare in anes- 264. McDowell E: Three cases of extirpation of diseased physikalischen Grundlagen bei intrathorakalen
thesia for thoracic surgery. Surg Gynecol Obstet ovaria. Med Classics 2:651-653, 1938. Eingriffen in meiner pneumatischen Operation-
82:229-231, 1946. 265. Crile G: Nitrous oxide anaesthesia and a note on skammer. Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 32:105-115, 1904.
240. Beecher HK, Todd DP: A study of the deaths asso- anoci-association, a new principle in operative 289. Magill I: Endotracheal anesthesia. Proc R Soc Med
ciated with anesthesia and surgery: Based on a surgery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 13:170-173, 1911. 22:1-6, 1928.
study of 599,548 anesthesias in ten institutions 266. Crile G, Lower WE: AnociAssociation. Philadel- 290. Rowbotham E, Magill I: Anaesthetics in the plastic
1948-1952. Ann Surg 140:2-34, 1954. phia, WB Saunders, 1914. surgery of the face and jaws. Proc R Soc Med
241. ChurchillDavidson H, Richardson AT: Decame- 267. Cushing H: On the avoidance of shock in major 14:17-27, 1921.
thonium iodide (c 10): Some observations on its amputations by cocainization of large nerve- 291. Guedel A, Waters, RM: A new intratra-
action using electromyography. Proc R Soc Med trunks preliminary to their division. Ann Surg cheal catheter. Anesth Analg 7:238-239, 1928.
45:179-186, 1952. 36:321-345, 1902. 292. Gale J, Waters R: Closed endobronchial anesthesia
242. Cohen AD: A simple inexpensive nerve stimulator. 268. Woodbridge P: Changing concepts concerning
in thoracic surgery: Preliminary report. Anesth
Anaesthesia 18:534-535, 1963. depth of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 18:536-550, Analg 11:283-287, 1932.
243. Katz R: A nerve stimulator for the continuous 1957. 293. Magill I: Anaesthesia in thoracic surgery, with

monitoring of muscle relaxant action. Anesthesiol- 269. Pinsker M: Anesthesia: A pragmatic construct.
special reference to lobectomy. Proc R Soc Med
ogy 26:832-833, 1965. Anesth Analg 65:819-820, 1986. 29:649-653, 1936.
244. Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray T: Quantitative assess- 270. Roizen MF, Horrigan RW, Frazer BM: Anesthetic 294. Carlens E: A new flexible double-lumen catheter
ment of residual antidepolarizing block (part II). doses blocking adrenergic (stress) and cardiovas- for bronchospirometry. J Thorac Surg 18:742-746,
Br J Anaesth 43:478-485, 1971. cular responses to incisionMAC BAR. Anesthe- 1949.
A 245. Bovet D: Propriet farmacodinamiche di alcuni siology 54:390-398, 1981. 295. Robertshaw F: Low resistance double-lumen endo-
47 1
bronchial tubes. Br J Anaesth 34:576-579, 1962. JAMA 135:985-986, 1947. ards for patient monitoring during anesthesia at
296. Green R, Gordon W: Right lung anaesthesia.
318. Starling E, Lane W: Case report. Lancet 2:1397, Harvard Medical School. JAMA 256:1017-1020,
Anaesthesia 12:86-93, 1957. 1902. 1986.
297. Murphy F: Two improved intratracheal catheters. 319. Keen W: A case of total laryngectomy (unsuccess- 338. Denborough M, Lovell R: Anaesthetic deaths in a
Anesth Analg 20:102-105, 1941. ful) and a case of abdominal hysterectomy (suc- family. Lancet 2:45, 1960.
298. Kirstein A: Autoskopie des Larynx und der
cessful), in both of which massage of the heart for 339. Sessler DI: Mild perioperative hypothermia. N

Trachea. Berl Klin Wochenschr 32:476-478, 1895. chloroform collapse was employed, with notes of Engl J Med 336:1730-1737, 1997.
299. Hirsch NP, Smith GB, Hirsch PO: Alfred Kirstein: 25 cases of cardiac massages. Ther Gaz 28:217-230, 340. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R: Perioperative nor-
Pioneer of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 41:42- 1904. mothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-
45, 1986. 320. Koenig F: Lehrbuch des Allgemeinen. Chirurgie, wound infection and shorten hospitalization.
300. Jackson C: Tracheobronchoscopy, Esophagoscopy Gttingen, 1883. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature
and Gastroscopy. St Louis, CV Mosby, 1907. 321. Kouwenhoven W, Jude F, Knickerbocker G: Closed Group. N Engl J Med 334:1209-1215, 1996.
301. Garcia M: Observations on the human voice. Proc chest cardiac massage. JAMA 173:1064-1067, 341. Orkin F: What do patients want? Preferences for
R Soc Lond 7:399-410, 1854. 1960. immediate postoperative recovery. Anesth Analg
302. Killian G: Ueber directe Brochoskopie. Munch
322. Beecher H: The first anesthesia death with some 74:S225, 1992.
Med Wochenschr 45:844-847, 1898. remarks suggested by it on the fields of the labora- 342. Watcha M, White P: Postoperative nausea and

303. Miller R: A new laryngoscope. Anesthesiology
tory and the clinic in the appraisal of new anes- vomitingits etiology, treatment, and prevention.
2:317-320, 1941. thetic agents. Anesthesiology 2:443-449, 1941. Anesthesiology 77:162-184, 1992.
304. Macintosh R: A new laryngoscope. Lancet 1:205, 323. Knight PR 3rd, Bacon DR: An unexplained death: 343. Watcha M, Smith I: Cost-effectiveness analysis of
1943. Hannah Greener and chloroform. Anesthesiology

I
antiemetic therapy for ambulatory surgery. J Clin
305. Brain A: The laryngeal mask: A new concept in 96:1250-1253, 2002. Anesth 6:370-377, 1994.
airway management. Br J Anaesth 55:801-805, 324. Guedel A: Inhalation Anesthesia: A Fundamental
344. Smith SM, Brown HO, Toman JEP, et al: The lack
1983. Guide. New York, Macmillan, 1937.
of cerebral effects of d-tubocurarine. Anesthesiol-
306. Lamm H: Biegsame optische Gerte. Z Instrumen- 325. Lowenthal PJ, Russell A: Recovery room: Life

ogy 8:1-14, 1947.
tenk 50:579-581, 1930. saving and economical. Anesthesiology 12:470-
345. Blacher R: On awakening paralyzed during

307. Ikeda S, Yanai N, Ishidawa S: Flexible bronchofib- 476, 1951.
surgery. A syndrome of traumatic neurosis. JAMA
erscope. Keio J Med 17:1-18, 1968. 326. Mendelson C: The aspiration of stomach contents
234:67-68, 1975.
308. Ikeda S: Atlas of Flexible Bronchofiberoscopy. Bal- into the lungs during obstetrical anesthesia. Am J
346.
Tunstall ME: Detecting wakefulness during
timore, University Park Press, 1971. Obstet Gynecol 52:191-205, 1945.
general anaesthesia for caesarean section. BMJ
309. Elam J, Greene DG, Brown ES, et al: Oxygen and 327. Dorrance G: On the treatment of traumatic inju-
1:1321, 1977.
carbon dioxide exchange and energy cost of ries of the lungs and pleura with the presentation
347. Berger J: ber das Elektroenkephalogramm des
expired air resuscitation. JAMA 167:328-334, of a new intratracheal tube for use in artificial res-
Menschen. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 87:527-570,
1958. piration. Surg Gynecol Obstet 11:160-187, 1910.
310. Lind B: Recent History of Resuscitation in Norway. 1929.
328. Sellick B: Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation
AnaesthesiaEssays on Its History. Berlin, of stomach contents during induction of anaesthe- 348. Falconer AJ, Pender JW, Bickford RG: The influ-
SpringerVerlag, 1985. sia. Lancet 2:404-406, 1961. ence of partial pressure of nitrous oxide on the
311. Waller A: A demonstration in man of electromo- 329. Hunter J: Of persons apparently drowned. Philos depth of anesthesia and the electro-encephalo-
tive changes accompanying the hearts beat. J Trans R Soc Lond 66:415-425, 1776. gram in man. Anesthesiology 10:601-609, 1949.
Physiol 8:229-234, 1887. 330. RendellBaker L: Standards for anesthesia: The 349. Glass P, Bloom M, Kearse L, et al: Bispectral analy-
312. Einthoven W: The string galvanometer and the issues. Contemp Anesth Pract 8:59-88, 1984. sis measures sedation and memory effects of
human electrocardiogram. Proceedings of the 331. Bacon DR: The promise of one great anesthesia propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Weten- society. Anesthesiology 80:929-935, 1994. healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 86:836-847,
schappen, Amsterdam, Section of Sciences. 6:107- 332. Gaba DM, Howard SK: Patient safety: Fatigue
1997.
115, 1903. among clinicians and the safety of patients. N Engl 350. Richet C: De lanaphysaxie en general et de

313. Herrick J: Clinical features of sudden obstruction J Med 347:1249-1255, 2002. lanaphysoxie par la mytilocongestine en particu-
of the coronary arteries. JAMA 59:2015-2020, 333. Cooper JB, Gaba D: No myth: Anesthesia is a lier. Ann Inst Pasteur 21:497-524, 1907.
1912. model for addressing patient safety. Anesthesiol- 351. Dragstedt C, GebauerFuelnegg E: Studies in ana-
314. MacWilliam J: Fibrillar contraction of the heart. J ogy 97:1335-1337, 2002. phylaxis. Am J Physiol 102:512-526, 1932.
Physiol 8:296-310, 1887. 334. Laennec RT: De lauscultation mediate. Paris, JA 352. Priestley J: Observations on different kinds of air.
315. MacWilliam J: Cardiac failure and sudden death. Brosson & JS Chaude, 1819. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 62:147-264, 1772.
BMJ 1:6-8, 1889. 335. Smith C: An endo-esophageal stethoscope. Anes- 353.
Guedel A: Ethyl ChlorideChloroform-Ether
316. Prevost J, Battelli F: La mort par les courants elec- thesiology 15:566, 1954. Anesthesia for Rapid Induction and Minor Surgery
triques. J Physiol Pathol Gen 1:427, 1899. 336. Beecher HK: The first anesthesia records. Surg
in War. In McMechan FH (ed): Year Book of Anes-
317. Beck C, Pritchard W, Feil H: Ventricular fibrilla- Gynecol Obstet 71:789, 1940. thesia and Analgesia 1917-1918. New York,
tion of long duration abolished by electric shock. 337. Eichhorn JH, Cooper JB, Cullen DJ, et al: Stand- Surgery Publishing Co.

A
William L. Young, Jeanine P. WienerKronish Lee A. Fleisher
..
..


1. 4.
, , .
.
2. .

. .
5.
-.
. ,
3. ,
, .

,
.
, .
, ,

.

.
-
.


, .
, , 10
, , , , ,
, . - (. 2-1).
-
, , ,
.

, -, -
. - -
, ,
- (. . 71). -
. , , -
- ,
, . -
, ,
- 2005. , 45
. -
- . 1995
, - 2004 . A

49
I 50

A B C

D E F G

. 2-1 . , , . (1450-1516 .); ,


. . Handbuch der
Kriegschirurgischen Technik (1877); , .
1932; D E, - (MR fluoroscopy).
-. (D) (). F G,
(F)
(G). (, del Prado, ; , Jeremy Norman & Co; , Richard Upjohn Light (
); D-G, Paul Larson, MD, UCSF/SF Veterans Administration Medical Center)

,
65 , 38%,
70%. -
-
.1 15% -
,
,
-
. ,
, ,
, -
- .4-6 -
,
, .7
- .2
.
, -
(. . 78). (Pay-for-performance , -
- , -
, ,
. ).8-10
,
.11
.
, -
.12,13
, -
. - .
-
, - , -
, - .
A .3 , -
51 2
- .
, -
.
- . , , -
, -
. ,
, - . -
-
,
. , , . -
,
- .
,
(. . 5).14 - .
- , -
( ,

I
, *, -

..) (. . 33 86). - ,
- . , -
, , -
, -
. . ,
- - -
- . . ,
. , -
- - , -
- .
.15 ,
, -
-
. -
.
. ,

. -
, -
.

,
-
-
, ,
,
. 250000 ,
- 55 , , ,
(. . 5).16 , 2020.20 60- .

. , , 1980.
, 2005 . .

- . -
, - -
.17,18 - ,
70 .
, ,
- , . , 50%
. - -
- .21
,
, , -
.19 .22 . -
,
* Cottage Industry
, -
,
- (. .)
A
I 52

100 . -

.
.
90
, -
80
. per capita,
, $


10
70 , , ,

60 .27
,
50
. ,
40
. , ,
30 ,

20 , ,
.
10

0 -, NIH T-32*.
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
, ,
. 2-2 - , .
1994-2003 . (. )

,
, .20,23 , -
, , --
. ,
; 60000 -
, . , ,
25% .24 - ,
, - . ,
-, - , ,
,
, - , -
.20 - .
, ,
, -
, ,
. . -
-
.
, -
-
,
- -- XIX XX . -
, , , , -
, - , , -
. , - .28,29
,
J.G. Reves25 , ,

. , - : -
. , ,
- -
. ,
, - ,
.
. ,
,
, - .30
. ,
,
,
(. 2-2).26
* NIH T-32 model , -

; -
,
A - (. .)
53 2

. ,
, (,
).32 ,
. , , , -
. , , -
, .30,33
. -- , -
, , , , . -
, ,
. -
.
. -
Vilayanur Ramachandran31 -
Peter Medawar: - .
, , , -

I
.
, , -
, : .
, . .
, !
, -

. ? , -
-
. - ,
-
. - .
- -
.
, - , --
, -
. . ,
, *,
, . ,
, , - , -
. , -
, ,
- .
, -
. , * Doctoral degrees in nursing
(. .)

1. National Center for Health Statistics: Health, 24:1436-1445, 2005. pital Quality Data for FY 2008 Inpatient Prospec-
United States, 2007, with Chartbook on Trends in 8. Rosenthal MB: Nonpayment for performance? tive Payment System Annual Payment Update
the Health of Americans. 2007. Available at http:// Medicares new reimbursement rule. N Engl J Med ProgramHCAHPS Survey, SCIP, and Mortality,
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?indexed=go 357:1573-1575, 2007. Vol 71. Dept of Health and Human Services.
ogle&rid=healthus07.chapter.trend-tables. 9. Shortell SM, Rundall TG, Hsu J: Improving patient Federal Register, 2006.
2. Ruther MM, Black C: Medicare use and cost of care by linking evidence-based medicine and evi- 14. Griffin FA: Reducing surgical complications. Jt
short-stay hospital services by enrollees with cata- dence-based management. JAMA 298:673-676, Comm J Qual Patient Saf 33:660-665, 2007.
ract, 1984. Health Care Financ Rev 9:91-99, 1987. 2007. 15. Klompas M, Kulldorff M, Platt R: Risk of mislead-
3. Fleisher LA, Pasternak LR, Herbert R, et al: Inpa- 10. Lee TH: Pay for performance, version 2.0? N Engl ing ventilator-associated pneumonia rates with
tient hospital admission and death after outpatient J Med 357:531-533, 2007. use of standard clinical and microbiological crite-
surgery in elderly patients: Importance of patient 11. Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, et al: ria. Clin Infect Dis 46:1443-1446, 2008.
and system characteristics and location of care. Quality of primary care in England with the intro- 16. Arens JF: A practice parameters overview. Anes-
Arch Surg 139:67-72, 2004. duction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med thesiology 78:229-230, 1993.
4. Cutler DM: Your Money or Your Life: Strong 357:181-190, 2007. 17. Khuri SF: The NSQIP: A new frontier in surgery.
Medicine for Americas Health Care System. New 12. Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, et al: Public Surgery 138:837-843, 2005.
York, Oxford University Press, 2004. reporting and pay for performance in hospital 18. Tong BC, Harpole DH Jr: Audit, quality control,
5. Bodenheimer T: High and rising health care costs, quality improvement. N Engl J Med 356:486-496, and performance in thoracic surgery: A North
part 2: Technologic innovation. Ann Intern Med 2007. American perspective. Thorac Surg Clin 17:379-
142:932-937, 2005. 13. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: 386, 2007.
6. Mongan JJ, Ferris TG, Lee TH: Options for Medicare Program; Hospital Outpatient Prospec- 19. QualityNet. Available at http://www.qualitynet.
slowing the growth of health care costs. N Engl J tive Payment System and CY 2007 Payment Rates; org/dcs/ContentServer?pagename=QnetPublic/
Med 358:1509-1514, 2008. CY 2007 Update to the Ambulatory Surgical Page/QnetHomepage.
7. Thorpe KE: The rise in health care spending and Center Covered Procedures List; Medicare 20. Salsberg E, Grover A: Physician workforce short-
what to do about it. Health Aff (Millwood) Administrative Contractors; and Reporting Hos- ages: Implications and issues for academic health A
I 54

centers and policymakers. Acad Med 81:782-787, 25. Reves JG: We are what we make: Transforming Available at http://medschool.ucsf.edu/listbuilder/
2006. research in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology chairs_dirs_assts.htm.
21. AAMC Data Book: U.S. Medical School Women 106:826-835, 2007. 30. Fiehler J, Stapf C: ARUBA-beating natural history
Applicants, Accepted Applicants, and Matricu- 26. Moses H 3rd, Dorsey ER, Matheson DH, et al: in unruptured brain AVMs by intervention. Neu-
lants. Washington, DC, Association of American Financial anatomy of biomedical research. JAMA roradiology 50:465-467, 2008.
Medical Colleges, 2005. 294:1333-1342, 2005. 31. Ramachandran VS, Blakeslee S: Phantoms in the
22. Heiligers PJ, Hingstman L: Career preferences and 27. Philipson L: Medical research activities, funding,
Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind.
the work-family balance in medicine: Gender dif- and creativity in Europe: Comparison with
New York, William Morrow, 1998.
ferences among medical specialists. Soc Sci Med research in the United States. JAMA 294:1394-
32. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Lung
50:1235-1246, 2000. 1398, 2005.
23. Jovic E, Wallace JE, Lemaire J: The generation and 28. Columbia University Medical Center. Academic Volume Reduction Surgery (LVRS). 2008. Availa-
gender shifts in medicine: An exploratory survey and Clinical Departments, Centers and Institu- ble at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicareAp-
of internal medicine physicians. BMC Health Serv tions. 2008. Available at http://asp.cumc.columbia. provedFacilitie/LVRS/List.asp
Res 6:55, 2006. edu/depts/. 33. Mathiesen T: Arguments against the proposed
24. Graduate medical education. JAMA 294:1129- 29. University of California San Francisco. Depart- randomised trial (ARUBA). Neuroradiology
1143, 2005. ment Chairs, ORU Directors, and Assistants. 2008. 50:469-471, 2008.

A
Ronald D. Andrew Schwartz
..
..


/ (D.G. Bogod)
(Akiyoshi Namiki Michiaki Yamakage)
(Deepak K. Tempe) :
(Anis Baraka Fouad Salim Haddad)
(Olga Afonin)

: 1920-1980 .
(Deepak K. Tempe) ,
(Anis Baraka Fouad Salim Haddad)
(Olga Afonin)
(Guillermo Lema)
(Yuguang Huang)
(Florian R. Nuevo)
(Lars I. Eriksson Peter Simpson)

. .

- -
. , . -
, - , ,
, ,
. , ,
, , .
,
, , , - . ,
. , , ,
, - , -
- , ,
. , , ,
, : ,
, . ,
() . : -
. , , .

. , ,
,
, -
. , . -
, ,
, - ,
- , .
. , -
, - ,
, - .
.

, Ronald D. , , .
- -

55
I 56

, - , ,
. . ,
; -
,
. - , . ,
- , ,
, , .
, , .
, . ,
, , ,
, , ,
, -
. ,
. , , 1846 .,
, -, -
, .
. -
.
- (Deepak K. Tempe)
XX .
, Susruta, -
, - . ,
, 600 . .., , , -
- . --
. (:
1920- ; : , ).1
1980- . , - , 980 . .., Pandit Ballala
,
, - --
. - , . -

, . , -
, ,
. - .2
, - 900 -
.
1980- . 1846 . ,
. , 22 1847 . -
Dr. O Shaugh-
, , - nessy.3 ,
- - ,
. . ,
, 1890 . ,
,
, 1928 .
, - ,
. , -
, , 12 1925 .
, - Sassoon, .
. ,
, ; -
,
. - .4
?

? -, , , (Anis Baraka Fouad Salim
. Haddad)

C - V . ..
- ,
(632-732 . ..)
3000 ,

XX . , .
A , ,
57 3

B
. 3-1 , (Et quandoque intromittiture
in gutture canula facta de auro aut argento: aut silibus ambobus, adjuvando ad
inspirandu). , : ,
,
. ( Haddad FS: Ibn Sina [Avicenna]
advocated orotracheal intubation 1000 years ago: Documentation of Arabic and
Latin originals. Middle East J Anesthesiol 17:155-162, 2000.)

I
, , ,
. -, -
,
, .
, -
,

.
--
,
, , , -
. , ,
.
,
: (1)
(865-925 . ..), ();
-
5; (2) (980-1037 . ..),
(), ,
: , ; -
:
, , A
-
(. 3-1)6,7; (3) (1208-
1288 . ..), ,
(), -
, ,


(. 3-2); , -

; - B
, (. .
3-2)8,9; (4) ( 840 . ..), . 3-2 , . ,
(), ; ( ),
( ).
. ,
. - -
.10 . ,
(Spongia Som- ,
,
nifera). -
, spongia somnifera,
- () Michael Scot, XIII .
.11,12
IX . II .13,14
, ,
() , XIX .
(, ). - . -, -
, 1798 . ,
.12 , -
. A
I 58

.15 -
XIX -
1805 ., - XX . , ,
. , ,
.
. , , -
Dr. Antoine Berthelemy Clot ( , 1793-
1868), 1825 . 1835 . (Olga N. Afonin)
,

.15 .
XVIII XIX .
; - 15
,
, - - **
( , ,
) (1831-1840). -
. ,
: , , , ,
, , , , . , 16 1846
, - .; -
. .
.. () ,
.
.15 -
. ,
. -
(1831-1840)
, 1879 . ,
Fridrich Gaedcke 1855 .
.15,16 Albert Niemann 1859 .,
, 1884 . -
.15 1904 .,
, 1860 . .
(, )
, - .
. 1866 (Shleich, , , Bier)
. , -
, 1920 . : -
. 1883 . , ,
(Facult Franaise de , -
Mdecine).15 .

. 1846 . -
, (1810-1881). -
17,18 (, -
1846 . , 1847 .). .
, 1873 ., - -
Dr. George Post .15 , -
- 1863 .,
. 1867 . . ,
- , -
, 1873 . - - , -
, ,
; . ,
.
.
1904 . ..
. ..
- - .
. -
-
.15 .
, - , -
- , . 1901 .
A * (. . .)
59 3
Karl Landsteiner ,
. 1909 . .
, : , , , ,
0. , . 60

- 1980- .
, ,
, . 1930 .
Karl Landsteiner .
. 1907 . -
4 . . -
.
.
, - - , -
1917 ., . ,
, ,

I
1920- . , .

, , ,
, , . (Deepak K. Tempe)
1920- . ,
, - 30 -
,
, - , ,
- . -
. , ;
, - -
.* .
1954 .
,
-
,
: ,
1920-1980 . , ,
. , -
1970- .
, , -
. () 1963
- . ,
. , .
- XX . -
. -
, .
, - (ISA) 1946 ., 1947 .
. ISA -
* , 1949 . , -
ISA 1965 .
, . , Macintosh Gray
. -

( , , 1953 .
), (WFSA) 1956 .
19
(, ),
12 2007 .
.
(1946),
,
, . (Anis Baraka Fouad Salim
Haddad)
,
, ,

.. , ,
, .

.

, ,
(. . . .) , A
I 60

-- . ,
,
. , .

(, , )16. . -
.
, - , ,
-
, , .
,
. , , .
, 1928 .
, , - , , ,
. , .
,
, -
, , ..
- 1926 .
. -
XX . , ,
, .
. -
() - -
-
,
. .
. 1924 . .. ..
, -
, ,
- -
, , - .
, ,
- . Dr. Henry
. Hickman
-, - -
. ,
. , 1928 .
1966 . 1939 . .. .. -
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology
(ISSN 0544-0440), . .
, ,
,
.
,
. Index Medicus , -
MEDLARS. ,
1960- 1970- . -
.
, - , ,
. , , , , -
1990 . - , .
, WFSA. -

( -
-. ) 1959 . (

).
(Olga N. Afonin) , -
, 4 .
- , -
, -
- .
,
. - -
. ,
A
61 3
. ,
-
,

.
1969 . -
-
- .
, , -
,
, -
.

(Guillermo Lema)

I
,

, .
XX .

, , . 3-3 Ombredanne
.
, .

1950- .
Ombredanne (. 3-3). , , ,
, ,
1908 . Louis Ombrdanne (1871-1956). - . -
, ,
- .
.* 1950- 1980- .
, -
. , -
, , . 1960- .
. 1963 . - , -
Manuel Arriarn - ,
.
( . , 1970- . -
) . ,
, - . ,
, . - 1970- .,
, , ,
. -
. -

(Yuguang Huang) -
.
XX ., , .
.
- 1950- .,
. - -
, - . , 1959 . -
- Yueqing Ma Yuanchang Wang Tianjin Medical College
, -
. , , ,
, -
1949 . Jue Wu . -
Xingfang Li Rong Xie, Deyan Shang Huiying 1970- .
Tan ,
.
. -
(. 3-4).
*
. .. Ombredanne
1964 .;
, 1953 .,
1127 (. . . .) - A
I 62

. 3-4 , , , 1964. , ,
, 1979; ()

. 1979 .
- :
(). Deyan Shang -
.
3-4.

, - 25 -
Jue Wu, , -,
-.
- , -.
1954. ,
1976 . ,
, , ,
- . , -
. , ,
, , .
(PUMC), : ;
1917 . ,
, -
. PUMC , .
1949 . ;


. India (Deepak K. Tempe)

A .
63 3
. , . -
, , , , -
, .
, ..
, , -
.
- .
, .
ISA, . , ( ),
, - , , -
. ,
: (1) - .

; (2) ; ().
(3) ; (4) -
; (5) , . ( -

I
; (6) ) ,
; (7) ; (8) .
-
; (9) - . ,
; , -
(10) - , -
. .
- , ,
, ,
. , , -
- .
, - , ,
, .
- , ,
, - ,
; .
, ,
. , . -
,
, ,
. -
. (PACU). ,
, (
- ), -
, , .

(. . , ,
PAC). , .
1980-., - ,
PAC, - , - .
( . -
). PAC ,
- - - -
. PAC - , , .
, -
, , -
. , .
, PAC
, .
. , ,
- -
,
(), (
, ).
. -
. ,
. - , . ,
, , -

, ISA . A
I 64

25. , -
, . .
- , -
, -
, . ,
- ,
. ,
, : ( .
, - , -
), , ,
, - . -, , -
. , -
, - ,
-- ,
() , -
, . 25 -
. ,
, , (30%) -
, (20%). , ,
. - , ,
. .
. . , ,
, 20 . ,
,
; , ,
. , , -
.
, - , .
. , , -
, -
, , , . ,
. , -
, , , - , -
( . ,
!) . , -
, ,
- , ,
, - .
. -
, , , -
. -
. , -
: , -
, , - .
. (
, , ,
, )
-
. : . -
1) - ,
(
); 2) - ,
, -
, - . , ,
; 3) .

, 1980-. 3200
- .
. ,
- , -
- .
, 2001 . .

(Olga Afonin)
, ; 1980-. -
A
65 3
- - . , -
,
1 , 2 ( . -
) . - ,
() ,
.
.
. - -
. .
,
-. , -
-
, ,

. . -
- ,

I
-
. ,
. . , ,
1980-. , - , -
, - ,

. ,
- .

. , - (Guillermo Lema)
. 1980-. - 50
,
. 1980-. - , -
.
, -
. ,
, .
,
, . . , -
- , , .
, ,
. - , :
, , - ?
. .
, .
, ,
.
. -
, - , .
, ,
-
. . -
1990-., ,
. , , - . ,
, . , -
, - ,
- .
. , ,
, - , ,
, , , , , --
. ,
.
,
- ; ,
.
.
, (Florian R. Nuevo)
, (ASEAN) -
, , , , ,
, , - , , , . - A
I 66

-
, ,
.
-, -- ,
, - -
. .
,

, -
.
(Deepak K. Tempe)
. -
-
. , ASEAN , , ,
- , -
. ,
-
. - .
- ,
, ,
. ASEAN -
, -
, - . -
. -
.
, , -
, , -
, , , .
, , , ,
, ,
, - .
, . -
, , -
(Lars I. Eriksson Peter Simpson) , .
- ,
, ,
, - . ,
, , , ,
. , -
, , - ,
, 30% , - -
, - . ,
- -
18. , , -

-- .
, , ,
- -
, . , , -
, , , , .
, , , - ,
-- . ,
18. - -
- 100 000 -
, 0,7 4,9 106,4 (AIIMS). -
. -
( ) -- , , ,
. , .
, ,
, 70% ()
, .
20% , 5%
5% 18. - (Anis Baraka)
, ,
(), -
A . , , -
67 3
, ASA. . 3-5
,
-

, -
.

(Guillermo Lema)
, , -
, ,

.
-
,
,
.

I
, -
,

(- )
. 3-5 -
, -

.
,
(, , , , , -
) , , ,
, 27 -
, , , ,
. -
, - . ,
.
-
. , ,
, -
. - ,
. , ,
, , ,
- .19
. , -
.
(Michiaki Yamakage)
(D.G. Bogod)
- Journal of
2007. : 23% , Anesthesia.20
-
1980- .
.
, - . , ,
, - , ,
. 13% , , .
,
.19 . , -
, -
.
-
, . ,
23% , , , , ,
- .
.19 -
(94%) , , -

. . 1980- . -
, -
, .19 ,
D.G. Bogod, ,
, - --
: . A
I 68

1980- . - ,
. , .
- , -
,
-
. , ( , - , ,
), .
,
, . - , , ,
- , -
- , ; -
-
, , - , .
.
,
III
, , , -
,
.

(Deepak K. Tempe)
- -
,
ProSeal (Laryngeal Mask, - . -
), . - -
MD ;
, (MCI),
,
. .
- , -
, ,
- (DNB). , MCI
. (DA) -
, , . .
1992. , -
- .
, , MCI, -
, - -
. . ,
, , 10,

, - , -
, . MCI
. 1998., , -
, MCI
, . -
. - , , MCI -
, , 5
MCI.
. - , ,
, -- . , -
, , ,
- , MCI
. 5 .
, -
50% -
. -
(Ionsys; OrthoMcNeil, ), (, , , -
, - ) .
, , - . -
, -
. . -
-
, , ,
. - MBBS.
, ,
A -,
69 3
, .
, , - ,
20 . .
. 3-1 ,
. ,
MD 2002 2007 . .
. , -
. ;
, , 3 -
( ) . . -

, , -
, - , -
. 6 - . ,
, -, , -
, , , .

I
. , -
10-15 , . -
5 .
269 , , -
30 000 9 100 . ,
. 612
MD 528 . ,
DA . , ,
;
DNB .
, -
; - , ,
DNB 205 . :
, (), () -
, , ().
. , -
28 000 , 7000 (Yuguang Huang)
( ISA -
2007.). -, -
. -
(Anis Baraka) -
. - -
- .
, , - 80000 - (
, - , , 2007).

- (Florian R. Nuevo)
. -
: ,
(Guillermo Lema) . -
,
. -, ,
. ,
. 3-1 , ,

.
(20002-2007)

, ,
-

. , ,

-
2002 228 854 65 98 ;
2004 53 96 .
-
2005 405 642 32 96
2006 160 606 33 99 . , WFSA -

2007 106 504 61 85
().
: ;
140 450 . , ,
, , , ,

. A
I 70

,
() -
. 3-2. ,
, . 3-3.
, WFSA. -
11- -
1970 . , , , . -
--
- ,
- ;
. -
, , , - ;
- () .
. , ,
,
-, -.
. - ,
, , , - , ,
, , , , , . --
16 , . -,

- - --
. . , -
,
, , -
, .
.
, - - . -
. ,
, -
. ,
.
- ,
. , -
ASEAN , , -
. , -.
,
, .
, . -

. 3-2 ,

4 3
; 3

1,5

3,5

/

/
.

/
A
71 3
. 3-3 ,

(, ( (

I
, ) )
) ( )

* , /

, - . , , -
,
, - , -
.
.
/ (D.G. Bogod)
Hodges . 1 - 10,8
91 , - 14,5 100 000 .18,21 ,
. , , , ,
, 6,1
, , 100 000 .18 ,
. , , -
, - .
; , , -
.18 , -
.
(Lars I. Eriksson Peter Simpson) 50% --
, (, )
30 , - , -
- ( 5%)
. , .
, -
, (EDA). EDA,
, - 1984., ,

. - , -
, - .
, , -
, . -
, - ;
, , (, , )
. -
.
- ,
. I
- , , , -
. - - , .
; , -
, , , ,
,
. ,
. ,
- . II
, ,
- , . - A
I 72


, -
, . -
.
, ,
, . -
. ,
, - , , -
, , . -
EDA. EDA -
, , -
, . -
, ,
, -
, ,
. , ,

EDA, ,
, II , .
- , ,
EDA. , -
EDA , , ,
, - , , -
,
. . , , -
, ,
, . -
I EDA , ,
. . , ,
,
, , - , -
, - .

, , , -
; ,
, -- . -
.
ESA/EBA -
(HVAP). HVAP ; -
1996. - , . -
- ,
(ESA, ) -
(EBA). - ; ,
, - , -
,
, .
-
, ,
EBA , -
1996. EDA HVAP , -
- .
. ,
, - -
, . -
( ), . ,
, -
, - .
, -
, - - .
, . -
, -

( ); ,
. (Deepak K. Tempe)
- 20
A . -
73 3
. , - Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 10 ,
, , ,
. AIIMS -
, MEDLINE. ,
1986. - (
. AIIMS 1992.) .
2002.,
Sri Chitra Tirunal () (Anis Baraka)
2003. , -
, (4 - ,
2 ). - , -
, , ,
-
DNB ( ) 2002.; .
4 , ,
18. , ,

I

(Guillermo Lema) ,22-24 -
- , ,25 26,27
. .28
,
(Guillermo Lema)
. , ,
- -
; ,
.
- .
() . -

, - ,
. ,
, , , - (ISI), . -
, - , , -
. ,
. .
, ,
. ,
, - . ,
. , , -
, , -
. - . -
, , , -
.
- , .
, , , -
, .
. -
. , -
, - -
; . ,
, ,
. .

-
- . ,
ISI,
.

(Deepak K. Tempe) (Yuguang Huang)


1947. - (CSA)
19 (1947) 1979. .
12 000 2007.
- . . -
- 3-4. 1986.
(IACTA) 10 , .
. IACTA A
I 74

- , 1979 . ()
( ). ,
WFSA (1976-1980). 400
- , , , -
. - , , , , . -
1986. John Bonica ()
. , , -
, 1997., WFSA.
- CASA .
. -
CASA, -
.
, , .
- CASA
, -
1986 .
1987 . - .
-- ,
. ,
(SARS), -
.
1981 1982., , ASEAN -
. , . -
-
- ,
. 400
. 1000 ,
1990- . ASEAN , , ,
, , , ,
, . . -
- ASEAN, -
, ASA, , , ,
(IARS), - ;
WFSA, ,
(AAGBI), . , .
Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology Anaesthe- - CASA
sia, , - ,
. .
-
. , -
, ,
(Florian R. Nuevo) . ,
-
, - .
ASEAN (AJA)
ASEAN, - 8 . ,
Quintin J. Gomez - Saywan Lim -
.
ASEAN (CASA). - - ASEAN -
1974. - . AJA
- . , -
, WFSA.
CASA ASEAN

.
;
ASEAN. , - (Lars I. Eriksson Peter Simpson)
ASEAN
1978 . -
, .
. , : 1)
, ; 2) -
, ; 3) -
, ; 4)
- -
A . ; 5) -
75 3
,
. , EDA,
, , , HVAP, -
, UEMS.
, , UEMS
- - (EU) -
. 1992 . . UEMS
(ESA). , -
: . -
, -
, .
, , - ,
- - , -
, . . (EBA)
ESA - , -
, - -, - .

I
UEMS -
, EDA, - ; : 1) ,
(EJA) -
, -
UEMS ( ; 2)
). -
, ; 3) , -
, - ,
(CENSA), -
WFSA. ; 4) -
. UEMS
,
, -
, -
, UEMS
. .
1998. ESA, ,
CENSA . . , -
, ( ),
,
2001., - UEMS.
, , , -
, , ESA -
2005 . , ,
2006. ESA
, ,
ESA.
, , . EJA -
- ESA, -
. - - . EJA
CENSA (EACTA, UEMS, FEEA**),
ESA, . -
ESA National. ESA ,
National
. ,
ESA , 19 ,
, .
, :
, - -
. , , , -
- ,
EJA ,
, - ESA -
, , . , EJA, ESA -
. ESA - , ,
, , ESA,
; - .
-
. ,
* , -
, (. . . .)
A
I 76

(-
) -
.
, - , -
,
. . -
, ,
- , ,
. , -
, , -

, , 20 30 . .
, ,
, ,
, - -
. . , ,
, -
, , .
, , -
. -
, ?
, - .
, , -
- -
, , , .


1. Agrawal DP: Susruta: The great surgeon of Yore. AlJadidah, 1982, p 280. 13:325-332, 1996.
Available at http://www.infinityfoundation.com. 12. Haddad FS: The spongia somnifera. Middle East J
22. Baraka A: The Influence of carbon dioxide on the
2. Kothare SN, Pai SA: Sweet slumber. Available at Anesthesiol 17:321-327, 2003.
neuromuscular block caused by tubocurarine
www.histmedindia.org. 13. AlMazrooa AA, AbdelHalim RE: Anesthesia
chloride in the human subject. Br J Anaesth 36:272,
3. Divekar VM, Naik LD: Evolution of anaesthesia in 1000 years ago. In Atkinson RS, Boulton TB (eds):
1964.
India. J Postgrad Med 47:149-152, 2001. The History of Anaesthesia. London, Royal Society
23. Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray C: Stimulus frequency in
4. Jhaveri VK, Tendulkar DG. Escape from death. In of Medicine Services, Parthenon Publishing Group,
the detection of neuromuscular block in humans.
Jhaveri VK, Tendulkar DG (eds): Mahatma: Life of 1989, pp 46-48.
Br J Anaesth 42:967-978, 1970.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, vol 2. The Times 14. Science Timeline: Available at http://www.
24. Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray C: Quantitative assessment
of India, 1951, pp 156-166. sciencetimeline.net/prehistory.htm.
of residual anti depolarizing block (part II). Br J
5. Baraka A: The contributions of Arabs to medicine. 15. Haddad FS: History of anesthesia in Lebanon 1800-
Anaesth 43:478, 1971.
Middle East J Anesthesiol 15:353-359, 2000. 1914. Middle East J Anesthesiol 6:241-280, 1982.
6. Brandt L: The first reported oral intubation of the 16. Takrouri MSM, Seraj MA: Middle Eastern history 25. Baraka A, Noueihid R, Hajj S: Intrathecal injection
human trachea. Anesth Analg 66:1198-1199, 1987. of anesthesia. Middle East J Anesthesiol 15:397- of morphine for obstetric analgesia. Anesthesiology
7. Haddad FS: Ibn Sina (Avicenna) advocated orotra- 413, 2000. 54:136-140, 1981.
cheal intubation 1000 years ago: Documentation of 17. Wright AJ: Diffusion of an innovation: The first 26. Naughton P, Mossad E: Retraining the left ventricle
arabic and Latin originals. Middle East J Anesthe- public demonstration of general anesthesia. Middle after arterial switch operation: Emerging uses for
siol 17:155-162, 2000. East J Anesthesiol 11:93-118, 1991. the left ventricular assist device in pediatric cardiac
8. Haddad SI, Khairallah AA: A forgotten chapter in 18. Egger Halbeis CB, Cvachovec K, Scherpereel P, et surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 14:454-456,
the history of the circulation of the blood. Ann al: Anesthesia workforce in Europe. Eur J Anaes- 2000.
Surg 104:1-8, 1936. thesiol 24:991-1007, 2007. 27. Verghese ST, Hannallah RS: Postoperative pain
9. Takrouri MS, Khalaf M: Ibn al-Nafis contributions 19. Bogod DG: One day for Africa: Anaesthesia in management in children. Anesthesiol Clin North
to science. Middle East J Anesthesiol 17:163-175, Uganda and beyond. Anaesthesia 62:1-3, 2007. Am 23:163-184, 2005.
2003. 20. Yamakage M, Namiki A: Anesthetic practice in 28. Baraka AS, Baroody MA, Haroun ST, et al: Effect
10. Baraka A, Salem MR, Joseph NJ: The origin of the Japan: Past, present, and future. J Anesth 21:390- of alpha-stat versus pH-stat strategy on oxyhemo-
algorithm. Anesthesiology 89:233, 1998. 395, 2007. globin dissociation and whole-body oxygen con-
11. Hunke S: Allah Sonne uber Dem Adenland unser 21. Rolly G, MacRae WR, Blunnie WP, et al: Anaesthe- sumption during hypothermic cardiopulmonary
arabisches Erbe. Beirut, Lebanon, Dar AlKitab siological manpower in Europe. Eur J Anaesthesiol bypass. Anesth Analg 74:32-37, 1992.

A
C. William Hanson
..
..


1. , 5.
, ,
. ,
,
, .
. 6.
2.

,
, , , ,
, .
. 7. HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
3. Act)
, , , ,
,
.
8.
,
, , , , .
, ,
. ,
4. .

.

, ,
.
-
,

,
,
. ,
() , ,
. , , -
- , , .

, -
. .
, - -
, -
. - : , .
, . (. 4-1)
, , , -

77
I 78

1010000110101001110001010
1101010010101011110101010
0010010011111010101000110
1111101010101111000101010 0010010101010010

1101010101010010010101010
()

0100101001001101001001010
1010100010010010101110001
1010100010010010101110001
1110100100100101001010010
1010101000001010100110001 CPU 101 5
RAM
1010101010100010100100101 . 4-1
1111010010010100011001010 .
1101001010010100100100010 (), . RAM
0010101001001001000010100 (5) (10)

1111111010100010100010010
0010101001001001000010100 01001001010010101
1111111010100010100010010
0000001001001001001001010
1010010010010010010010101

, - .
. (CISC)
, . ,
, (RISC), -
, - . ,
,
. , - (,
, ) ,
, - .
.
, -
.
( ),

, . -
, , , ,
. , ,
, -- ( ) (-
, -, -).
- , -
-
. , , , -
, , -
, , -
, , . ,
. .
, ,
,
, -
, - ,
. , .
, ,
- ,
. . -

. ,
, , , - ,
, - ,
, , , -
, , , -
, , , ,
. - (. 4-2).
, -
. .
, -
, . - , -
, Intel, , - . -
, , ,
A . .
79 4
, 10 ,
, , -
,

2 , -
, . ,
- DVD-, -
,
L2

,
: .
;
.



, -
, .
L1 ,

,
,

I
. -

<<<

. 4-2 .
,

,
,
- .
,
, - (. 4-3). -
. -
. , ,
(SRAM), - , , -
, .
(DRAM). () ,
(RAM): , , -
( - .
), 8- ,
, Pentium 64- .
. - -
, - ,
, , , -
. . -
5 .
( ). (USB) -
400 , -

. 4-3 ,
A
I 80



. 4-4 , .

Apple Firewire. . Xerox,


-
, ARPAnet,
, , -
, - . ,
, - , ()
. , .
, -
, , - , . -
, , ,
, - , . -
. (. 4-4) -
, ,
.
- , .
. ,
, - ,
(, ), ,
, . - -
. IP ,
(Internet Protocol) MAC (Media Access Control) . .
IP- -
( ), -
.

- ,
,
IP-.

- () -
-. . ,
-
, , -
. , ,
- . ,
, - , ,
, , ,
, - , .
- ,
, .
, .
,
. Apple Windows,
. - , -
Palo Alto, . Linux ,
.. , ,
Xerox, - ,
. Ethernet
, -, -
A - . ,
81 4

-
.
,
,

. -
, , -
,
. ,
.
: ,
,
(GUI).

I

World Wide
Web. ,

-
-. -
, ,


. , ,
. 4-5 -
, -
, , .
, Simple Message Transfer Protocol
, . (SMTP) ( ),
.
(. 4-5). , , - -
, (, Outlook, Gmail).
, - -
. , . -
, , ,
, - ,
, , - , .
.
-
, - ,
, , -
, , ,
, . ,
, , - .
- , ,
*. ,
. , -
: - , .
, , ,
, , - SMTP.
. -
, , , ,

.
-
(American Medical Informatics Association)
, -
.

-
-
,
. 4-6
* (Monty Python) -
,
(. .)
A
I 82

. 4-7

- 4-1
.1 -

.2-5 -
, .
.
( , ).
, .
-, , -

.
( ) .
, -
.6-9
,
, .
(. 4-6), ()

: . .
- online
- .
,
. , . (, -
- :), ,
( , , .
). ,
- , -

. (. 4-7). -
,
, , - ,
, - . -
.10
. - ,
, - .
, ,
, -
--



. , -
, -

, -
, ,

.
-
-
HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act). -
. 4-8 :
, , 152- 27.07.2006. -
A , ,

: -
83 4
(
, -
, ), -
(
) . -
,
.
,

-
.
, -



(),

( ),

I
(. 4-8).
-

, , . 4-9 -, ,
,
.
HTML -
- --
, .
, - , Java, JavaScript, ActiveX,
, - Flash ,
, , HTML. ,
, , - -
. , .
,
- .
. , -
4-1. ,
-
(, Google) -
,
. ,
, , , -
(WWW) . - (.
, - 4-9). ,
, , - .
. , -
- , ,
, CERN, 1990. - . -
Mosaic, , , ,
, , - -,
, , -
-
(HTML). - .
, Internet -
Explorer, . , -
- ,
, - .
, .
,
,
. -
, -

.
-
( , )
, -
HTML. -,
,
, . A
I 84






,
ADT

. 4-10

, .
ADT admission, discharge, and transfer
(,
) ,

. 4-11

, , -
, , . -
, - , ,
, , ,
interface engine , -
, ,
.
. 11-14 (. 4-10),
- (backbone network),
, - (VPN),

. , .16

, -
, , -
-.15-17
(. . 99) -
, -: -
. - , ,
-
.18 ().20-23 ,
HL7 (Health Level 7) , ,
.24,25
. -
( CCOW) , , -
- 1980- 1990- .
,
, . -
- (anesthesia
EHR26,27 ICU EHR) (. 4-11).
(SNOMED) - -
( ).19 .
- : -
A ,
85 4

.* , ,
(Institute of Medicine - -
, , -
) , - ,
. (, , , -
: , - , ),
; (,
, - ).
, ; ,
, , -
; , - (. . 4-12).
, , ,
, .
.
. , -

I
.
. - -
- ().
,
. ,
Veterans Health Administration (VHA .
) . -
; , ,
, - , -
. , - . -
- ,
, , ,
. . , -
-
, , ,
, , - .
.28-30
, - . ,
.31,32 , ,
- ,
, , , .
, - , -
, , , -,
(. 4-12). .
, -
, , Microsoft Google,

. , , (Medical Vaults),
,
, Medicare. .

* -
( 52636-2006)
(. .) ()

-
,
50% . -


, -

.

1999 . :
,
, 44000 98000

, ,
. 4-12 , - A
I 86

,
.

,

, -

-
.
, ,

(. 4-13).

(),
.
,
-
- . 4-14 ()
.
-

(AMIA American Medical Informatics Association),
, - /
. -


,
, . , -
, -
- ,
. -, , -
- ,
, . - .
.
, , -
, -
(. 4-14). ,
. ,
-
, ,
, , - .
. .
- - , -
, , . -
. ,
, , -
. . ,
.
, ,
,
.


,


,

. 4-15 HIPAA
. 4-13
A ()


87 4

. 4-16

I

.
-
, , - , -
, , , , . -

, , , , ,
, , , ,
(, ), ,
. , .26,39-50 ,
-
. , -

, , , -
HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act)* .

-
1996. HIPAA
- ,
- .
, , ,
. HIPAA . -
: - -
, -
.33-38 ,
, -
, , -

, (. 4-16).
. HIPAA
, , , , -
, - -
.
. ,
, , , -
. .
, , - ,
, -
(. 4-15). , -
,
* HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability ,
Act) , 1996. , -
. .
, ,
. .
, ,
,
.
.51

152- 27.07.2006 (. .)
A
I 88


1. Kane B, Sands DZ: Guidelines for the clinical use that tie into other HR software. Healthc Inform 34. Hodge JG Jr, Brown EF, OConnell JP, et al: The
of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet 24:22, 24, 2007. HIPAA privacy rule and bioterrorism planning,
Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the 18. Khoumbati K, Themistocleous M, Irani Z, et al: prevention, and response. Biosecurity Bioterrorism
Use of ClinicPatient Electronic Mail. JAMIA Investigating enterprise application integration 2:73-80, 2004.
5:104-111, 1998. benefits and barriers in healthcare organisations: 35. Hodge JG Jr: Health information privacy and
2. Bones E, Hasvold P, Henriksen E, et al: Risk analysis An exploratory case study. Int J Electron Healthc public health. J Law Med Ethics 31:663-671, 2003.
of information security in a mobile instant messag- 2:66-78, 2006. 36. Kulynych J, Korn D: The new HIPAA (Health
ing and presence system for healthcare. Int J Med 19. Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Johnson KB, et al: Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
Inform 76:677-687, 2007. Interface terminologies: Facilitating direct entry of 1996) Medical Privacy Rule: Help or hindrance for
3. Car J, Sheikh A: Email consultations in health care: clinical data into electronic health record systems. clinical research? Circulation 108:912-914, 2003.
1scope and effectiveness. BMJ 329:435-438, J Am Med Inform Assoc 13:277-288, 2006. 37. Liang BA: Medical information, confidentiality,
2004. 20. Mehta NB, Partin MH: Electronic health records: and privacy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am
4. Car J, Sheikh A: Email consultations in health care: A primer for practicing physicians. Cleve Clin J 16:1433-1447, 2002.
2acceptability and safe application. BMJ 329:439- Med 74:826-830, 2007. 38. Willerson JT, Kereiakes DJ: Clinical research and
442, 2004. 21. Menachemi N, Brooks RG: Reviewing the benefits future improvement in clinical care: The Health
5. Stiles RA, Deppen SA, Figaro MK, et al: Behind- and costs of electronic health records and associ- Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
the-scenes of patient-centered care: Content analy- ated patient safety technologies. J Med Syst 30:159- (HIPAA) and future difficulties but optimism for
sis of electronic messaging among primary care 168, 2006. the way forward. Circulation 108:919-920, 2003.
clinic providers and staff. Med Care 45:1205-1209, 22. Steward M: Electronic medical records. Privacy, 39. Anvari M: Remote telepresence surgery: The Cana-
2007. confidentiality, liability. J Legal Med 26:491-506, dian experience. Surg Endosc 21:537-541, 2007.
6. McGeady D, Kujala J, Ilvonen K, et al: The impact 2005. 40. Brignell M, Wootton R, Gray L, et al: The applica-
of patient-physician web messaging on healthcare 23. Stewart WF, Shah NR, Selna MJ, et al: Bridging the tion of telemedicine to geriatric medicine. Age
service provision. Int J Med Inform 77:17-23, 2008. inferential gap: The electronic health record and Ageing 36:369-374, 2007.
7. Robeznieks A: Dont LOL at virtual visits. Technol- clinical evidence. Health Affairs 26:w181-w191, 41. Burdick AE: Teledermatology: Extending specialty
ogy is allowing more doctors and patients to 2007. care beyond borders. Arch Dermatol 143:1581-
consult via e-mail, and insurance companies are 24. Bria WF 2nd, Shabot MM: The electronic medical 1582, 2007.
reimbursing for it. Mod Healthc 37:6-7, 2007. record, safety, and critical care. Crit Care Clin 42. Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, et al: Tel-
8. Stalberg P, Yeh M, Ketteridge G, et al: E-mail access 21:55-79, 2005. emedicine for the Medicare population: Update.
and improved communication between patient and 25. OMeara E: The effects of electronic documentation Evidence Report/Technology Assessment1-41,
surgeon. Arch Surg 143:164-168, 2008. in the ambulatory surgery setting. AORN J 86:970- 2006.
9. Stone JH: Communication between physicians and 979, 2007. 43. Jaana M, Par G: Home telemonitoring of patients
patients in the era of E-medicine. N Engl J Med 26. Breslow MJ: Remote ICU care programs: current with diabetes: A systematic assessment of observed
356:2451-2454, 2007. status. J Crit Care 22:66-76, 2007. effects. J Eval Clin Pract 13:242-253, 2007.
10. Johnson LJ: Patient e-mail perils. Med Econom 27. Williams JR: Anesthesia information management 44. Karunanithi M: Monitoring technology for the
84:30, 2007. systems. AANA J 73:178-181, 2005. elderly patient. Expert Rev Med Devices 4:267-277,
11. By the numbers. Information systems. Mod 28. Agrawal R, Johnson C, Agrawal R, et al: Securing 2007.
Healthc Suppl 58:16, 18, 20-22, 1960. electronic health records without impeding the 45. Latifi R, Weinstein RS, Porter JM, et al: Telemedi-
12. Lawrence D: Next generation EDIS. The classic flow of information. Int J Med Inform 76:471-479, cine and telepresence for trauma and emergency
best of breed vs. enterprise discussion is alive and 2007. care management. Scand J Surg 96:281-289, 2007.
well among EDIS buyers. Healthc Inform 24:12, 14, 29. Bakker AR: The need to know the history of the use 46. Par G, Jaana M, Sicotte C, et al: Systematic review
16, 2007. of digital patient data, in particular the EHR. Int J of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: The
13. Reichertz PL: Hospital information systemspast, Med Inform 76:438-441, 2007. evidence base. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:269-277,
present, future. Int J Med Inform 75:282-299, 2006. 30. Studer M: The effect of organizational factors on 2007.
14. Haux R: Health information systemspast, the effectiveness of EMR system implementation 47. Peake SL, Judd N: Supporting rural community-
present, future. Int J Med Inform 75:268-281, 2006. what have we learned? Healthc Q 8:92-98, 2005. based critical care. Curr Opin Crit Care 13:720-
15. Hsieh SL, Lai F, Cheng PH, et al: An integrated 31. Walsh KE, Landrigan CP, Adams WG, et al: Effect 724, 2007.
healthcare enterprise information portal and of computer order entry on prevention of serious 48. Shore JH, Hilty DM, Yellowlees P, et al: Emergency
healthcare information system framework. In Con- medication errors in hospitalized children. Pediat- management guidelines for telepsychiatry. Gen
ference Proceedings: Annual International Confer- rics 121:e421-e427, 2008. Hosp Psychiatry 29:199-206, 2007.
ence of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & 32. Walsh SH: The clinicians perspective on electronic 49. Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo, S et al: What is telemedi-
Biology Society, New York, 2006, pp 4731-4734. health records and how they can affect patient care. cine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspec-
16. Moran EB, Tentori M, Gonzalez VM, et al: Mobility BMJ 328:1184-1187, 2004. tives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemed J
in hospital work: Towards a pervasive computing 33. Califf RM, Muhlbaier LH: Health Insurance Port- E-Health 13:573-590, 2007.
hospital environment. Int J Electron Healthc 3:72- ability and Accountability Act (HIPAA): Must 50. Thrall JH: Teleradiology. Part I. History and clinical
89, 2007. there be a trade-off between privacy and quality of applications. Radiology 243:613-617, 2007.
17. Raths D: Getting on schedule. Hospitals are health care, or can we advance both? Circulation 51. Anderson JG: Social, ethical and legal barriers to
dumping manual scheduling for automated systems 108:915-918, 2003. e-health. Int J Med Inform 76:480-483, 2007.

A
Eugenie S. Heitmiller, Elizabeth A. Martinez Peter J. Pronovost
..
..


1. , ,
, .
6.
.
, ,
. ,
2. .
, 7. :
, ,
, , , ,
,
, /
. ,
3. ;
.
, .
, 8. ,
, -
,
,
. .
4. 9. ,
.
: , ,

, ,
, .
, .

10.
,

.

5. :
,
, .
.
, ,

. .
( ), ( )
( )

() ,
.
Medicare Medicaid Services . -
(CMS) - (Agency for Healthcare
, - Research and Quality) A

89
I 90

-
-, .
- . 2001. *
( )
, - 4.
. .

, (
) , -
. ,
, .
- -
,
,
. , , , ,
, , . : -
, , -
. 5-7.
,
,
, ,
? -
, -
, 8.
.
,
.
-
. , .

,
.

() 1999. . ,
1. , -
, - , -
, , -
, -
. . , -
, , . ,
. ,
1900- . Dr. Ernest Codman, -
, ,
, - ,
,
2. - . ,
(,
, ), , -
. - ( ).
() ,
- ,
, (ASA) 1985 .
. , 9. -
, , -

. - , -
, .
, , ,
. , -
. , ,
- . ,
. .
, .
, ,
- -
, , - * Start-up
A 3. (. .)
91 2
10. , . -
ASA (, -
,
. , ), , -
- . Brennan
, Caplan . 1990 .11, - .,
ASA, 21.
12,13, W. Edwards Deming,
, -
1995 . (http://www.das.uk.com) 14. ,
- .
,
15. ,
,
, -
, - 22. -

I
16. Langley .23
:
, - (1) (, , ),
(2) (-
, .
- -?),
, (3) (
, ,
17. , - ).
, -
,
,
, , - . -
. - .
, -
. . -
, ,
. Avedis Donabedian
. -
Intensive Care Unit Safety Reporting System . 1980- .
(ICUSRS) - , (-
18. ),
ICUSRS - ( -
, )
, - ( );
. -
- 24,25. -
:
(Society of Critical Care Medicine), - -, -
, ;
, - -, -
. ICUSRS -
(ICU) ,
- ;
-, ,
19,20. ,
23.
. -
26.


, -
(, , -
,
/ ), (--
. )
, ( /
, )27,28. - A
I 92

29. , , , ,
.
, , , ,
, , -
. , -
,
, , .
29.
,
. - , -
. ,
.
,
, ,
30. .
, -
, .
. , -
: (1) , , -
. ,
(
, (2) ) 3
, . ( -
, , - ). -

30. (
, , ,
- - ) .
:
. - .
,
(), , , , , -
, 31. , , .
,

()
, , ,
-
()32. , ,
, - ,

.


. (x)
, , (y)
95
(. 5-1). -
,
90 , , -
-

.
85
, ,
, .
80

( -
75 ).
, , ?
,
70 .
, , -
-
, , 33. , ,
. 5-1 , - ,
. (x) , - , .
A (y)

93 2
, - . 5-1 ,
34. , - ,
-

.
,
,
, . - -

, ,
,
.
- ,
.



; ,

,
(,

I
,
). ,

, -



,
. , ,
-
, -
, , 1-2
.
, , ,
.
, , ,
.
-

.
,
()
. -

,
-
- ;

, ,
, . -
, , -
, 1997. Lundberg , ,
& Wennberg35. , ,
.

, -
, .
-, ,
, -
.
.
Zosyn,
-
, . , Zosyn
, - -
.
. - ,
-
1-
. - .
,
, -
( ), .
Zosyn (piperacillin/
tazobactam) , .
. , A
I 94

. 5-2 ,
, , -

,
1. ,

. -
.
2. , , ,
,
.
3. :
, -
?
- ?
-

4. , () , -
,
, : .
- . ,
, (1)
- , ,
, , -
- -
-
, (2)


( ,
- ).
( ) . ,
() -
5. -

.
. -
:
-
. -
- , (,
) -
, ,
. , -
6. ;
,
,
26,36.
, -
, --
. ,
,
, Zosyn , - , ,
. -
, -
. , , ,
, . -
- , ( -
- , )
. -
, -
, , ( , ,
, ( ).
Zosyn , Pronovost ,
, , , ,
, 37,38.
).
( , 1. -
, ,
, - .
, 2. ,
, ,
, ). . -
,
. , ( -
A ) -
95 2
.
3. , - .
(), -
. , -
4. , , .
, -
. ,
5. , - , ,
, , -
: , . -
, (. 5-1). , ,
, ,
20%
.
: -;

I
.

() - .
,
- . , -
(. 5-2)39,40. , -
- 35% 60% 39,41. ,
(..
)39,41. . ,
,
, - , -
. - , -
, ,
, , -
42,43. , -
- ,
- 46. ,

. .
. - , -
,
-
. - .
, , -
(1) , -
, (2)
(3) ,
. . -
,
- ,
. -
, .

. , :
, -
? ?
- -
(, ,
, -, ) -
- .
, .
-
, -
2001 .
, .
- , -
, - 44. -
, , ,
, (. ), ,
44,45. A
I 96

pp
, ?


? ?
?
?
___/10
___p
- p / p
+_____ -_____
__________
p
: , , p /

// p /
p/
T>39 <36, >90,
p
>20 2<32, p2- //
p
L>12000 <4000 p
/ ? /
//: p
, , ? p per os/ .
/ ? /
, ,
?
/


/Rg ?

?

?
?
/ ?

. 5-2 (). , ,
, . -

(. 5-2). -
, - 2,2 1,1 44.

, .
- , , -
, - , -
. .
, , -

- , -
: ? 45,47,48.
, -
? - . ;
- , ,
. ,
, 10% (. 5-3).
-
, ( )
; , /
( ) ();
, , ,
, . - , ,
4 , .
95% (, -
. , ), (, -
A ) .
97 2
:
: , ,
: , ( ),
, ,
( ),
, , ,
?
?
?
-?
, ?
, , ?
?
?
? , . . 5-3
,

I
?
, .
? , -
?
:
?
?
, ,
? (.. )
? ?
?
p ?
p ?
p ?
p , ?
p ?
p -?
p ?
p ?

( - , , 50,51. , -
?), .
.



,

.

, -
, , : -
, , (guidelines)
49. ,
, -
, , , , -
-
. , , ( CMS
, - )
, . ,
. AHRQ (
, - ), CMS
- (NQF), , -
. 52.
66%-
, 2,7 1000 - , -
- 0 ,
, A
I 98

. 5-3 ,

-
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality www.ahrq.gov ,
(AHRQ) ,
American Health Quality Association (AHQA) www.ahqa.org ,

Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) www.apsf.org ,

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) www.cdc.gov

Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI) www.ecri.org , ,


, ,

Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) www.ihi.org , ,

Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) www.ismp.org ,


Medicare Quality Improvement Community www.medquic.org
(MedQIC)
National Quality Forum www.qualityforum.org
()
National Patient Safety Foundation (NPSF) www.npsf.org ,

-
, - ( ),
, -
53,54. - . NQF-
, -
. -
, .
, - ,

55,56. , - -
.

57.
Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP)
,
,
(www.medqic.org),
CMS,
2003 .
- ,
, - ( 5-1), -
, , -
, ,
(. 5-3). , -
, , ,
(www.jcaho.org).
ORYX , ,
(Medicare).

. 2004.
CMS
, ,
.
NQF ( ). .
NQF , , - Leapfrog . -
, - Leapfrog

A (www.qualityforum.org). - : (1)
99 2

5-1

: 24
: ,
1
30 ()
,

24 30 ()
(48 )
:
,
06-00
( 0) 7
()
, -

I

()

-
- :
( 0) 7
, -
,

, - (
)

- , :
30
30 () 30

():
,

, ,
24 -

(www.jointcommission.org). , , -
( ), (2) - , -
, (3) , .
(4) ,
Leapfrog Safe Practices, - , -
NQF- ( .
) (www.leapfroggroup.org). Leapfrog
, -
, CMS
, -
. .
,
.
- ASA -
(www.asahq.
, , . org, 9 2007):
()
, , - 1.
. - .
2. .
, 3.
, .
4. -
. , , .
- 5. .
- , ,
. - A
I 100

. 5-4
-
59. ,

-
ACGME ,
-
1. (ACGME)60,
2. 4 (. 5-4).
-
3.
, Bingham . -

,
4.
5.
61.
6.

,
, .
ASA
.
, - -
. -
, , ,
- -
( , ), 62. -
51,58. ,
, -
, , -
,
, -
: , .
, -
, -
- ,
. , -
, - ,
. .

. ,
,
,
,
. , -
, : (1)
. - , (2)
, , (3) -
, . -
. ,
,
. -
, - -
, ,
. , -

. - 63. , -
, , ,
, (
, - ). , -
, - , ,
, ,
. , , . -
, ,
, , , , -
, .
- -
.
A . .
101 2

1. Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M: To Err Is Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to ing communication in the ICU using daily goals. J
Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washing- Enhancing Organizational Performance. New York, Crit Care 18:71-75, 2003.
ton, DC, Institute of Medicine, National Academy JosseyBass, 1996, p 370. 45. Thompson D, Holzmueller C, Hunt D, et al: A
Press, 1999. 24. Donabedian A: An Introduction to Quality Assur- morning briefing: Setting the stage for a clinically
2. Codman EA: The product of a hospital: Surgery. ance in Health Care, 44th ed. New York, Oxford and operationally good day. Jt Comm J Qual Patient
Surg Gynecol Obstet 18:491-496, 1914. University Press, 2003, p 200. Saf 31:476-479, 2005.
3. Berwick DM: A primer on leading the improve- 25. Donabedian A: Evaluating the quality of medical 46. Pronovost PJ, Holzmueller CG, Martinez E, et al: A
ment of systems. BMJ 312:619-622, 1996. care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 44(Suppl)206, 1966. practical tool to learn from defects in patient care.
4. Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm: 26. Ovretveit J, Bate P, Cleary P, et al: Quality collabora- Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 32:102-108, 2006.
A New Health System for the 21st Century. Wash- tives: Lessons from research. Qual Saf Health Care 47. Makary MA, Holzmueller CG, Sexton JB, et al:
ington, DC, National Academy Press, 2001. 11:345-351, 2002. Operating room debriefings. Jt Comm J Qual
5. Chassin MR, Galvin RW: The urgent need to 27. Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Mohr JJ, Plume SK: Build- Patient Saf 32:407-410, 357, 2006.
improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine ing a quality future. Front Health Serv Manage 48. Makary MA, Holzmueller CG, Thompson D, et al:
National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. 15:3-32, 1998.
Operating room briefings: Working on the same
JAMA 280:1000-1005, 1998. 28. Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Homa K, et al: Microsys-
page. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 32:351-355, 2006.
6. Presidents Advisory Commission on Consumer tems in health care: Part 2. Creating a rich informa-
49. March MG, Crowley JJ: An evaluation of anesthe-
Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry: tion environment. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 29:5-15,

I
siologists present checkout methods and the valid-
Quality First: Better Health Care for All Americans 2003.
ity of the FDA checklist. Anesthesiology 75:724-729,
(Publication No. 5-25-0001). Washington, DC, U.S. 29. Rubin HR, Pronovost P, Diette GB: The advantages
1991.
Government Printing Office, 1998. and disadvantages of process-based measures of
50. Berenholtz S, Pronovost PJ, Lipsett PA: Eliminating
7. Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH: How good health care quality. Int J Qual Health Care 13:469-
catheter-related bloodstream infections in the
is the quality of health care in the United States? 474, 2001.
Milbank Q 76:517-563, 509, 1998. 30. Pronovost PJ, Miller MR, Dorman T, et al: Develop- intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 32:2014-2020,
8. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al: The quality ing and implementing measures of quality of care 2004.
of health care delivered to adults in the United in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 51. Freund PR, Posner KL: Sustained increases in pro-
States. N Engl J Med 348:2635-2645, 2003. 7:297-303, 2001. ductivity with maintenance of quality in an aca-
9. Cheney FW, Posner K, Caplan RA, Ward RJ: Stand- 31. Lenfant C: Shattuck lectureclinical research to demic anesthesia practice. Anesth Analg
ard of care and anesthesia liability. JAMA 261:1599- clinical practicelost in translation? N Engl J Med 96:1104-1108, 2003.
1603, 1989. 349:868-874, 2003. 52. Miller T, Leatherman S: The National Quality
10. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Gawande AA, et al: Dis- 32. OGrady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EI, et al: Forum: A me-too or a breakthrough in quality
closure of medical injury to patients: An improba- Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular cath- measurement and reporting? Health Aff (Mill-
ble risk management strategy. Health Aff eter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control wood) 18:233-237, 1999.
(Millwood) 26:215-226, 2007. and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 51(RR- 53. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al: Evi-
11. Caplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, Cheney FW: 10):1-29, 2005. dence based medicine: What it is and what it isnt.
Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: A closed 33. Plsek PE: Tutorial: Planning for data collection. BMJ 312:71-72, 1996.
claims analysis. Anesthesiology 72:828-833, 1990. Part IIISample size. Qual Manage Health Care 54. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, et al:
12. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult 3:78-92, 1994. Making health care safer: A critical analysis of
airway. A report by the American Society of Anes- 34. Shewhart W: Statistical Method: From the View- patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess
thesiologists Task Force on Management of the Dif- point of Quality Control, the Graduate School. (Summ) i-668, 2001.
ficult Airway. Anesthesiology 78:597-602, 1993. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 55. Brook AD, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, et al: Effect of a
13. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult 1939. nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the
airway: An updated report by the American Society 35. Lundberg GD, Wennberg JE: A JAMA theme issue duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med
of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of on quality of care. A new proposal and a call to 27:2609-2615, 1999.
the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 98:1269-1277, action. JAMA 278:1615-1616, 1997. 56. Marelich GP, Murin S, Battistella F, et al: Protocol
2003. 36. Mills PD, Weeks WB: Characteristics of successful weaning of mechanical ventilation in medical and
14. Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC: Dif- quality improvement teams: Lessons from five col- surgical patients by respiratory care practitioners
ficult Airway Society guidelines for management of laborative projects in the VHA. Jt Comm J Qual Saf and nurses: Effect on weaning time and incidence
the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 30:152-162, 2004. of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 118:459-
59:675-694, 2004. 37. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz S, Goeschel C: Creating 467, 2000.
15. Mark L, Akst S, Michaelson J: Difficult airway/intu- high reliability in healthcare organizations. Health
57. Wang FL, Lee LC, Lee SH, et al: Performance evalu-
bation implications for anesthesia. In Cummings Serv Res 41:1599-1617, 2006.
ation of quality improvement team in an anesthesi-
Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 4th ed. St. 38. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al: An
ology department. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 41:13-19,
Louis, Elsevier Mosby, 2004, pp 232-273. intervention to decrease catheter-related blood-
2003.
16. Leape LL: Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J stream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med
58. Bierstein K: Anesthesiology is in the P4P game.
Med 347:1633-1638, 2002. 355:2725-2732, 2006.
ASA Newsl 70:28-31, 2006.
17. Vincent C: Understanding and responding to 39. Pronovost PJ, King J, Holzmueller CG, et al: A web-
59. Dubin SA, Jense HG, Yodlowski E, McCranie JM:
adverse events. N Engl J Med 348:1051-1056, 2003. based tool for the Comprehensive UnitBased
Continuous quality improvement in an anesthesia
18. Wu AW, Pronovost P, Morlock L: ICU incident Safety Program (CUSP). Jt Comm J Qual Patient
reporting systems. J Crit Care 17:86-94, 2002. Saf 32:119-129, 2006. residency training program. Int Anesthesiol Clin
19. Thompson DA, Lubomski L, Holzmueller C, et al: 40. Pronovost P, Goeschel C: Improving ICU care: It 30:29-43, 1992.
Integrating the intensive care unit safety reporting takes a team. Healthcare Exec 20:14-16, 18, 20, 60. Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Educa-
system with existing incident reporting systems. Jt 2005. tion (ACGME): The project: Introduction. Availa-
Comm J Qual Patient Saf 31:585-593, 2005. 41. Pronovost P, Weast B, Rosenstein B, et al: Imple- ble at http://www.acgme.org. Accessed 2001.
20. Vincent C, TaylorAdams S, Stanhope N: Frame- menting and validating a comprehensive unit- 61. Bingham JW, Quinn DC, Richardson MG, et al:
work for analysing risk and safety in clinical medi- based safety program. J Patient Saf 1:33-40, 2005. Using a healthcare matrix to assess patient care in
cine. BMJ 316:1154-1157, 1998. 42. Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB, et al: The terms of aims for improvement and core competen-
21. Brennan TA, Gawande A, Thomas E, Studdert D: Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: Psychometric prop- cies. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 31:98-105, 2005.
Accidental deaths, saved lives, and improved erties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. 62. Baily M, Bottrell M, Lynn J, Jennings B: The Ethics
quality. N Engl J Med 353:1405-1409, 2005. BMC Health Serv Res 6:44, 2006. of Using QI Methods to Improve Health Care
22. Magnier M: The 50 people who most influenced 43. Colla JB, Bracken AC, Kinney LM, Weeks WB: Quality. The Hastings Center Report. 36:S1-S40,
business this century. Los Angeles Times Home, Measuring patient safety climate: A review of 2006.
October 10, 1999:U-8. surveys. Qual Saf Health Care 14:364-366, 2005. 63. McGlynn EA, Asch SM: Developing a clinical per-
23. Langley GJ, Nolan KM, Nolan IW, et al: The 44. Pronovost P, Berenholtz S, Dorman T, et al: Improv- formance measure. Am J Prev Med 14:14-21, 1998.

A
Marcus Rall, David M. Gaba, Steve K. Howard Peter Dieckmann
..
.. ..


1. )
, .
. 6.
, ,
, ,
. ,
.
.
7. ,
2. ,
,
(. performance-shaping
factors), , ,
(, .
,
8.
).

3. ,
, (. task analysis).

9.
.

,
(

)
.

4. , , .
,
10.
,



.
,
5.
.
.
(. traps), (,


-
.

, -
- ,
-
. .1,2 (Institute of Medicine,
70% - IOM) : ,
. -
.3,4 -
- ,
, ; , -
,
. : - ( , zero

103
I 104

vision, - ,
(Anesthesia Patient Safety
Foundation, APSF): - , -
). Cooper Gaba1 : - .
, ,
, , (
18-26), -
,
. . , -
- -
( ) .
, ,
, .
.
- .27-38
(. postanes-
thesia care unit, PACU),
(. intensive care unit, ICU), ,
,
.

(ICU)
.5-17
- , -
,
, , - , , -
, - . -

- .39
, . ,
- -
, - *,
, , ,
- (. certified registered nurse
anesthetist, CRNA) . . -
, - , -
-
.
- .39 Orasanu .39 -
, ,
-
. - . -
:
.
, , 1. .
, , -
,
. , - . , -
, -
. - .
, .
, ,
. .
( 2. .
) - ; ,
, ,
,
. .
-
, , , , , -
, , . , -
25 .
- -
- , ,
. . 7 -

A - * T. Kelly, L. Thurstone(. .)
105 6
(,
). - . -
(
)
, - .
. , 7. . -
, . -
- .
, .
. -
, -
, -

, .
, , - 8. .
, , - -

I
. , -
- , .
, ,
, -
- .
. -
.
, , -
. , -
3. . - . , ,
, - -
. , , ,
- , .

, ,

.
4. , -

.
(, - (. . 99-101)
, ,
) - :
. -
.
, -
.
5. : / . - - (. cognitive engi-
neers), , -
, . .
,
; ,
. - , ,
, , -
.
. , -
6. . , , -
,
. , Reason40-43,
, . Cook, Woods McDonald44, ,
, -
, , , ,
. - , , -
, , ,
, .
. . -
, . -

,
, - , . -
A
I 106

, - , ,
, . , - -
Columbia : , ,
- , -
- .
(National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, NASA): , ,
, Reason -
, - , (resident
, , NASA pathogens). -
.45 , ,
,

, .
, - (. 6-2).
, (threat and error model)
. -
Robert Helmreich
( - (. 6-3).47
),
- .
. - ,
, . -
, - , -
. ,
, :
.46 -
. 6-1. - .

, -
. James Reason, ,
(University of Manchester, England) -
, 46: . -
.
,
, , -
, -
, - . -
, . , ,

:
-22*,
, -
: ! (e safe!).
-
, ,
A
: , . Cook, Woods McDonald44 ,

,
1 4 . , -
(.. )
2
,
3 5 .

B ,
, ,
. 6-1 () .
.
, , (Reasons
. (1, 2, accident trajectory) . 6-2.
3) (B). ,
, -
(4, 5). -
* . Catch-22
,
,
Joseph Heller (1961), --
, . (
Rall ., Manser T., Guggenberger H., et al.: Patient safety and errors
,
A in medicine: Development, prevention and analyses of incidents. Ansthesiologie,
Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie 36:321-330, 2001) (. . .)
107 6
?
.

-
,
.3,25,42,48-52
(IOM) -


(To Err Is Human)3,
1999 . , -

. ,
,


. 6-2 James Reasons - , -

I
. -

-
, -
. .
. ,
, -
. 6-1.
e
(shields),

() . ( Reason J.T.: Human Error. IOM, -
Cambridge,Cambridge University Press,1990)*
XXI. (Crossing the Quality Chasm A New Health System
*
(. . . .) for the 21st Century)48,
. ,
, , -
, ,
, ,
,
.
: -
.
(. 6-1)46 - .
; .
-
. - .
, . ,
. -
.
, , , (normal acci-


, , ,
,




()

. 6-3 . , , -
. ( http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/misc/bmj.320.7237.781/sld001.htm.)
A
I 108

. 6-1 .
,

, -
(.
. 6-2).

,
- .
(
, ,
Perrow ,
)
.57 -
, -

,

,
(, ( )
),
.
.

( :
,
)


(, ,
, ) () .58
--
, , ,
,
, -
: Reason JT: Human Error. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Boeing-747 .
1990 -
.58
, , -
dent theory, NAT) .
(high-reliability organization theory, HROT), - -, ,
- .
20 .43-52,60 NAT ,
Charles Perrow57
,
, -
, - . Galletly Mushet59
. HROT - ,

. , - , -
, ,
, , .
, ( - -
, personal communication, Karlene Roberts). ,
.
. 6-2. NAT , ,

(NAT) 6-1

NAT
: (1) -
(2) .
. ,
, .
. ,
, - .
, -
,

,
.
.
-
, -
.
, ,
A , .
109 6
. 6-2 -
(HROT)
(NAT)
, , -
,
e .
, HROT , NAT
, -
- ,
e .

Vaughan ,
Challenger -
, , -
,
. ,

; ,

( ; ,
) -

I
e e e , -
(social-shirking) ,
NASA, -
(cue-taking behavior) . , -
: Columbia.45
,
.
,

-

(HROT)
e
e ,
-
-
HROT,
, -
, -
, , ,
e . , -
, -
, (HROs) ,
( , ,
) -
, .
,
,

,

.

, HROT , -
, Sagan SD: The Limits of Safety. Princeton, NJ, Princeton
University 6-2 6-3.
HROT
(
; , ). I -
, - -
.
( ), ,
.
- ,
, NAT .
, ,
- , .
. NAT ( ?), (
- ?) ( ?).
. 6-2.
- ,
. , -
Dianne Vaughan - ,
Challenger: . A
I 110

(HRO)
6-3 (HRO)

HRO, ( -
(. 6-2)
) .
, HRO,
.60 - ,
,
, .
HROT. 2003 . APSF
(, , ,
(. APSF Newsletter, 2003, , , )
www.apsf.org). 6-3 .
HRO, . ( ).

(,
).

, , () , .
,
, . , () .
( ) - , ,
- ,
, ,
- (), ;
. , - , (
),

6-2 ( HROT
.
6-3)
,
(checklists) .
, ,
. .

.

,
() .
,

.
, ,

. .

( ) , - -
, . (. . 7).

;
. ,
.

;


,
.
.
,

() .

. e , (e
,
; ; ),
, (
. , ).

, , , ,
. . e
.
.
Weick .. Organizational culture as a source of
A high reliability. Calif Manage Rev 29:112-127, 1987
111 6
, .
,
. - .
, - - Cooke Salas61,62
( 6-4). ,
. , - ,
, , , -
, -
, . (, ).
,
, , - -
, . . ,
, -
, -
, - , ,
/ . . 6-4 -

I
-
. , .61

.
. -
, .
-
. , , .
, ,
(.. , ,
, , , ), ( -
),
, ( .
, , ) - , ,
- .
. , -
, , .
( Conference on , (,
Human Error in Anesthesia, Asilomar, CA, 1991). , , ) -

, , .
, . , -
- ( ,
-
. , ). ,

. -
6-4 ,
(
. , , -
, cognitive scaf-folding).
.
, . ,
. , -
: (teaching in
,
progress) (inadequate
, .
supervision).63
. ,
, ( , . cue)
; ( ), (
, . ), .64
e . , ,
. ,
,
,

.
.
,
Salas E, Rosen MA, King H: Managing teams managing ,
crises: Principles of teamwork to improve patient safety in the emer- , ,
gency room and beyond. Theoret Issues Ergonomics Sci 8:381-394,
2007 . A
I 112

20% -

-
, 5%
. -
- , -
. - .
, -
, , - ; 38%
.57 - -
, 48%
, . -
.
, .
. , - -
, , -
, , - ,
, - -
. .
- .
.
,
, -

.
, , -
( (probabilistic risk analy-
) - sis, PRA),
, - .66,67 PRA -

. (,
, ).
. PRA . -
Gaba .65 - PRA--

, . . PRA- -
, 49% - ,
,
. -
( - ,
) , -
() . - -
, 20% : .
, - PRA- -
. ,
,
, -
. . PRA- -



, ,
,
,

A . 6-4
113 6
, . ,
, .
- , -
. .
--
(process-oriented systems analysis) - -
. , (. . 6-1). -
() , ,
(1-3 . 6-1B),
- - , -
.68 (4,
, 5). IRSs
, - ,
,
. ,
.

