Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Решение:
Постоянная палата международного правосудия решила, что Турция не нарушила международное
право, потому как действия, начавшиеся на борту "Лотоса", привели к последствиям на турецком судне.
Таким образом, суд установил, что в данном случае применим реальный принцип (согласно этому принципу
действие уголовно-правовых норм данного государства распространяется на деяния, совершенные за границей и
направленные против интересов данного государства, независимо от гражданства преступника).
The Lotus Case was also significant in that the PCIJ said that a State would have territorial
jurisdiction, even if the crime was committed outside its territory, so long as a constitutive element of the
crime was committed in that State. Today, we call this subjective territorial jurisdiction. In order for
subjective territorial jurisdiction to be established, one must prove that the element of the crime and the actual
crime are entirely inseparable; i.e., if the constituent element was absent – the crime would not have happened.
“The offence for which Lieutenant Demons appears to have been prosecuted was an act – of negligence
or imprudence – having its origin on board the Lotus, whilst its effects made themselves felt on board the Boz-
Kourt. These two elements are, legally, entirely inseparable, so much so that their separation renders the
offence non-existent… It is only natural that each should be able to exercise jurisdiction and to do so in respect
of the incident as a whole. It is therefore a case of concurrent jurisdiction.”