I
1-3 4, 5 . 6-1, , -
, -
,
.
-
,
.80
IRSs, -
,
(. 6-5).

( HROT) - , -,
. - , , .
( IRSs (learning
), - systems),
( , ). -
- -
(National Reporting
, - and Learning System of the National Patient Safety Agency in
, the National Health Service).
, - IRSs
.25,46,47,69-72 - ,
(successful . IRSs
incident reporting systems, IRSs) .94
.5,7,42,52,73-90 -

90-92, .
, , -
, - (. 6-6;
, . . 6-5)
. , , . -
, 6-5,
, - 88.
,
, . ?
, ,
.92,93 , IRS.105

- ( ),
, 1,2
, , . ,
5,25,42,60,72,73,75,76,94-103. , ,
,
. ,
- - ;

. . ,
- ,
( ) , , ,
, - , A
I 114



. 6-5 , . , e
, , , -
e e, . ,
. e. (. P. Dieckmann)

. , - , -
.
- , , , -
, , .
.
, ?
,

,


-
, .
, -
(Aviation Safety Reporting System, ASRS),
,
(Charles Billings, ASRS). -
/
. -
,
-

.
-
, .



, .77


,
, :
,
,


, . -

, -
. 6-6 ,
,
. (e)
. .
e . , e -

, e . , , -
A


115 6
, -
, , . -
(Richard Cook, ). ,

, .
, -
, - PSOs,
. -, , 50 96% , , .
106,107
, , - , -
-
.
6-5
e
, -

, -

I

.
. -, -
-
. e .
,
- ( ).
. , - .

: e
- (never events),
,
.

IRSs
( e , , NASA ASRS)
.
, , ,
:
e, ,
. - e .
, e e.
, ,
. e (,
, -
).
,
e,
, , -
,
, -
.
. ,
ASRS e,
- ( ,
, ,
, . , ASRS ).

, .

. - .
,
.
, -
,
(, -
,
)
e
.
.
e
, - , .

(
). 2005 . ( !)
ASRS, ;
(Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act, Public Law 109-
NASA,
41).

-
(patient safety organizations, PSOs) 25, 77, 80, 104 A
I 116

,
.
. , -
20 -
, -
,
. .
, . -
. , - , ,
,
IRS , PaSOS, .109,111-113 -
- (
); .2
, 20,114
- ,
. (, -
, ).71,115-117 -
, (crisis resource management, CRM)
.118 Helmreich ,
-
.
, , -
.47
. , -
, CRM-.
,
. : (1)
, , ,
, , (. 6-3), (2) -
, ,
, , .
, - 5 ,
. . 6-7.
IRSs
(. . 1).5,7,42,52,73-90
,
,
, .108 ?
6-6 , ( )
1980- .
PaSOS ( www.pasos-ains.de) -
, (M.R.). (, ,
-
)24,25,41,119-122


.123 -
Gaba, Howard
. - . (
, )4,105,109,113,124,
, (anesthesia crisis
, resource management, ACRM). ACRM
, -
, .
- .
. , 70% CRM -
, - , -
,
, - .
. -
70% ! , ,
.
, - , -
. - , ,
, - (
A . ).
117 6

6-6 e
PaSOS

, .

. IRS, .


. , . ,
, , e. (
( ). e, ,
Web ,
(SSL). ).
, e
php-. ;

I
e, , U.K. NHS NPSA ,52,94,95

CRM (. ).60,109
(TuPASS), , ,
. , .
e
;
, e e,
, IRS ,

() . .

e . (
, e). ,
PaSOS
, ,
. IRS.
, e
Web. (
, ).
(, e, ,
.). , ,
e . ,
e , ,
e . .

IRS e
60, 104, 108, 110

, - . -
CRM (
. CRM - ) , , -
,
. .
CRM, - -
, -
(. 6-7). .
-
. (1- CRM)
, , , CRM .
CRM
, . - .
, , , (
ACRM Gaba, Fish Howard125, , )
, . , -
.25,41,43,46,47,70,71,72,126-130 , ,

, CRM . ,
- , A
I 118

. 6-3 : ,





(Fletcher .146) (Gaba .130) (Gaba .147,148)


e

(
)

-













/





e
e e

- !
( ,
) , ,

(
)

.


-
.


(2- CRM)

. -

. ,
, -

. ,
, -
, .
, -
, , -
.*
* being behind the eight ball
. 6-7 . - , -
,
A , -
(. . .)
119 6

6-7 CRM
, .
-
1. . . , ,
; - -
2. .

3. . .
4. , , , .
.
5. ( 10 10 : 10 10
). (5- CRM)

6. .
. - -
7. ! ,
8. . . ,
9. -
. , -

I
.
10. e (
, .
!).
, ,
11. - .
. , 10 10
12. ( 10 , ,
10 ). ,
13. -
. , .
-
14. .
, -
15. . ,
Rall M, Gaba DM: Human performance and patient (. 6-8).
safety. In Miller RD (ed): Millers Anesthesia, 6th ed. Philadelphia,
Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2005
(6-
CRM)
(3- CRM) , ,
, ,
.
. , , (
, ) -
, , , -
- . .
, ,
, . .
, -
: (1)
, (2) 10 10
(,
, ), (3)
, !
?
( ),
!
(4) , .
, , ,
, .

10
(4- CRM) ! ?
. - - ?
, , - ?
. ?
?
, - , !
. -
, . 6-8 10 10 . -
, , 10-
. (
, (
) . ) ().
, (). ().
, , , - , -
. - . e -
. ,
.

A
I 120

, - .
. .131,132

!
(7- CRM) .
. ,
, ( )
, ; .
, ,
(. . 6-7). -
. .
; , - ,
, ,
(. 6-9). , -
-
. ,
(8- CRM)
, , .
-
.
-,
. , .
(, , ), - ,
, , . -
, (. , -
) . ( )
, -
, .
(9- CRM) 10 10
- (5- CRM)
. .
, , -
, . .
,
, :
, . ! (10- CRM).
( ) -
, - . ,
. (,
) , -
( ).

,
.
, -
. ,
,

. -
,

.
, , -
.


-


(11- CRM)

()
, , ,
-
. 6-9 , - .
. , -
, , .
. -
, e ( ). e,
, , . ,
; - .
. - -
e. .
A .
, e
,
121 6
- ,
, , . ,
. - ,
.
, - -
. .

:
10 10 (12-
CRM).
. ,
CRM
. -
,
- , CRM .
. - --
, CRM

I
. (, , -
, MedTeams, Medical Team Training, LifeW-
ings),133-140 ,
. 6-8 - CRM,
, .
,
. -. ,
CRM -

(13- CRM) . CRM ,
,
- -
. .
, ,
Eduardo Salas . CRM -
(. . 6-4). , , -
. , *,
, ,
, , . , . . 7,
CRM-
,
.
, - .
(. 10 10 ,
5- CRM). (, , -
) - , (, / -
, . ) ,
, -
(14- , .
CRM)
, * (. . . .)
. , ,
.
. -
: airway, breathing, circulation
( , , - 6-8
). -

()
,
?
,
, -? (,
. ?)
?
-
(15- CRM) ?

,
,
?
, -
-
. , ? A
I 122

, ,
CRM ,
. -
,
70%
, , -
. .
CRM- -
. 6-3 -
- Fletchers (anesthesia
, - nontechnical skills, ANTS) -
. , CRM- ACRM (. 6-7).
,
, ANTS
. CRM- Fletcher -
, ( Rhona Flin), -
,
. (Glavin Maran),
, - . Fletcher
, , -
, CRM- ,
. , -
. -

, -
, .144
, ,
, , -
-
Morgan CleaveHogg , ,
.145

.141 Glavin Maran, ,
, - , ,
, , , 146.
142; , - ,

. , .

,
, - , .
(NASA/University of Texas Aerospace Crew Performance ACRM109,147,148,
Project). Fletcher .
VAStanford - :

, -
.130,143 , -
(
), , -
, ,

, 14 ,
- (Fletcher) ANTS . 6-4,
( - Gaba
). ACRM.
- ANTS,
, , ,
. 6-4.
ANTS
. , ,
,
. - NOTECHS,
UTMarkers
, - (Helmreich).
. -
A ,
123 6
. 6-4 ( ANTS V1,0)

,
. : , ,
, .

, ,
, ; , .

: :


/

, , , .. (,
, e, ); ;

: :

e

;
, ,

: :

e
,


()

Fletcher GCL, Flin R, Glavin RJ, Maran NJ: Framework for Observing and Rating Anaesthetists NonTechnical SkillsAnaesthetists NonTechnical Skills (ANTS)
System V1.0, 22nd version. Aberdeen, Scotland, University of Aberdeen, 2003


, .
( , ,
http://www2.hu-berlin.de/gihre/Download/Publications/ ,
GIHRE2.pdf). .115,149
ANTS. ANTS
ANTS , ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
, , . , ,
. ANTS
, ( , , ).

. 6-5 , e Fletcher .

/
/

0,55-0,67 /

/
0,56-0,65


% + 1 88-97%

0,49-0,84, /

Fletcher R, Flin P, McGeorge R, et al: Anaesthetists non-technical skills (ANTS): Evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 90:580-588, 2003
A
I 124

Flin ,
.
, - , -
.25,72,123,128-130,150-152 , ,
,
. .
, , , -
- , -
. - ,
. ,
. - , ,
, , -
-
, .
, , -
. , -
-
, . -
. ,
Fletcher . ANTS .
, . -
- ,
4- 40 000 60 000
4 21 . 60 000 .
,
(. . 6-3) , ,
( ,
). - .
- SA -
, ,
. ANTS - . , ,
, , -
. , , -
, , , -
.
ANTS. - , .
, -
. 6-5.
, .
, ,
. , ,
, - .
, , , - , , , -
, , , -
. . ,
(4 21 ), , , , -
. -
, -
, , , -
. 1 .
4- .
ANTS- .
- HROs
, .
,
(NOTECHS)

.

, .153-156
, -
( -

, ),
A , - .
125 6
, ,
- ,
; , , , .
(. ).
,
.153 ,
Murthy .157,158 , -
- ,
( )
-- ,
. .163 , ,
- ,
- ,
.157 ,
- . ,
, , , ,

I
-
. , -
- , .
. -
, , -
- , , ,
, (, )
. ( ).
Allen Blascovich159 , ,
, Matt Weinger -
- .164,165 ,
(.. ,
), - .
, ,
. Weinger, ,
.160 -
Allen Blascovich -
, .
, ACRM ,
, , -
.160,161 ,
. ( ),
, ,
, Allen Blascovich162 : . , -
, -
, , - (
, , , ), ,
. , - -
, - , -

, .
,
.
Murthy .
(80 85 ) -
. Steven K. Howard,
M.D., (Veterans Administration
Palo Alto Health Care System), (Stanford University
, School of Medicine, Stanford, California).
.
:
, - -
, . -
, , 166
. :

. , - [] - -
. - 24-
( )
. ( - A
I 126

, ,
,
). - , -
, .
, 7 8 ,
, . 15% -
, , - . ,

- ,
. .

,
, , - ,
- . -
.
(, , , . ,
) ,
- , , .
.
, -
-
(NTSB), .170
, , , - , -
, - .
.
. , - .
, -
ExxonValdez, 60 90 (http://www.
, sleepfoundation.org/site/c.huIXKjM0IxF/b.3933533/).
, - ,
Challenger. -
, -
, , , . ,
. , , -
, , ,
, , - .
-
. ()
, I, 1999 ., , 24-
, , .
. , ,
, .
. ,
, , - , -.
, - 24- -
. , -
(. Zeitgebers),
, ( -).
,
,
.167,168 2
6 , 2 6 .
.
Carskadon .169 , ,
,
, , . -
, , - -
, , ,
. - , -
, ,
- .171
,
. -
, . , -
. -
A , .
127 6
. , -
. - , -
( .
), - ,
,
, . . -
- ,
, - -
( , ,
, .
, ,
). , -
, - .
-
, . ,
. - , -

I

, .172 , ( ) -
. -
30-
, , - ,
, , .
(
), -
, - -
.
. (, ).
, , , ,
.170 - .
, . -
.4 ,
. - ,
, . ,
. - . -
, ,
. . -
, 173 - -
- .
, ,
. , -
, - . ,
, ,
(, . -
, .
). .
, (,
), , - ,
, , . , -
(. , -
). 60 /, .
()
, -
, , ,
- .176
174,175 NASA (Ames
Research Center) -
, , , -
. .177
- , ,
, . - , . -
, , ,
. , , ,
. -
, -
, ASA, : ( , non-nap)
. (nap). - A
I 128

, -
, , -
, , , -
. . ,
, , (1) -
, , - . -
*, (2) ,
non-nap . ,
,
, (3) , .
() -
non-nap. , - -
. Carskadon, Dement .182,183
, (Multiple Sleep Latency
. , - Test, MSLT),
, -
. MSLT
. - -
. . -
? (.. ) -
. , ,
. -
, MSLT 10- -
. - ,
.178 5
. ,
,
- ,
24 .
.179-181 -
,
- -
. MSLT Howard .168,184 -
, -
( : (1) ( ,
, 48 ), (2)
). ( 24- -
) (3) .
, - -
, 10 ( 3-4
. - ) 4 -
, - . . -
. ,
, -
, .
. -
MSLT 6,75,3 4,94,7
,
,
.
7,1 1,5 ,
, -
, - 6,31,9 .
. ,
, , - ,
. .
. 9 , MSLT
- (12,0 6,4 ).
, , , ,
. ,
, , .
; ,

. ,
.
A * (. .) .
129 6
(, ) -
, , (
, , ),
, , , -
. , .
(, 2 ,
) -
Howard . ,
( ),
( ) - .187
( ). - -
.167
(
, Stanford Sleepiness Scale); -
MSLT,
. -

I
MSLT - 2003 . -
,
MSLT. , - -
- .
, www.acgme.org, :
.
, - (80) , -
, 4- (
MSLT. , ).
51% - ( 24- ) 7
,
, , - ( , ),
. - 4 .
, , 1
3 , 4- .
. 24 ;
, 6 -
, -
, ,
. , -
.
24-
.
10-

.
(moonlighting)
3 , - 80- .
, 70% - : ,
.185
, , ,
.186 , 10% 80- .

-
. ,
24-
; . , , , -
- -
, , .
. ,

,
, -
, - .188,189 ,

. , -
, , - ,190 -
, , .191
, (-
. , ) Landrigan A
I 130

.192 , . -
.198,199
80% :
. -
, - 1.
.
. , -
,
.
, -
10%, , - ,
.
.

/ .
, 2.
. 2009 . , , . -
-
,
(NHS) , 58 48, - , ,
. ; -

- ,
. -
NHS , -
NHS National Workforce .
Projects (http://www.healthcareworkforce.nhs.uk/). - 3.
- (3 5 ). -
, ,
-
, .
. 4. -
, , , . -
,
.193,194 ,

-
, .
Brigham and Womens Hospital
.195,196 ,
,
, , -
( . ,
) ,
( 17 ), , - ,
. , -
, 35,9% .
-
. , ,
(85 65)
(5,8 ). ?
,
.
- Gaba .200 , 50% -
,
- , . -
.197 , - (61%)
- ,
,
. .201 202 ,
-

.
Howard .178 -

A - -.
131 6
4- -
(, -
,
, ). -
, -
4 , (. . 8).
( 10 ),
- , .
25 ( -). , ,
, 2 ,
, . , -
- .203,204 -
,
- - . -
.
,

I
, - . -
, , -
. -
, , .
. -
(,
. ).
,
;
- (, :
, ). ; -
( ) -
, ; ,
25% ; ,
(60 ). , -
, . -
,
, -

, , , .
-
. - ,
,
, .
, - -
. -- .
,
. , - , ,
, , , . -
. . (.. , -
, )
, - -
. - .

,
. ,
. , -
- . -
, ,
. ,
- , , ,
, -
, : . -
, ,
.
, -
.

,
A
I 132

, -
. , (
. ),
.
, . (-
, - ) .
. , , ,
, - , , ,
, .
.
-
, - .
. 45
, -
(, ,
). 25 , -
, .
, ,
, . 45 ; ,
, , -
( . 10 -
) . - .
, , 90 120
, , -
. .
. - (NASA) -
,
. , .177
- SmithCoggins .
-
. - .204
, . ,
(
), 3 -
- 40 . ,
-
, . ( ) .
- ,
- (1) -
(2) -
. , - .
-
, , , . (Strategic Nap
- Program), -
- .
, . ,
, , -
, - , , .
. , , -
,
.
- .
, - ,
. Cooper .205,206 .
-
. -
, .
. - .
, , -
.
. -
- 10 1 , , -
. .
,
, , ,
A , . .
133 6

-
.190,207 ,
, , , - . ,
, - (> 7000 12 000 )
() ,
15 30 - 12- -
. - 2-3 .210
-
(2 6 ). .
, ,
40 ,
. .
, - .
, ,
(, ,

I
). , ,
, . -
( 15 ), -
, .
. ,
- ,
. , -
, .
, -
-
- - , .211
. , -
(,
). (, ),
, , - -

. , , .212 -,
,
- , . -, -
. , -
. ,
- -
. , , -
, , .
-
.208 ,
, , .
, -
, - , .
.
, ,
; () -
.209 - , -
.212
. -
( ) ,213
, , , -
. ,
, .
, . - -
: (1) - ,
( 15 30 ) .
(3 4 ) (2) -
, . .
?
. 1959 2007 . -
status quo.167
, ( 60
), . 60
, . , , - A
I 134

,
,
. - .
, -

, - -
. , -
, - (. . 101).
30 ,54,214 - ,
, -
60 65 , . -
60 , 2007 . 60 - ,
(HR 4343). - ,
.
65 , -
60 . , -
. ,
(FAA) , , .
1 6
. (. . 101).55,56,215-218
- 8% -
- . -
(, ). 75%
, - .
, , 1,6 (drinks)*
, - 2,7 . 10% -
. , -
- , 40% ,
, 12- , 84%
, ,
. - .
, , - ,
,
. , . , -
, ,54,219-221 ,
- -
, - ,
, . 8 , .
, ,
, - , ,
, - .
. , 54,219-221 -
, - , , -
, .
, - 31 ,
, , 20.
.
, ,
. , -
FAA , -
( 6 ) .
FAA- . ,
, ,
.222,223
. , -
-
- ,
, , -
, . .
(American Board of Anesthesiology) ,
,
, 2000 .,
, -
, - * 1 drink ,

, . ,
1 , 18
A , , - 45 40 (. . . .)
135 6
- . .
. , ,
- ,
. - .
216,224,
, - . , -
, ,
,
.216 , , - .
,
. . ,
,
, .
,
. , -
-

I
, -
, , , .
- - , -
. ( .
) ,
,
- .
, .
, ,
,
, ?
.

-

, -
, -
, ?
, :
-
. 1.
, . ,
. , -
, - -
, - .

- . -
. - -
, .
, .
, -
, , -

, - .
,
. ,
, .
, 2.
, (.
- . 9). , ,
. - . -
- ,
.
.
, -
. -
. . ?
. , ,
, -
, , , ? A
I 136

,
, - Rasmussen Reason.237,239,240
.
3. . (
) (
, ,
). -
. - 241-245 -
, 268 246-249

. . . 6-6 -
, .
. , -
4. ,
(. . 99). ;
, , -
.
, - () -
. ,
- .
, - -
.
. ,
,
- -
, .
-
-
(. 1,2,225),
.3,48 Rasmussen237
-
, -
.
,
,
,
-
- . -
,
. - ,
44,58,113,144,226-232 - -
.113,144,226,233-235 , .
, , - ,
. .

,
.
6-9
126,235-238, -
, 1.
. 2.
3.
4.

5.

a
(,
)
, . 6-10, - b
, -
c ,
(. 6-9)
, , 6.
.
7. ( )

A . 8. 1 ( )
137 6










?
-
? ? ?
? ?
?


?
?
- ()


,

? , ,
(-) ?

= x .

()

. 6-10 (. ).
. (): , , . -
, , (
). ,
. , , , ,
. ( Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Howard SK: Crisis Management in Anesthesiology. New York, Churchill
Livingstone, 1994)

. 6-6


,
;
ACRM (. . 7)

: ,
(, ),
(, )

, ;
,

,
() , , ;

; ,
e,


; ,
, ; (,
;
slips laps ( )

ACRM, Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management


A
I 138

. 6-7


6-9.
. (,

)


.
, ..
, ,

, -
-
, ( ,
, - , )
- ()
.

, (, -
, ,
. )
, (,
, e ).
-
. .

-
(, 2 ()
. ,
, - , ,
).
. -
- (. ).
(UCSD/VAStanford ,
group), -
, , e

e ,
, ,

.



. (, ) -
, . ,
, , .
,
.
-
, . ,
, , ,
, , -
. . ,
, .
, . 6-7. (
, , ) -
, , -
( .144,250-252
). , ,
. ,
, , .
, -
(). , ,
, , ,
A .
139 6
Westenskow .253 -
-
. ,
.
, , -
, - ,
. 11 .
,
, .
,
?
. -
, , - ,
(approximation strategies) .39
; . ,
.254 , -

I
- .
, , , -
- ,
. 233,256 -
( 239), , -
. .
-

, .
-
. ,
, ()
- ,
. , -
-
. , .239

. ,236,257 , -
, .
-
. , ,
.
, - , . -
, -
, ,
, ,
. -
.268
-
- . -
.144,250 - ,
, , . -
, , -
, . -
- FI2, -
. , -
, . Cook (screen-only)258
.255 , 109,143,259,260, -
, , -
, -
. .
-
, -
, - .109,226,261-263
.
, - ,
, -
, . -
, .43 - ,
, . A
I 140

, -
,
-
. . -
239 , -
21% .
. - ,
, , - -
,
.258 - , .
, - , ,
- .27,29,31-35,37,38,227,265
; ,
,
. , -
,
, .113,226,256 ,
. ,
( )
,
, - , 6-7 12-
; - CRM .
. -

, .250-252,266,267
. -
.144,268,269
. , ,
. .144

. ( -
. .) ,
,
, -
-
, . ,
, , -
(slips), - , .
,
(mistakes).238 .
, ,

. , ( ) -
185,264 , .
, -
, - .
.
,
(mode error),238 , -
, - . -
.227 - ,
, - .
, . -
.
/ , ,
. - ,
, - .
, . ,
, .
, ,
-
. .279-281 -
, ,278 -
- ,
57 - . -
A . , , ,
141 6
, , . , -
(
). ,
.
, ,
. -
-
. , - .
,
. Schneider Detweiler163
Gopher ( -
, 1991) , , , ,
. .
- , -
.226,228 - ,
, . .

I
:

, 1.
( (,
), -
. ,
, , ).
, 2.
, - (
, ; , -
. ,
).
3. -

, (- .
), 4.
(). , ; ,
, -
, , ,
, . - , .
5. -
. - (
, - -
. , -
, - ,
(- ).
, ). 6. -
,
,
. ,
.
7.
, .
, ,
.
, (
. , ) 282

, - .
. 228
, , ,
. .
, , -
. , -

.
. -
.
; - -
, A
I 142

, , -
, , .276
.
, - .
; . (
CRM. , ,
, , - ), -
, .
- , ,
, , , -
. , , , .
. -
, ,
.
,
, , ,
(, -
, ). , -
, (fixation error).131,132
- , -
. , -
, .259,260,277
- 9-
CRM
.24,115-117,283-285 CRM.
-
,

-
.186
, , - ,
CRM. , , -
. , -
,

- - .195
. , ,
, . 6-8. -
, ,
, .
.260 -
, , .
,
- . 6-8
( CRM- -
).
, : .
. , . .
-
!
: - . .
, .270 , e
- !
. -
: .

. e
.
.271-275 , - .
, -
(, ), : , .
. .
-

. Chisholm .
.

. : .
, 3- - ? .
30 ( . . -e,
A ) 20 . - .
143 6
- , -
, , ,
, --
. ,
- . 30-40% ,
, -
. , , 20-40% ,
, , , .
,
. Roizen
1984 . Cooper278 -
:
. ,
, - -
. - , -
, .

I
. -
, , .
, - -
, .


, .
- -
-
. ,
, , -
.
. -
. , -
,
, -
,
, , - ,
( - . -
Human Factors286). ,
, . -
, ,
. , - ,
, .
. -
. - .
, ,
. - , Gibby .288
: (1) - , 20% , -
, (2) ASA
. 1 2, -
, -
. ,

, -

.
,
-
- .
(. . 34). - - -
,
.
- ,
. . -
Roizen .287 :

, -
, . A
I 144



-
. -

. - . ,
,
, -
, - 105 (. 6-11 6-10
). -
(. . 38). .296,297
. Buffington .289 , ,
3% , - -
, - .
;
. 30%
,
,
( - .

).
- . -
(FDA) ASA, - (1) (2)
(APSF) .
- . 6-12.
.290 , -
ASA , -
APSF. , . ,
, ,
- - , -
. 291 - () .
,
().
FDA .
50% () - ,
.
,
, FDA -
-
;
65%. , 34% ,
,
,
-
. , ,
,

-
.
-
, -
.292
FDA 1994 .293
, ,
,
( 50%)
.294 ,

( Blike Biddle),
,
.295 -
, ,

, , ,
, - . 6-11 -
A . 178
(VA NCPS). -
- 6-10
145 6

6-10 ()


FIO2 100%
( e,
)
- e
e

/

;
( PIP)

e e ( )
, e

I

, , , e e
(e )
10-50
: ;
, , /
, -
-e
(500-1000 );

(, , , )

: 4-8

, ,

,

-
- ,
, . , -
- , a priori .
(. . 6-12), -
, - , , -
. ,
. , , Cooper .299 ,
18% -
, , , , 3%
. - . ,
. , , -

,
, .
Moller .300 4 439
10 312 -
(2 441), (1 998).
(. 6-12) , - , ,
, . -
. - ,
? .
(the Multicenter Study of General Anesthesia)298 86%
.

, 5% -
, -

. , , , ,
, , - A
I 146

. .


1 2 3




:
:

:

1:


?

?

1: 2:

. 6-12 . ,
( ). , (), -
(). , , .
.
( ). , e ,
( ). ( Gaba DM: Human Error in Dynamic Medical Environments. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence
Erlbaum, 1994, pp 197-224)

Reason Perrow, - .
(. 6-13).58,113,226 4. ,
, .
.59,301 , 5. ,
, . .
, - 6. . ,
() ,
- ().
: , , -
. ,
,
(, ), - ( -
- ). , -
. , ,
,
. - , -
: , .
,
1. - , , -
. .
2. , -
. (defense-in-depth) J.
3. - Reason70
, - Perrow (. . 6-2 6-3 NAT .
A ; 6-2).
147 6

, ,
,
. -
20 -
. , 31,35-38,40,178,198,235,302-305
- . , -
, ,
. 30 000 .2,19,184,306-319
,
, . -
( ) .
1982 2001 . - ,
0,38 100 000 . Drui . 1973 ., 320 ,
0,045 100 000 .
2002 . - . 241-243

I
( NTSB: , 40-50% -
www.ntsb.gov/aviation/Stats.htm).
. McDonald Dzwonczyk242
, 1981 ., -
, , ,
, 100 , .
. ,
, 3-5%- - , ,
.
, , - . -
, - , / -
.

. 6-13 . Reason,
, , , .
, -
. , . -
, .
, ,
.
. ( Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Howard SK: Crisis Management in Anesthesiology. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1994)
A
I 148

- , -
. 83% .
,
. ,198,235,244,245,304,321
243 1985 . UCSD/VAStanford. -

, ( 11 28-32)
1981 . (44,8% 16,8%). - -
, (4-5 ) -
1981 ., - . ,
, 1985 .
, .
. ( , , -
, - [], )
50,1% . , -
. - -
, - ,
. (, , ),
- . 6-14. , -
, , , .
, , -
- , (-
. , McDon- ) .
ald Dzwonczyk,243 a priori : ,
, - (-
. ) ,
, - ;
: , , ,
, . ,
? -
, -
, .322
( ),
? ( 1-2- )
, Drui .320 -
, - (11% ), -
-.
, , , -
? , . ,
, . -
,
,
.
Boquet .241
(
), -

.
.
, 25%
,
. ,
.
Drui .320
, 40%
, , ,
.
1988 . McDonald Dzwonczyk242 ,
,
, -
,
. 6-14 -
. Drui .320 .
,
, ( 28 ). e , -
; - , ,
A ,
, ,

149 6

FIT System


()


()





SmileDesign 1999

I
. 6-15 .


, ,
, - ,
, , -
- -
, . Drui .320
6 .322 -
, . Kennedy
, .324 .
, . 20 -
-
(. . 6-9 ,
).


- ,
(Flexible ,
Interface Technique, FIT)323, - ,
, - ,
, ,
,
,
,
- ,
246 (. 6-15). , , /
41 - ,
(. 6-9). - ,
() , ,
, -
(1) -,
. , ,
. 6-16 6-17 24 , , ; (2)
. - -,
, ,
(); - , , ; (3)

5 (). . 6-16
- (,
. ,
. 6-17 - )
- , ,
. (,
- e),
- , (
, ), , ,
- ( -
(. . 7). ) A
I 150

300

250


200

150

100

. 6-16
, 50

e
. 0

1 11 21 31 41 51 16 71 81 91 101 111
, -
()
. -
( 1 ) ( 1 )

, , . , ( 5 ) ( 5 )
,







,

1 11 21 31 41 51 16 71 81 91
()

1
( 1 )

. Loeb325 .
(UCD) , , , UCSD/VAStanford
1-2 10-20 , , ,
, 20% -
. Gurushanthaiah , .322 -
.326
, , -
.
, , -
-
.
, .
. UCD and UCSD/VAStanford ,
, ,
, * .328,329
-


.
, ,
.227
,
. - . Drui .320,
McDonald Dzwonczyk,242 ,
. Allard .327 .
- ?
- ,
* , .
; , -
,
(. . .
A .) .
151 6
2 3
300 300

250 250


200 200

150 150

100 100

( 1 ) ( 1 )
50 50


( 5 ) ( 5 )
0 0
1 11 21 31 41 51 16 71 81 91 101 111 1 11 21 31 41 51 16 71 81 91 101 111
() ()

I
. 6-17 () .
e ( 2) ( )
. 3, , e ;
,


45 .
() -
, 6
, - .
, ( ) .
, .
- ,
, -
. ,
, - .

(
), . .
,
, , - UCSD/VA-Stanford244,245 UCD325,329,331,
.
, ,
. ,

200

, ()
-
150
, . -
, P<0,02
, (-
100 P<0,001
) ,

. , , -
- 50
, ,
-
; , 0
( -
()
, ). -

, . 6-18 .
- - -
,
, (- , -
), - . -
. , .
Gaba Lee330 (, , .
) ,
,
e, -

A
I 152

, . , , ,
UCSD/VAStanford, ,
,
. ; , ,
(), ( )
. , ,
,
, . .
UCD , Slagle .303
- -
.
(, Vig [vigilance, 20
], 5 10).
, , .
, .
, Vig
. VAStanford 38 .
()
, ()
. ,
,
.
. ,
,
UCSD/VAStanford, 60 , ,
,
( ),
- (. 6-18). .
, ( ) Manser
. . .246,247,332
UCD 56% 60
, 16% (27%
) 5 . -
, , ,
,
. ()
. -
. -, . , -
,
( ; , -
Gaba Lee UCD ), , ,
.
. . -
, ,
, . Gaba Lee330
(.. ,
) NASA, ,
, .
(). Gaba UCSD/VAStanford
Lee330 37% (
) ,
. ,
UCSD/VAStanford
(, ), - . ,
; UCD
.
,
.244 , ,
. ,
, .

.
,
, .

A . ,
153 6
- -
. - -
, - ,
. Toung .333 - . ,
-
. Azar -
.334 , - .
UCSD/VAStanford ,
, , (
ST. Bitetti .335 - )
, ,
, ,
. ,
(. 6-19)328.
, .

I
(). ,
;
0,1 . ,
. ,
, .
, .
.
,

.

.
,
-
- ,
. ,
- .
, -
.247,336 ,
-
. .
(). ,

260
*
240 ,
()
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
/

. 6-19 e.
e (electronic
automated record keeping, EARK) , (manual record keeping, MAN). 50%
( 75 , 25 ),
. EARK MAN.
, ()
, .
, , , e .
*P< 0,05; P < 0,05. (Weinger MB, Herdon OW, Gaba DM: The effect of electronic record keeping and transesophageal echocardiography on task distribution, workload,
and vigilance during cardiac anesthesia. Anesthesiology 87:144-145, 1997)
A
I 154

, , , , ,
( (fluency), , ,
) , , , -
, , ,
. .

.

: , ,
.
1.
?
2. , .337
( -
?)
?
,
) ,

?
-
? -


?
)
, -
- . -
? , ASA.

- ? , -
. ,

. -
3. (J. Warm, ASA,
? 1992).
. -
(,
, -- , -
- . -
)? .
, -
, ,
. - .338,339 ,
- ,
, -
, - -
.
. ,
. , -
, -
- .58
-
. -
-
. , () .
, Beatty .340 -
- . ,
. Denisco .341
, - - , -
,
.
. .
-
- ,
. Greaves Grant21 16 . , -
A , , Denisco .341
155 6
,
.
,
, -
. , -
,
. ,
, - . ,
. -
,
, .
. 344-346,
178 , (-
).
( ,
) , - ,

I
. , , . 10 -
, ,
, 10 -
( , ), .39,236,250
. -
. , - ,
, , -
, -
. .
(), - (
. ), -
1 19 - , -
, -
,
. .
- -
- , .
.
342
(
). ,
, , , Gaba DeAnda11,259,347 -
. - , -
, -
,
( ):
; 1. -
, - 180.
, - 2. ()
, . .
343, 3. .
, 4. -
, 13% 1 () .
. 5.
, , .
, - 6. /.
,
. ( )
- (
).
, - ,
. - , -
/ .
.
, . 6-20.
,
, :
. -
1.
, . . (, - A
I 156


1500 1000
()

()
1250
800

1000
600

750
400
500

200
250

0 0
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

A B

500 200
()

()

400

300
100

200

100

0 0
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

C D
. 6-20 : , ; B,
; C, ; D, . : 1 1-2-
, 2 3-4- , 3 , 4 . e
, (. ). , .
.
. , , e
. (DeAnda, GABA DM: the Role of experience in response to simulated critical incidents. Anesth Analg 72:308-315, 1991.)

) - 2. -
.
(, ) , -
, -
. . ,
( ,
) - , ,
- . , -
(
, ), - ,
(7-8 ; 1,5-4,5 -
) , - . , -
-
. , .

(11 ; 9 -
A ). . -
157 6
. 6-10

- (%) - (%) - (%)

80 100 100

20 40 20

20 60 40

40 30 20

Schwid HA, ODonnell D: Anesthesiologists management of simulated critical incidents. Anesthesiology 76:495-501, 1992

. - 10
3. .
, -
. - :

I

( ). 1.
() - .
, . ,
4. , -
. - . , 60% -
, -
, ,
, - , ,
, -
, . -
. - (. 6-11).
- 2. -
, -
. .
3. , -
Schwid ODonnell258 ,
(Anes- .
thesia Simulator Consultant, ASC, Anesoft Corp., ,
. 6-10) , Westenskow .253
Gaba DeAnda.
-
, , -
, , ,
. .

.
-
( , , -
, ). -
. -
,
, . , -
. 15
10 -, 90 -
, 10 . 10 ,

. 6-11

- (%) - (%) - (%)

30 50 70

40 60 20

20 10 0

50 20 10

70 40 40

Schwid HA, ODonnell D: Anesthesiologists management of simulated critical incidents. Anesthesiology 76:495-501, 1992
A
I 158

- ,
, , -
2 11 5 , 3 .
, 3 Botney .352 -
. - 18 -
, .
(, 4%,
- -
). .
, -
( , - 2.
, ). -
, ,
, .
, - , -
, - ,

-. , ,
. -
(25 , -
21 ), , 4 , 12 .
. -
, -
. 100% FIO2
, - .
(..
,
, ).
- (19 ), -
. , - .
18
, ( ),
-
, - -
. . 18
Loeb Fitch348 - ,
. - , (
).
,349-351 ,
;
. - .
,
(-) - -
, - -
.
(80% 88%). Byrne Jones310
,
. -
, ,
180 .
.
.
,319
,
- -
, , Howard . -
.109
, , - , .
. . 7
,
, . 17,20,142,148,312,319,353-357
-
. Howard . -
,
- Cook .255
A , -
159 6
. - 5. .
, ,
- .
. , , -
-
. -
(,
, , ).
,
.
57 , 21
. 226


: , - .
, ,

I
, . .247,328 Devitt .
()
.19
, -
, .
. Mackenzie .358-362
- ,
- ,
.
Cook .255 .
,
: -
1. . , ,
, , .363

(, ). ,
.
. .

. ,
.150,178,270,303,332,364-370
( , -
). ,
2. . -

, . -
.
3. . -
.*
. , , , - ,

. .
4. . -
, * . 20, 79, 81, 142, 143, 198, 235, 244-246, 303,
. 314 357

A
I 160

1. Cooper JB, Gaba D: No myth: Anesthesia is a 38:636-645, 1996. Health Care 10(Suppl 2):ii21-ii25, 2001.
model for addressing patient safety. Anesthesiol- 24. Salas E, Fowlkes JE, Stout RJ, et al: Does CRM 44. Cook RI, Woods DD, McDonald JS: On attribut-
ogy 97:1335-1337, 2002. training improve teamwork skills in the cockpit? ing critical incidents to factors in the environ-
2. Gaba DM: Anaesthesiology as a model for patient Two evaluation studies. Hum Factors 41:326-343, ment [letter]. Anesthesiology 71:808, 1989.
safety in health care. BMJ 320:785-788, 2000. 1999. 45. Columbia Accident Investigation B: Columbia
3. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS: To Err 25. Flin R, OConnor P, Crichton M: Safety at the Accident Investigation Board Report, vol 1. Avail-
is HumanBuilding a Safer Health System. Sharp EndA Guide to Non-technical Skills. able at http://www.nasa.gov/columbia/home/
Washington, National Academy Press, 1999. Aldershot, Ashgate, U.K., 2007. CAIB_Vol1.html/ Accessed 2003.
4. Lagasse RS: Anesthesia safety: Model or myth? A 26. St. Pierre M, Hofinger G, Buerschaper C: Crisis 46. Reason J: Human Error. Cambridge, UK, Cam-
review of the published literature and analysis of Management in Acute Care Setting: Human bridge University Press, 1994.
current original data. Anesthesiology 97:1609- Factors and Team Work in a High Stakes Environ- 47. Helmreich RL: On error management: Lessons
1617, 2002. ment. Berlin, SpringerVerlag, 2008. from aviation. BMJ 320:781-785, 2000.
5. Beckmann U, Baldwin I, Hart GK, Runciman 27. Weinger MB, Smith NT, Ehrenwerth J, Eisenkraft 48. Committee on Quality of Health Care in Anes-
WB: The Australian Incident Monitoring Study in JB: Vigilance, Alarms, and Integrated Monitoring thesiology, Institute of Medicine: Crossing the
Intensive Care: AIMSICU. An analysis of the Systems. St Louis, MosbyYear Book, 1993. Quality ChasmA New Health System for the
first year of reporting. Anaesth Intensive Care 28. Loeb R, Weinger MB, Englund CE, et al: Ergo- 21st Century. Washington, DC, National
24:320-329, 1996. nomics of the Anesthesia Workspace. Malvern, Academy Press, 2001.
6. Bracco D, Favre JB, Bissonnette B, et al: Human PA, MosbyYear Book, 1993. 49. Berwick DM, Leape LL: Reducing errors in medi-
errors in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit: 29. Weinger MB, Englund CE: Ergonomic and cineits time to take this more seriously. BMJ
A 1-year prospective study. Intensive Care Med human factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and 319:136-137, 1999.
27:137-145, 2001. monitoring performance in the operating room 50. Gaba DM: Anesthesiology as a model for patient
7. Buckley TA, Short TG, Rowbottom YM, Oh TE: environment. Anesthesiology 73:995-1021, 1990. safety in health care. BMJ 320:785-788, 2000.
Critical incident reporting in the intensive care 30. Gosbee J: Human factors engineering and patient 51. Leape LL, Berwick DM: Safe health care: Are we
unit. Anaesthesia 52:403-409, 1997. safety. Qual Saf Health Care 11:352-354, 2002. up to it? [editorial]. BMJ 320:725-726, 2000.
8. Cullen DJ, Sweitzer BJ, Bates DW, et al: Prevent- 31. Fraind DB, Slagle JM, Tubbesing VA, et al: Reen- 52. Vincent C, TaylorAdams S, Chapman EJ, et al:
able adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: gineering intravenous drug and fluid administra- How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents:
A comparative study of intensive care and general tion processes in the operating room: Step one: Clinical risk unit and association of litigation and
care units. Crit Care Med 25:1289-1297, 1997. Task analysis of existing processes. Anesthesiol- risk management protocol. BMJ 320:777-781,
9. Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, et al: A look into ogy 97:139-147, 2002. 2000.
the nature and causes of human errors in the 32. Held J, Bruesch M, Zollinger A, et al: [Participa- 53. Hawksworth C, Asbury AJ, Millar K: Music in
intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 23:294-300, tion-oriented analysis of the anesthesia work- theatre: Not so harmonious. A survey of attitudes
1995. place. A work system for anesthesia in a to music played in the operating theatre. Anaes-
10. Frey B, Kehrer B, Losa M, et al: Comprehensive multidisciplinary operating room.] Anaesthesist thesia 52:79-83, 1997.
critical incident monitoring in a neonatal-pediat- 51:110-115, 2002. 54. Morrow D, Leirer V, Yesavage J, Tinklenberg J:
ric intensive care unit: Experience with the 33. SchulzStubner S, Jungk A, Kunitz O, Rossaint R: Alcohol, age, and piloting: Judgement, mood, and
system approach. Intensive Care Med 26:69-74, [Analysis of the anesthesiologists vigilance with actual performance. Int J Addict 26:669-683,
2000. an eye-tracking device. A pilot study for evalua- 1991.
11. Leape L: Why should we report adverse inci- tion of the method under the conditions of a 55. Talbott GD: The impaired physician movement.
dents? J Eval Clin Pract 5:1-4, 1999. modern operating theatre.] Anaesthesist 51:180- Md Med J 37:216-217, 1988.
12. Pronovost P, Wu AW, Dorman T, Morlock L: 186, 2002. 56. Talbott GD: The impaired physician: The role of
Building safety into ICU care. J Crit Care 17:78- 34. Weinger MB, Pantiskas C, Wiklund ME, the spouse in recovery. J Med Assoc Ga 76:190-
85, 2002. Carstensen P: Incorporating human factors into 192, 1987.
13. Wu AW, Pronovost P, Morlock L: ICU incident the design of medical devices. JAMA 280:1484, 57. Perrow C: Normal Accidents. New York, Basic
reporting systems. J Crit Care 17:86-94, 2002. 1998. Books, 1984.
14. Pronovost PJ, Jenckes MW, Dorman T, et al: 35. Weinger MB: Anesthesia equipment and human 58. Gaba DM, Maxwell M, DeAnda A: Anesthetic
Organizational characteristics of intensive care error. J Clin Monit Comput 15:319-323, 1999. mishaps: Breaking the chain of accident evolu-
units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic 36. BeuscartZephir MC, Anceaux F, Renard JM: tion. Anesthesiology 66:670-676, 1987.
surgery. JAMA 281:1310-1317, 1999. Integrating users activity analysis in the design 59. Galletly DC, Mushet NN: Anaesthesia system
15. Vande Voorde KM, France AC: Proactive error and assessment of medical software applications: errors. Anesth Intensive Care 19:66-73, 1991.
prevention in the intensive care unit. Crit Care The example of anesthesia. Stud Health Technol 60. Rall M, Dieckmann P: Safety culture and crisis
Nurs Clin North Am 14:347-358, 2002. Inform 77:234-238, 2000. resource management in airway management:
16. Breslow M: Assessing ICU performance using 37. Berguer R, Loeb RG, Smith WD: Use of the General principles to enhance patient safety in
administrative data. J Crit Care 16:189-195, 2001. virtual instrumentation laboratory for the assess- critical airway situations. Best Pract Res Clin
17. Lighthall GK, Barr J, Howard SK, et al: Use of a ment of human factors in surgery and anesthesia. Anaesthesiol 19:539-557, 2005.
fully simulated ICU environment for critical Stud Health Technol Inform 39:187-194, 1997. 61. Cooke NJ, Salas E, CannonBowers JA, Stout RJ:
event management training for internal medicine 38. Holst D, Rudolph P, Wendt M: [Practical realiza- Measuring team knowledge. Hum Factors 42:151-
residents. Crit Care Med 31:2437-2443, 2003. tion of a patient-accompanying concept in anes- 173, 2000.
18. Colliver JA, Schwartz MH: Assessing clinical thesia and intensive care.] Anasthesiol 62. Cooke NJ, Gorman JC, Duran JL, Taylor AR:
performance with standardized patients. JAMA Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 35:25-29, Team cognition in experienced command-and-
278:790-791, 1997. 2000. control teams. J Exp Psychol Appl 13:146-157,
19. Devitt JH, Kurreck MM, Cohen MM, Cleave 39. Orasanu J, Connolly T, Klein G, et al: The Rein- 2007.
Hogg D: The validity of performance assessments vention of Decision Making. Norwood, NJ, Ablex, 63. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Kitz RJ: An analysis of
using simulation. Anesthesiology 95:36-42, 2001. 1993. major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia
20. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Flanagan B, et al: Assess- 40. Reason J: The contribution of latent human fail- management: Considerations for prevention and
ment of clinical performance during simulated ures to the breakdown of complex systems. Philos detection. Anesthesiology 60:34-42, 1984.
crises using both technical and behavioral ratings. Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 327:475-484, 1990. 64. Sagan S: Toward a political theory of organiza-
Anesthesiology 89:8-18, 1998. 41. Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA: The evo- tional reliability. J Contingencies Crisis Manage
21. Greaves JD, Grant J: Watching anaesthetists work: lution of crew resource management training in 2:228-240, 1994.
Using the professional judgement of consultants commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol 9:19-32, 65. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Jump B: Production pres-
to assess the developing clinical competence of 1999. sure in the work environment. California anes-
trainees. Br J Anaesth 84:525-533, 2000. 42. SeckerWalker J, TaylorAdams S, Vincent C: thesiologists attitudes and experiences.
22. Mackieh A, Cilingir C: Effects of performance Clinical Incident Reporting, Clinical Risk Man- Anesthesiology 81:488-500, 1994.
shaping factors on human error. Int J Indust agementEnhancing Patient Safety. London, 66. PateCornell ME, Lakats LM, Murphy DM, Gaba
Ergonom 22:285-292, 1998. BMJ Books, 2001, pp 419-438. DM: Anesthesia patient risk: A quantitative
23. Xiao Y, Hunter W, Mackenzie CF, et al: Task com- 43. Reason JT, Carthey J, de Leval MR: Diagnosing approach to organizational factors and risk
A plexity in emergency medical care and its impli
cations for team coordination. Hum Factors
vulnerable system syndrome: An essential pre-
requisite to effective risk management. Qual
management options. Risk Analysis 17:511-523,
1997.
161 6
67. PateCornell E: Finding and fixing systems weak- 90. Rall M, Manser T, Guggenberger H, et al: [Patient Germany, Steinkopf, 2007, pp 122-137.
nesses: Probabilistic methods and applications of safety and errors in medicine: Development, pre- 111. DeAnda A, Gaba DM: Unplanned incidents

engineering risk analysis. Risk Analysis 22:319- vention and analyses of incidents.] Patientensi- during comprehensive anesthesia simulation.
334, 2002. cherheit und Fehler in der Medizin. Entstehung, Anesth Analg 71:77-82, 1990.
68. Rall M, Decker K, Manser T: Enhancing patient Pravention und Analyse von Zwischenfallen. 112. Gaba DM, DeAnda A: A comprehensive anesthe-
safety on a system levelresults of an interdisci- Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmer- sia simulation environment: Re-creating the
plinary process-oriented analysis of the organisa- zther 36:321-330, 2001. operating room for research and training. Anes-
tional context in anaesthesia (Erhhung der 91. Hilfiker D: Facing our mistakes. N Engl J Med thesiology 69:387-394, 1988.
Patientensicherheit auf SystemebeneErgebnisse 310:118-122, 1984. 113. Gaba DM: Human error in anesthetic mishaps.
einer interdisziplinren, prozessorientierten 92. Wu AW: Medical error: The second victim. The Int Anesthesiol Clin 27:137-147, 1989.
Analyse der organisationalen Unpublished doctor who makes the mistake needs help too 114. Shirely PJ: Reducing error, improving safety.

manuscript. [editorial]. BMJ 320:726-727, 2000. Crew resource management training should
69. Rasmussen J: The role of error in organizing 93. Dieckmann P, Wehner T, Rall M, Manser T: Pros- be mandatory in anaesthesia. BMJ 321:508-509,
behaviour. Qual Saf Health Care 12:377-383, pektive Simulation: Ein Konzept zur methodis- 2000.
2003. chen Ergnzung von medizinischen 115. Salas E, Bowers CA, Edens E: Improving Team-
70. Reason J: Human error: Models and manage- Simulatorsettings. Z Arbeitswissenschaften work in OrganizationsApplications of Resource
ment. West J Med 172:393-396, 2000. 59:172-180, 2005. Management Training. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence
71. Helmreich RL: Managing human error in avia- 94. Vincent CA: Analysis of clinical incidents: A Erlbaum, 2001.
tion. Sci Am 276:62-67, 1997. window on the system not a search for root 116. Salas E, Prince C, Bowers CA, et al: A methodol-
72. Flin R: Safety in health care: Research on safety is causes. Qual Saf Health Care 13:242-243, 2004. ogy for enhancing crew resource management

I
happening. BMJ 336:171, 2008. 95. Vincent C: Understanding and responding training. Hum Factors 41:161-172, 1999.
73. Pronovost PJ, Thompson DA, Holzmueller CG, to adverse events. N Engl J Med 348:1051-1056, 117. Salas E, Rhodenizer L, Bowers CA: The design
et al: Toward learning from patient safety report- 2003. and delivery of crew resource management train-
ing systems. J Crit Care 21:305-315, 2006. 96. Vincent C, TaylorAdams S: The Investigation ing: Exploiting available resources. Hum Factors
74. Thompson DA, Lubomski L, Holzmueller C, et al: and Analysis of Clinical Incidents, Clinical Risk 42:490-511, 2000.
Integrating the intensive care unit safety report- ManagementEnhancing Patient Safety. 118. Jacobsen J, Lindekaer AL, Ostergaard HT, et al:
ing system with existing incident reporting London, BMJ Books, 2001, pp 439-460. Management of anaphylactic shock evaluated
systems. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 31:585-593, 97. Flin R, Burns C, Mearns K, et al: Measuring safety using a full-scale anaesthesia simulator. Acta
2005. climate in health care. Qual Saf Health Care Anaesthesiol Scand 45:315-319, 2001.
75. Holzmueller CG, Pronovost PJ, Dickman F, et al: 15:109-115, 2006. 119. Helmreich RL, Foushee CH, Benson R, Russini
Creating the web-based intensive care unit safety 98. Runciman WB, Merry A: A tragic death: A time W: Cockpit resource management: Exploring the
reporting system. J Am Med Inform Assoc to blame or a time to learn? Qual Saf Health Care attitude-performance linkage. Aviat Space
12:130-139, 2005. 12:321-322, 2003. Environ Med 57:1198-1200, 1986.
76. Leape L: Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J 99. Runciman B, Merry A, Smith AM: Improving 120. Helmreich RL: Does CRM training work? Air
Med 347:1633-1638, 2002. patients safety by gathering information. BMJ Line Pilot 60:17-20, 1991.
77. World Health Organization: WHO Draft Guide- 323:298, 2001. 121. Federal Aviation Administration: Crew Resource
lines for Adverse Event Reporting and Learning 100. Williamson JA, Webb RK, Sellen A, et al: The Management Training. Advisory Circular No.
SystemsFrom Information to Action. Geneva, Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Human 120-51C, 1998.
WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety, 2005, pp failure: An analysis of 2000 incident reports. 122. Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, Wightman DC:
1-72. Anaesth Intensive Care 21:678-683, 1993. Does crew resource management training work?
78. Runciman WB, Sellen A, Webb RK, et al: The 101. Runciman WB: Report from the Australian
An update, an extension, and some critical needs.
Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Errors, Patient Safety Foundation: Australasian Incident Hum Factors 48:392-412, 2006.
incidents and accidents in anaesthetic practice. Monitoring Study. Anaesth Intensive Care 123. Reader TW, Flin R, Mearns K, Cuthbertson

Anaesth Intensive Care 21:506-519, 1993. 17:107-108, 1989. BH: Interdisciplinary communication in the
79. Staender S, Davies J, Helmreich B, et al: The 102. Pronovost PJ, Martinez EA, RodriguezPaz JM: intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 98:347-352,
anaesthesia critical incident reporting system: An Removing orange wires: Surfacing and hope- 2007.
experience based database. Int J Med Inf 47:87- fully learning from mistakes. Intensive Care Med 124. Holzman RS, Cooper JB, Gaba DM, et al: Anes-
90, 1997. 32:1467-1469, 2006. thesia crisis resource management: Real-life
80. Leape LL: Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J 103. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Goeschel CA,
simulation training in operating room crises. J
Med 347:1633-1638, 2002. et al: Creating high reliability in health care Clin Anesth 7:675-687, 1995.
81. Morgan C: Incident reporting in anaesthesia. organizations. Health Serv Res 41:1599-1617, 125. Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Howard SK: Crisis Manage-
Anaesth Intensive Care 16:98-100, 1988. 2006. ment in Anesthesiology. New York, Churchill
82. Williamson J: Critical incident reporting in 104. Rall M, Dieckmann P: Characteristics of effective Livingstone, 1994.
anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 16:101-103, incident reporting systems: To enhance patient 126. Pan E, Cusack C, Hook J, et al: The value of pro-
1988. safety, to learn from problems, errors and good vider-to-provider telehealth. Telemed J E Health
83. Runciman WB, Webb RK, Lee R, Holland R: The solutions. In Bannister J (ed): Euroanesthesia 14:446-453, 2008.
Australian Incident Monitoring Study. System 2007. Munich, European Society of Anaesthesiol- 127. Thomas EJ, Taggart B, Crandell S, et al: Teaching
failure: An analysis of 2000 incident reports. ogy, 2007, pp 179-186. teamwork during the Neonatal Resuscitation
Anaesth Intensive Care 21:684-695, 1993. 105. FirthCozens J: Barriers to incident reporting. Program: A randomized trial. J Perinatol 27:409-
84. Schwilk B, Muche R, Bothner U, et al: [Quality Qual Saf Health Care 11:7, 2002. 414, 2007.
control in anesthesiology. Results of a prospective 106. Leape LL: A systems analysis approach to medical 128. Reader T, Flin R, Lauche K, Cuthbertson BH:
study following the recommendations of the error. J Eval Clin Pract 3:213-222, 1997. Non-technical skills in the intensive care unit. Br
German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive 107. Cullen DJ, Bates DW, Small SD, et al: The incident J Anaesth 96:551-559, 2006.
Care.] Anaesthesist 44:242-249, 1995. reporting system does not detect adverse drug 129. Yule S, Flin R, PatersonBrown S, Maran N:

85. Short TG, Oregan A, Jayasuriya JP, et al: Improve- events: A problem for quality improvement. Jt Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating
ments in anaesthetic care resulting from a critical Comm J Qual Improv 21:541-548, 1995. room: A review of the literature. Surgery 139:140-
incident reporting programme. Anaesthesia 51: 108. Rall M, Martin J, Geldner G, et al: Charakteristika 149, 2006.
615-621, 1996. effektiver IncidentReporting-Systeme zur Erh- 130. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Flanagan B, et al: Assess-
86. OLeary M, Chappell SL: Confidential incident hung der Patientensicherheit [Characteristics of ment of clinical performance during simulated
reporting systems create vital awareness of safety effective incident reporting systems for the crises using both technical and behavioral ratings.
problems. ICAO J 51:11-13, 27, 1996. increase of patient safety]. Anaesthesiol Inten- Anesthesiology 89:8-18, 1998.
87. Vincent C, Stanhope N, CrowleyMurphy M: sivmed 47:9-19, 2006. 131. DeKeyser V, Woods DD, Masson M, Van Daele
Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: An 109. Howard SK, Gaba DM, Fish KJ, et al: Anesthesia A: Fixation errors in dynamic and complex
empirical study. J Eval Clin Pract 5:13-21, 1999. crisis resource management training: Teaching systems: Descriptive forms, psychological mecha-
88. Thomas AN, Pilkington CE, Greer R: Critical anesthesiologists to handle critical incidents. nisms, potential countermeasures. Technical
incident reporting in UK intensive care units: A Aviat Space Environ Med 63:763-770, 1992. Report for NATO Division of Scientific Affairs,
postal survey. J Eval Clin Pract 9:59-68, 2003. 110. Rall M, Dieckmann P, Stricker E: Erhhung der 1988.
89. Barach P, Small SD: Reporting and preventing Patientensicherheit durch effektive Incident 132. DeKeyser V, Woods DD, Colombo AG, Busta-
medical mishaps: Lessons from non-medical Reporting Systeme am Beispiel von PaSIS. In mante AS: Fixation errors: Failures to revise situ-
near miss reporting systems. BMJ 320:759-763,
2000.
Ennker J, Pietrowski D, Kleine P (eds): Risikoman-
agement in der operativen Medizin. Darmstadt,
ation assessment in dynamic and risky systems.
In Systems Reliability Assessment. Dordrecht,
A
I 162

Germany, Kluwer Academic, 1990, p 231. performance. Anaesthesia 53:195-197, 1998. differences. J Sleep Res 4:57-61, 1995.
133. Risser DT, Rice MM, Salisbury ML, et al: The 155. Morris GN: Reading in the operating theatre.
181. Roth T, Roehrs T, Zorick F: Sleepiness: Its meas-
potential for improved teamwork to reduce Anaesthesia 50:1089-1090, 1995. urement and determinants. Sleep 5:S128-S134,
medical errors in the emergency department. The 156. Miles C, Auburn TC, Jones DM: Effects of loud 1982.
MedTeams Research Consortium. Ann Emerg noise and signal probability on visual vigilance. 182. Richardson GS, Carskadon MA, Flagg W, et al:
Med 34:373-383, 1999. Ergonomics 27:855-862, 1984. Excessive daytime sleepiness in man: Multiple
134. Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, et al: Error reduction 157. Murthy VSSN, Malhotra SK, Bala I, Raghunathan sleep latency measurement in narcoleptic and
and performance improvement in the emergency M: Detrimental effects of noise on anaesthetists. control subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro-
department through formal teamwork training: Can J Anaesth 42:608-611, 1995. physiol 45:621-627, 1978.
Evaluation of results of the MedTeams project. 158. Murthy VSSN, Malhotra SK, Bala I, Raghunathan 183. Carskadon MA, Dement WC, Mitler MM, et al:
Health Serv Res 37:1553-1581, 2002. M: Auditory functions in anaesthesia residents Guidelines for the Multiple Sleep Latency Test
135. Rosen MA, Salas E, Wu TS, et al: Promoting team- during exposure to operating room noise. Indian (MSLT): A standard measure of sleepiness. Sleep
work: An event-based approach to simulation- J Med Res 101:213-216, 1995. 9:519-524, 1986.
based teamwork training for emergency medicine 159. Allen K, Blascovich J: Effects of music on cardio- 184. Howard SK, Rosekind MR, Katz JD, Berry AJ:
residents (published online ahead of print July 14, vascular reactivity among surgeons. JAMA Fatigue in anesthesia: Implications and strategies
2008). Acad Emerg Med. 15(11):1190-1198, 2008. 272:882-884, 1994. for patient and provider safety. Anesthesiology
136. Birnbach DJ, Salas E: Can medical simulation and 160. Weinger MB: Cardiovascular reactivity among
97:1281-1294, 2002.
team training reduce errors in labor and delivery? surgeons: Not music to everyones ears. JAMA 185. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Long CD, McPeek B:
Anesthesiol Clin 26:159-168, viii, 2008. 273:1090-1091, 1995. Preventable anesthesia mishaps: A study of
137. Sundar E, Sundar S, Pawlowski J, et al: Crew 161. Stevenson GW, Hall SC: Cardiovascular reactivity human factors. Anesthesiology 49:399-406, 1978.
resource management and team training. Anes- among surgeons: Not music to everyones ears 186. Billings CE, Reynard WD: Human factors in air-
thesiol Clin 25:283-300, 2007. [letter]. JAMA 273:1090, 1995. craft incidents: Results of a 7-year study. Aviat
138. Nielsen PE, Goldman MB, Mann S, et al: Effects 162.
Allen K, Blascovich J: Cardiovascular Space Environ Med 55:960-965, 1984.
of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and reactivity among surgeons: Not music to 187. Dinges DF, Pack F, Williams K, et al: Cumulative
process of care in labor and delivery: A rand- everyones ears: In reply [letter]. JAMA 273:1091, sleepiness, mood disturbance, and psychomotor
omized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 109:48- 1995. vigilance performance decrements during a week
55, 2007. 163. Schneider W, Detweiler M: The role of practice in of sleep restricted to 4-5 hours per night. Sleep
139. Marshall DA, Manus DA: A team training
dual-task performance: Toward workload mode- 20:267-277, 1997.
program using human factors to enhance patient ling in a connectionist/control architecture. Hum 188. Fletcher KE, Davis SQ, Underwood W, et al: Sys-
safety. AORN J 86:994-1011, 2007. Factors 30:539-566, 1988. tematic review: Effects of resident work hours
140. Dunn EJ, Mills PD, Neily J, et al: Medical team 164. Weinger MB: In my opinion: Lack of outcome on patient safety. Ann Intern Med 141:851-857,
training: Applying crew resource management in data makes reading a personal decision. APSF 2004.
the Veterans Health Administration. Jt Comm J Newsl 10:13-16, 1995. 189. Fletcher KE, Underwood W 3rd, Davis SQ, et al:
Qual Patient Saf 33:317-325, 2007. 165. Weinger MB: OR reading debate continues in my Effects of work hour reduction on residents lives:
141. Morgan PJ, CleaveHogg D: Evaluation of
opinion: Lack of outcome data makes reading a A systematic review. JAMA 294:1088-1100, 2005.
medical students performance using the anaes- personal decision, states OR investigator. J Clin 190. Mycyk MB, McDaniel MR, Fotis MA, Regalado J:
thesia simulator. Med Educ 34:42-45, 2000. Monit 12:109-110, 1996. Hospitalwide adverse drug events before and after
142. Glavin RJ, Maran NJ: Development and use of 166. Mitler MM, Carskadon MA, Czeisler CA, et al: limiting weekly work hours of medical residents.
scoring systems for assessment of clinical compe- Catastrophes, sleep, and public policy: Consensus Am J Health Syst Pharm 62:1592-1595, 2005.
tence. Br J Anaesth 88:329-330, 2002. report. Sleep 11:100-109, 1988. 191. Kaafarani HM, Itani KM, Petersen LA, et al: Does
143. Gaba DM, Botney R, Howard SK, et al: Interrater 167. Gaba DM, Howard SK: Patient safety: Fatigue resident hours reduction have an impact on surgi-
reliability of performance assessment tools for among clinicians and the safety of patients. N cal outcomes? J Surg Res 126:167-171, 2005.
the management of simulated anesthetic crises Engl J Med 347:1249-1255, 2002. 192. Landrigan CP, Barger LK, Cade BE, et al: Interns
[abstract]. Anesthesiology 81:A1277, 1994. 168. Howard SK, Gaba DM, Rosekind MR, Zarcone compliance with Accreditation Council for Grad-
144. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Small SD: Situation
VP: The risks and implications of excessive uate Medical Education work-hour limits. JAMA
awareness in anesthesiology. Hum Factors 37:20- daytime sleepiness in resident physicians. Acad 296:1063-1070, 2006.
31, 1995. Med 77:1019-1025, 2002. 193. Costa G, Sartori S, Akerstedt T: Influence of flex-
145. Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN, et al: Teamwork 169. Carskadon MA, Dement WC, Kryger MH, Roth ibility and variability of working hours on health
in the operating theatre: Cohesion or confusion? T: Normal Human Sleep: An Overview. Philadel- and well-being. Chronobiol Int 23:1125-1137,
J Eval Clin Pract 12:182-189, 2006. phia, WB Saunders, 2000. 2006.
146. Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P, et al: Anaesthe- 170. Carskadon MA, Dement WC: Cumulative effects 194. Costa G, Akerstedt T, Nachreiner F, et al: Flexible
tists NonTechnical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of of sleep restriction on daytime sleepiness. Psycho- working hours, health, and well-being in Europe:
a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth physiology 18:107-113, 1981. Some considerations from a SALTSA project.
90(5):580-588, 2003. 171. Doran SM, Van Dongen HP, Dinges DF: Sus- Chronobiol Int 21:831-844, 2004.
147. Howard SK, Gaba DM, Fish KJ, et al: Anesthesia tained attention performance during sleep depri- 195. Lockley SW, Cronin JW, Evans EE, et al: Harvard
crisis resource management training: Teaching vation: Evidence of state instability. Arch Ital Biol Work Hours H, and Safety Group: Effect of reduc-
anesthesiologists to handle critical incidents. 139:253-267, 2001. ing interns weekly work hours on sleep and atten-
Aviat Space Environ Med 63:763-770, 1992. 172. Akerstedt T, Kecklund G: Age, gender and early tional failures. N Engl J Med 351:1829-1837,
148. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Fish KJ, et al: Simulation- morning highway accidents. J Sleep Res 10:105- 2004.
based training in anesthesia crisis resource man- 110, 2001. 196. Landrigan CP, Rothschild JM, Cronin JW, et al:
agement (ACRM): A decade of experience. 173. Akerstedt T, Ficca G: Alertness-enhancing drugs Effect of reducing interns work hours on serious
Simulation Gaming 32:175-193, 2001. as a countermeasure to fatigue in irregular work medical errors in intensive care units. N Engl J
149. Roberts KH, Tadmor CT: Lessons learned from hours. Chronobiol Int 14:145-158, 1997. Med 351:1838-1848, 2004.
non-medical industries: The tragedy of the USS 174. Engel W, Seime R, Powell V, Doe J: Clinical per- 197. Barger LK, Cade BE, Ayas NT, et al: Harvard
Greeneville. Qual Saf Health Care 11:355-357, formance of interns after being on call. South Work Hours H, and Safety Group: Extended work
2002. Med J 80:761-763, 1987. shifts and the risk of motor vehicle crashes among
150. Yule S, Flin R, Maran N, et al: Surgeons non- 175. Friedman RC, Kornfeld DS, Bigger TJ: Psychoso- interns. N Engl J Med 352:125-134, 2005.
technical skills in the operating room: Reliability cial problems associated with sleep deprivation in 198. Weinger MB, AncoliIsrael S: Sleep deprivation
testing of the NOTSS Behavior Rating System. interns. J Med Educ 48:436-441, 1973. and clinical performance. JAMA 287:955-957,
World J Surg 32:548-556, 2008. 176. Pankratz H: Witness: Doctor Dozed. Denver Post, 2002.
151. Flin R, Yule S, PatersonBrown S, et al: Teaching 1995:1A. 199. Howard SK, Gaba DM: Factors influencing vigi-
surgeons about non-technical skills. Surgeon 177. Rosekind MR, Gander PH, Miller DL, et al:
lance and performance of anaethetists. Curr Opin
5:86-89, 2007. Fatigue in operational settings: Examples from Anaesthesiol 11:651-657, 1998.
152. Yule S, Flin R, PatersonBrown S, et al: Develop- the aviation environment. Hum Factors 36:327- 200. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Jump B: Production pres-
ment of a rating system for surgeons non-techni- 338, 1994. sure in the work environment. California anes-
cal skills. Med Educ 40:1098-1104, 2006. 178. Howard SK, Gaba DM, Smith BE, et al: Simula- thesiologists attitudes and experiences.
153. Koch ME, Kain ZN, Ayoub C, Rosenbaum SH: tion study of rested versus sleep-deprived anes- Anesthesiology 81:488-500, 1994.
The sedative and analgesic sparing effect of music. thesiologists. Anesthesiology 98:1345-1355, 2003. 201. Gravenstein JS, Cooper JB, Orkin FK: Work and
Anesthesiology 89:300-306, 1998. 179. Costa G: The problem: Shiftwork. Chronobiol Int rest cycles in anesthesia practice. Anesthesiology
A 154. Hawksworth CR, Sivalingam P, Asbury AJ: The
effect of music on anaesthetists psychomotor
14:89-98, 1997.
180. Harma M: Sleepiness and shiftwork: Individual
72:737-742, 1990.
202. Gander PH, Merry A, Millar MM, Weller J: Hours
163 6
of work and fatigue-related error: A survey of sicians: Analysis of specialty. JAMA 257:2927- of anaesthesia. Cognition Tech Work 4:71-81,
New Zealand anaesthetists. Anaesth Intensive 2930, 1987. 2002.
Care 28:178-183, 2000. 225. Pierce EC Jr: Anesthesiologists leadership in
247. Manser T, Dieckmann P, Wehner T, Rall M: Com-
203. Rosekind MR, Neri DF, Gregory KB, et al: A patient safety. Probl Anesth 13:425-429, 2001. parison of anaesthetists activity patterns in the
NASA education and training module on alert- 226. Gaba DM, Evans DA, Patel VL: Dynamic Deci- operating room and during simulation. Ergo-
ness management: A survey of implementation sionMaking in Anesthesiology: Cognitive nomics 50:246-260, 2007.
and application [abstract]. Sleep 24(Suppl):A415, Models and Training Approaches. Berlin, 248. Manser T: Dichte als Merkmal komplexer Arbe-
2001. SpringerVerlag, 1992. itshandlungen. In Wehner T, Manser T (eds):
204. SmithCoggins R, Howard SK, Mac DT, et al: 227. Cook RI, Woods DD: Implications of automation Komplexes Handeln in der Ansthesie. Lenger-
Improving alertness and performance in emer- surprises in aviation for the future of total intra- ich, Germany, Pabst, 2003, pp 100-174.
gency department physicians and nurses: The use venous anesthesia (TIVA). J Clin Anesth 8:29s- 249. Manser T, Rall M, Schaedle B, et al: Comparison
of planned naps. Ann Emerg Med 48:596-604, 37s, 1996. of action density patterns between simulator and
2006. 228. Xiao Y, Milgram P, Doyle DJ: Incident evolution clinical settings [Abstract Santander-02-11]. Eur
205. Cooper JB, Long CD, Newbower RS, Philip JH: and task demands: An analysis and a field study J Anaesthesiol 20:843-844, 2003.
Critical incidents associated with intraoperative of going sour incidents [abstract]. Paper pre- 250. Sarter NB, Woods DD: Situation awareness: A
exchanges of anesthesia personnel. Anesthesiol- sented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Human critical but ill-defined phenomenon. Int J Aviat
ogy 56:456-461, 1982. Factors Society, 1992, pp 1279-1283. Psychol 1:45-57, 1991.
206. Cooper JB: Do short breaks increase or decrease 229. Gaba DM: Human performance issues in anes- 251. Hartman BO, Secrist GE: Situational awareness is
anesthetic risk? J Clin Anesth 1:228-231, 1989. thesia patient safety. Probl Anesth 5:329-350, more than exceptional vision. Aviat Space
207. Jewett ME, Dijk DJ, Kronauer RE, Dinges DF: 1991. Environ Med 62:1084-1089, 1991.

I
Dose-response relationship between sleep dura- 230. Cook RI, Woods DD, Howie MB, et al: Uninten- 252. Secrist GE, Hartman BO: Situational awareness:
tion and human psychomotor vigilance and sub- tional delivery of vasoactive drugs with an elec- The trainability of the near-threshold information
jective alertness. Sleep 22:171-179, 1999. tromechanical infusion device. J Cardiothorac acquisition domain. Aviat Space Environ Med
208. Czeisler CA, Cajochen C, Turek FW, et al: Mela- Anesth 6:238-244, 1992. 64:885-892, 1993.
tonin in the Regulation of Sleep and Circadian 231. Cook RI, Potter SS, Woods DD, McDonald JS: 253. Westenskow DR, Orr JA, Simon FH, et al: Intel-
Rhythms. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2000. Evaluating the human engineering of micropro- ligent alarms reduce anesthesiologists response
209. Gill M, Haerich P, Westcott K, et al: Cognitive cessor-controlled operating room devices. J Clin time to critical faults. Anesthesiology 77:1074-
performance following modafinil versus placebo Monit 7:217-226, 1991. 1079, 1992.
in sleep-deprived emergency physicians: A dou- 232. Sonenberg EA, Lawrence JA, Zelcer J: Modeling 254. Tversky A, Kahneman D: Judgement under

ble-blind randomized crossover study. Acad disturbance management in anesthesia: A pre- uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science
Emerg Med 13:158-165, 2006. liminary report. Artif Intell Med 4:447-461, 1992. 185:1124-1131, 1974.
210. Czeisler CA, Johnson MP, Duffy JF, et al: Expo- 233. Klemola UM, Norros L: Analysis of the clinical 255. Cook RI, Woods DD, McDonald JS: Human

sure to bright light and darkness to treat physio- behavior of anesthetists: Recognition of uncer- Performance in Anesthesia: A Corpus of Cases.
logic maladaptation to night work. N Engl J Med tainty as a basis for practice. Med Educ 31:449- Columbus, OH, Cognitive Systems Engineering
322:1253-1259, 1990. 456, 1997. Laboratory, Department of Industrial and
211. Rendell PG, Craik FI: Virtual week and actual 234. Mackenzie MD, Horst RL, Mahaffey MA: Group Systems Engineering, Ohio State University, 1991.
week: Age-related differences in prospective decision-making during trauma patient resuscita- 256. Hall KH: Reviewing intuitive decision-making

memory. Appl Cogn Psychol 14:S43-S62, 2000. tion and anesthesia. Paper presented at 37th and uncertainty: The implications for medical
212. Denney NW, Poon LW, Rubin DC, Wilson BA: Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergo- education. Med Educ 36:216-224, 2002.
Everyday Problem Solving: Methodological nomics Society, 1993, pp 372-376. 257. Klein GA, Klein G, Orasanu J, et al: A Recogni-
Issues, Research Findings, and a Model. Cam- 235. Weinger MB, Slagle J: Human factors research in tionPrimed Decision (RPD) Model of Rapid
bridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1989. anesthesia patient safety. Paper presented a sym- Decision Making. Norwood, NJ, Ablex, 1993.
213. Leirer VO, Yesavage JA, Morrow DG: Marijuana, posium of the American Medical Informatics 258. Schwid HA, ODonnell D: Anesthesiologists

aging, and task difficulty effects on pilot perfor- Association, 2001, pp 756-760. management of simulated critical incidents.
mance. Aviat Space Environ Med 60:1145-1152, 236. Klein GA: Recognition-primed decisions. Adv
Anesthesiology 76:495-501, 1992.
1989. Man Machine Sys Res 5:47-92, 1989. 259. DeAnda A, Gaba DM: Role of experience in the
214. Johnson MM: Age differences in decision making: 237. Rasmussen J: Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, response to simulated critical incidents. Anesth
A process methodology for examining strategic signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in Analg 72:308-315, 1991.
information processing. J Gerontol 45(2):P75- human performance models. IEEE Trans Systems 260. Botney R, Gaba DM, Howard SK, Jump B: The
P78, 1990. Man Cybernetics 13:257-266, 1983. role of fixation error in preventing the detection
215. Talbott GD: Treating impaired physicians: Four- 238. Norman DA: Categorization of action slips.
and correction of a simulated volatile anesthetic
teen keys to success. Va Med 113:95-99, 1986. Psychol Rev 88:1-15, 1981. overdose [abstract]. Anesthesiology 79:A1115,
216. Talbott GD: Alcoholism and other drug addic- 239. Reason J, Rasmussen J, Duncan K, Leplat J:
1993.
tions: A primary disease entity. J Med Assoc Ga Generic ErrorModeling System (GEMS): A 261. Gaba DM: Improving anesthesiologists perfor-
75:490-494, 1986. Cognitive Framework for Locating Common mance by simulating reality [editorial]. Anesthe-
217. Spiegelman WG, Saunders L, Mazze RI: Addic- Human Error Forms. Chichester, UK, Wiley, siology 76:491-494, 1992.
tion and anesthesiology. Anesthesiology 60:335- 1987. 262. Kurrek MM, Fish KJ: Anesthesia crisis resource
341, 1984. 240. Reason J: Modelling the basic error tendencies of management training: An intimidating concept, a
218. Menk EJ, Baumgarten RK, Kingsley CP, et al: human operators. Reliability Engineering System rewarding experience. Can J Anesth 43:430-434,
Success of reentry into anesthesiology training Saf 20:137-153, 1988. 1996.
programs by residents with a history of substance 241. Boquet G, Bushman JA, Davenport HT: The
263. Holzman RS, Cooper JB, Gaba DM, et al: Anes-
abuse. JAMA 263:3060-3062, 1990. anaesthetic machine, a study of function and thesia crisis resource management: Real-life
219. Yesavage JA, Leirer VO: Hangover effects on air- design. Br J Anaesth 52:61-67, 1980. simulation training in operating room crises. J
craft pilots 14 hours after alcohol ingestion: A 242. McDonald JS, Dzwonczyk RR: A time and
Clin Anesth 7:675-687, 1995.
preliminary report. Am J Psychiatry 143:1546- motion study of the anaesthetists intraoperative 264. Cooper JB: Toward prevention of anesthetic

1550, 1986. time. Br J Anaesth 61:738-742, 1988. mishaps. Int Anesthesiol Clin 22:167-183, 1984.
220. Morrow D, Yesavage J, Leirer V, Tinklenberg J: 243. McDonald JS, Dzwoncyzk R, Gupta B, Dahl M: 265. Feigal DW, Gardner SN, McClellan M: Ensuring
Influence of aging and practice on piloting tasks. A second time-motion study of the anesthetists safe and effective medical devices. N Engl J Med
Exp Aging Res 19:53-70, 1993. intraoperative period. Br J Anaesth 64:582-585, 348:191-192, 2003.
221. Morrow D, Leirer V, Yesavage J: The influence of 1990. 266. Grosjean V, Terrier P: Temporal awareness:

alcohol and aging on radio communication 244. Weinger MB, Herndon OW, Zornow MH, et al: Pivotal in performance? Ergonomics 42:1443-
during flight. Aviat Space Environ Med 61:12-20, An objective methodology for task analysis and 1456, 1999.
1990. workload assessment in anesthesia providers. 267. Sloan FA, WhettenGoldstein K, Stout EM, et al:
222. Spiegel K, Leproult R, Van Cauter E: Impact of Anesthesiology 80:77-92, 1994. No-fault system of compensation for obstetric
sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. 245. Weinger MB, Herdon OW, Gaba DM: The effect injury: Winners and losers. Obstet Gynecol
Lancet 354:1435-1439, 1999. of electronic record keeping and transesophageal 91:437-443, 1998.
223. Spiegelman WG, Mazze RI: Addiction and anes- echocardiography on task distribution, workload, 268. Shrestha LB, Prince C, Baker DP, Salas E: Under-
thesiology. Anesthesiology 60:335-341, 1984. and vigilance during cardiac anesthesia. Anesthe- standing situation awareness: Concepts, methods,
224. Talbott GD, Gallegos KV, Wilson PO, Porter TL: siology 87:144-155, 1997. and training. Hum Technol Interact Complex Syst
The Medical Association of Georgias Impaired
Physicians Program. Review of the first 1000 phy-
246. Manser T, Wehner T: Analysing action sequences:
Variations in action density in the administration
7:45-83, 1995.
269. McNeese M, Salas E, Engbers FH: New Trends
A
I 164

in Cooperative ActivitiesUnderstanding siologists present checkout methods and the emergencies. Br J Anaesth 79:689-690, 1997.
System Dynamics in Complex Environments. validity of the FDA checklist. Anesthesiology 314. Gaba DM, Howard S, Smith B, Weinger MB:

Santa Monica, CA, Human Factors and Ergo- 75:724-729, 1991. Simulators in anesthesiology education. Anesth
nomics Society, 2001. 292. Lees DE: FDA preanesthesia checklist being eval- Analg 89:805-806, 1999.
270. Dieckmann P, Reddersen S, Wehner T, Rall M: uated, revised. Anesth Patient Saf Found Newsl 315. Halamek LP, Howard SK, Smith BE, et al: Devel-
Prospective memory failures as an unexplored 6:25-27, 1991. opment of a simulated delivery room for the study
threat to patient safety: Results from a pilot study 293. FDA publishes final version of revised apparatus of human performance during neonatal resuscita-
using patient simulators to investigate the missed checkout. Anesth Patient Saf Found Newsl 9:35, tion. Pediatrics 100(Suppl):513-524, 1997.
execution of intentions. Ergonomics 49:526-543, 1994. 316. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al: Simu-
2006. 294. Manley R, Cuddeford JD: An assessment of the lation technology for health care professional
271. Hazlehurst: The cockpit multiple activity system: effectiveness of the revised FDA checklist. AANA skills training and assessment. JAMA 282:861-
A computational model. Int J Aviat Psychol 13:1- J 64:277-282, 1996. 866, 1999.
22, 2003. 295. Blike G, Biddle C: Preanesthesia detection of
317. Morgan PJ, CleaveHogg D, McLlory J, Devitt
272. Altman EM, Gray WD: Memory for goals: An equipment faults by anesthesia providers at an JH: Simulation technology: A comparison of
activation-based model. Cognitive Sci 26:39-83, academic hospital: Comparison of standard prac- experimental and visual learning for undergradu-
2002. tice and a new electronic checklist. AANA J ate medical students. Anesthesiology 96:10-16,
273. Dismukes K: Cockpit interruptions and distrac- 68:497-505, 2000. 2002.
tions. ASRS Directline 10:4-9, 1998. 296. Berkenstadt H, Yusim Y, Ziv A, et al: An assess- 318. Weller JM, Bloch M, Young S, et al: Evaluation of
274. Stone M, Dismukes K, Remington R: Prospective ment of a point-of-care information system for high fidelity patient simulator in assessment of
memory in dynamic environments: Effects of the anesthesia provider in simulated malignant performance of anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 90:43-
load, delay, and phonological rehearsal. Memory hyperthermia crisis. Anesth Analg 102:530-532, 47, 2003.
9:165-176, 2001. 2006. 319. Schwid HA, Rooke GA, Carline J, et al: Evaluation
275. Marsh RL: The demands of an ongoing
297. Berkenstadt H, Yusim Y, Katznelson R, et al: A of anesthesia residents using mannequin-based
activity influence the success of evidence-based novel point-of-care information system reduces simulation: A multiinstitutional study. Anesthesi-
prospective memory. Psychon Bull Rev 9:604- anaesthesiologists errors while managing case ology 97:1434-1444, 2002.
610, 2002. scenarios. Eur J Anaesthesiol 23:239-250, 2006. 320. Drui AB, Behm RJ, Martin WE: Predesign inves-
276. Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell 298. Forrest JB, Cahalan MK, Rehder K: Multicenter tigation of the anesthesia operational environ-
WH: Emergency department workplace interrup- study of general anesthesia. II. Results. Anesthe- ment. Anesth Analg 52:584-591, 1973.
tions: Are emergency physicians interrupt- siology 72:262-268, 1990. 321. Weinger MB, Herndon OW, Gaba DM: The effect
driven and multitasking? Acad Emerg Med 299. Cooper JB, Cullen DJ, Nemeskal R, et al: Effects of electronic record keeping and transesophageal
7:1239-1243, 2000. of information feedback and pulse oximetry on echocardiography on task distribution, workload,
277. Schwid HA, ODonnell D: Educational computer the incidence of anesthesia complications. Anes- and vigilance during cardiac anesthesia. Anesthe-
simulation of malignant hyperthermia. J Clin thesiology 67:686-694, 1987. siology 87:144-155, 1997.
Monit 8:201-208, 1992. 300. Moller JT, Johannessen NW, Espersen K, et al: 322. Weinger MB, Herndon OW, Paulus MP, et al:
278. Cooper J: An analysis of major errors and equip- Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in Objective task analysis and workload assessment
ment failures in anesthesia management: 20,802 patients: II. Perioperative events and post- of anesthesia providers. Anesthesiology 80:77-92,
Considerations for prevention and detection. operative complications. Anesthesiology 78:445- 1994.
Anesthesiology 60:34-42, 1984. 453, 1992. 323. Held J, Krueger H, Landau K: FIT fr die Mensch
279. McIntyre JWR: Ergonomics: Anaesthetists use of 301. Philip JH, Raemer DB: Selecting the optimal
Maschine-Schnittstelle, MenschMaschine-
auditory alarms in the operating room. Int J Clin anesthesia monitoring array. Med Instrum Schnittstellen. Stuttgart, Germany, Institut fuer
Monit Comput 2:47-55, 1985. 19:122-126, 1985. Arbeits-und Organisation Psychologie, 1998, pp
280. Stanford LM, McIntyre JWR, Hogan JT: Audible 302. Weinger MB, Slagle J, Jain S, Ordonez N: Retro- 130-134.
alarm signals for anaesthesia monitoring spective data collection and analytical techniques 324. Kennedy PJ, Feingold A, Wiener EL, Hosek RS:
equipment. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1:251-256, for patient safety studies. J Biomed Inform Analysis of tasks and human factors in anesthesia
1985. 36:106-119, 2003. for coronary artery bypass. Anesth Analg 55:374-
281. Stanford LM, McIntyre JWR, Nelson TM, Hogan 303. Slagle J, Weinger MB, Dinh MT, et al: Assessment 377, 1976.
JT: Affective responses to commercial and experi- of the intrarater and interrater reliability of an 325. Loeb RG: Monitor surveillance and vigilance of
mental auditory alarm signals for anaesthesia established clinical task analysis methodology. anesthesia residents. Anesthesiology 80:527-533,
delivery and physiological monitoring equip- Anesthesiology 96:1129-1139, 2002. 1994.
ment. Int J Clin Monit Comput 5:111-118, 1988. 304. Weinger MB, Vredenburgh AG, Schumann CM, 326. Gurushanthaiah K, Weinger MB, Englund CE:
282. Woods DD: Modeling and Predicting Human
et al: Quantitative description of the workload Visual display format affects the ability of anes-
Error. Boston, Academic Press, 1993, pp associated with airway management procedures. thesiologists to detect acute physiologic changes.
248-274. J Clin Anesth 12:273-282, 2000. A laboratory study employing a clinical display
283. Paris CR, Salas E, CannonBowers JA: Teamwork 305. Weinger MB: Vigilance, boredom, and sleepiness. simulator. Anesthesiology 83:1184-1193, 1995.
in multi-person systems: A review and analysis. J Clin Monit Comput 15:549-552, 1999. 327. Allard J, Dzwonczyk R, Yablock D, et al: Effect of
Ergonomics 43:1052-1075, 2000. 306. Devitt JH, Kurrek MM, Cohen MM, et al: Testing automatic record keeping on vigilance and record
284. Salas EC, Burke CS, Bowers CA, Wilson KA: internal consistency and construct validity during keeping time. Br J Anaesth 74:619-626, 1995.
Team training in the skies: Does crew resource evaluation of performance in a patient simulator. 328. Weinger MB, Herndon OW, Gaba DM: The effect
management (CRM) training work? Hum Factors Anesth Analg 86:1160-1164, 1998. of electronic record keeping and transesophageal
43:641-674, 2001. 307. Gaba DM: Simulators in Anesthesiology. Adv
echocardiography on task distribution, workload,
285. Swezey RW, Owens JM, Bergondy ML, Salas E: Anesth 14:55-94, 1997. and vigilance during cardiac anesthesia. Anesthe-
Task and training requirements analysis method- 308. Gordon JA: The human patient simulator:
siology 87:144-155, 1997.
ology (TTRAM): An analytic methodology for Acceptance and efficacy as a teaching tool for 329. Loeb RG: Manual record keeping is not necessary
identifying potential training uses of simulator students. Acad Med 75:522, 2000. for anesthesia vigilance. J Clin Monit 11:9-13,
networks in teamwork-intensive task environ- 309. Rosenblatt MAR, Abrams KJ, , et al: The use of a 1995.
ments. Ergonomics 41:1678-1697, 1998. human patient simulator in the evaluation of and 330. Gaba DM, Lee T: Measuring the workload of the
286. Cognitive Task Analysis [Special Issue]. Hum
development of a remedial prescription for an anesthesiologist. Anesth Analg 71:354-361, 1990.
Factors 42:1-101, 2000. anesthesiologist with lapsed medical skills. 331. Loeb RG: A measure of intraoperative attention
287. Roizen MF, Foss JF, Fischer SP, Miller RD: Preop- Anesth Analg 94:149-153, 2002. to monitor displays. Anesth Analg 76:337-341,
erative Evaluation. New York, Churchill Living- 310. Byrne AJ, Jones JG: Responses to simulated
1993.
stone, 2000. anaesthetic emergencies by anaesthetists with dif- 332. Manser T, Dieckmann P, Wehner T, Rallf M:

288. Gibby GL, Gravenstein JS, Layon AJ, Jackson KI: ferent durations of clinical experience. Br J Comparison of anaesthetists activity patterns in
How often does the preoperative interview Anaesth 78:553-556, 1997. the operating room and during simulation. Ergo-
change anesthetic management? [abstract]. Anes- 311. Byrne AJ, Greaves JD: Assessment instruments nomics 50:246-260, 2007.
thesiology 77:A1134, 1992. used during anaesthetic simulation: Review of 333. Toung TJK, Donham RT, Rogers MC: Effect of
289. Buffington CW, Ramanathan S, Turndorf H:
published studies. Br J Anaesth 86:445-450, 2001. previous medical training on the stress of giving
Detection of anesthesia machine faults. Anesth 312. Forrest FC, Taylor MA, Postlethwaite K, Aspinall anesthesia [abstract]. Anesthesiology 65:A473,
Analg 63:79-82, 1984. R: Use of a high-fidelity simulator to develop 1986.
290. Anesthesia apparatus checkout recommenda-
testing of the technical performance of novice 334. Azar I, Sophie S, Lear E: The cardiovascular
A tions. Fed Reg 52:36-37, 1987.
291. March MG, Crowley JJ: An evaluation of anesthe-
anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 88:338-344, 2002.
313. Gaba DM, Howard SK: Simulated anaesthetic

response of anesthesiologists during induction of
anesthesia [abstract]. Anesthesiology 63:A76, 1985.
165 6
335. Bitetti J, Hartwell P, Chin ML, et al: Stress in the analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Inten- complexity in emergency medical care and its
attending anesthesiologist [abstract]. Anesthesi- sive Care 21:543-550, 1993. implications for team coordination. LOTAS
ology 73: 1990. 350. Morris RW, Montano SR: Response times to
Group. Level One Trauma Anesthesia Simulation.
336. Harrison TK, Manser T, Howard SK, Gaba DM: visual and auditory alarms during anaesthesia. Hum Factors 38:636-645, 1996.
Use of cognitive aids in a simulated anesthetic Anaesth Intensive Care 24:682-684, 1996. 361. Mackenzie CF, Xiao Y, Jaberi M, et al: Strengths
crisis. Anesth Analg 103:551-556, 2006. 351. Craven RM, McIndoe AK: Continuous auditory and weaknesses of airway teleconsultation. J Clin
337. Buerschaper C, Harms H, Hofinger G, Rall M: monitoringhow much information do we reg- Monitor 14:526-527, 1998.
Problemlsefhigkeiten in der Ansthesie. Forum ister? Br J Anaesth 83:747-749, 1999. 362. Xiao Y, MacKenzie C, Orasanu J, et al: Informa-
Qualitative Sozialforschung [Forum: Qualitative 352. Botney R, Gaba DM, Howard SK, Jump B: The tion acquisition from audio-video-data sources:
Social Research] [On-line Journal]. 4, 2003. role of fixation error in preventing the detection
An experimental study on remote diagnosis. The
338. Mackie RR: Vigilance researchare we ready for and correction of a simulated volatile anesthetic
LOTAS Group. Telemed J 5:139-155, 1999.
countermeasures? Hum Factors 29:707-723, 1987. overdose [abstract]. Anesthesiology 79:A1115,
363. Mackenzie CF, Hu PF, Horst RL: An audio-video
339. Adams JA: Criticisms of vigilance research: A 1993.
system for automated data acquisition in the
discussion. Hum Factors 29:737-740, 1987. 353. Schwid HA, Rooke GA, Michalowski P, Ross BK:
clinical environment. LOTAS Group. J Clin
340. Beatty J, Ahern SK, Katz R, Mackie RR: Sleep Screen-based anesthesia simulation with debriefing
Deprivation and the Vigilance of Anesthesiolo- improves performance in a mannequin-based anes- Monit 11:335-341, 1995.
gists during Simulated Surgery. New York, thesia simulator. Teach Learn Med 13:92-96, 2001. 364. Phipps D, Meakin GH, Beatty PC, et al: Human
Plenum, 1977. 354. Schwid HA, Rooke GA, Ross BK, Sivarajan M: factors in anaesthetic practice: Insights from a
341. Denisco RA, Drummond JN, Gravenstein JS: The Use of a computerized advanced cardiac life task analysis. Br J Anaesth 100:333-343, 2008.
effect of fatigue on the performance of a simu- support simulator improves retention of advanced 365. Sanderson PM, Watson MO, Russell WJ, et al:

I
lated anesthetic monitoring task. J Clin Monit cardiac life support guidelines better than a text- Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted
3:22-24, 1987. book review. Crit Care Med 27:821-824, 1999. displays: Advantages and disadvantages for moni-
342. Kay J, Neal M: Effect of automatic blood pressure 355. Reznek M, SmithCoggins R, Howard S, et al: toring by the distracted anesthesiologist. Anesth
devices on vigilance of anesthesia residents. J Clin Emergency Medicine Crisis Resource Manage- Analg 106:1787-1797, 2008.
Monit 2:148-150, 1986. ment (EMCRM): Pilot study of a simulation- 366. Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN, et al: Observa-
343. Cooper JO, Cullen BF: Observer reliability in
based crisis management course for emergency tional teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS):
detecting surreptitious random occlusions of the medicine. Acad Emerg Med 10:386-389, 2003. Refinement and application in urological surgery.
monaural esophageal stethoscope. J Clin Monit 356. Gaba DM: Two examples of how to evaluate the World J Surg 31:1373-1381, 2007.
6:271-275, 1990. impact of new approaches to teaching [editorial]. 367. Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, et al: Markers
344. Patel VL, Groen GJ, Frederiksen CH: Differences Anesthesiology 96:1-2, 2002. for enhancing team cognition in complex
between medical students and doctors in memory 357. Weinger MB, Vora S, Herndon CN, Howard SK, environments: The power of team performance
for clinical cases. Med Educ 20:3-9, 1986. Smith BE, Mazzei WJ, et al: Evaluation of the diagnosis. Aviat Space Environ Med 78:B77-B85,
345. Patel VL, Evans DA, Kaufman DR: Reasoning effects of fatigue and sleepiness on clinical perfor-
2007.
strategies and the use of biomedical knowledge mance of on-call anesthesia residents during
368. Friedman Z, Katznelson R, Devito I, et al: Objec-
by medical students. Med Educ 24:129-136, 1990. actual nighttime cases and in simulated cases. In:
tive assessment of manual skills and proficiency
346. Patel VL, Groen GJ, Arocha JF: Medical expertise Proc Enhanc Patient Safety Reduc Errors Health
in performing epidural anesthesiavideo-
as a function of task difficulty. Mem Cognit Care; 1999; Rancho Mirage, CA: National Patient
assisted validation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 31:304-
18:394-406, 1990. Safety Foundation, 1999, p. 306-310.
347. Gaba DM, DeAnda A: The response of anesthesia 358. Mackenzie CF, Hu PF, Horst RL: An audio-video 310, 2006.
trainees to simulated critical incidents. Anesth system for automated data acquisition in the 369. Guerlain S, Adams RB, Turrentine FB, et al:

Analg 68:444-451, 1989. clinical environment. LOTAS Group. J Clin Assessing team performance in the operating
348. Loeb RG, Fitch WT: A laboratory evaluation of an Monit 11:335-341, 1995. room: Development and use of a black-box
auditory display designed to enhance intraopera- 359. Mackenzie CF, Martin P, Xiao Y: Video analysis recorder and other tools for the intraoperative
tive monitoring. Anesth Analg 94:362-368, 2002. of prolonged uncorrected esophageal intubation. environment. J Am Coll Surg 200:29-37, 2005.
349. Runciman WB, Webb RK, Barker L, Currie M: Level One Trauma Anesthesia Simulation Group. 370. Weinger MB, Gonzales DC, Slagle J, Syeed M:
The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. The Anesthesiology 84:1494-1503, 1996. Video capture of clinical care to enhance patient
pulse oximeter: Applications and limitationsan 360. Xiao Y, Hunter WA, Mackenzie CF, et al: Task safety. Qual Saf Health Care 13:136-144, 2004.

:
,
WHO Draft Guidelines for Adverse Event Reporting and
http://www.npsf.org/ Learning SystemsFrom Information to Action als pdf
www.patientsafety.gov (VA) www.who.int/patientsafety/events/05/Reporting_Guidelines.
http://www.jcaho.org/ pdf
www.npsa.nhs.uk
http://anesthesia.stanford.edu/VASimulator
www.medizin.uni-tuebingen.de/psz http://www.psrs.arc.nasa.gov
U.S. Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act
www.npsa.nhs.uk/health/reporting USA http://www.pso.ahrq.gov/psos/overview.htm
www.pasis.de
www.pasos-ains.de www.va.gov/ncps/rca.html. 2005.
www.cirrnet.ch www.npsa.nhs.uk/health/resources/root_cause_analysis/
www.cirsmedical.org
http://psrs.arc.nasa.gov/ www.va.gov/ncps/HFMEA.html. 2005.
Pronovosts ICUSRS75 A
I 166

A
Marcus Rall, David M. Gaba, Peter Dieckmann Christoph Eich
..
..


1. 5.
, ,
, . (,
, , ,
. ,
2. . ).
6.
-.
, ,

. ()
3. (,
-).
, 7.

. .
8. (
)
, (1) ,
.

(2) ;
,
, [ANTS]
. .
4. 9.
, ,
, (
( ), ),
. .

(ACRM) ACRM- ,
(. . 6 ) .
-
10.

. , ,

,
.
.
,
,
.

.
, ?
.
, -- ,
? , -

167
I 168

. , ,
.. , , - . 1930 .
, . .
-
; -
- , . 1950 . -
. ,
- ,
, . -
1960-, -
. , .
, - ,
, -
. ,
, - -
. - .
,
. .
,
. -
,
,
. , ,
, . Good
Gravenstein1 , -
, . . 7-1
-
. . -
,
. (, ,
- , . . 6), -
, , -
. .
, - , -
- . -
. ,
.2-4




1910 1927 .,

-
. 7-1 12 ,
(. 7-1)5.

,
CRM.
-
. .
. ( 412 512 4
48 ). , -
. ;
.
.
, (,
,
).
( ,
(, , )
, , GuardianAngel-System). .
,
.
1:
() /
.

CRM risis resource management ( -


) ,
A : Singleton WT: The Mind at Work. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,
1989
. -
169 7

1.


(
)
2.



3.

I
-

4. ,

, (, ,
( ,
) ( ) (, ,
)
)

5. ,

,
,
(
, , ,

)
6. ,


( , :
() (, ( ,
) ) )

7.


,
8.

. - .

() , .


9.

.

in
. , situ,
,

. 7-1 12 (10 12 ).
( ).
CRM- . CRM
; ED ; ICU , OR . *

A
I 170

10.

,
,
in
situ,
-, .


11. ,


.
,
,
,

12. ,




, ,


. 7-1

,
, . - ) -
, , -
. ,
.
-
, (
) 2:
.6,7
-
; ,
-
, - .
.8-10 -
. -
( ,
)
( , , ,
, ,11 - :
-
12). ( -
- [CRM];
- ; -
, CRM .
; , . 6).14,18 CRM , -
, -
.
- .15 ,
, - , ,
. -, (
- ),
, - ( ).16
13.
, (-
A ( ) -
171 7
,
.21 - 5:

.
-
(, - , . -
[ICU]), - ,
. - , -
. -
, - .
(- , ,
, )22 , .
( ). -
, -

3: .

I

6: , ,
,
-
.

, , ,

; - -
, - . -
.
- - , -
, , -
, , ,
. . -
- .
(), -
, - (, ),
, -
. - (, -
(- ).
, )
17,18 . -
, -
.
.

4: , ; , -
, ,
-
-
.
. -
- ,
,11,20-22 ,23,24 - , .
25,26 , ,
. -
-
, - ,
, ,27,28 ,
29,30 31-34. .
,
, , -
, .
-
.35 , . ,
- , , -
, , -
, , , , -
. .36-38 A
I 172

, .
-
. -
. -

7: ,

-
, -

, . ( ). -
-
, . -
-
, .40,41 -
- , .
-. -
, , -
.
.
,
8: -
.
(,
)
, .
( -
). (- , -
, ), , ,
-- (. 10). -
41-43 , - ,
, -
. , ( .
, - , ).
.

10:
.
, -
.44
, --
(, , - -
) -
,
(, . -
), - .
( ,
, - . -
),
, - , .
. - -
, , ,
. .45
, ..,
-
9: -
,
.

,
, -- 11: ,
,
-
. , , -
, ,
A , , - -
173 7
. (
- U2) , .20
. -
- , -
,46 - ,
, ,
.47,48 . , -
. ,
, - , -
, - .
.


, .
, - -
. - , , -

I
, , (
- ),
, ( -
- . ) .
- , -
, .
- () (-
, . , ).

(, -)
12: , . -
, (. ) -
,

(, , -
, - ).
/ - ,
.19 , (, -
).21,22
- .
. -
( )
,
-
. , -
,

, ,
. .
: ( -
),
( -
), -
( ,
) -
23 (
, , );
, - , (
. - ), -
( , -
, , ),
, (
, .
)
( -

, ).24,25
,
. , -
- , , A
I 174

-
. - ,
, , -
. .
-
, - , -
.26 .
2007 . , -
, ,
.21

Laucken.21 Laucken ,
, - -
; - ;
, , .23,28,29
.27 , -

. -
, -
- ,
(, , . -
, ). , ,
, .
-
. -
, ,
, .
: , ,
, . -
, - (, )
; , -
. - -
, . .
, ,
, ,
, .
-
- , ,
.24
, - .
, - -
( , -
). ,
- .
, , ;
, -
.
,
,
. - ( ),
- , , -
: X Y .
, Z, .
B, - , .
. - 7-2.
,
. (SI): -
, , -
, - - ,
. .
-
. - .
, (SB) :

A . , -
175 7

-
-

SI SB T C S D E

. 7-2 . (, ,
, , ).
. , , , -
( ). , , , , -
, ,
, . ( .)

I
. ,
, , (
, , , -
(, - ) . (
), . ).
(, , (): -
,
, .
).
, , -
, -

(, - .
).
(): - , -
.
. (,
: - )
-. - . -
,
. -
, - , .

.
(B): (, -

[ACRM])
, .

. 20 -
(): - . -
.
. ; . 7-2 -
; - .
.
(S): . -
, , -
, - ,
, ,
. , - ,
- -
, , , .
, -
,
.
(D):
-
. - , , - A
I 176

, 7-9). -
, ,
(, , -
, , ). , -
. - (,
-
).




-
; -
. - ,

, .
, ;
. - ,
, , , -
, . ,
(. 7-3 .

. 7-2

,
,
,

,




.
;

,
;



;

.
;


,

,
(, ,
)
( )


A
177 7

I
. 7-3 , -
. ,
, - -
.
,
. ,
. --

,
CRM. CRM
. ( TuPASS, , -
, .)

:
. 7-5 ,
.
. -
, , -
(
( ) - ). , -
- . (,
)
, . CRM (,
- ). CRM . (-
, TuPASS, ,
, - .)
.
-
-
,

. 7-4 , -
. , - . 7-6 , -
( ). . -
, ,
CRM - -
, , - . (
. CRM . (
TuPASS, , , .)
TuPASS /
TuPASS, Airmed 2008 .)
A
I 178

. 7-8 , -
()/ -
.
, -
. , CRM,
, -
.
-
. -
(. ). (
TuPASS.)

, -
-
.
, , ,
B , -
-
. 7-7 , , -
. . , ,
( ) ,
, .
- (, , ). B,
-
;
,
.
CRM -
( ),

. CRM . (, -
TuPASS CRM- SouthTyrolian White Cross -
, . B, TuPASS,
.)

.
,
,

(, ).

. 7-9 , , -
CRM, -
. 7-2. , .
, : . -
, ( 42- ,
). -
. -

. ,
-
. , CRM (. -
. ). ( TuPASS,
A .

, , .)
179 7
,
, -
. ,
, , (, -
. - ) ,
,
- .
: , -
, . . -
- , ,
, -
.
, (, , -
, , , , -
, ).
. -

I
- , ,
, ,
. - .
, -
. ,
.
. - .
: -

, , -
-
, .
( , -
,
). - , -
, , ,
, . ,
. -
,
-
.
,
,
.
,
,
, ,
. .
.
-
, (
).
-
, - ,
. ,
(, , -
( , - , ).
) -
.
, - -
( , , ( ,
) (- , , /)
) . ( -
- ,
,30-35 - - ).32,36-46
. ,
. 6 (, -
, , . -
, ,
35 ). , - A
I 180

, -
.
, -
, - -
( D. Gaba .48,49
, ,
, ). (. . 8).50 -
CRM- -
.
(. 7-3).
,
-
,

.
,
- ,
; - -
, .
.
, - ,
. ,
D. Gaba . . , ,
CRM- - , -
.16,95
- (. ).
. ,
.




- , -
(), - : -
, ,
, , - ; -
.47 .
- , .
,
. - .47,48,50-54 -
. - -
;
(, : , -
). , -

. 7-3

: : /

CRM

, , () .

() ,

, ,

, ,

CRM-

, () ,
A CRM
181 7
, . . 7-10
.
,
. 7-4. -
.
:

, ().

. ,

.

,
-
. 7-10 - , .

I
, CRM.
.
,
, , .
- (-
). , ,


. -
. , , -
CRM . ( B. .
Schaedle, TuPASS, PaedSim, , -
, .) .

-

. 7-4 : , CRM-

.
. ,

,
. .
: ,

, .
, (,
)

( ).
(, ).

, -, , ,
, ,
-. , ,
.

CRM.

,
, .

, : ,

, ,
.

CRM
A
I 182

. - , .
-
- -
(. . 2, 4, 5 99). (IMSH SSIH, SESAM);
-
, . (.
, - , .)
.
-
. , -
(
, - -
). ,
,
.
(, CRM, , (. . 6). ,
CRM 10 11 . 7-8). - --
- , ,
, ,
. -
. , ,
. , - , ,
, . , .
. .
.
, , , ,

. (, ,
, , , ).
-
.




,

. -
- , :
. , -
, , ,
, - , ,
.
.41,50,55-58
. -

-
-
/ .
-
- , -
( , -
, , - - ).
, . ,
- .
, , , , - -
- .
. , -
, -
.
.
-
-
59
.3,60 -
A - . . 7-11
183 7

TuPASS
P. Dieckmann & M. Rall, TuPASS, Germany

CRM

CRM

I
,

. 7-11 TuPASS. TuPASS;


.
. . - TuPASS (www.tupass.de/
scenarioscript.html). ( . . , TuPASS, .)

, TuPASS .
. , -
(www.tupass.de/ , ,
scenarioscript.html).
, (http:// ,
simcenter.duhs.duke.edu/SimTemplate1203.doc). - CRM, .
- , ,
, ,
. . ,
-
; - , ,
(ASA) .10 -
, , -
ASA.
.
,
,
60a: (1) ( -
) ( -
- ), (2) (), (3)
. - ( , -
, . ) (4) -
, (
) (. 7-12). A
I 184


.
. (David M. Gaba) -
: CRM-
VA- -
.
,
. . -
- CRM-
. . (Marcus Rall,
- Peter Dieckmann) ,
, (, 1000 .
)
(
, - 2 6 ); -
. -
- (SSIH,
, - SESAM). -
, ,
.
; - , .
. , -
- -
CRM , (.,
, , SSH IMSH SESAM);
,
. , ,
CRM-
. 7-5
.
.
(Marcus Rall) -
, IMSH 2006 .
InFacT-
(www.tupass.de/downloads/InFacT.html).

. 7-5 CRM-
*
-
,
,


(. . 7-2)
/
,
(-)

,

,

CRM

,
. 7-12 -
.
. .


. - ,
,
, ,
( -
). , - , ,

. (.
A . , : Colb DA:. Experimental learning: Experience as the source
of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall, 1984.)
*
.
185 7
.
, -
, . ,
. .
-
, -
.
( -
-) , .
. -
.
? , - -
CRM, , , ,
. - , -
. -
; - ,

I
(, ResusSim), -
. ,

(, , ),
.
- (, Gasman).
, -
,
, . ASA 2008 . ,
( - (, , -
) - , ),
, :
(CME)
ASA. 1. , -
, - - (
: , -
: , , - , , -
. ).
,
. - ( -
(
ASA)
, ), ,
-
. (
, , - , -
, ).
- 2. : -
. - ( -
CRM- ).
, 3. , -
, .
. , , -
, -
. -
- -
, , . ,
, -
. .


-
(. 7-13).19
, -
, .
. -
- .
.19 Cumin Merry61 - - A
I 186

- . -
,
, ( ) -
. - . ,
.
-
. - - -
,
. ,
-
. .
- ,
. -
, .
. . 7-6 - -

.
, (, ),
- , -
, - .62-64
, -
. / ,
- -
,
, -
, . . -
, /
, - /
. . /
-
, , -
,
. -
. ,
.
. , ,
- ,
. ,
,
, - - .

. /

, .
,
.

. 7-13 . -
/ . , -
.
; , . -
A ,
. ; . ( .. , .)
187 7
. 7-6 -

.
, , , , , ,
, ,
, ,




( )

,

, ( ,
)

;
.







,

(
) ( 2008 .)
, ,






,

( )
( Spo2
( );
) , PAP,


CO2 (, 2 )
(
)


( / )
..
(
)
( 2 , )

(
)

: , .
.
; ; ; ; PAP
;
A
I 188

. 7-7
, . 7-7.
- ,
. -
,
(,
. )
- ,
- , ,
, ,
, ,
(

)
.28



,
,
(- (, BIS, AEP, PSI)
) , -

.65

( , -
), , , , -
(
). : ,
( 2008).
, , , .
. ,
- .
/ AEP ; BIS ;
; PSI
. ,
,
,
: , :
, ( -
/ , -
);65 -
. Holodeck Star Trek ,
. (, , ).
- ,
-, - , -
, , ,
; ,
- .
.
- - -
, -
(, ,
. ).
- , -
( ,
, -
) / .
. ,
-
( . -
), - , ,
- , .
. , -
- .
/ , , - -
, -
, - ,
, - -
-
A , . - .
189 7

. , - .
, - ,
, -
( .
[ ]). 1960- , -
-
- , - (Sim One).
( ),
- .71 Sim One -
. - ; - ,

. ,
(- ,
World of Warcraft .
9 000 000 ), - 1980- -

I
- (, Second Life, .
, ,
, ). Sim One.
.
, - ( --
) ()
- ( - .
-). - (, ,
, ) , -
, , , - , -
. -
,
- . , -
- - (,
,
), , -
, , -
. ,
, . -
, , ,
, -
, . .

, ,
, - (.
. , . 6).72-75

. 15 (David M.
Gaba) , 2020 .,

.66,67
-
()
1980- .,
-.
, :
-
, --
, , ( Gasman
, ). -
-
. .

, -
. -
, . -
-, ,

.5,68-70 - . -
- , - A
I 190


, -
. ( BEME, Issenberg25)
, .
, .
- -
, - .
.
.




-
- ,
( -
- -
; (Issenberg .25)
), , (1) -
. - , (2) -
, ( - , ,
),
. 70% , ,
, -. Coates .78, Gordon
15% .79 , -
. - -
, --
- .
. -
,54,77,80-90 :
20 , -
. -
- ;
, , -
( .91
). - (.. -
) -
. 6. ;
--

.

-
.
- - ;
-

. .
. Morgan Cleave-Hogg76 , Morgan Cleave-Hogg92
-
.
.
,
- .77
, -
.
- ;
; -, ,
, , ,
.77 ,
Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME , www. -
bemecollaboration.org ) Issenberg .25 , . ,
- -
, - -
A , :
191 7
,
.
,
,
, -
.
, , -
, ;
CRM--
. CRM VA-
ACRM-95;
. -
, ACRM
, ,
, -
. 7-14 - , , -

I
, . ,
( ) -
( ).
.16,35,38,41,43,44,54,68,96-113 . 7-14
, (Hot Seat) , ACRM .
. (), - ACRM, -
. ( , 40%
TuPASS, , -
-
, , .)
, , , 60%

- ;
. .
ACRM . 7-8.
Hodges ACRM,
, -

( ).93 , (. CRM . 6).
- ACRM (VA--
, , CMS, , )
, ,
. , - , ACRM -
, ACRM. . 7-9 -
- .
, http://anesthesia.stanford.edu/VASimulator/
ACRM_Criteria.htm.
; - ,
- -
. , ACRM. ,
ACRM- -
, -
. , - ,
, -
, Hodges. .

. 7-8

1.
2.
3.
1989 ., . 6 4.
5. (10 10 )
Cooper .,72,94 Howard .,95 Gaba73,74 - 6.
VA - 7.
, 8.
9.
-
10. ( -
; )
. 11.
: (1) 12. ( 10 10- )
; (2) 13.
- 14.
; (3) 15.
: , , CRM . 6
A
I 192

. 7-9 , ).

ACRM
,
,
, ,
, .
/,
83 ,
.
. -
, ; -
, , ,
.

.
, . -
CRM.
.
,
-
(
)
-

, , .
, , -
, -
,
, -
( ,
. ), . -
,
, -
: ,
, ,
, .

( 4 , 8 ) (.
).


ACRM-.95,109 -
ACRM-
50% , ,
( ), . . 7-10
(
-
. 6)

.
VA- ACRM -
, -
(ACRM 1, 2, 3).

. ,
. -
, , , , -
,
CRM , -
-


.
( ) /


, ACRM- ACRM- , -
( -
, ( ).
). ACRM-
- (3-
- ), (2- ) -
(4- )
,
. (, ). -
ACRM- ,
: -
.114-116 Salas .33 -

A ( CRM.
193 7
. 7-10 (ACRM)

(n = 30) (n = 34)


(%) ACRM (%) (%) ACRM (%)

1 13 3 9 1
2 10 3 6 2
3 15 15 11 4
4 10 25 28 28
5 33 54 46 75

, Holzman RS, Cooper JB, Gaba DM, et al: Anesthesia crisis resource management: Real-life simulation training in operating room crises. J Clin Anesth 7:675-
687, 1995

I
, ,
-
,
, (-
- ) -
-- (
. : )
, -
( - (. 7-15 7-16). Eppich .35
), -
,
, - ,
, .
ACRM. - -
-
-
, , .
, .
-

. Hayes
.,117 -
,
, 49% -
, 50% , -

,
.
.



(. . 82).43,111,118 Overly .119, -
-
,
.
,

,
.
-


; - . 7-15 . -
- () ,
.
.
( . Eich, , , .)
A
I 194

,
, --
.64,116,125-129 Jacobsen .130 -
42 -
-
ACRM, -
, Gaba Howard.69,131
,
. , -
,
.
, -

-
.
CME- ,
. 7-16 CRM -
. -
,
, -
. ( - .
) , - 1 ,
, . ,
. CRM - , .
. ( .)
CME
- . -
.120-122
, - , .
CME, , -
;
, - .
, - ASA -
, . ASA (, -
(. 7-11).123 - ) ,

. ASA CME. 2008 .
, - , -
, .
, , -
-
,
.120 ,
- CME- -
- (Cooper J.: Per-
.123 , sonal communication, 2005).
- -
(, .
),
, , , -
.
. , ,
,
. . 7-11
, -
.124


,
,
(-
.
, ).118

,


- ( )
(CME) - ,
; CRM
(-
). :
A - CRM
195 7






, , -

. -
,

( , ), -
,
. ACRM- -

I
,113,132 -
, . 7-18
133-138, , , - .
( -
( -
), (. 7-16),139,140 - , , ).
, , ( ,
. - , .)
,
. Knudson .36
(. 7-18 7-19) (. . 74).
, , -
ACRM- (-,
. - -
) -
.59-60
- , -
, 144.
. 7-17 ,
- . (,
100 . ).
-
, -
, ,
.
()

,

( ).
: (1) , -
- ,

. 7-17 - . 10 . 7-19
SimMan. . .
. -

( -
, , .)
A
I 196

, , (2) - . 7-12 ,
, -
,
(. . 6)
,
(. . 6).
. 7-12
. ?

,
,
?
. , -
?
. , -
, ?
.
. - ?
- -
, ,
. ?

, ,

,
?
, .

?
, , .



() . ?
,
, -?
-

?
.
-
2007 .
- ( ,
-
( , David M. Gaba, ) ?
). , - ?
, - ,
?
-
.
-
, , ,

,
, , - ?
, -
.
--
,
?
-
:
.19,21,22,26,27,145,146

.104 ,
. ,
( )?

? (,
; )
?

,
?

?

. -
A (
197 7
, , ) - -
, . 3500 ,
. 458
, , -
, , - , , -
, .148
. :
. , -
- ,
( , )
. , . Flanagan .148
- , , -
. , ,
- . BEME Issenberg25, -
, ,
, -

I

(WB Murray: personal communication, 1998). , 3 6, , -
2 .
, , -
, -
. , .
- .
-
.
; ,
- . -
. 149:
( , -
) .
,
,
. , ,
,
.
-
(
).
-

- .
. - , -
, , -
, -
. .
- -
. -
,
.
.
- 147. ,
,
, .

- ,
, ,
.
, .
.


, -
- -
.
Flanagan .148 - , -
, A
I 198

. -
. - - ,
, . , -
:
. . ,
.
, - . -
, -
. , -
. . -
, : .
,
25. ,
, , ,
- .
, , :
.
, , -
. - , -
Sim One 7, - .
, . ,
, - ?
, - , -
, , ,
. :
,
.
, -
.150 -
?
, , ,
. ,
, - .
, -
. , - , , ,
1, ,
, -
, . ,
. -
, . ,
.151 . ,
, -
- , .
, - , -
.152 , ,
, . -
. - ,
- .
,107,140,153-172 ,
- :
(. ( ..)
).152 , . -
, -
37,38,43,46,173-177,
, -
.
,
.

, ,
, .

- -
. , , - ,

A , , , . -
199 7
(.. , -
- , -
. , ),178
- .145 -
(-
. ),
, - , , -
,
( 75% - . -
, (41 5
, - , ,
). )
.179
( . 6. 6
), , , , ,
,

I
. , -
- ( -
CRM- ).
, (. 7-20). -
- ,
. .

:
, , . -
, .
, - (, ,
, , - ). -
; ,
CRM-. -
126,127,159,161,180-182.
-
-
. ,
-

- .
, -
(,

, 0% , 0%


, 3% , 0% , 2%
, 8%

9%
11%


16%
26%


29%
25%

38%
33%

. 7-20 .
, , -.
. , . ( T. Manser, ETH
Zurich, and University Hospital, Tubingen, Germany.)
A
I 200

, - . -
; Manser Rall). - , -
. ,
.47,183 -
-

. -

-
.
,

.*
* : 11, 32, 36, 40, 44, 60, 119, 127, 162, 173, 176,
190-215
(. . 6). -
. -

( -


) ( -
, ,
)184,185 (. . 6 CRM). - ,
, ,
, - -
.151,152,160,161,186-189 - . -
- , ,
. -
, , :

.
(CRM). , -
- ( )
, -
, , (CRM). -
-
( ) . ,
. - ,
- .
.
( ) ,
. -
, ( -
. ) ?
- ,
, - ,
?
, -
. -
, .
, -
- , , -
. - .
. , ?
, , -
. ?

, ?
. . -
- ,
. , , ?
Gaba .185 -
(, - . -
),
- (ANTS).162,233
A . , ,
201 7
- -
?
. ( ,
, ? ,
),
.224
( , XXI. -
)? . -
-
, , -
, -
? -
-
, . .

, ,

I
, -
, ,
, , -

, ?
.
,
. ?

. ,
-
. -
( ) ,
.127,151,159-161,180,185,216 Gaba . 185 .
, , -
, -
. - - -
, .
.
( ANTS) , .
, .
217,218 - .
, -
, , ,
. , -
, ,
, , .

. , -
-
.
, .
219, , -
, - , -
- .
.220 , ,
Klemola Norros221
, ,
. -
(, - . -
, ) , -
(, -
, ).
, , .
- ,
. ,
. , -
Greaves Grant222 -- . -
,
. Epstein Hundert223 -
. , - A
I 202

10,4


18

18
7,5

.
15

31

23

. 7-21 VA- .

. ; ;


. (2 4
) David M. Gaba
- Marcus Rall . 7-23 -
.37,38,96,173,175,197,225,226 - . ,
,
/ . -
- . ,
- .
, - ,
. - ,
. ,
. . . 7-24 -
- -
. TuPASS,
(Marcus Rall) ,
.
. , 2008. ,
-
. .
-
, -
-,
, ,
/ , -
. -

- . -
-, -
A . . 7-21 7-22 ,
203 7

/ . .
2 1



1 1,2
/PACG
(
4)

I

2

.



.
3

. 7-22 ,
, - (,
). ( E. Stricker, : TuPASS
Center for Patient Safety and Simulation, Tbingen, Germany.)

7 1 7
7
3 8 15 15
12 13 13
4 6
1
4
14

16
13
11

4
7
1
9 10
2 13 17
2
2 2 5
7
18

1 1 7 12 15
2 3 8 13 (. )
9 14 - 16
4 / 10 17 .
11 18 .
5 ()
6

. 7-23 ( , ).
/ (), .
, .
, . -
, . (: Decker K, Rall M:
Simulation in anaesthesia: A step towards improved patient safety. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 9:325-332, 2000.)
A
I 204

.
-
,
.
:
, -,
-, -
, -, -
, .

.

-
-
: .
. 7-24 .
. - :
,
. $25 000
. CRM- , - , $150000; .
- -
. . . Cumin Merry61

. ( TuPASS Center for Patient
.
Safety and Simulation, Tubingen, Germany.) (-
$150 000)227 . -
-
. - : -
,
. . 7-25 .
, , ,
(David M. Gaba) -
, . -
(2008 .). ;
- .
(. - --
).
, , . ,
. ,
.
-
. . -
. -

. ,
, . ,
, . ( -
, ) -
- .
(
) - . , -
( -
, , ,
), (, ,
) . -
, . -
.
( ), , ,
- :
. , , . -
-, ,
, .
, -
-
, . -
?
, -
A , : - (-
205 7

/ (3) .
3

.
4

.
1



.
2

I
(2)

. 7-25 -
,

(, ) -
-
. ( D. M. Gaba, : Center for Immersive and
Simulation-based Learning at Stanford Medical School. Ground
floor built as of June 2008.)
( , ,
,
, ..)
(2)

(3)

(2)


(1/3)



(2/3)

/

,


(3/3)

, ). (
, - , -
. - ), ,
,
,
, , , .
,
(
), ,
-
. ,

, ,
-
. , -
, ,
, ,
. - ,228 -
,
. . . 7-13 A
I 206

- . - ,
. -
. -
- .
, - -
-
. . -22*.
, -
, -
- ,
. , -
, , , .
. , , ,
, , , --
, - .
,
.
, CRM-

.
:
Helmreich Foushee, CRM-, :
,
CRM- -

, -
,
.229 , -
United Airlines -
CRM: // -
( CRM) , . -
. ,
- --
. ,
: , - ,
,
.230 . ,
, , -
, - .
.
, .
. 7-13
(SSH; www.ssih.org),
http://www.ssih.org 2004 . , -

, , -
. Journal Simulation . SSH-
in Healthcare, Elsevier Annual IMSH Meeting
http://www.hmc.psu.edu/simulation/ (IMSH), -
Penn State Medical Center, , ,
( )
.
www.sesam.ws
SESAM (Society in Europe for Simulation Applied
1990- (The Rochester
to Medicine) Conferences on Simulation in Anesthesia).
http://www.simulation-users.fsnet.co.uk/ 100 , SESAM
-, - 400 . The IMSH 2009 -
2000 .
, , -
http://web.anes.rochester.edu/simulate/simusers.htm ,
http://web.anes.rochester.edu/simulate/webpages.htm
University of Rochester Medical Center, , ASA

- ,
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/Depts/BMSC/europe.htm
Bristol Simulation Center, -
(IARS).
-
http://anesthesia.stanford.edu/VASimulator/simulator.htm 2006 .
VAPalo Alto HCS/Stanford University (D. Gaba) . (2008)
http://www.tupass.de
A Center for Patient Safety and Simulation, University of Tubingen (M. Rall)
* . . 106 . 6. (. . . .)
207 7
PubMed, ,
,
, .
SESAM (www.sesam.ws), - -
Association of Standardized , -
Patient Educaters. SSH.
- . (wind
- tunnel),
, .
, , - , -
. .
AIMS , .
. - -
, AIMS - - .
,
() . , , -

I
, -
, Second Life.

, , ,
. .
-
, -
- ; ,

. -
, -
.231 .
, HoloDeck .
.5,16,232 - , -
, - 2020 ., -
, - ,
- . , ,
,
, - .
. -
-
.
- , , -
. .
- CRM
, ACRM-,
. , -
, -
, . -

,
. - . .,
- , , -
, ,
, . .


1. Good ML, Gravenstein JS: Anesthesia simulators assessment of clinical competence of graduates of 10. Meier AH, Rawn CL, Krummel TM: Virtual
and training devices. Int Anesth Clin 27:161-166, foreign medical schools. Educational Commis- reality: Surgical applicationchallenge for the
1989. sion for Foreign Medical Graduates. JAMA new millennium. J Am Coll Surg 192:372-384,
2. Gallagher CJ, Issenberg SB: Simulation in Anes- 270:1041-1045, 1993. 2001.
thesia. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2006. 7. Ziv A, BenDavid MF, Sutnick AI, Gary NE: 11. Howard SK, Gaba DM, Smith BE, et al: Simula-
3. Kyle RR, Murray WB: Clinical Simulation Lessons learned from six years of international tion study of rested versus sleep-deprived anes-
Operations, Engineering and Management. administrations of the ECFMGs SP-based clinical thesiologists. Anesthesiology 98:1345-1355, 2003.
Amsterdam, Academic Press Elsevier, 2008. skills assessment. Acad Med 73:84-91, 1998. 12. Agutter J, Drews F, Syroid N, et al: Evaluation
4. Smith BE, Gaba DM, Lake C, et al: Simulators. 8. Stefanich L, CruzNeira C: A virtual surgical of graphic cardiovascular display in a high-
Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2001. simulator for the lower limbs. Biomed Sci Instrum fidelity simulator. Anesth Analg 97:1403-1413,
5. Gaba DM: The future vision of simulation in 35:141-145, 1999. 2003.
health care. Qual Saf Health Care 13(Suppl 1):i2- 9. Krummel TM: Surgical simulation and virtual 13. Singer SJ, Gaba DM, Geppert JJ, et al: The culture
i10, 2004. reality: The coming revolution. Ann Surg of safety: Results of an organization-wide survey
6. Sutnick AI, Stillman PL, Norcini JJ, et al: ECFMG 228:635-637, 1998. in 15 California hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care A
I 208

12:112-118, 2003. 35. Eppich WJ, Adler MD, McGaghie WC: Emer- 2001.
14. Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA: The evo- gency and critical care pediatrics: Use of medical 55. Makary MA, Mukherjee A, Sexton JB, et al: Oper-
lution of Crew Resource Management training in simulation for training in acute pediatric emer- ating room briefings and wrong-site surgery. J
commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol 9:19-32, gencies. Curr Opin Pediatr 18:266-271, 2006. Am Coll Surg 204:236-243, 2007.
1999. 36. Knudson MM, Khaw L, Bullard MK, et al: 56. Marshall DA, Manus DA: A team training
15. Billings CE, Reynard WD: Human factors in air- Trauma training in simulation: Translating skills program using human factors to enhance patient
craft incidents: Results of a 7-year study. Aviat from SIM time to real time. J Trauma 64:255-263; safety. AORN J 86:994-1011, 2007.
Space Environ Med 55:960-965, 1984. discussion 263-264, 2008. 57. Makary MA, Holzmueller CG, Sexton JB, et al:
16. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Fish KJ, et al: Simulation- 37. Berkenstadt H, Erez D, Munz Y, et al: Training Operating room debriefings. Jt Comm J Qual
based training in anesthesia crisis resource man- and assessment of trauma management: The role Patient Saf 32:407-410, 2006.
agement (ACRM): A decade of experience. of simulation-based medical education. Anesthe- 58. Awad SS, Fagan SP, Bellows C, et al: Bridging the
Simulation and Gaming 32:175-193, 2001. siol Clin 25:65-74, 2007. communication gap in the operating room with
17. Jensen RS, Biegelski CS: Cockpit Resource 38. Maslovitz S, Barkai G, Lessing JB, et al: Recurrent medical team training. Am J Surg 190:770-774,
Management. Aldershot, U.K. Gower Technical, obstetric management mistakes identified by 2005.
1989. simulation. Obstet Gynecol 109:1295-1300, 2007. 59. Kobayashi L, Suner S, Shapiro MJ, et al: Multipa-
18. Weiner EL, Kanki BG, Helmreich RL: Cockpit 39. Wallin CJ, Meurling L, Hedman L, et al: Target- tient disaster scenario design using mixed modal-
Resource Management. San Diego, Academic focused medical emergency team training using ity medical simulation for the evaluation of
Press, 1993. a human patient simulator: Effects on behaviour civilian prehospital medical response: A dirty
19. Dieckmann P, Rall M: Simulators in anaesthetic and attitude. Med Educ 41:173-180, 2007. bomb case study. Simulation in Healthcare 2:72-
training to enhance patient safety. In Cashman 40. Rudy SJ, Polomano R, Murray WB, et al: Team 78, 2006.
JN, Grounds RM (eds): Recent Advances in management training using crisis resource man- 60. Kyle RR, Via DK, Lowy J, et al: A multi-discipli-
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. Cambridge, agement results in perceived benefits by health- nary approach to teach responses to weapons of
Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp 211-232. care workers. J Contin Educ Nurs 38:219-226, mass destruction and terrorism using combined
20. Dieckmann P, Wehner T, Rall M, Manser T: Pros- 2007. simulation modalities. J Clin Anesth 16:(2):152-
pektive Simulation: Ein Konzept zur methodis- 41. Dunn EJ, Mills PD, Neily J, et al: Medical team 158, 2004.
chen Ergnzung von medizinischen training: Applying crew resource management in 60a. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as
Simulator settings. Zeitschrift Arbeitswissen- the Veterans Health Administration. Jt Comm J the Source of Learning and Development. Engle-
schaften ZfA 59:172-180, 2005. Qual Patient Saf 33:317-325, 2007. wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.
21. Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M: Deepening the 42. Gaba D: What does simulation add to teamwork 61. Cumin D, Merry AF: Simulators for use in anaes-
theoretical foundations of patient simulation as training? AHRQ WebM&M Case Commentary, thesia. Anaesthesia 62:151-162, 2007.
social practice. Simulation in Healthcare 3:183- 2006. 62. Schwid HA: A flight simulator for general anes-
193, 2007. 43. Weinstock PH, Kappus LJ, Kleinman ME, et al: thesia training. Comput Biomed Res 20:64-75,
22. Dieckmann P, Manser T, Wehner T, Rall M: Toward a new paradigm in hospital-based pedi- 1987.
Reality and fiction cues in medical patient simula- atric education: The development of an onsite 63. Schwid HA, ODonnell D: The anesthesia simula-
tion: An interview study with anesthesiologists. simulator program. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6:635- tor-recorder: A device to train and evaluate anes-
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision 641, 2005. thesiologists responses to critical incidents.
Making 1:148-168, 2007. 44. Shapiro MJ, Morey JC, Small SD, et al: Simulation Anesthesiology 72:191-197, 1990.
23. Hays RT, Singer MJ: Simulation Fidelity in Train- based teamwork training for emergency depart- 64. Schwid HA, ODonnell D: Anesthesiologists
ing System Design: Bridging the Gap Between ment staff: Does it improve clinical team perfor- management of simulated critical incidents.
Reality and Training. New York, Springer, 1989. mance when added to an existing didactic Anesthesiology 76:495-501, 1992.
24. Feinstein AH, Cannon HM: Constructs of simu- teamwork curriculum? Qual Saf Health Care 65. Kalawsky RS: The Science of Virtual Reality and
lation evaluation. Simulation and Gaming 13:417-421, 2004. Virtual Environments. Workingham, England,
33:425-440, 2002. 45. Lighthall GK: Toward better outcomes through AddisonWesley Publishing Company, 1993.
25. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al: simulation-based multidisciplinary team train- 66. Gaba DM: Anesthesia simulatorsa virtual
Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simula- ing. In Dunn WF (ed): Simulators in Critical Care reality. American Society of Anesthesiologists
tions that lead to effective learning: A BEME sys- and Beyond. Des Plaines, Society of Critical Care Newsletter 57:20-23, 1993.
tematic review. Med Teach 27:10-28, 2005. Medicine, 2004, pp 54-60. 67. Gaba DM: Improving anesthesiologists perfor-
26. Scerbo MW, Dawson S: High fidelity, high perfor- 46. Ostergaard HT, Ostergaard D, Lippert A: Imple- mance by simulating reality [editorial; comment].
mance? Simulation in Healthcare 4:224-230, mentation of team training in medical education Anesthesiology 76:491-494, 1992.
2007. in Denmark. Qual Saf Health Care 13(Suppl 68. Cooper JB, Blum RH, Carroll JS, et al: Differences
27. Rudolph J, Simon R: Which reality matters? I):i91-i95, 2004. in safety climate among hospital anesthesia
Questions on the path to high engagement in 47. Rall M, Manser T, Howard S: Key elements of departments and the effect of a realistic simulation-
healthcare simulation. Simulation in Healthcare debriefing for simulator training. Eur J Anaesthe- based training program. Anesth Analg 106:574-
3:161-163, 2007. siol 17:516-517, 2000. 584, 2008.
28. Salas E, Bowers CA, Rhodenizer L: It is not how 48. McDonnell LK, Jobe KK, Dismukes RK: Facilitat- 69. Gaba D, Howard S, Fish K, et al: Simulation-
much you have but how you use it: Toward a ing LOS Debriefings: A Training ManualPart 1: based training in anesthesia crisis resource man-
rational use of simulation to support aviation An Introduction to Facilitation. Moffett Field, agement (ACRM): A decade of experience.
training. Int J Aviat Psychol 8:197-208, 1998. Ames Research Center, 1997. Simulation and Gaming 32:175-193, 2001.
29. Salas E, Burke CS: Simulation for training is effec- 49. Dismukes K, Gaba D, Howard S: So many roads: 70. Smith B, Gaba D: Simulators. In Lake C, Hines R,
tive when. Qual Saf Health Care 11:119-120, Facilitated debriefing in healthcare [editorial]. Blitt C (eds): Clinical Monitoring: Practical
2002. Simulation in Healthcare 1:23-25, 2006. Applications for Anesthesia and Critical Care.
30. Baker DP, Day R, Salas E: Teamwork as an essen- 50. Fanning RM, Gaba DM: The role of debriefing in Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2001, pp 26-44.
tial component of high-reliability organizations. simulation-based learning. Simulation in Health- 71. Abrahamson S, Denson JS, Wolf RM: Effective-
Health Serv Res 41:1576-1598, 2006. care 2:115-125, 2007. ness of a simulator in training anesthesiology
31. Baker DP, Gustafson S, Beaubien JM, et al: 51. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, et al: Debriefing residents. J Med Educ 44:515-519, 1969.
Medical Teamwork and Patient Safety: The Evi- with good judgment: Combining rigorous feed- 72. Cooper JB, Newborner RS, Kitz RJ: An analysis
denceBased Relation. Literature Review. Rock- back with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin of major errors and equipment failures in anes-
ville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and 25:361-376, 2007. thesia management: Considerations for preven-
Quality, 2005. 52. Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, et al: Value of tion and detection. Anesthesiology 60:34-42,
32. Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, et al: Markers for debriefing during simulated crisis management: 1984.
enhancing team cognition in complex environ- Oral versus video-assisted oral feedback. Anes- 73. Gaba DM, Maxwell M, DeAnda A: Anesthetic
ments: The power of team performance diagnosis. thesiology 105:279-285, 2006. mishaps: Breaking the chain of accident evolu-
Aviat Space Environ Med 78:B77-B85, 2007. 53. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB: tion. Anesthesiology 66:670-676, 1987.
33. Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, Wightman DC: Theres no such thing as a nonjudgmental 74. Gaba DM: Human error in anesthetic mishaps.
Does crew resource management training work? debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing Int Anesthesiol Clin 27:137-147, 1989.
An update, an extension, and some critical needs. with good judgment. Simulation in Healthcare 75. Weinger MB, Englund CE: Ergonomic and
Hum Factors 48:392-412, 2006. 1:49-55, 2006. human factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and
34. Salas E, Bowers CA, Edens E: Improving Team- 54. OBrien G, Haughton A, Flanagan B: Interns monitoring performance in the operating room
work in OrganizationsApplications of Resource perceptions of performance and confidence in environment. Anesthesiology 73:995-1021, 1990.
Management Training. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence participating in and managing simulated and real 76. Morgan PJ, CleaveHogg D: A Canadian simula-
A Erlbaum, 2001. cardiac arrest situations. Med Teach 23:389-395, tion experience: Faculty and student opinions of
209 7
a performance evaluation study. Br J Anaesth simulation: Importance to the internal medicine Br J Anaesth 98(4):417-419, 2007.
85:779-781, 2000. educational mission. Am J Med 120:820-824, 119. Overly FL, Sudikoff SN, Shapiro MJ: High-fidelity
77. Gaba DM: Two examples of how to evaluate the 2007. medical simulation as an assessment tool for
impact of new approaches to teaching [editorial]. 99. Thomas EJ, Taggart B, Crandell S, et al: Teaching pediatric residents airway management skills.
Anesthesiology 96:1-2, 2002. teamwork during the Neonatal Resuscitation Pediatr Emerg Care 23:11-15, 2007.
78. Coates WC, Steadman RH, Huang YM, et al: Full- Program: A randomized trial. J Perinatol 27:409- 120. Eppich WJ, Brannen M, Hunt EA: Team training:
scale high fidelity human patient simulation vs 414, 2007. Implications for emergency and critical care pedi-
problem based learning: Comparing two interac- 100. Steadman RH, Coates WC, Huang YM, et al: atrics. Curr Opin Pediatr 2008.
tive educational modalities. Acad Emerg Med Simulation-based training is superior to problem- 121. Ralston M, Hazinski MF, Zaritsky AL, et al: PALS
10:489, 2003. based learning for the acquisition of critical Course Guide. Dallas, TX, American Heart Asso-
79. Gordon JA, Shaffer DW, Raemer DB, et al: A ran- assessment and management skills. Crit Care ciation, 2006.
domized controlled trial of simulation-based Med 34:151-157, 2006. 122. Krug SE, Frush K: Patient safety in the pediatric
teaching versus traditional instruction in medi- 101. Wright SW, Lindsell CJ, Hinckley WR, et al: High emergency care setting. Pediatrics 120:1367-1375,
cine: A pilot study among clinical medical stu- fidelity medical simulation in the difficult envi- 2007.
dents. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract ronment of a helicopter: Feasibility, self-efficacy 123. Eich C, Russo S, Timmermann A, et al: [New
11:33-39, 2006. and cost. BMC Med Educ 6:49, 2006. perspectives for simulator-based training in pae-
80. Gordon JA: The human patient simulator: 102. Pronovost P, Goeschel C: Improving ICU care: It diatric anaesthesia and emergency medicine].
Acceptance and efficacy as a teaching tool for takes a team. Health Exec 20:14-16, 2005. Anaesthetist 55(2):179-184, 2006.
students. Acad Med 75:522, 2000. 103. Sundar E, Sundar S, Pawlowski J, et al: Crew 124. Eppich WJ, Arnold LD: Family member presence
81. Euliano TY: Teaching respiratory physiology: resource management and team training. Anes- in the pediatric emergency department. Curr

I
Clinical correlation with a human patient simula- thesiol Clin 25:283-300, 2007. Opin Pediatr 15:294-298, 2003.
tor. J Clin Monit Comput 16:465-470, 2000. 104. Rall M: Symposium: Simulation in Anaesthesia 125. Byrne AJ, Jones JG: Responses to simulated

82. Gordon J: The human patient simulator: Accept- and Intensive Care Medicine 2000 Annual anaesthetic emergencies by anaesthetists with dif-
ance and efficacy as a teaching tool for students. Meeting of the Society in Europe for Simulation ferent durations of clinical experience. Br J
Acad Med 75:522, 2000. Applied to Medicine (SESAM) [editorial]. Eur J Anaesth 78:553-556, 1997.
83. Gordon JA, Wilkerson WM, Shaffer DW, Arm- Anaesthesiol 17:515, 2000. 126. DeAnda A, Gaba DM: Role of experience in the
strong EG: Practicing medicine without risk: 105. Lussi C, Grapengeter M, Schuttler J: [Simulator response to simulated critical incidents. Anesth
Students and educators responses to high-fidel- training in anesthesia: Applications and value]. Analg 72:308-315, 1991.
ity patient simulation. Acad Med 76:469-472, Anaesthetist 48:433-438, 1999. 127. Schwid HA, Rooke GA, Carline J, et al: Evaluation
2001. 106. Lussi C, Grapengeter M, Engl HG, et al: Crisis of anesthesia residents using mannequin-based
84. Gordon JA, Pawlowski J: Education on-demand: resource management (CRM) training using a simulation: A multiinstitutional study. Anesthesi-
The development of a simulator-based medical patient simulator: Course evaluation. Anasthesi- ology 97:1434-1444, 2002.
education service. Acad Med 77:751-752, 2002. ologie Intensivmedizin 40:729-733, 1999. 128. Gardi T, Christensen UC, Jacobsen J, et al: How
85. Gordon JA, Farrell SE, Pawlowski JB, et al: Educa- 107. Schuttler J: [Training in a simulator: Play or indis- do anaesthesiologists treat malignant hyperther-
tion on demand: The development of a simula- pensable component of the medical learning mia in a full-scale anaesthesia simulator? Acta
tor-based medical education service. Acad Emerg process?]. Anaesthetist 48:431-432, 1999. Anaesthesiol Scand 45:1032-1035, 2001.
Med 9:1059, 2002. 108. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al: Simu- 129. Devitt JH, Kurrek MM, Cohen MM, et al: Testing
86. Gordon JA: The human patient simulator: lation technology for health care professional internal consistency and construct validity during
Acceptance and efficacy as a teaching tool for skills training and assessment. JAMA 282:861- evaluation of performance in a patient simulator.
students. The Medical Readiness Trainer Team. 866, 1999. Anesth Analg 86:1160-1164, 1998.
Acad Med 75:522, 2000. 109. Kurrek MM, Fish KJ: Anesthesia crisis resource 130. Jacobsen J, Lindekaer AL, Ostergaard HT, et al:
87. Gordon JJ, Saunders NA, Hennrikus D, Sanson management training: An intimidating concept, a Management of anaphylactic shock evaluated
Fisher RW: Interns performances with simulated rewarding experience. Can J Anesth 43:430-434, using a full-scale anaesthesia simulator. Acta
patients at the beginning and the end of the intern 1996. Anaesthesiol Scand 45:315-319, 2001.
year. J Gen Intern Med 7:57-62, 1992. 110. Yaeger KA, Halamek LP, Coyle M, et al: High- 131. Howard SK, Gaba DM, Fish KJ, et al:

88. Issenberg SB, Gordon DL, Safford RE, Hart IR: fidelity simulation-based training in neonatal Anesthesia crisis resource management training:
Simulation and new learning technologies. Med nursing. Adv Neonatal Care 4:326-331, 2004. Teaching anesthesiologists to handle critical
Teach 23:16-23, 2001. 111. Halamek LP, Kaegi DM, Gaba DM, et al: Time for incidents. Aviat Space Environ Med 63:763-770,
89. ODonnell J, Fletcher J, Dixon B, Palmer L: Plan- a new paradigm in pediatric medical education: 1992.
ning and implementing an anesthesia crisis Teaching neonatal resuscitation in a simulated 132. Hammond J, Bermann M, Chen B, Kushins L:
resource management course for student nurse delivery room environment. Pediatrics 106:E45, Incorporation of a computerized human patient
anesthetists. CRNA 2:50-58, 1998. 2000. simulator in critical care training: A preliminary
90. Rall M, Schaedle B, Zieger J, et al: [Innovative 112. Smith HM, Jacob AK, Segura LG, et al: Simula- report. J Trauma 53:1064-1067, 2002.
training for enhancing patient safety: Safety tion education in anesthesia training: A case 133. Ellis C, Hughes G: Use of human patient simula-
culture and integrated concepts]. Unfallchirurg report of successful resuscitation of bupivacaine- tion to teach emergency medicine trainees
105:1033-1042, 2002. induced cardiac arrest linked to recent simulation advanced airway skills. J Accid Emerg Med
91. Ohrn MAK, van Meurs WL, Good ML: Labora- training. Anesth Analg 106:1581-1584, 2008. 16:395-399, 1999.
tory classes: Replacing animals with a patient 113. Lighthall GK, Barr J, Howard SK, et al: Use of a 134. Kaufmann C, Liu A: Trauma training: Virtual
simulator [abstract]. Anesthesiology 83:A1028, fully simulated ICU environment for critical reality applications. Stud Health Technol Inform
1995. event management training for internal medicine 81:236-241, 2001.
92. Morgan PJ, CleaveHogg D: Comparison residents. Crit Care Med 31:2437-2443, 2003. 135. Small S, Wuertz R, Simon R, et al: Demonstration
between medical students experience, confidence 114. FellanderTsai L, Stahre C, Anderberg B, et al: of high-fidelity simulation team training for
and competence. Med Educ 36:534-539, 2002. [Simulator training in medicine and health care: emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 6:312-
93. Hodges B: Medical education and the mainte- A new pedagogic model for good patient safety]. 323, 1999.
nance of incompetence. Med Teach 28:690-696, Lakartidningen 98:3772-3776, 2001. 136. McLaughlin SA, Doezema D, Sklar DP: Human
2006. 115. Larbuisson R, Pendeville P, Nyssen AS, et al: Use simulation in emergency medicine training: A
94. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Long CD, McPeek B: of Anaesthesia Simulator: Initial impressions of model curriculum. Acad Emerg Med 9:1310-
Preventable anesthesia mishaps: A study of its use in two Belgian University Centers. Acta 1318, 2002.
human factors. Anesthesiology 49:399-406, 1978. Anaesthesiol Belg 50:87-93, 1999. 137. Reznek M, SmithCoggins R, Howard S, et al:
95. Howard SK, Gaba D, Fish KJ, et al: Anesthesia 116. Lindekaer AL, Jacobsen J, Andersen G, et al:
Emergency Medicine Crisis Management
crisis resource management training: Teaching Treatment of ventricular fibrillation during (EMCM): Pilot investigation of a simulation-
anesthesiologists to handle critical incidents. anaesthesia in an anaesthesia simulator. Acta based crisis management. Acad Emerg Med
Aviat Space Environ Med 63:763-770, 1992. Anaesthesiol Scand 41:1280-1284, 1997. 9:430, 2002.
96. Adler MD, Trainor JL, Siddall VJ, McGaghie WC: 117. Hayes CW, Rhee A, Detsky ME, et al: Residents 138. Wong SH, Ng KF, Chen PP: The application of
Development and evaluation of high-fidelity feel unprepared and unsupervised as leaders of clinical simulation in crisis management training.
simulation case scenarios for pediatric resident cardiac arrest teams in teaching hospitals: A Hong Kong Med J 8:131-135, 2002.
education. Ambul Pediatr 7:182-186, 2007. survey of internal medicine residents. Crit Care 139. Patel RM, Crombleholme WR: Using simulation
97. Murphy JG, Torsher LC, Dunn WF: Simulation Med 35:1668-1672, 2007. to train residents in managing critical events.
medicine in intensive care and coronary care edu- 118. Eich C, Russo SG, Nickel EA, et al: Simulator- Acad Med 73:593, 1998.
cation. J Crit Care 22:51-55, 2007. based training in paediatric anaesthesia and 140. Halamek L, Howard S, Smith B, et al: Develop-
98. Ogden PE, Cobbs LS, Howell MR, et al: Clinical emergency medicinethrills, skills and attitudes. ment of a simulated delivery room for the study
A
I 210

of human performance during neonatal resuscita- tists NonTechnical Skills (ANTS): Evaluation of 185. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Flanagan B, et al: Assess-
tion. Pediatrics 100(Suppl):513-524, 1997. a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth ment of clinical performance during simulated
141. Kurrek MM, Devitt JH, Cohen M: Cardiac arrest 90:580-588, 2003. crises using both technical and behavioral ratings
in the OR: How are our ACLS skills? Can J 163. Fletcher GC, McGeorge P, Flin RH, et al: The role [see comments]. Anesthesiology 89:8-18, 1998.
Anaesth 45:130-132, 1998. of non-technical skills in anaesthesia: A review of 186. Byrne A, Jones J: Responses to simulated anaes-
142. Palmisano J, Akingbola O, Moler F, Custer J:
current literature. Br J Anaesth 88:418-429, 2002. thetic emergencies by anaesthetists with different
Simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscita- 164. Glavin RJ, Maran NJ: Development and use of durations of clinical experience. Br J Anaesth
tion: Initial events and response times of a hospi- scoring systems for assessment of clinical compe- 78:553-556, 1997.
tal arrest team. Respir Care 39:725-729, 1994. tence. Br J Anaesth 88:329-330, 2002. 187. Gaba DM, DeAnda A: The response of anesthesia
143. Christensen UJ, Heffernan D, Andersen SF,
165. Chopra V, Gesink BJ, de Jong J, et al: Does train- trainees to simulated critical incidents. Anesth
Jensen PF: ResusSim 98a PC advanced life ing on an anaesthesia simulator lead to improve- Analg 68:444-451, 1989.
support trainer. Resuscitation 39:81-84, 1998. ment in performance? Br J Anaesth 73:293-297, 188. Gaba DM: Research techniques in human perfor-
144. Hendrickse AD, Ellis AM, Morris RW: Use of 1994. mance using realistic simulation. In Henson LC,
simulation technology in Australian Defence 166. Slagle J, Weinger M, Dinh M-T, et al: Assessment Lee AC (eds): Simulators in Anesthesiology Edu-
Force resuscitation training. J R Army Med Corps of the intrarater and interrater reliability of an cation. New York, Plenum Press, 1998, pp 93-102.
147:173-178, 2001. established clinical task analysis methodology. 189. Weller J, Wilson L, Robinson B: Survey of change
145. Manser T, Dieckmann P, Wehner T, Rall M: Com- Anesthesiology 96:1129-1139, 2002. in practice following simulation-based training
parison of anaesthetists activity patterns in the 167. Weinger MB, Slagle J: Human factors research in in crisis management. Anaesthesia 58:471-473,
operating room and during simulation. Ergo- anesthesia patient safety. Proc AMIA Symp 756- 2003.
nomics 50:246-260, 2007. 760, 2001. 190. Murray D, Enarson C: Communication and

146. Dieckmann P, Reddersen S, Wehner T, Rall M: 168. Devitt J, Kurreck M, Cohen M, CleaveHogg D: teamwork: Essential to learn but difficult to
Prospective memory failures as an unexplored The validity of performance assessments using measure. Anesthesiology 106:895-896, 2007.
threat to patient safety: Results from a pilot study simulation. Anesthesiology 95:36-42, 2001. 191. Jankouskas T, Bush MC, Murray B, et al: Crisis
using patient simulators to investigate the missed 169. Devitt J, Kurrek M, Cohen M, et al: Testing inter- resource management: Evaluating outcomes of
execution of intentions. Ergonomics 49:526-543, nal consistency and construct validity during multidisciplinary teams. Simulation in Health-
2006. evaluation of performance in a patient simulator. care 2:96-101, 2007.
147. Kofke WA, Rie MA, Rosen K: Acute care crisis Anesth Analg 86:1160-1164, 1998. 192. Murray DJ, Boulet JR, Kras JF, et al: A simulation-
simulation for jury education. Med Law 20:79-83, 170. Devitt J, Kurrek M, Cohen M, et al: Testing the based acute skills performance assessment for
2001. raters: Interrater reliability of standardized anaes- anesthesia training. Anesth Analg 101:1127-1134,
148. Flanagan B, Clavisi O, Nestel D: Efficacy and
thesia simulator performance. Can J Anaesth 2005.
effectiveness of simulation based training for 44:924-928, 1997. 193. Murray DJ, Boulet JR, Kras JF, et al: Acute care
learning and assessment in health care (report). 171. Byrne A, Hilton P, Lunn J: Basic simulations for skills in anesthesia practice: A simulation-based
Melbourne, 2007, pp 1-90. Available at: http:// anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 49:376-381, 1994. resident performance assessment. Anesthesiology
www.health.vic.gov.au/workforce/research.htm. 172. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Gordon DL,
101:1084-1095, 2004.
149. Gaba D, DeAnda A: A comprehensive anesthesia Petrusa ER: Assessment instruments used during 194. Boulet JR, Murray D, Kras J, et al: Reliability and
simulation environment: Re-creating the operat- anaesthetic simulation. Br J Anaesth 87:647-648, validity of a simulation-based acute care assess-
ing room for research and training. Anesthesiol- 2001. ment for medical students and residents. Anes-
ogy 69:387-394, 1988. 173. Barsuk D, Ziv A, Lin G, et al: Using advanced thesiology 99:1270-1280, 2003.
150. Gaba D: Improving anesthesiologists perfor-
simulation for recognition and correction of gaps 195. Morgan PJ, Pittini R, Regehr G, et al: Evaluating
mance by simulating reality [editorial]. Anesthe- in airway and breathing management skills in teamwork in a simulated obstetric environment.
siology 76:491-494, 1992. prehospital trauma care. Anesth Analg 100:803- Anesthesiology 106:907-915, 2007.
151. Chopra V, Gesink B, De Jong J, et al: Does training 809, 2005. 196. Nishisaki A, Keren R, Nadkarni V: Does simula-
on an anaesthesia simulator lead to improvement 174. Ziv A, Berkenstadt H: National interdisciplinary, tion improve patient safety? Self-efficacy, compe-
in performance? Br J Anaesth 73:293-297, 1994. multimodality simulation center: The Israel tence, operational performance, and patient
152. Byrne A, Greaves J: Assessment instruments used model and experience. In Dunn WF (ed): Simula- safety. Anesthesiol Clin 25:225-236, 2007.
during anaesthetic simulation: Review of pub- tors in Critical Care and Beyond. Des Plaines, 197. Small SD: Simulation applications for human

lished studies. Br J Anaesth 86:445-450, 2001. Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2004, pp 67-71. factors and systems evaluation. Anesthesiol Clin
153. Gaba D: The human work environment and anes- 175. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S: Simulation- 25:237-259, 2007.
thesia simulators. In Miller R (ed): Anesthesia, based medical education: An ethical imperative. 198. Ottestad E, Boulet JR, Lighthall GK: Evaluating
5th ed. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1999, pp Acad Med 78:783-788, 2003. the management of septic shock using patient
2613-2668. 176. Rosenstock C, Ostergaard D, Kristensen MS, et al: simulation. Crit Care Med 35:769-775, 2007.
154. Howard S, Keshavacharya S, Smith B, et al:
Residents lack knowledge and practical skills in 199. Hunt EA, Heine M, Hohenhaus SM, et al: Simu-
Behavioral evidence of fatigue during a simulator handling the difficult airway. Acta Anaesthesiol lated pediatric trauma team management: Assess-
experiment. Anesthesiology 89:A1236, 1998. Scand 48:1014-1018, 2004. ment of an educational intervention. Pediatr
155. Weinger MB, Herdon OW, Gaba DM: The effect 177. Ostergaard D: National Medical Simulation train- Emerg Care 23:796-804, 2007.
of electronic record keeping and transesophageal ing program in Denmark. Crit Care Med 32:S58- 200. Harrison TK, Manser T, Howard SK, Gaba DM:
echocardiography on task distribution, workload, S60, 2004. Use of cognitive aids in a simulated anesthetic
and vigilance during cardiac anesthesia. Anesthe- 178. Bronfenbrenner U: The Ecology of Human Devel- crisis. Anesth Analg 103:551-556, 2006.
siology 87:144-155, 1997. opment. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 201. Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Joo HS, et al: Evaluation
156. Gaba D, Howard S, Small S: Situation awareness 1979. of patient simulator performance as an adjunct to
in anesthesiology. Hum Factors 37:20-31, 1995. 179. Manser T, Wehner T: Analysing action sequences: the oral examination for senior anesthesia resi-
157. Holzman R, Cooper J, Gaba D, et al: Anesthesia Variations in action density in the administration dents. Anesthesiology 104:475-481, 2006.
crisis resource management: Real-life simulation of anaesthesia. Cognition Tech Work 4:71-81, 202. Scavone BM, Sproviero MT, McCarthy RJ, et al:
training in operating room crises. J Clin Anesth 2002. Development of an objective scoring system for
7:675-687, 1995. 180. Schwid H, ODonnell D: Anesthesiologists man- measurement of resident performance on the
158. Weinger MB, Herndon OW, Zornow MH, et al: agement of simulated critical incidents. Anesthe- human patient simulator. Anesthesiology
An objective methodology for task analysis and siology 76:495-501, 1992. 105:260-266, 2006.
workload assessment in anesthesia providers. 181. DeAnda A, Gaba D: Unplanned incidents during 203. Friedman Z, Katznelson R, Devito I, et al: Objec-
Anesthesiology 80:77-92, 1994. comprehensive anesthesia simulation. Anesth tive assessment of manual skills and proficiency
159. Howard S, Gaba D, Fish K, et al: Anesthesia crisis Analg 71:77-82, 1990. in performing epidural anesthesiavideo-
resource management training: Teaching anes- 182. Gaba D, DeAnda A: The response of anesthesia assisted validation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 31:304-
thesiologists to handle critical incidents. Aviat trainees to simulated critical incidents. Anesth 310, 2006.
Space Environ Med 63:763-770, 1992. Analg 68:444-451, 1989. 204. Jacobsohn E, Klock PA, Avidan M: Poor inter-
160. DeAnda A, Gaba D: The role of experience in the 183. Dieckmann P, Manser T, Schaedle B, Rall M: How rater reliability on mock anesthesia oral examina-
response to simulated critical incidents. Anesth do anesthesiologists experience a simulator tions. Can J Anaesth 53:659-668, 2006.
Analg 72:308-315, 1991. setting in comparison with clinical settings? 205. Reader T, Flin R, Lauche K, Cuthbertson BH:
161. Forrest F, Taylor M, Postlehwaite K, Aspinall R: Results from an interview study [Abstract San- Non-technical skills in the intensive care unit. Br
Use of the high-fidelity simulator to develop tander-02-12]. Eur J Anaesthesiol 20:846, 2003. J Anaesth 96:551-559, 2006.
testing of the technical performance of novice 184. Gaba D, Fish K, Howard S: Crisis Management in 206. Wayne DB, Butter J, Siddall VJ, et al: Mastery
anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 88:338-344, 2002. Anesthesiology. New York, Churchill Livingstone, learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by
A 162. Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P, et al: Anaesthe- 1994. internal medicine residents using simulation
211 7
technology and deliberate practice. J Gen Intern Emerg Med 10:488, 2003. 01-E058). Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare
Med 21:251-256, 2006. 215. Weller JM, Bloch M, Young S, et al: Evaluation of Research and Quality, 2001.
207. Kim J, Neilipovitz D, Cardinal P, et al: A pilot high fidelity patient simulator in assessment of 225. Berkenstadt H, Kantor GS, Yusim Y, et al: The
study using high-fidelity simulation to formally performance of anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 90:43- feasibility of sharing simulation-based evaluation
evaluate performance in the resuscitation of criti- 47, 2003. scenarios in anesthesiology. Anesth Analg
cally ill patients: The University of Ottawa Critical 216. Weinger M, Herndon O, Zornow M, et al: An 101:1068-1074, 2005.
Care Medicine, HighFidelity Simulation, and objective methodology for task analysis and 226. Lamb D: Could simulated emergency procedures
Crisis Resource Management I Study. Crit Care workload assessment in anesthesia providers. practised in a static environment improve the
Med 34:2167-2174, 2006. Anesthesiology 77-92, 1994. clinical performance of a Critical Care Air
208. Zirkle M, Blum R, Raemer DB, et al: Teaching 217. Brennan RL: Elements of Generalizability Theory. Support Team (CCAST)? A literature review.
emergency airway management using medical Iowa City, American College Testing Program, Intensive Crit Care Nurs 23:33-42, 2007.
simulation: A pilot program. Laryngoscope 1992. 227. Kurrek M, Devitt J: The cost for construction and
115:495-500, 2005. 218. Shavelson R: Generalizability Theory: A Primer. maintenance of a simulation centre. Can J
209. Blum RH, Raemer DB, Carroll JS, et al: A method Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications, 1991.
Anaesth 44:1191-1195, 1997.
for measuring the effectiveness of simulation- 219. Myerson KR: Can we assess professional

228. Morgan PJ, CleaveHogg D: A worldwide survey
based team training for improving communica- behavior in anesthetists? Anesthesia 53:1039-
of the use of simulation in anesthesia. Can J
tion skills. Anesth Analg 100:1375-1380, 2005. 1040, 1998.
Anaesth 49:659-662, 2002.
210. DeVita MA, Schaefer J, Lutz J, et al: Improving 220. Kapur P, Steadman R: Patient simulator compe-
229. Wiener E, Kanki B, Helmreich R: Cockpit

medical emergency team (MET) performance tency testing: ready for takeoff? Anesth Analg
Resource Management. San Diego, Academic
using a novel curriculum and a computerized 86:1157-1159, 1998.

I
Press, 1993.
human patient simulator. Qual Saf Health Care 221. Klemola UM, Norros L: Practice-based criteria
230. Orlady H: Airline pilot training today and tomor-
14:326-331, 2005. for assessing anaesthetists habits of action:
211. Rall M, Gaba DM: Human performance and
Outline for a reflexive turn in practice. Med Educ row. In Wiener E, Kanki B, Helmreich R (eds):
patient safety. In Miller RD (ed): Millers Anesthe- 35:455-464, 2001. Cockpit Resource Management. San Diego, Aca-
sia, 6th ed. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone, 222. Greaves JD, Grant J: Watching anaesthetists work: demic Press, 1993, pp 447-478.
2005, pp 3021-3072. Using the professional judgement of consultants 231. Gaba DM: The future vision of simulation in

212. Pronovost PJ, Nolan T, Zeger S, et al: How can to assess the developing clinical competence of healthcare. Simulation in Healthcare 2:126-135,
clinicians measure safety and quality in acute trainees. Br J Anaesth 84:525-533, 2000. 2007.
care? Lancet 363:1061-1067, 2004. 223. Epstein RM, Hundert EM: Defining and assessing 232. Gaba DM: A brief history of mannequin-based
213. Gisondi MA, SmithCoggins R, Harter PM, et al: professional competence. JAMA 287:226-235, 2002. simulation and application. In Dunn WF (ed):
Assessment of resident professionalism using 224. Jha AK, Duncan BW, Bates DW: Simulator-based Simulators in Critical Care and Beyond. Des
high-fidelity simulation of ethical dilemmas. training and patient safety. In Shojania KG, Plaines, Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2004,
Acad Emerg Med 11:931-937, 2004. Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM (eds): pp 7-14.
214. Shapiro MJ, Kobayashi L, Morchi R: High-fidelity Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of 233. Yule S, Flin R, PatersonBrown S, et al: Develop-
medical simulation and its role in evaluating Patient Safety Practices (Evidence Report/Tech- ment of a rating system for surgeons non-techni-
advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) skills. Acad nology Assessment No. 43. AHRQ Publication cal skills. Med Educ 40:1098-1104, 2006.

A
Alan Jay Schwartz
..
..


1. ( ,
), ,
/.
,
. , .
, 5.
. (ACGME)
, . ,
2. ,
. , . ,

. :
, / . .
,
,
. .
.
,
. ,
, ,
, , , ,
. .
. ,
.
.
,
, , ,
.

. .
, , .
.
. ,
. , ,
- ,
, . - .
.
, .
3. 2006. 4970 -
131 .
360 .
213

. ,
4. Silber ..29 , ,
6000 ,
A

213
I 214

.* .
6. 2006-2007 . .
5836 .
30. 5,6% 8.
4,7% .
30. 5836 Bloom39,
:
69028 -, 4970 . .
-, 360 . .
, . .
104879 . ;
12,32. .
7. , . ; .
, , . .
, .35 : 9.
. .
. . 54:
. . .
. . ,
. . .
. . .
. ,
. , .
. . ,
. .
. .
, .
-. * ACGME.
. www.acgme.org/outcome.

, - , ,
. , - . 3.

1:



, ,

- -
.
.
. -
, , ?
, ,
, .
.
: ( ), -
/-
, , , . ,
?! . , -
,
. -
, . , , -
. - ,
, .
(. 8-1). ,
(, ; ..,
, - - -
). , , .
, , - ,
. -
A ,
215 8
.
-
-
,
,
.

, -
, , , -
. ,
?
.


?
/

?


?
?

I
?






?
: -
? ,
. , --
, -
.2
, -
: -
, ,
-, ,
. 8-1 . ,
. - , ,
( , ,
, , ,
) . -
, /, -
, , - - -
. - ,
. 2.
, .
, ,

- , .
. , ,
. ( :
Atkins E: Curriculum Theorizing as a Scientific Pursuit: A Framework for Analysis
. -, , -
[unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pennsylvania, 1982.)

, .
,
- ,
. , , -
, /, -
, - .
- , -, , -
,
- , -
. . ,
, , , ,
,
, .
, -
, , , , , .. . -
: ?3 ?
.
, -
, , . ,
. - , , ,
, . , A
I 216

, .
, , . ?
-
, -
. ,
, (. . 1 2)4.
.
. , (B) -
,

, ,
. B , -
. , -
, -
. - -
- ,
, , -
, , , . ,
4.
, -
. -
- , , ,
. :
-
, - [] -
, . - -
-
. , -
, 2.
. ,
- ,
( ,
, . -
). -
. -,
, - -. -
, -
, ,
, , -
- ,
,
. ; -
- -
. ,
,
, - , -
. - - , -
. .
, .. ,
, , - . , ,
, -
, , . (
. -- ) , -
- - (),
, ,
, .4-6
. - -
-
- ,
, -
, . .4
, ,
, , -
- .4-6
, , - (-
A . ,
217 8
, , -
), - . -
-
, , , , -
-.4-6 , -
.
-
.4 .
, , - , -
-

() . - .
- ,
.7 -
.
, , ,

I
- , , -
- -
, .
. - ,
, , -
(ACGME). - , -
ACGME .
,
, , ,
.7 , - -
, , , ,
- -
(RRC), , , 4.
(ASA) -
.8 - ABAACGME , -
-
(1) ( ) .
, (2) -
, (3) ,
, (4) , (5) .
(6) .8,9 -
- , ABAACGME.
4: - -
--
, ABAACGME. 2007 .
- 108 -
. 24 36 (80%
27/28 ) 1200
1547 8248 -
(ACGME) -
(CRNA) 4689 , -
. ( -
, -: ,
, 2007). --
,
, - -
. .

, - 26 , /
71 10,11.
, , -
. - , 71 -
,
, 10,11. 50 -
, , ( ASA)
, 26
/
. .10,11 -
- ,
, 2007-2008 . 2468 A
I 218

6873 130 () -
231000 .10,11 () (. 8-2).
, ,
- ABMS
-
(www. 19.
arc-pa.org),
(www.ashp.org), -
ABMS
(www.cahiim.org), - :
-
(www.caahep.org) ,
(jrcert. -
org) (5 26 , , . ABMS
) , - ,
- , - -
, 5,19.
, , -
, , , -
, ABMS -
( ), - , , , --
, - , , ,
10,11. 2006. -
1572 - . 2006 . 24 ABMS
.10,11 2006 -
45285 .10,11 ABMS
, 2006.
4970 - (5,6% /
) 131 .
360 , -
(2,3% ) -
213 - .
(30 - ,
, 49 , , -
45 ) (.
8-1 ).12,13 ASA Newsletter 19.
- - 1989 .
( [CDQ]),
(NRMP), , -
.14,15 , -
- - ,
, , - 4,20,21. -
, -
-
21. 1993 . CDQ -
. :
, - -
, , . CDQ- -
, -
, , , -
, .. () , -
. .
, , ABA/ABMS
. , CDQ- .
, -, - 1994-1995 .
: (), -
, - 1 2000., -
, , , 10
-
.16-18 , - .4,22 1996 . CDQ
, , -
, - . , -
, .16-18 ,
-
(ABMS) -- , , -
A 24 ( ) .4,22 -
219 8
. 8-1 , , , , -

. , ,

/
- ,
, (%) - ACGME
,

1990 157 4362 3871 (88,7) 4144/69,798

1995 149 5490 4395 (81,1) 4245/85,732

2000 134 3837 1627 (42,4) 4268/85,460

2005 132 4785 3450 (72,1) 4151/86,975

I
2006 131 4970 3731 (75,1) 4134/89,269

. , ACGME
(%)

/
,
ACGME

1990 , 27 7 4 (57,1) 2447/8,006

1995 , 46 70 52 (74,3) 3264/12,100


, 55 112 83 (74,1)

2000 , 53 59 29 (49,2) 3678/12,529


, 98 215 100 (46,5)
, 37 63 33 (52,4)

2005 , 47 43 20 (46,5) 4095/14,316


, 95 190 88 (46,3)
, 43 91 43 (47,3)

2006 0 0 (0) 4368/15,610


, 30
, 49 44 22 (50)
, 89 206 127 (61,7)
, 45 110 78 (70,9)

2007-2008 0

129
264
166

. - ( )
-
(%
- )

1990 65,081 72,320 3393 (4,7)

1995 67,030 90,016 4535 (5,0)

2000 66,500 102,446 4979 (4,9)

2005 68,280 119,025 5471 (5,7)

2006 69,028 124,725 5836 (4,7)

the Journal of the American Medical Association, yearly Medical Education editions: 264, 1990; 274, 1995; 284, 2000; 294, 2005; and 298, 2007; Warner MA: Resi-
dency Review Committee for Anesthesiology. ASA Newsl 71:26-27, 2007

A
I 220

. 8-2 ,
(ABMS) -

1997 1997-2006 2000-2006
,
* 28,515 12,012 7,592

480 267

1,941 1,233 -
,
() -
-
602,578 242,684 167,656
,
76,782 51,057 .
* ABMS 1938 .,
(10 ) 2000 .

ABMS 1986 ., -
(10 ) 2000 .

. -
ABMS 1993 .,
(10 ) 1993 .


ABMS 2008 .,
(10 ) 2008 .
2007 Reference Handbook and Certificate Statistics. Evanston, IL, -
American Board of Medical Specialties, 2007
(PPAI)
PPAI

() -
.
10 5 7 - -

.
-
(. . 8-2).5 PPAI, ,
1985. 1991. -
, 2006 - .25
. 1998.
,
. 2000. -
- , -
. ,
. -
, , , ACGME 1999. .26
, ACGME ,
. -
(. . 1).27
.23,24 -
, -
() ,
.28
, () -
,
( 2000 .) ,
, - . ,
- , ,
. , .16,17 ,
10- , ,
, ,
, -
, .
. ,
- . , ..
- ,
, : , 16,17.
, ,
, - ABAACGME --
. . Silber a.c.29 6000
- ,
A : , ,
221 8
- . 8-3
- 1. .
. 2.
- .
.30 3.
, - .
30. - 4.
5. .
.31 ,
6.
, .
. 7. .
8.
.
9.
?
.
10.

I
-, -
.
, , -
, , , , 11.
-, . 2006. ,
Mattern WD, Weinholtz D, Friedman CP: The attending physician as
5836 (. 8-1).31 - teacher. N Engl J Med 308:1129, 1983
5,6%
4,7%
(. 8-1).32 5836

69028 - .34 , ,
-, 4970 - .34
, 360 , -
, - , --
, 104879 -- , -
(. . 8-1 -).12,32 , ,
, , .34 -
- ,
, . - .34
, ,
. - -
, -
. ,
, ,
. - ,
. .
? -
- ,
.33 , , -
, .33 ,
, .35 . 8-3 , -
, - ,
, , - -.
.33 , -
, -
, .
-. , - ,
- ,
, , -
- -. -
,
. , , ,
.
,
, .34,35 ,
, ,
, - . , -
. - , , ,
.34 - -
- . A
I 222

-
, ).
, Tyler,
, --
, .36 .38
Dewey.37 . 2. -
Dewey , . -
. -- , ,
, , , - .
- /
. : , -
. , -
. /- / .

. Tyler, - , -
, . .
, -
. , . Bloom39, / -
Dewey, , -
- :
,
. 1. .
, 2. .
, , 3. .
- , 4. ;
, .
. , , - 5. ; .
Dewey, - 6.

, , , ,
, ,
- . , -
. -
, , ,
? , - , -
() .
. -
. - /
? ,
- .
. , -
.
. , .. ,
, -
, . , -
. -

, .
-
? , -
.40-46
- /
, - .
. :47
,
, , 1. .
- 2. .
. 3. .
, - 4. .
, 5. .
,
. - -
- ,
- .
(, , ,
A .
223 8

. - ?
, -
- ,
- - .
- , -
. , -
. ,
- , -
. - , , -
, ,
, -
, .
,
.48 ,
- , -

I
. , , ,
-
- , .
. , -
- , .
, -
. - .
, , ,
, - , .
. , -
(.. )
-
. .
, , ,
. - , ( ), -
, , , , -
. - ,
- , , -
, , .
- -
. - -
, ,
() - , -
- ,
, . , -
.

.49,50 -
, - ,
,
- , ( )

, , ,
, - : (1) -
, (2) -
.4 ,
. -
-
,
, , . , ,
- , .. -
, - . , ,
. ,
(1) - ,
, (2) , .. -
/, (3)
-
, (4) - ( ,
).
.4 - A
I 224

. 8-2 . , ,
, . , , -
. , ,
. , -
56 .
, . ( Hutchins EB: Unpublished lecture notes: Evaluation Methods in
Professional Education. Course ED668, Graduate School of Education. University of Pennsylvania, 1981.)

- .
.49-51
- - : ,
(, -- .
, -, : ,
-, ,
), - , :
- .54 / -
.49-51
, .54
,
.52,53 1.
- , - ,
, .
2.
, , ,
, .
.52,53 3.
, - .
, . 4.
.
-
, , -
. - , ,
, -
, , , , , ,
, () ,
, - ,
, .
, , - , , -
, . , .55
- ,
. , -
, . ,
, , ,
.54 , ,
, , , -
. . , ,
, ,
. ,
(.. .
). -
, ,
,
- , -
, . -
. - , .
, -
, , , 35-
? PowerPoint,
?. ,
12- (3,6 ) 800 .
A , , , ,
225 8
, . : . , - . -
, , (.. )
, , , .
- ,
. , , .
, - -
- ,
. (. 8-2).
-
, --

.56
-
? : ,
? -
- ,

I
: -
.
, , ,
?


, , -
, George E. Miller -
, - .

Barrows HS: Simulated (Standardized) Patients and Knowles MS: Andragogy in Action. San Francisco, Popham WJ, Baker EL: Establishing Instructional
Other Human Simulations. Chapel Hill, NC, JosseyBass, 1984. Goals. Planning an Instructional Sequence. Engle-
Health Sciences Consortium, 1987. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (Committee on wood Cliffs, NJ, PrenticeHall, 1970.
Bunker JP (ed): Education in Anesthesiology. New Quality of Health Care in AmericaInstitute of Rosenthal MH, Hughes FP: A History of the American
York, Columbia University Press, 1967. Medicine) (eds): To Err Is Human. Building a Safer Board of Anesthesiology 1938-2003. Raleigh, NC,
Dick W, Reiser RA: Planning Effective Instruction. Health System. Washington, DC, National The American Board of Anesthesiology, 2005.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, PrenticeHall, 1989. Academy Press, 2000. Schwenk TL, Whitman NA: Residents As Teachers: A
Epstein J (ed): Masters: Portraits of Great Teachers. New Lear E (ed): Virtual reality in patient simulators. Am Guide to Educational Practice. Salt Lake City, Uni-
York, Basic Books, 1981. Soc Anesthesiol Newsl 61:October, 1997. versity of Utah, 1984.
Gagn RM, Briggs LJ: Principles of Instructional Lyman RA: Disaster in pedagogy. N Engl J Med 257:504, Schwenk TL, Whitman NA: The Physician As Teacher.
Design, 2nd ed. New York, Holt, Rinehart & 1957. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1987.
Winston, 1979. McGaghie WC, Frey JJ (eds): Handbook for the Aca- Segall AJ, Vanderschmidt H, Burglass R, et al: Systemic
Gawande A: Better: A Surgeons Notes on Performance. demic Physician. New York, SpringerVerlag, 1986. Course Design for the Health Fields. New York,
New York, Metropolitan Books, 2007. McGuire CH, Foley RP, Gorr A, et al: Handbook of John Wiley & Sons, 1975.
Greenberg LW, Jewett LS: Commitment to teaching: Health Professions Education. San Francisco, Whitman NA: There Is No Gene for Good Teaching: A
Myth or reality? South Med J 76:910, 1983. JosseyBass, 1983. Handbook on Lecturing for Medical Teachers. Salt
Greene NM: Anesthesiology and the University. Phila- McKeachie WJ: Teaching Tips: A Guidebook for the Lake City, University of Utah, 1982.
delphia, JB Lippincott, 1975. Beginning College Teacher, 7th ed. Lexington, MA, Whitman NA, Schwenk TL: A Handbook for Group
Groopman J: How Doctors Think. New York, Houghton DC Heath, 1978. Discussion Leaders: Alternative to Lecturing
Mifflin, 2007. Miller GE: Adventure in pedagogy. JAMA 162:1448, Medical Students to Death. Salt Lake City, Univer-
Jason H, Westberg J: Instructional DecisionMaking 1956. sity of Utah, 1983.
SelfStudy Modules for Teachers in the Health Pro- Miller GE (ed): Teaching and Learning in Medical Whitman NA, Schwenk TL: Preceptors As Teachers: A
fessions (Preview Package). Miami, National School. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, Guide to Clinical Teaching. Salt Lake City, Univer-
Center for Faculty Development, University of 1961. sity of Utah, 1984.
Miami School of Medicine, 1980. Miller GE: Educating Medical Teachers. Cambridge,
Joyce B, Weil M: Models of Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, MA, Harvard University Press, 1980.
NJ, PrenticeHall, 1980.

1 Schwartz AJ, Ellison N, Ominsky AJ, et al: cialties, 2007. and Education Directory 2007-2008, 35th ed.
Advanced CPR: Student, teacher, administrator, 6. 2007 Annual Review. Evanston, IL, American Chicago, American Medical Association, 2007.
researcher. Anesth Analg 61:629, 1982. Board of Medical Specialties, 2007. 11. DoniniLenhoff F (ed): Health Professions Educa-
2. Department of Labor: Dictionary of Occupational 7. ACGME Institutional Review: Available at http:// tion Data Book 2007-2008. Chicago, American
Titles, 4th ed, Rev 1991. Available at http://www. www.acgme.org/acWebsite/navPages/nav_IRC.asp. Medical Association, 2007.
oalj.dol.gov/PUBLIC/D OT/REFERENCES/ Accessed Nov 5, 2007. 12. Brotherton SE, Etzel SI: Graduate Medical Educa-
DOT01B.HTM U.S. Accessed Nov 18, 2007. 8. ACGME Anesthesiology Program Requirements: tion, 2006-2007. JAMA 298:1081, 2007.
3. Knowles M: The Adult Learner: A Neglected Available at http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/ 13. Warner MA: Residency Review Committee for
Species. Houston, Gulf Publishing, 1978. RRC_040/040_prIndex.asp. Accessed Nov 5, 2007. Anesthesiology. ASA Newsl 71:26, 2007.
4. Booklet of Information. The American Board of 9. Rockoff MA, Hall SC: Subspecialty training in 14. Schubert A: National Resident Matching Program
Anesthesiology, Raleigh, NC, March 2007. pediatric anesthesiology: What does it mean? Results for 2007: Recruitment maintains all-time
5. 2007 Reference Handbook and Certificate Statis- Anesth Analg 85:1185, 1997. high for specialty of anesthesiology. Am Soc Anes-
tics. Evanston, IL, American Board of Medical Spe- 10. DoniniLenhoff F (ed): Health Professions Career thesiol Newsl 71:17, 2007. A
I 226

15. 2007 Anesthesiology Resident Class Sizes and 2002. on Pulmonary Artery Catheterization: Practice
Graduation Rates: Available at http://www.asahq. 29. Silber JH, Williams SV, Krakauer H, et al: Hospital guidelines for pulmonary artery catheterization.
org/Newsletters/2007/12-07/schubert1207.html. and patient characteristics associated with death Anesthesiology 78:380, 1993.
Accessed Dec 29, 2007. after surgery. Med Care 30:615, 1992. 44. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force
16. Martini CJM: Evaluating the competence of health 30. Dubin SA, Jense HG, Yodlowski E, et al: Continu- on Management of the Difficult Airway: Practice
professionals. JAMA 260:1057, 1988. ous quality improvement in an anesthesia residency guidelines for management of the difficult airway.
17. Langsley DG: Medical competence and perfor- training program. Int Anesthesiol Clin 30:29, 1992. Anesthesiology 78:597, 1993.
mance assessment: A new era. JAMA 266:977, 31. Schisler JQ: Implementing continuous, quality 45. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force
1991. improvement: A private practices experience. Int on Pain Management: Practice guidelines for acute
18. Singer I (ed): Physician Competence: Whose Anesthesiol Clin 30:45, 1992 pain management in the perioperative setting.
Responsibility? Conference Proceedings. Chicago, 32. Barzansky B, Etzel SI: Medical Schools in the Anesthesiology 82:1071, 1995.
American Medical Association, 1989. United States 2006-2007. JAMA 298:1071, 2007. 46. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force
19. American Board of Medical Specialties: Who we 33. Ratzan RM: On teachers. N Engl J Med 306:1420, on Blood Component Therapy: Practice guidelines
are and what we do. Available at http://www.abms. 1982. for blood component therapy. Anesthesiology
org/About_ABMS/who_we_are.aspx. Accessed 34. Jason H, Westberg J: Teachers and Teaching in U.S. 84:732, 1996.
Nov 26, 2007. Medical Schools. East Norwalk, CT, Appleton & 47. Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS, Masia BB: Taxonomy of
20. Epstein RM: The American Board of Anesthesiol- Lange, 1982. Educational Objectives. Handbook. II: Affective
ogy: Thoughts on the occasion of its fiftieth anni- 35. Mattern WD, Weinholtz D, Friedman CP: The Domain. New York, David McKay, 1964.
versary. J Clin Anesth 2:3, 1990. attending physician as teacher. N Engl J Med 48. Schwartz AJ, Blank LL, Horrow JC, et al: Are anes-
21. American Board of Anesthesiology: Continued 308:1129, 1983. thesiology residents educated to be professionals?
demonstration of qualifications for board-certified 36. Tyler RW: Basic Principles of Curriculum and Anesthesiology 87:A950, 1997.
anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 73:770, 1990. Instruction. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 49. Good ML, Gravenstein JS: Training for safety in an
22. Glass DD: Time-limited certification: American 1949. anesthesia simulator. Semin Anesth 12:235, 1993.
Board of Anesthesiology. Anesthesiology 83:413, 37. Dewey J: Democracy and Education. New York, 50. Latif R, Loyd GE, Henson L: Anesthesiology and
1995. Macmillan, 1916. medical simulation: Past, present and future. AUA
23. Clark AJM: Continuing medical education is as 38. American Board of Anesthesiology, American Newsletter, Winter 2007. Available at http://www.
important as patient care [editorial]. Can J Anaesth Society of Anesthesiologists: Content Outline. Joint auahq.org/Winter2007.pdf. Accessed Dec 25, 2007.
39:637, 1992. Council on InTraining Examinations. American 51. Euliano T, Good ML: Simulator training in anes-
24. CMA Policy Summary: Maintenance of compe- Board thesia growing rapidly. J Clin Monit 13:53, 1997.
tence. Can Med Assoc J 46:264A, 1992. of Anesthesiology Examination Part I. Revised 52. Murray DJ, Boulet JR, Avidan M, et al: Performance
25. American Board of Anesthesiology: Maintenance September 2006. Available at http://www.asahq. of residents and anesthesiologists in a simulation-
of Certification in Anesthesiology. Available at org/publicationsAndServices/ContentOutli- based skill assessment. Anesthesiology 107:705,
http://www.theaba.org/anesthesiology-mainte- neREV2006.pdf. Accessed Dec 3, 2007. 2007.
nance.shtml#components. Accessed Dec 25, 2007. 39. Bloom BS (ed): Taxonomy of Educational Objec- 53. Weinger MB: Experience expertise. Can simula-
26. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Edu- tives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, tion be used to tell the difference? Anesthesiology
cation: Outcome Project. Available at http://www. David McKay, 1956. 107:691, 2007.
acgme.org/Outcome/. Accessed Dec 26, 2007. 40. Woolf SH: Practice guidelines: A new reality in 54. Foley RP, Smilansky J: Teaching Techniques. A
27. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Edu- medicine. I. Recent developments. Arch Intern Handbook for Health Professionals. New York,
cation: Common Program Requirements: General Med 150:1811, 1990. McGrawHill, 1980.
Competencies. Available at http://www.acgme.org/ 41. Woolf SH: Practice guidelines: A new reality in 55. Gawande A: Complications: A Surgeons Notes on
outcome/comp/GeneralCompetenciesStandards medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. an Imperfect Science. New York, Metropolitan
21307.pdf. Accessed Dec 24, 2007. Arch Intern Med 152:946, 1992. Books, 2002.
28. Schwartz AJ: Innovation in medical education: The 42. Arens JF: A practice parameters overview [edito- 56. Campbell DT, Stanley JC: Experimental and Quasi-
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical rial]. Anesthesiology 78:229, 1993. experimental Designs for Research. Boston,
Outcome Project. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 15:659, 43. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force Houghton Mifflin, 1963.

: (), -
-
13 2007 .

,
- , -
(ACGME): ,
-
, .. - .
, ,
:
. ,
.
.
, - .
, , ,
, . ,
- .

.

A
227 8

, , .
, -
. .
.
. ,
, , - .
,
. , , -
, ,
- , , , , -
, - .

, . -

I
, , ,
- ,
. . :
, - -
. ,
- ;

. ;
-
. ;
,
. ;

- , -
- ;
. -
.

http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/GeneralCompetenciesStandards21307.pdf

I. ; .
. 15.
1. .
. . .
2. . 1. .
. , 2. .
1. . 3. .
2. . . .
3. , . 1. .
4. . 2. .
5. . 3. .
6. 4. .
. 5. .
7. / II. .
. . .
8. . 1.
9. . .
10. . 2. .
11. . 3. .
12. . 4. .
13. . 5. .
14. , - 6. (, , ).

A
I 228

7. . . .
8. . . .
III. . .
( , , . .
, ). . .
. . . , , , .
. - . . .
. . . .
. - /. . .
. / . V. .
. /. . .
. . . .
. . . .
IV. . . .
. . . , --
. . .
. .

American Board of Anesthesiology, American Society of Anesthesiologists Joint Council on InTraining


Examinations: American Board of Anesthesiology Examination Part I. RevisedSeptember 200638

A
Gail A. Van Norman Stanley H. Rosenbaum
..
..


1. 7.

, , ,
.
2. , .
, 8.
. ,
. . ,
3. ,
, .
, 9. ,
. , (1) , (2)
4. , (3)
, . .
5. 10. ,

, ,
.
(,
6.
,

).
.

, ,
. , -
, ,
.
,
- - -
. .
, -
,
. . -
, ,

. . (

?), ,
. ,
, -
, ? ,
-
, ? , ,
, -
. , ?
,
, , - , -

229
I 230

, , ,
. , ,
, .2 1957 . -
( ), - Salgo
, , ,
, - , -
. , - ;
. ,
.3
, ,
. , ,
-
.
.
, - ,
. -
- .

.
, -
, , .
- (. competence) -
. , -
, - (. capacity),
, -
. .
,
- .
. , , , -
- , . ,
(), , -
- - ,
, -
. , -
. ,
, - ,
, . ,
.1 ,
-
, - . -
, .
- -
(. beneficence) . . -
-
. . - ,
. .
,
-
.
,
.
,
,
- -
- .4 ,
.
(. autonomy) -
- , .
, , -
.1
, ,
, . , 30% .5
- , ,
- -
. 1914. Schloendorff -
A , .6
231 9
.7
- , ,
. , -
, -
. . ,
,
,
. .
?
- -
.
: (1) -
; (2) .
, ; (3) -
, , ,
,

I
; (4) ,
, ,
, ? .

,
. - -
, - -
.
. , ,
,
- . (. closed
. claims database)
(ASA) ,
1%

. .8 -
,
:
. , .9
, ,
, , ,
, , -
. .
,

.
, ,
, - ,
, .
, ,
, ,
. -
, . , -
; -
- (DNAR, . do-not-attempt-resus-
. , - citation) ; ,
, (1) , ,
, , ,
, (2) ( ; ,
) , ,
( ). () .
,
*, , - , .
,
. ,
- ,
,
* . therapeutic privilege; therapeu- ,
tic exception,
.
,
(. . . .) - A
I 232

, , -
. .
,
,
,
, ,
. ,
,
, ( . . 82)
. - , . -
. , -
, ,
, ,
.
,
.
, -
,
- ( 18 ), -
, -
, .
, , , ,
( . .
. 5 6). -
, - .
, - ,
. ,
, ,
, 14- ,
. , . -
, ,
, , , ,
. , -
.12
-
- , ,
, , -- ,
. -

.10 , - , ,
, , -
, -
. - . ,
- , ,
,
() 1980- . -
-
.
, - . , -
, ,
,
- - , ,
, ,
. , , . , -
,
, - ,
, .11 .
-
,
, - . , -
. ,
- - .13 -
, , -
, ,
. , ,
A ,
233 9
, - ,
, . , -
, , - . ,
, - ,
( ).
,
.14 ,
, .23
,
.
, , , , -
,
. .
-
, , , .
/ ,

I
.14,15 ,
. -
:
.
- -
(. . 69 101), -
, ,
, -
- , ,
-
. .24
-
,
, ,
.
, ,
,
, ( . . 69). -
.16
- , -
. ,
, - . -
.17 - , -
, ,
- , .
, . ,
, , ,
. , -
, .25 ,
, . -
, -
, , , ,
, .18 - ,
- .

.19 , , ,
- , :
, (1) , (2)
. , , (3)
, , - .26
, -

.20,21 ,
-, , - .27
,
.22

, -
.23 -
A
I 234

1947-1949 .*, ,
(. ,
. 71).28 ,
,
. .30
-
. - -
, ,
, , , ,
, - -
. . , -
, - ,
, , -
, , - , .
.
, - ,
.
.29
- , -
: (1) - ,
.
?
, -
? (2) -
? (3)
? (4)

? ,
,
- , -
. - . -
, , ,

, - -
. , , -
, ,
, , .31 -
, - ,
, , ,
. , ,
, . - , .
( ) ,
, , -
. ,
-
. , - .
, , ,
, -,
, ( ,
, - . durable power of attorney, . ),
. -
, .
, -
, , - , -
, .
, . -
, , , , ,
, -
, - , ,
. - .
-
, - , , -
.
* 23-
-
, . ,

A (. . . .) -
235 9
. ,
, , ,
, , , -
, . , .
,
, , , ,
, - ,
-, - , .
. ASA
-
, , ,
, , , - 11. , -
. , , -
, ,
,
, - ,

I
. .
, , : (1) ,
, -
, , ; (2) , -
.
, - ; (3) -
- (4) -
,
. - , , , -
- , . -
, ,
. , , , -
- .
- , -
.32-34 , , -
, - , .
, -
. -

, ,
, .
,
, , ,
, , -
. - . ,
,
, , .
.
. ,
, . -
, , (. conscientious
(1) , objectors) .
(2) , (3) -
. , -
(4) , - ,
. -

,
, .

60% , - , -
(DNAR) -
(
. . 97). 11, - , , -
35, .
36 -
37 - ,
, - ,
, , -
. .38 A
I 236

,
, -
. . ,
- ,
. , - .
, , -
, -
, ,
, - -
. .
/
.


1996 . (. end-of-life care).
, . -
; ,
, , , - , -
; - ,
; , ,
.39,40
, -
/ ,
.45 , -
80% ,
, ,
.40 .
, - -
-
. , ,
, , -
,
. .
. -
. , .
( , ,
) () , , ,
. , ,
, - .
- , ,
. 1976 . Karen Ann -
Quinlan41 , - , ,
, ,
, , , , ,
.46
, , -
. -
Claire Convoy ,
Nancy Cruzan , - ,
- , .
,
, .31 . , -
- ,
Theresa Schiavo 2005.42
, -
, (). -
, - -
- ,
(, , .47 ,
) (, - ,
).43 .

, - . , -
,
.44 , ,
A , , , -
237 9
, .
- :
,
, -
. -
-
, .47 , ,
, - -
-
.
, - (
. , (. donation after cardiac death, . DCD)).
,
, . -
, 1960-. , -
,

I
. , - . - -

.46 , , . 1968 .
(. physician-
assisted suicide, . PAS) - , -
-
. PAS -
, ( ).48
. - .
-, , - -
, , -
( ,
). , ,
.
. .
,
. - ,
, , ,
, , , . . -

. - , -
, -
.
.
PAS , . ,
- , ,
, - ,
. , ,
, . -
, ,
, , -
- . , , -
PAS , - .
,
- . , , ,
, . ,
, ,
-
, -
. .
, , , -
- ,
- ,
. .
PAS - ,
, , -
, -
, ,
, , . -
, . - , A
I 238

,
.
, . -
, DCD, -

DCD , - , ,
.

. ,
,
.

-
,
.
.
-

.
, ,
, , -
. ,
DCD .
1997.49 2000.50 , - ,
, , , -
.
- , -
, - .
. I
, ,
, , , -
, , .
DCD , .
DCD, ,
,
, ,
; , , .
DCD , -
, , ,

.51-53 -
, , .
, ,
. , - , ,
.
2 ,

, ,
.54 , - .
, -
, - , -
-
. .56 , -
, Fox57 Beecher58 -
, , ,
; , -
DCD, , , . 1974. -

.55 -
, -
DCD , , - .31

, . :
, (1)
, (2)
, -
A DCD. ,
239 9
(3) .
, , ,
, - , ,
. .60
-
, , , ,
, ,
.
, 7
. ,
, -
. , ,
.60,61
. ,
,
,

I
.
, - -
, 25 , -
,
, ,
.56
- .
, , ,
. - 1966 . 1985 .
-

. - ,
, , , ; -
, -
, ;
. ,
, ;
, - .62
, , , - , -
. -
, ,
.
. - .
, - -
.
, ,
, ,
, .
. .
-
, - ,
, - , ,
- , , , -
.47 , , -
- , . ,
, -
. , - , -
, .63,64
, ,
. -
, -
,
- . ,
, - , -
, , - , ,
, , ,
, - , .65
, ,
.59
, - . A
I 240

R replacement (), reduction


() refinement (), ..

, ,
, -
, .

- *?
-
.
,
. -
.65 ,
?
-
.
, -
,
,
, - -
, , - -
. .69
,
- DNAR
, , - , .11
. - . -
, , ,
. ,
, , , -
, - ,
, - , . ,
, , ,
; -
- , ,
.
,
, .69
-
, ,
,
,
.66
,
, , ,
.
,
. , - , -
.67
, , - . -
, -
, ,
, -
, - . -
, , , - ,
, , , . -
- ,
.68 - ,

.
,
. * (. consci-
entious objector) (. . . .)


A Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.
241 9

1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: The concept of auton- survey of current practice. J Clin Anesth 9:546-550, guidelines on the withdrawal of life-sustaining
omy. In Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford, 1997. therapies. Int Anesthesiol Clin 39:87-102, 2001.
Oxford University Press, 1994, p 120. 24. Practice Advisory for Preanesthesia Evaluation. 47. Lowenstein E (ed): Medical ethics. Int Anesthesiol
2. Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital, 311 ASA Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation, Clin 39(3), 2001.
NY 125, 127, 129; 105 NE 92, 93, 1914. Revised. Park Ridge, IL, American Society of Anes- 48. A definition of irreversible coma: A report of the ad
3. Salgo v Trustees of Leland Stanford Hospital, 154 thesiologists, 2003. hoc committee of the Harvard School of Medicine
Col App 2d 560,317 P2d 170 Ct Appl, 1957. 25. Harris LH, Paltrow L: The status of pregnant to examine the definition of brain death. JAMA
4. Mebane AH, Rauch HB: When do physicians women and fetuses in US criminal law. JAMA 205:337-340, 1968.
request competency evaluations? Psychosomatics 289:1697-1699, 2003. 49. Herdman R, Potts J: Non Heart Beating Organ
31:40-46, 1990. 26. Fetal therapyethical considerations. American Transplantation: Medical and Ethical Issues in Pro
5. Hamel MB, Teno JM, Goldman L, et al: Patient age Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. curement, a Report of the Institute of Medicine.
and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treat- Pediatrics 103:1061-1063, 1999. Washington. DC, National Academy of Sciences,
ments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. Ann 27. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecolo- 1997.
Intern Med 130:116-125, 1999. gists: Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2nd ed. 50. Cassel C, Allee M, Beasley C, et al: NonHeart
6. Madorsky J: Is the slippery slope steeper for people American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beating Organ Transplantation: Practice and Pro-
with disabilities? West J Med 166:410-411, 1997. Washington, DC, 2004, pp 34-36.
tocols, a Report of the Committee on NonHeart-
7. Kain ZN: Perioperative information and parental 28. Shuster E: Fifty years later: The significance of the

I
Beating Transplantation II, Institute of Medicine.
anxiety: The next generation. Anesth Analg 88:237- Nuremberg Code. N Engl J Med 337:1436-1440,
Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences,
239, 1999. 1997.
2000.
8. Caplan RA, Posner KL: Informed consent in anes- 29. Clarke JR, Sorenson JH, Hare JE: The limits of
51. Menikoff J: The importance of being dead: Non-
thesia liability. ASA Newsl 59:9-12, 1995. paternalism in emergency care. Hastings Center
heart beating organ donation. Issues Law Med 18:3-
9. Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel Rep 10(6):20-22, 1980.
20, 2002.
RM: The doctor-patient relationship and malprac- 30. Krugman RD, Bays J, Chadwick DL, et al: Behavior
52. DuBois J: Non-heart-beating organ donation: A
tice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch management of pediatric dental patients [letter].
Pediatrics 90:651-652, 1992. defense of the required determination of death. J
Intern Med 154:1365-1370, 1995.
10. Elder L: Coagulopathy after cardiopulmonary 31. Jonsen A, Beatch R, Walters L: Source Book in Bio- Law Med Ethics 27:126-136, 1999.
bypass in Jehovahs Witness patients: Management ethics: A Documentary History. Washington, DC, 53. Youngner S, Arnold R, DeVita M: When is dead?
of and for the individual rather than the religious Georgetown University Press, 1998. Hastings Center Rep 29:14-21, 1999.
institution. Anesth Analg 104:757-758, 2007. 32. Layde P, Beam C, Broste S, et al: Surrogates 54. Stein R: New trend in organ donation raises ques-
11. Ethical Guidelines for the Anesthesia Care of predictions of seriously ill patients resuscitation tions. The Washington Post, March 18, 2007.
Patients with DoNot-Resuscitate Orders or Other preferences. Arch Family Med 4:518-523, 1995. 55. Van Norman G: A matter of life and death: What
Directives That Limit Treatment. Park Ridge, IL, 33. Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, et al: Communica- every anesthesiologist should know about the
American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2001. tion and decision-making in seriously ill patients: medical, legal, and ethical aspects of declaring
12. Lewis CE, Lewis MA, Ifekwunigue M: Informed Findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to brain death. Anesthesiology 91:275-287, 1999.
consent by children and participation in an influ- Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Out- 56. Lerner BH: Subjects or objects? Prisoners and
enza vaccine trial. Am J Public Health 68:1079- comes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc human experimentation. N Engl J Med 356:1806-
1082, 1978. 48(5 Suppl):S187-S193, 2000. 1807, 2007.
13. Mutcherson KM: Whose body is it anyway? An 34. Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB, et al: Patient 57. Final report of the Advisory Committee on Human
updated model of healthcare decision-making preferences for communication with physicians Radiation Experiments. Washington, DC, Govern-
rights for adolescents. Cornell J Law Public Policy about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investiga- ment Printing Office, 1995.
14:251-325, 2005. tors. Study to Understand Prognoses and Prefer- 58. Beecher H: Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J
14. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent ence for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Med 74:1354, 1966.
in pediatric practice. Committee on Bioethics, Intern Med 127:1-12, 1997. 59. Brody JL, Scherer DG, Annett RD, PearsonBish
American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 35. American College of Surgeons: Statement on M: Voluntary assent in biomedical research with
95:314-317, 1995. advance directives by patients; do not resuscitate in adolescents: A comparison of parent and adoles-
15. Komer A, Clayton EW: Informed consent, parental the operating room. ACS Bull 79(9):29, 1994. cent views. Ethics Behav 13:79-95, 2003.
permission and assent in pediatric practice. Pediat- 36. AORN Position Statement: Perioperative Care of 60. Olechnowicz JQ, Eder M, Simon C, et al: Assent
rics 95:314-317, 1995. Patients with DoNot-Resuscitate Orders. Denver, observed: Childrens involvement in leukemia
16. Chapman K, Meadow J, Catalan J, Gassard B: CO, Association of Operating Room Nurses, 1995. treatment and research discussion. Pediatrics
Testing patients for HIV before surgery: The views 37. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare 109:806-814, 2002.
of doctors performing surgery. AIDS Care 7:125- Organizations: Patient rights. In Manual of the Joint 61. Wendler DS: Assent in paediatric research: Theo-
128, 1995. Commission on Accreditation of Health Care retical and practical considerations. J Med Ethics
17. Lawrence VA, Gafni A, Kroenke K: Preoperative Organizations. Chicago, JCAHO, 1994.
32:229-234, 2006.
HIV testing: Is it less expensive than universal pre- 38. Osgood v Genesys Regional Medical Center, Mich,
62. Shapiro H: Animal rights and biomedical research:
cautions? J Clin Epidemiol 46:1219-1227, 1993. No. 94-26731-NH, Circuit Ct for Genesee County.
No place for complacency. Anesthesiology 64:142-
18. Lester P, Partridge JC, Cheesny MA, Cooke M: The 39. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical
146, 1986.
consequences of a positive prenatal HIV antibody Association: Good care of the dying patient. JAMA
63. Francione GL: The use of nonhuman animals in
test for women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum 275:474-478, 1996.
biomedical research: Necessity and justification. J
Retrovirol 10:341-349, 1995. 40. Karlawish J: Managing death and dying in the
Law Med Ethics 35:241-248, 2007.
19. Chapman K, Meadow J, Catalan J, Gassard B: intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
64. Pluhar EB: Experimentation on humans and non-
Testing patients for HIV before surgery: The views 155:1-2, 1997.
41. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan, an Alleged Incom- humans. Theor Med Bioeth 27:333-355, 2006.
of doctors performing surgery. AIDS Care 7:125-
128, 1995. petent, 355 A2d 647, NJ Super Ct Cir 1976. 65. Martin J: The rights of man and animal experimen-
20. Mazze RI, Kallen B: Reproductive outcomes after 42. Schiavo v. Schiavo, No. 05-11628, 11th Cir, March tation. J Med Ethics 16:160-161, 1990.
anesthesia and operation during pregnancy: A reg- 25, 2005. 66. Krass ME: How coercive is the medical profession?
istry study of 5405 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 43. Childress J: Non-heart-beating donors of organs. Can Med Assoc J 119:1340-1344, 1978.
161:1178-1185, 1989. Are the distinctions between direct and indirect 67. Harmon TR, Lofquist WS: Too late for luck: A com-
21. Reedy MB, Klln, B, Kuehl TJ: Laparoscopy effects and between killing and letting die relevant parison of post-Furman exonerations and execu-
during pregnancy: A study of five fetal outcome and helpful? Kennedy Inst Ethics J 3:203-216, 1993. tions of the innocent. Crime Delinquency
parameters with use of the Swedish Health Regis- 44. Jonsen A, Siegler M, Winslade W: Clinical Ethics, 51:498-520, 2005.
try. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:673-679, 1997. 3rd ed. New York, McGrawHill, 1992. 68. Osofsky MJ, Bandura A, Zimbardo PG: The role of
22. Malviya S, Derrico C, Reynolds P, et al: Should 45. Blank L: Defining and evaluating physician compe- moral disengagement in the execution process. Law
pregnancy testing be routine in adolescent patients tence in end-of-life patient care: A matter of aware- Hum Behav 29:371-393, 2005.
prior to surgery? Anesth Analg 83:854-858, 1996. ness and emphasis. West J Med 163:297-301, 1995. 69. Wicclair M: Conscientious objection in medicine.
23. Kempen PM: Preoperative pregnancy testing: A 46. Cist A, Truog R, Brackett S, Hurford W: Practical Bioethics 14:205-227, 2000.

A
David B. Waisel
..
..


10


1.
,
. , ,
2. , ,
.
9.
. ,
3. , ,
. ,
.
4. ,
, 10. ,
, , , , , ,
, . ,
, ,
5. ,
.
.
11.
6. ,


.
.
12. ,
7.



.
-
8. .
(
13.
)
.
,
, ,

, -
,
(. 10-1).1-8 - ,
, - .
. , ,
, - . -,
, ,

.
.
,
, .
. , ,
,

, , , , -
.
, -
*, . , .
,
*
(. . . .) ,

243
I 244

. 10-1 ,


, , . ,
,
(HIPAA)1 , ,
, .
, ,
. HIPPA , ,
.

EMTALA ,
. , EMTALA
.
(EMTALA)2,3 , , , ,
,
, , ,
, , .
. ,
, . EMTALA
, .

, ,
4 , .
,
. .

ERISA , .
ERISA, .
(ERISA)5 ( , . ERISA
ERISA , ,
.6-8
,
HIPAA)

, . 10-2 ,
.9

-
, ,
. , -
- , ,
, .
Medicare, ,
-
.10

,
1

,
, - ,
,
. , -

.11 .
, -
.11 -

.
-
-, , , -
, - : White C, Rosoff AJ, LeBlang TR: Informed consent to medical and surgical
A .12,13 ,
treatment. In Sanbar AA, Firestone MH, Fiscina S, et al (eds): Legal Medicine, 7th ed.
Philadelphia, Mosby Elsevier, 2007, pp 337-343
245 10
,
,
. .
-
.
-
, ,
- , .18
(. 10-2).
, - , .
. 14 , , , -
, , .
()
() , ,
( ) () , -
. , ( , -

I
).
- . .
,
, , - -
. - , . -
,
, - . -
. , .
, , -
, , -
.
, , -
- , ,
. , - .
. .
, - . -
- - , -
. , , .
, - ,
,
, -
. , .
-
, -
,
( ),
( ).15 , -
, , , , ,
, , , , -
, , .19
, , ,
, - -
. , - .
( ) ,
, , -
, -
, .16 .
- , -,
. , , , , ,
.
.17 - -

- .20
-
-, -
- , ,
. -
. - , , ,
, , ,
. . - A
I 246


10-1 -
. ,



, ,
. , ,
.24

. . -
, -


,
.
,
. 0
, , .
. -

, 30
,
.

,
, .
,
, ,
, ( )
, .
, ( 10-2).25,26
, -
, ,
. , .27
-
,
, .
.
,

.
, ,
. -
, ,

.

.
.
, -
-
. .19
-
ASA. http://www.asahq.org/publica- . , ,
tionsAndServices/standards/07.pdf. 1 2007 .
.
-
: - , ,
, , -
. , . -
, , ,
- . , 6-
- ,
( 10-1).21 . ,
, , , -
.22 .
,
, - ( , ),
, , ,
.23 ( .
, ,
.22 ),
, ( -
. ). ,
,
, , ,
, . - .
- ,
A , . .
247 10
. , , -
10-2
,

. -
,
(, ,
.
, )
-
. , ,

( ( ), -
)
- ( . ,
(,
, , ,
, , )
.
ASA ,
). ,

I
, , ,
, -
.
,
, ,
, -

. , ,

, -
/ .
( ) . -
c ,
, , , -

, . -
, .28
-
, , , -
.
,
,
,
,
.

. ,
, , -
, , -
.
, ,

,
. -

.



,
,

, 1950- .
.
1957 . Salgo

-
.
23-25 , -
, -
,
, , - , -
. -
29
. -
, -
-, , , - . A
I 248

, ,
. ,
- .
, - ,
, . .
-
. , -
,
.
, -
, .
, -
- . Shain Vega -
- .32 1990 . ,
. , -
- -
, , , . ,
, ,
, , .
, (
, )
. .
. - ,
, .
. ,
, . -
. , - , , -
, .
,
.
- ,
.30 - .
,
. .
, -
, , -
- ,
. -
, - , ,
. -
, , .
. , - , -
, , - ,
, -
. , - .
, - , -
, -
- ,
. -
, , , .33
, - -
, -
. .
, , -
,
, .
, ,
31. .33


- ,
, . - , , ,
. -
. ,

A .
249 10
1972 . , , ,
, .37,38
, - ,
, , - ,
.34,35 .39-41


, -
.31 - .
, -
, ,
, .
, . ,
, , . -
, , , , -
. -

I
, .
-
, ,
,
.
, .
.36 ,
, - ,
, - . ,
, ,
, - ,
(
. ), -

, - ,
, .42 , , -
, ,
, ,
. - .
, , ,
, - .
, -
, - . ,
, , , -
, , ,
.34 .
. ,
-
, , -
. , , -
, .
, -
; , .
.


,
, -
.
, , -
,
, .
, - . -
. ,
, ,
, . ,
-
, .
. , - .
- , , A
I 250

- .
. , -
, - , , ,
. , , -
- . -
. ,
,
, . .
- , -
- .
, - ,
. .
-
, ,
, , . -
, ,
-
.
, - , ,
, , - ,
, , . , -
, ,
,
.
.31 ,
, -
. ,
. -
,

-
. , , ,
, - -
.31 .
, , -
, (. . 91 98). 1974 . -
, , -
.
, . -
, , .44 ,
. -
, , -
, , .45
. , -
. -
, - . Karen Ann Quinlan
, , 1976 . -
. . -
-
, .46
,
. - .
. - , ,
,
, , .
. , -
. 10 ,
.
-
-
, 1984 . Bartling .47
-
, - 6 -
.43 .
, - -
. , -.
A - , .
251 10
.
1990 ., -
: , .52
, ,
47 , , , -
, -
, - . 2
, :
( -
. ). -
1990 . Cruzan -
,
, , - ,
.48 . -
-
, -

I
. ,
,

.
,
. - ( .. ),
.49 ,
- . -
, -
14- , , . ,
- , ,
,
; .53
, ,
( -
, ).
-
.48,50
- ,
.51 - ,
.54,55
- , , -
. , - . , -
,
. - , .56
, ,
, , ,
. - ,
, .
,
. .

, - ,
. , .
, -
, -
, , -
.

, , . ,
. ,
-
, -
.

- , ,
,
. - .57
, -
- . - A
I 252

.
, , , -
. -
, - ,
. ,
. .61
,
, -
. , -
, , ,
.
, .62
, ,
.
,

. , -
-
.
Glucksberg63 Vacco Quill64 ,

. ,
,
, ,
- ,
, .
, .
, , ,
, , , .65
. - 1997 .
, Helga Wanglie, 86- ,
, -
. .
, - , -
- . 1998 2006 . 292
. 456 ,
- . , -
, , -
. (81% ),
, (8% )
.58,59 (4% ).66
Gilgunn 1995 . 2006 . 40 65 . 65 -
35 , 19
. 11 .66
, , ,
, .60 , - .
, , .

, -
,
.

, ,
. -

. -
- , -
. . , -
, - , ,
- (. . 55).67
. -
, , -
, .
. , , -
-
. , -
A , .
253 10
, , , -
. - . , 2007 . -
- , 14-
cell saver,
, - , 70% 5- -
. - . 69.
,
,
. , -
, -
,
. - . -
,
. -
, , .
;

I
. , - .
,
, , , , ,
. ,
.70,71
. - -
,
, - . -
. -
,
, , -
, . , -
.72,73 ,
, ,

. ,
,
,
, .
, - ,
( , 18 ) .74
(. . 82 84).
, , -
, . - . , ,
, , ,
,
,
.
, .
- , -
.68
18 , .75,76 ,
. - , -
, , , - ,
, , ,
, , -
. -
, - . ,
, ,
- ,
,
. , . , -
, , ,
14- -
. . ,
, ,
. -
- . ,
, . ,
, , A
I 254

, .
. , ,
. -
, ,
- .

,
*. , .83
,
, -
, ,
. .84 -
, .
, , -
, - .85 -
. , - ,
.
, , -
, . ,
.77 ,
, . , -
,
, , - .
-
- . -
.78 - ,
-
.
-.
, - .
-, , - -
, , , ,86
, ,
. - .
.
,
, , , , , -
, ,

. , -
- , , -
, , -
- -
.78 -
, , (. . 58 57).87,88 ,
- -
- ,
.79,80
(, . ,
)
, -
-. - . ,
, ,
, - ,
. - .88
,
( ASA) , ,
. 0,06% ,
0,05% 0,01%
, .89 0,06%
- ,
, , . ,
.81,82 ,
, , , -
.
*
A (. . . .) .
255 10
. 10-3

.
:
(NDPB)93 ,
,
,
93 Medicare dicaid,
.



(HIPDB)94


,
(FSMB)95


95

Gonzales .91 -
, . -
.90
- -
,
2
, .90 .
,

,

.4 -
. , -
,
, - (. 10-3).93-95 1991
2004 .
. 276274
, 8297
.91,92 , 85- . -
1998 . , .96

1. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability 12. Brennan TA, Sox CM, Burstin HR: Relation LEXIS 171; 1999 Colo J CAR 3850.
Act of 1996, Public Law 104-191. between negligent adverse events and the outcomes 18. Balsamo RR, Brown MD: Risk management. In
2. 42 USC 1395. of medical-malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med Sanbar AA, Firestone MH, Fiscina S, et al (eds):
3. 42 CFR 489.24. 335:1963-1967, 1996. Legal Medicine, 7th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby Else-
4. 21 USC 811. 13. Cheney FW, Posner K, Caplan RA, Ward RJ: Stand- vier, 2007, pp 285-303.
5. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, ard of care and anesthesia liability. JAMA 261:1599- 19. Mehlman MJ: The shame of medical malpractice. J
Public Law 93-406. 1603, 1989. Leg Med 27:17-32, 2006.
6. Aetna Health v Davila, 02-1845. 14. Sanbar SS, Warner J: Medical malpractice overview. 20. Cohen FL: The expert medical witness in legal per-
7. Pegram v Herdrich, 530 US 211, 2000. In Sanbar AA, Firestone MH, Fiscina S, et al (eds): spective. J Leg Med 25:185-209, 2004.
8. DiFelice v Aetna U.S. Healthcare, No 02-3381, 3d Legal Medicine, 7th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby Else- 21. American Society of Anesthesiologists: Guidelines
Cir, Oct 15, 2003. vier, 2007, pp 253-264. for expert witness qualifications and testimony.
9. Colavito v New York Organ Donor Network, Inc, 15. Filkins JA: Criminalization of medical negligence. Available at http://www.asahq.org/publication-
860 NE2d 713, NY 2006. In Sanbar AA, Firestone MH, Fiscina S, et al (eds): sAndServices/standards/07.pdf. Accessed Novem-
10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 42 Legal Medicine, 7th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby Else- ber 1, 2007.
CFR 482. vier, 2007, pp 507-512. 22. Moses RE, Feld AD: Legal risks of clinical
11. Liang BA: Assessing medical malpractice jury ver- 16. Annas GJ: Medicine, death, and the criminal law. practice guidelines. Am J Gastroenterol 103:7-11,
dicts: A case study of an anesthesiology depart- N Engl J Med 333:527-530, 1995. 2008.
ment. Cornell J Law Public Policy 7:121-164, 1997. 17. People v. Verbrugge, 998 P2d 43; 1999 Colo App 23. Havighurst CC: Practice guidelines as legal stand- A
I 256

ards governing physician liability. Law Contemp resuscitate. N Engl J Med 295:364-366, 1976. Seattle PostIntelligencer, November 29, 2007.
Problems 54:87-117, 1991. 46. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan, 70 NJ 10,335 A2d 70. Committee on Adolescence, American Academy of
24. Liang BA, Ediale KR: Shouldering the evidence 647, cert denied, 429 US 922, 1976. Pediatrics: The adolescents right to confidential
burden: Conflicting testimony in a case of intersca- 47. Bartling v Superior Court, 163 Cal App3d 186 [209 care when considering abortion. Pediatrics 97:746-
lene block. J Clin Anesth 17:131-133, 2005. Cal Rptr 220], 1984. 751, 1996.
25. American Society of Anesthesiologists: Doc 48. Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health, 71. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American
umentation of anesthesia care (2003). Available at 110 SCt 2841, 1990. Medical Association: Mandatory parental consent
http://www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/ 49. Bioethicists statement on the U.S. Supreme Courts to abortion. JAMA 269:82-86, 1993.
standards/21.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2007. Cruzan decision. N Engl J Med 323:686-687, 1990. 72. Prince v Massachusetts, 321 US 158, 1994.
26. Canadian Anesthesiologists Society: Guidelines to 50. Emanuel EJ: Securing patients right to refuse 73. Custody of a Minor, 375 Mass 733,379 NE2d 1053,
the practice of anesthesia (2007). Available at medical care: In praise of the Cruzan decision. Am 1978.
http://www.cas.ca/members/sign_in/guidelines/ J Med 92: 307-312, 1992. 74. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of
practice_of_anesthesia. Accessed January 10, 2007. 51. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Pediatrics: Guidelines on forgoing life-sustaining
27. Lee BH: Countersuits by health care providers. In Medical Association: Decisions near the end of life. medical treatment. Pediatrics 93:532-536, 1994.
Sanbar AA, Firestone MH, Fiscina S, et al (eds): JAMA 267:2229-2233, 1992. 75. Sampson v. Taylor, 29 NY2d 900, 1972.
Legal Medicine, 7th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby Else- 52. Patient SelfDetermination Act of 1990Omnibus 76. Wallace v. Labrenz, 104 NE2d 769, 1952.
vier, 2007, pp 521-526. Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, Pub. L. No 77. Kachalia A, Studdert DM: Professional liability
28. Wojcieszak D, Saxton JW, Finkelstein MM: Sorry 101-508. issues in graduate medical education. JAMA
Works! Disclosure, Apology and Relationships 53. Shalowitz DI, GarrettMayer E, Wendler D: The 292:1051-1056, 2004.
Prevent Medical Malpractice Claims. Bloomington, accuracy of surrogate decision makers: A system- 78. Coalter JS: The vicarious liability of a physician for
IN, AuthorHouse, 2007. atic review. Arch Intern Med 166:493-497, 2006. the negligence of other medical professionals.
29. Salgo v Trustees of Leland Stanford Hospital, 154 54. Teno JM: Advance directives: Time to move on. Campbell Law Rev 17:375-381, 1995.
Col App 2d 560,317 P2d 170 Ct Appl, 1957. Ann Intern Med 141:159-160, 2004. 79. Doctors Hosp. of Augusta, Inc, v Bonner, 392 SE2d
30. Waisel DB, Truog RD: Informed consent. Anesthe- 55. Hammes BJ, Rooney BL: Death and end-of-life 897, GA App 1990.
siology 87:968-978, 1997. planning in one midwestern community. Arch 80. Liang BA, Hannenberg AA, Johans TG: Negligence
31. White C, Rosoff AJ, LeBlang TR: Informed consent Intern Med 158:383-390, 1998. in supervision: A case of failed resuscitation. J Clin
to medical and surgical treatment. In Sanbar AA, 56. Woien S: Conflicting preferences and advance Anesth 13:44-48, 2001.
Firestone MH, Fiscina S, et al (eds): Legal Medi- directives. Am J Bioeth 7:64-65; discussion 81. 42 CFR 482.52.
cine, 7th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby Elsevier, 2007, pp W4-W6, 2007. 82. 42 CFR 416.42.
337-343. 57. Truog RD, Waisel DB, Burns JP: DNR in the OR: A 83. 42 CFR 415.110.
32. Shine v Vega, 429 Mass 456,709 NE2d 58, 1999. goal-directed approach. Anesthesiology 90:289- 84. Liang BA, Katz RL: Professional association liability
33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecolo- 295, 1999. without personal malpractice: Just who can be
gists Committee on Ethics: Patient choice in the 58. In re the conservatorship of Helga M. Wanglie, liable? J Clin Anesth 16:54-56, 2004.
maternal-fetal relationship (2004). Available at No PX-91-283, District Probate Division, 4th 85. Kadlec Medical Center et al. v Lakeview Anesthesia
http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/ Judicial district of the County of Hennepin, State of Associates Interrogatories to the Jury, Civil Action
ethics/ethics034.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2007. Minnesota, 1993. No Civ A 04-0997, Section I/3, ED La, May 19,
34. Canterbury v Spence, 464 F2d 772, 1972. 59. Angell M: The case of Helga Wangliea new kind 2005.
35. Cobbs v Grant, 104 Cal Rptr 505,502 P2d 1, 1972. of right to die case. N Engl J Med 325:511-512, 86. 42 USC 126.
36. Johnson v Kokemoor, 545 NW2d 495,199 Wis 2d 1991. 87. Quill TE, Meier DE: The big chillinserting the
615, 1996. 60. Gilgunn v Massachusetts General Hospital, SCt Civ DEA into end-of-life care. N Engl J Med 354:1-3,
37. Byrne J, Napier A, Cuschieri A: How informed is Action No 92-4820, Suffolk Co, Mass, verdict April 2006.
signed consent? BMJ 296:839-840, 1988. 21, 1995. 88. Reddy BS: The epidemic of unrelieved chronic
38. Lloyd A, Hayes P, Bell PR, Naylor AR: The role of 61. Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care pain. The ethical, societal, and regulatory barriers
risk and benefit perception in informed consent for Medicines Ethics Committee regarding futile and facing opioid prescribing physicians. J Leg Med
surgery. Med Decis Making 21:141-149, 2001. other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care 27:427-442, 2006.
39. Affleck PJ, Waisel DB, Cusick JM, Van Decar T: Med 25:887-891, 1997. 89. The myth of the chilling effect. News release of
Recall of risks following labor epidural analgesia. J 62. Texas Advance Directive Act. Texas Health & Safety the Drug Enforcement Administration A, Va,
Clin Anesth 10:141-144, 1998. Code Section 166.046. October 30, 2003.
40. Jackson A, Henry R, Avery N, et al: Informed 63. Washington v Glucksberg, 521 US 702, 1997. 90. Gonzales v Oregon, 126 SCt 904, 2006.
consent for labour epidurals: What labouring 64. Vacco v Quill, 521 US 793, 1997. 91. Bergman v Wing Chin, MD, and Eden Medical
women want to know. Can J Anaesth 47:1068-1073, 65. Snyder L, Sulmasy DP: Physician-assisted suicide. Center, No H205732-1, Cal App Dept Super Ct,
2000. Ann Intern Med 135:209-216, 2001. 1999.
41. Swan HD, Borshoff DC: Informed consentrecall 66. Oregon Department of Human Services: Oregons 92. Estate of Henry James v Hillhaven Corp, 89 CVS
of risk information following epidural analgesia in Death with Dignity Act. Portland, OR, 2007. 64, NC SCt 1991.
labour. Anaesth Intensive Care 22:139-144, 1994. 67. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylva- 93. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986,
42. Truman v Thomas, 27 Cal, 3d 285,165 Cal Rptr 308, nia: How can blood save your life? Brooklyn, NY, as amended in 42 USC Sec 11101.
611 P2d 902, 1980. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, 94. 45 CFR 61.
43. Annas GJ: Protecting patients from discrimina- 1990. 95. Federation of State Medical Boards: FSMB mission,
tionthe Americans with Disabilities Act and HIV 68. Emancipation of Minors Law. California Family vision, core values and goals. Available at http://
infection. N Engl J Med 339:1255-1259, 1998. Code, Section 7000-7002. www.fsmb.org/candidates/edusvc_candidates_
44. Standards for cardiopulmonary resuscitation 69. Black C: Boys death ends battle because of his reli- mission.html. Accessed November 1, 2007.
(CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC). JAMA gion, leukemia patient Dennis Lindberg, 14, didnt 96. Kain ZN: The National Practitioner Data Bank and
227(Suppl):833-868, 1974. want vital transfusions; his biological parents did. anesthesia malpractice payments. Anesth Analg
45. Rabkin MT, Gillerman G, Rice NR: Orders not to A judge sided with the son, who died last night. 103:646-649, 2006.

A
Max B. Kelz, George A. Mashour, Ted G. Abel Mervyn Maze
..
.. ..

11 ,


1. , , , ,
. .*
2. , 7.
- .
8.
. , ,
3. ,
, 1-2 1000.
9.
.
4. , .
.
5. ,
,
, .
*
6. ,
(. .)

, ,
10 -
. - .
, -
1875 . , ,
. -
, - , -
, -
.
(. . 20 26) , , ,
- . -
. , -
,****
,** ,
, (
- .
), ,
. . ,
-
- ,
.*** .
,
**** (. arousal)
** : behavioral end points (. .) ,
*** : neuronal loci ,
(. .) (. .)

259
II 260

,

, -
, Frdric
Bremer (1892-1982). 1935 . ,
- -
. ,
, ; , , -
, , .
. , , ,

. , ,
. , -
, () -
, , 1. - (. 11-1).
, . -
. -
, , VI . ..
, ,
2. .

, , -
, . ,
, - , -
( . -
. 3-5).
, ,
, . Giuseppe Moruzzi (1910-
(. 11-1). , - 1986), -
, Horace Magoun (1907-1991).
.
, , (
,
, , - , ),
, -
.
6.
. 11-1 : , ,
, -

, ,
(NREM) (REM)

16 6 2
14,5 8,5 1
, (.
11-2).
18,1 5,3 0,6
20,5 2,5 0,5 Nathaniel Kleitman (1895-1999).
,
19,5 4 0,5 (rapid eye
14 9,8 <0,2 movement REM). -
-REM (non-REM NREM) ,
10 6 8
. ,
6 11,4 6,6 ,
9,5 8,5 6
.
, -
11 10 3 cerveau isol, -
13,9 6,6 3,5
( -
4,3 15,8 3,9
, I II ). -


7 14 3 .
11 10,5 2,5
cerveau isol
, , ,
McGinty DJ, Sterman MB: Sleep suppression after basal 7, ,
A forebrain lesions in the cat. Science 160:1253, 1968; and Siegel JM: The REM sleep-
memory consolidation hypothesis. Science 294:1058, 2001
.
, 261 11

II
A B
. 11-1 . A, ( cerveau isol) ,
,
. B, , ( encphale isol) ,
, . ( Steriade M, Constantinescu
E, Apostol V: Correlations between alterations of the cortical transaminase activity and EEG patterns of sleep and wakefulness induced by brain-stem transections. Brain Res
13:177-180, 1969)

, , -
. , , -
, .
-
, -
. -
.
. 15.
-
(), -
.
-
, Constantine von Economo
(1876-1931) , -

,
F.d.
. -
A F.s.
.
, -
, -

8.
,
, . -
F.d.

B F.s.
.
9,10 1 100
-
-- . 11-2 , -
() .11 , , ,
- , . A, -

- , -
, (laterodorsal tegmental LDT)
. (pedunculopontine tegmental PPT) .

.12,13 - ()
(F.d.), (F.s.) . B, -
, (.
14
Saper . ). , , ,
- , -
, . ( Batini C, Moruzzi G, Palestini M,
etal: Persistent patterns of wakefulness in the pretrigeminal midpontine preparation.
. Science 128:30-32, 1958.) A
II 262

-
. -

. : -
(LC);
- nucleus tuberomamillaris (TMN); -
(). - (RN);
,
, -
(. 11-3). (vPAG)17 -
, - ,
REM NREM; - (. 11-4) (. Jones18).
. NREM- , -
d- NREM-, REM-
(0,5-4 ), . .
NREM- ,
(. 11-3). NREM- ,
, REM-,
NREM-,
. REM- . , ,
, -
. , ,
, - REM- .
. q , -
(4-8 ) , ,
,
() (. Harris16). . -
,
NREM-
, - REM19,20. -
, - , -
, .
, ,
, , ,

REM-

NREM-

10

. 11-3 , REM- NREM-, . -


, () . REM- -
,
- (4-8 ). , , . NREM- --
, , . NREM-
A . NREM- . : , REM- NREM-. (-
Yihan Chen, , )
, 263 11


Ox
VLPO

II

TMN
LDT/PPT

LDT Ach Raphe


VLPO PPT vPAG LC
GABA
Gal vPAG
TMN LC
HIST DA
NA
Raphe
A 5-HT B

GAL Ox
GABA?


CTX Ox? Ox
Orexin
FLIPFLOP
HIST GAL
GABA GABA
BF
TMN VLPO TMN
LDT/PPT
eVLPO LC/DR
Raphe
vPAG LC NE GAL
5HT GABA

GAL NE
GABA 5HT
PPT
REM
LDT
C D
. 11-4 . A,
, . (laterodorsal tegmental LDT)
(pedunculopontine tegmental PPT) ,
, , . ( ) -
. , ,
nucleus tuberomamillaris (TMN), , (DA) -
(vPAG) (NA) (LC).
(VLPO), - . B,
VLPO . C, (ORX)
, ,
. D, ,
, . ( Saper CB, Chou TC, Scammell
TE. The sleep switch: Hypothalamic control of sleep and wakefulness. Trends Neurosci 24:726-731, 2001)

, - LDT PPT, LC,


. vPAG RN
.
, , -
.
- (. 11-5). -
,
, -
, - .
, , , -
, , - TMN
. , -
21. LC RN
, , .
-
, (LDT) - ,
(PPT) , -
. 22. A
II 264


NREM- REM-
NREM- REM-

Cx

Hi

CPu
ic Th
Mes RF LDTg
Rt
GP spd LC
ac PPTg
VTA PnO 7g Sol s
Si POA PH
SN PnC
TM Gi
cpt
GIA
GIV

(+, -;
REM-) (+; )



(-, +;
(-; NREM REM)
REM-)
(2-)
(2-)

. 11-5 , , , -
. * (W) , , -
(+) ,
, . ,
NREM- REM-. , -
, : (NA), (), (Orx) (Glu).
, , .
: (ACh), (Glu), - (GABA).
** ( ) , ,
, .
- (-/+) NREM- ( ), -
(preoptic area POA), 2- -
(NA). -
.
- , 2- , NREM-
REM- , (EMG-) ( ). , - (/, , -
) , .
ac ; CPu /; Cx ; EEG ; EMG ; 7g VII ;
Gi (); GiA , - ; GiV ,
; GP ; Hi ; ic ; LDTg ; Mes RF ; opt
; PH ; PnC ; PnO ; POA ; PPTg
; RF ; Rt ; s ; scp ; SI
; SN ; Sol ; Th ; TM ; VTA
. ( Jones BE: From waking to sleeping: Neuronal and chemical substrates. Trends Pharmacol Sci 26:578, 2005.)

* wake-active neurons (: , )
, sleep-active neurons (: , ) (. .)
** .

NREM ()
- (. . 11-4). VLPO
NREM- , , -

(VLPO). c-Fos13,23. VLPO -
, - , -
VLPO
. NREM- , . ,
, , -
, VLPO. -
, -
A , VLPO, ,
, 265 11
, , REM-
. , VLPO NREM-, , -
, REM-off. , -
, ,
24. REM-,
-
REM () -

II
,
. - REM-
REM-off .
REM-, , - -
, -
. , REM-
Michel Jouvet (. 1925), - 33,34. , -
REM- -
(PnO); - REM-off .
REM. -
PnO ( - (vlPAG)
) REM, ,
, REM-26.
- REM-, -
LDT PPT ,
. vlPAG35-37.
LDT PPT REM-27. REM- vlPAG
LDT PPT - SLD35.
REM-, -
LDT PPT REM-,
. , - -
, REM-,
-
REM-28,29; , -
LDT PPT - ,
(REM-on ).
VLPO (eVLPO) ,
REM-. , ,
eVLPO - ,
LDT - . -
100
eVLPO .
REM-, eVLPO, -, , ,
REM-30. --
REM- 38,39. -
, ,
. .
REM- -
, , - , -
, , -
. - (DSIP)40, -9,10-41,
-- (PGO) . - , -1,
(. spiky) - REM- D2 (PGD2) 42.
, -
. ,
REM - .
LDT PPT -
- D2 (PGD2) -
, - ( NREM, REM),
, REM- 26. REM- 43. PGD2 -

, - . -
, - PGD2 ,
. PGD2 . PGD2 -
, -- -D-,

; perilocus ceruleus alpha (. 11-6)
(SubC) , - ,
(SLD) 31,32. . - A
II 266

PGD2-
VLPO TMN




H1R

DPR A2AR

PGD2

. 11-6 D2 (PGD2). D2 (DPR)


( ). DPR, ,
PGD2 (VLPO ),
. VLPO 2a,
, (TMN ). ( Hayaishi O, Urade Y: Prostaglandin D2 in
sleep-wake regulation: Recent progress and perspectives. Neuroscientist 8:12, 2002)

, . -
PGD2. .
, PGD2 , , -
. -
. PGD2
, VLPO.
PGD2 49.
REM, NREM- (.
Hayaishi, Urade43). - ,
D- (DPR), , -
, - ,
, PGD2, - 50,51.
,
VLPO44. VLPO, - NREM-25.
PGD2, -,
, -
A2a -
PGD2. ,
2 - -
PGD245. , 52. ,
, , ,
2, , ,
VLPO46. , , ,
, (,
, - )53. -
-. ,
- , ,
54.
PGD2 . -
,
, , -
.
-
-
, ,
-
, . 2-
, ( ),
- -
47. , . ,
, -
48; , - 55.
-
A
, 267 11
VLPO ( . ). ,
, - , ,
: . -
2 , - NREM- ,
, PGD2 , - .
56. , cerveau isol
, ,

II
, -, NREM-
, . -
,
-
, ,
,
- (. 11-8).
, , - NREM- -
. , , ,
, - ,
- .
, -,
, , ,
, -
- ,
+
,
. -
(. 11-7)57,
, ,
, -

, -

,
58.

Dgc + -
Dml
Cx Hml
Cml +
Hpc
Cgl CC +
+
Cwm
-

Ch 5

. 11-8 -REM- (NREM) -


,
-
. NREM- -
(
B ). -
,
. 11-7 .
. A,
100 , -
14-.
,
(Cwm), (Cgl) . ,
. B, -
2,3 . CC ; Cml - , . -
; Cx ; Dgc ;
Dml ; Hml ; . .
Hpc . ( Eckenhoff MF, : , , -
Eckenhoff RG: Quantitative autoradiography of halothane binding in rat brain. J
Pharmacol Exp Ther 285:371, 1998)
(). (
Steriade M: The corticothalamic system in sleep. Front Biosci 8:d878, 2003)
A
II 268

-
. , , 67.
,
25,59,60.
, , - ,
, :
,
, 21. - , -
- . -
, , , 2- .
49,61. - , , -
- -
, (. 11-4).
- VLPO, -
(. ). --
, ,
. 68. -
- , TMN,
, - VLPO -
, . -
,
. - -
, -
62. , - ,
, - .
, , , ,
- 63. ,
- 69. ,
, -
, (, -
) -
, - 70.
64. , , -
- 6-71 -
: 72
- , ,
- , VLPO.
, 65.
,
. , -
-

, - .
, - -
(. . 11-5). 5,6--
, -
NREM- - -
, 71, 72. , -
, ,
. VLPO (. . 11-4).
- , -
,
TMN66 (. , , , -
. 11-4). - .
, -
- VLPO. , -
VLPO, , . ,
, -
VLPO. - .
- ,
14. -
, - -
, 75.
. , -
, , - , , -
A , , .
, 269 11
, -
, Hebbinghaus, Mller Pilzecker -
78. ,
, ,
, - ,
- ,
, ,

II
. - . -
- , , Santiago
, , Ramn y Cajal (1852-1934),
, . ,
, -
.
. -
, , , ( ), -
, : - 79.
, , (1849-1936)
, , -
. , 80.

, .



XX .
, H.M.,* Wilder Graves
Penfield (1891-1976), Brenda Milner (. 1918) -
100 . . XX .,
76. -, ,
, , ,
. -, Joseph
, - Gall. Karl Lashley, , , -
. -, -
( , -
) -
, - .
. ,
, -
, ,
, , , 81.
. H.M., , -
. 27 H.M.

,
, . 40
. , H.M.
- ,
, .
82 (. 11-9). ,
, - , H.M.
. , ,
- .
, ,
, .,
. , ,
, H.M.76,83 -, -
. , .. -
, , .
, , -
, , , , H.M.

,
77. - * H.M.
Henry Gustav Molaison (1926-2008),
XIX ., -
,
, Jackson, Ribot Alzheimer, (. .)
A
II 270

, . - (.
11-9).
, -
,
84,85.
,
(-
) , ,
, H.M.
, 89. -
,
, .
86. , , : H.M.
. , -
, H.M., -
. (. . 11-9).
H.M. - , H.M.
, - -
. , , .. , -
, -
. H.M. .
-
, , ,
, ,
, - -
. 90. -
H.M. ,
50 ; - -
-
83,87,88. -
- .
, - ,

() ()




()




()


B

A . 11-9 (A), (B)


, 271 11

II
C
. 11-9 . H.M. ,
, (C, , ). (A,
Squire LR, Zola SM: Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:13515, 1996; C, Corkin
S, Amaral DG, Gonzalez RG, etal: H. M.s medial temporal lobe lesion: Findings from magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 17:3964, 1997)

, 300-
. , 40
- 92.
- , -
, . , , -
.
Damasio .91 , -
- .
: - ,
,
. -
.
, -
. , , -
, .
.
, .

- 30 ,
-
. . -
6 , .
:
, ,

, ,
, -
1900 . Georg Elias Mller (1850-1934) Alfons
Pilzecker (1865-1949), (. Lechner .92). A
II 272

-
, -
, , -
- ,
, - . , ,
93. ,
,
- , -
, - .
,
, -
. 1949 ., :
,
,
94,95. -
Hebb Gerard95,96 ,

, - 1973 ., Bliss Lmo -
, (. 11-10). ,
, - - in vivo -
: (long-term potentiation LTP) -
? . LTP 98,99.
, ,
, - , LTP, LTP,
, , -
. - 100. LTP 101.
, - , , -
LTP, . LTP
, , - ,
McGaugh93, , -
. ,
- in vitro, -
- .
. , LTP
, ;
,
. , , -
, 98,99.
, , ,
, N--d--
97. (NMDA) -
, ,
, - . NMDA- -


( )

( )


( )

. 11-10 : , . -
. , , ,
A , , ,
. (McGaugh JL: Memory a century of consolidation. Science 287:248, 2000)
, 273 11


CaMKIV

MAP Kinase P
Ac Ac
Ac
CaMKII P P CBP Ac
Ac
CREB CREB Ac Ac

II
CRE CRE - Ac
Ac Ac
I-I


NO PP1
C

CaMKII
PKA (tPA, BDNF, (Fos, ICER,
Dusp1) Nr4a1)

Ca2+

Ca2+

AMPA NMDA ()

Ca2+


RIM1a

. 11-11
N--d- , .
NMDA N--d- ; AMPA --3--5--4-
; CaMKII - II; PP1 1; PKA A; MAP Kinase - -
; CaMKIV - IV; CREB RE- ; CRE ( );
CBP CREB- ; P ; Ac ( ); tPA ; BDNF -
; Dusp1 1; Fos ; ICER ICER4; Nr4a1 IB. ( Abel
T, Nguyen PV, Barad M, etal: Genetic demonstration of a role for PKA in the late phase of LTP and in hippocampus-based long-term memory. Cell 88:615-626, 1997)

.
- , 104.
, , -, -
(CaMKs), , -
- ()102 (. ,
11-11).
105. ,
( ), -
, G-, , ,
, . .
- : -
LTP. - , -
, L-LTP,
- ? -
103. - --3--5--
, LTP, - -4-
, - -
. . , ,
- CaMKII, GluR1- -
. , -
-,
, 106. A
II 274

. -
5-12
, . NREM-
LTP - ( ), ,
, GluR1107. , ,
, - . -
, , ,
, AMPA in vitro in vivo.
. , -
- ,
, 120.
,
NMDA--
-
, , , MAPK -
. - 1/2 (ERK1/2). -
, ,
, , -
- -
. . -
,
. (- -
, - 117,119. ,
), , , ,
. .
, , -
, - , , , ,
, , . -
, , ,

. . , -
40 / 0,9 / - ,
121,122. -
15 30 . ,
108. ,
, - .
, , ,
, ,
, . , -
- ,
. - -
109 110 , ,
25 .
50% (MAC),
,
MAC
( )111.
LTP -
, , ,
,
.
, - ,
, . (64 ..
LTP () 112. - 25..) : , -
, , , ,
, LTP ,
, ,
113-115. ; ,
, , LTP
- 112. GABAA, <...>*.
5-, -
116. * . IX, . III, 5, . 397 (419).
, , : 17 . -
, 117-119. 1964. .: , 1994 / . ..
. :
(-) -
() (, 1587),
A , - (. .)
, 275 11
, - .
, , , , .
123. , , -
- (,
William James ),
, .
The Varieties of Religious Experience (

II
) 1898 . - 128,129.
124. XIX . ,
, .
. XX . -
, ,
- 130,131.
. ,

1980- . Henry Beecher -
132-134.
XX .125, XXI , -
. , ..
. ,
135. , -
-
, , -
. 40 136-138.
,
, , ,
.
,
- ,
(), -
XVIII ., , . -
(). , 1980- 1990- ., :
,
, . -
- 139
: (1) , 140
( ) (2) ( (reentrant loops) -
). , , - 141
, 40 -
137
, . , 142
, ,
, - V5/MT143
. , , - , -
144
, 145
.
Giulio 146
Tononi XXI .
, Rees . , -
, -
126,127. , 147. ,
- -
, , -
, , , - , .
-
, .
,
(, -
)
(, -
) .

(, , - ,
). , -
, , - . , - A
II 276

-
. ,
152. 176 -
-
- ,
- ()
(electrical uncoupling)
- .
, , - (35-50 )
49. -
- . -
, 61. , , -
.
TMN , - -
66. ,
, - 40 ,
, 137. -
, .
,148 Velly , -
. - . -
.
. , ,
, -
. ,
, -
153. -
. , Alkire . ,
146, ..
-
, 64. .
, Velly
., -
. Peltier .
. Alkire (connectivity) -
. , 154.
on- , ,
off- . ,
.
. -

141
40 137. Alkire .
,
, -
49. , -

149. ,
, 155,156.
150. , -
, - , -
151.
. , ,
John .152,
-
. - ( -
, ).
, - -
, MT (-
152. - )157.
John Prichep
, - ,
61. , - ,
158.
. :
, , -
A , -
, 277 11

.
-
,
. ,

- .

II
- , -
, ,
, , -
-, , -
. , .
- ,
, , 22% , -
, 168. -

- -. (near-misses) , ,
, .
- -
,
148. , , , , -
, - ,
, 159,160, . Sebel .169
-
.
0,13%
, , -
. ,
Walling Hicks 1-2 1000170. ,
, , -
- 1
161. 14 560 , 0,0069%171.
, ,
, .
, . , ,
- ,
, , , -
-, , 172.
50%- -
(cognitive rebinding). ,
, 173. --
, ,
, -
. ,
, - .
162 -
163.
, 1937 . Gibbs . , -
(disconnection)164. - 174.
, -
, , -
164, : (1) -
.
, (signature) , (2)
--
165. (3)
, , -
, 166.
, -
, , . -
Massimini .167 , NREM- -
. -
, , , -
(. . 39).
-
. - A
II 278

, , .
, BIS--
- 175. BIS
(bispectral index BIS; Aspect
Medical Systems, , ) 185. -
, - BIS
- -176. Narcotrend , -
(MonitorTechnik, , ) 186,187. BIS
- 188,189.
, BIS, -
177. (Patient State Index PSI; -
Physiometrix, Inc, . , ) - 190. -
,
,
178. (Entropy monitors, BIS .
, S/5, Instrumentarium Corp. [DatexOhmeda], , ,
, ) - (138), ($2200) -
, 179, - BIS

, 180. - .
(
0,8-32 , - BIS
) ( 0,8-47 , - BIS
, ). BIS -
, . Chen .191 , PSI -
- - BIS ,
- . PSI BIS -
, -
, , PSI
181,182. BIS 192.
, Narcotrend
, -
. BIS177. Narcotrend -
BIS
BIS-
BIS- (n = 26)193. , BIS
, Narcotrend -
2000 , , 177.
, ,
(. . 39)176. - BIS -
, 194, --
; 195. ,

- , ,
. - , BIS196.

( BIS -
0 100, 0 , -
100 ), - 197.
.
1990- . , BIS
BIS - , BIS--
, , 198. ,
, BIS -
. 160,199. -

, BIS - BIS159,200, , , -
, , - 201. , ,
183. , ,
BIS - NMDA-202. BIS-
BIS MAC,
BIS ,
MAC . Flaishon .184 203. , ,
-
BIS. BIS 60 , BIS204,
A -
, 279 11
205. , BIS
, . ,
,
, 206,
207. BIS, ;
, , -

II
208. .
, ,
, , .
.*
* -
, , ,
,
. . 46 (. . . .) .


1. Rechtschaffen A, Bergmann BM, Everson CA, et 20. Mileykovskiy BY, Kiyashchenko LI, Siegel JM: 37. Verret L, Fort P, Gervasoni D, et al: Localization
al: Sleep deprivation in the rat: X. Integration and Behavioral correlates of activity in identified of the neurons active during paradoxical (REM)
discussion of the findings. Sleep 25:68, 2002. hypocretin/orexin neurons. Neuron 46:787, 2005. sleep and projecting to the locus coeruleus
2. Rial RV, Nicolau MC, Gamundi A, et al: The 21. Jones BE: Arousal systems. Front Biosci 8:s438, noradrenergic neurons in the rat. J Comp Neurol
trivial function of sleep. Sleep Med Rev 11:311, 2003. 495:573, 2006.
2007. 22. Steriade M, Timofeev I: Neuronal plasticity in 38. Ishimori K: True cause of sleepa hypnogenic
3. Frank MG: The mystery of sleep function: thalamocortical networks during sleep and substance as evidenced in the brain of sleep-
Current perspectives and future directions. Rev waking oscillations. Neuron 37:563, 2003. deprived animals. Tokyo Igakkai Zasshi 23:429,
Neurosci 17:375, 2006. 23. Sherin JE, Elmquist JK, Torrealba F, et al: Innerva- 1909.
4. Gally JA, Edelman GM: Neural reapportionment: tion of histaminergic tuberomammillary neurons 39. Legendre R, Pzeron H: Reecherches sur le besoin
An hypothesis to account for the function of by GABAergic and galaninergic neurons in the de sommeil consecutive a une veille prolongee. Z
sleep. C R Biol 327:721, 2004. ventrolateral preoptic nucleus of the rat. J Neuro- Allg Physiol 14:235, 1913.
5. Tononi G, Cirelli C: Sleep function and sci 18:4705, 1998. 40. Schoenenberger GA, Monnier M: Characteriza-
synaptic homeostasis. Sleep Med Rev 10:49, 24. Lu J, Greco MA, Shiromani P, et al: Effect of tion of a delta-electroencephalogram (-sleep)-
2006. lesions of the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus on inducing peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
6. Moruzzi G, Magoun HW: Brain stem reticular NREM and REM sleep. J Neurosci 20:3830, 2000. 74:1282, 1977.
formation and activation of the EEG. Electroen- 25. Steriade M: The corticothalamic system in sleep. 41. Cravatt BF, ProsperoGarcia O, Siuzdak G, et al:
cephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1:455, 1949. Front Biosci 8:d878, 2003. Chemical characterization of a family of brain
7. Bremer F: Cerveau isole et physiologie du 26. McCarley RW: Neurobiology of REM and NREM lipids that induce sleep. Science 268:1506, 1995.
sommeil. C R Soc Biol 118:1235, 1935. sleep. Sleep Med 8:302, 2007. 42. Hobson JA, PaceSchott EF: The cognitive neu-
8. von Economo C: Sleep as a problem of localiza- 27. Webster HH, Jones BE: Neurotoxic lesions of the roscience of sleep: Neuronal systems, conscious-
tion. J Nerv Ment Dis 71:249, 1930. dorsolateral pontomesencephalic tegmentum- ness and learning. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:679, 2002.
9. McGinty DJ, Sterman MB: Sleep suppression after cholinergic cell area in the cat. II. Effects upon 43. Hayaishi O, Urade Y: Prostaglandin D 2 in sleep-
basal forebrain lesions in the cat. Science sleep-waking states. Brain Res 458:285, 1988. wake regulation: Recent progress and perspec-
160:1253, 1968. 28. Kayama Y, Ohta M, Jodo E: Firing of possibly tives. Neuroscientist 8:12, 2002.
10. Nauta W: Hypothalamic regulation of sleep in rats. cholinergic neurons in the rat laterodorsal teg- 44. Scammell T, Gerashchenko D, Urade Y, et al:
An experimental study. J Neurophysiol 9:285, mental nucleus during sleep and wakefulness. Activation of ventrolateral preoptic neurons by
1946. Brain Res 569:210, 1992. the somnogen prostaglandin D2. Proc Natl Acad
11. Lin JS, Sakai K, VanniMercier G, et al: A critical 29. Steriade M, Datta S, Pare D, et al: Neuronal activi- Sci U S A 95:7754, 1998.
role of the posterior hypothalamus in the mecha- ties in brain-stem cholinergic nuclei related to 45. Satoh S, Matsumura H, Koike N, et al: Region-
nisms of wakefulness determined by microinjec- tonic activation processes in thalamocortical dependent difference in the sleep-promoting
tion of muscimol in freely moving cats. Brain Res systems. J Neurosci 10:2541, 1990. potency of an adenosine A2A receptor agonist. Eur
479:225, 1989. 30. Lu J, Bjorkum AA, Xu M, et al: Selective activa- J Neurosci 11:1587, 1999.
12. Sherin JE, Shiromani PJ, McCarley RW, et al: tion of the extended ventrolateral preoptic 46. Morairty S, Rainnie D, McCarley R, et al: Disin
Activation of ventrolateral preoptic neurons nucleus during rapid eye movement sleep. J Neu- hibition of ventrolateral preoptic area sleep-active
during sleep. Science 271:216, 1996. rosci 22:4568, 2002. neurons by adenosine: A new mechanism for
13. Szymusiak R, Alam N, Steininger TL, et al: Sleep- 31. Jouvet M: What does a cat dream about? Trends sleep promotion. Neuroscience 123:451, 2004.
waking discharge patterns of ventrolateral preop- Neurosci 2:280, 1979. 47. Kopp VJ, Shafer A: Anesthesiologists and periop-
tic/anterior hypothalamic neurons in rats. Brain 32. Sinton CM, McCarley RW: Neurophysiological erative communication. Anesthesiology 93:548,
Res 803:178, 1998. mechanisms of sleep and wakefulness: A question 2000.
14. Saper CB, Chou TC, Scammell TE: The sleep of balance. Semin Neurol 24:211, 2004. 48. Lydic R, Biebuyck JF: Sleep neurobiology: Rele-
switch: Hypothalamic control of sleep and wake- 33. Hunsley MS, Palmiter RD: Norepinephrine-defi- vance for mechanistic studies of anaesthesia. Br J
fulness. Trends Neurosci 24:726, 2001. cient mice exhibit normal sleep-wake states but Anaesth 72:506, 1994.
15. Saper CB: Staying awake for dinner: Hypotha- have shorter sleep latency after mild stress and 49. Alkire MT, Haier RJ, Fallon JH: Toward a unified
lamic integration of sleep, feeding, and circadian low doses of amphetamine. Sleep 26:521, 2003. theory of narcosis: Brain imaging evidence for a
rhythms. Prog Brain Res 153:243, 2006. 34. Ouyang M, Hellman K, Abel T, et al: Adrenergic thalamocortical switch as the neurophysiologic
16. Harris CD: Neurophysiology of sleep and wake- signaling plays a critical role in the maintenance basis of anesthetic-induced unconsciousness.
fulness. Respir Care Clin N Am 11:567, 2005. of waking and in the regulation of REM sleep. J Conscious Cogn 9:370, 2000.
17. Lu J, Jhou TC, Saper CB: Identification of wake- Neurophysiol 92:2071, 2004. 50. Detsch O, Kochs E, Siemers M, et al: Increased
active dopaminergic neurons in the ventral peri- 35. Lu J, Sherman D, Devor M, et al: A putative flip- responsiveness of cortical neurons in contrast to
aqueductal gray matter. J Neurosci 26:193, 2006. flop switch for control of REM sleep. Nature thalamic neurons during isoflurane-induced EEG
18. Jones BE: From waking to sleeping: Neuronal and 441:589, 2006. bursts in rats. Neurosci Lett 317:9, 2002.
chemical substrates. Trends Pharmacol Sci 36. Sastre JP, Buda C, Kitahama K, et al: Importance 51. VahleHinz C, Detsch O, Siemers M, et al: Local
26:578, 2005. of the ventrolateral region of the periaqueductal GABA(A) receptor blockade reverses isofluranes
19. Lee MG, Hassani OK, Jones BE: Discharge of gray and adjacent tegmentum in the control of suppressive effects on thalamic neurons in vivo.
identified orexin/hypocretin neurons across the
sleep-waking cycle. J Neurosci 25:6716, 2005.
paradoxical sleep as studied by muscimol micro-
injections in the cat. Neuroscience 74:415, 1996.
Anesth Analg 92:1578, 2001.
52. Tung A, Szafran MJ, Bluhm B, et al: Sleep depriva-
A
II 280

tion potentiates the onset and duration of loss of involved in motor control. J Comp Neurol ing induces long-term potentiation in the hip-
righting reflex induced by propofol and isoflu- 489:425, 2005. pocampus. Science 313:1093, 2006.
rane. Anesthesiology 97:906, 2002. 74. Sukhotinsky I, Zalkind V, Lu J, et al: Neural path- 102. Malenka RC, Nicoll RA: Long-term potentia-

53. Tung A, Bergmann BM, Herrera S, et al: Recovery ways associated with loss of consciousness caused tiona decade of progress? Science 285:1870,
from sleep deprivation occurs during propofol by intracerebral microinjection of GABA(A)- 1999.
anesthesia. Anesthesiology 100:1419, 2004. active anesthetics. Eur J Neurosci 25:1417, 2007. 103. McClung CA, Nestler EJ: Neuroplasticity medi-
54. Sleigh JW, Andrzejowski J, SteynRoss A, et al: 75. Ma J, Shen B, Stewart LS, et al: The septohip- ated by altered gene expression. Neuropsychop-
The bispectral index: A measure of depth of sleep? pocampal system participates in general anesthe- harmacology 33:3, 2008.
Anesth Analg 88:659, 1999. sia. J Neurosci 22:RC200, 2002. 104. ReymannKG, Frey JU: The late maintenance of
55. Kaputlu I, Sadan G, Ozdem S: Exogenous adeno- 76. Milner B, Squire LR, Kandel ER: Cognitive neu- hippocampal LTP: Requirements, phases, synap-
sine potentiates hypnosis induced by intravenous roscience and the study of memory. Neuron tic tagging, late-associativity and implications.
anaesthetics. Anaesthesia 53:496, 1998. 20:445, 1998. Neuropharmacology 52:24, 2007.
56. Sato T, Araki I, Kushikata T, et al: Decreased 77. Zalta EN: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 105. Levenson JM, Sweatt JD: Epigenetic mechanisms
hypothalamic prostaglandin D2 and prostaglan- Available at http://plato.stanford.edu. in memory formation. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:108,
din E2 contents during isoflurane anaesthesia in 78. Squire LR, Kandel ER: Memory: From Mind to 2005.
rats. Can J Anaesth 42:1031, 1995. Molecules. New York, Owl Books, 2000. 106. Malinow R, Malenka RC: AMPA receptor traf-
57. Eckenhoff MF, Eckenhoff RG: Quantitative auto- 79. Cajal SR: The croonian lecture: La fine structure ficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neuro-
radiography of halothane binding in rat brain. J des centres nerveux. Proc R Soc Lond 5:444-468, sci 25:103, 2002.
Pharmacol Exp Ther 285:371, 1998. 1894. 107. Nayak A, Zastrow DJ, Lickteig R, et al: Mainte-
58. Dong HL, Fukuda S, Murata E, et al: Excitatory 80. Pavlov IP, Anrep GV II: Conditioned Reflexes; an nance of late-phase LTP is accompanied by PKA-
and inhibitory actions of isoflurane on the cho- Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the dependent increase in AMPA receptor synthesis.
linergic ascending arousal system of the rat. Cerebral Cortex. London, Oxford University Nature 394:680, 1998.
Anesthesiology 104:122, 2006. Press, Humphrey Milford, 1927. 108. Veselis RA: Memory: A guide for anaesthetists.
59. Alkire MT, Miller J: General anesthesia and the 81. Lashley KS: Basic neural mechanisms in behavior. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 21:297, 2007.
neural correlates of consciousness. Prog Brain Res Psychol Rev 37:1, 1930. 109. Dwyer R, Bennett HL, Eger EI 2nd, et al: Effects
150:229, 2005. 82. Corkin S, Amaral DG, Gonzalez RG, et al: H.M.s of isoflurane and nitrous oxide in subanesthetic
60. Steriade M, Amzica F, Contreras D: Cortical and medial temporal lobe lesion: Findings from mag- concentrations on memory and responsiveness in
thalamic cellular correlates of electroencephalo- netic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 17:3964, volunteers. Anesthesiology 77:888, 1992.
graphic burst-suppression. Electroencephalogr 1997. 110. Dutton RC, Maurer AJ, Sonner JM, et al: The
Clin Neurophysiol 90:1, 1994. 83. Squire LR: Memory and the hippocampus: A syn- concentration of isoflurane required to suppress
61. Fiset P, Paus T, Daloze T, et al: Brain mechanisms thesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and learning depends on the type of learning. Anes-
of propofol-induced loss of consciousness in humans. Psychol Rev 99:195, 1992. thesiology 94:514, 2001.
humans: A positron emission tomographic study. 84. Jackson JH: Selected writings of John Hughlings 111. Alkire MT, Gorski LA: Relative amnesic potency
J Neurosci 19:5506, 1999. Jackson, vol I and II. London, Hodder, of five inhalational anesthetics follows the Meyer
62. Shirvalkar P, Seth M, Schiff ND, et al: Cognitive 1931-1932. Overton rule. Anesthesiology 101:417, 2004.
enhancement with central thalamic electrical 85. Ribot T: Diseases of Memory. New York, Apple- 112. Simon W, Hapfelmeier G, Kochs E, et al: Isoflu-
stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:17007, ton, 1882. rane blocks synaptic plasticity in the mouse hip-
2006. 86. Frankland PW, Bontempi B: The organization of pocampus. Anesthesiology 94:1058, 2001.
63. Schiff ND, Giacino JT, Kalmar K, et al: Behav- recent and remote memories. Nat Rev Neurosci 113. Akhondzadeh S, Stone TW: Potentiation of mus-
ioural improvements with thalamic stimulation 6:119, 2005. cimol-induced long-term depression by benzodi-
after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature 87. RempelClower NL, Zola SM, Squire LR, et al: azepines and prevention or reversal by
448:600, 2007. Three cases of enduring memory impairment pregnenolone sulfate. Pharmacol Res 38:441,
64. Alkire MT, McReynolds JR, Hahn EL, et al: Tha- after bilateral damage limited to the hippocampal 1998.
lamic microinjection of nicotine reverses sevoflu- formation. J Neurosci 16:5233, 1996. 114. Nagashima K, Zorumski CF, Izumi Y: Propofol
rane-induced loss of righting reflex in the rat. 88. Squire LR: Memory systems of the brain: A brief inhibits long-term potentiation but not long-term
Anesthesiology 107:264, 2007. history and current perspective. Neurobiol Learn depression in rat hippocampal slices. Anesthesi-
65. Hudetz AG, Wood JD, Kampine JP: Cholinergic Mem 82:171, 2004. ology 103:318, 2005.
reversal of isoflurane anesthesia in rats as meas- 89. Squire LR, Zola SM: Structure and function of 115. Takamatsu I, Sekiguchi M, Wada K, et al: Propo-
ured by cross-approximate entropy of the electro- declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. fol-mediated impairment of CA1 long-term
encephalogram. Anesthesiology 99:1125, 2003. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:13515, 1996. potentiation in mouse hippocampal slices. Neu-
66. Nelson LE, Guo TZ, Lu J, et al: The sedative com- 90. Hassabis D, Kumaran D, Vann SD, et al: Patients rosci Lett 389:129, 2005.
ponent of anesthesia is mediated by GABA(A) with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new 116. Caraiscos VB, Newell JG, YouTen KE, et al:

receptors in an endogenous sleep pathway. Nat experiences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:1726, Selective enhancement of tonic GABAergic inhi-
Neurosci 5:979, 2002. 2007. bition in murine hippocampal neurons by low
67. Kelz MB, Sun Y, Chen J, et al: An essential role 91. Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H, et al: Double concentrations of the volatile anesthetic isoflu-
for orexins in emergence from general anesthesia. dissociation of conditioning and declarative rane. J Neurosci 24:8454, 2004.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:1309, 2008. knowledge relative to the amygdala and hip- 117. Fibuch EE, Wang JQ: Inhibition of the MAPK/
68. Nelson LE, Lu J, Guo T, et al: The alpha2-adreno- pocampus in humans. Science 269:1115, 1995. ERK cascade: A potential transcription-depend-
ceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an 92. Lechner HA, Squire LR, Byrne JH: 100 years of ent mechanism for the amnesic effect of anes-
endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its consolidationremembering Muller and thetic propofol. Neurosci Bull 23:119, 2007.
sedative effects. Anesthesiology 98:428, 2003. Pilzecker. Learn Mem 6:77, 1999. 118. Gerlai R, McNamara A: Anesthesia induced ret-
69. Miller RD, Way WL, Eger EI 2nd: The effects of 93. McGaugh JL: Memorya century of consolida- rograde amnesia is ameliorated by ephrinA5-IgG
alpha-methyldopa, reserpine, guanethidine, and tion. Science 287:248, 2000. in mice: EphA receptor tyrosine kinases are
iproniazid on minimum alveolar anesthetic 94. Duncan CP: The retroactive effect of electroshock involved in mammalian memory. Behav Brain
requirement (MAC). Anesthesiology 29:1153, on learning. J Comp Physiol Psychol 42:32, 1949. Res 108:133, 2000.
1968. 95. Gerard RW: Physiology and psychiatry. Am J Psy- 119. Kozinn J, Mao L, Arora A, et al: Inhibition of
70. Johnston RR, Way WL, Miller RD: Alteration of chiatry 106:161, 1949. glutamatergic activation of extracellular signal-
anesthetic requirement by amphetamine. Anes- 96. Hebb DO: The Organization of Behavior. New regulated protein kinases in hippocampal
thesiology 36:357, 1972. York, John Wiley & Sons, 1949. neurons by the intravenous anesthetic propofol.
71. Mueller RA, Smith RD, Spruill WA, et al: Central 97. Davis HP, Squire LR: Protein synthesis and Anesthesiology 105:1182, 2006.
monaminergic neuronal effects on minimum memory: A review. Psychol Bull 96:518, 1984. 120. Perouansky M, Hentschke H, Perkins M, et al:
alveolar concentrations (MAC) of halothane and 98. Bliss TV, Collingridge GL: A synaptic model of Amnesic concentrations of the nonimmobilizer
cyclopropane in rats. Anesthesiology 42:143, memory: Long-term potentiation in the hip- 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (F6, 2N) and
1975. pocampus. Nature 361:31, 1993. isoflurane alter hippocampal theta oscillations in
72. Roizen MF, White PF, Eger EI 2nd, et al: Effects 99. Martin SJ, Grimwood PD, Morris RG: Synaptic vivo. Anesthesiology 106:1168, 2007.
of ablation of serotonin or norepinephrine brain- plasticity and memory: An evaluation of the 121. Alkire MT, Nathan SV: Does the amygdala

stem areas on halothane and cyclopropane MACs hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci 23:649, 2000. mediate anesthetic-induced amnesia? Basolateral
in rats. Anesthesiology 49:252, 1978. 100. Moser EI, Krobert KA, Moser MB, et al: Impaired amygdala lesions block sevoflurane-induced
73. Sukhotinsky I, Hopkins DA, Lu J, et al: Movement spatial learning after saturation of long-term amnesia. Anesthesiology 102:754, 2005.
suppression during anesthesia: Neural projec- potentiation. Science 281:2038, 1998. 122. Alkire MT, Vazdarjanova A, DickinsonAnson
A tions from the mesopontine tegmentum to areas 101. Whitlock JR, Heynen AJ, Shuler MG, et al: Learn- H,et al: Lesions of the basolateral amygdala
, 281 11
complex block propofol-induced amnesia for dynamic of action on cortical and subcortical ness during anaesthesia: A prospective case study.
inhibitory avoidance learning in rats. Anesthesi- structures of anesthetic agents during induction Lancet 355:707, 2000.
ology 95:708, 2001. of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 107:202, 2007. 171. Pollard RJ, Coyle JP, Gilbert RL, et al: Intraopera-
123. Hale JR, de Boer JZ, Chanton JP, et al: Question- 149. White NS, Alkire MT: Impaired thalamocortical tive awareness in a regional medical system: A
ing the Delphic oracle. Sci Am 289:66, 2003. connectivity in humans during general-anes- review of 3 years data. Anesthesiology 106:269,
124. Tymoczko D: The nitrous oxide philosopher.
thetic-induced unconsciousness. Neuroimage 2007.
Atlantic Monthly 277, 1996. 19:402, 2003. 172. Osterman JE, van der Kolk BA: Awareness during
125. Beecher HK: Anesthesias second power: Probing 150. Friston KJ, Buechel C, Fink GR, et al: Psycho- anesthesia and posttraumatic stress disorder. Gen

II
the mind. Science 105:164, 1947. physiological and modulatory interactions in Hosp Psychiatry 20:274, 1998.
126. Tononi G: An information integration theory of neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6:218, 1997. 173. Samuelsson P, Brudin L, Sandin RH: Late psycho-
consciousness. BMC Neurosci 5:42, 2004. 151. Ying SW, Abbas SY, Harrison NL, et al: Propofol logical symptoms after awareness among con-
127. Tononi G, Sporns O: Measuring information inte- block of I(h) contributes to the suppression of secutively included surgical patients.
gration. BMC Neurosci 4:31, 2003. neuronal excitability and rhythmic burst firing in Anesthesiology 106:26, 2007.
128. von der Malsburg C: The binding problem of thalamocortical neurons. Eur J Neurosci 23:465, 174. Gibbs FA, Gibbs LE, Lennox WG: Effect on the
neural networks. In Llinas R, Churchland PS 2006. electroencephalogram of certain drugs which
(eds): The MindBrain Continuum. Cambridge, 152. John ER, Prichep LS, Kox W, et al: Invariant
influence nervous activity. Arch Intern Med
MA, MIT Press, 1996. reversible QEEG effects of anesthetics. Conscious 60:154, 1937.
129. von der Malsburg C: The correlation theory of Cogn 10:165, 2001. 175. Rampil IJ: A primer for EEG signal processing in
brain function. In MPI Biophysical Chemistry, 153. Imas OA, Ropella KM, Ward BD, et al: Volatile anesthesia. Anesthesiology 89:980, 1998.
Internal Report. Max Planck Institute for Bio- anesthetics disrupt frontal-posterior recurrent 176. Rosow C, Manberg PJ: Bispectral index monitor-
physical Chemistry, Gttingen, 1981, p 81. information transfer at gamma frequencies in rat. ing. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 19:947, 2001.
130. Singer W: Neuronal synchronization: A solution Neurosci Lett 387:145, 2005. 177. Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Larsen R, et al: Application of
to the binding problem? In Churchland PS (ed): 154. Peltier SJ, Kerssens C, Hamann SB, et al: Func- Bispectral Index and Narcotrend index to the
The MindBrain Continuum. Cambridge, MA, tional connectivity changes with concentration of measurement of the electroencephalographic
MIT Press, 1996, p 101. sevoflurane anesthesia. Neuroreport 16:285, effects of isoflurane with and without burst sup-
131. Singer W: Putative functions of temporal correla- 2005. pression. Anesthesiology 101:847, 2004.
tions in neocortical processing. In Koch C, Davis 155. Mashour GA: Consciousness unbound: Toward a 178. Dressler O, Schneider G, Stockmanns G, et al:
J (eds): Large Scale Neuronal Theories of the paradigm of general anesthesia. Anesthesiology Awareness and the EEG power spectrum: Analy-
Brain. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1994, p 201. 100:428, 2004. sis of frequencies. Br J Anaesth 93:806, 2004.
132. Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM: The fusi- 156. Mashour GA: Integrating the science of con-
179. Shannon CE: A mathematical theory of commu-
form face area: A module in human extrastriate sciousness and anesthesia. Anesth Analg 103:975, nication. Bell System Technical J 27:379, 623,
cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci 2006. 1948.
17:4302, 1997. 157. Pack CC, Berezovskii VK, Born RT: Dynamic 180. Vakkuri A, YliHankala A, Talja P, et al: Time-
133. Maunsell JH, Van Essen DC: Functional proper- properties of neurons in cortical area MT in alert frequency balanced spectral entropy as a measure
ties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of and anaesthetized macaque monkeys. Nature of anesthetic drug effect in central nervous system
the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus 414:905, 2001. during sevoflurane, propofol, and thiopental
direction, speed, and orientation. J Neurophysiol 158. John ER, Prichep LS: The anesthetic cascade: A anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 48:145, 2004.
49:1127, 1983. theory of how anesthesia suppresses conscious- 181. Scheller B, Schneider G, Daunderer M, et al:

134. Tanaka K: Neuronal mechanisms of object recog- ness. Anesthesiology 102:447, 2005. High-frequency components of auditory evoked
nition. Science 262:685, 1993. 159. Sakai T, Singh H, Mi WD, et al: The effect of keta- potentials are detected in responsive but not in
135. Hebb DO: The Organization of Behavior: A Neu- mine on clinical endpoints of hypnosis and EEG unconscious patients. Anesthesiology 103:944,
ropsychological Theory. New York, Wiley, 1949. variables during propofol infusion. Acta Anaes- 2005.
136. Gray CM: The temporal correlation hypothesis of thesiol Scand 43:212, 1999. 182. Schneider G, Hollweck R, Ningler M, et al: Detec-
visual feature integration: Still alive and well. 160. Yamamura T, Fukuda M, Takeya H, et al: Fast tion of consciousness by electroencephalogram
Neuron 24:31, 1999. oscillatory EEG activity induced by analgesic and auditory evoked potentials. Anesthesiology
137. Joliot M, Ribary U, Llinas R: Human oscillatory concentrations of nitrous oxide in man. Anesth 103:934, 2005.
brain activity near 40 Hz coexists with cognitive Analg 60:283, 1981. 183. Sebel PS, Lang E, Rampil IJ, et al: A multicenter
temporal binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 161. Walling PT, Hicks KN: Nonlinear changes in
study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis
91:11748, 1994. brain dynamics during emergence from sevoflu- for monitoring anesthetic effect. Anesth Analg
138. Rodriguez E, George N, Lachaux JP, et al: Percep- rane anesthesia: Preliminary exploration using 84:891, 1997.
tions shadow: Long-distance synchronization of new software. Anesthesiology 105:927, 2006. 184. Flaishon R, Windsor A, Sigl J, et al: Recovery of
human brain activity. Nature 397:430, 1999. 162. Schiff ND, Ribary U, Moreno DR, et al: Residual consciousness after thiopental or propofol.
139. Newman J, Baars BJ: A neural attentional model cerebral activity and behavioural fragments can Bispectral index and isolated forearm technique.
of access to consciousness: A global workspace remain in the persistently vegetative brain. Brain Anesthesiology 86:613, 1997.
perspective. Concepts Neurosci 4:255, 1993. 125:1210, 2002. 185. Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, et al: Bispectral
140. Bogen JE: On the neurophysiology of conscious- 163. Laureys S, Goldman S, Phillips C, et al: Impaired analysis measures sedation and memory effects of
ness, parts I and II. Conscious Cogn 4:52 1995. effective cortical connectivity in vegetative state: propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in
141. Edelman GM: The Remembered Present: A Bio- Preliminary investigation using PET. Neuroimage healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 86:836, 1997.
logical Theory of Consciousness. New York, Basic 9:377, 1999. 186. Katoh T, Bito H, Sato S: Influence of age on hyp-
Books, 1989. 164. Laureys S: The neural correlate of (un)awareness: notic requirement, bispectral index, and 95%
142. Logothetis NK, Schall JD: Neuronal correlates of Lessons from the vegetative state. Trends Cogn spectral edge frequency associated with sedation
subjective visual perception. Science 245:761, Sci 9:556, 2005. induced by sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 92:55,
1989. 165. Laureys S, Faymonville ME, Luxen A, et al: Res- 2000.
143. Tootell RB, Reppas JB, Dale AM, et al: Visual toration of thalamocortical connectivity after 187. Kearse LA Jr, Rosow C, Zaslavsky A, et al: Bispec-
motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT recovery from persistent vegetative state. Lancet tral analysis of the electroencephalogram predicts
revealed by functional magnetic resonance 355:1790, 2000. conscious processing of information during
imaging. Nature 375:139, 1995. 166. Lydic R, Baghdoyan HA: Sleep, anesthesiology, propofol sedation and hypnosis. Anesthesiology
144. Crick F, Koch C: Are we aware of neural activity and the neurobiology of arousal state control. 88:25, 1998.
in primary visual cortex? Nature 375:121, 1995. Anesthesiology 103:1268, 2005. 188. Denman WT, Swanson EL, Rosow D, et al: Pedi-
145. Cotterill R: On the unity of conscious experience. 167. Massimini M, Ferrarelli F, Huber R, et al: Break- atric evaluation of the bispectral index (BIS)
J Consciousness Stud 2:290, 1994. down of cortical effective connectivity during monitor and correlation of BIS with end-tidal
146. Cauller LJ, Kulics AT: The neural basis of the sleep. Science 309:2228, 2005. sevoflurane concentration in infants and chil-
behaviorally relevant N1 component of the soma- 168. Leslie K, Skrzypek H, Paech MJ, et al: Dreaming dren. Anesth Analg 90:872, 2000.
tosensory-evoked potential in SI cortex of awake during anesthesia and anesthetic depth in elective 189. Whyte SD, Booker PD: Bispectral index during
monkeys: Evidence that backward cortical projec- surgery patients: A prospective cohort study. isoflurane anesthesia in pediatric patients. Anesth
tions signal conscious touch sensation. Exp Brain Anesthesiology 106:33, 2007. Analg 98:1644, 2004.
Res 84:607, 1991. 169. Sebel PS, Bowdle TA, Ghoneim MM, et al: The 190. Myles PS, Leslie K, McNeil J, et al: Bispectral
147. Rees G, Kreiman G, Koch C: Neural correlates of incidence of awareness during anesthesia: A mul- index monitoring to prevent awareness during
consciousness in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci ticenter United States study. Anesth Analg 99:833, anaesthesia: The B-Aware randomised controlled
3:261, 2002. 2004. trial. Lancet 363:1757, 2004.
148. Velly LJ, Rey MF, Bruder NJ, et al: Differential 170. Sandin RH, Enlund G, Samuelsson P, et al: Aware- 191. Chen X, Tang J, White PF, et al: A comparison of
A
II 282

patient state index and bispectral index values propofol at different clinical endpoints. Br J sis of the electroencephalogram does not predict
during the perioperative period. Anesth Analg Anaesth 94:492, 2005. responsiveness to verbal command in patients
95:1669, 2002. 197. White PF, Tang J, Romero GF, et al: A comparison emerging from xenon anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth
192. White PF, Tang J, Ma H, et al: Is the patient of state and response entropy versus bispectral 85:359, 2000.
state analyzer with the PSArray2 a cost-effective index values during the perioperative period. 204. Hans P, Dewandre PY, Brichant JF, et al: Com-
alternative to the bispectral index monitor during Anesth Analg 102:160, 2006. parative effects of ketamine on Bispectral Index
the perioperative period? Anesth Analg 99:1429, 198. Dahaba AA: Different conditions that could result and spectral entropy of the electroencephalogram
2004. in the bispectral index indicating an incorrect under sevoflurane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth
193. Schmidt GN, Bischoff P, Standl T, et al: Compara- hypnotic state. Anesth Analg 101:765, 2005. 94:336, 2005.
tive evaluation of Narcotrend, Bispectral Index, 199. Rampil IJ, Kim JS, Lenhardt R, et al: Bispectral 205. Hans P, Dewandre PY, Brichant JF, et al: Effects of
and classical electroencephalographic variables EEG index during nitrous oxide administration. nitrous oxide on spectral entropy of the EEG
during induction, maintenance, and emergence Anesthesiology 89:671, 1998. during surgery under balanced anaesthesia with
of a propofol/remifentanil anesthesia. Anesth 200. Vereecke HE, Struys MM, Mortier EP: A com- sufentanil and sevoflurane. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg
Analg 98:1346, 2004. parison of bispectral index and ARX-derived 56:37, 2005.
194. Ellerkmann RK, Liermann VM, Alves TM, et al: auditory evoked potential index in measuring the 206. Messner M, Beese U, Romstock J, et al: The

Spectral entropy and bispectral index as measures clinical interaction between ketamine and propo- bispectral index declines during neuromuscular
of the electroencephalographic effects of sevoflu- fol anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 58:957, 2003. block in fully awake persons. Anesth Analg
rane. Anesthesiology 101:1275, 2004. 201. Hering W, Geisslinger G, Kamp HD, et al: Changes 97:488, 2003.
195. Schmidt GN, Bischoff P, Standl T, et al: Compara- in the EEG power spectrum after midazolam 207. Liu N, Chazot T, Huybrechts I, et al: The influence
tive evaluation of the DatexOhmeda S/5 Entropy anaesthesia combined with racemic or S- (+) keta- of a muscle relaxant bolus on bispectral and
Module and the Bispectral Index monitor during mine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 38:719, 1994. DatexOhmeda entropy values during propofol-
propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology 202. Sato Y, Kobayashi E, Murayama T, et al: Effect of remifentanil induced loss of consciousness.
101:1283, 2004. N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor 1 subunit gene Anesth Analg 101:1713, 2005.
196. Iannuzzi M, Iannuzzi E, Rossi F, et al: Relation- disruption of the action of general anesthetic 208. Niedhart DJ, Kaiser HA, Jacobsohn E, et al: Intra-
ship between Bispectral Index, electroencephalo- drugs in mice. Anesthesiology 102:557, 2005. patient reproducibility of the BISxp monitor.
graphic state entropy and effect-site EC50 for 203. Goto T, Nakata Y, Saito H, et al: Bispectral analy- Anesthesiology 104:242, 2006.

A
David B. Glick
..
..

()
12


1. ,
, (, ,
, )
. 6. -
2.
, .
7.
.
3. .
8.
. ; 75%
4. - .
9. (,
, , )
.
5. .

() - -
(.. ) . ,
, - .
. , -
- .
, , -
-, - -, -
, ,
( -
-, - .
). -
. , -
,
. -
,
, , -
, - . , , -
, -
. . -
, -
, -
. . .. 1899. -
, , ,
- , ,
. - -
. , , -
, ,

283
II 284

, ,
. , ,
. -
. ,
, , ,
- , , --
. .
- -
, . , (. 12-1):
, , 1. , -
. -
, - 2.
, 3. -
- .
, (.. - 4.
) , - , ,

(, , 5. ,
).
,
, 6. .
.
. , ,
, - , -
, , ,
. . -
, - ,
. -
, , - .
, , - -
, - - -
. 1, 2, 1, 2 . 2-
, , -
,
, , 1-
, . (. 12-2). 1--
1900-. , - , 2--

, . -
. , , - (. . 12-1):
, 1.
. , - 2.
, 3. .













. 12-1

. ;
;

HA








A


() 285 12

II

. 12-2
- .
1-
,
2- 1
,
.


2

-
.
,
, -
, - , ,
. . -
, -
- . 80% -
.
, .
, -
, - -
. , -,
- - . -
, -

, -
: , . -
, ,
. -
(. 12-4).
(.. - -
). - , ,
, - (,
, - ). -
, - -
-. ,
22 . , -
. , -
, .
. -
, , ,
,
(), ;
() .
, . -
(- .
) , ,
( ) - ,
, -
(. 12-3). . A
II 286

, Ill, VII, IX X
, -





T1-L3 -


,



S2-S4


. 12-3 . ; ; . (: Ganong W:
The autonomic nervous system. In Ganong W [ed]: Review of Medical Physiology, 15th ed. Norwalk, CT, Appleton & Lange, 1991, p 210.)

20 - .
, , ,
. , - .
-
- , -
, .
. , - , ,
, , , , -
, , .
. , -
.
,

.
III, -
VII, IX , - 1:1,
. 8000 .
,

. - . ,
.
,
.

-
, , -
. , , , -
* - , ,
, .
. -
. - ,
- ,
: ( ), .
( ). - ,
, . ,
- -
, - .
,
.
A * (. .) -
() 287 12




III





II
VII


IX


X




. 12-4 , -
. , -
, .
, , .
(Ruffolo R: Physiology and biochemistry of the peripheral autonomic nervous system. In Wingard L, Brody T, Larner J, et al [eds]: Human Pharmacology: Molecular to Clinical.
St. Louis, MosbyYear Book, 1991, p 77.)

. , .
-
, , .
. -
, -
, - . ,
. - ,
T8 L3 - -
, ,
; - . , -
, , -
, ,
- , , -
. , A
II 288

, . -
. -
, , , ,
- . -
. , ,
, ,
, - .
. ,
, (
, )
. .
- , -
, , -
- - .
; - -
( () (NO)
,
) , -, -
. P, ,
(VIP)
- (. 12-1) (. . 31).
; -

, -
. -

.
-
. , -
, , -
, ,
-
. (- .
) , -
, . 12-1 -
.
()
, .
( )
, - ,
, -
,
CCK8
-
. -
-1
.
,
, -
.
-

, , U ,
, - Y
,

. -

-
: . ,
-
(
)
- P ,
.
, , ,

-

. ,
, : Bishop A, Polak J: The gut and the autonomic nervous system.
A , -
In Mathias C, Bannister R (eds): Autonomic Failure: A Textbook of Clinical Disorders of
the Autonomic Nervous System, 4th ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, p 120
() 289 12
. 12-2 ,
(A
)


1
1

II

( ) 1 A
2 A
2 A

1 A

1 A

1 A

1 A

- 2


() 1 A
( )
()
( )

()

1 A


-
1 A,

1 A

2 A

1 A

1 A

1 A
()

Ruffolo R: Physiology and biochemistry of the peripheral autonomic nervous system. In Wingard L, Brody T, Larner J, et al (eds): Human Pharmacology: Molecular to
Clinical. St. Louis, MosbyYear Book, 1991, p 77
A ;

, -
, - , ,
. -.
-
, , - -
, - .
(. 12-2)1. -
. -
, , -
. , , , ,
, - , -
, .
() , -
, , -
-. , , -

(.. ), -
(. 12-3). .2 A
II 290

. 12-3 .12-5






(,

, ,
, )

-

-








()

(1) ,
,

(2)
(
; - , ,
(. 12-4). )
- (?)
- -- (2)
.
- (2)
2-, 1-,
2- (. 12-5). 2- -
(2)

,
, , (2)
, , . - (, )
- - (1)
-. - (2)
- (1)
(?)
; 2-
(?)
- ).

. 12-4

(1) 1-; (2) 2-; (?)



,
,
1- 2-
-
(,

, , (
, ) , ,
.
) -
,
, ,

,
- . , 1-
-
3 ,
2-
.
2-
(,
) (-
.
r -
1-)
, ,
(1) , -
. 85% -
(. 12-5).
A , -

() 291 12

+


Al All

II
. 12-5 -- +
-


Na+
. AI I; AII - Na+
II; --
; ;

+ ; - +
+



+ (1)

, , -
.4 . 2-

. ,
. - - -
.7-11
,
-
.5 ,

, , -
. ( -
),
,
--
.
.
, , ,
. , - -
- , , . ,
-
(.. ). ,
2 ;
2-. 2- - .
;
, .
, - ,
. 2- . ,
,
.6 .
-
, -,
(
. - ,
).
, -
, 2- -
. ,
, 2- . -
.
2- . - -
( ) ,
- - . -
(), ,
. .
- A
II 292

C , -
, , (. 12-6).


NO- EDRF ( .

. 31). , ,

, EDRF -

. ,
P2X P2Y
+ + - - - -
.
++ + NO

+ +
- - - - M P2X (. . 31).13 ,
NO, .

, -
/
5- I II,
P2Y -1
5- M
(ET-1). NO, ET-1 , -
,


. NO
,
-
. 12-6 -
- . (), - .
(), - (CGRP), P (SP)
(VIP) NO.
, , , -

. , (), 5- (5-HT) SP,
NO.
NO -
, , , .
(EDRF) - ; -
(PG), . ,
. , , -
, ,
. ; M ; .
P2X P2X-; P2Y P2Y. (Lincoln J, Burnstock NO -
G: Neural-endothelial interactions in control of local blood flow. In Warren J [ed]: The , ET-1
Endothelium: An Introduction to Current Research. New York, WileyLiss, 1990, p 21.)
. ET-1,
21 , -
. - , 39--
- , , big ET-1.
, ET-1
, , .14
. , NO, ET-1 -
-
- . .
,
, . NO- .
- ,
,
, . . ET-1
- , , ,
. , .
-
, ,
, , , , -
. , - .15,16 -
, NO . 31.
, , , -
.


-
,
, -
, in vivo
.
, ,
(EDRFs).12 -
A , (. 12-7).
() 293 12
OH


C=O

NH2CHCH2 OH

II

NH2
O



OH

=
CCHCH2
HO
OH


. 12-7
( NH2CH2CH2 OH
). A, .
OH
B, . (Tollenaer JP: Atlas
of the ThreeDimensional Structure of Drugs. Amsterdam,
Elsevier NorthHolland, 1979; as modified by Vanhoutte
PM: Adrenergic neuroeffector interaction in the blood
vessel wall. Fed Proc 37:181, 1978.)
--

OH

NH2CH2CH2 OH


OH

-N-

OH

CH3NHCH2CH OH

OH
A B

. - (),
- -
, (-) , -
- .
.17 ( -
) - ,
. - - -
---
- (DH).
,
. , -N- (PNMT),
85% . -
.
-
- ; , --
(TG). - -
TG, .
. .18
-
. TG -
. TG -
- . ,
. - -
, , . ,
. TG , -5--
, - ().
TG,
. - -
TG - . - A
II 294

Ca2+



Ca2+

. 12-8 . aad L- ; DH
--; L-; ; tyr hyb ; .
(Vanhoutte PM: Adrenergic neuroeffector interaction in the blood vessel wall. Fed Proc 37:181, 1978; as modified by Shepherd J, Vanhoutte P: Neurohumoral regulation. In
Shepherd S, Vanhoutte P [eds]: The Human Cardiovascular System: Facts and Concepts. New York, Raven Press, 1979, p 107.)

, -
. -
.
. -
-
, , - ,
. - .19-21 C
, 10% -
. , - - .22
1% ,
,
.

(.. -1) (..
, -2). -1
-
. - .
,
, , . -

, (, -
) (. . -
12-8). -
. - - ,
, . . -
, ,
, - , -
. II, - ().
, - .
E . 1991.
- -
. 23. .23,24 -
-
- - , -
, (.. ) -
. - .
, - -
A , , ,
() 295 12
. 12-6 -
().

, -
.25
(, ):
(, .26 -
-

II
):
,
(-1)
, -
,
, , ,
-
-1
.27,28


, -

-

. -


, - -
,
.29,30


-
-1
, -
, -- (COMT)
: Moore K: Drugs affecting the sympathetic nervous system. In
, , (. 12-9).
Wingard L, Brody T, Larner J, et al (eds): Human Pharmacology: Molecular to Clinical.
St. Louis, MosbyYear Book, 1991, p 114. ,
, .
. - -
, , (VMA). ,
( -
. ) , 1 .
. , - -
, .
, ,
; .. , -
. . , --
(. 12-6).
-1 VMA.
. - - .
- -
, , , . (),
, , -
. - ,
. .
, -
(, ), -
; .
, , -
.
25% , - .
, - ,
. . -
, -, -- , ,
- .
-
. - -1
. .
- ,
, - - . -
. . DH
- , , , -
, ,
, ,
. 10% . A
II 296

HO CHOH [MAO] HO CHOH [MAO] HO CHOH

HO CH2 HO C OH HO CH2

NH2 O HN CH3

3,4-

[] [] []

H3CO CHOH [MAO] H3CO CHOH [MAO] H3CO CHOH

HO CH2 HO C OH HO CH2

NH2 O HN CH3
3,4-

[] [MAO] [MAO] []

H3CO CHOH H3CO CHOH H3CO CHOH

RO CH2 HO CH2 RO CH2

NH2 OH HN CH3
--4-

. 12-9 . --; . (Lake CR, Chernow B, Feuerstein G, et al: The sympathetic


nervous system in man, its evaluation and the measurement of plasma norepinephrine. In Zigler M, Lake C [eds]: Frontiers of Clinical Neuroscience, vol 2. Baltimore, Williams
& Wilkins, 1984, p 1.)


1 2 1 2

1A1D 1B 1C 2A 2B 2C 1 2 3

Gq/11 Gi;Go Gs Gs/Go Gs/Gi



; ;
Ca2+, K+ Ca2+;

: :
:
(,
)

. 12-10 .


- -- (.
12-10).31 . 12-7 , , -
, . - -- 1-, 2-, 1- 2-.
--
.
, 1, , -
2, 1, 2 - -
A . - .32
() 297 12
. 12-7 - -

II

1- 1a/d-, 1b- 1c-- -


. 2- (2a-, . -
2b- 2-). 2- 2-
. 2- , , -
, .40
, , , - ,
, , - 2-.
.33
2- -
2a-.31,34 , -, -
, ,
, -. . -
, 2-, 2, 4 , 1-M7;
10- . - , -
35 ,
2- - , (. 12-11). -
1-, .

.36 , . -
-
, - G- , -
, - . -
, , -
G-. 175 -
.
. - - 1-, 2- 3-,
, , -
() -
. G-.41 , -
, , 1- ,
- 2- ,
.37 , 2- -
, 15%
. - 30 40% -
- . .42 2- -
, , ,
, 1-
- .43 2-
. ,
, - .44
, 2- -
. -
, - . ,
.38 2-,
- ,
, 2- - 1-.44 3-
. 2- .
- -
.39 - -
2- .45-47 ,
2-,
. - .48,49 A
II 298

NH2

. 12-11 --

.
-

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 . -
- . -

G- , --
(-ARK).
-
. (Opie L: Receptors and signal transduction. In

Opie LH [ed]: The Heart: Physiology and Metabolism.


New York, Raven Press, 1991.)

COOH

-
- - .50-53 DA2 -
, , , ; -
- - ( - , , .
). , Goldberg Raifer50 - DA2-,
,
: 1- (DA1) 2- (DA2) ,
- DA2-.
(. 12-12). DA1- ,
, , - (G-)
, - -
-
. , ,
- 1- - G-.
. - , , G-
- , -
. (. 12-13).
DA1- , , -

(-) 2 1
()
2

(-)

DA2
DA1 ()

. 12-12 1- (DA1), 1- 2-
DA2- 2- . DA1
, DA2- (-) () .
1- 2- , , 2-
A , .
, 1- 2-. (Goldberg LI, Rajfer SI: Dopamine receptors: Applications in clinical cardiology. Circulation 72:245, 1985.)
() 299 12
1.

7.

II
5.

3. G 4.
gly glu
2.
6.

phos-a

. 12-13 G- .
() G- ( Gs),
. () , , -
, (phos-a), : . (Linder
ME, Gilman AG: G Proteins. Sci Am 267:56, 1992.)

. - 2- -
G- Gi.
G-
; - . G- -
, , -
.54 G-, - . , -
, ,
. , , , -
G- , .56,57
, . - - - -
, -, -
. - - .
. ,
20 -. - G- .
- -
G-. -: s,i, q, .58
12. G- , - , --
, - -- (Gs) -
, Gs, Gi, Gq Go.55 . -
-
G-, . , -
. 1-, -
2- - Gq, Gi, Gs, , ,
(1), - Gi Go.
(2) () (.
. 12-10). G- - Gs Go. ,
() . Go, , , Gs, -
, - , -
G- -
() -, ,
. , -
G- , .58
-- -.
- , ,
, - , -
. -c -
-, G- ,
. . - ;
- G- 30
. - . -
- , --

( 400 .
) , 59 -
. - ,
, -- .
, ,
. - , - A
II 300

- . -
.60 , , -
-- ,
. , (. . 75).66
, -
(, ),
(downregulation). ,
--
, -,
,
, - -
Gs-. - -
, - .
G-, -- -
. -- . 14.
, .
, -
, ,
. - . -

- ; -
, . - (
)
, - ( ).
, -
- , - -
.61 - ,
- .
, -
. , . -
, - .
- , -, -
.62,63 , , -
, -
. .
- ,
, . -
( 4,4 , 5,9 .
) .
-
. , , .
-
, , -
. - (.
, - . 29)67, -
- - .
, -
. -
, -- ,
- , -
. , 1- .68
2-,64 , -
Bristow . , - . 14.
1- , -
2-. , 2- - ,
60% , - . - ( 40 )
-, - -.
40% .65 ,
- , .
: , . ,
. -
. - .
,
. ,
, G-.
A -
() 301 12
- -, - -
. , ,
(.. 2, 1, 2, , - -.
),
G- . -
( M1 M5), - ,
,

II

-
.

, -
(M1, M2, M3 M4), - -, , , -
. M2- , .
, -
. 2- 3- -
. , , , VIP,
in vitro , M3- - , 5- (, 5-HT),
. Y (NPY) -
2- (CGRP).
- - ,
.69 -
- ().
. (.. 1,
3 5)
,
.70

3- ,
Gq ,
-
.
,
.
.

(Y)
. , , -
, -
. Y
-
- -
, . + + +
(Y)
- P2 1
- A
.

-
.

, , -
.
-
. +
- Y

; + + +
-
Y
, . + Y


, . -
- B C

; - . 12-14 , -
. Y (NPY), ()
(), .
; A, , ,
, ,

, ,
. , (+) 1--
, . - and P2- , . B C, -
, , , (B) (C).
, - (Lincoln J, Burnstock G: Neural-endothelial interactions in control of local blood
.
flow. In Warren J [ed]: The Endothelium: An Introduction to Current Research. New
York, WileyLiss, 1990, p 21.)
A
II 302


, NPY
(. 12-14), VIP
(. 12-15 ) , CGRP -
- .
, ..
,
.
, , - +
, -

. -
,
,

.71


. , , -
,
+ +
, , -
- -


.


,

, 1- P2--
, , . 12-15 ()
(. . 12-14).72,73 -, (VIP)
, . VIP
, , ;
,
P2- - . -
- .74 VIP . -
, , - . (Burnstock G:
, Local mechanisms of blood flow control by perivascular nerves and endothelium. J
Hypertens Suppl 8:S95, 1990.)
, 1- -
- .
. -

.
. - - , -
5`-. (NO) .
, -
- . -
.75 , ,
1 .
2. P1- , P2 -
. P1-- -
(1, 2, 2 A3). P1- , ,
G-. P2-- -
(2 P2Y). 2- - .
- . ,
, P2Y- , -
G- -
. 2 (P2X1-7) .
P2Y (P2Y1, 2, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14).
P2Y- , .76,77 -
, ,
(), -
. .
AT, -
, - . -
. , MgCl2, , -
, .78
, - NPY
A . , . , NPY -
() 303 12
. 12-8
(), -


,
30 .

, -
, -

II
2 D2

30 M1-
N-,
.
-
4 - -
, ;


: Ganong W: The autonomic nervous system. In Ganong W (ed): .
Review of Medical Physiology, 15th ed. Norwalk, CT, Appleton & Lange, 1991, p 210.
-
D2 , G-;
; , -
: (1) , (2 )
(3)
().
;
-
, , .
, , -
(. . 12-14).79,80 -
, , , - .
, NPY -
. - .
()
NPY - -
(. . 12-14B). NPY, -, - , .
.

(. . 12-14).81 - , .
, - -
.
, ,
VIP
,
HO
.

,
HO CH2CH2NH2
, .82,83 ,

(. . 12-15).73
HO

VIP HO

CHCH2NH2
. -

. OH
, -
, 84, ,
HO

, ,
HO CHCH2NHCH3
-

. , - OH

.
HO

CH3


HO CHCH2NHCH

CH3
OH
,

HO

.
HO CH2CH2NHCHCH2CH2 OH
.

: CH3
-
(. 12-8).85
. 12-16 . -

A
II 304

. ,
.
, - .
. ,
; - .
, .
.
. : 1, 2,
- - 1, 2 3. -
, -
,
. - - (1);
, -- (2); (1).
. 5-HT ,
,
. ,
, . - , .86
-
, , , ,
, . .

.
2-8 ; 0,02 /
1 - -
, , , -

87 (. . 97). -
. - ,
-
. . (0,1-0,2
/) ,
, , ,
, - - .
. ,
- 0,01 /
, . 3-5 .41,88
,
, . 12-9

*
(
- )
, , - () 2 1-2/
(. 12-16). 1 + 2 2-10/
1 10/
-, (: 2-10;
. - 0,5-1,0)
3 4- () 1, 1, >>2 4-12/
(), -
() 0-3-1-1
. , -
3-10-1-1
. >10-1-1

. () 1 >> 2, 2,5-10-1-1
() 1 > 2 0,5-10/
COMT.
()
0,75 /
, 2-3,
COMT. 5 10
MAO. , - -1-1
-, - *
,
, COMT MAO. (3,6 ; 5,8 )




Hoffman BB, Lefkowitz RJ: Catecholamines and sympathetic drugs. In
A , ,
Goodman A, Rall T, Nies A, et al (eds): Goodman and Gilmans the Pharmacological
Basis of Therapeutics, 8th ed. New York, Pergamon Press, 1990, p 187
() 305 12
, 0,2 / - -
.89 . - -
, -
, -
;
, .
, - -

II
, - ,
(. 12-9). 1 2 /,
, , -
2-, .94 -
. 2 10 / ( 25 .
120 //) - -
, - - . -
. 10 / (100
//) - .
, , - 1-
. - (
, ), 2--
- . , -
. - -,
1-- -. (1)
, .95
- - ,
-
.
(.. .
) , .
90, , -
,
. 2,25%- (- 50% (ED50) 1,25 -
) - () 2,1 / -
1:8 , 6,7 / 10,9 / .96
. - , . -
2 , 30 , , ,
60 ; 10-15 / -
2 , 10 .89 -
2 .
.
-
, , L- 15-30
, 91, . ,
.92 - -,
- -. -
300 20
( ). .
, (2,5 ),
- . 2 / (30 //)
, - 1- ,
.93 - , , .. 3 /
, (50 //),
, - .
. -
- -
, .
(0,5-1,5 ) .
10-30 /. , ;
, .
, - ,
. -
.97
, , -
.
, -
- .
. , A
II 306

(, -
) . , .105,110-113

(. . 92 96).98 - . 1
, 6 -1-1 ,
. ,
. ,114-117

. .116,118-122
,
4 -1-1.123,124
-, - -
; .125-130 , -
, , -
. -
, 131 .132
- DA1-
. (
, ), -
, .133-137 - -
. -
MAO COMT 1
. , .
-
. (0,5-2,0 -1-1) - 0,1-0,8 -1-1 0,1
DA1- -1-1 -
.99 . ,
-
. (.. ,
2 10 -1-1 1-- )
- . 15
. .138,139
5 -1-1 -
,
. (10-20 -1- - -
-1) -, 1-; --
, -
, - -,
.100 -, -
: ,
( , .
). , (),
, , () .
.101 -
, - . -
,
, -
(. . 92 (. . 69). 1--
96).102,103
() - , -
, - .
( ) 2-
. 60 , .
2-, 2,5 25 25
, DA1-- 50 .
DA2-.104,105 ,
, -- 1--
, 1-- -
, , .
.104,106 - -
3-7 11 .
.107 2-
,
( .
).104-106,108,109 -
A , -
() 307 12
.
- , -
, - .145 -
. ,
, -
, , - .146 ,
. , -

II
, , ,
,
. .147 -
,
, -
(, ) , , -
,
- -
.140 . -
,
- 1- -
1-. .
, , , - .
, 2-
, , ,148
,
-
- -

. (-) .149,150
(5 10 ) , , -
. , -
40 100 -
10 20 /. (1 ) , ,
- -
. -
- .149,151-158 , -
. - 2-, -
, -

. ,
, - (. . 62).159
. , 1600 -
() - 2, 1-,160
( 30 60 ).141
-- , .161 -
. 2,3 ,
2- 5 162,
. .
. - -
, ,
2-- , -
. .160
- -
, , -
- ,
. .
, -
- ,
, , ,
. ,163,164
, .
2-
200:1 (2 1). - -
- (. . 92).165
-
- , 2-
, - , ,
.142-144 - A
II 308

. - . ,

.155, , -, -
166-180
.
, -
-
-
.181 , -
. -
, 2-, 1-, , -
: , , ,
,182-185 - 1- . -
186 , -
.187 - ,
2- .
- 2-, , 1--
(450 ) (1-2 //) - , . , -
,
. - .
, -
-.188,189 - ,
, , - ,
, 1-. -
, ,

- . 20 -1-1
.190,191 ,
2-
.
1-,
,
.192,193 - , .
, , --
.
2- 2-
1-
. ,
- -.
, , -
- , -
, ,
.194 2- .204
- ,
, ,
: 195; , .
, 196; -
197; -; -
-
. -
, .198 .205
, -

- ,206 .207
.199,200 , - . () -
, --
,
. , -. 1- -
2- - , 2-,
2- ,
201, .
( -
- .
)202 (. . 46 63), - ,
.203 ,
, - ACLS ( ) (.
A , , . 97).
() 309 12
- . 1- , -
. ,
, .
.
. - .
() 1--
- , 1-,

II
. - 2-. -
0,5-5 /. .
, - ,
, - 24
. . -
,
2- .
- , -
2- ; -
, 1- .
. -
2- - - . -
. 2-- ;
-
; , 2- ,
. , -
,
- .
. , ,
2-- , -
, - - . -
COMT. 1-
, .
- ,
. -
2- .
, - , -
, - 2- ,
2-.208-210 , .
2-- ,
, -
. , - ,
-
. , .212
()
. , 1- 2-. -
- -
(, ), (, - ,
) (, ). , . -
, 2-, - ,
. 2- ,
, -
. - . -
0,25 ,
15-30 . , -
2- , ;
(. . 69). () 10 5-10
. 2- . -
, , - -
. 2- - ; 2-
, . -
1-
-
. , - . ,
.211
, .
()
1- - 1-, -
, . - A
II 310

() ()
, - 6
5 CH3
4
OH
1 CHCH2NH CH

. -


, 2 CH3
OH OH
. -
, , -



. - CH3
. OCH2CHCH2NH CH


, , -


- (), - CH3
OH
. .
1, 2 5 ,
. 12-17 . (Tollenaer JP: Atlas
0,5-1 (-
of the ThreeDimensional Structure of Drugs. Amsterdam, Elsevier NorthHolland,
). 1979.)
.
2-, , , , , .
, -
. 1-, 2--
, , .
. 1- --
, -
,
.
- (.. -- 1--
) , 2-
, . , -
- .
, , ,
, - , , . -
, , -
. , , , -
-, - , .
, , --
. , -
-
- .220 ,
- . , -

, , - - ,
, -.
.213 -
- ,
214-218 .221,222
219 -- 1- 2-.
(. . 34). -, -
,
-. , , . : ,
- - , , , , -
, , . -
() - , ,
. : .
, - , ,
(. 12-10). -- ,
-. 2-
-, . ,
- (. 12-17). , -
- - , -
-
-. - - .
- -
. 1 , .223
. -.224
- -
A 1- 2- , , (),
() 311 12
- ( 2 : 68%
. 83% ). -
. - 216
, --
- . -
. , - ,
10 ,

II
-, , , . -
. , - , ,
, .225 , , -

(3,4% 34%). -
-. , -
1990-. ,
- -
, - -
(. . 34 35). -.227 , -
, :
- .
, POBBLE228 30- --
, ,
( -
( , - ). , DIPOM229
, , , -
).226 - ( ), -
215 200 . ,
,
, - 780000 -
-
, . , -
( . - -
) , - 3% ,
-- (
6-8 ).230 ,
, ,
. 12-10 -

+ + 0 0 + 0
-

0 0 0 + 0 0

0 0 ++ 0 0 *

(

)

() 6-9 3-4 3-4 6 9 2-8

50-100 50-100 4 60 4 100-600 25-50 2


2

5 5 x 0,1/ () 1-2/ 50-300 - 15


1
() 3 -1

*

; ; 0 ; + ; ++
A
II 312

- .
,
( -
).227 , .
- 238,239 ,
, --
,
( , 60-70 /), - . -
. - -
- , -
- ,
, . 1 -,240 -
-
- , - 1-,241
--
. -- -
,
( ) .242 -
.
- ,
, -
.243 -,
, - -
. - - (FDA), -
, - ,
(.. IV
. NYHA) -
- - .
- ,
.231
. ,
3 - -.244
, - . ,
(. - , .
. 35). -
, -
. - -
, -. , , .
-
; -, . -
15-20%
. 60% . , ,
, 2- - ,
- - .245 -
, -
. - .246 -
, ,
.247

.232-235 - -
, , . ,
236 , -
.237 , -
- (, , - . ,
, )
. , -
, -
60-80 / . , - -
.
. 60 .
5-10 - - . -
- II
. (. . 35, 60 61). :
- - , ,
- , , -
A . - .248 --
() 313 12
,
,
-, .
-.
- - - , -
,249 -
. , - ,

II
re-entry, - , , -
- . , -
, QT,
. , -
, -- .
(,
), - -
, ,
. , - - . -
III , - , , ,
; , -
D- , , .255 -
D-.250 -
, , -
.
, .251 . -
. - , -
, -
, .
(. . 61). -
.256
- -
(dp/dt) -. -
-,
, -,257,258 -
-.252 - , -
.253 , ,
. [] .
- -
(. . 75). - - -
, .
. - -
.
-. - ,
- -
.254 -. ,
. () , -
() -, .
. - -
. .
- -
-. - - , -
- , ( )

. - .
, ,

. , ,
,
[]
, .
, . ,
, , -
, . - . -
, - ,
- - , -
. - . -
- -
. . A
II 314

, ,266 -274
, ,
. .275 -279
, , (II IV NYHA)
, ,237, 238, 280, 281
. .282
. (, ) . -
-, -- () -
, . . (9-10 ), -
- .
, - - -
. , (-
: 10 , )
320 . - .
5-10
. ( 20-30 ). -
. 4 , - ,
, 0,5 / -
- . .
, -
. 500 / 1
. - 50 -1-1 4 . -
0,1 /, - , ,
4-
, 0,25-0,5 , . 100 -1-1.
- 50 -1-1
, , , - 200 300 -1-1, .
.259 20-30
. () . ,
. - .248
. , -
, .283-285
,
. -
100-200 /, - - , .
.
2,5-5 2-5 15 .286,287

. , ,
. (, ) -
, -
1- -. , -
, 1-, 1- .
2-, - ()
(-1), -
2- , , - ,
. 5-10 -, -.213 ,
-. - (. .
200-400 , 12-7). , -
. , -. -
. - ,
. ,
5 5-10 - , .
2 /. - --
- .260 , 2-,
,
,252 261,262 . - -
,263 , ,
-, - , , ,
.
.
.264 - (, )
- TH,
(. . 69).265 (. . 12-7). , -
. - -- ,
A
() 315 12
- ()
. , , -
, , -
, , .288
-
. - , .
. , ,

II
() , - ,
, - .
-
-1 . - -
, , .
. - ,
- . -
. -
() , ,
. .
, III , , -
, . -
, , ,
. - ,
, . -
, , ,
. .
, , -
. , .
. , -
.
, , -
.234 , . -
, , , ,
ACLS , .
. -
MAO COMT - ,
. ,
. -
.
, -
. , - .289,290 -
, ,
. , , - . -
MAO.
. ,
, -
-1, -
DH . ,
, -
, .
.

, , -
-.
-
. -
, -
. - .
MAO , II ,
.
: - .
(), () - . , -
(). II, .
, -
MAO. MAO-A ,
5-HT, , , , , ,
MAO-B . I. I -
MAO-B - II - - A
II 316

(). ARBs ;
. -
, -
II - .298


. II
,

, -
- , , -
. , . -
. , ;
II - ,
, , , , -
.291 , .
,
-
, 70% ,
. - , .
, -
(, , :
),
, - 1. ,
-
2. ,
.213 , -

, 3.
.292 ()
, 4. ,
() .
(, ). --
- , ,
.293,294 ( -
, . )
. . ,
. ,
, , .
, -
. , ; -
, ,
, . -
, . , -
, - .
, ,
, , ,
, - .
. , .
, , , ,
, ,
.295,296 - .
.291,297
, . -
, , -
, - . -
,
, , -
, -
. .
.
.293 - , -
, ,
II (ARBs). , -
- .
, -
A ARBs. - , ,
() 317 12
. 12-11

+ ++

0 ++ +

II
++ 0/+

* ,
0 ; + ; ++

, , - .
, - , -
. .
; - -
. -
- ,
, . -
,
.
; , -
;
- -
. - , -
() (. 12-11).
, , -
- ,
. . -
; M1-, -
: --
, , , M2- , -
. - M3-. -
-; -
-
. . , , ,
-
() , -

. .
,
, - ,
,
- . . , -
, -
- , , (H2) , , -
, . .
- , - -
, 2-,
. - -
, - .
, -
, .
.

. , ,
,
. -
.
-
-, -
, .
. ,
, (. 12-18).
-
. (1-2 ),
- -
- , (. A
II 318

. 29). , -
, (), -
- . (-
, , ), ,
. - . ,
, . , -
,
, - . , -
. - ,
.
,
. - .
-
, , -
, , , ,
, - . , -
, .299,300 . -
()
, . ,
.301 500 ( 1000
, , ),
, , .
, (0,05 ) -
. ; ,
, . , -
. ,
[- , , -
], 1% ,
. . -
, -
, - , , , -
. , .302
, . -
,
, , (), -
- , -
. , - .
, -. - 1-2 -
,
. , .
, , -
-
, .298 - , ,
, 18
. . -
. - , -
30-90 4 .
() .303 -
CH3 O -
,
=

CO

-
O CH2OH
N , ,
OH

=

OCCH
H3C CH3 .



CH3

N
, -
. -

-

O O CH2OH
.

=

OCCH
: , -

. ,
,
. 12-18
A

.
() 319 12
, . -
, . - , , -
- .
, .
, -
15-20 . (. . 12-3).
, , ,

II
, , , VX - .
, . -

,
, -
(. . 74). -

. -
, -
- ,
, ,304 -
. .

(2-PAM). - - (. . 35).305
-
(. ,
. 74). ,

- . , -
, , , -
, , - ,
. - , -
. -
. - ,
, - -
, (), . -
- ,
.
- .
. - -
, . -
. - ,
1 , ,
- -
(. 12-12). -
. 20/
, ,
- .


- .
, -
.
, .

, -
. -
, , .
-
, , , 100 400 /,
.
. ,
,
() , . -
-
-
1950- 1960- . - , , .5 ,
-
, , , A
II 320

, -
. , . -

. -
- - -
, .307,308
, -
.
- in vivo -
, , , -
10 20% . ,
, -
,
.306 ,
- ,
- (<8%) .
, -
- , -
. - (25%
)
. 12-12 (>80%) .
,
,
,
, -
.309
>
( 40 . .) 1,21
, -
15 . , ,
R-R ,
(
) R-R . ,
(
)

> -
1,04 .
. , , ,
,
15-


.
-
30- , -
. (>1000 /)
30:15 .
R-R
30-
R-R

15-
1 ,
. > ,
15 / . ,
,
,
(
)
,
-.310 -
- ,
,

,
< . -
, 10 . , --
.
.


>
30% 5 16 . .
. , .




,
; ; .
A ;

,
() 321 12
-
, - . -
, , -
.311 - ,
5-
50%.
. - ,

II
,
, -, . .314
-- , ,
,
, -
.312 . vasa vasorum -
,
, - -
, . -
. - , -
- , ,
, ,
.
24 -- -
, -, , , . -
, ,
.310 , - .
, , - , ,
,
, - .

-
.
,
.314 Page Watkins315
(. -
-).215 ,
- . -
-
-,216,217,219 - ,
. , ,
- 96% .316
2- -
.313 ,
, - .304
2-, -
.


- ,
- -
(. . 35). 20-40% -
- . , (. . 71).
, - ( 20%)
-
, . . -
,
, ,
, . .317

-
, ( 13% ), - -
- .318 ,
- , , -
.
, ,319
. -
, - , ,
, . A
II 322

,
,320 .
- -
, -
, . ,
, ,
.306 , ,
(.. -
) - , 35% .326 -
. ,
- - , -
1- (.. .
) 2--
Gs-.321
, -
.322 , . -

2 -
,323-325 - . -
, .
-- .327
- ,
. , ,
-, - . ,
,
2- . , -
-
- 2- - .
- .
- , -
- -
- , . ---
.
,

.

, -
.
(. . 46, 63 72). -
, ,
, -
. .

, -.
- ,
, , - , ,
. .
, ,
. ,
. .

. , -

. -
, -,328 -
- , -
, - . . -
, - ,

- . , -
.
.326
- 5-10
. - .
A . ,
() 323 12
, , .
.
, .
5. -
, - . ,
, , (single-
. nucleotide polymorphism SNP),

II
- , ,
. . SNP, ,
, ,
,
- (,
. 1d-).
, , , ,
, .329
, . -
, ,
, . , -
, , G-.330
, . -
-
. (, -
, -
-, - 331),
. - -
. . -
,
, -
. ,
,
, -
( SNP -
),
. -
, -
, ,

- -
, .


1. Ruffolo R: Physiology and biochemistry of the 10. Brown M: Hypokalemia from 2-receptor stimu- and morphine on histamine-induced catechol
peripheral autonomic nervous system. In Wingard lation by circulating epinephrine. Am J Cardiol amine secretion from cultured, bovine adrenal
L, Brody T, Larner J, et al (eds): Human Pharma- 56:3D, 1985. chromaffin cells. Br J Pharmacol 89:327, 1986.
cology: Molecular-to-Clinical. St. Louis, Mosby 11. Vincent HH, ManInt Veld AJ, Boomsma F, et al: 20. Marley PD, Livett BG: Differences between the
Year Book, 1991, p 77. Prevention of epinephrine-induced hypokalemia mechanism of adrenaline and noradrenaline
2. Fleisher LA, Frank SM, Shir Y, et al: Cardiac sym- by nonselective beta blockers. Am J Cardiol secretion from isolated, bovine, adrenal chromaf-
pathovagal balance and peripheral sympathetic 56:10D, 1985. fin cells. Neurosci Lett 77:81, 1987.
vasoconstriction: Epidural versus general anes- 12. Johns RA: EDRF/nitric oxide: The endogenous 21. Owen PJ, Plevin R, Boarder MR: Characterization
thesia. Anesth Analg 79:165, 1994. nitrovasodilator and a new cellular messenger. of bradykinin-stimulated release of noradrenaline
3. Hoffman B, Lefkowitz R: Adrenergic receptors in Anesthesiology 75:927, 1991. from cultured bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. J
the heart. Annu Rev Physiol 44:475, 1982. 13. Snyder SH, Bredt DS: Biological roles of nitric Pharmacol Exp Ther 248:1231, 1989.
4. Radu A, Dahl G, Loewenstein WR: Hormonal oxide. Sci Am 266:68, 1992. 22. Cahill A, Perlman RL: Phorbol esters cause pref-
regulation of cell junction permeability: Upregu- 14. Sakurai T, Yanagisawa M, Masaki T: Molecular erential secretion of norepinephrine from bovine
lation by catecholamine and prostaglandin E1. J characterization of endothelin receptors. Trends chromaffin cells. J Neurochem 58:768, 1992.
Membr Biol 70:239, 1982. Pharmacol Sci 13:103, 1992. 23. Pacholczyk T, Blakely RD, Amara SG: Expression
5. Dimsdale J, Moss J: Plasma catecholamines in 15. Nava E, Palmer R, Moncada S: Inhibition of nitric cloning of a cocaine and antidepressant sensitive
stress and exercise. JAMA 243:340, 1980. oxide synthesis in septic shock: How much is ben- human noradrenaline transporter. Nature
6. Philipson LH: -Agonists and metabolism. J eficial? Lancet 338:1555, 1991. 350:350, 1991.
Allergy Clin Immunol 110:S313, 2001. 16. Moore K, Wendon J, Frazer M, et al: Plasma
24. Eisenhofer G: The role of neuronal and extraneu-
7. Kharasch ED, Bowdle T: Hypokalemia before endothelin immunoreactivity in liver disease and ronal plasma membrane transporters in the inac-
induction of anesthesia and prevention by 2 the hepatorenal syndrome. N Engl J Med tivation of peripheral catecholamines. Pharmacol
adrenoceptor antagonism. Anesth Analg 72:216, 327:1774, 1992. Ther 91:35, 2001.
1991. 17. Conlay L, Maher TJ, Wurtman RJ: Tyrosine
25. Moss J, Lappas D, Slater E: Role of the rennin
8. Williams ME, Gervino EV, Rosa RM, et al: increases blood pressure in hypotensive rats. catecholamine system in hemodynamic perfor-
Catecholamine modulation of rapid potassium Science 212:559, 1981. mance in man. In Usdin E, Kvetnansky R, Kopin
shifts during exercise. N Engl J Med 312:823, 1985. 18. Nussdorfer GG: Pancrine control of adrenal corti- IJ (eds): Catecholamines and Stress: Recent
9. Struthers AD, Reid JL: The role of adrenal medul- cal function by medullary chromaffin cells. Phar- Advances in Neurosciences. New York, Elsevier,
lary catecholamines in potassium homoeostasis. macol Rev 48:495, 1996. 1980, p 513.
Clin Sci 66:377, 1984. 19. Livett BG, Marley PD: Effects of opioid peptides 26. Kaye DM, Lambert GW, Lefkovits J, et al:
A
II 324

Neurochemical evidence of cardiac sympathetic increased capacity to gain weight in patients with the train-of-four fade. Anesthesiology 105:521,
activation and increased central nervous system morbid obesity. N Engl J Med 333:352, 1995. 2006.
norepinephrine turnover in severe congestive 48. Hall IP, Wheatley A, Wilding P, et al: Association 68. Tassonyi E, Charpantier E, Muller D, et al: The
heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:570, 1994. of Glu27 2-adrenoceptor polymorphism with role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the
27. Cohn J, Levine T, Olivari M, et al: Plasma nore lower airway reactivity in asthmatic subjects. mechanisms of anesthesia. Brain Res Bull 57:133,
pinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients Lancet 345:1213, 1995. 2002.
with chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J 49. Turki J, Pak J, Green SA, et al: Genetic polymor- 69. Eglen RM, Hedge SS, Watson N: Muscarinic

Med 311:819, 1984. phisms of the 2-adrenergic receptor in nocturnal receptor subtypes and smooth muscle function.
28. Bristow M: The adrenergic nervous system in
and non-nocturnal asthma: Evidence that Gly 16 Pharmacol Rev 48:531, 1996.
heart failure [editorial]. N Engl J Med 311:850, correlates with the nocturnal phenotype. J Clin 70. Hosey MM: Diversity of structure, signaling and
1984. Invest 95:1635, 1995. regulation within the family of muscarinic cholin-
29. Eisenhofer G, Friberg P, Rundqvist B, et al:
50. Goldberg LI, Rajfer SI: Dopamine receptors:
ergic receptors. FASEB J 12:845, 1992.
Cardiac sympathetic nerve function in congestive Applications in clinical cardiology. Circulation 71. Bartfai T, Iverfeldt K, Fisone G, et al: Regulation
heart failure. Circulation 93:1667, 1996. 72:245, 1985. of the release of coexisting neurotransmitters.
30. Port JD, Gilbert EM, Larrabee P, et al: Neurotrans- 51. Bertorello A, Aperia A: Both DA1 and DA2 recep- Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 28:285, 1988.
mitter depletion compromises the ability of indirect- tor agonists are necessary to inhibit Na+/K+ 72. Von Kgelgen I, Starke K: NoradrenalineATP
acting amines to provide inotropic support in ATPase activity in proximal tubules from the rat co-transmission in the sympathetic nervous
the failing human heart. Circulation 81:929, kidney. Acta Physiol Scand 132:441, 1988. system. Trends Pharmacol Sci 12:319, 1991.
1990. 52. Bertorello A, Aperia A: Regulation of Na+/K+
73. Burnstock G: Local mechanisms of blood flow
31. Lawhead R, Blaxall H, Bylund D: 2A is the pre- ATPase activity in kidney proximal tubules: control by perivascular nerves and endothelium.
dominant 2-adrenergic receptor subtype in Involvement of GTP binding proteins. Am J J Hypertens Suppl 8:S95, 1990.
human spinal cord. Anesthesiology 77:983, 1992. Physiol 256:F57, 1989. 74. Ralevic V, Burnstock G: Receptors for purines and
32. Bylund DB: Subtypes of 1 and 2 adrenergic 53. Gesek FA, Schoolwerth AC: Hormonal interac- pyrimidines. Pharmacol Rev 50:413, 1998.
receptors. FASEB J 6:832, 1992. tions with the proximal Na+/H+ exchanger. Am J 75. Jacobson KA, Trivedi BK, Churchill PC, et al:
33. Szabo B, Hedler L, Starke K: Peripheral presynap- Physiol 258:F514, 1990. Novel therapeutics acting via purine receptors.
tic and central effects of clonidine, yohimbine and 54. Linder ME, Gilman AG: G Proteins. Sci Am
Biochem Pharmacol 41:1399, 1991.
rauwolscine on the sympathetic nervous system 267:56, 1992. 76. Burnstock G: Overview: Purinergic mechanisms.
in rabbits. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharma- 55. Sprang SR: G protein mechanisms: Insights from Ann N Y Acad Sci 603:1, 1990.
col 340:648, 1989. structural analysis. Annu Rev Biochem 66:639, 77. Goncalves J, Guimaraes S: Influence of neuronal
34. Ongioco RR, Richardson CD, Rudner XL, et al: 1997. uptake on pre- and postjunctional effects of
2-Adrenergic receptors in human dorsal root 56. Alousi AA, Jasper JR, Insel PA, et al: Stoichiom- -adrenoceptor agonists in tissues with noradren-
ganglia: Predominance of 2b and 2c subtype etry of receptor Gs-adenylate cyclase interactions. aline: ATP cotransmission. Nauryn Schmiede-
mRNAs. Anesthesiology 92:968, 2000. FASEB J 5:2300, 1991. bergs Arch Pharmacol 344:532, 1991.
35. Michelotti GA, Price DT, Schwinn DA:
57. Post SR, HilalDandan R, Urasawa K, et al: Quan- 78. Hirst G, Bramich N, Edwards F, et al: Transmis-
1-Adrenergic receptor regulation: Basic science tification of signaling components and amplifica- sion at autonomic neuroeffector junctions. Trends
and clinical implications. Pharmacol Ther 88:281, tion in the -adrenergic receptor-adenylate Neurosci 15:40, 1992.
2000. cyclase pathway in isolated adult rat ventricular 79. Walker P, Grouzmann E, Burnie M, et al: The role
36. Small KM, Wagoner LE, Levin AM, et al: Syner- myocytes. Biochem J 311:75, 1995. of neuropeptide Y in cardiovascular regulation.
gistic polymorphisms of 1- and 2c-adrenergic 58. Yatani A, Okabe K, Codina J, et al: Heart rate Trends Pharmacol Sci 12:111, 1991.
receptors and the risk of congestive heart failure. regulation by G proteins acting on the cardiac 80. Lincoln J, Burnstock G: Neural-endothelial interac-
N Engl J Med 347:1135, 2002. pacemaker channel. Science 249:1163, 1990. tions in control of local blood flow. In Warren J (ed):
37. Michel MC, Kenny B, Schwinn DA: Classification 59. BlochlDaum B, SchullerPetrovic S, Wolzt M, et The Endothelium: An Introduction to Current
of 1-adrenoceptor subtypes. Naunyn Schmiede- al: Primary defect in -adrenergic responsiveness Research. New York, WileyLiss, 1990, p 21.
bergs Arch Pharmacol 352:1, 1995. in patients with varicose veins. Clin Pharmacol 81. Lundberg JM, Rudehill A, Sollevi A, et al:

38. Boehm S, Kubista H: Fine tuning of sympathetic Ther 49:49, 1991. Frequency- and reserpine-dependent chemical
transmitter release via ionotropic and metabo- 60. Insel PA: Adrenergic receptors: Evolving concepts coding of sympathetic transmission: Differential
tropic presynaptic receptors. Pharmacol Rev and clinical implications. N Engl J Med 334:580, release of noradrenaline and neuropeptide Y from
54:43, 2002. 1996. pig spleen. Neurosci Lett 63:96, 1986.
39. Szabo B, Schramm A, Starke K: Effect of yohim- 61. Bristow MR, Ginsburg R, Minobe W, et al:
82. Bloom S, Edwards A: Vasoactive intestinal poly-
bine on renal sympathetic nerve activity and renal Decreased catecholamine sensitivity and peptide in relation to atropine resistant vasodila-
norepinephrine spillover in anesthetized rabbits. -adrenergic receptor density in failing human tation in the submaxillary gland of the cat. J
J Pharmacol Exp Ther 260:780, 1992. hearts. N Engl J Med 307:205, 1982. Physiol 300:41, 1980.
40. Limberger N, Singer EA, Starke K: Only activated 62. Menard L, Ferguson SS, Zhang J, et al: Synergistic 83. Lundberg JM: Evidence for coexistence of vasoac-
but not non-activated presynaptic 2-autoreceptors regulation of 2-adrenergic receptor sequestra- tive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and acetylcho-
interfere with neighbouring presynaptic receptor tion: Intracellular complement of -adrenergic line in neurons of cat exocrine glands:
mechanisms. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Phar- receptor kinase and -arrestin determine kinetics Morphological, biochemical and functional
macol 338:62, 1988. of internalization. Mol Pharmacol 51:800, 1997. studies. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 112:1, 1981.
41. Raymond J, Hnatowich M, Lefkowitz R, et al: Adr- 63. Ferguson SS, Barak LS, Zhang J, et al: G-protein- 84. Mione M, Cavanagh J, Lincoln J, et al: Pregnancy
energic receptors: Models for regulation of signal coupled receptor regulation: Role of G-protein- reduces noradrenaline but not neuropeptide
transduction processes. Hypertension 15:119, coupled receptor kinases and arrestins. Can J levels in the uterine artery of the guinea-pig. Cell
1990. Physiol Pharmacol 74:1095, 1996. Tissue Res 259:503, 1990.
42. Vanhees L, Aubert A, Fagard R, et al: Influence of 64. Bristow M, Ginsburg R, Umans V, et al: 1- and 85. Glusman S: Electrophysiology of ganglionic

1- versus 2-adrenoceptor blockade on left ven- 2-adrenergic receptor subpopulations in non- transmission in the sympathetic nervous system.
tricular function in humans. J Cardiovasc Phar- failing and failing human ventricular myocar- Int Anesthesiol Clin 27:273, 1989.
macol 8:1086, 1986. dium: Coupling of both receptor subtypes to 86. Paradis NA, Martin GB, Rivers EP, et al: Coronary
43. Opie L: Ventricular overload and heart failure. In muscle contraction and selective 1 receptor perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous
Opie LH (ed): The Heart: Physiology and Metabo- downregulation in heart failure. Circ Res 59:297, circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscita-
lism, 2nd ed. New York, Raven Press, 1991, p 386. 1986. tion. JAMA 263:1106, 1990.
44. Brodde O: The functional importance of 1 and 2 65. Hedberg A, Kemp F Jr, Josephson ME, et al: Co- 87. Management of cardiac arrest. Circulation

adrenoceptors in the human heart. Am J Cardiol existence of 1 and 2-adrenergic receptors in the 112:IV58, 2005.
62:24C, 1988. human heart: Effects of treatment with receptor 88. Pediatric advanced life support. Circulation

45. Walston J, Silver K, Bogardus C, et al: Time of antagonists or calcium entry blockers. J Pharma- 112:IV167, 2005.
onset of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus col Exp Ther 234:561, 1985. 89. Goetting M, Paradis N: High-dose epinephrine
and genetic variation in the 3-adrenergic- 66. Dratman M, Crutchfield F, Axelrod J, et al: Locali- improves outcome from pediatric cardiac arrest.
receptor gene. N Engl J Med 333:343, 1995. zation of triiodothyronine in nerve ending frac- Ann Emerg Med 20:22, 1991.
46. Widen E, Lehto M, Kanninen T, et al: Association tions of rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73:941, 90. Berry F: Clinical pharmacology of inhalational
of a polymorphism in the 3-adrenergic receptor 1976. anesthetic, muscle relaxants, vasoactive agents,
gene with features of the insulin resistance syn- 67. Jonsson M, Gurley D, Dabrowski M, et al: Distinct and narcotics, and techniques of general anesthe-
drome in Finns. N Engl J Med 333:348, 1995. pharmacologic properties of neuromuscular sia. In Berry F (ed): Anesthetic Management of
47. Clement K, Vaisse C, Manning BSF, et al: Genetic blocking agents on human neuronal nicotinic ace- Difficult and Routine Pediatric Patients, 2nd ed.
A variation in the 3-adrenergic receptor and an tylcholine receptors: A possible explanation for New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1990, p 64.
() 325 12
91. Waisman Y, Klein BL, Boenning DA, et al: Pro- tized dogs. J Auton Pharmacol 10(Suppl):S95, pam: A DA-1 receptor agonist. Drug Dev Res
spective randomized double-blind study compar- 1990. 10:123, 1987.
ing l-epinephrine and racemic epinephrine 114. Leier CV, Binkley PF, Carpenter J, et al: Cardio- 135. Goldberg LI: Dopamine and new dopamine

aerosols in the treatment of laryngotracheitis vascular pharmacology of dopexamine in low analogs: Receptors and clinical applications. J Clin
(croup). Pediatrics 89:302, 1992. output congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol Anesth 1:66, 1988.
92. Nutman J, Brooks LJ, Deakins KM, et al: Racemic 62:94, 1988. 136. Aronson S, Goldberg L, Roth S, et al: Preservation
versus l-epinephrine aerosol in the treatment of 115. Baumann G, Felix SB, Filcek SAL: Usefulness of of renal blood flow during hypotension induced
postextubation laryngeal edema: Results from a dopexamine hydrochloride versus dobutamine in with fenoldopam in dogs. Can J Anaesth 37:380,

II
prospective, randomized double-blind study. Crit chronic congestive heart failure and the effects on 1990.
Care Med 22:1591, 1994. hemodynamics and urine output. Am J Cardiol 137. Aronson S, Goldberg LI, Roth S, et al: Effects of
93. Bochner BS, Lichtenstein L: Anaphylaxis. N Engl 65:748, 1990. fenoldopam on renal blood flow and systemic
J Med 324:1785, 1991. 116. Colardyn FC, Vandenbogaerde FE: Use of dopex- hemodynamics during isoflurane anesthesia in
94. Donlon J, Moss J: Plasma catecholamine levels amine hydrochloride in intensive care patients dogs. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 5:29, 1991.
during local anesthesia for cataract operations. with low-output left ventricular heart failure. Am 138. Shusterman NH, Elliott WJ, White WB: Fenoldo-
Anesthesiology 51:471, 1979. J Cardiol 62:68C, 1988. pam, but not nitroprusside, improves renal func-
95. Houben H, Thien T, vant Laar A: Effect of low- 117. Friedel N, Wenzel R, Matheis G, et al: Haemody- tion in severely hypertensive patients with
dose epinephrine on hemodynamics after selec- namic effects of different doses of dopexamine impaired renal function. Am J Med 95:161, 1993.
tive and nonselective beta-blockade in hydrochloride in low cardiac output states follow- 139. Pilmer BL, Green JA, Panacek EA, et al: Fenoldo-
hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther 31:685, 1982. ing cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 13:1271, 1992. pam mesylate versus sodium nitroprusside in the
96. Johnston R, Eger E, Wilson C: A comparative 118. Bredle DL, Cain SM: Systemic and muscle oxygen acute management of severe system hypertension.
interaction of epinephrine with enflurane, isoflu- uptake delivery after dopexamine infusion in J Clin Pharmacol 33:549, 1993.
rane, and halothane in man. Anesth Analg 55:709, endotoxic dogs. Crit Care Med 19:198, 1991. 140. Caplan R, Ward R, Posner K, Cheney F: Unex-
1976. 119. Cain SM, Curtis SE: Systemic and regional oxygen pected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: A
97. ONeill MJ Jr, Pennock JL, Seaton JF, et al:
uptake and delivery and lactate flux in endotoxic closed claims analysis of predisposing factors.
Regional endogenous plasma catecholamine con- dogs infused with dopexamine. Crit Care Med Anesthesiology 68:5, 1988.
centrations in pulmonary hypertension. Surgery 19:1552, 1991. 141. Shibata S, Seriguchi DG, Iwadare S, et al: The
84:140, 1978. 120. Colardyn FC, Vandenbogaerde JF, Vogelaers DP, regional and species differences on the activation
98. Schafer G, Fink M, Parillo J: Norepinephrine
et al: Use of dopexamine hydrochloride in patients of myocardial -adrenoreceptors by phenyl
alone versus norepinephrine plus low dose dopa- with septic shock. Crit Care Med 17:999, 1989. ephrine and methoxamine. Gen Pharmacol
mine: Enhanced renal blood flow with combina- 121. Preiser JC, Arminstead C, Le Minh T, et al:
11:173, 1980.
tion pressor therapy. Crit Care Med 13:492, 1985. Increase in oxygen supply during experimental 142. DeVos H, Bricca G, DeKeyser J, et al: Imidazoline
99. Goldberg L: Dopamine: Clinical uses of an endog- septic shock: The effects of dobutamine versus receptors, non-adrenergic idazoxan binding sites
enous catecholamine. N Engl J Med 291:707, dopexamine. J Crit Care 4:40, 1989. and 2-adrenoceptors in the human central
1974. 122. Webb AR, Moss RF, Tighe D, et al: The effects of nervous system. Neuroscience 59:589, 1994.
100. Goldberg LI, Hsieh Y-Y, Resnekov L: Newer cat- dobutamine, dopexamine and fluid on hepatic 143. Hamilton CA: The role of imidazoline receptors
echolamines for treatment of heart failure and histological response to porcine faecal peritonitis. in blood pressure regulation. Pharmacol Ther
shock: An update on dopamine and a first look at Intensive Care Med 17:487, 1991. 54:231, 1992.
dobutamine. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 19:327, 1977. 123. Hakim M, Foulds R, Latimer RD, et al: Dopexam- 144. Guyenet PG, Cabot JB: Inhibition of sympathetic
101. Maskin C, Oken S, Chadwick B, et al: Compara- ine hydrochloride, a 2-adrenergic and dopamin- preganglionic neurons by catecholamines and clo-
tive systemic and renal effects of dopamine and ergic agonist: Haemodynamic effects following nidine: Mediation by an -adrenergic receptor. J
angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor with cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 9:853, 1988. Neurosci 1:908, 1981.
enalapril in patients with heart failure. Circulation 124. Macgregor DA, Butterworth JF IV, Zaloga GP, et 145. Ruffolo RR Jr: Distribution and function of

72:846, 1985 al: Hemodynamic and renal effects of dopexamine peripheral -adrenoceptors on the cardiovascular
102. Holmes CL, Walley KR: Bad medicine: Low-dose and dobutamine in patients with reduced cardiac system. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:827, 1985.
dopamine in the ICU. Chest 123:1266, 2003. output following coronary artery bypass grafting. 146. Muzi M, Goff D, Kampine J, et al: Clonidine

103. Jones D, Bellomo R: Renal-dose dopamine: From Chest 106:835, 1994. reduces sympathetic activity but maintains
hypothesis to paradigm to dogma to myth and 125. Smithies M, Yee TH, Jackson L, et al: Protecting baroreflex res ponses in normotensive humans.
finally, superstition? J Int Care Med 20:199, 2005. the gut and the liver in the critically ill: Effects of Anesthesiology 77:864, 1992.
104. Brown RA, Dixon J, Farmer JB, et al: Dopexam- dopexamine. Crit Care Med 22:789, 1994. 147. Aho M, Erkola O, Korttila K: 2-Adrenergic ago-
ine: A novel agonist at peripheral dopamine 126. Lund N, de Asla RJ, Papadakos PJ, et al: Dopex- nists in anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 5:481,
receptors and 2-adrenoceptors. Br J Pharmacol amine hydrochloride in septicemia: Effects on gut, 1992.
85:599, 1985. liver and muscle oxygenation [abstract]. Crit Care 148. Ramsay MA, Luterman DL: Dexmedetomidine
105. Foulds RA: Clinical development of dopexamine Med 20(Suppl 4):46, 1992. as a total intravenous anesthetic. Anesthesiology
hydrochloride (Dopacard) and an overview of its 127. Trinder TJ, Lavery GG, Fee JPH, et al: Correction 101:787, 2004.
hemodynamic effects. Am J Cardiol 62:41C, 1988. of splanchnic oxygen deficit in the intensive care 149. Flacke J, Bloor BC, Flacke WE, et al: Reduced
106. Smith GW, OConnor SE: An introduction to the unit: Dopexamine and colloid versus placebo. narcotic requirement by clonidine with improved
pharmacologic properties of Dopacard (dopex- Anaesth Intensive Care 23:178, 1995. hemodynamic and adrenergic stability in patients
amine hydrochloride). Am J Cardiol 62:9C, 1988. 128. Kuhly P, Oschmann G, Specht M, et al: Dopexam- undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Anesthesi-
107. Fitton A, Benfield P: Dopexamine hydrochloride: ine hydrochloride does not improve gastric and ology 67:11, 1987.
A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharma- sigmoid mucosal acidosis in patients with sepsis 150. Maze M, Tranguilli W: 2-Adrenoreceptor ago-
cokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in [abstract]. Br J Anesth 74(Suppl 1):121, 1995. nists: Defining the role in clinical anesthesia.
acute cardiac insuffiency. Drugs 39:308, 1990. 129. Schmidt H, Secchi A, Wellmann R, et al: Dopex- Anesthesiology 74:581, 1991.
108. Smith GW, Hall JC, Farmer JB, et al: The cardio- amine maintains intestinal villus blood flow 151. Ghignone M, Quintin L, Duke P, et al: Effects of
vascular actions of dopexamine hydrochloride, an during endotoxemia in rats. Crit Care Med clonidine on narcotic requirements and hemody-
agonist at dopamine receptors and 2 adrenocep- 24:1233, 1996. namic response during induction of fentanyl
tors in the dog. J Pharm Pharmacol 39:636, 1987. 130. Maynard N, Bihari D, Dalton RN, et al: Increasing anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Anesthe-
109. Mitchell PD, Smith GW, Wells E, et al: Inhibition splanchnic blood flow in the critically ill. Chest siology 64:36, 1986.
of uptake 1 by dopexamine hydrochloride in vitro. 108:1648, 1995. 152. Aantaa RE, Kanto JH, Scheinin M: Dexmedetomi-
Br J Pharmacol 92:265, 1987. 131. Jackson NC, Taylor SH, Frais MA: Hemodynamic dine premedication for minor gynecologic
110. Lokhandwala MF: Renal actions of dopexamine comparison of dopexamine hydrochloride and surgery. Anesth Analg 70:407, 1990.
hydrochloride. Clin Intensive Care 1:163, 1990. dopamine in ischemic left ventricular dysfunc- 153. Richard MJ, Skues MA, Jarvis AP, PrysRoberts
111. Vyas SJ, Lokhandwala MF: Role of tubular dopa- tion. Am J Cardiol 62:73, 1988. C: Total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol and alfenta-
mine-1 receptors in the natriuretic and diuretic 132. Tan LB, Littler WA, Murray RG: Comparison of nil: Dose requirements for propranolol and the
response to dopexamine. Pharmacologist 31:378, the haemodynamic effects of dopexamine and effect of premedication with clonidine. Br J
1989. dobutamine in patients with severe congestive Anaesth 65:157, 1990.
112. Bass AS: Contrasting effects of dopexamine
heart failure. Int J Cardiol 30:203, 1991. 154. Murga G, Samso E, Valles J, et al: The effect of
hydrochloride on electrolyte excretion in canine 133. Young JB, Leon CA: Fenoldopam. In Messerli FH clonidine on intra-operative requirements of fen-
kidneys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 253:798, 1990. (ed): Cardiovascular Drug Therapy. Philadelphia, tanyl during combined epidural/general anesthe-
113. Chintala MS, Lokhandwala MF, Jandhyala BS:
WB Saunders, 1990. sia. Anaesthesia 49:999, 1994.
Protective effects of dopexamine hydrochloride in 134. Lokhandwala MF: Pre-clinical and clinical studies 155. Klimscha W, Chiari A, Drafft P, et al: Hemody-
renal failure after acute hemorrhage in anesthe- on the cardiovascular and renal effects of fenoldo- namic and analgesic effects of clonidine added A
II 326

repetitively to continuous epidural and spinal morphine regimen. Anesth Analg 75:607, 1992. tolerance by clonidine. Selective stimulation of
blocks. Anesth Analg 80:322, 1995. 176. Vercauteren M, Lauwers E, Meert T, et al: Com metabolic -adrenergic pathways. Diabetes
156. Racle JP, Benkhadra A, Poy JY, Bleizal B: Prolon- parison of epidural sufentanil plus clonidine 27:554, 1978.
gation of isobaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia with sufentanil alone for postoperative pain relief. 199. Gentili M, Mamelle JC, Le Foll G: Combination
with epinephrine and clonidine for hip surgery in Anaesthesia 45:531, 1990. of low-dose bupivacaine and clonidine for unilat-
the elderly. Anesth Analg 66:442, 1987. 177. Rockemann MG, Seeling W, Brinkmann A, et al: eral spinal anesthesia in arthroscopic knee
157. Niemi L: Effects of intrathecal clonidine on dura- Analgesic and hemodynamic effects of epidural surgery. Reg Anesth 20:169, 1995.
tion of bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia, haemody- clonidine, clonidine/morphine and morphine 200. Kapral S, Kocek S, Krafft P, et al: Intrathecal clo-
namics, and postoperative analgesia in patients after pancreatic surgery: A double-blind study. nidine delays motor onset of bupivacaine
undergoing knee arthroscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Anesth Analg 80:869, 1995. [abstract]. Anesthesiology 81:A935, 1994.
Scand 38:724, 1994. 178. OMeara ME, Gin T: Comparison of 0.125% bupi- 201. Venn R, Hell J, Grounds R: Respiratory effects of
158.
Singelyn FJ, Dangoisse M, Bartholomee S, vacaine with 0.125% bupivacaine and clonidine as dexmedetomidine in the surgical patient requir-
Gouverneur JM: Adding clonidine to mepiv- extradural analgesia in the first stage of labour. Br ing intensive care. Crit Care 4:302, 2000.
acaine prolongs the duration of anesthesia and J Anaesth 71:651, 1993. 202. Bekker A, Sturaitis M: Dexmedetomidine for neu-
analgesia after axillary brachial plexus block. Reg 179. Brichant JF, Bonhomme V, Mikulski M, et al:
rological surgery. Neurosurgery 57(Suppl):1, 2005.
Anesth 17:148, 1992. Admixture of clonidine to epidural bupivacaine 203. Wahlander S, Frumento R, Wagener G, et al: A
159. Wijeysundera D, Naik J, Beattie W: Alpha-2 adr- for analgesia during labor: Effect of varying cloni- prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-
energic agonists to prevent perioperative cardio- dine doses [abstract]. Anesthesiology 81:A1136, controlled study of dexmedetomidine as an
vascular complicationsa meta-analysis. Am J 1994. adjunct to epidural analgesia after thoracic
Med 114:742, 2003. 180. Cigarini I, Kaba A, Bonnet F, et al: Epidural clo- surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 19:630, 2005.
160. Ebert TJ, Hall JE, Barney JA, et al: The effects of nidine combined with bupivacaine for analgesia 204. Opie L, PodeWilson P: Beta-blocking agents. In
increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedeto- in labor: Effects on mother and neonate. Reg Opie LH, Gersh B (eds): Drugs for the Heart, 6th
midine in humans. Anesthesiology 93:382, 2000. Anesth 20:113, 1995. ed. Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders, 2005.
161. Arain SR, Ebert TJ: The efficacy, side effects, and 181. Eisenach JC, DePen S, Dubois M, et al: Epidural 205. Unverferth DV, Blanford M, Kates RE, et al: Toler-
recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine Clonidine Study Group: Epidural clonidine anes- ance to dobutamine after a 72 hour continuous
versus propofol when used for intraoperative thesia for intractable cancer pain. Pain 61:391, infusion. Am J Med 69:262, 1980.
sedation. Anesth Analg 95:461, 2002. 1995. 206. Leier CV, Huss P, Lewis RP, Unverferth DV: Drug-
162. Bekker A, Kaufman B, Samir H, Doyle W: The use 182. Petros AJ, Wright RMB: Epidural and oral cloni- induced conditioning in congestive heart failure.
of dexmedetomidine infusion for awake craniot- dine in domiciliary control of deafferentation Circulation 65:1382, 1982.
omy. Anesth Analg 92:1251, 2001. pain. Lancet 1:1034, 1987. 207. Krell MJ, Kline EM, Bates ER, et al: Intermittent,
163. Talke P, Chen R, Thomas B, et al: The hemody- 183. Eisenach JC, Rauck RL, Buzzanell C, Lysak S: Epi- ambulatory dobutamine infusions in patients
namic and adrenergic effects of perioperative dural clonidine analgesia for intractable cancer with severe congestive heart failure. Am Heart J
dexmedetomidine infusion after vascular surgery. pain: Phase I. Anesthesiology 71:647, 1989. 112:787, 1986.
Anesth Analg 90:834, 2000. 184. Ferit PA, Aydinli I, Akra S: Management of cancer 208. Spitzer W, Suissa S, Ernst P, et al: The use of -
164. Peden CJ, Cloote AH, Stratford N, et al: The effect pain with epidural clonidine [abstract]. Reg agonists and the risk of death and near death from
of intravenous dexmedetomidine premedication Anesth 17(Suppl 3S):173, 1992. asthma. N Engl J Med 326:501, 1992.
on the dose requirement of propofol to induce 185. Lund C, Hansen O, Kehlet H: Effect of epidural 209. Robin E, McCauley R: Sudden cardiac death in
loss of consciousness in patients receiving alfenta- clonidine on somatosensory evoked potentials to bronchial asthma, and inhaled with -adrenergic
nil. Anaesthesia 56:408, 2001. dermatomal stimulation. Eur J Anaesth 6:207, agonists. Chest 101:1699, 1992.
165. Triltsch AE, Welte M, von Homeyer P, et al:
1989. 210. Ziment I: Infrequent cardiac deaths occur in

Bispectral index-guided sedation with dexme- 186. Rauck RL, Eisenach JC, Jackson K, et al: Epidural bronchial asthma. Chest 101:1703, 1992.
detomidine in intensive care: A prospective, ran- clonidine treatment for refractory reflex sympa- 211. Yaju Y, Nakayama T: Effectiveness and safety of
domized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase thetic dystrophy. Anesthesiology 79:1163, 1993. ritodrine hydrochloride for the treatment of
II study. Crit Care Med 30:1007, 2002. 187. Zeigler D, Lynch SA, Muir J: Transdermal cloni- preterm labour: A systematic review. Pharma-
166. DeKock M, Pichon G, Scholtes JL: Intraoperative dine versus placebo in painful diabetic neuropa- coepidemiol Drug Saf 15:813, 2006.
clonidine enhances postoperative morphine patient- thy. Pain 48:403, 1992. 212. Westfall T, Westfall D: Adrenergic agonists and
controlled analgesia. Can J Anaesth 39:537, 188. Slogoff S: Perioperative ischemia. Semin Anesth antagonists. In Brunton L, Lazo J, Parker K (eds):
1992. 9:107, 1990. Goodman and Gilmans The Pharmacological
167. Motsh J, Graber E, Ludwig K: Addition of cloni- 189. Quintin L, Viale JP, Annat G: Oxygen uptake after Basis of Therapeutics, 11th ed. New York,
dine enhances postoperative analgesia from epi- major abdominal surgery: Effect of clonidine. McGrawHill, 2006, p 268.
dural morphine: A double blind study. Anesthesiology 74:236, 1991. 213. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, et al:
Anesthesiology 73:1066, 1990. 190. Bailey PL, Sperry RJ, Johnson GK, et al: Respira- Making health care safer: A critical analysis of
168. Bernard JM, Hommeril JL, Passuti N, Pinaud M: tory effects of clonidine alone and combined with patient safety practices. Evidence report/technol-
Postoperative analgesia by intravenous clonidine. morphine in humans. Anesthesiology 74:43, ogy assessment No. 43 (Prepared by the Univer-
Anesthesiology 75:577, 1991. 1991. sity of California at San FranciscoStanford
169. Carabine UA, Milligan KR, Moore J: Extradural 191. Ooi R, Pattison J, Feldman SA: The effects of University EvidenceBased Practice Center under
clonidine and bupivacaine for postoperative anal- intravenous clonidine on ventilation. Anaesthesia Contract No. 290-97-0013), AHRQ Publication
gesia. Br J Anaesth 68:132, 1992. 46:632, 1991. No. 01-E058. Rockville, MD, Agency for Health-
170. Carabine UA, Milligan KR, Mulholland D, Moore 192. Bergese S, Khabiri B, Roberts W, et al: Dexme- care Research and Quality, July 2001.
J: Extradural clonidine infusions for analgesia detomidine for conscious sedation in difficult 214. Stone JG, Foex P, Sear JW, et al: Myocardial

after total hip replacement. Br J Anaesth 68:338, awake fiberoptic intubation cases. J Clin Anesth ischemia in untreated hypertensive patients:
1992. 19:141, 2007. Effect of a single small oral dose of a beta-adren-
171. Rostaing S, Bonnet F, Levron JC: Effect of epidural 193. Avitsian R, Lin J, Lotto M, Ebrahim Z: Dexme- ergic blocking agent. Anesthesiology 68:495,
clonidine on analgesia and pharmacokinetics of detomidine and awake fiberoptic intubation for 1988.
epidural fentanyl in postoperative patients. Anes- possible cervical spine myelopathy: A case series. 215. Mangano DT, Layug EL, Wallace A, et al: Effect of
thesiology 75:420, 1991. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 17:97, 2005. atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbid-
172. Bonnet F, Boico O, Rostaining S: Clonidine-
194. Ramsay M, Saha D, Hebeler R: Tracheal resection ity after noncardiac surgery. Multicenter Study of
induced analgesia in postoperative patients: Epi- in the morbidly obese patient: The role of dexmed Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. N Engl J
dural versus intramuscular administration. etomidine. J Clin Anesth 18:452, 2006. Med 335:1713, 1996.
Anesthesiology 72:423, 1990. 195. Uhde TW, Stein MB, Vittone BJ, et al: Behavioral 216. Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, et al: The effect of
173. Tryba M, Zenz M, Strumpf M: Clonidine i.v. is and physiologic effects of short-term and long- bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocar-
equally effective as morphine i.v. for postoperative term administration of clonidine in panic disor- dial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vas-
analgesiaa double blind study [abstract]. Anes- der. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:170, 1989. cular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac
thesiology 75:A1085, 1991. 196. Gold MS, Pottash AC, Sweeney DR, Klever HD: Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography
174. DeKock M, Crochet B, Morimont C, Scholtes JL: Opiate withdrawal using clonidine. A safe, effec- Study Group. N Engl J Med 341:1789, 1999.
Intravenous or epidural clonidine for intra- and tive, and rapid nonopiate treatment. JAMA 217. Raby KE, Brull SJ, Timimi F, et al: The effect of
postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 79:525, 243:343, 1980. heart rate control on myocardial ischemia among
1993. 197. Hughes JR: Clonidine, depression, and smoking high-risk patients after vascular surgery. Anesth
175. Mogensen T, Eliasen K, Ejlersen E, et al: Epidural cessation. JAMA 259:2901, 1988. Analg 88:477, 1999.
clonidine enhances postoperative analgesia from 198. Metz SA, Halter JB, Robertson RP: Induction of 218. Urban MK, Markowitz SM, Gordon MA, et al:
A a combined low-dose epidural bupivacaine and defective insulin secretion and impaired glucose Postoperative prophylactic administration of beta-
() 327 12
adrenergic blockers in patients at risk for myocar- blind trial of metoprolol in acute myocardial 258. Wayne VS, Harper RW, Laufer E, et al: Adverse
dial ischemia. Anesth Analg 90:1257, 2000. infarction. Effects on ventricular tachyarrhyth- interaction between -adrenergic blocking drugs
219. Stevenson LW: Beta-blockers for stable heart
mias. N Engl J Med 308:614, 1983. and verapamil: Report of three cases. Aust N Z J
failure. N Engl J Med 346:1346, 2002. 238. Bristow MR, Gilbert EM, Abraham WT, et al: Med 12:285, 1982.
220. Salpeter SS, Ormiston T, Salpeter E, et al: Cardi- Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements 259. Pendleton RG, Newman DJ, Sherman SS, et al:
oselective beta-blockers for chronic obstructive in left ventricular function and survival in sub- Effect of propranolol upon the hemoglobin-oxy-
pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev jects with chronic heart failure. MOCHA Investi- gen dissociation curve. J Pharmacol Exp Ther
2:CD003566, 2002. gators. Circulation 94:2807, 1996. 180:647, 1972.

II
221. MERITHF Study Group: Effect of metoprolol 239. Packer M, Colucci WS, SacknerBernstein JD, et 260. Bernstein JS, Ebert TJ, Stowe DF, et al: Partial
CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/ al: Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the attenuation of hemodynamic responses to rapid
XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive effects of carvedilol in patients with moderate to sequence induction and intubation with labetalol.
Heart Failure (MERITHF). Lancet 353:2001, severe heart failure. The PRECISE Trial. Prospec- J Clin Anesth 1:444, 1989.
1999. tive Randomized Evaluation of Carvedilol on 261. Huey J, Thomas JP, Hendricks DR, et al: Clinical
222. CIBISII Investigators and Committees: The
Symptoms and Exercise. Circulation 94:2793, evaluation of labetalol for the treatment of hyper-
Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS 1996. tensive urgency. Am J Hypertens 1:284S, 1988.
II): A randomised trial. Lancet 353:9, 1999. 240. Eichhorn EJ, Bristow MR: Medical therapy can 262. Gabrielson G, Lingham R, Dimich I, et al: Com-
223. Furberg C: Secondary prevention trials after myo- improve the biological properties of the chroni- parative study of labetalol and hydralazine in the
cardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 60:28A, 1987. cally failing heart. A new era in the treatment of treatment of postoperative hypertension
224. Rango R, Langlois S: Comparison of withdrawal heart failure. Circulation 94:2285, 1996. [abstract]. Anesth Analg 66:S63, 1987.
phenomena after propranolol, metroprolol, and 241. Communal C, Singh K, Sawyer D, et al: Opposing 263. Skrobic J, Cruise C, Webster R, et al: Labetalol vs
pindolol. Am Heart J 104:437, 1982. effects of 1- and 2-adrenergic receptors on nitroprusside in hypertension post coronary-
225. Henry J, Cassidy S: Membrane stabilizing activity: cardiac myocyte apoptosis: Role of a pertussis toxin bypass surgery. Am J Hypertens 2:1295, 1989.
A major cause of fatal poisoning. Lancet 1:1414, sensitive G protein. Circulation 100:2210, 1999. 264. Lavies NG, Meiklejohn BH, May AE, et al: Hyper-
1986. 242. Lowes B, Gilbert E, Abraham W, et al.: Myocardial tensive and catecholamine response to tracheal
226. London MJ: Con: Beta-blockers are indicated for gene expression in dilated cardiomyopathy intubation in patients with pregnancy-induced
all adults at increased risk undergoing noncardiac treated with beta-blocking agents. N Engl J Med hypertension. Br J Anaesth 63:429, 1989.
surgery, Anesth Analg 104:11, 2007. 346:1357, 2002. 265. Jouppilla P, Kirkinen P, Koivula A: Labetalol does
227. Fleisher L, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. for the 243. Eichhorn EJ, Bristow MR: Practical guidelines for not alter the placental and fetal blood flow or
ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines: initiation of beta-adrenergic blockade in patients maternal prostanoids in pre-eclampsia. Br J
ACC/AHA 2006 guideline update on periopera- with chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 79:794, Obstet Gynaecol 93:543, 1986.
tive cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac 1997. 266. Dupont AG, Van der Niepen P, Taeymans Y, et al:
surgery: Focused update on perioperative beta- 244. Bristow MR: -Adrenergic receptor blockade in Effect of carvedilol on ambulatory blood pressure,
blocker therapya report of the American chronic heart failure. Circulation 101:558, 2000. renal hemodynamics, and cardiac function in
College of Cardiology/American Heart Associa- 245. Frishman W: Pindolol: A new -adrenoceptor
essential hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
tion Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing antagonist with partial agonist activity. N Engl J 10(Suppl 1):S130, 1987.
Committee to Update the 2002 Guidelines on Med 308:940, 1983. 267. Eggertsen R, Sivertsson R, Adren L, et al: Haemo-
Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Non- 246. Van den Meiracker AH, Man int Veld AJ, Ritsema dynamic effects of carvedilol, a new -adrenoceptor
cardiac Surgery). Anesth Analg 104:15, 2007. van Eck HJ, et al: Hemodynamic and hormonal blocker and precapillary vasodilator in essential
228. The POBBLE study (POBBLE Trial Investigators): adaptations to -adrenoceptor blockade. A hypertension. J Hypertens 2:529, 1984.
Perioperative -blockade (POBBLE) for patients 24-hour study of acebutolol, atenolol, pindolol, 268. Leonetti G, Sempieri L, Cuspidi C, et al: Resting
undergoing infrarenal vascular surgery: Results of and propranolol in hypertensive patients. Circula- and postexercise hemodynamic effects of carve-
a randomized double-blind controlled trial. J Vasc tion 78:957, 1988. dilol, a -adrenergic blocker and precapillary
Surg 41:602, 2005. 247. Man int Veld AJ, Van den Meiracker AH,
vasodilator in hypertensive patients. J Cardiovasc
229. Juul AB, Wetterslev J, Gluud C, et al. for the Schalekamp MA: Do beta-blockers really increase Pharmacol 10(Suppl 1)1:S94, 1987.
DIPOM Trial Group. Effect of perioperative peripheral vascular resistance? Review of the lit- 269. Omvik P, LundJohansen P: Acute haemody-

blockade in patients with diabetes undergoing erature and new observations under basal condi- namic effects of carvedilol in essential hyperten-
major non-cardiac surgry: Randomized placebo tions. Am J Hypertens 1:91, 1988. sion at rest and during exercise. Eur Heart J
controlled blinded multicentre trial. BMJ 248. Shand D: Propanolol. N Engl J Med 293:280,
12:736, 1991.
332:1482, 2006. 1975. 270. Cervantes Escarcega JL, Ruiz de Chavez A,

230. Lindenauer PK, Pekow P, Wang K, et al: Periop- 249. Platia E, Fitzpatrick P, Wallis D, et al: Esmolol vs Guadalajara Boo J: Double-blind study of the effi-
erative beta-blocker therapy and mortality after verapamil for the treatment of recent-onset atrial cacy and tolerability of carvedilol vs nifedipine
major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 353:349, afibrillation/flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 11:170A, S.R. in uncomplicated essential hypertension [in
2005. 1988. spanish]. Invest Med Int 19:142, 1992.
231. DeBruijn N, Reves JG, Croughnell N, Knopes K: 250. Waldo AL, Camm AJ, deRuyter H, et al: Effect of 271. Ostergren J, Storstein L, Karlberg BE, et al: Quality
Comparison of hemodynamic responses to iso- d-sotalol on mortality in patients with left ven- of life in hypertensive patients treated with either
proterenol infusion and surgical stress in patients tricular dysfunction after recent and remote myo- carvedilol or enalapril. Blood Press 5:41, 1996.
given cardioselective and noncardioselective cardial infarction. Lancet 348:7, 1996. 272. Ruilope LM, Group CS: Comparison of a new
-adrenergic antagonists. Anesth Analg 66:637, 251. Doggrell SA, Brown L: d-Sotalol: Death by the vasodilating beta blocker, carvedilol, with atenolol
1987. SWORD or deserving of further consideration for in the treatment of mild to moderate essential
232. Olsson G, Rehnqvist N, Sjogren A, et al: Long- clinical use? Expert Opin Investig Drugs 9:1625, hypertension. Am J Hypertens 7:129, 1994.
term treatment with metoprolol after myocardial 2000. 273. Weber K, Bohmeke T, van der Does R, et al: Com-
infarction: Effect on 3 year mortality and morbid- 252. DeSanctis RW, Doroghazi RM, Austen WG,
parison of the hemodynamic effects of metoprolol
ity. J Am Coll Cardiol 5:1428, 1985. Buckley MJ: Aortic dissection. N Engl J Med and carvedilol in hypertensive patients. Cardio-
233. Yusuf S: Interventions that potentially limit myo- 317:1060, 1987. vasc Drug Ther 10:113, 1996.
cardial infarct size: Overview of clinical trials. Am 253. Grubb BP, Sirio C, Zelis R: Intravenous labetalol 274. Albergati F, Paterno E, Venuti RP, et al: Compari-
J Cardiol 60:11A, 1987. in acute aortic dissection. JAMA 258:78, 1987. son of the effects of carvedilol and nifedipine in
234. ISIS-1 (First International Study of Infarct Sur- 254. Wiersinga WM, Touber JL: The influence of
patients with essential hypertension and non-
vival) Collaborative Group: Randomised trial of -adrenergic blocking agents on plasma thyroxine insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Cardiovasc
intravenous atenolol among 16,027 cases of sus- and triiodothyronine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab Pharmacol 19(Suppl 1):S86, 1992.
pected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. Lancet 45:293, 1977. 275. Louis WJ, Krum H, Conway EL: A risk-benefit
1:57, 1986. 255. Psaty B, Koepsell T, Wagner E, et al: The relative assessment of carvedilol in the treatment of car-
235. Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, et al: Beta blockade risk of incident coronary heart disease associated diovascular disorders. Drug Saf 11:86, 1994.
during and after myocardial infarction: An over- with recently stopping the use of -blockers. 276. van der Does R, Eberhardt R, Derr I, et al: Efficacy
view of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc JAMA 263:1653, 1990. and safety of carvedilol in comparison with
Dis 27:335, 1985. 256. Cleophas T, Kauw F: Pressor responses from non- nifedipine sustained-release in chronic stable
236. The TIMI Study Group: Comparison of invasive cardioselective beta-blockers. Angiology 39:587, angina. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 19(Suppl 1):S122,
and conservative strategies after treatment with 1988. 1992.
intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute 257. Strauss W, Parisi A: Combined use of calcium- 277. Basu S, Senior R, van der Does R, et al: Carvedilol
myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 320:618, channel and -adrenergic blockers for the treat- reduces adverse cardiac events following acute
1989. ment of chronic stable angina. Ann Intern Med myocardial infarction [abstract]. Circulation
237. Ryden L, Ariniego R, Arnman K, et al: A double- 109:570, 1988. 92(Suppl 1):1, 1995.
A
II 328

278. Senior R, Basu S, Lahiri A: Carvedilol prevents 294. Raia JJ Jr, Barone JA, Byerly WG, Lacy CR:
mortality after non-cardiac surgery. Anesthesiol-
remodeling and improves prognosis in patients Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: A ogy 101:284, 2004.
with left ventricular dysfunction following acute comparative review. DICP 24:506, 1990. 314. Burgos LG, Ebert TJ, Asiddao C, et al: Increased
myocardial infarction [abstract]. J Am Coll 295. Weber MA: Safety issues during antihypertensive intraoperative cardiovascular morbidity in dia-
Cardiol 27(Suppl A):319A, 1996. treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme betics with autonomic neuropathy. Anesthesiol-
279. Zehender M, Faber T, Schnabel P, et al: Benefits inhibitors. Am J Med 84(Suppl 4A):16, 1988. ogy 70:591, 1989.
and hazards of carvedilol in unstable angina: A 296. Warner JN, Rush JE: Safety profiles of the
315. Page MM, WatKins PJ: Cardiorespiratory arrest
double-blind placebo controlled, randomized angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Drugs and diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Lancet 1:14,
study [abstract]. Circulation 92(Suppl 1):I, 1995. 35(Suppl 5):89, 1988. 1978.
280. Cohn JN, Fowler MB, Bristow MA, et al: Effect of 297. Ferner RE: Adverse effects of angiotensin-
316. Ewing DJ, Clarke BF: Diagnosis and management
carvedilol in severe chronic heart failure [abstract]. converting-enzyme inhibitors. Adverse Drug of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. BMJ 285:916,
J Am Coll Cardiol 27(Suppl A):169A, 1996. React Acute Poisoning Rev 141:528, 1990. 1982.
281. Colucci WS, Packer M, Bristow MR, et al: Carve- 298. Jong P, Demers C, McKelvie RS, et al: Angiotensin 317. Sato I, Hasegawa Y, Takahashi N, et al: Age-related
dilol inhibits clinical progression in patients with receptor blockers in heart failure: Meta-analysis of changes of cardiac control function in man. With
mild symptoms of heart failure. Circulation randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol special reference to heart rate control at rest and
94:2800, 1996. 39:463, 2002. during exercise. J Gerontol 36:564, 1981.
282. Bristow MR, Gilbert EM, Abraham WT, et al: 299. Ziskind A: Transdermal scopolamine-induced
318. Esler MD, Turner AG, Kaye DM, et al: Aging
Effects of carvedilol on LV function and mortality psychosis. Postgrad Med 84:73, 1988. effects on human sympathetic neuronal function.
in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with 300. Wilkinson JA: Side-effects of transdermal sco Am J Physiol 268:R278, 1995.
ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy polamine. J Emerg Med 5:389, 1987. 319. Mancia G, Ferrari A, Gregorini L, et al: Blood
[abstract]. Circulation 94(Suppl 1):I, 3879, 1996. 301. Gross NJ: Ipratroprium bromide. N Eng J Med pressure and heart rate variabilities in normoten-
283. Gray R, Bateman T, Czer L, et al: Comparison of 319:486, 1988. sive and hypertensive human beings. Circ Res
esmolol and nitroprusside for acute post-cardiac 302. Alcalay M, Izraeli S, WallachKapon R, et al:
53:96, 1983.
surgical hypertension. Am J Cardiol 59:887, Paradoxical pharmacodynamic effect of atropine 320. Ng AV, Callister R, Johnson DG, et al: Sympa-
1987. on parasympathetic control: A study by spectral thetic neural reactivity to stress does not increase
284. Reves JG, Croughwell ND, Hawkins E, et al:
analysis of heart rate fluctuations. Clin Pharmacol with age in healthy humans. Am J Physiol
Esmolol for treatment of intraoperative tachycar- Ther 52:518, 1992. 267:H344, 1994.
dia and/or hypertension in patients having 303. Ghoneim MM, Dembo JB, Block RI: Time course 321. White M, Roden R, Minobe W, et al: Age-related
cardiac operations, bolus loading technique. J of antagonism of sedative and amnesic effects changes in -adrenergic neuroeffector systems in
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 100:221, 1990. of diazepam by flumazenil. Anesthesiology the human heart. Circulation 90:1225, 1994.
285. Oxorn D, Knox JW, Hill J: Bolus doses of esmolol 70:899, 1989. 322. Vaz M, Rajkumar C, Wong J, et al: Oxygen con-
for the prevention of perioperative hypertension 304. Charlson ME, MacKenzie CR, Gold JP: Preopera- sumption in the heart, hepatomesenteric bed, and
and tachycardia. Can J Anaesth 37:206, 1990. tive autonomic function abnormalities in patients brain in young and elderly human subjects, and
286. Wallis DE, Littman WJ, Scanlon PJ: Safety and with diabetes mellitus and patients with hyperten- accompanying sympathetic nervous activity.
efficacy of esmolol for unstable angina pectoris. sion. J Am Coll Surg 179:1, 1994. Metabolism 45:1487, 1996.
Am J Cardiol 62:1033, 1988. 305. Ewing DJ, Martyn CN, Young RJ: The value of 323. Buchholz J, Duckles SP: Effect of age on prejunc-
287. Kirshenbaum JM, Kloner RJ, McGowan N,
cardiovascular autonomic function tests: 10 years tional modulation of norepinephrine release. J
Antman EM: Use of an ultrashort-acting experience in diabetes. Diabetes Care 8:491, 1985. Pharmacol Exp Ther 252:159, 1990.
-receptor blocker (esmolol) in patients with 306. Esler M, Thompson J, Kaye D, et al: Effects of 324. Hyland L, Docherty JR: Further examination of
acute myocardial ischemia and relative contrain- aging on the responsiveness of the human cardiac the effects of ageing on the adrenoceptor respon-
dications to beta-blockade therapy. J Am Coll sympathetic nerves to stressors. Circulation siveness of the rat vas deferens. Eur J Pharmacol
Cardiol 12:773, 1988. 91:351, 1995. 110:241, 1985.
288. The Parkinson Study Group: Effect of deprenyl on 307. Adams K: Current perspectives on -receptor
325. Fernandes F, Salaices CF, SanchezFerrer JL,

the progression of disability in early Parkinsons antagonists in the treatment of symptomatic ven- et al: Effect of aging and hypertension on [ 3H]
disease. N Engl J Med 321:1364, 1989. tricular dysfunction. Pharmacotherapy 16:69S, noradrenaline release in rat mesenteric artery. J
289. Roizen MF: Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: Are 1996. Hypertens 10(Suppl 4):S65, 1992.
we condemned to relive history, or is history no 308. Eichhorn EJ: Do -blockers have a role in patients 326. Mathias CJ, Christensen NJ, Frankel HL, et al:
longer relevant [letter]? J Clin Anesth 2:293, 1990. with congestive heart failure? Cardiol Clin 12:133, Cardiovascular control in recently injured tetra-
290. Doyle DJ: Ketamine induction and monoamine 1994. plegics in spinal shock. Q J Med 48:273, 1979.
oxidase inhibitors. J Clin Anesth 2:324, 1990. 309. Rundqvist B, Eisenhofer G, Elam M, Friberg P: 327. Van Lieshout JJ, Imholz BPM, Wesseling KH, et
291. Materson BJ: Adverse effects of angiotensin-
Attenuated cardiac sympathetic responsiveness al: Singing-induced hypotension: A complication
converting enzyme inhibitors in antihypertensive during dynamic exercise in patients with heart of high spinal cord lesion. Neth J Med 38:75, 1991.
therapy with focus on quinapril. Am J Cardiol failure. Circulation 95:940, 1997. 328. Stjernberg L, Blumberg H, Wallin B: Sympathetic
69:46C, 1992. 310. Anand K, Hickey P: Halothane-morphine com- activity in man after spinal cord injury: Outflow
292. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Sur- pared with high dose sufentanil for anesthesia and to muscle below the lesion. Brain 109:695, 1986.
vival) Collaborative Group: A randomised facto- postoperative analgesia in neonatal cardiac 329. Kirstein S, Insel P: Autonomic nervous system
rial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral surgery. N Engl J Med 326:1, 1992. pharmacogenomics: A progress report. Pharma-
mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sul- 311. Kehlet H: Manipulation of the metabolic response col Rev 56:31, 2004.
phate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute in clinical practice. World J Surg 24:690, 2000. 330. Zhu H, Poole J, Lu Y, Harshfield G, et al: Sympa-
myocardial infarction. Lancet 345:669, 1995. 312. Bardram L, FunchJensen P, Jensen P, et al:
thetic nervous system, genes and human essential
293. Nash DT: Comparative properties of angiotensin- Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with hypertension. Curr Neurovasc Res 2:303, 2005.
converting enzyme inhibitors: Relations with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and 331. Jacob G, Garland E, Costa F, et al: 2-Adrenoceptor
inhibition of tissue angiotensin-converting mobilisation. Lancet 345:763, 1995. genotype and function affect hemodynamic
enzyme and potential clinical implications. Am J 313. Wallace A, Galindez D, Salahieh A, et al: Effect profile heterogeneity in postural tachycardia syn-
Cardiol 69:26C, 1992. of clonidine on cardiovascular morbidity and drome. Hypertension 47:421, 2006.

A
Piyush M. Patel John C. Drummond
..
.. ..



13


1. ,
. () .
15% .
50 100 . ,
.
80% 20%, . 7.
2. 60% ().
, .
. burst suppression .
3. . 60%.
.

. , (MA)
. 1
. ,
().
4.
() 8. , , .
65 150 . . ( 60% ,
). , burst suppression .
, ,
. .
,
5.
.
,
. 9.
2 ,
25-70. . .
60 . . 10 /100 /.
.
,
. .
6. , 10. (, ,
, , , ),

.
.
, , .
.
. ,
.
, .

329
II 330

- . 13-2 , *
,

, -
, . //
, .
. -
.
, - /
-
. . 63 co2
. . 46 - o2
, -

, ,

-
.


/ ,


-
, , , -
(, ).
, ,
, ,
. -

-

.
. -
-
; ;
,
. *.

1350 , 2% .
12-15% . -
. ,
3,5 100 .
50 / , -
20% .
. . -
, 4 , . -
. 13-1.
60% . -
. , ,
, , , . -
. - : , -
;
. 13-1 ;

().
-
45-55 /100 /
( ) 75-80 /100 / . (-
( ) 20 /100 / )
O2 3-3,5 /100 / ( ).

1,5-2,1 . ./100 /
, ,
/
. 13-2.
32-44 . .
Pv2

55-70%
SvO2
, , 2 2,
( ) 8 . .

A ;
.
331 13
. -,
-
, .
,
, , , ,
-

,
.

II
, -
, -

. , -
, -
(. 13-1).

. 13-1
-
.
, -
- , -
, . ,
. , , -
, -
. .
. K+, H+, , . -
(). (
) -
, . , -
NO. NO
. -
-

.
- 56 /
,
. -
, , - 19 /
,
. , P1
, 1,25
, -
(), P, ,
N1
, .
, -
0 8 16 24 32 40
.
()
,

-
, , ,
1,8%/60% N2O
.
, -
: 0,6%/60% N2O
, -
, . P1
.
,
, -
, - N1
.
0 8 16 24 32 40
( -
) . ()
. 13-2
, , -
.
.
() -
. , , ,
- 2. , ,
- , -
. . -
.


A
II 332

. 100
PaCO2
PaO2
(1,5 ),
- ( ) (. 13-2).
75
,
-,

(/100 /)
, .
- 50
,
.
.
3. 6-7% 25
.
, 18-20C
. , - 0
, 0 50 100 150 200
( - PaO2, PaCO2, ( . .)
) (. 13-3). ,
.
. 13-4 , () 2,
, -
2 ()
( -
) .
18C - 2.
10% 2 1 . .
. , 1-2 /100 /.
2 2
. 25 . . -
2 -
. (4CBF/42). ,
37 42C ,
. , - 2.
42C, 2 ,
, () ( -
, , - ). , ,
(). -
Pa2. . , -
2
(. 13-4). - .
2
37C
6 . NO, NO
60% : 3,3 /100 / , , -
40% : 2,2 /100 / 2- . ,
5
, -,
Q37-27C=2,4

.
CMRO2 (/100 /)

4 2 -
. -
3
27C
25% : 1,4 . , -
16% : 0,9 , (-
2 ), ,
27C ()
1 0% : 0 + .
8% : 2 , .
0,4 () -
0

40 35 30 25 20 15
. -
(C) , 6-8 .

. 13-3 . -
. , , -
. 13-1: ()
,
().
. -
, .
37 . (-
27C ( Q10) . ( Michenfelder ) . -
A JD: Anesthesia and the Brain: Clinical, Functional, Metabolic, and Vascular Correlates.
New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1988.)
2
333 13
, -
. - . , -
,
(). , -
() .
- ,
. -

II
Pa2. 2 60 (, 2
300 . . . ).
2 60 . . ,
(. 13-4).
. - , . , -

, , -, -
. , - .
- - NO.
NO, (. . 31). -
- ( ).
-

. , -
- -
. -
, 5. -
, . - .
- .
. (-
. - ), (-
. ),
1 12%.
. ,

() , -
- .

, ,
- , ,
. , ,
. -
70 150 . .
(. . 13-4). , -
= 50 .
. . ( )
, ,
4. , , - (
() , ). -,
. , -
, -
70 . . (. . 13-5).
( ).
- . -
, (= ) - ,
. .
5 15 . ., ,
, 70 . ., 6.
, 55-60
. ., . , -
-
. .
-
, , - , -,
. ( ,, .
) -
3-4 . , -
-
, . - . A
II 334


,
( , -
. , ,
, - ), .
7. - , ,
33% 45%, .
-, - , , -
. - ,
.
- -
. - .
, , --
8. -
10. ,
. , ,
. -
. ,
. - . -,
, -
30% 34% (
. )
- .
9.
-
, ,
55%. , -

(1, 2, , ).
,
,
, .
, -
, , (
, ), . -
- . - ,
. - ,
.

. , -
,
-

(
) .
,
. ,
. 13-3,
-
, -
.
1-. ,

, 1-
(, ),
. , ,
, . -
, -
,
.

11. -
-. , 1- -
50 100 150 200 ,
( . .) ; -
. 13-5 - 1-.
. ,
A . -
.
. ,
335 13
. 13-3 . ,
, , * , , -
, -

, , ,
.
1 0/ 0 -. ,
-

II
2 0 . -
+ + 5 16 0,75 /17, -
,
( ) +++ +++
, . -
++ 0 ,
( ) ? ?0

. -
?0 ,
(). -, -
. -
0/ 0/+
-,
( + +
) .
+ + - . , ,
, -
( ) +++ +++ -
, ,
, , . ; , .
; + , , 0 ; .

. , -
-
,
. - -
.
, - ( , . ,
1- ) -
12, . . 18,
, ,
-
(. ). ,
, , .
1- ,
, , - ,
19.
. ,
-. - 100 -1-1. -
-
. - 20% 30%.18.
-
, 13. - -1 2-.
, 1-. -
,
, - .
, . ,
, ; ,
20% . (15%) , -
, , 20.
-14. - , -, -
, 2-. -
, , , ,
- .
. Artru . , - 2-. 2--
, -
14. .
, - - , -
, - 2- -
. King .
.15 , ,
, - . A
II 336

, 25%21. 28.
1 / - (=150 . .),
0,2 0,6 // -
30% 22. (. . 13-5). -
, , - (
),
, - . -
. , - 28. -

- ,
23. , ,
- -
. , - (,
( -
), ). -
( ,
) - -
. , .

30,31.
, -
, , .
1:125,32,
24. , . -
.
.
-
, ,

, .
, -
- . ,
. ,
, .
. ,
,
. , -
(. . 63-5).
,
. . -,
,

.
-, - . -
,
, -
25. 6
(/100)

.
5 /100 26,
2 25 70 .
. 0,049 /100 1 . 4
20%
. 2.
1400 , 2 25 55
. . 20 .
, , 2
, -
50%
.
-
, , 0
(. 13-6). , 20 40 60 80 100
. , (/100 /)
, -
27. . 13-6 ().
. - ,
, ,
A ,
. , 50%
20%
337 13
. , -
. - -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
. 13-7.
1,2 /
, -
, ,
- 3 /
.

II
0,15 /
, /
0,2 /
. . - 0,2 /

10 /
(, , , -
17 / + 50% N2O
). ,
, in 1 / + 70% N2O
vitro
45. (in vivo) - 0,2 / +
,
2 / +

46. - 10-55 /
, ,
2 - -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
.

. 13-7 , -
.
(-
. ) . -
30%47. 0,5%. .
, , . .
( 22 33-44.)
50%46,48. -

46. , - -
- 55. ,
, - ,
( ), -
, - , .
(. . 13-1). -
2, -, 56,57,
49. , -
, , 58.
. ,
72 , , - , -
-, , -
24 . - .
48 50.
-
60 . ., -
2 . . -
33,59, -
.
(2,6-)
27%60.
. - ,
.
51. Renou .33,
, 0,2 /,
, (- 34% 45%, . -
) 53-79%52,53. Alkire ,
. - -
- ()
. .
54. 48-58%, - Bingham .61 ,
. , , ,
.

- - . A
II 338

, - . ,
, - , . Vernhiet .35
, (
- ) 12-30
. ( 16) / 50% N2O. -
, , , -
, 62 63. . 5
, ,
, . (
,
64. ) ,
, .
, - 21% 26%, (<0,5). -
65, , , - . 13-7 (
. 17 /) . Murkin
.
2 33,59. . , 100 /,
. 0,4 /68. 25%, ,

(. ), . Firestone .,
: , , 1,5
/ .
- ,
. , , -
- 69.
. , , 2, -
, .
, ,
.
- , ,
, , --
, .
, - . McPherson .70 -
. (320 /) -
- . ,
, . , 2, , -
, . -
, - . Schregel
. - . 25-50 / ,
, 60%
. 71. -
. .
1 / ( ) Moyer ,
.66 , ,
41%. , . Mayberg .
-
. , - 25-50 /
, . Jobes 72.
. (1 3 /) ,
70% (.
34. )73-77. ,
, - ,
. - , -
78,79.
, .
.
. , 80,81, , -
--
. .
. - Stephan .36 10 /
- .
, . 29%
- 22%. Murkin .
60
120 . . 2 / 82. Mayer .
A 70% 67. 0,5 /
339 13
83. Weinstabl . , -
; ,
1,0 2,0 / - 95.
84. Weinstabl .84, , .
Mayer .83 - Lorenz .,
, 0,5 / - -
. ()96.

II
- Kofke .
, - -
, . 97. ,
, , , -
, ,
84-88. , , , -
73,89. ( , ,
, ) 96. ,
-
, ,
. - 298.
90. , ,
( 87) ,
. -
. , -
, , .
.
,
. , - -
78,79,91,92, - . 15 -
, 25%
- 38.
78, - ( ). Forster .
. , 30-34% 0,15
, - - / -
, 39,99. Veselis ., , -
. 12%
. , - ,
, , , ,
, - 100. 2 101.
, , - ,
. -
, - , -, -
, 1 / .
93.
0,35 -1-1 , , - (-
, , ) (). , -
-
- , , ,
, 2 94. .

. -
- -
30% .
5
/ 3 //37. 99,102.
2 /, - , -
3 -1-1, - . Knudsen
. .103 -
-
(. )36. (
, - ), Chiolero .104
, ,
. ,
- .
, , -
, . ,
,
0,05 0,15 -1-1 - , , - A
II 340

, ( -
) 44-56% 180-217%, -
. , - 117.
, , 3 / 10%, 15 /
. , , - 27%.
, - (160 /) -
. ,
- 118. -
, -
. ,
.
5 / 30
45 -1-1 Lam
- . -
. , - 24% 20%, 119.
, Bedford .120 -
105,106 3 / 1,5 / -
, - ,
, ,
. .
105, , - -
( ) .
. .
,

.
, -
107. - .
, -
. - .
, .
108. , -
, ,
(0,2-0,3 /) , -
25%109. ( >5 10 /) .
- 2 /, -
. 6,6-8,5 /
. . 1,5-2,0 / -
(S)- (R)-- .
. (S)- -
, (R)-
, --
110.
-
111. (S)-
, - ,
- ,
. .
, - , -
112. - ,
, , 121-125.
2 .
.

. -
(, , - , - ,
) , . -
113-115. , 0,5 MA,
- ,
(1,5-5 / , .
116. 1,0 MA
, , -,
, .
, - 1,0 MA
, , ,
A . .
341 13
1
, - . -
.
, - ,
- .
126-129. , 1
, , - .

II
50% 50-60%
. 52,53. ,
. - -
- , ,
/; ,
, , - (. 13-9)137,138,151. , -
123,130.
,
. . , -
. - -

- .
: >> > =
> . , , -
. - ,
, - . .
, /
. - .
, -
. -
, - .
,
, .
, . 63-71%,
, . - 51%152.
, -,
. - N--D-
- () 153,
, +-
. (TREK)154. 1
15% 35%
. ; ,
, 1 - 22%155.
, 26% -
- ()156.
131. - 2
, , 157. -
80 . ., 1,1 - -
191% ,
10% (. 13-8)131,132. - , -
1,2 MA 158.
45% 15%, , , ,
136. -
- 159.

. , , - . -
, -
. , - ,
1,1 19%, ,
.
. 45%129. .
, - .
( -
) ()
. 1 134 - , (. . 19-8). -
136 38% 22%, , .
39% 35%, . , , ,
- ,
, , , 1 124. A
II 342

2
-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 .
, -
, ,
2 47. -
.
. -


( )
1 ;
-
161. -



50


45

( 100 -1 -1)
40
-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200

2
35

. 13-8 -
. , -
132 30
1,1
-
. ,
25
123,133
N2O.
-
1,1 20
- 125. 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 1,4
1 ()
134. , A
1 135

3,5


,
, 3,0
1,0 , , -
2 ( 100 -1 -1)

( -
)
2,5
25%139, 38%134 22%160, .
, (0,9 MA) (0,5
MA)
40% 46%, 54,140. 2,0
.
( ) -

1,5
124.

1,5-2,0 .
6,0%
- 1,0
, - 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0
. ()
B
. 4,0 MA
, -
. 13-9 () () .

-
. 54,96,134,135,138-150.
. 2 (35-40 . .),
. , , .
.
A .
,

343 13
, ,
. , , -
, 2 -
. .
/. ( ,
- , ,
. - ),

II
.
, . - -
, , . .
.
128,162,163.
, ,
164.
1 (. 13-10) .
141. , -
141,163. - -
. , , . ,
(
),
-
. -
0-1 MAC/EC50
. ,
, -
. , Eintrei
. -
,
165. -
166-168 -

1-1,5 MA/EC50

.
-
. ,
-
,
1 . -
,
(. . 13-9). ,
1,5-2 MA/EC50

, ,
, -
,
. , , -
,
1:1.
, , -

. ,
0-2 MA/EC50

(, -
, )
,
166,168.
() ,
. 13-10 . A H,
- - () -
167. -
(), ().
1,5
, 169. 2,0
, , .
, -
. , , -
-
. ,
. -
. , -
. , . ( Kaisti K., Metsahonkala L., Teras M. et al. Effects of
- surgical levels of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia on cerebral blood fl ow in
-
healthy subjects studied with positron emission tomography. Anesthesiology 2002;
96: 1358-1370.)
A
II 344

,
,
58,127. , -
. Maekawa .164 .
- CO2 .
, 2
. 1 142,173,174.
54% - , -
, ,
() . . -
1,0 MA (.. -
2,0 MA) .
20% , -
, 70% (. 13-11). . ,
, , . ,
, - -, -
, -
, , , (. . 13-5).
, - -
58,127 - .
, . -
- - 1,2-1,5 , , -
(
, , )175,176, , -
177.
-
. , ,
. , - : ,
, .
, - -
.
, - (. . 63).
, ,
, .
. - ,
, , . ,
.
, - N2O -
, .
2,5-5
162,170,171. , 250

3-6
, ,
151,172. 200
.
(/100 /)


(/100 /)

,
( . .)

150
. ,
,
. -
, 100

, ,
(. . 13-6). , 50
, ,
, . , -
, - 0
25. 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0
, -

1
. 13-11 -
, ; , -
() -
, .
(. 13-12)53. , 1 , .
2, -
. , , . (SD)
A . ,
Maekawa .164

345 13
- 178.
(. 13-13). N2O
, - ,
. N2O - .
, N2O .
, , - N2O -
, - ,

II
. . Phirman Shapiro183 ,
N2O -
. 70% N2O
N2O . - -
,
181 - . -
182 , N2O -
(
. , Henriksen Jor- 27 . .)184 50%
gensen181 -
() -
66% N2O . . Jung . -
13 40 . .
, , - 0,7%
70% N2O .
, -
BO N2O185. -
180 3,5 ,

160 N2O -
3,0
, , -, -
(/100 /

140 .
2,5
(/100)

120 N2O ,
2,0 96. , -, .
100
Jobes .34 ,
80 1,5 1 / 70% N2O -
-
60
1,0 .
40
0,5
20
, , N2O
.
0 0
N2O

A
186, -
15
180.
N2 O N 2O N2O -
. ,

0 , ,
N2O 1
, 179-187-190.
Algotsson .143
-15
- N2 . -
, 1,5 MA -
0,75 MA 65% N2O.
-30 43% ,
N2O -

.
Lam, Strebel .179,190 -
- 45
, 1,0
B MA , 1 MA -
. 13-12 . ,
50% 65% N2O143,144,191.
, , ,
. , 156. N2O -
, -
(), () ;
190, ,
,
, . , N2O
, . , .
, Reinstrup ., -
, . , - ,
. -

50% N2O 192. A
II 346

Kaisti . ,
N2O
1 53. -
, , N2O ,
. -
N2O . N2O
. - (. . 29). -
,
182, 193, ( )
194. , 196.
, ,
, , -
. -
70% N2O - .
- -
2-, , d-. , -
N2O 53. . ,
2 , , -
195. , ,
. - ,
, , - .
N2O -
- .
. -
, N2O
- 0,15 / ( 95
, - )197.
,
. , - 0,1-0,14 /
N2O - -
. N2O 198.
, , -
. ,
, .
, N2O
, . . ,
N2O - ,
, , .
, -
. -
, .
-
, -
-
35 .
N2O- (%)

-
30 . , -
, ,
25 199.
-
20 , -
200. ,
15 201.
, , , -
10
, , , , -
(
5
)

0

1,1 150 // . ,
-N2O ,
.

. 13-13 ( %)
()
A 60% 178, 1,1
179 150 -1-1[180]
(=5 . .) -
347 13
. , -, .
( , , --
), - , (
202. , ) -
- .
.

II
, , -
.

, 65
0,03 /198. - . , -
. , area postrema,
,
8. -
,
. - . , -
. Kovarik . - -
- .
1 /. , -
210. Forster .211 , -
, ,
203. ,
, . ,
. , , -
- .
- , -
202, , . ,
, ,
.
, .
, , .
2, ,

- -
. -
-
212,213.
-
, .
-

,
-
150 ,
(), - 214.
, . , -
- ,
- . -
, ,
. - . , -
. - , -, -
, . ,
, - ,
, . . 13-3 .

.
30,204-209,
. : .
, - -
, . - ,
, 215. -
. 3% 50%, -
, , -
, ,
216. , A
II 348

--
, . , -
, -
400%, , 229. ,
- , ,
, ,
. . ,
-
-
, , .
-

217.
230. -
, -
218,219.
, -
. ,
. 231.

, - 232,233,
- , ,
, . .
, -
-
, 220, -
221. , - 234.
,
. 235. ,

- 236. ,
222. .
, , -
,
- , 237.
223. - () ,
- -
2 0,1 /. , -
- , .
224.
, , , - -
.
. , -
1 - 0,15
0,3 / -
. ,
, - .
, -
- ,
225. -
- , , -
.
226,227. , .
, -
, -
. , -
- . -
, , 238, 239
,
. , -
. , -,
239.
- ,
. , - -
240,
A 224,228. , .
349 13
, 20 /100 /, -
. 15 /100 /
. - .
-241, - 6 /100 /,
. -
(
247

II
). 15 10
( ) /100 /, -
. - , ,
, - , , -
, 69, -
. ,
, . 6-15 /100 /,
, , , -
, ,
, , 247,251.
. -
, ;
, - ,
- ,
242-244, , , 250 .
. . N2O
Tempelhoff . ,
252,
.
. -
-
( 26 -
/)245. (, ,
- ) , -
50
/246. , - .
- , -
. -
, - -
. , -
,
-
. . -
. 253,254 (. 13-15)
-

(, ).


. 82.

255. AT -
-
.

.
, -
. -

, ,
. .
NMDA --3--5--4--
(, ). - (AMPA) -
50 /100 /. Na+ 2+ (. 13-16).
, , ,
, -1,4,5- (IP3)
(. 13-14). - -
. -
, - , A
II 350

. 50


.

(/100 /)


,
. , -
2+ - 20
-
12
. , ,
. 6

.
- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
. A2,
( . .)
,
. - . 13-14 , , -
- () / .
; , 6 12 //

- ( ),
. - , , (. .
, 13-15). 247. -
- 247,248
249. -
.
250
-
. -
,
, -
, . .

.
-
, , -
NO - (. . 98). ,
. , -
. , -
-(A-)-- ,
(A), , .
. -
, - 256.
(), P. -
- .
, - .
. , ,
-
. .
, , ,
- .
. pH - -
. , 256.

, - , , -
.
. ,
NO, . -
- -
(. ), (. 13-17).
. NO -
, - 257. , -
(), - ,
. -9 -
NO, , , . -, (APAF), . -
-9 .
NO ( ) - -9, , -
. -3. ,
NO ( - , -
A ) . ( ).
351 13
-3,
(TNF) - Ca 2+ Ca 2+
-8258. , -
VGCC

. , , Ca 2+
, ,
,

II
, .

Ca2+
Na+, Ca 2+ Na+ , Ca2+

, - AMPAR mGluR
VGCC NMDAR
-
. , IP3
Ca 2+

ROS NOS
(. 13-18)259. -
NO
, -
, ONOO
.
Ca 2+
.
. - ROS

. -
PARP
-
NAD +
.
( - . 13-16 -
) -
6-8 , . -
2+-
. .
-1,4,5-
(IP3) 2+ ()
. - . --3--5--4--
(AMPA, )
, .
3-4 : -
. , , ;
,
-
; NOS
NO, , , -
2,5
(ONOO) ; -
, .
,
-
2,0 ; .
mGluR , NAD
; NMDAR N--d-
; PARP -(A-)-; ROS
1,5 ; VGCC ( ) -
(/)



. ,
1,0 ,
,
- , ,
-
0,5
259.
, -
(>1 ).
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
()
. 13-15 (
) ( 254) , -
( [] 253). .
-

256,260-262. A
II 352

266. ,
( ) : -
- , pH,
. , .
- ()

, 267. -
. , , -
( 32 34C
, , - 24 ), -
, . 6 -
.
, , . .
, - 8 .
-
. .
, -
. - ,
263. - ,
, - . ,
, (n=51)264.
, .
150 ,
- ()
265.
, ,
10 , , ,
. , -
- , -
, - , ,
. , -
, - ,
- -
, 268,269.
TNF , -

, ,
, -
8 , -
Bax
Bid
(, N2O).
. -
APAF 9

c
c 270-272. -
c 3
273.
9

Bcl
. -
274, -,
. ,
-

275. , ,
-
, -
, ,
. 13-17 , . -
C (.. ,
).
.
(APAF) -9. , -
, , .
-9 -3. -
, . 270,271. -
Bax , cl . , -
Bid,
, ,
-8
(TNF). , -8 -3. - ,
-(A-)- (P), , - 276,277. -
, , ,
(). , ,
A , ..

, , -
353 13
- ,

-
? , -

IL-1 .
Ca2+ ,
ROS -

II
. -
-


280. ,
, , -
.
GABAA L-10
BCL .
K-ATP EPO
- - ,


250. -
N2O-,
. 13-18 . (-
) 281, 282
.
,
283,284. , -
, -
. - 285. -
,
. ,
2
.
- . 14
. , . , -
, - , -
. ( Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, Moskowitz M: , ,
Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view // Trends Neurosci 1999; 22:
391-397.)
. , -
-

. , -
- 286. -
,
275,278,279. .

. - 287 288; -
, - . -
, ,
, 289.
(, - ,
).
268,269, -
, -
- , , .
, .
- , , -, ,
. NMDA-
. , -
-
(- .
, )263.
in vitro (
, - )290, in vivo
- 291
( , 292.
-). Warner , -
.275 , -
( 293 294,
) ,
--
. . , -. -
(, , - 30 -
, ) . , , ,
, , , 295; -
. , -
, . , A
II 354

NMDA- () - -
- ( , , - 306.
, ), ,
, , -
296. .
, , , -
NMDA-,
297. ,
- 307.
. - -
. -
, , -
. . -
.

. -

298 - , -
. () -
( )
-
, 299. .
,
, - . -
- ,
. ,
Stroke Trials Registry (www.strokecenter.
- org/trials/TrialDetail.aspx?tid=338) -
300. , , , .
-
, :
,
301. . ,
, - ( ), .
302. - (. ) -
303.
, - . -

. ,308 , , -
. , -
- 309,310. ,
304. .

, , , , 10-20%
- (). , -
( )311. -

, .
1,2 MA. -
, . ,
- . ,
-
, , -
, , - , .
. (-
) 70-80 . . . -
, -
NO,
(NOS)305.
- 180/105 . .312. , -
. 180-220 . . -
.
21 60 . .
- 312. ,
(
A ).
355 13
, ,
- . -
,
. .
2. 323
- 324 -
. . , -

II
, .
..
, 313, - , -
, - 325.
314-316.
, . ,
2 , , 45 ,
.
. - , ; -,
, .
(. . 48). -
, , - ,
. , . -
, - , 33-35C
. , -
, , 326.
, 60% - . ,
. , , -
- , ,
, - . ,
. , -, , -
,
317,318. . -
-
, - -
. , . -
, .
( 2-4C)
,
276,277. , . -
, (32-34C)
, , - -
, -
319,320. 6 267,327.
-
-
. -
, -
.
, .
, . - ,
-
328.
1C .
321. , ,
- ,
, .
322.
, -
I, II, III .
. , , - (
20 , ). -
(- ). ,
, - , -
, . -
( 38C)
- . ,
37-38C -
. , - - A
II 356

, -
. .
.
- ( 30-35% ) -

. - 336.
, - ,
, -
,
, .
. , 7. -
. , , ,

- (, ), -
329. , - 55%,
, 330,331, 332 .
-

. ,
(-
) . , , -
331. , , ,
- ,
, , -
(NIH), -
, .
- -
333. - - ( ).
, , -

. , - -
, .
, , . -
3 334. ,
:
- 273. -
( - , -
) , -
. , . -
, , -

, . , -
( ;
) - , -
(=8,3 /) -
. , ,
- . -
. ,
2,2 /, - -
- - - -- (, ,
335. ( ) , ,
1,1 /. ) -
,
, - ,
. .
, pH.
, -
, - -
, , -
.
. ,
. - , -
337. -
, - ( 2,
) -
A . , , 338-340,
357 13
,
339,340. , -

, 346,347. -
341, - Strandgaard,
,
. 12 343. -, -

II
,
. . -
- , . , -
, -
2 . - -,
. 348,349.

, ,
.
, , - . 63.
, -
342.
,
, -,
, , -
, - . Arbit .350
, - -
. . , ,
. -
. 2352
2351 .

-
.
. , 353.
-
, ; ,
, 30-35% , ,
, . 354. -

- , - (
) -
, , , -
343. 355.

30-35%. , ,
50% , - ,
, ,
343-345. - -
, 356. -
, - ,
, , -
.
- , ,
, - 4 , ,
. , , 357.
25% ;
( - -
)343. 25% -
, 356.
,
, -
(. . 13-4). . -
, ;

, , , -
, , , 1 -
, , - 358, .
. . . 63. A
II 358

214.
, -
, -
, 359. ,
. -
, , -
. , -
. -
. ,
200. , -
, - .
, - ,
, -
2 -. .
-
, . - .
, .
, -
, - ,
. , ,
, ,
- .


1. Drummond JC, Todd MM, U HS: The effect of 259:H269-H280, 1990. 26. Powers WJ, Raichle ME: Positron emission
high dose sodium thiopental on brain stem audi- 14. Artru AA, Nugent M, Michenfelder JD: Anes- tomography and its application to the study of
tory and median nerve somatosensory evoked thetics affect the cerebral metabolic response to cerebrovascular disease in man. Stroke 16:361-
responses in humans. Anesthesiology 63:249- circulatory catecholamines. J Neurochem 376, 1985.
254, 1985. 36:1941-1946, 1981. 27. Gibbs JM, Wise RJ, Leenders KL, et al: Evaluation
2. Peterson DO, Drummond JC, Todd MM: Effects 15. King BD, Sokoloff L, Wechsler RL: The effects of of cerebral perfusion reserve in patients with
of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, and nitrous l-epinephrine and l-norepinephrine upon cere- carotid-artery occlusion. Lancet 1:310-314, 1984.
oxide on somatosensory evoked potentials in bral circulation and metabolism in man. J Clin 28. Ferrari M, Wilson DA, Hanley DF, et al: Effects of
humans. Anesthesiology 65:35-40, 1986. Invest 31:273-279, 1952. graded hypotension on cerebral blood flow, blood
3. Michenfelder JD: Anesthesia and the Brain: Clin- 16. Madsen PL, Vorstrup S, Schmidt JF, et al: Effect volume, and mean transit time in dogs. Am J
ical, Functional, Metabolic, and Vascular Corre- of acute and prolonged treatment with proprano- Physiol 262:H1908-H1914, 1992.
lates. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1988. lol on cerebral blood flow and cerebral oxygen 29. Lanier WL, Warner DO: Intracranial elastance
4. Drummond JC: The lower limit of autoregula- metabolism in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin versus intracranial compliance: Terminology
tion: Time to revise our thinking? Anesthesiology Pharmacol 39:295-297, 1990. should agree with that of other disciplines. Anes-
86:1431-1433, 1997. 17. Schroeder T, Schierbeck J, Howardy P, et al: Effect thesiology 77:403-404, 1992.
5. Branston NM: Neurogenic control of the cerebral of labetalol on cerebral blood flow and middle 30. Artru AA: Relationship between cerebral blood
circulation. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 7:338- cerebral arterial flow velocity in healthy volun- volume and CSF pressure during anesthesia with
349, 1995. teers. Neurol Res 13:10-12, 1991. isoflurane or fentanyl in dogs. Anesthesiology
6. Gupta MM, Bithal PK, Dash HH, et al: Effects of 18. Bandres J, Yao L, Nemoto EM, et al: Effects of 60:575-579, 1984.
stellate ganglion block on cerebral haemodynam- dobutamine and dopamine on whole brain blood 31. Archer DP, Labrecque P, Tyler JL, et al: Cerebral
ics as assessed by transcranial Doppler ultra- flow and metabolism in unanesthetized monkeys. blood volume is increased in dogs during admin-
sonography. Br J Anaesth 95:669-673, 2005. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 4:250-256, 1992. istration of nitrous oxide or isoflurane. Anesthe-
7. Harrison MJ: Influence of haematocrit in the cer- 19. Townsend JB, Ziedonis DM, Bryan RM, et al: siology 67:642-648, 1987.
ebral circulation. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev Choroid plexus blood flow: Evidence for 32. Weeks JB, Todd MM, Warner DS, et al: The influ-
1:55-67, 1989. dopaminergic influence. Brain Res 290:165-169, ence of halothane, isoflurane, and pentobarbital
8. Cole DJ, Drummond JC, Patel PM, et al: Effects 1984. on cerebral plasma volume in hypocapnic and
of viscosity and oxygen content on cerebral blood 20. Prielipp RC, Wall MH, Groban L, et al: Reduced normocapnic rats. Anesthesiology 73:461-466,
flow in ischemic and normal rat brain. J Neurol regional and global cerebral blood flow during 1990.
Sci 124:15-20, 1994. fenoldopam-induced hypotension in volunteers. 33. Renou AM, Vernhiet J, Macrez P, et al: Cerebral
9. Aichner FT, Fazekas F, Brainin M, et al: Hyperv- Anesth Analg 93:45-52, 2001. blood flow and metabolism during etomidate
olemic hemodilution in acute ischemic stroke: 21. Zornow MH, Maze M, Dyck JB, et al: Dexmede anaesthesia in man. Br J Anaesth 50:1047-1051,
The Multicenter Austrian Hemodilution Stroke tomidine decreases cerebral blood flow velocity in 1978.
Trial (MAHST). Stroke 29:743-749, 1998. humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 13:350-353, 34. Jobes DR, Kennell EM, Bush GL, et al: Cerebral
10. Akopov S, Simonian N: Comparison of isradipine 1993. blood flow and metabolism during morphine-
and enalapril effects on regional carotid circula- 22. Prielipp RC, Wall MH, Tobin JR, et al: nitrous oxide anesthesia in man. Anesthesiology
tion in patients with hypertension with unilateral Dexmedetom idine-induced sedation in volun- 47:16-18, 1977.
carotid artery stenosis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol teers decreases regional and global cerebral blood 35. Vernhiet J, Macrez P, Renou AM, et al: [Effects of
30:562-570, 1997. flow. Anesth Analg 95:1052-1059, 2002. high doses of morphinomimetics (fentanyl and
11. Rogers AT, Stump DA, Gravlee GP, et al: Response 23. Drummond JC, Dao AV, Roth DM, et al: The fentathienyl) on the cerebral circulation in
of cerebral blood flow to phenylephrine infusion effect of dexmedetomidine on cerebral blood flow normal subjects.] Ann Anesthesiol Fr 18:803-810,
during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: velocity, cerebral metabolic rate and CO2 response 1977.
Influence of Paco2 management. Anesthesiology in normal humans. Anesthesiology 108:225-232, 36. Stephan H, Groger P, Weyland A, et al: [The effect
69:547-551, 1988. 2008. of sufentanil on cerebral blood flow, cerebral
12. Nemoto EM, Klementavicius R, Melick JA, et al: 24. Meyer JS, Terayama Y, Takashima S: Cerebral cir- metabolism and the CO2 reactivity of the cerebral
Norepinephrine activation of basal cerebral met- culation in the elderly. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab vessels in man.] Anaesthesist 40:153-160, 1991.
abolic rate for oxygen (CMRO2) during hypo- Rev 5:122-146, 1993. 37. Paris A, Scholz J, von Knobelsdorff G, et al: The
thermia in rats. Anesth Analg 83:1262-1267, 25. Todd MM, Weeks J: Comparative effects of effect of remifentanil on cerebral blood flow
1996. propofol, pentobarbital, and isoflurane on cere- velocity. Anesth Analg 87:569-7563, 1998.
13. Bryan RM Jr: Cerebral blood flow and energy bral blood flow and blood volume. J Neurosurg 38. Cotev S, Shalit MN: Effects on diazepam on cer-
A metabolism during stress. Am J Physiol Anesth 8:296-303, 1996. ebral blood flow and oxygen uptake after head
359 13
injury. Anesthesiology 43:117-122, 1975. 58. Matta BF, Mayberg TS, Lam AM: Direct cerebro- revision. Anesthesiology 76:71-76, 1992.
39. Forster A, Juge O, Morel D: Effects of midazolam vasodilatory effects of halothane, isoflurane and 77. Souter MJ, Andrews PJ, Piper IR, et al: Effects of
on cerebral blood flow in human volunteers. desflurane during propofol-induced isoelectric alfentanil on cerebral haemodynamics in an
Anesthesiology 56:453-455, 1982. electroencephalogram in humans. Anesthesiol- experimental model of traumatic brain injury. Br
40. Pierce EC, Lambertsen CJ, Deutsch S, et al: Cer- ogy 83:980-985, 1995. J Anaesth 79:97-102, 1997.
ebral circulation and metabolism during thiopen- 59. Cold GE, Eskesen V, Eriksen H, et al: CBF and 78. Herrick IA, Gelb AW, Manninen PH, et al: Effects
tal anesthesia and hyperventilation in man. J Clin CMRO2 during continuous etomidate infusion of fentanyl, sufentanil and alfentanil on brain
Invest 41:1664-1671, 1962. supplemented with N2O and fentanyl in patients retractor pressure. Anesth Analg 72:359-363,

II
41. Takeshita H, Okuda Y, Sari A: The effects of keta- with supratentorial cerebral tumour. A dose- 1991.
mine on cerebral circulation and metabolism in response study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 29:490- 79. From RP, Warner DS, Todd MM, et al: Anesthesia
man. Anesthesiology 36:69-75, 1972. 494, 1985. for craniotomy: A double blind comparison of
42. Stephan H, Sonntag H, Schenk HD, et al: [Effect 60. Kofke WA, Dong ML, Bloom M, et al: Transcra- alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil. Anesthesiol-
of Disoprivan (propofol) on the circulation and nial Doppler ultrasonography with induction of ogy 73:896-904, 1990.
oxygen consumption of the brain and CO2 reac- anesthesia for neurosurgery. J Neurosurg Anesth 80. Keykhah MM, Smith DS, Carlsson C, et al: Influ-
tivity of brain vessels in the human.] Anaesthesist 6:89-97, 1994. ence of sufentanil on cerebral metabolism and
36:60-65, 1987. 61. Bingham RM, Procaccio F, Prior PF, et al: Cere- circulation in the rat. Anesthesiology 63:274-277,
43. Kofke WA, Attaallah AF, Kuwabara H, et al: The bral electrical activity influences the effects of 1985.
neuropathologic effects in rats and neurometa- etomidate on cerebral perfusion pressure in trau- 81. Werner C, Hoffman WE, Baughman VL, et al:
bolic effects in humans of large dose remifentanil. matic coma. Br J Anaesth 57:843-848, 1985. Effects of sufentanil on cerebral blood flow, cer-
Anesth Analg 94:1229-1236, 2002. 62. Modica PA, Tempelhoff R: Intracranial pressure ebral blood flow velocity and metabolism in dogs.
44. Zornow MH, Fleischer JE, Scheller MS, et al: during induction of anaesthesia and tracheal Anesth Analg 72:177-181, 1991.
Dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2 adrenergic agonist, intubation with etomidate-induced EEG burst 82. Murkin JM, Farrar JK, Tweed WA: Sufentanil
decreases cerebral blood flow in the isoflurane suppression. Can J Anaesth 39:236-241, 1992. anaesthesia reduces cerebral blood flow and cer-
anesthetized dog. Anesth Analg 70:624-630, 63. Dearden NM, McDowall DG: Comparison of ebral oxygen consumption [abstract]. Can J
1990. etomidate and althesin in the reduction of Anaesth 35:S131, 1988.
45. Ogura K, Takayasu M, Dacey RG Jr: Differential increased intracranial pressure after head injury. 83. Mayer N, Weinstabl C, Podreka I, et al: Sufentanil
effects of pentobarbital on intracerebral arterioles Br J Anaesth 57:361-368, 1985. does not increase cerebral blood flow in healthy
and venules of rats in vitro. Neurosurgery 28:537- 64. Hoffman WE, Charbel FT, Edelman G, et al: human volunteers. Anesthesiology 73:240-243,
541, 1991. Comparison of the effect of etomidate and desflu- 1990.
46. Michenfelder JD: The interdependency of cere- rane on brain tissue gases and pH during pro- 84. Weinstabl C, Mayer N, Spiss CK: Sufentanil
bral functional and metabolic effects following longed middle cerebral artery occlusion. decreases cerebral blood flow velocity in patients
massive doses of thiopental in the dog. Anesthe- Anesthesiology 88:1188-1194, 1998. with elevated intracranial pressure. Eur J Anaes-
siology 41:231-236, 1974. 65. Levy ML, Aranda M, Zelman V, et al: Propylene thesiol 9:481-484, 1992.
47. Stullken EH Jr, Milde JH, Michenfelder JD, et al: glycol toxicity following continuous etomidate 85. Weinstabl C, Mayer N, Richling B, et al: Effect of
The nonlinear responses of cerebral metabolism infusion for the control of refractory cerebral sufentanil on intracranial pressure in neurosurgi-
to low concentrations of halothane, enflurane, edema. Neurosurgery 37:363-369; discussion cal patients. Anaesthesia 46:837-840, 1991.
isoflurane, and thiopental. Anesthesiology 46:28- 369-371, 1995. 86. Werner C, Kochs E, Hoffman WE, et al: Sufenta-
34, 1977. 66. Moyer JH, Pontius R, Morris G, et al: Effect of nil does not change cerebral hemodynamics and
48. Astrup J, Rosenorn J, Cold GE, et al: Minimum morphine and n-allylnormorphine on cerebral ICP in head injured patients [abstract]. J Neuro-
cerebral blood flow and metabolism during cra- hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism. Circula- surg Anaesthesiol 4:313, 1992.
niotomy. Effect of thiopental loading. Acta tion 15:379-384, 1957. 87. Jamali S, Ravussin P, Archer D, et al: The effects
Anaesthesiol Scand 28:478-481, 1984. 67. Jobes DR, Kennell E, Bitner R, et al: Effects of of bolus administration of opioids on cerebrospi-
49. Gronert GA, Michenfelder JD, Sharbrough FW, et morphine-nitrous oxide anesthesia on cerebral nal fluid pressure in patients with supratentorial
al: Canine cerebral metabolic tolerance during 24 autoregulation. Anesthesiology 42:30-34, 1975. lesions. Anesth Analg 82:600-606, 1996.
hours deep pentobarbital anesthesia. Anesthesiol- 68. Murkin JM, Farrar JK, Tweed WA, et al: Relation- 88. Lauer KK, Connolly LA, Schmeling WT: Opioid
ogy 55:110-113, 1981. ship between cerebral blood flow and O2 con- sedation does not alter intracranial pressure in
50. Sawada Y, Sugimoto H, Kobayashi H, et al: Acute sumption during high-dose narcotic anesthesia head injured patients. Can J Anaesth 44:929-933,
tolerance to high-dose barbiturate treatment in for cardiac surgery [abstract]. Anesthesiology 1997.
patients with severe head injuries. Anesthesiology 63:A44, 1985. 89. Sperry RJ, Bailey PL, Reichman MV, et al: Fenta-
56: 53-54, 1982. 69. Firestone LL, Gyulai F, Mintun M, et al: Human nyl and sufentanil increase intracranial pressure
51. Vandesteene A, Trempont V, Engelman E, et al: brain activity response to fentanyl imaged by in head trauma patients. Anesthesiology 77:416-
Effect of propofol on cerebral blood flow and positron emission tomography. Anesth Analg 420, 1992.
metabolism in man. Anaesthesia 43(Suppl):42- 82:1247-1251, 1996. 90. Werner C, Kochs E, Bause H, et al: Effects of
43, 1988. 70. McPherson RW, Krempasanka E, Eimerl D, et al: sufentanil on cerebral hemodynamics and intrac-
52. Kaisti KK, Metsahonkala L, Teras M, et al: Effects Effects of alfentanil on cerebral vascular reactivity ranial pressure in patients with brain injury.
of surgical levels of propofol and sevoflurane in dogs. Br J Anaesth 57:1232-1238, 1985. Anesthesiology 83:721-726, 1995.
anesthesia on cerebral blood flow in healthy sub- 71. Schregel W, Schafermeyer H, Muller C, et al: [The 91. Bristow A, Shalev D, Rice B, et al: Low-dose syn-
jects studied with positron emission tomography. effect of halothane, alfentanil and propofol on thetic narcotic infusions for cerebral relaxation
Anesthesiology 96:1358-1370, 2002. blood flow velocity, blood vessel cross section and during craniotomies. Anesth Analg 66:413-416,
53. Kaisti KK, Langsjo JW, Aalto S, et al: Effects of blood volume flow in the middle cerebral artery.] 1987.
sevoflurane, propofol, and adjunct nitrous oxide Anaesthesist 41:21-26, 1992. 92. Shupak RC, Harp JR: Comparison between high-
on regional cerebral blood flow, oxygen consump- 72. Mayberg TS, Lam AM, Eng CC, et al: The effect dose sufentanil-oxygen and high-dose fentanyl-
tion, and blood volume in humans. Anesthesiol- of alfentanil on cerebral blood flow velocity and oxygen for neuroanaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 57:
ogy 99:603-613, 2003. intracranial pressure during isoflurane-nitrous 375-381, 1985.
54. Alkire MT, Haier RJ, Barker SJ, et al: Cerebral oxide anesthesia in humans. Anesthesiology 93. Warner DS, Hindman BJ, Todd MM, et al: Intrac-
metabolism during propofol anesthesia in 78:288-294, 1993. ranial pressure and hemodynamic effects of
humans studied with positron emission tomogra- 73. Marx W, Shah N, Long C, et al: Sufentanil, alfen- remifentanil versus alfentanil in patients under-
phy. Anesthesiology 82:393-403, 1995. tanil, and fentanyl: Impact on cerebrospinal fluid going supratentorial craniotomy. Anesth Analg
55. Petersen KD, Landsfeldt U, Cold GE, et al: Intrac- pressure in patients with brain tumors. J Neuro- 83: 348-353, 1996.
ranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamic in surg Anesthesiol 1:3-7, 1989. 94. Ostapkovich N, Baker KZ, FogertyMack P, et al:
patients with cerebral tumors. Anesthesiology 74. Jung R, Shah N, Reinsel R, et al: Cerebrospinal Cerebral blood flow and CO2 reactivity is similar
98:329-336, 2003. fluid pressure in patients with brain tumors: during remifentanil/N2O and fentanyl/N2O anes-
56. Fox J, Gelb AW, Enns J, et al: The responsiveness Impact of fentanyl versus alfentanil during thesia. Anesthesiology 89:358-363, 1998.
of cerebral blood flow to changes in arterial nitrous oxide-oxygen anesthesia. Anesth Analg 95. Wagner K, Wiloch F, Kochs E, et al: Dose-
carbon dioxide is maintained during propofol- 71:419-422, 1990. dependent regional cerebral blood flow changes
nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans. Anesthesiol- 75. Moss E: Alfentanil increases intracranial pressure during remifentanil infusion in humans. Anes-
ogy 77:453-456, 1992. when intracranial compliance is low. Anaesthesia thesiology 94:732-739, 2001.
57. Craen RA, Gelb AW, Murkin JM, et al: Human 47:134-136, 1992. 96. Lorenz I, Kolbitsch C, Hormann C, et al: The
cerebral autoregulation is maintained during 76. Markovitz BP, Duhaime AC, Sutton L, et al: influence of nitrous oxide and remifentanil on
propofol air/O2 anesthesia [abstract]. J Neurosurg Effects of alfentanil on intracranial pressure in cerebral hemodynamics in conscious human vol-
Anesthesiol 4:298, 1992. children undergoing ventriculoperitoneal shunt unteers. Neuroimage 17:1056-1064, 2002. A
II 360

97. Kofke WA, Blissitt PA, Rao H, et al: Remifentanil- 115. Sakai K, Cho S, Fukusaki M, et al: The effects of Anesthesiology 57:A332, 1982.
induced cerebral blood flow effects in normal propofol with and without ketamine on human 134. Mielck F, Stephan H, Weyland A, et al: Effects of
humans: Dose and ApoE genotype. Anesth Analg cerebral blood flow velocity and CO2 response. one minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration
105:167-175, 2007. Anesth Analg 90:377-382, 2000. sevoflurane on cerebral metabolism, blood flow,
98. Ostapkovich ND, Baker KZ, FogartyMack P, et 116. Albanese J, Arnaud S, Rey M, et al: Ketamine and CO2 reactivity in cardiac patients. Anesth
al: Cerebral blood flow and CO2 reactivity is decreases intracranial pressure and electroen- Analg 89:364-369, 1999.
similar during remifentanil/N2O and fentanyl/ cephalographic activity in traumatic brain injury 135. Mielck F, Stephan H, Buhre W, et al: Effects of 1
N2O anesthesia. Anesthesiology 89:358-363, patients during propofol sedation. Anesthesiol- MAC desflurane on cerebral metabolism, blood
1998. ogy 87:1328-1334, 1997. flow and carbon dioxide reactivity in humans. Br
99. Forster A, Juge O, Louis M, et al: Effects of a 117. Sakabe T, Maekawa T, Ishikawa T, et al: The effects J Anaesth 81:155-160, 1998.
specific benzodiazepine antagonist (RO 15-1788) of lidocaine on canine cerebral metabolism and 136. Sakabe T, Maekawa T, Fujii S, et al: Cerebral cir-
on cerebral blood flow. Anesth Analg 66:309-313, circulation related to the electroencephalogram. culation and metabolism during enflurane anes-
1987. Anesthesiology 40:433-441, 1974. thesia in humans. Anesthesiology 59:532-536,
100. Veselis RA, Reinsel RA, Beattie BJ, et al: Mida- 118. Astrup J, Sorensen PM, Sorensen HR: Inhibition 1983.
zolam changes cerebral blood flow in discrete of cerebral oxygen and glucose consumption in 137. Johnson J, Sperry RJ, Lam A, et al: A phase III,
brain regions: an H215O positron emission tomog- the dog by hypothermia, pentobarbital, and lido- randomized, open-label study to compare sevo-
raphy study. Anesthesiology 87:1106-1117, 1997. caine. Anesthesiology 55:263-268, 1981. flurane and isoflurane in neurosurgical patients.
101. Forster A, Juge O, Morel D: Effects of midazolam 119. Lam AM, Donlon E, Eng CC, et al: The effect of Anesth Analg 80(Suppl):S214, 1995.
on cerebral hemodynamics and cerebral vasomo- lidocaine on cerebral blood flow and metabolism 138. Ornstein E, Young WL, Fleischer LH, et al: Des-
tor responsiveness to carbon dioxide. J Cereb during normocapnia and hypocapnia in humans flurane and isoflurane have similar effects on cer-
Blood Flow Metab 3:246-249, 1983. [abstract]. Anesthesiology 79:A202, 1993. ebral blood flow in patients with intracranial
102. Wolf J, Friberg L, Jensen J, et al: The effect of the 120. Bedford RF, Persing JA, Pobereskin L, et al: Lido- mass lesions. Anesthesiology 79:498-502, 1993.
benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil on regional caine or thiopental for rapid control of intracra- 139. Fraga M, Maceiras P, Rodino S, et al: The effects
cerebral blood flow in human volunteers. Br J nial hypertension? Anesth Analg 59:435-437, of isoflurane and desflurane on intracranial pres-
Anaesth 34:628-631, 1990. 1980. sure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebral
103. Knudsen L, Cold GE, Holdgard HO, et al: Effects 121. Michenfelder JD, Milde JH: Influence of anesthet- arteriovenous oxygen content differences in nor-
of flumazenil on cerebral blood flow and oxygen ics on metabolic, functional and pathological mocapnic patients with supratentorial brain
consumption after midazolam anaesthesia for responses to regional cerebral ischemia. Stroke tumors. Anesthesiology 98:1085-1090, 2003.
craniotomy. Br J Anaesth 67:277-280, 1991. 6:405-410, 1975. 140. Alkire MT, Haier RJ, Shah NK, et al: Positron
104. Chiolero RL, Ravussin P, Anderes JP, et al: The 122. Michenfelder JD, Sundt TM, Fode N, et al: Isoflu- emission tomography study of regional cerebral
effects of midazolam reversal by RO 15-1788 on rane when compared to enflurane and halothane metabolism in humans during isoflurane anes-
cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with decreases the frequency of cerebral ischemia thesia. Anesthesiology 86:549-557, 1997.
severe head injury. Intensive Care Med 14:196- during carotid endarterectomy. Anesthesiology 141. Kaisti K, Metsahonkala L, Teras M, et al: Effects
200, 1988. 67:336-340, 1987. of surgical levels of propofol and sevoflurane
105. Misfeldt BB, Jorgensen PB, Spotoft H, et al: The 123. Todd MM, Drummond JC: A comparison of the anesthesia on cerebral blood flow in healthy sub-
effects of droperidol and fentanyl on intracranial cerebrovascular and metabolic effects of halo- jects studied with positron emission tomography.
pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in neu- thane and isoflurane in the cat. Anesthesiology Anesthesiology 96:1358-1370, 2002.
rosurgical patients. Br J Anaesth 48:963-968, 60:276-282, 1984. 142. Ornstein E, Young WL, Ostapkovich N, et al:
1976. 124. Lutz LJ, Milde JH, Milde LN: The cerebral func- Comparative effects of desflurane and isoflurane
106. Michenfelder JD, Theye RA: Effects of fentanyl, tional, metabolic, and hemodynamic effects of on cerebral blood flow [abstract]. Anesthesiology
droperidol, and Innovar on canine cerebral desflurane in dogs. Anesthesiology 73:125-131, 75:A209, 1991.
metabolism and blood flow. Br J Anaesth 43:630- 1990. 143. Algotsson L, Messeter K, Rosen I, et al: Effects of
636, 1971. 125. Scheller MS, Tateishi A, Drummond JC, et al: The nitrous oxide on cerebral haemodynamics and
107. Strebel S, Kaufmann M, Maitre L, et al: Effects of effects of sevoflurane on cerebral blood flow, cer- metabolism during isoflurane anaesthesia in man.
ketamine on cerebral blood flow velocity in ebral metabolic rate for oxygen, intracranial pres- Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 36:46-52, 1992.
humans. Influence of pretreatment with mida- sure, and the electroencephalogram are similar to 144. Reinstrup P, Ryding E, Algotsson L, et al: Regional
zolam or esmolol. Anaesthesia 50:223-228, 1995. those of isoflurane in the rabbit. Anesthesiology cerebral blood flow (SPECT) during anaesthesia
108. Cavazzuti M, Porro CA, Biral GP, et al: Ketamine 68:548-551, 1988. with isoflurane and nitrous oxide in humans. Br
effects on local cerebral blood flow and metabo- 126. Michenfelder JD, Cucchiara RF: Canine cerebral J Anaesth 78:407-411, 1997.
lism in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 7:806- oxygen consumption during enflurane anesthesia 145. Bundgaard H, von Oettingen G, Larsen KM, et al:
811, 1987. and its modification during induced seizures. Effects of sevoflurane on intracranial pressure,
109. Vollenweider FX, Leenders KL, Oye I, et al: Dif- Anesthesiology 40:575-580, 1974. cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolism. A
ferential psychopathology and patterns of cere- 127. Drummond JC, Todd MM, Scheller MS, et al: A dose-response study in patients subjected to cra-
bral glucose utilisation produced by (S)- and (R)- comparison of the direct cerebral vasodilating niotomy for cerebral tumours. Acta Anaesthesiol
ketamine in healthy volunteers using positron potencies of halothane and isoflurane in the New Scand 42:621-627, 1998.
emission tomography (PET). Eur Neuropsychop- Zealand white rabbit. Anesthesiology 65:462-467, 146. Madsen JB, Cold GE, Hansen ES, et al: The effect
harmacol 7:25-38, 1997. 1986. of isoflurane on cerebral blood flow and metabo-
110. Vollenweider FX, Leenders KL, Scharfetter C, et 128. Hansen TD, Warner DS, Todd MM, et al: Distri- lism in humans during craniotomy for small
al: Metabolic hyperfrontality and psychopathol- bution of cerebral blood flow during halothane supratentorial cerebral tumors. Anesthesiology
ogy in the ketamine model of psychosis using versus isoflurane anesthesia in rats. Anesthesiol- 66:332-336, 1987.
positron emission tomography (PET) and [18F] ogy 69:332-337, 1988. 147. Kolbitsch C, Lorenz IH, Hormann C, et al: Sevo-
fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Eur Neuropsychop- 129. Lenz C, Rebel A, Klaus V, et al: Local cerebral flurane and nitrous oxide increase regional cere-
harmacol 7:9-24, 1997. blood flow, local cerebral glucose utilization, and bral blood flow (rCBF) and regional cerebral
111. Holcomb HH, Lahti AC, Medoff DR, et al: flow-metabolism coupling during sevoflurane blood volume (rCBV) in a drug-specific manner
Sequential regional cerebral blood flow brain versus isoflurane anesthesia in rats. Anesthesiol- in human volunteers. Magn Reson Imaging
scans using PET with H215O demonstrate keta- ogy 89:1480-1488, 1998. 19:1253-1260, 2001.
mine actions in CNS dynamically. Neuropsy- 130. Heath KJ, Gupta S, Matta BF: The effects of sevo- 148. Kolbitsch C, Lorenz IH, Hormann C, et al: A sub-
chopharmacology 25:165-172, 2001. flurane on cerebral hemodynamics during propo- anesthetic concentration of sevoflurane increases
112. Schmidt A, Ryding E, Akeson J: Racemic keta- fol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 85:1284-1287, 1997. regional cerebral blood flow and regional cerebral
mine does not abolish cerebrovascular autoregu- 131. Wollman H, Alexander SC, Cohen PJ, et al: Cer- blood volume and decreases regional mean
lation in the pig. Acta Anesthesiol Scand ebral circulation of man during halothane anes- transit time and regional cerebrovascular resist-
47:569-575, 2003. thesia. Anesthesiology 25:180-184, 1964. ance in volunteers. Anesth Analg 91:156-162,
113. Mayberg TS, Lam AM, Matta BF, et al: Ketamine 132. Murphy FL, Kennell EM, Johnstone RE, et al: The 2000.
does not increase cerebral blood flow velocity or effects of enflurane, isoflurane, and halothane on 149. Alkire MT, Pomfrett CJ, Haier RJ, et al: Func-
intracranial pressure during isoflurane/nitrous cerebral blood flow and metabolism in man tional brain imaging during anesthesia in
oxide anesthesia in patients undergoing craniot- [abstract]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting humans: Effects of halothane on global and
omy. Anesth Analg 81:84-89, 1995. of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, regional cerebral glucose metabolism. Anesthesi-
114. Strebel S, Kaufmann M, Matre L, et al: Effects of October 1974, pp 62-63. ology 90:701-709, 1999.
ketamine on cerebral blood flow velocity in 133. Todd MM, Drummond JC, Shapiro HM: Com- 150. Young WL, Prohovnik I, Ornstein E, et al: The
humans. Influence of pretreatment with mida- parative cerebrovascular and metabolic effects of effect of arteriovenous malformation resection on
A zolam or esmolol. Anaesthesia 50:223-228, 1995. halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane [abstract]. cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide.
361 13
Neurosurgery 27:257-267, 1990. 1983. oxide-isoflurane anesthesia causes more cerebral
151. Kuroda Y, Murakami M, Tsuruta J, et al: Blood 172. Fleischer LH, Young WL, Ornstein E, et al: Cer- vasodilation than an equipotent dose of isoflu-
flow velocity of middle cerebral artery during ebral blood flow in humans does not decline over rane in humans. Anesth Analg 78:462-468, 1994
prolonged anesthesia with halothane, isoflurane, time during isoflurane or desflurane anesthesia 192. Reinstrup P, Ryding E, Ohlsson T, et al: Cerebral
and sevoflurane in humans. Anesthesiology [abstract]. Anesthesiology 77:A167, 1992. blood volume (CBV) in humans during normo-
87:527-532, 1997. 173. Madsen JB, Cold GE, Hansen ES, et al: The effect and hypocapnia: Influence of nitrous oxide
152. Sanders RD, Maze M: Xenon: From stranger to of isoflurane on cerebral blood flow and metabo- (N2O). Anesthesiology 95:1079-1082, 2001.
guardian. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 18:405-411, lism in humans during craniotomy for small 193. Baughman VL, Hoffman WE, Miletich DJ, et al:

II
2005. supratentorial cerebral tumors. Anesthesiology Cerebrovascular and cerebral metabolic effects of
153. Franks NP, Dickinson R, de Sousa SL, et al: How 66:332, 1987. N2O in unrestrained rats. Anesthesiology 73:269-
does xenon produce anaesthesia? Nature 396:324, 174. Drummond JC, Todd MM: The response of the 272, 1990.
1998. feline cerebral circulation to Paco2 during anes- 194. Wollman H, Alexander C, Cohen PJ, et al: Cere-
154. Gruss M, Bushell TJ, Bright DP, et al: Two-pore- thesia with isoflurane and halothane and during bral circulation during general anesthesia and
domain K+ channels are a novel target for the sedation with nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology hyperventilation in man.: Thiopental induction to
anesthetic gases xenon, nitrous oxide, and cyclo- 62:268-273, 1985. nitrous oxide and d-tubocurarine. Anesthesiol-
propane. Mol Pharmacol 65:443-452, 2004. 175. Gupta S, Heath K, Matta BF: Effect of incremental ogy 26:329-334, 1965.
155. Laitio RM, Kaisti KK, Laangsjo JW, et al: Effects doses of sevoflurane on cerebral pressure autoreg- 195. Drummond JC, Scheller MS, Todd MM: The
of xenon anesthesia on cerebral blood flow in ulation in humans. Br J Anaesth 79:469-472, effect of nitrous oxide on cortical cerebral blood
humans: A positron emission tomography study. 1997. flow during anesthesia with halothane and isoflu-
Anesthesiology 106:1128-1133, 2007. 176. Vavilala MS, Lee LA, Lee M, et al: Cerebral rane, with and without morphine, in the rabbit.
156. Rex S, Schaefer W, Meyer PH, et al: Positron emis- autoregulation in children during sevoflurane Anesth Analg 66:1083-1089, 1987.
sion tomography study of regional cerebral anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 90:636-641, 2003. 196. Tarkkanen L, Laitinen L, Johansson G: Effects of
metabolism during general anesthesia with xenon 177. Lu H, Werner C, Englehard K, et al: The effects of d-tubocurarine on intracranial pressure and tha-
in humans. Anesthesiology 105:936-943, 2006. sevoflurane on cerebral blood flow autoregulation lamic electrical impedance. Anesthesiology
157. Schmidt M, Marx T, PappJambor C, et al: Effect in rats. Anesth Analg 87:854-858, 1998. 40:247-251, 1974.
of xenon on cerebral autoregulation in pigs. 178. Field LM, Dorrance DE, Krzeminska EK, et al: 197. Schramm WM, Papousek A, MichalekSauberer
Anaesthesia 57:960-966, 2002. Effect of nitrous oxide on cerebral blood flow A, et al: The cerebral and cardiovascular effects of
158. Schmidt M, Marx T, Armbruster S, et al: Effect of in normal humans. Br J Anaesth 70:154-159, cisatracurium and atracurium in neurosurgical
xenon on elevated intracranial pressure as com- 1993. patients. Anesth Analg 86:123-127, 1998.
pared with nitrous oxide and total intravenous 179. Lam AM, Mayberg TS, Eng CC, et al: Nitrous 198. Stirt JA, Grosslight KR, Bedford RF, et al: Defas-
anesthesia in pigs. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand oxide-isoflurane anesthesia causes more cerebral ciculation with metocurine prevents succinyl-
49:494-501, 2005. vasodilation than an equipotent dose of isoflu- choline induced increases in intracranial pressure.
159. Reinelt H, Schirmer U, Marx T, et al: Diffusion of rane in humans. Anesth Analg 78:462-468, 1994. Anesthesiology 67:50, 1987.
xenon and nitrous oxide into the bowel. Anesthe- 180. Eng C, Lam AM, Mayberg TS, et al: The influence 199. Lanier WL, Milde JH, Michenfelder JD: The
siology 94:475-477; discussion 6A, 2001. of propofol with and without nitrous oxide on cerebral effects of pancuronium and atracurium
160. Milde LN, Milde JH: Cerebral effects of sufentanil cerebral blood flow velocity and CO2 reactivity in in halothane-anesthetized dogs. Anesthesiology
in dogs with reduced intracranial compliance. humans. Anesthesiology 77:872-879, 1992. 63:589-597, 1985.
Anesth Analg 68(Suppl):S196, 1989. 181. Henriksen HT, Jorgensen PB: The effect of nitrous 200. Tateishi A, Fleischer JE, Drummond JC, et al:
161. Maksimow A, Kaisti K, Aalto S, et al: Correlation oxide on intracranial pressure in patients with Nimodipine does not improve neurologic
of EEG spectral entropy with regional cerebral intracranial disorders. Br J Anaesth 45:486-492, outcome after 14 minutes of cardiac arrest in cats.
blood flow during sevoflurane and propofol 1973. Stroke 20:1044-1050, 1989.
anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 60:862-869, 2005. 182. Pelligrino DA, Miletich DJ, Hoffman WE, et al: 201. Standaert FG: Magic bullets, science, and medi-
162. Boarini DJ, Kassell NF, Coester HC, et al: Com- Nitrous oxide markedly increases cerebral corti- cine. Anesthesiology 63:577-578, 1985.
parison of systemic and cerebrovascular effects of cal metabolic rate and blood flow in the goat. 202. Lanier WL, Iaizzo PA, Milde JH, et al: The cere-
isoflurane and halothane. Neurosurgery 15:400- Anesthesiology 60:405-412, 1984. bral and systemic effects of movement in response
409, 1984. 183. Phirman JR, Shapiro HM: Modification of nitrous to a noxious stimulus in lightly anesthetized
163. Reinstrup P, Ryding E, Algotsson L, et al: Distri- oxide-induced intracranial hypertension by prior dogs. Possible modulation of cerebral function
bution of cerebral blood flow during anesthesia induction of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 46:150- by muscle afferents. Anesthesiology 80:392-401,
with isoflurane or halothane in humans. Anesthe- 151, 1977. 1994.
siology 82:359-366, 1995. 184. Misfeldt BB, Jorgensen PB, Rishoj M: The effect 203. Kovarik WD, Mayberg TS, Lam AM, et al: Suc-
164. Maekawa T, Tommasino C, Shapiro HM, et al: of nitrous oxide and halothane upon the intrac- cinylcholine does not change intracranial pres-
Local cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization ranial pressure in hypocapnic patients with sure, cerebral blood flow velocity, or the
during isoflurane anesthesia in the rat. Anesthe- intracranial disorders. Br J Anaesth 46:853-858, electroencephalogram in patients with neurologic
siology 65:144-151, 1986. 1974. injury. Anesth Analg 78:469-473, 1994.
165. Eintrei C, Leszniewski W, Carlsson C: Local 185. Jung R, Reinsel R, Marx W, et al: Isoflurane and 204. Artru AA: Relationship between cerebral blood
application of 133xenon for measurement of nitrous oxide: Comparative impact on cerebro- volume and CSF pressure during anesthesia with
regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) during halo- spinal fluid pressure in patients with brain halothane or enflurane in dogs. Anesthesiology
thane, enflurane, and isoflurane anesthesia in tumors. Anesth Analg 75:724-728, 1992. 58:533-539, 1983.
humans. Anesthesiology 63:391-394, 1985. 186. WilsonSmith E, Karsli C, Luginbuehl IA, et al: 205. Artru AA: Isoflurane does not increase the rate of
166. Adams RW, Cucchiara RF, Gronert GA: Isoflu- The effect of nitrous oxide on cerebral blood flow CSF production in the dog. Anesthesiology
rane and cerebrospinal fluid pressure in neuro- velocity in children anesthetized with propofol. 60:193-197, 1984.
surgical patients. Anesthesiology 54:97, 1981. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 47:307-311, 2003. 206. Artru AA: Effects of halothane and fentanyl anes-
167. Grosslight K, Foster R, Colohan AR, et al: Isoflu- 187. Manohar M, Parks C: Porcine regional brain and thesia on resistance to reabsorption of CSF. J Neu-
rane for neuroanesthesia: Risk factors for myocardial blood flows during halothane-O2 and rosurg 60:252-256, 1984.
increases in intracranial pressure. Anesthesiology halothane-nitrous oxide anesthesia: Comparisons 207. Artru AA, Nugent M, Michenfelder JD: Enflurane
63:533, 1985. with equipotent isoflurane anesthesia. Am J Vet causes a prolonged and reversible increase in the
168. Campkin TV, Flinn RM: Isoflurane and cerebro- Res 45:465-473, 1984. rate of CSF production in the dog. Anesthesiol-
spinal fluid pressurea study in neurosurgical 188. Drummond JC, Todd MM, Schubert A, et al: ogy 57:255-260, 1982.
patients undergoing intracranial shunt proce- Effect of the acute administration of high dose 208. Maktabi MA, Elbokl FF, Faraci FM, et al: Halo-
dures. Anaesthesia 44:50-54, 1989. pentobarbital on human brain stem auditory and thane decreases the rate of production of cerebro-
169. Scheller MS, Todd MM, Drummond JC: A com- median nerve somatosensory evoked responses. spinal fluid. Possible role of vasopressin V1
parison of the ICP effects of isoflurane and halo- Neurosurgery 20:830-835, 1987. receptors. Anesthesiology 78:72-82, 1993.
thane after cryogenic brain injury in rabbits. 189. Todd MM: The effects of Paco2 on the cerebro- 209. Artru AA: Rate of cerebrospinal fluid formation,
Anesthesiology 67:507-512, 1987. vascular response to nitrous oxide in the halo- resistance to reabsorption of cerebrospinal fluid,
170. Warner DS, Boarini DJ, Kassell NF: Cerebrovas- thane-anesthetized rabbit. Anesth Analg brain tissue water content, and electroencephalo-
cular adaptation to prolonged halothane anesthe- 66:1090-1095, 1987. gram during desflurane anesthesia in dogs. J Neu-
sia is not related to cerebrospinal fluid pH. 190. Strebel S, Kaufmann M, Anselmi L, et al: Nitrous rosurg Anesthesiol 5:178-186, 1993.
Anesthesiology 63:243-248, 1985. oxide is a potent cerebrovasodilator in humans 210. Johansson BB, Linder LE: Do nitrous oxide and
171. Albrecht RF, Miletich DJ, Madala LR: Normaliza- when added to isoflurane. A transcranial Doppler lidocaine modify the blood-brain barrier in acute
tion of cerebral blood flow during prolonged study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 39:653-658, 1995. hypertension in the rat? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
halothane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 58:26-31, 191. Lam AM, Mayberg TS, Eng CC, et al: Nitrous 24:65-68, 1980. A
II 362

211. Forster A, Van Horn K, Marshall LF, et al: Anes- thiopental. Anesth Analg 56:479-485, 1977. thesia and hypothermia on canine cerebral ATP
thetic effects on blood-brain barrier function 235. Laughlin TP, Newberg LA: Prolonged myoclonus and lactate during anoxia produced by decapita-
during acute arterial hypertension. Anesthesiol- after etomidate anesthesia. Anesth Analg 64:80- tion. Anesthesiology 33:430-439, 1970.
ogy 49:26-30, 1978. 82, 1985. 255. Siesjo BK: Pathophysiology and treatment of focal
212. Modica PA, Tempelhoff R, White PF: Pro- and 236. Ebrahim ZY, DeBoer GE, Luders H, et al: Effect cerebral ischemia. Part I: Pathophysiology. J Neu-
anticonvulsant effects of anesthetics (Part I). of etomidate on the electroencephalogram of rosurg 77:169-184, 1992.
Anesth Analg 70:303-315, 1990. patients with epilepsy. Anesth Analg 65:1004- 256. Lipton P: Ischemic cell death in brain neurons.
213. Modica PA, Tempelhoff R, White PF: Pro- and 1006, 1986. Phys Rev 79:1431-1568, 1999.
anticonvulsant effects of anesthetics (Part II). 237. Gancher S, Laxer KD, Krieger W: Activation of 257. Fiskum G, Murphy AN, Beal MF: Mitochondria
Anesth Analg 70:433-444, 1990. epileptogenic activity by etomidate. Anesthesiol- in neurodegeneration: Acute ischemia and
214. Kreisman NR, Magee JC, Brizzee BL: Relative ogy 61:616-618, 1984. chronic neurodegenerative diseases. J Cereb
hypoperfusion in rat cerebral cortex during 238. Samra SK, Sneyd JR, Ross DA, et al: Effects of Blood Flow Metab 19:351-369, 1999.
recurrent seizures. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab propofol sedation on seizures and intracranially 258. Velier JJ, Ellison JA, Kikly KK, et al: Caspase-8
11:77-87, 1991. recorded epileptiform activity in patients with and caspase-3 are expressed by different popula-
215. Neigh JL, Garman JK, Harp JR: The electroen- partial epilepsy. Anesthesiology 82:843-851, tions of cortical neurons undergoing delayed cell
cephalographic pattern during anesthesia with 1995. death after focal stroke in the rat. J Neurosci
Ethrane: Effects of depth of anesthesia, Paco2, and 239. Lowson S, Gent JP, Goodchild CS: Convulsive 19:5932-5941, 1999.
nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology 35:482-487, 1971. thresholds in mice during the recovery phase 259. Kawaguchi M, Kimbro JR, Drummond JC, et al:
216. Wollman H, Smith AL, Hoffman JC: Cerebral from anaesthesia induced by propofol, thiopen- Isoflurane delays but does not prevent cerebral
blood flow and oxygen consumption in man tone, methohexitone and etomidate. Br J Pharma- infarction in rats subjected to focal ischemia.
during electroencephalographic seizure patterns col 102:879-882, 1991. Anesthesiology 92:1335-1342, 2000.
induced by anesthesia with Ethrane [abstract]. 240. Rampton AJ, Griffin RM, Stuart CS, et al: Com- 260. Zauner A, Daugherty WP, Bullock MR, et al:
Fed Proc 28:356, 1967. parison of methohexital and propofol for electro- Brain oxygenation and energy metabolism: Part
217. Flemming DC, Fitzpatrick J, Fariello RG, et al: convulsive therapy: Effects on hemodynamic Ibiological function and pathophysiology. Neu-
Diagnostic activation of epileptogenic foci by responses and seizure duration. Anesthesiology rosurgery 51:289-301, 2002.
enflurane. Anesthesiology 52:431-433, 1980. 70:412-417, 1989. 261. Mattson MP, Duan W, Pedersen WA, et al: Neu-
218. Opitz A, Brecht S, Stenzel E: [Enflurane anaesthe- 241. Drummond JC, IraguiModoz VJ, Alksne JF, rodegenerative disorders and ischemic brain dis-
sia for epileptic patients (authors transl).] Anaes- Kalkman CJ: Masking of epileptiform activity by eases. Apoptosis 6:69-81, 2001.
thesist 26:329-332, 1977. propofol during seizure surgery. Anesthesiology 262. Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, Moskowitz M: Pathobiol-
219. Kruczek M, Albin MS, Wolf S, et al: Postoperative 77:837-838, 1992. ogy of ischaemic stroke: An integrated view.
seizure activity following enflurane anesthesia. 242. Murkin JM, Moldenhauer CC, Hug CC Jr, et al: Trends Neurosci 22:391-397, 1999.
Anesthesiology 53:175-176, 1980. Absence of seizures during induction of anesthe- 263. Abramson NA: Randomized clinical study of
220. Hymes JA: Seizure activity during isoflurane sia with high-dose fentanyl. Anesth Analg 63:489- thiopental loading in comatose survivors of
anesthesia. Anesth Analg 64:367-368, 1985. 494, 1984. cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 314:397-403, 1986.
221. Harrison JL: Postoperative seizures after 243. Smith NT, Westover CJ Jr, Quinn M, et al: An 264. Forsman M, Aarseth HP, Nordby HK, et al:
isoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 65:1235- electroencephalographic comparison of alfentanil Effects of nimodipine on cerebral blood flow and
1236, 1986. with other narcotics and with thiopental. J Clin cerebrospinal fluid pressure after cardiac arrest:
222. Kofke WA, Young RS, Davis P, et al: Isoflurane for Monit 1:236-244, 1985. Correlation with neurologic outcome. Anesth
refractory status epilepticus: A clinical series. 244. Smith NT, DecSilver H, Sanford TJ Jr, et al: EEGs Analg 68:436-443, 1989.
Anesthesiology 71:653-659, 1989. during high-dose fentanyl-, sufentanil-, or mor- 265. Roine RO, Kaste M, Kinnunen A, et al: Nimodi-
223. Komatsu H, Nogaya J, Ogli K: Volatile anaesthet- phine-oxygen anesthesia. Anesth Analg 63:386- pine after resuscitation from out-of-hospital ven-
ics as central nervous system excitants. Ann Acad 393, 1984. tricular fibrillation. A placebo-controlled,
Med Singapore 23:130-138, 1994. 245. Tempelhoff R, Modica PA, Bernardo KL, et al: double-blind, randomized trial. JAMA 264:3171-
224. Kaisti K, Jaaskelainen S, Rinne JO, et al: Epilepti- Fentanyl-induced electrocorticographic seizures 3177, 1990.
form discharges during 2 MAC sevoflurane anes- in patients with complex partial epilepsy. J Neu- 266. A randomized clinical study of a calcium-entry
thesia in two healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology rosurg 77:201-208, 1992. blocker (lidoflazine) in the treatment of comatose
91:1952-1955, 1999. 246. Cascino GD, So EL, Sharbrough FW, et al: Alfen- survivors of cardiac arrest. Brain Resuscitation
225. Hisada K, Morioka T, Fukui K, et al: Electrocor- tanil-induced epileptiform activity in patients Clinical Trial II Study Group. N Engl J Med
ticographic activities in patients with temporal with partial epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 10:520- 324:1225-1231, 1991.
lobe epilepsy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 13:333- 525, 1993. 267. Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group:
337, 2001. 247. Astrup J, Symon L, Branston NM, et al: Cortical Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the
226. Hilty CA, Drummond JC: Seizure-like activity on evoked potential and extracellular K+ and H+ at neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J
emergence from sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthe- critical levels of brain ischemia. Stroke 8:51-57, Med 346:549-656, 2002.
siology 93:1357-1358, 2000. 1977. 268. Hoffman WE, Cheng MA, Thomas C, et al: Clo-
227. Terasako K, Ishii S: Postoperative seizure-like 248. Branston NM, Symon L, Crockard HA, et al: Rela- nidine decreases plasma catecholamines and
activity following sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth tionship between the cortical evoked potential improves outcome from incomplete ischemia in
Analg 96:1239-1240, 2003. and local cortical blood flow following acute the rat. Anesth Analg 73:460-464, 1991.
228. Archer DP, McKenna JM, Morin L, et al: Con- middle cerebral artery occlusion in the baboon. 269. Hoffman WE, Thomas C, Albrecht RF: The effect
scious-sedation analgesia during craniotomy for Exp Neurol 45:195-208, 1974. of halothane and isoflurane on neurologic
intractable epilepsy: A review of 354 consecutive 249. Jones TH, Morawetz RB, Crowell RM, et al: outcome following incomplete cerebral ischemia
cases. Can J Anaesth 35:338-344, 1988. Thresholds of focal cerebral ischemia in awake in the rat. Anesth Analg 76:279-283, 1993.
229. Todd MM, Drummond JC, U HS: The hemody- monkeys. J Neurosurg 54:773-782, 1981. 270. Smith AL, Hoff JT, Nielsen SL, et al: Barbiturate
namic consequences of high-dose methohexital 250. Michenfelder JD, Sundt TM, Fode N, et al: Isoflu- protection in acute focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke
anesthesia in humans. Anesthesiology 61:495- rane when compared to enflurane and halothane 5:1-7, 1974.
501, 1984. decreases the frequency of cerebral ischemia 271. Michenfelder JD, Milde JH, Sundt TM: Cerebral
230. Bennett DR, Madsen JA, Jordan WS, et al: Keta- during carotid endarterectomy. Anesthesiology protection by barbiturate anesthesia. Arch Neurol
mine anesthesia in brain-damaged epileptics. 67:336-340, 1987. 33:345-350, 1976.
Electroencephalographic and clinical observa- 251. Hossmann KA: Viability thresholds and the 272. Nehls DG, Todd MM, Spetzler RF, et al: A
tions. Neurology 23:449-460, 1973. penumbra of focal ischemia. Ann Neurol 36:557- comparison of the cerebral protective effects of
231. FerrerAllado T, Brechner VL, Dymond A, et al: 565, 1994. isoflurane and barbiturates during temporary
Ketamine-induced electroconvulsive phenomena 252. Sundt TM Jr, Sharbrough FW, Piepgras DG, et al: focal ischemia in primates. Anesthesiology
in the human limbic and thalamic regions. Anes- Correlation of cerebral blood flow and electroen- 66:453-464, 1987.
thesiology 38:333-344, 1973. cephalographic changes during carotid endarter- 273. Nussmeier NA, Arlund C, Slogoff S: Neuropsy-
232. Steen PA, Michenfelder JD: Neurotoxicity of ectomy with results of surgery and hemodynamics chiatric complications after cardiopulmonary
anesthetics. Anesthesiology 50:437-453, 1979. of cerebral ischemia. Mayo Clin Proc 56:533-543, bypass: Cerebral protection by a barbiturate.
233. Hirshman CA, Krieger W, Littlejohn G, et al: 1981. Anesthesiology 64:165-170, 1986.
Ketamine-aminophylline-induced decrease in 253. Michenfelder JD, Sundt TM Jr: Cerebral ATP and 274. Shapiro HM: Barbiturates in brain ischaemia. Br
seizure threshold. Anesthesiology 56:464-467, lactate levels in the squirrel monkey following J Anaesth 57:82-95, 1985.
1982. occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Stroke 275. Warner DS, Takaoka S, Wu B, et al: Electroen-
234. Ghoneim MM, Yamada T: Etomidate: A clinical 2:319-326, 1971. cephalographic burst suppression is not required
A and electroencephalographic comparison with 254. Michenfelder JD, Theye RA: The effects of anes- to elicit maximal neuroprotection from pentobar-
363 13
bital in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia. culture model. Anesthesiology 99:748-751, 2003. bral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy.
Anesthesiology 84:1475-1484, 1996. 295. Ma D, Hossain M, Pettet GK, et al: Xenon precon- Circulation 45:1091-1096, 1972.
276. Busto R, Dietrich WD, Globus MY, et al: Small ditioning reduces brain damage from neonatal 315. Christensen MS, Paulson OB, Olesen J, et al: Cer-
differences in intraischemic brain temperature asphyxia in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab ebral apoplexy (stroke) treated with or without
critically determine the extent of ischemic neu- 26:199-208, 2006. prolonged artificial hyperventilation: 1. Cerebral
ronal injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 7:729- 296. JevtovicTodorovic V, Beals J, Benshoff N, et al: circulation, clinical course and cause of death.
738, 1987. Prolonged exposure to inhalational anesthetic Stroke 4:568, 1973.
277. Sano T, Drummond JC, Patel PM, et al: A com- nitrous oxide kills neurons in adult rat brain. 316. Ruta TS, Drummond JC, Cole DJ: The effect of

II
parison of the cerebral protective effects of isoflu- Neuroscience 122:609-616, 2003. acute hypocapnia on local cerebral blood flow
rane and mild hypothermia in a rat model of 297. Williamson PB, Ma D, Hossain M, et al: Xenon during middle cerebral artery occlusion in isoflu-
incomplete forebrain ischemia. Anesthesiology does not cause apoptotic neurodegeneration in rane anesthetized rats. Anesthesiology 78:134-
76:221-228, 1992. the neonatal rat and protects against isoflurane- 140, 1993.
278. Warner DS, Zhou J, Ramani R, et al: Reversible induced apoptosis [abstract]. Anesthesiology 317. Nemoto EM, Klementavicius R, Melick JA, et al:
focal ischemia in the rat: Effects of halothane, 101(Suppl):A864, 2004. Suppression of cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen
isoflurane, and methohexital anesthesia. J Cereb 298. Ravussin P, de Tribolet N: Total intravenous anes- (CMRO2) by mild hypothermia compared with
Blood Flow Metab 11:794-802, 1991. thesia with propofol for burst suppression in cer- thiopental. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 8:52-59,
279. Drummond JC, Cole DJ, Patel PM, et al: Focal ebral aneurysm surgery: Preliminary report of 42 1996.
cerebral ischemia during anesthesia with etomi- patients. Neurosurgery 32:236-240; discussion 318. Klementavicius R, Nemoto EM, Yonas H: The Q10
date, isoflurane, or thiopental: A comparison of 240, 1993. ratio for basal cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen
the extent of cerebral injury. Neurosurgery 299. Ridenour TR, Warner DS, Todd MM, et al: Com- in rats. J Neurosurg 85:482-487, 1996.
37:742-748; discussion 748-749, 1995. parative effects of propofol and halothane on 319. BorisMoller F, Smith ML, Siesjo BK: Effects of
280. Cole DJ, Cross LM, Drummond JC, et al: Thio- outcome from temporary middle cerebral artery hypothermia on ischemic brain damage: A com-
pentone and methohexital, but not pentobarbi- occlusion in the rat. Anesthesiology 76:807-812, parison between preischemic and postischemia
tone, reduce early focal cerebral ischemic injury 1992. cooling. Neurosci Res Commun 5:87-94, 1989.
in rats. Can J Anaesth 48:807-814, 2001. 300. Gelb AW, Bayona NA, Wilson JX, et al: Propofol 320. Buchan A, Pulsinelli WA: Hypothermia but not
281. Baughman VL, Hoffman WE, Miletich DJ, et al: anesthesia compared to awake reduces infarct size the N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist, MK-801,
Neurologic outcome in rats following incomplete in rats. Anesthesiology 96:1183-1190, 2002. attenuates neuronal damage in gerbils subjected
cerebral ischemia during halothane, isoflurane or 301. Pittman JE, Sheng H, Pearlstein RD, et al: Com- to transient global ischemia. J Neurosci 10:311-
N2O. Anesthesiology 69:192-198, 1988. parison of the effects of propofol and pentobarbi- 316, 1990.
282. SoonthanBrant V, Patel PM, Drummond JC, et tal on neurologic outcome and cerebral infarction 321. Hindman BJ, Todd MM, Gelb AW, et al: Mild
al: Fentanyl does not increase brain injury after size after temporary focal ischemia in the rat. hypothermia as a protective therapy during
focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Anesth Analg Anesthesiology 87:1139-1144, 1997. intracranial aneurysm surgery: A randomized
88:49-55, 1999. 302. Bayona NA, Gelb AW, Jiang Z, et al: Propofol prospective pilot trial. Neurosurgery 44:23-32;
283. Mackensen GB, Nellgard B, Kudo M, et al: Peri- neuroprotection in cerebral ischemia and its discussion 32-33, 1999.
ischemic cerebral blood flow (CBF) does not effects on low-molecular-weight antioxidants and 322. Todd MM, Hindman BJ, Clarke WR, et al: Mild
explain beneficial effects of isoflurane on outcome skilled motor tasks. Anesthesiology 100:1151- intraoperative hypothermia during surgery for
from near complete forebrain ischemia in rats. 1159, 2004. intracranial aneurysm. N Engl J Med 352:135-
Anesthesiology 93:1102-1106, 2000. 303. Engelhard K, Werner C, Eberspacher E, et al: 145, 2005.
284. Nellgard B, Mackensen GB, Pineda J, et al: Anes- Influence of propofol on neuronal damage and 323. Shiozaki T, Sugimoto H, Taneda M, et al: Effect
thetic effects on cerebral metabolic rate predict apoptotic factors after incomplete cerebral of mild hypothermia on uncontrollable intracra-
histologic outcome from near-complete forebrain ischemia and reperfusion in rats: A long-term nial hypertension after severe head injury. J Neu-
ischemia in the rat. Anesthesiology 93:431-436, observation. Anesthesiology 101:912-917, 2004. rosurg 79:363-368, 1993.
2000. 304. Batjer HH, Frankfurt AI, Purdy PD, et al: Use of 324. Clifton GL, Allen S, Barrodale P, et al: A phase II
285. Kawaguchi M, Kimbro JR, Drummond JC, et al: etomidate, temporary arterial occlusion, and study of moderate hypothermia in severe brain
Effects of isoflurane on neuronal apoptosis in rats intraoperative angiography in surgical treatment injury. J Neurotrauma 10:263-271, 1993.
subjected to focal ischemia. J Neurosurg Anesthe- of large and giant cerebral aneurysms. J Neuro- 325. Clifton GL, Miller ET, Choi SC, et al: Lack of
siol 12:385, 2000. surg 68:234-240, 1988. effect of induction of hypothermia after acute
286. Sakai H, Sheng H, Yates RB, et al: Isoflurane pro- 305. Nebauer AE, Doenicke A, Hoernecke R, et al: brain injury. N Engl J Med 344:556-563, 2001.
vides long-term protection against focal cerebral Does etomidate cause haemolysis? Br J Anaesth 326. Kammersgaard LP, Rasmussen BH, Jorgensen
ischemia in the rat. Anesthesiology 106:92-99; 69:58-60, 1992. HS, et al: Feasibility and safety of inducing
discussion 8-10, 2007. 306. Pickard JD, Murray GD, Illingworth R, et al: modest hypothermia in awake patients with acute
287. Warner DS, McFarlane C, Todd MM, et al: Sevo- Effect of oral nimodipine on cerebral infarction stroke through surface cooling: A case-control
flurane and halothane reduce focal ischemic brain and outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage: study. Stroke 31:2251-2256, 2000.
damage in the rat. Anesthesiology 79:985-992, British Aneurysm Nimodipine Trial. BMJ 327. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, et al: Treatment
1993. 298:636-642, 1989. of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac
288. Werner C, Mollenberg O, Kochs E, et al: Sevoflu- 307. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med
rane improves neurological outcome after incom- trial of nimodipine in acute stroke. Trust Study 346:557-563, 2002.
plete cerebral ischaemia in rats. Br J Anaesth Group. Lancet 336:1205-1209, 1990. 328. Wass CT, Lanier WL, Hofer RE, et al: Tempera-
75:756-760, 1995. 308. Drummond J, Oh Y-S, Cole D, et al: Phenyle- ture changes of > or = 1 degree C alter functional
289. Engelhard K, Werner C, Reeker W, et al: Desflu- phrine-induced hypertension decreases the area neurologic outcome and histopathology in a
rane and isoflurane improve neurological of ischemia following middle cerebral artery canine model of complete cerebral ischemia.
outcome after incomplete cerebral ischaemia in occlusion in the rat. Stroke 20:1538-1544, 1989. Anesthesiology 83:325-335, 1995.
rats. Br J Anaesth 83:415-421, 1999. 309. Wise G, Sutter R, Burkholder J: The treatment of 329. Vannucci RC, Brucklacher RM, Vannucci SJ: The
290. Wilhelm S, Ma D, Maze M, et al: Effects of xenon brain ischemia with vasopressor drugs. Stroke effect of hyperglycemia on cerebral metabolism
on in vitro and in vivo models of neuronal injury. 3:135-140, 1972. during hypoxia-ischemia in the immature rat. J
Anesthesiology 96:1485-1491, 2002. 310. Young WL, Solomon RA, Pedley TA, et al: Direct Cereb Blood Flow Metab 16:1026-1033, 1996.
291. Homi HM, Yokoo N, Ma D, et al: The neuropro- cortical EEG monitoring during temporary 330. Mullner M, Sterz F, Binder M, et al: Blood glucose
tective effect of xenon administration during vascular occlusion for cerebral aneurysm surgery. concentration after cardiopulmonary resuscita-
transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in Anesthesiology 71:794-799, 1989. tion influences functional neurological recovery
mice. Anesthesiology 99:876-881, 2003. 311. Ahmed N, Nasman P, Wahlgren NG: Effect of in human cardiac arrest survivors. J Cereb Blood
292. Ma D, Yang H, Lynch J, et al: Xenon attenuates intravenous nimodipine on blood pressure and Flow Metab 17:430-436, 1997.
cardiopulmonary bypass-induced neurologic and outcome after acute stroke. Stroke 31:1250-1255, 331. Weir CJ, Murray GD, Dyker AG, et al: Is hyper-
neurocognitive dysfunction in the rat. Anesthesi- 2000. glycaemia an independent predictor of poor
ology 98:690-698, 2003. 312. Rose JC, Mayer SA: Optimizing blood pressure in outcome after acute stroke? Results of a long-term
293. Ma D, Hossain M, Chow A, et al: Xenon and hypo- neurological emergencies. Neurocrit Care 1:287- follow up study. BMJ 314:1303-1306, 1997.
thermia combine to provide neuroprotection from 299, 2004. 332. Matchar DB, Divine GW, Heyman A, et al: The
neonatal asphyxia. Ann Neurol 58:182-193, 2005. 313. Artru AA, Merriman HG: Hypocapnia added to influence of hyperglycemia on outcome of
294. Ma D, Hossain M, Rajakumaraswamy N, et al: hypertension to reverse EEG changes during cerebral infarction. Ann Intern Med 117:449-456,
Combination of xenon and isoflurane produces a carotid endarterectomy. Anesthesiology 70:1016- 1992.
synergistic protective effect against oxygen-glu- 1018, 1989. 333. Bruno A, Levine SR, Frankel MR, et al: Admis-
cose deprivation injury in a neuronal-glial co- 314. Waltz AG, Sundt TM Jr, Michenfelder JD: Cere- sion glucose level and clinical outcomes in the A
II 364

NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial. Neurology 59:669- 343. Strandgaard S: Autoregulation of cerebral blood ing regional blood volume during graded hypoxic
674, 2002. flow in hypertensive patients. The modifying hypoxia. Br J Cancer 91:374-380, 2004.
334. Gray CS, Hildreth AJ, Sandercock PA, et al: Glu- influence of prolonged antihypertensive treat- 352. Packard SD, Mandeville JB, Ichikawa T, et al:
cose-potassium-insulin infusions in the manage- ment on the tolerance to acute, drug-induced Functional response of tumor vasculature to
ment of post-stroke hyperglycaemia: the UK hypotension. Circulation 53:720-727, 1976. Paco2: Determination of total and microvascular
Glucose Insulin in Stroke Trial (GISTUK). 344. Finnerty FA Jr, Witkin L, Fazekas JF: Cerebral blood volume by MRI. Neoplasia 5:330-338,
Lancet Neurol 6:397-406, 2007. hemodynamics during cerebral ischemia induced 2003.
335. Auer RN: Hypoglycemic brain damage. Metab by acute hypotension. J Clin Invest 33:1227-1232, 353. Schregel W, Geissler C, Winking M, et al: Tran-
Brain Dis 19:169-175, 2004. 1954. scranial Doppler monitoring during induction of
336. Archer DP: The role of bloodletting in the preven- 345. Njemanze PC: Critical limits of pressure-flow anesthesia: Effects of propofol, thiopental, and
tion and treatment of asthenic apoplexy. J Neuro- relation in the human brain. Stroke 23:1743-1747, hyperventilation in patients with large malignant
surg Anesthesiol 6:51-53, 1994. 1992. brain tumors. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 5:86-93,
337. Lenzi GL, Frackowiak RS, Jones T: Cerebral 346. Vorstrup S, Barry DI, Jarden JO, et al: Chronic 1993.
oxygen metabolism and blood flow in human antihypertensive treatment in the rat reverses 354. Shin JH, Lee HK, Kwun BD, et al: Using relative
cerebral ischemic infarction. J Cereb Blood Flow hypertension-induced changes in cerebral blood cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the
Metab 2:321-335, 1982. flow autoregulation. Stroke 15:312-318, 1984. histopathologic grade of cerebral gliomas: pre-
338. Paulson OB: Regional cerebral blood flow in apo- 347. Toyoda K, Fujii K, Ibayashi S, et al: Attenuation liminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:783-
plexy due to occlusion of the middle cerebral and recovery of brain stem autoregulation in 789, 2002.
artery. Neurology 20:63-77, 1970. spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Cereb Blood 355. Bedford RF, Morris L, Jane JA: Intracranial hyper-
339. Agnoli A, Fieschi C, Bozzao L, et al: Autoregula- Flow Metab 18:305-310, 1998. tension during surgery for supratentorial tumor:
tion of cerebral blood flow. Studies during drug- 348. Larsen FS, Olsen KS, Hansen BA, et al: Transcra- Correlation with preoperative computed tomog-
induced hypertension in normal subjects and in nial Doppler is valid for determination of the raphy scans. Anesth Analg 61:430-433, 1982.
patients with cerebral vascular diseases. Circula- lower limit of cerebral blood flow autoregulation. 356. Kaal EC, Vecht CJ: The management of brain
tion 38:800-812, 1968. Stroke 25:1985-1988, 1994. edema in brain tumors. Curr Opin Oncol 16:593-
340. Fieschi C, Agnoli A, Prencipe M, et al: Impair- 349. Waldemar G, Schmidt JF, Andersen AR, et al: 600, 2004.
ment of the regional vasomotor response of cer- Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and 357. Stummer W: Mechanisms of tumor-related brain
ebral vessels to hypercarbia in vascular diseases. cerebral blood flow autoregulation in normoten- edema. Neurosurg Focus 22:E8, 2007.
Eur Neurol 2:13-30, 1969. sive and hypertensive man. J Hypertens 7:229- 358. Shapiro WR, Hiesiger EM, Cooney GA, et al:
341. Olsen TS: Regional cerebral blood flow after 235, 1989. Temporal effects of dexamethasone on blood-to-
occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Acta 350. Arbit E, DiResta GR, Bedford RF, et al: Intraop- brain and blood-to-tumor transport of 14C-alpha-
Neurol Scand 73:321-337, 1986. erative measurement of cerebral and tumor blood amino isobutyric acid in rat C6 glioma. J
342. Ballotta E, Da Giau G, Baracchini C, et al: Early flow with laser-Doppler flowmetry. Neurosurgery Neurooncol 8:197-204, 1990.
versus delayed carotid endarterectomy after 24:166-170, 1989. 359. Wasterlain CG: Mortality and morbidity from
a non-disabling ischemic stroke: A prospective, 351. Julien C, Payen JF, Tropres I, et al: Assessment of serial seizures. An experimental study. Epilepsia
randomized study. Surgery 131:287-293, 2002. vascular reactivity in rat brain glioma by measur- 15:155-176, 1974.

A
J. A. Jeevendra Martyn
.. , .. , ..
.. , ..

-
14


1. - () ,
, .
4. , ,
. ,
, , ,
,
. . ,
,
, ,
, .

. (), ,
- .
. ,
, .
,
5.
-

.
,
2. ,
, , ,
, .
,
- ,
.

. , .
,
6. -
-
.
,
,
, ,
,
,

,

,
.
.
7. ,
3.
(,
.
),

.
,
,
,
(Clostridium tetanus, Clostridium
,
botulinum),
.

,
.

, 12
.
, ,
,
,
,

365
II 366

.
,

, .
. 9.
8.
. e 7
, ,
. .

. ,
(, .
, , , , ,
) -
, ,
. .

, 7 ,
, , , .
. 10. , -
,
.
.
( .
) (7)

- - , :
, , -
9-11.
(). -
- -
. - , -
-
, .
-
. , -
-
, ,
- ,
1-3. , , -
gravis - -
( in vivo12.
)4 , , - , -
3. - , 13,14.
:
, -
,
3,5. , ,
- 14-
17
. .
, , ,
- . -
6. ,
- , .
- 7, , -
, 15-19.
8.
-
.
- -
- ,
, -
A .
- 367 14
,
, - . -
. - (,
, , ), -
, .
. , , -
, --

II
, (, , ),
,
. .

, ,
, 17. - ( )
.
-
,
. ,
, ,
( , - -
), - -
, 12-17. -
.
, - -
, .
, , (. 14 1). , -
. , -
(NDMRs) , - ,
(. . 14 1). -


. 14-1 -
, :
(.. -
),
. A,
A B
, ,

,

. ,

(). ,
,
-
. D, , -
, C
, -
,
,
,
, ,
.

,

. -

, -

-
. -


.
,
,
-


- Na+

D A
II 368

. , -
, , ; ,
, , , -
. - .
-
(. . 14 1). . -
20 , ,
- , .
. - ,
(), , -
. - , -
22.
. , -
, . -
- -
. ,
. - - .
, , , -
, ,
. -
12. - 23.

.
, 5 . (. . 14 1D).
, -
-
(. 14 1D). (.. ),
,
- , , -
- . - .
,
17,24. -
17,19.
. - , -
, , - . , (..
, . - ) -
, ,
. - (.
, - -
, , - ). -
. 4,5
. - (, )25,26. , , -

, -
. -
1-3,27.
, ,
,
- , -
(, ),
. -
. . . 14-1 14-2, -
. - , , ,
-
- , . , -
- , (),
. , , , , -
- - - , -
, , - .
, -
20,21. ,
, - , ( ),
, -
(. -
), (. -
A 20. - ). ,
- 369 14
, - ,
, - , -
. . -
- , , -
, ,
, - . ,
28,29. , ,

II
(200 ), , - . -
- ,
. - -
, , , 26 34.
, 12
,
-
30. -
, , -
,
30.
- -
,
--
.
,
- -
. , ,
- . ,
, ,
. , , -
- ,
(). ,

(. 14-2)19,31,33.
. , , ,
- ,
, , - ,
, , - . -
( - -
). ;
- ,
, .
. -
,
, -
- ,
,
-
28,29.
- ,
, -
. -
17,28. . , -
- ,
-
, .
,
, -, - , . -
15,31-33. 2 -
,
. - 16 35. -
,
, , 200 ,
, 5000 , -
, , . ,
500000 . ( , Na+ ,
2+) (- --
), - A
II 370

13,38. -
31,36. (.
. 14-2). P-
(, 4 , - ,
), . , -
. , ,
, - --
25,37. - .
- ,
, , , -
, 25,31.
, -
, . . ,
, gravis,
, , ,
. --
- 39.
,
,
. - -
, .
.
- 3,4,31.
, 15,25. -
(, , , -
: P- L-. P ) P--
, , - .
, -

Na+

K+

CoA



()

Ca2+ ()
,

. 14-2 , , , .
. ()
( CoA), , , . -
( Ca2+), -
. .
. , .
() , . ,
. C . ,
, . (- [] ) -
A N- (), -
(. . 14-3)
- 371 14
- ,
. P-, ,
, (- (,
, ). ).
L-, -
- . , ,
L, - L-, - -

II
, - , , -
,
. , - .
- ,
, - , , -
. .
,
. , :
-
L-. . -
, ,
, 13,29,38.

, -
,
, , - ,
VP2 VP140,41. .

, . -
. ,
. - . .
, SNARE
(VP1) - - -
, - 25 (SNAP-
, (- 25)42. -
), 40-42. . -
SNAP-25 , -
-, - .

SNARE40-42. SNARE ( N-- SNAP-25.
) - C , -
, - ,
. () -
(.. ,
), , . -
, , 44.
,
(. )43. (.. -
- ), (.
, - 14-3).
. - .
, , , -
, , ,
, - -
41. 42,44.
,
, -
( ). ,
(- ( ..)40,41.
). - -
, SNARE-,
( )41. 45,46. -
(VP1) .
, -
, .
, (- ), - -
40-42, - ,
, 47,48. - A
II 372




SNARE






SNARE
SNAP-25


A B C D E F



. 14-3 - . ,
, SNAP-25. C - , .
(.. - []) . , -
/ SNAP-25. -
, . ,
.
. ,
. (L) (HC) . D,
. E, . L- -
SNARE , , , ,

, . -
. ( 3.1.1.7)
, - B.
, , -
, , - 13,17. -
. ,
- -
SNARE- (. 14-4). . ,
-
, Clostridium . -
botulinum. - ,
, - . -
, - ,
- 49. , -
, 1
. .
, -
50. -
.

51. ,
-
, , - ,
, , - , gravis -
52,53. -
, . - -
, - 31.
, , -
- ,
. , - , -
, (, ) -
A12 , , -
A . - 54,55.
- 373 14
. 14-4. -
- 250000 .
, - . , ,
. , (, -
) , , . -
-
. 7-

II
7-.
400-500 -
.

Torpedo . -
. -,
, -
- . -
, ,
COS , , ( -)
. , - 192-193 -60.
-
- - ,
189-199 -61. -
. 1 (NR 1), ,
, , -
, (ARIA)-, -
56-59. ErbB62.
-
: , -
()
7-
(.
)1-3. -
-
. , -
- .
63, -
43- , . ,
,
1:131. , -63.
-
2. - ,

()

()



7
(-) 7 7
7 7
7

. 14-4 () ( ) ( ). ,
, - -, - -. ,
- -, - -. , 7-,
. . , -, -
. , -,
. - - .
, 7-A .
, - ,

A
II 374

, (NR-1 . -
NR-2), , ,
62. , ,
, .
- (), - , -
. ,
, . , -
, ,
. , .
( ..), . 14-5 -
, -
, ErbB-, . , -
(. 14-5). (.. )
().
, -,
( ),
. , ,
.
19. , -
- ,
, .
. ,
,
- , , - (, ). ,
, -, - ,
. ,
, , NR-1, - .
ARIA (), - -
ErbB , -, 44,62-65. -
(. . 14-4).
-
, . ,
,
, ( 104 /).
,
500000 -
- ,

. Patch-clamping . -
, -
- ,
, .

Ca++ K+

Na+

A B C D
. 14-5 ( , Chondodendron Strychnos) -
. , . B, (-
) . ,
( ), , . D, ,
( ). .
. ,
A . , ,

- 375 14
, -
, .
- , -
, ,
- ,
, . -
, . -,

II
- . ,
. . -
, - , -
, (). ; ,
- -
-, .
, - -
(. . 14-5). , -
, -
. , . -
- , -
, - ,
, ,
.
.
, , -
- , -

(. . ,
). , ,
- . -
66-68:
, , -
. . ,

, ; -
, , - , .
,
.
, - .
, , , -
, - . ,
68.
. -
. -
. ,
,
,
. , -
,
, -
. -
-
,


.
, -
, , -
.

, -
. -
(.. ) , -
, , -
. . 14-5 - ,
- , -
. .
, , - A
II 376

, .
, , , (..
. ) , (..
(decamethonium) , - - ) ,
, , .

. , -
, ; , ,
1 . ( ) ,
- . --
- , , -

, - , ,
. , - . ,
, - ,
, - -
, . ,
. - . -
, , --
, - ,
. ,
, - . -
, , -
. - . -
, , ,
. ,
- , .
, - , -
, - ,
. - ,
- , ,
, - ,
, , . , --
. , , -
- , .
, - ,
, , . ,
, ,
. - , --
- ,
, , , .
69. ,
. , -
- .
, , -
. ,
, .
, ,
(. 14-6).
. ,
: ,
;
Na+ ,
, -
,
. -
-
,
.
. ,
,
. 14-6 . ,
. - ,
-, .
. - . -
A , ,
( ). . ,
- 377 14
. -
20,21. - (..
, ).
20. - , . -
- , ,
, . 1000
,

II
. , , -
, .
, -
(. )
21. - . -
- ,
7-, . , -
.
,
-
74,75.
, (, -
) , -
-
, , , -
, - .
. - , ,
,
,
14-1 ,
. -

, :
,
. -

, .

,
.
. , ,
, -

70,71. -
, ,
-
.
, -


. -



:

. ,

.




-
() -
68-73.
,
, .
,
--
, -
,
.
.
, ,
, A
II 378

, , .
. -
, , -
, - ,
, .
. - -
,
-
. -
, .
. -
- , ,
- .
. , , -
, -
2- (. II 76.
). - - -
, , -
, : , ,
, - , , ,
. , . , -
, -
, ,
. .
, ,
. 14-1, , -
, .,
, , -
, ,
. -
, - . , ,
.
, , , - , .
- -
. -
. -
. ,
, - , , -
. - , -
, , . -
- ,
.
, .




,
-
, -- . -
, . -
. , ,
-
.

. .
: 76,77. + Na+ .
- , -
, - -
, . ,
. , , -
. - . -
, .
. -
- - ,
A , , , -
- 379 14
. , ,
, . -
, , - -
78. -
2- (. 14-7).
, - , -
, , , 1, 1, , -/- , -

II
( ). , 7--
, 80,81.
, . -
.
, 2-

. 2-
, -
, - A
.

7 7 7

7 7
7
7 7 7 a7
7
7
7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7

7 7

7

B


7 7
7 7 7
7 7

g
-
7
. , , - 7 7 7
7
, 7
-
, . C

, ,
.





,
, ,
,
, , -
1-3. , - D

, 79.
- 7g 7 e
7 7 7
- 7 7
(
7
7
7 7 7
, ). 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7
7
7
52,53.
, E
1-3,31.
. 14-7 ,
(. . 14-4). - . ,
, - , ,
-, , - . . , --
7-, -
, - . C,
-. - - - ,
, . D, -
- , - -
7- . , -
. . E,
(- ,
), , (, , , ,
, ) -
7- . -
. -
, -
(, , )
A
II 380

( , ASA 2007) . -
, 7-,
(-) 7- -
. 7- - ,
(.. ) .
(. . 14-4). ,
( )
-

7-. ( )

7-.82,83 ( , ,
), , - . ,
, , -, . , -
7-81-83. , (, ,
7- - , ),
(1, 1, , /) -
7- . , 19,31. -
,
- .
, -
7 . .. , 7- .
7 , - .
81. , - , -
7- - (. . 14-7). -
81,
( 145 / ) - ,
( 4,5 /), , -
. - GI - .
( ) , -
, 7-. 7- .
7- ( -
) ,
, -
7-. 7- -

83, 7- (
81). 7- ErbB
,
, -.

- 7-,
(1, 1, , /)81. -
()
- -
. -
, --
. 7-,
,
(,
) - -
, .

7- -

, 2.
7-

, -
-
- .
. 14-8 , - () -
(- -- - . -
) , - ,
.
7- . ,
,
, . , (--
, , ), ,
, 7- (), -
83. , , . /
A , 7-
- -
()
- 381 14
, -
. - -
7-
.
, ,
- -
(. 14-8)62-65. - (, ,

II
, , ,
, , -
, - ).
7- 84-86.
- . ,
7-1-3.
16,17.
- ,
. - ,

- ,
. - (. . 14-7). -
- ,
15,27,33. , .

. , , -
, -
, .
- -
. . 7-
- - ,
. .
2 15, - (-
. 7- - -) -
. (),
1,33. -
; - , -
2 ,
,
. - 24 . -
- , 2-10
. - ,
, , (. . 14-4). -
- , - \
.
. , -
2- 27. , -
, - - - , -
- , , ,
. - 2.
, , ,
,
: , / , , -
62-65. - 1,3.
, ,
, 7- -
. .-

, -
-65. - , -
7. -
, -
. , ,
, -
(. . 14-8). 68.
.
, -
, -
. (, A
II 382

). .
24 72 -
. - , ,
- . -
1-3. , , -
(), (, )
. , (, -
, ) -
- , ,
, -
. - 6.
, -
. , - ,
-
, - -, -
-. -

1. -
-
, -
. , 82,88. , ,
- -
, , -
, .
, -
87. , -
89,90.
d-
-
. -

. , -
, , -
6,88. - , -
, - ,
, . .
-
, , ,
14. - .
, - ,
(). .16
. , -
- ( 1 10), , 12 (2 10 2 4).-
- (-1 -4) -, - -- , , -
. -, - - -, - - ,
. , - -. -
- - ,
- - . 1- 7-.-
, ,
1-,
, - , 2 10.
. - ,
- Nn Nm.
. ,
. , -
.
, - .
, in vitro ,
-
. (- 89,90.
), , -
. -
, , ,
- -
, , - .
A , -
- 383 14
, ,
,
. , train-
of-four fade , -
, - -
- :
58,59. , -

II
- -95,96.
, -
, 3290-93. , - 4 . -
32 ;
- , -
. - -
- .
. 34 ,
59. , , -
-
- , -
94. .
, -
9. , , -
, ,
, , , , . 4--
, - ,
, , , , -
. , -
. .
, ,

.
- , -
. -

.
-
(, , ,
- )
, , 95. -
. - -
-
. -
, - . -
. ,
- (.. ,
- , - ). ,
. , -
, -
. , -
500 . 5 -
, - . -

. , - ,
, - .
.
, .
. - , -
, -
1 , - , ,
. - ,
, .
, - , -
.
, , . ,
, - -
, -
. , A
II 384

-
- ,
. . -
. ,

gravis -
-- . , -
54,55. ,
- , -
- . -
- . -
, - -
, , -
.- , -
- 54,55. ,
, ,
- .
, , - . --
76,77.
, , -
, , .
-
. - -
, , . ,
, - , -
, , -
. , ,
, , -, -
- . (, ,
, , - ) ,
. - 1891.
, - ORG25969 () -
-
, , .
- . -
, - -
-
. (.. ).


1. Martyn JAJ, Fukushima Y, Chon JY, Yang S: Up- 497:173, 2004. 19. Song Y, Panzer JA, Wyatt RM, BaliceGordon RJ:
and-down regulation of skeletal muscle acetylcho- 10. Jooste E, Zhang Y, Emala CW: Neuromuscular Formation and plasticity of neuromuscular synap-
line receptors. Intl Anesthesiol Clin 44:123, 2006. blocking agents differential bronchoconstrictive tic connections. Int Anesthesiol Clin 44:145, 2006.
2. Martyn JAJ, Richtsfeld M: Succinylcholine-induced potential in Guinea pig airways. Anesthesiology 20. Fraterman S, Khurana TS, Rubinstein NA: Identifi-
hyperkalemia in acquired pathologic states: Etio- 106:763, 2007. cation of acetylcholine receptor subunits differen-
logic factors and molecular mechanisms. Anesthe- 11. Fryer AD, Maclagan J: Pancuronium and gallamine tially expressed in singly and multiply innervated
siology 104:158, 2006. are antagonists for pre- and post-junctional mus- fibers of extraocular muscles. Invest Ophthalmol
3. Martyn JAJ, White DA, Gronert GA, et al: Up-and carinic receptors in the guinea-pig lung. Naunyn Vis Sci 47:3828, 2006.
down-regulation of skeletal muscle acetylcholine Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 335:367, 1987. 21. ButtnerEnnever JA, Horn AK: Oculomotor
receptors. Anesthesiology 26:872, 1992. 12. Lichtman JW, Conchello JA: Fluorescence micros- system: A dual innervation of the eye muscles from
4. ContiFine BM, Milani M, Kaminski HJ: Myasthe- copy. Nat Methods 2:910, 2005. the abducens, trochlear, and oculomotor nuclei.
nia gravis: Past, present, and future. J Clin Invest 13. Kelly RB: The cell biology of the nerve terminal. Mov Disord 2:S2, 2002.
116:2843, 2006. Neuron 1:431, 1988. 22. Durant NN, Katz RL: Suxamethonium. Br J
5. Vincent A, Dalton P, Clover L, et al: Antibodies to 14. Kalamida D, Poulas K, Avramopoulou V, et al: Anaesth 54:195, 1982.
neuronal targets in neurological and psychiatric Muscle and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine recep- 23. Vachon CA, Warner DO, Bacon DR: Succinylcho-
diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci 992:48, 2003. tors: Structure, function and pathogenicity. FEBS line and the open globe. Tracing the teaching.
6. Johnson WC, Prior C, Marshall IG: Presynaptic Lett 274:3799, 2007. Anesthesiology 99:220, 2003.
receptors in the neuromuscular junction. Ann N Y 15. Sanes JR, Lichtman JW: Induction, assembly, matu- 24. Betz WJ, Caldwell JH, Kinnamon SC: Increased
Acad Sci 604:69, 1990. ration and maintenance of a postsynaptic appara- sodium conductance in the synaptic region of rat skel-
7. Fletcher GH, Steinbach JH: Ability of depolarizing tus. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:791, 2001. etal muscle fibers. J Physiol (Lond) 352:189, 1984.
neuromuscular blocking drugs to act as partial 16. Bruneau EG, Akaaboune M: The dynamics of recy- 25. Engel AG: The therapy of congenital myasthenic
agonists at fetal and adult mouse muscle nicotinic cled acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular syndromes. Neurotherapeutics 4:252, 2007.
receptors. Mol Pharmacol 49:938, 1996. junction in vivo. Development 133:4485, 2006. 26. Yu FH, Catterall WA: Overview of the voltage-gated
8. Paul M, Kindler CH, Fokt RM, et al: Isobolo- 17. CohenCory S: The developing synapse: Construc- sodium channel family. Genome Biol 4:207, 2003.
graphic analysis of non-depolarising muscle relax- tion and modulation of synaptic structures and 27. Goudsouzian NG, Standaert FG: The infant and the
ant interactions at their receptor site. Eur J circuits. Science 298:770, 2002. myoneural junction. Anesth Analg 65:1208, 1986.
Pharmacol 438:35, 2002. 18. Aldunate R, Casar JC, Brandan E, Inestrosa NC: 28. Heuser JE, Reese TS: Structural changes after trans-
9. Jonsson M, Wyon N, Lindahl SGE: Neuromuscular Structural and functional organization of synaptic mitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction.
blocking agents block carotid body neuronal nico- acetylcholinesterase. Brain Res Brain Res Rev J Cell Biol 88:564, 1981.
A tinic acetylcholine receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 47:96, 2004. 29. Rash JE, Walrond JP, Morita M: Structural and
- 385 14
functional correlates of synaptic transmission in 56. Gu Y, Forsayeth JR, Verall S: Assembly of the mam- 78. Creese R, Head SD, Jenkinson DF: The role of the
the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. J Electron malian muscle acetylcholine receptor in transfected sodium pump during prolonged end-plate currents
Microsc Tech 10:153, 1988. COS cells. J Cell Biol 114:799, 1991. in guinea-pig diaphragm. J Physiol 384:377, 1987.
30. Sieburth D, Chng Q, Dybbs M, et al: Systematic 57. Kopta C, Steinbach JH: Comparison of mammalian 79. Ibebunjo C, Martyn JAJ: Thermal injury induces
analysis of genes required for synapse structure and adult and fetal nicotinic acetylcholinic receptors stably greater resistance to d-tubocurarine in local than
function. Nature 436:510, 2005. expressed in fibroblasts. J Neurosci 14:3922, 1994. in distant muscles in the rat. Anesth Analg 91:1243,
31. Naguib M, Flood P, McArdle JJ, Brenner HR: 58. Jonsson M, Gulrey D, Dabrowski M, et al: Distinct 2000.
Advances in neurobiology of the neuromuscular pharmacologic properties of neuromuscular block- 80. Fischer U, Reinhardt S, Albuquerque EX, Maelicke A:

II
junction: Implications for the anesthesiologist. ing agents on human neuronal nicotinic acetylcho- Expression of functional alpha7 nicotinic acetylcho-
Anesthesiology 96:202, 2002. line receptors: A possible explanation for the line receptor during mammalian muscle development
32. Littleton JT, Sheng M: Neurobiology: Synapses train-of-four fade. Anesthesiology 105:521, 2006. and denervation. Eur J Neurosci 11:2856, 1999.
unplugged. Nature 424:931, 2003. 59. Jonsson M, Dabrowski M, Gurley DA, et al: Activa- 81. Tsuneki H, Salas R, Dani JA: Mouse denervation
33. Hall Z, Merlie JR: Synaptic structure and develop- tion and inhibition of human muscular and neu- increases expression of alpha 7 nicotinic receptor
ment: The neuromuscular junction. Cell 72:99, ronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by with unusual pharmacology. J Physiol 547:169, 2003.
1993. succinylcholine. Anesthesiology 104:724, 2006. 82. Lindstrom JM: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors of
34. Rich MM: The control of neuromuscular transmis- 60. Pedersen SE, Cohen JB: d-Tubocurarine binding muscles and nerves: Comparison of their struc-
sion in health and disease. Neuroscientist 12:134, sites are located at alpha-gamma and alpha-delta tures, functional roles, and vulnerability to pathol-
2006. subunit interfaces of the nicotinic acetylcholine ogy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 998:41, 2003.
35. Wang X, Engisch KL, Li Y, et al: Decreased synaptic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:2785, 1990. 83. Placzek AN, Grassi F, Papke T, et al: A single point
activity shifts the calcium dependence of release at 61. Griesmann GE, McCormick DJ, De Aizpurua HJ, mutation confers properties of the muscle-type
the mammalian neuromuscular junction in vivo. J et al: -Bungarotoxin binds to human acetylcholine nicotinic acetylcholine receptor to homomeric
Neurosci 24:10687, 2004. receptor -subunit peptide 185-199. J Neurochem alpha7 receptors. Mol Pharmacol 66:169, 2004.
36. Ryan AM, Matthews E, Hanna MG: Skeletal-mus- 54:1541, 1990. 84. Hirose M, Kaneki M, Martyn JAJ, et al: Immobiliza-
cle channelopathies: Periodic paralysis and nondys- 62. Escher P, Lacazette E, Courtet M, et al: Synapses tion depresses insulin signaling in skeletal muscle.
trophic myotonias. Curr Opin Neurol 20:558, 2007. form in skeletal muscles lacking neuregulin recep- Am J Physiol 279:E1235, 2000.
37. Katz B, Miledi R: Estimates of quantal content tors. Science 308:1920, 2005. 85. Sugita H, Kaneki M, Martyn JAJ, et al: Burn injury
during chemical potentiation of transmitter 63. Gullberg D: Cell biology: The molecules that make impairs insulin-stimulated Akt/PKB activation in
release. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 215:369, 1979. muscle. Nature 424:138, 2003. skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
38. Uchitel OD, Protti DA, Sanchez V, et al: P-type 64. Missias AC, Chu GC, Klocke BJ, et al: Maturation 288:E585, 2005.
voltage dependent calcium channel mediates pre- of the acetylcholine receptor in skeletal muscle: 86. Hirose M, Kaneki M, Martyn JAJ, et al: Long-term
synaptic calcium influx and transmitter release in Regulation of the AChR -to- switch. Dev Biol denervation impairs insulin receptor substrate
mammalian synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 179:223, 1996. (IRS)-1mediated insulin signaling in skeletal
89:3330, 1992. 65. Tansey MG, Chu GC, Merlie JP: ARIA/HRG regu- muscle. Metabolism 50:216, 2001.
39. Vincent A: Immunology of disorders of neuromuscu- lates AChR epsilon subunit gene expression at the 87. Gronert GA: Cardiac arrest after succinylcholine:
lar transmission. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 183:1, neuromuscular synapse via activation of Mortality greater with rhabdomyolysis than recep-
2006. phosphatidy linositol 3-kinase and Ras/MAPK tor upregulation. Anesthesiology 94:523, 2001.
40. Sudhof TC: Synaptic vesicles: An organelle comes pathway. J Cell Biol 134:46, 1996. 88. Lukas RJ, Changeux J-P, Novre NL, et al: Interna-
of age. Cell 127:671, 2006. 66. Lukas RJ, Bencherif M: Heterogeneity and regula- tional union of pharmacology. XX. Current status
41. Rizolli SO, Betz WJ: All change at the synapse. tion of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Int Rev of the nomenclature for nicotinic acetylcholine
Nature 423:591, 2003. Neurobiol 34:25, 1992. receptors and their subunits. Pharmacol Rev
42. Lang T, Jahn R: Core proteins of the secretory 67. McCarthy MP, Stroud RM: Conformational states 51:397, 1999.
machinery. Handb Exp Pharmacol 184:107, 2008. of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from 89. Chiodini F, Charpantier E, Muller D, et al: Blockade
43. Valtorta F, Jahn R, Fesce R, et al: Synaptophysin Torpedo californica induced by the binding of and activation of the human neuronal nicotinic
(p38) at the frog neuromuscular junction: Its incor- agonist, antagonists, and local anesthetics. Equilib- acetylcholine receptors by atracurium and lauda-
poration into the axolemma and recycling after rium measurements using tritium-hydrogen nosine. Anesthesiology 94:643, 2001.
intense quantal secretion. J Cell Biol 107:2717, 1988. exchange. Biochemistry 28:40, 1989. 90. Vizi ES, Lendvai B: Side effects of nondepolarizing
44. Heidelberger R: Neuroscience: Sensors and syn- 68. Karlin A, DiPaola M, Kao PN, Lobel P: Functional muscle relaxants: Relationship to their antinico-
chronicity. Nature 450:623, 2007. sites and transient states of the nicotinic acetylcho- tinic and antimuscarinic actions. Pharmacol Ther
45. Turton K, Chaddock JA, Acharya KR: Botulinum line receptor. In Hille B, Fambrough DM (eds): 73:75, 1997.
and tetanus neurotoxins: Structure, function and Proteins of Excitable Membranes. Society of 91. Tsuneki H, Kimura I, Dezaki K, et al: Immunohis-
therapeutic utility. Trends Biochem Sci 27:552, 2002. General Physiologists. New York, Wiley Intersci- tochemical localization of neuronal nicotinic
46. Schiavo G: Structural biology: Dangerous liaisons ence, 1987, p 43. receptor subtypes at the pre- and postjunctional
on neurons. Nature 444:1019, 2006. 69. Yamaoka K, Vogel SM, Seyama I: Na+ channel phar- sites in mouse diaphragm muscle. Neurosci Lett
47. Schurch B: The role of botulinum toxin in neuro- macology and molecular mechanisms of gating. 196:13, 1995.
urology. Drugs Today (Barc) 40:205, 2004. Curr Pharm Des 12:429, 2006. 92. Faria M, Oliveira L, Timoteo MA, et al: Blockade of
48. Lowe NJ: Overview of botulinum neurotoxins. J 70. Raines DE: Anesthesia and nonanesthetic volatile neuronal facilitatory nicotinic receptors containing
Cosmet Laser Ther 9(Suppl 1):11, 2007. compounds have dissimilar activities on nicotinic alpha 3 beta 2 subunits contribute to tetanic fade in
49. Frick CG, Richtsfeld M, Martyn JAJ, et al: Long- acetylcholine receptor desensitization kinetics. the rat isolated diaphragm. Synapse 49:77, 2003.
term effects of botulinum toxin on neuromuscular Anesthesiology 84:663, 1996. 93. Martyn J, Durieux ME: Succinylcholine: New
function. Anesthesiology 106:1139, 2007. 71. Sine SM: The nicotinic receptor ligand binding insights into mechanisms of action of an old drug.
50. Lange DJ, Rubin M, Gelb DJ, et al: Distant effects domain. J Neurobiol 53:431, 2002. Anesthesiology 104:633, 2006.
of locally injected botulinum toxin: A double-blind 72. Gage PW: Ion channels and postsynaptic poten- 94. Eriksson LI: Reduced hypoxic chemosensitivity in
study of single fiber EMG changes. Muscle Nerve tials. Biophys Chem 29:951, 1988. partially paralysed man. A new property of muscle
14:672, 1991. 73. Gage PW, Hammill OP: Effects of anesthetics on relaxants? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 40:520, 1996.
51. Heeroma JH, Plomp JJ, Roubos EW, Verhage M: ion channels in synapses. Int Rev Neurophysiol 95. Taylor P: Anticholinesterase agents. In Bruton LL,
Development of the mouse neuromuscular junc- 25:3, 1981. Lazo JS, Parker KL (eds): Goodman & Gilmans
tion in the absence of regulated secretion. Neuro- 74. Swope SL, Qu Z, Huganir RL: Phosphorylation of Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 11th ed.
science 120:733, 2003. nicotinic acetylcholine receptor by protein tyrosine New York, McGraw Hill, 2006, p 201.
52. Engel AG, Ohno K, Sine SM: Congenital myas- kinases. Ann N Y Acad Sci 757:197, 1995. 96. de Boer HD, Driessen JJ, Marcus MA, et al: Rever-
thenic syndromes: Progress over the past decade. 75. Plested CP, Tang T, Spreadbury I, et al: AChR phos- sal of rocuronium-induced (1.2mg/kg) profound
Muscle Nerve 27:4, 2003. phorylation and indirect inhibition of AChR func- neuromuscular block by sugammadex: A multi-
53. Engel AG, Sine SM: Current understanding of con- tion in seronegative MG. Neurology 59:1682, 2002. center, dose-finding and safety study. Anesthesiol-
genital myasthenic syndromes. Curr Opin Pharma- 76. Albuquerque EX, Alkondon M, Pereira EF, et al: ogy 107:239, 2007.
col 5:308, 2005. Properties of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine 97. Richtsfeld M, Blobner M, Martyn JAJ: Chronic
54. Abraham RB, Rudick V, Weinbroum AA: Practical receptors: Pharmacologic characterization and administration of pyridostigmine leads to a myasthe-
guidelines for acute care of victims of bioterrorism: modulation of synaptic function. J Pharmacol Exp nia-like state with down-regulation of acetylcholine
Conventional injuries and concomitant nerve agent Ther 280:1117, 1997. receptors. Young Investigator Award for abstract pre-
intoxication. Anesthesiology 97:989, 2002. 77. Maelicke A, Coban T, Storch A, et al: Allosteric sented at ASCCA at the ASA Annual Meeting of the
55. Karwa M, Currie B, Kvetan V: Bioterrorism: Pre- modulation of Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine American Society of Anesthesiologists, October 2003,
paring for the impossible or the improbable. Crit receptor ion channel activity by noncompetitive ago- San Francisco.
Care Med 33:S75, 2005. nists. J Receptor Signal Transduc Res 17:11, 1997. A
Gran Hedenstierna
..
..

15


1. CO2 6. ,
,
. O2,
2. .
7.
,
80-90% .
. 8.
3. -
( )
. ().
4. 9.
, ,
- , .
. 10.
5. ,
(
() , ?)
(
. ?).


, -
.
,
, .
,
, -
. - , -
,
.
, , -
, , ,
.
,
,
.
, - -
- , . -
. 0,5-0,6,
- 16/, 12 22/.
.
- ,
- . - , -

387
II 388

. , - ) (. 15-1).
7-8/.1 , -
- .
. 100-150 - -
. , 0,3
, 30% 0,6.4 , -
; , , VDS/
VDS/VT 0,3. ( - VT, 0,7-0,8,
. 15-1.)2 , 5 /, -
7-8 20 /.
( -
). . -
, -
5 /, , .
5 /. , -- -
1. , , -
- .
, - , -
, ,
( O2), -
, , -
. - ( V & A Q& ,

V & 5 -
& A Q).
, - ,
, -
PaCO2 . . V & A Q& (-
- V & A Q& )
-
.
25 , - (. . 15-1). , , -
100-150 , - ,
( V & A Q& , 0,8-0,9. -
).3 - 30-50 / -
, PaCO2,
. .
- PaCO2
, , .
, -
( - ,

VD /VT 0,3 0,4 - 0,9


.
VA ( ) 5 (/) 5 (/)
.
VE 7,1 (/) 8,3 - 50,0 (/)

. 15-1 . ,
, ,
CO2. ,
. ; VA ; VD/V T
A ; VE ( ).
( BMJ series Respiratory Measurement.)
389 15
150 / . -
15-1
,
.1
(PAO2) -
PACO2 1 R PaCO2
PAO2 = PIO2 + PACO2 FIO2
R R . -

II
PIO2 ,
PACO2 CO2 ( CO2 , ,
PCO2), R , PaO2 -
( 0,8-1,0), FIO2 .
. VT , -

() (. ), 2,5-4
. 40/ . -
-

,
:
,
65-100 /
PACO2 . -
PAO2 = PIO2 .
R
150 /.

(V& A)
:
V& A = f ( V T V DS )

f , V T
, VDS . . -
() (. 15-2).

3-4 , , -
:
, .
V& CO2 = c V& A FACO2 ,
, .1,6
VCO2 CO2, c
, FACO2 CO2. , ,
VA /, VCO2 /, FACO2 , .
PACO2 . ., c = 0,863, , , -
: , -

. -
V& CO2 0. 863 ,
V& A = . . ,
PACO2
.
, , . -,
, -
,
,
! - .
, PaCO2 ,
- ,
, - ,
( 15-1).
, . ,
, V & A Q& , , -
O2 CO2 -
, - .
, -
,
. PaO2 PaCO2 .

(. ).
- (
, 20 ) () -
, 100 / , , - A
II 390

TLC
ERV

VC
RV
A

. 15-2 -
(),

TLC
VC
()
(). -

ERV
()
( ,
) .
RV
(),
B . -

. ;
. ( BMJ series
Respiratory Measurement.)
VC
ERV

TLC
RV

C
- -

0,5 . , -
(, ) , -
, - ,
, , - .7
.7 - 1,5-2 (. . 15-2). -
, , (,
(. 15-2). ) .
-
- ,
, - .
.
() -
, -
- ().
, 6-8 .1
-

,
. - (. . 15-2).7
() 50% 11-12 .
, , - -

A ( ).1 3-4 (. . 15-2).7
391 15
. 15-3 -
- .

. 100
( - 10 . .
)
. ,
-

II
-

(% )
(
)
50
.
-

-.
20
, -
- 2,5 . .
,
,
. :10 0 10 20 30 40
, ( . .)

()
, - -
. - . -
(), 2-2,5 .
, . , -
, . -, - , -
2
.8 - (PTP). ,
,
. -, , -
, (. 15-3).9 -
- ,
. - , -
. 15-2. , .
,
, . , , -
() . , ,
, 4-6 . -
, ,
, . , ( ,
. ).
0,2-0,3 / H2O (2-3 /).9 -
, .7 (. . 15-3), -
, - . ,
, , . ,
12 , . -
11 1 , -
. .
, ,
, , ,

.
,
, . -, - , - -
, , . 15-4 (, -
, -, - ,
- , ; .
- ).9
.
, ,
, -
- . , ,
. , , -
. - A
II 392

10 0,2 / H2O.
, -
9 , , -
.11
8

7

-
-
6
. ,
()

5
.12 -
4 , -
.
3 , , -
-
2
( ,
1 ). -
(
0 ) ,
-0,5 0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5
() .
, -
. 15-4 - , ,
. , . -
. -
-
, ,
, ,
, . , .
, ,
.
. ,
. -
, , ,
. ( . , , -
BMJ series Respiratory Measurement.) , ,
-
.12 20%
- .
.
, , , -
(. . 15-4).9 -
. -
. - , 2 ,
, .
- 1
. , - H2O//.
, 5 H2O//, ,
, - ,
. 10 H2O//.13
() ,
, - 8,0 5 H2O//
.10 1 /, 7,0 -
- 8 H2O//,
, .14
, -
. , ,
,
- , -
, - , ,
.11 , , .12
,
, -
- ,
, . ,
, , ,
. , -
, - , ,
. - ,
A (
393 15
- ,
).12 - .
,


.
, ,

II
(, - , , ,
).
, .
,
, ,
(. . 84). . , -
-
.
1 H2O//
- - 4 /,
.15 - 5% 10%
. , .17
,
, -
,
.16
, -
, . :
, ,
,
. , .
. ,
. 15-5. - ,
1 H2O// , -
, , ,
. .18 ,
, ,
, , -
5-8 H2O//
(). , - . , -, -
, . 15-5, - , , -
.
, - -
. -
. -
. .
-,
-, , -
R : . .// ,
0,5 1 4 /
(
6,0
- ).
-, -


4,0 . , -
() -
,
, . ,
2,0

V
- (. . 15-3).
, -


. 15-5
,
.
, (,
, .
. ).18 , -
, ,
(6-8 H2O//
). ;
. 15-3 ( , A
II 394

1,0 -
,
; . 15-6). -
(/)

(-
) ,
.
-
0,8 ? ,



, . -
,
. -
-
0,6 0,3,
0,3 H2O/ .
, , ,
0 1 2 3 4 5 , -
(/) .
, ,
. 15-6 , -
. , ,
. - -
,
. , -
, .
-- ,
( ,
). ( Bake B, Wood L, Murphy B, et al: Effect of .19
inspiratory flow-rate on regional distribution of inspired gas. J Appl Physiol 37:8-17, - ,
1974.)
,
.

,

0
. . 0,6
-6,5 . .
A

A
0,4
/

1 . .
B 0,2

B
VA/Q
0,0
0 0,01 0,1 1 10 100
A.
B.

. 15-7 () () ,
. 7,5 H2O - . -
,
. ,
. -
, (MIGET). -
() . , /
A (VA/Q) , ().

395 15
. -
(?).20 -
,
(), 65-70
.21 .26 , -
,
- .

II
. .
. -
, , , -
. , (. . 71).
,
, ,
, . - .

- , 45-50 , 70-
.22,23
- , .
, , . 15-8.
(, , -
- ).
0,5 . ,
/. -
, -
( , - ; .25 ,
) ,
. ()
, , -
, , - . ,
, , , -
. - . ,
,
.24 - -
, ,
0,3 /, , ,
, 4-5 /,
.
(. 15-6).
, ,
, 5

. - 4
.
()

, 3
. +
, 2
. ,
1
. ,
, - 0
(), - 0 20 40 60 80
().25 ()
, - . 15-8 (
- []) , (,
. - ) -
( ), - . , 0,7-0,8 ,
( ).
, , ,
. .
, - . ,
,
65-70 . -
.
, 45-50 !
, . . , -
, ,
(. 15-7). 30- (.
,
). -

A
II 396

Ppl: 0,4


Palv: 1,0

Paw: 0,4 0

Pst: 0,6
Ppl: 0,4

Ppl: 2,0


Palv: 2,6

Paw: 2,0 0

Pst: 0,6 Ppl: 2,0

. 15-9 () . ,
. (Ppl) , 4
H2O (0,4 ). (Pst) (6 H2O) , ,
(Palv) (10 H2O). . , ,
(Paw) 6 H2O, , -
. ().
, , . B, ,
. . ,
, (Ppl = 20 H2O). (Pst) ,
, , . , ,
, . ,
, , .
(Pst)
,

, -
. ,
, , ,
. - .
, - , -
,
-
. .
, , ,
( . (
), , ) -
.
. , , .
,
. , -
, , . (
, )
. , -
, .
.27 , , -
A , .
397 15
, ( , (4) (5) -
), , .31
(. 15-9). , .
- . ,
, .
, , .
, ,

II
.28
. , -
. -
,
-
, -

14 .
. - , ,
- (CO), -
(0,3%) , -
. 15 23 ,
, 10 ,
2,5 2 70 2 14 , . -
, 23
0,8 2.29 .
140 2. , .
. - ,
0,7 /, (), .
0,001 /. , -
O2 CO2 . , ,
, O2 CO2 . ( )
- ,
, . .
,
. -
, , , ,
. -
, CO2
. . -

,
CO2 Hughes Bates.32
, . ,
. -
, . , O2
(CO2) , .
, -
. , .
, - . -
. , O2 CO2
, , .
, , ,
PO2 40 . . (5,3 ), PO2
. 100 . . (13,3 ),
- 60 . . (8 ).
, (-
, - CO2),
.30 ,
, -
- (. 15-10). -

, 25-30% -
. - ,
, . - , .
, ,
, (1) - , ,
, , (2) , -
, (3) ; A
II 398

( ; O2 CO2. -
PO2 ). -
- 30 . .
, ,
. . ,
, - ,
, , ( ) -
. .34 -
1,36 ( ,
1,34 1,39). , 1 ,
150 / 204 .
. -
, 98%, 200
, . , , , -
3 1 .
PaO2 100 . . (13,3 ). ,
, , , .
, -
- , , . ,
. , -
. , -
. Permut, Wes, Hughes (-
- . 35 ),
. , , ,
. - ,
.36
32. ,
44, .
. -
,
CO2 , O2, -
. -
. ,
. . -
. CO2 30 1 . ./
, , 20 (0,74 . ./ -
( - ,
).31 , - 1,0 1,04). -
, ,
CO2. PAO2
100


PaO2 ( . .)

-
,
.
20
. ., 8 . ., 40
6-10 .
-

, . 15-10

.
- .
. , - ,
.
,
-
. . -
, .
-
. -
-
, , .
,
.33 , - .
,
A
, ,

399 15
-
11-15 . ., ,
. , , ,
. IV.35
.
12 . ., - , -
-

II
. , , .
, , - , ,
, - -
, .
.
, I, -
, West . -
( West, . 15-11).35 ,
,
, ( ),
- , -
. - .37

, -
.
,
. , , -
,
- -
- .36
, ,
II. - . -
. , , -
, , -
, , , ,
(. 15-12).
. III. , -
III .38 ,
(
, - ) , , -
, ,
. , - . ,
, -
II. - ,
.39 , , -
, - , -
.35

PPA - PLA
() =
QT
( III)
. 15-11
. I, II, III, IV .
, I , -
,
. II -
,
Palv > Ppa > Pla
, , , .
I
-
. , III
,
Ppa > Palv > Pla .
II
. -
,
,
. -
. QT ;
III Ppa > Pla > Palv Palv ; Pla
; Ppa

IV Ppa > Pla > Palv


A
II 400

-
. -
.45 -
,
, ,
, , ,
.40 , .32


.
-
. - , -
() , -
,
.
.41 , , -
. , - , CO2. -
, , CO2,
- , ,
(SPECT), , -
, .
. -
- : , -
. (V & A Q& ),
- , - .
, ,
V& A Q& ,
. (. 15-1 15-2).


() - ,
, - , , CO2 -
. , ,
- . , -
, - PaCO2 45 . . (6 ),
PO2. PO2 . ,
.42,43 , -
, - ,
; , -
. , , .
, PCO2
, 8% . PAO2
4% O2 (FIO2
1,0) 52% 40% , 15-1, -
30% , . ,
.44 PAO2 :


2,0 2,0

1,6 1,6

1,2 1,2

0,8 0,8

0,4 0,4
6

0,0 0,0
A B

. 15-12 , ,
(). , . , -
, .
A . , ,
(B). (Glenny RW, Lamm WJE, Albert RK, etal: Gravity is a minor determinant of pulmonary blood-flow distribution. J Appl Physiol 71:620-629, 1991.)
401 15
. 15-1 . 15-2

PaO2 ( -
) VA/Q
PaO2
PaO2 (+) ++
( ( (
) ) ) PaO2

II
+ ++ +++
-
++

++ + +
-
VA/Q + ++

++
+ + ++

++ +
+ +++

-

-

,
PAO2 = PIO2 (1.25 PACO2 ) 15-13 ( -
1,25 - , . 15-11).
0,8, -
. , PACO2 -
PaCO2. , PIO2, 149 . . V & A Q&
(19,9 ), PaCO2 40 . . (5,3 ) PAO2 . , -
99 . . (13,2 ), PaCO2 60 (MIGET).46 ,
. . (8 ) PAO2 74 . . (9,9 ). MIGET
- ( )
PaO2, .
.
, .
PaO2. -
PAO2 (, ).
, . -
, PaO2, , (, ), -
PIO2 (,
, - (, ). , -
CO2). -
,
- .

.
. , -
. ,
, .
- 5-- ,
3
10 . ,
V & A Q& 1,0 - V& A Q& . . 15-13 , -
, , .
& A Q& 0,5 5,0 -
V , -

. 15-3 (SD) - - (n=45),



&
Q & &
V
log SDQ log SDV& (% Qt) (% Vt) PaO2/FiO2* ()

0,76 (0,33) 0,68 (0,28) 1,11 (0,52) 0,52 (0,15) 0,5 (1,0) 34,8 (14,2) 59,5 (8,1)

0,65 (0,34) 1,04 (0,36) 1,38 (0,76) 0,76 (0,31) 4,8 (4,1) 35,0 (9,9) 50,9 (15,2)
*FiO2 ( ): 0,21, 0,42
logSDQ& ; log SDV&
; Q ; V
A
II 402

, , (PAO2-PaO2).
, - V & A Q&
V & A Q& , . MIGET - ,
.47 , ,
- , - , , ,
. - -
- , MIGET. ,
.
, - , (. 15-14,
, . 15-3. ).

V &
& A Q. MIGET -
- -
, . - V & 48
& A Q.
, -
( V &
& A Q). V & A Q& (. 15-14,
V & A Q& , ).
- , -
. - (, , )
,
; .
V & A Q& 0,5 1,0,
. . , ,
, PaO2 PAO2 , -
(PAO2-PaO2) 3 5 . . V & A Q& .
(0,4-0,7 ).
.
-
VA/Q > 1
,
V & A Q& .
, -
Q

, -
.
VA/Q = 1 V &
& A Q.
, V & A Q&
5,
V & A Q& 100 ,
V
.

VA/Q < 1

A . V & A Q& , -
0,6 , ..
VA ( -
Q
). , -

0,4 15-2

/

FE
FE V T = FA ( V T V DS ) + (FI V DS )
VT
0,2 FI
FA
V T-V D
V DS FA FE
=
V T FA FI
0 VA/Q
Fi = 0, F P, PA Pa,
B 0,01 0,1 1 10 100 CO2,
. 15-13 V DS PaCO2 P ECO2
& (Q& ) () --
(V) =
& ) (). - VT PaCO2
(V& A Q

. V& A Q& 1, - FE, Fi FA ,
. - , V T, VDS VA
,
& 1, -
V& A Q ,
V& A Q &
A 1

403 15

0,8 1,2
VA VA
Q 1,0 Q
0,6
0,8

II
/

/
0,4 0,6

0,4
0,2
0,2
QS/QT = 0,6%
0,0 0,0
0,01 0,1 1 10 100 0,01 0,1 1 10 100
VA/Q VA/Q


0,6 0,6
VA VA
0,5 Q 0,5 Q

0,4 0,4
/

QS/QT = 9,3%
0,3 0,3

0,2 0,2

0,1 0,1
QS/QT = 0,4%
0,0 0,0
0,01 0,1 1 10 100 0,01 0,1 1 10 100
VA/Q VA/Q

. 15-14 ( ), ( ),
( ) ( ).
V& A Q & , 1,0 .
, CO2. V& A Q &
, , (V& A Q& = 10 ) , V& A Q & ,
0,1. ,
. , , .
, ,
& , . , , ,
V& A Q
(, - ?). V& A Q& , -
. V& A Q & ,
, , - , . Qs/QT

V & A Q& , )
, V & -
& A Q, (. ).

CO2. MIGET, ,
, & A Q& - . -
V
, -
, ,
CO2. -
, CO2,
15-2. & A Q& , . -
V
V & A Q& V & A Q& -
, -
, .49 ,
. (,
, , ,
( , ) (. ). A
II 404

V & A Q& , , -
- .
, , , 50%
- .
. , ,
V & A Q& . & A Q& , .
, V
, .50 -
- . -, .
- V & A Q&
. -
(. 15-14,
). , .
.
, .51 -
CO2, , (-
, V & A Q?& - ) (, , -
, CO2 ).
CO2, O2 , , -
PO2, - .47 ,
. , . CO2 . -,
V &
& A Q, & A Q&
V
.31 , , -
, , - . -
CO2 , PAO2
PaCO2 . - ,
, - PACO2 -
V & A Q& . ,
.
,
. ,
, - PaO2 PIO2,
PaO2, - , .
, , 25%, PaO2
. , - , 30% , -
, -
, . .51
, , - PaO2
, PO2
- .
(. . 15-10). , ,
, PaO2 . - O2,
, PIO2, ,
PaO2 , . -
, .
40-45 . . ( 5-6 ).31,49 -
, ,
,
.


; PaO2 , -
! ,
,
PaO2, , -
, , -
.
- -
.52 , -
.
(FIO2) 0,3 0,4. -
, , -
- ,
, - , -
CO2 . ,
PaO2 , , PaCO2. - 85-90%,
, 2% 3% , 30 . 20%
A , - , -
405 15
81% - , .60
5 .53 -
, .
1-2%

20% - (-
.54 ) (

II
) 95 60 / . .61
. ,
, - , -
, - -
(
. , , , -
, - 187 / . .
, - 149 / . .
(.. ) (.. ).61
), , , -
. -
( ) ,
. - ,
, .61 -
(
) -
. - . , -
, , ,
. .
,
(.
15-15).



() 0,8-1 -

( ), Bendixen
0,4-0,5 .55 - -
- 3,5 2 , - .62 -
.
, - ,
,56,57 , , . -
- .
( ).58 - -
-
. , PaO2 . ,
20% -
.
, . , -
, , ,
, . -
-
.
. ISPOCD1
, , 1990 .53
, .58 -
. 15-8. . -
, , , .
. 15-16.
- 90% -
.63
, - , -
.58,59 , ,
.58
, , , -
- 5-6% , A
II 406

. 15-15

-
() -
.
( )
(CL).
-


(Raw)

1.
2. CL
3. Raw

15-20%. , - MIGET
, -
, .
, , 45 -
20-40% , - ,
. , 15% 20% , =
- 0,8 + 1,7 (r = 0,81, P < 0,01) , -
, -
! , ,
, . , -
.63 --
.64 , SPECT*
, (.
- 15-18).69
.65 , -

50%
.66 ,
, ,
( ) (. .
15-17). . -
- 10 . .
,
()58,67 , - .
,
. , ,
, .58 ,
: - . -
, .63 ,
, -
. ,
45 .68 , . -,
, ,
. ,
, - Hewlett . 1974. -
, -
* ,
A . single-photon emission computed tomography (. .)
407 15

II
. 15-17
.
. -
, -
. (
Reber A, Nylund U, Hedenstierna G: Position and shape of the diaphragm:
Implications for atelectasis formation. Anaesthesia 53:1054-1061, 1998.)

,
,
.58
,
, -
.
. 15-16
.72
( ), ,
( ). - -
. .
.
.
, .
(sigh) VT
( / ). /
- .73 -
.


20 . . .67
.70 , 30
- . .,
- . -
, ,
(. 15-19). 40 . . (. 15-20). -

, , ().
.71 , - -, -
, - ,
. -
.74 ,
-
. -, 40 . .,
- 7-8 , -
. 1 - .
, , .
.58 ,
. - ,
, - .75 C
, , 40%
. , -
. 40
, - 20% . , -
. , - A
II 408


C
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0

. 15-18 () ( )
( ) . , -
, , .
, , ( ).
. V& A Q &
. ( ).
. ,
( ). , , , .
IV, , ,
. ( Tokics L, Hedenstierna G, Svensson L, etal: V/Q distribution and correlation to atelectasis in anesthetized paralyzed humans. J Appl
Physiol 81:1822-1833, 1996.)

Paw 0

ZEEP Gen.PEEP Sel.PEEP Paw 20 Paw 40

. 15-19 , -. -
.
(ZEEP)
,
, 33% 40%
. 10 . . -
, . 15-20 (
. );
. , , ( );
, 10 30 . .,
. ., , ( ); -
40 . . .
. , ( ). ,
, , , - ,
. - .
. (Hedenstierna G, Baehrendtz S, Klingstedt C, et al: Ventilation .
and perfusion of each lung during differential ventilation with selective PEEP. 10 . ., ,
Anesthesiology 61:369-376, 1984.) ( ). 20
. .
. 30 . .
(), . -
(PAW ) 40 . .
. , -
( ,

). ( Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al: Reexpansion of atelectasis
during general anaesthesia: A computed tomography study. Br J Anaesth 71:788-795,
1993.)
A
409 15
(. . FIO2 . -
0,3-0,4), (100% O2) 10
.
.79
, - , -
- 100% -
. 100% O2 .

II
-
, (40%)
. - .
( 30% O2)
- .
.76
12 100% O2 -
, 80% O2, 12 ,
60% O2.77
, 100% O2, .
80% O2 -
60% O2 (. 15-21). V & A Q& ,
- , .
, 25 (.
, . 15-7),
& A Q& .47
V
(CPAP). 0,4-0,5 ,55 ,
CPAP 10 . ., Rusca . - -
100% - . , -
.78 .80,81
- , -
, , . 15-18, -
, .
. , , -
.
, V & -
& A Q,
.
. - 74% -
,
, , -
, - 57:
! , -
PaO2 ( mmHg ) = 218 22 ln atelectasis (cm2 ) ,
, 0.06 (CV ERV ) ( mL )
(CVERV) -
25 FRC, CV ,
ERV (expiratory reserve volume)
20 , -
(2 )

, ln =
15
.
10 -
.
5 -
,
0
, , -
0 20 40 60 80 100
, -
FETO2 (%) . . 15-22,
,
. 15-21 , V &
& A Q.
( )
. -
100% , 12 80%, 12 -
60% . ,
, 60%, 80% 100%.
, 100%

( ), 80% 60%
, 60%
.
(FETO2) 25% , Rothen , ,
30% . ,
(Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al: Prevention of atelectasis during general
anesthesia. Lancet 345:1387-1391, 1995.)
- A
II 410

0 . .
6,5 .. 0,6
A

A
0,4

/
B
1 . . QS/QT = 6%
C 0,2

VA /Q
0,0
0 0,01 0,1 1 10 100
A.
B.
C.
. 15-22 . ( ).
( ), -
(, ). . . 15-7.
(MIGET), . , , -
, , . 15-7. -
, , ( )

.
SPECT , - , -
,
, . ,
.69 , , ,
, , -
, , (. . 15-18).

(. . 15-18). ,
. ,
, ,
, . -
.82 , -
- .71,83
-
, - , ,
, . , -
.83 ,
, ,
, .
. ,
-
, (),
- ,
, ,
, ().
( ). -
().84 -
,
, , -
, , .
- -
A SPECT.69 , , -
411 15
100

. 15-23 , - 90
+ N2O
-
80 + N2O
()
-


(). ,
70

II
-
60
-
, 1 ,
50
20% 30%,
, -
40
. ,
,
30

, , -
20
. ( Marshall BE. Hypoxic
pulmonary Vasoconstriction. Acta Anaesthesiol 10
Scand 94:37-41, 1990.)
0
0 1,0 2,0 3,0
()

, , pH , ( ), , -
CO2 . -
( V &
& A Q).
50% - & &
VA Q
, 2 ( - (FIO2).
) (. 15-23).85 , -
V & A Q& . FIO2
- V & A Q& -
, .88

, - V & A Q&
, 45
(. 15-25).63
CO2, . -
CO2 - 15-3.
. -
* , -
, ,
- V & A Q& ,
.73
MIGET , (log
CO2 - SDQ).
, log SDQ
- - 0,43
, - 0,8 . ,
V & A Q&
& A Q& (. 15-24). V 8%.
1% -
- 9% -
( ,
[ I]).52 - (37-64), , -
CO2 - V & A Q& (log SDQ 0,47 -
, 1,01 ).
.

, , , -
, - ,
, - V & log SDQ
& A Q,
.86,87 , 0,87 1,73 -
, . ,
10% 15%,
. (0-30%).

V& A Q& , log SDQ, -
* ,
.
single breath nitrogen washout test (.
.) Hedenstierna .52 A
II 412

1,0

PaO2
92 . .
0,6
. 15-24
V& A Q &
,
0,2
VA/Q
10 . . 0
0 0,01 0,1 1 10 100
V& A Q &

& , -
V& A Q 1,2
. QS 170% .
-
, 0,9 PaO2
127 . .
( -
). 0,6
,
& , ,
V& A Q
. 0,3
VA/Q
,
V& A Q& -
- 0
. 0 0,01 0,1 1 10 100
-
. 0,7
, .
& -
V& A Q
- PaO2
0,5 192 . .
, ,

QS 6,6%
0,3


0,1 VA/Q

0
0 0,01 0,1 1 10 100


- . -
. , ,89 -
(, ),90 ,56,58
CO2. , ,
- .95 ,
. ,
. - Froese Bryan,96 -
- -
.91 , ,
-
. - .
.92 ,
CO2 , , -
,93,94 .
CO2. , -
, -
CO2
- . V & A Q&
, ?
,
,
,
, -
( V & -
& A Q).
Dueck .97
, V & A Q& , -
, ,
A . - .
413 15

16
(FIO2), 0,4. Anjou
Q Lindskog .98 (FIO2 0,21)
A/
%

12 V




+

II

1% 2%, log

8 SDQ 0,77 1,3. FIO2 0,5,


3% 4%. -
,
4
(. Hedenstierna52), FIO2
0,53 0,85 7% 10%
. , -
0 FIO2, ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -
() () FIO285

. 15-25 , + V& A Q & V & 88
& A Q.
.
, -
+ V& A Q & . ,
- -
+ V& A Q & , - (. . 36),
. (Gunnarsson L, Tokics L, Gustavsson H, etal: Influence of -
age on atelectasis formation and gas-exchange impairment during general-
anesthesia. Br J Anaesth 66:423-432, 1991.)

. Heneghan
.99
log SDQ, - .
V & 0,66
& A Q, ,
0,83 0,89 - , . ,
- -
, . , -
.
(1% -
11% 14% ,
). . -
-
log SDQ 1% 0,47 ,
, 6% 1,03 -
8% 1,01 100, -
.52 , -
-
, . ,
.101
. , -
V& A Q&

,102 -
15-3 .103 , ,
() -
.104
& T = (Cc Q
Ca Q & c ) + (Cv Qs
& ) (1)

,
& =Q
Qc & T Qs
& (2) , ,
(2) (1), :, .
& T = (Cc Q ,
T Qs ) + (Cv Qs )
Ca Q & & &

.105
:
&
Qs Cc Ca
= , -
& T Cc Cv
Q
(. . 71 82).73
Cc, Ca Cv - , -
, , , ,
; QT ; Qc ,
; Qs - A
II 414

, - CPAP.112
.63
23 69 . - CPAP,
, V & A Q& - .
,
V & ,
& A Q, , 100%,
. . 15-25
, , -
V & A Q& . , .
- ,75
50 , 30%, ,

- ( -
log SDQ). .51 -
log SDQ -
, , .
, -
, - 86,108,110, -
20 . , log SDQ ,
- ,
! .
-
-
(. . 64).106,107 .
, ,
, - , -
, - .113
.108
-
.57,77 -
()
,
67,109, .73 -
(. 15-26).108 , -
CPAP , ,
MIGET, -
- . ,
.87,110,111 - , -
, -
, ,
, log SDQ
20 ( . Hedenstierna52).
,
MIGET ,
,
15 .68
V & A Q&
(2)

-
V & A Q& . ,
10 , -
, , -
.
-
5 , -

, -
. ,
0
V & -
& A Q,
0 20 25 30 35
. , -
(/2)
. 15-26 , , . ,
, , , -
(). , V & A Q& ,
. ( Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G,
A et al: Reexpansion of atelectasis during general anaesthesia: A computed tomography
study. Br J Anaesth 71:788-795, 1993.)
.
415 15
(+55%), , -
(+80%).
(. . 51 ,
52). ,
, . ,
20% -
.114,115 , , ,

II
- ,
.
.114 Pasquina . CPAP -
(NIPSV),
. - 30 4 -
CO2 .124 -
. - 150 ,
MIGET - .
116 5 . .
- - 8-10 / NIPSV.
.52 60%
NIPSV 40% CPAP.

-
.
, NIPSV
- .
, -
-
(. . 60).117 FIO2 5 . .,
,
, - .
. - ,
CPAP.
, - Miranda . -
-
1-2 ,
20-30% .118,119 .125
, - -
30 . . 20 46 .
, - . PaO2/FIO2 50 *. ,
.118 (. .
, PaO2) , 17 . .
40 . . - ,
, -
-
. .
-
-
, . Tschernko .126 ,
.120-122 Dyhr .123 ,
30 , - ,
. . ,
(,
10- , - (7,5 10,3 -
45 . .) ). -
, , ,
12 . ., - ,
. 75 . (12,6 ).

PaO2 -
().
PaO2, 50%.
, PaO2
, 75-80%,
-
. 1,0. , .
12 . . Dyhr , ,
. * 375 . .(. .)
A
II 416

,
-
(. . 59).127 -
.
, - .
CO2 Ishikawa .
. - , -
.131
PaO2 (. 15-27). -
- ,
, ,
.128 - PaO2 ,
, , . , , -
, , -
.101 , .
() - ,
. Tusman .129
-
() 10 , - -
, .
, -
. ,
25 .132
30, 35 40 . . - ,
5 10, 12 20 . . ,
25 , ,
5 . . PaO2 -
217 . . 470 . . .133
. 4,3 . . ,
, , 6,2 . .
. 6,0 . . .
Tusman . 10%
, , PaO2
(11,7 10,5 FIO2 0,5).
.130 ;
. , -
CO2 , , -
( III) , . -
-
Slinger .134
( -
).
, 50 105 . . -

. 15-27 -


.

-
-
,

-
.
, ,

,
,
, -

A
417 15
-
PaO2 - , ,152
,135 136,137 - ,153
.138 154 -
. .155 , -
,
- .156 -

II
. -
20 ppm*
- .
. - , CO2.
,


-,
. -
, - , ,
- (. . 93).
- . ,
NO,139 - , .157 Westerdahl .
, ,
.140,141 , ,
( )
.142
.158 ,
. - -
, -
.
, . , -
, - - -
.143 .
,
, ,
-
( ).144
, - .159
.145 , -
- 5-16%, -
- ;
, (REM-
.146,147 ). ,
.160
, -
REM-
, 0,3 , 10%
- .161
. -
CO2 (. . 68). - ,
CO2 -
, . .162 ,
CO2 (-
) .148,149 (FIO2 0,3). -
- 100% ,
, .75
, , -
.150 , -
.
.151
* (parts per million) (. .)

A
II 418


1. Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, et al: Lung tions: Effect of heart weight and diaphragmatic 43. Moudgil R, Michelakis ED, Archer SL: Hypoxic
volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report compliance. Physiologist 32:191, 1989. pulmonary vasoconstriction. J Appl Physiol
Working Party Standardization of Lung Function 22. Mayo JR, MacKay AL, Whittall KP, et al: Measure- 98:390-403, 2005.
Tests. European Community for Steel and Coal. ment of lung water content and pleural pressure 44. HambraeusJonzon K, Bindslev L, Jolin Mellgrd
Eur Respir J Suppl 16:5-40, 1993. gradient with magnetic resonance imaging. J , et al: Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in
2. Astrom E, Niklason L, Drefeldt B, et al: Partitioning Thorac Imaging 10:73-81, 1995. human lungs. Anesthesiology 86: 308-315, 1997.
of dead spacea method and reference values in 23. Petersson J, SnchezCrespo A, Rohdin M, et al: 45. Sartori C, Allemann Y, Scherrer U. Pathogenesis of
the awake human. Eur Respir J 16:659-664, 2000. Physiological evaluation of a new quantitative pulmonary edema: Learning from high-altitude
3. Broughton SJ, Sylvester KP, Page CM, et al: Prob- SPECT method measuring regional ventilation and pulmonary edema. Respir Phys Neurobiol 159:338-
lems in the measurement of functional residual perfusion. J Appl Physiol 96:1127-1136, 2004. 349, 2007.
capacity. Physiol Meas 27:99-107, 2006. 24. Bake B, Wood L, Murphy B, et al: Effect of inspira- 46. Roca J, Wagner PD: Contribution of multiple inert
4. Hogg K, Dawson D, Tabor T, et al: Respiratory dead tory flow-rate on regional distribution of inspired gas elimination technique to pulmonary medicine.
space measurement in the investigation of pulmo- gas. J Appl Physiol 37:8-17, 1974. 1. Principles and information content of the multi-
nary embolism in outpatients with pleuritic chest 25. MilicEmili J, Torchio R, DAngelo E: Closing ple inert gas elimination technique. Thorax 49:815-
pain. Chest 128:2195-2202, 2005. volume: A reappraisal (1967-2007). Eur J Appl 824, 1994.
5. Wilschut FA, van der Grinten CPM, Lamers RJS, Physiol 99:567-583, 2007. 47. Agust AG, Barber JA: Contribution of multiple
et al: Intrapulmonary gas mixing and the sloping 26. Teculescu DB, Damel MC, Costantino E, et al: inert gas elimination technique to pulmonary med-
alveolar plateau in COPD patients with macro- Computerized single-breath nitrogen washout: icine. 2. Chronic pulmonary diseases: Chronic
scopic emphysema. Eur Respir J 14:166-171, 1999. Predicted values in a rural French community. obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pul-
6. Roca J, Burgos F, Barbera JA, et al: Prediction equa- Lung 174:43-55, 1996. monary fibrosis. Thorax 49:924-932, 1994.
tions for plethysmographic lung volumes. Respir 27. Nield MA, Hoo GWS, Roper JM, et al: Efficacy of 48. RodriguezRoisin R, Roca J: Contributions of mul-
Med 92:454-460, 1998. pursed-lips breathinga breathing pattern retrain- tiple inert gas elimination technique to pulmonary
7. Pellegrino R, Brusasco V: On the causes of lung ing strategy for dyspnea reduction. J Cardiopulm medicine. 3. Bronchial asthma. Thorax 49:1027-
hyperinflation during bronchoconstriction. Eur Rehabil Prev 27:237-244, 2007. 1033, 1994.
Respir J 10:468-475, 1997. 28. Mead J, Turner JM, Macklem PT, Little JB: Signifi- 49. Agust AG, Roca J, Gea J, et al: Mechanisms of gas-
8. Leith D, Mead J: Mechanisms determining residual cance of relationship between lung recoil and exchange impairment in idiopathic pulmonary
volume of the lungs in normal subjects. J Appl maximum expiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 22:95- fibrosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 143:219-225, 1991.
Physiol 23:221-227, 1967. 108, 1967. 50. Manier G, Castaing Y: Contribution of multiple
9. Grassino AE, Roussos C: Static properties of the 29. HaefeliBleuer B, Weibel ER: Morphometry of the inert gas elimination technique to pulmonary med-
lung and chest wall. In Crystal RG, West JB, Weibel human pulmonary acinus. Anat Rec 220:401-414, icine. 4. Gas exchange abnormalities in pulmonary
ER, Barnes PJ (eds): The Lung: Scientific Founda- 1988. vascular and cardiac disease. Thorax 49:1169-1174,
tions, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, LippincottRaven, 30. Adaro F, Piiper J: Limiting role of stratification in 1994.
1997, pp 1187-1202. alveolar exchange of oxygen. Respir Physiol 26:195- 51. Melot C: Contribution of multiple inert gas elimi-
10. Goldin JG: Quantitative CT of the lung. Radiol Clin 206, 1976. nation technique to pulmonary medicine. 5.
North Am 40:145-162, 2002. 31. West JB: Respiratory PhysiologyThe Essentials, Ventilation-perfusion relationships in acute res-
11. VanLith P, Johnson FN, Sharp JT. Respiratory 4th ed. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1990. piratory failure. Thorax 49:1251-1258, 1994.
elastances in relaxed and paralyzed states in normal 32. Hughes JMB, Bates DV: Historical review: The 52. Hedenstierna G: Contribution of multiple inert gas
and abnormal men. J Appl Physiol 23:475-486, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (Dlco) and its elimination technique to pulmonary medicine. 6.
1967. membrane (D-M) and red cell (Theta V ) compo- Ventilation-perfusion relationships during anes-
12. Pedley TJ, Kamm RD: Dynamics of gas flow and nents. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 138:115-142, 2003. thesia. Thorax 50:85-91, 1995.
pressure-flow relationships. In Crystal RG, West JB, 33. Dawson CA, Linehan JH: Dynamics of blood flow 53. Moller JT, Cluitmans P, Rasmussen LS, et al: Long-
Weibel ER, Barnes PJ (eds): The Lung: Scientific and pressure-flow relationships. In Crystal RG, term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the
Foundations, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott West JB, Weibel ER, Barnes PJ (eds): The Lung: elderly: ISPOCD1 study. Lancet 351:857-861, 1998.
Raven, 1997, pp 1365-1380. Scientific Foundations, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lip- 54. Kroenke K, Lawrence VA, Theroux JF, et al: Post-
13. Slats AM, Janssen K, van Schadewijk A, et al: Bron- pincottRaven, 1997, pp 1503-1522. operative complications after thoracic and major
chial inflammation and airway responses to deep 34. Jeffery PK: Remodeling and inflammation of abdominal-surgery in patients with and without
inspiration in asthma and chronic obstructive bronchi in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmo- obstructive lung-disease. Chest 104:1445-1451,
pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med nary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 1:176-183, 2004. 1993.
176:121-128, 2007. 35. Hughes JMB. Distribution of pulmonary blood 55. Wahba RWM: Perioperative functional residual
14. Holst M, Striem J, Hedenstierna G: Errors in tra- flow. In Crystal RG, West JB, Weibel ER, Barnes capacity. Can J Anaesth 38:384-400, 1991.
cheal pressure recording in patients with a trache- PJ (eds): The Lung: Scientific Foundations, 56. Westbrook PR, Stubbs SE, Sessler AD, et al: Effects
ostomy tubea model study. Intensive Care Med 2nd ed. Philadelphia, LippincottRaven, 1997, pp of anesthesia and muscle paralysis on respiratory
16:384-389, 1990. 1523-1536. mechanics in normal man. J Appl Physiol 34:81-86,
15. Verbeken EK, Cauberghs M, Mertens I, et al: Tissue 36. Glenny RW, Lamm WJE, Albert RK, et al: Gravity 1973.
and airway impedance of excised normal, senile, is a minor determinant of pulmonary blood-flow 57. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al: Airway
and emphysematous lungs. J Appl Physiol 72:2343- distribution. J Appl Physiol 71:620-629, 1991. closure, atelectasis and gas exchange during general
2353, 1992. 37. Dutrieue B, Paiva M, Verbanck S, et al: Tidal anaesthesia. B J Anaesth 81:681-686, 1998.
16. Tantucci C, Corbeil C, Chasse M, et al: Flow and volume single-breath wash-in of SF6 and CH4 in 58. Hedenstierna G, Edmark L: The effects of anesthe-
volume dependence of respiratory system flow transient microgravity. J Appl Physiol 94:75-82, sia and muscle paralysis on the respiratory system.
resistance in patients with adult respiratory- 2003. Intensive Care Med 31:1327-1335, 2005.
distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 145:355- 38. Glenny RW, Bernard S, Robertson HT, et al: Gravity 59. Reber A, Nylund U, Hedenstierna G: Position and
360, 1992. is an important but secondary determinant of shape of the diaphragm: Implications for atelectasis
17. Frostell C, Pande J, Hedenstierna G: Effects of high regional pulmonary blood flow in upright primates. formation. Anaesthesia 53:1054-1061, 1998.
frequency breathing on pulmonary ventilation and J Appl Physiol 86:623-632, 1999 60. Warner DO, Warner MA, Ritman EL: Atelectasis
gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 55:1374-1378, 1983. 39. Hlastala MP, Bernard SL, Erickson HH, et al: Pul- and chest wall shape during halothane anesthesia.
18. Milic Emili J: Ventilation distribution. In Hammid monary blood flow distribution in standing horses Anesthesiology 85:49-59, 1996.
Q, Shannon J, Martin J (eds): Physiologic Bases of is not dominated by gravity. J Appl Physiol 81:1051- 61. Don H: The mechanical properties of the respira-
Respiratory Disease. Hamilton, Ontario, BC 1061, 1996. tory system during anesthesia. Int Anesthesiol Clin
Decker, 2005, pp 133-141. 40. Hakim TS, Lisbona R, Dean GW: Gravity- 15:113-126, 1977.
19. Guy HJB, Prisk GK, Elliott AR, et al: Inhomogene- independent inequality in pulmonary blood-flow 62. Bendixen HH, Hedleywhyte J, Laver MB: Impaired
ity of pulmonary ventilation during sustained in humans. J Appl Physiol 63:1114-1121, 1987. oxygenation in surgical patients during general
microgravity as determined by single-breath wash- 41. Hedenstierna G, White FC, Wagner PD: Spatial- anesthesia with controlled ventilationa concept
outs. J Appl Physiol 76:1719-1729, 1994. distribution of pulmonary blood-flow in the dog with of atelectasis. N Engl J Med 269:991-996, 1963.
20. Prisk GK: Physiology of a microgravity environ- peep ventilation. J Appl Physiol 47:938-946, 1979. 63. Gunnarsson L, Tokics L, Gustavsson H, et al: Influ-
ment, microgravity and the lung. J Appl Physiol 42. Marshall BE, Hanson CW, Frasch F, et al: Role of ence of age on atelectasis formation and gas-
89:385-396, 2000. hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in pulmonary exchange impairment during general-anesthesia.
21. Ganesan S, LaiFook S: Finite element analysis of gas-exchange and blood-flow distribution 2. Patho- Br J Anaesth 66:423-432, 1991.
A regional lung expansion in prone and supine posi- physiology. Intensive Care Med 20:379-389, 1994. 64. Lindberg P, Gunnarsson L, Tokics L, et al: Atelec-
419 15
tasis and lung-function in the postoperative period. Anesth Analg 98:1491-1495, 2004. obese patients undergoing laparotomies with
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 36:546-553, 1992. 88. Dantzker DR, Wagner PD, West JB: Instability of general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
65. van Kaam AH, Lachmann RA, Herting E, et al: lung units with low V & A Q& ratios during O2 breath- 47:742-750, 2003.
Reducing atelectasis attenuates bacterial growth ing. J Appl Physiol 38:886-895, 1975. 108. Pelosi P, Croci M, Ravagnan I, et al: The effects of
and translocation in experimental pneumonia. Am 89. Sakai EM, Connolly LA, Klauck JA: Inhalation body mass on lung volumes, respiratory mechanics,
J Respir Crit Care Med 169:1046-1053, 2004. anesthesiology and volatile liquid anesthetics: and gas exchange during general anesthesia.
66. Tenling A, Hachenberg T, Tyden H, et al: Atelecta- Focus on isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane. Anesth Analg 87:654-660, 1998.
sis and gas exchange after cardiac surgery. Anesthe- Pharmacotherapy 25:1773-1788, 2005. 109. Eichenberger A, Proietti S, Wicky S, et al: Morbid

II
siology 89:371-378, 1998. 90. von UngernSternberg BS, Frei FJ, Hammer J, et al: obesity and postoperative pulmonary atelectasis:
67. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al: Reexpan- Impact of depth of propofol anaesthesia on func- An underestimated problem. Anesth Analg 95:
sion of atelectasis during general anaesthesia: A tional residual capacity and ventilation distribution 1788-1792, 2002.
computed tomography study. Br J Anaesth 71:788- in healthy preschool children. Br J Anaesth 98;503- 110. Cressey DM, Berthoud MC, Reilly CS: Effective-
795, 1993. 508, 2007. ness of continuous positive airway pressure to
68. Gunnarsson L, Tokics L, Lundquist H, et al: 91. Ide T, Sakurai Y, Aono M, Nishino T: Contribution enhance pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese
Chronic obstructive pulmonary-disease and anesthesia- of peripheral chemoreception to the depression of women. Anaesthesia 56:680-684, 2001.
formation of atelectasis and gas-exchange impair- the hypoxic ventilatory response during halothane 111. Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, et al: Positive end-
ment. Eur Respiry J 4:1106-1116, 1991. anesthesia in cats. Anesthesiology 90:1084-1091, expiratory pressure during induction of general
69. Tokics L, Hedenstierna G, Svensson L, et al: V/Q 1999. anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea
distribution and correlation to atelectasis in anes- 92. Morton CP, Drummond GB: Change in chest wall in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 100:580-
thetized paralyzed humans. J Appl Physiol 81:1822- dimensions on induction of anaesthesia: A reap- 584, 2005.
1833, 1996. praisal. Br J Anaesth 73:135-139, 1994. 112. Berthoud MC, Peacock JE, Reilly CS: Effectiveness
70. Hewlett AM, Hulands GH, Nunn JF, et al: 93. Warner DO, Warner MA: Human chest wall func- of preoxygenation in morbidly obese patients. B J
Functional residual capacity during anesthesia III: tion while awake and during halothane anesthesia. Anaesth 67:464-466, 1991.
Artificial ventilation. Br J Anaesth 46:495-503, II. Carbon dioxide rebreathing. Anesthesiology 113. Mynster T, Jensen LM, Jensen FG, et al: The effect
1974. 82:20-31, 1995. of posture on late postoperative oxygenation.
71. West JB, Dollery CT, Naimark A: Distribution 94. Warner DO, Joyner MJ, Ritman EL: Anesthesia and Anaesthesia 51:225-227, 1996.
of blood flow in isolated lungrelation to vascular chest wall function in dogs. J Appl Physiol 76:2802- 114. Warner DO, Warner MA, Ritman EL. Human chest
+ alveolar pressures. J Appl Physiol 19:713-724, 2813, 1994. wall function during epidural anesthesia. Anesthe-
1964. 95. Strandberg A, Tokics L, Brismar B, et al: Atelectasis siology 85:761-773, 1996.
72. Hedenstierna G, Tokics L, Lundquist H, et al: during anesthesia and in the postoperative period. 115. Yamakage M, Namiki A, Tsuchida H, et al: Changes
Phrenic-nerve stimulation during halothane anes- Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 30:154-158, 1986. in ventilatory pattern and arterial oxygen-
thesia. Anesthesiology 80:751-760, 1994. 96. Froese AB, Bryan CH: Effects of anesthesia and saturation during spinal-anesthesia in man. Acta
73. Nunn JF: Nunns applied respiratory physiology, paralysis on diaphragmatic mechanics in man. Anaesthesiol Scand 36:569-571, 1992.
4th ed. London, Butterworth Heinemann, 1993. Anesthesiology 41:242-255, 1974. 116. McCarthy GS: Effect of thoracic extradural analge-
74. Rothen HU, Neumann P, Berglund JE, et al: 97. Dueck R, Rathbun M, Greenburg AG: Lung-vol- sia on pulmonary gas distribution, functional
Dynamics of re-expansion of atelectasis during ume and V & A Q& distribution response to intrave- residual capacity and airway-closure. B J Anaesth
general anaesthesia. B J Anaesth 82:551-556, 1999. nous versus inhalation anesthesia in sheep. 48:243-248, 1976.
75. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al: Influence Anesthesiology 61:55-65, 1984. 117. Hachenberg T, Brussel T, Roos N, et al: Gas-
of gas-composition on recurrence of atelectasis 98. AnjouLindskog E, Broman L, Broman M, et al: exchange impairment and pulmonary densities
after a reexpansion maneuver during general-anes- Effects of intravenous anesthesia on V& A Q& distribu- after cardiac-surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
thesia. Anesthesiology 82:832-842, 1995. tiona study performed during ventilation 36:800-805, 1992.
76. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al: Prevention with air and with 50-percent oxygen, supine and in 118. Tenling A, Hachenberg T, Tyden H, et al: Atelecta-
of atelectasis during general anesthesia. Lancet the lateral position. Anesthesiology 62:485-492, sis and gas exchange after cardiac surgery. Anesthe-
345:1387-1391, 1995. 1985. siology 89:371-378, 1998.
77. Edmark L, KostovaAherdan K, Enlund M, et al: 99. Heneghan CPH, Bergman NA, Jones JG: Changes 119. Hachenberg T, Tenling A, Hansson HE, et al: The
Optimal oxygen concentration during induction of in lung-volume and (Pao2Pao2) during anesthesia. ventilation-perfusion relation and gas exchange in
general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 98:28-33, 2003. B J Anaesth 56:437-445, 1984. mitral valve disease and coronary artery disease
78. Rusca M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, et al: Prevention of 100. Klingstedt C, Hedenstierna G, Lundquist H, et al: implications for anesthesia, extracorporeal circula-
atelectasis formation during induction of general The influence of body position and differential ven- tion, and cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 86:809-
anesthesia. Anesth Analg 97:1835-1839, 2003. tilation on lung dimensions and atelectasis forma- 817, 1997.
79. Benot Z, Wicky S, Fischer JF, et al: The Effect of tion in anesthetized man. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 120. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Curran RD, et al: Influence
increased Fio2 before tracheal extubation on post- 34:315-322, 1990. of a vital capacity maneuver on pulmonary gas
operative atelectasis. Anesth Analg 95:1777-1781, 101. Klingstedt C, Hedenstierna G, Baehrendtz S, et al: exchange after cardiopulmonary bypass. J
2002. Ventilation-perfusion relationships and atelectasis Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 15:336-340, 2001.
80. Dueck R, Prutow RJ, Davies NJH, et al: The lung- formation in the supine and lateral positions during 121. Dyhr T, Laursen N, Larsson A: Effects of lung
volume at which shunting occurs with inhalation conventional mechanical and differential ventila- recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory
anesthesia. Anesthesiology 69:854-861, 1988. tion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 34:421-429, 1990. pressure on lung volume, respiratory mechanics
81. Hedenstierna G: Alveolar collapse and closure of 102. Landmark SJ, Knopp TJ, Rehder K, et al: Regional and alveolar gas mixing in patients ventilated after
airways: Regular effects of anaesthesia. Clin Physiol pulmonary perfusion and V-Q in awake and cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46:717-
Funct Imaging 23:123-129, 2003. anesthetized-paralyzed man. J Appl Physiol 43:993- 725, 2002.
82. Hedenstierna G, Baehrendtz S, Klingstedt C, et al: 1000, 1977. 122. Claxton BA, Morgan P, McKeague H, et al: Alveolar
Ventilation and perfusion of each lung during dif- 103. Mure M, Glenny RW, Domino KB, et al: Pulmonary recruitment strategy improves arterial oxygenation
ferential ventilation with selective PEEP. Anesthe- gas exchange improves in the prone position with after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anaesthesia 58:111-
siology 61:369-376, 1984. abdominal distension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 116, 2003.
83. Hulands GH, Greene R, Iliff LD, et al: Influence of 157:1785-1790, 1998. 123. Dyhr T, Nygard E, Laursen N, et al: Both lung
anaesthesia on regional distribution of perfusion 104. Glenny RW, Robertson HT: Fractal modeling of recruitment maneuver and PEEP are needed to
and ventilation in lung. Clin Sci 38:451-460, 1970. pulmonary blood-flow heterogeneity. J Appl increase oxygenation and lung volume after cardiac
84. Marshall BE: Effects of anesthetics on pulmonary Physiol 70:1024-1030, 1991. surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 48:187-197, 2004.
gas exchange. In Stanley TH, Sperry RJ (eds): Anes- 105. Mure M, Nyrn S, Radell P, et al: Regional lung 124. Pasquina P, Merlani P, Granier JM, et al:
thesia and the Lung. London, Kluwer Academic, perfusion is more uniform in the prone than in the Continuous positive airway pressure versus nonin-
1989, pp 117-125. supine posture in healthy subjects during anesthe- vasive pressure support ventilation to treat atelec-
85. Marshall BE: Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. sia and mechanical ventilation. (Abstract). Paper tasis after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 94:37-41, 1990. presented at the 9th Congress of the World Federa- 99:1001-1008, 2004.
86. Pelosi P, Ravagnan I, Giurati G, et al: Positive end- tion of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care 125. Miranda DR, Gommers D, Struijs A, et al: The open
expiratory pressure improves respiratory function Medicine, 2006, Buenos Aires, Argentina. lung concept: Effects on right ventricular afterload
in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthe- 106. BrooksBrunn JA: Predictors of postoperative pul- after cardiac surgery. B J Anaesth 93:327-332, 2004.
sia and paralysis. Anesthesiology 91:1221-1231, monary complications following abdominal 126. Tschernko EM, Bambazek A, Wisser W, et al:
1999. surgery. Chest 111:564-571, 1997. Intrapulmonary shunt after cardiopulmonary
87. Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, et al: Prevention 107. Yoshino J, Akata T, Takahashi S: Intraoperative bypass: The use of vital capacity maneuvers versus
of atelectasis formation during the induction of changes in arterial oxygenation during volume- off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac
general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. controlled mechanical ventilation in modestly Cardiovasc Surg 124:732-738, 2002.
A
II 420

127. Benumof JL: One-lung ventilation and hypoxic pul- thesia: The preferred anesthetic technique for tho- 150. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, et al: Circulatory and
monary vasoconstrictionimplications for anes- racic surgery. Anesth Analg 92:848-854, 2001. respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insuf-
thetic management. Anesth Analg 64:821-833, 139. Schwarzkopf K, Klein U, Schreiber T, et al: Oxy- flation. Dig Surg 21:95-105, 2004.
1985. genation during one-lung ventilation: The effects of 151. Bablekos GD, Michaelides SA, Roussou T, et al:
128. Hedenstierna G, Reber A: Manipulating pulmo- inhaled nitric oxide and increasing levels of inspired Changes in breathing control and mechanics after
nary blood flow during one-lung anaesthesia. Acta fraction of oxygen. Anesth Analg 92:842-847, 2001. laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy. Arch Surg
Anaesthesiol Scand 40:2-4, 1996. 140. Moutafis M, Liu N, Dalibon N, et al: The effects 141:16-22, 2006.
129. Tusman G, Bohm SH, Melkun F, et al: Alveolar of inhaled nitric oxide and its combination with 152. Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS, Kauko M: Ventilatory
recruitment strategy increases arterial oxygenation intravenous almitrine on Pao2 during one-lung effects, blood-gas changes, and oxygen-
during one-lung ventilation. Ann Thorac Surg ventilation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic consumption during laparoscopic hysterectomy.
73:1204-1209, 2002. procedures. Anesth Analg 85:1130-1135, 1997. Anesth Analg 80:961-966, 1995.
130. Tusman G, Bohm SH, Sipmann FS, et al: Lung 141. SilvaCosta-Gomes T, Gallart L, Valls J, et al: Low- 153. Andersson LE, Baath M, Thorne A, et al: Effect of
recruitment improves the efficiency of ventilation vs high-dose almitrine combined with nitric oxide carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on develop-
and gas exchange during one-lung ventilation anes- to prevent hypoxia during open-chest one-lung ment of atelectasis during anesthesia, examined by
thesia. Anesth Analg 98:1604-1609, 2004. ventilation. B J Anaesth 95:410-416, 2005. spiral computed tomography. Anesthesiology
131. Ishikawa S, Nakazawa K, Makita K: Progressive 142. Moutafis M, Dalibon N, Liu N, et al: The effects of 102:293-299, 2005.
changes in arterial oxygenation during one-lung intravenous almitrine on oxygenation and hemo- 154. Makinen MT, YliHankala A: Respiratory compli-
anaesthesia are related to the response to compres- dynamics during one-lung ventilation. Anesth ance during laparoscopic hiatal and inguinal hernia
sion of the non-dependent lung. Br J Anaesth Analg 94:830-834, 2002. repair. Can J Anaesth 45:865-870, 1998.
90:21-26, 2003. 143. Dalibon N, Moutafis M, Liu N, et al: Treatment of 155. Sharma KC, Brandstetter RD, Brensilver JM, et al:
132. Ishikawa S, Nakazawa K, Makita K: Acute lung hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation using intra- Cardiopulmonary physiology and pathophysiology
injury following one-lung anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth venous almitrine. Anesth Analg 98:590-594, 2004. as a consequence of laparoscopic surgery. Chest
91:153-154, 2003. 144. Friedlander M, Sandler A, Kavanagh B, et al: Is 110:810-815, 1996.
133. Mascotto G, Bizzarri M, Messina M, et al: Prospec- hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction important 156. Andersson L, Lagerstrand L, Thorne A, et al: Effect
tive, randomized, controlled evaluation of the pre- during single lung ventilation in the lateral decubi- of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on ventilation-
ventive effects of positive end-expiratory pressure tus position? Can J Anesth 41:26-30, 1994. perfusion relationships during laparoscopic chole-
on patient oxygenation during one-lung ventila- 145. Choi Y, Bang S, Shim J, et al: Effects of head-down cystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46:552-560,
tion. Eur J Anaesthesiol 20:704-710, 2003. tilt on intrapulmonary shunt fraction and oxygena- 2002.
134. Slinger PD, Kruger M, McRae K, et al: Relation of tion during one-lung ventilation in the lateral decu- 157. Pasquina P, Tramer MR, Walder B: Prophylactic
the static compliance curve and positive end- bitus position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg respiratory physiotherapy after cardiac surgery:
expiratory pressure to oxygenation during one- 134:613-618, 2007. Systematic review. BMJ 327:1379-1381, 2003.
lung ventilation. Anesthesiology 95:1096-1102, 146. Dembinski R, Henzler R, Roissant R: Modulating 158. Westerdahl E, Lindmark B, Eriksson T, et al: Deep-
2001. the pulmonary circulation: An update. Minerva breathing exercises reduce atelectasis and improve
135. Garutti I, Quintana B, Olmedilla L, et al: Arterial Anesthsiol 70:239-243, 2004. pulmonary function after coronary artery bypass
oxygenation during one-lung ventilation: Com- 147. Schilling T, Kozian A, Huth C, et al: The pulmonary surgery. Chest 128:3482-3488, 2005.
bined versus general anesthesiain response. immune effects of mechanical ventilation in 159. Douglas NJ, White DP, Pickett CK, et al: Respira-
Anesth Analg 89:1332, 1999. patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Anesth tion during sleep in normal man. Thorax 37:840-
136. Garutti I, Cruz P, Olmedilla L, et al: Effects of Analg 101:957-965, 2005. 844, 1982.
thoracic epidural meperidine on arterial oxygena- 148. McMahon AJ, Fischbacher CM, Frame SH, et al: 160. Hudgel DW, Devadatta P: Decrease in functional
tion during one-lung ventilation in thoracic surgery. Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A residual capacity during sleep in normal humans. J
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 17:302-305, 2003. population-based study. Lancet 356:1632-1637, Appl Physiol 57:1319-1322, 1984.
137. Chow MYH, Goh MH, Boey SK, et al: The effects of 2000. 161. Ballard RD, Irvin CG, Martin RJ, et al: Influence of
remifentanil and thoracic epidural on oxygenation 149. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, et al: The sleep on lung-volume in asthmatic-patients and
and pulmonary shunt fraction during one-lung ven- European Association for Endoscopic Surgery normal subjects. J Appl Physiol 68:2034-2041,
tilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 17:69-72, 2003. clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperito- 1990.
138. Von Dossow V, Welte M, Zaune U, et al: Thoracic neum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc Other 162. Appelberg J, Pavlenko T, Bergman H, et al: Lung
epidural anesthesia combined with general anes- Intervent Tech 16:1121-1143, 2002. aeration during sleep. Chest 131:122-129, 2007.

A
Lena S. Sun Johanna C. Schwarzenberger
..
..

-
16


1. 7. -

, . .
2. 8. - ,
, , , .
. 9. , ,
3.
, , ,
.
. 10.
4. ,
. ,
5.
. .
6.
.

,
, ,
1628.
-

, .
-
.
.
.

. ,
. . . 16-1 (1) -
, , -
, (), (2)
. ,
- ,
, 1.
,
. .
-
. . ()
, ;
CO2 . .

421
II 422




.
,


, -
(.


. 42 43). -


, ,
,
. -
120


, -
100 () ,

P. -
( . .)

80

() ,
.
60

.

40 -

. -
20

PR.
0
,
5
-

4 . , -
3
(/)

2 .
1
0
QRS . -
,
T2.
38

32

()

26
.
20 ; -
1 , ,
2 .
3

,
a
c v 75% 3.

.

R P .


P T P
, ()
,
Q R .
S

.

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 .
() -
. 16-1 - . -
. ,
, . ( Berne RM, Levy
, , -
MN: The cardiac pump. In Cardiovascular Physiology, 8th ed. St Louis, CV Mosby, 2001,
pp 55-82.) ,
.

.

-
. -
A -
- 423 16
. . -
, -
- . -
. -
/ , ,
.
- .

II
. - , -
- -
, - , ()
; -
, , .
, - .
.
, -
.
,
, ,

.

. ()
. -
(. 16-2). - ,
.
, I
- ,
. III , 5. -
- ,
, - ;
. 6.

4.
,
, ,
. .
, ,
-
- . -
. , -
.
, - , -
. ,
.


-
, . -

, -
(. 16-3). -

, -

,
3.

.

,
. -

,
1. (
) ,
.
. 16-2 . ( Marieb EN: Human Anatomy &
Phisiology, 5th ed. San Francisco, Pearson Benjamin Cummings, 2001, p.684.)
, , - A
II 424

200



()


. 16-3 .


100 ,
. -
-
; , ,

0
0 150 300
() ()

.
, , ,
. .


.
, , -
. ,
-
- (. . 16-3). 1985 .
. , , - ,
, -

. 8. .. , -
- , 1914 .
, , ,
.
, ,
, .
-
,

-
. ,
() (P)
(R), (h)3:

= P R 2h
-
,
-
. R
R

-

.

. ,

.

=
2 ( )
,
.
. 16-4

(). -
( ). .
, , = / (2
, - ). , -
, ,
A (. 16-4)7.
. (Opie LH: Ventricular function. In the Heart. Physiology
from Cell to Circulation, 4th ed. Philadelphia, LippincottRaven, 2004, pp 355-401.)
- 425 16
, pH, ,

, , . -
-

.

Vmax

II
. Vmax


-

. -
, Vmax
-
. -

. -
- -
-
( ) -, ,
. 16-5 . , - (. 16-6)7. -
, ,
, . () (). -
(Opie LH: Ventricular function. In the Heart. Physiology from Cell to Circulation, -
4th ed. Philadelphia, LippincottRaven, 2004, pp 355-401.)

, -
9. ,
.
, -
- = ( )/ ,
. ,
-
. .
,
(2,0-2,2 )
, .
, - .
. ,
,
.
. , - -
,
.
, -

, 80% -

10%8. -
,

, -
. -
-
-
c

( ) (). , b

10. ,
-
a
-
d
, . e



,
. 16-6 -. -
,
. b,
. , - ( b-c).
, d, .
(. 16-5)7. a, b, c d, e, d c.
, , - , , -
, -
c. (Opie LH: Ventricular function. In the Heart. Physiology from
Cell to Circulation, 4th ed. Philadelphia, LippincottRaven, 2004, pp 355-401.)
A
II 426

.
11.
, , -
() (P),
:

= P = ( ) P

,
. -

-
(). ,
-
,
. O2
250
. O2 /
-
12:
q1 q2 q3
= /-
. [O2 ] pa [O2 ] pv
0,15 O2 / 0,20 O2 /

q1+q2=q3

. 16-7
( .
, (2), -
(2) ,
- . ( Berne RM, Levy MN: The cardiac pump. In Cardiovascular Physiology,
- 8th ed. St Louis, CV Mosby, 2001, pp 55-82.)
).
- -
, - . ,
,
11. . -
.
5% -
- , -
15% .
.
.
-12,13. -
150 180 , -
. , -
- (-dP/dt)
, ().
. ,
, - ,
.
-

- .
-. -
-,
12. 12,14.

: , -
, , -
4 : (1) ; ,
(2) (.. , -
); (3) , . -
; (4) - -
. - ,
.
A (2 4 ) - .
- 427 16

15.
Q

A B
.

q
.

II



,
,
. ,
-
. ,
-

. 0

t1 t2

. 16-8
, . -
(Q). - . (q)
Q (/). -
4 :

, .
, , .
, - , ,
. . (Berne RM, Levy MN: The
cardiac pump. In Cardiovascular Physiology, 8th ed. St Louis, CV Mosby, 2001, pp
- 55-82.)
,
. - . .
, Q ( O2) + q2= Q (C O2)
. - . .
- q 2 = Q(C O2) Q(CO2)
.
. q 2 = Q(C O2 C O2)
, .
, 12,13. Q = q 2 (C O2 C O2 )
, , -
- (CO2),
. - (CO2) (q2),
, .
. 16-71.
;
. , ,

Вам также может понравиться